Calculation using contracted Binachi identity

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Let $(M,g)$ be an $n$-dimensional complete Riemannian manifold. Consider the following equation
$$tag1 s=nc+Delta f,$$
where $s$ is the scalar curvature, $c$ is any real number and $fin C^2(M)$. It is given that by using contracted Binachi identity, the above equation implies that
$$tag2 |nabla f|^2+s+2cf=A_0,$$
for some constant $A_0$. I can not get the intermediate steps. Please help me to under stand this proof.



The above is found in p.376 of this paper.







share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    Let $(M,g)$ be an $n$-dimensional complete Riemannian manifold. Consider the following equation
    $$tag1 s=nc+Delta f,$$
    where $s$ is the scalar curvature, $c$ is any real number and $fin C^2(M)$. It is given that by using contracted Binachi identity, the above equation implies that
    $$tag2 |nabla f|^2+s+2cf=A_0,$$
    for some constant $A_0$. I can not get the intermediate steps. Please help me to under stand this proof.



    The above is found in p.376 of this paper.







    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      Let $(M,g)$ be an $n$-dimensional complete Riemannian manifold. Consider the following equation
      $$tag1 s=nc+Delta f,$$
      where $s$ is the scalar curvature, $c$ is any real number and $fin C^2(M)$. It is given that by using contracted Binachi identity, the above equation implies that
      $$tag2 |nabla f|^2+s+2cf=A_0,$$
      for some constant $A_0$. I can not get the intermediate steps. Please help me to under stand this proof.



      The above is found in p.376 of this paper.







      share|cite|improve this question














      Let $(M,g)$ be an $n$-dimensional complete Riemannian manifold. Consider the following equation
      $$tag1 s=nc+Delta f,$$
      where $s$ is the scalar curvature, $c$ is any real number and $fin C^2(M)$. It is given that by using contracted Binachi identity, the above equation implies that
      $$tag2 |nabla f|^2+s+2cf=A_0,$$
      for some constant $A_0$. I can not get the intermediate steps. Please help me to under stand this proof.



      The above is found in p.376 of this paper.









      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Aug 21 at 20:58









      John Ma

      37.7k93669




      37.7k93669










      asked Aug 21 at 12:24









      chandan mondal

      1487




      1487




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          This is in the context of Ricci soliton and (2) is a well-known formula proved by Hamilton which follows from the Ricci soliton equation instead of (1). The proof can be found in Lemma 1.1 in this survey. For completeness I'll record the proof here:



          The Ricci soliton equation is
          $$tag3 operatornameRc = c g + D^2 f,$$
          or $R_jk = cg_jk + f_jk$. Taking covariant derivative to (3) and commuting the derivatives,
          beginalignnabla _i R_jk &= nabla _i f_jk \
          &= nabla_j f_ik + R_ijk^l nabla_l f \
          &= nabla_j R_ik+R_ijk^l nabla_l f.
          endalign
          Taking the trace on $j$ and $k$, and using the contracted second Bianchi identity,
          $$nabla_i s = nabla^j R_ij - R^l_i nabla_l f = frac 12 nabla_i s - R^l_i nabla_l f.$$
          Thus $nabla _i s = -2 R_i^l nabla_l f$. So
          beginalign
          nabla_i(|nabla f|^2+s+2cf) &= 2f_ji nabla_j f + nabla_i s + 2cnabla_ i f \
          &= 2(R_ij -c g_ij) nabla_j f - 2R_ij nabla _j f + 2c nabla_i f = 0.
          endalign



          Thus $|nabla f|^2+s+2cf$ is constant.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );








             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2889802%2fcalculation-using-contracted-binachi-identity%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            1
            down vote



            accepted










            This is in the context of Ricci soliton and (2) is a well-known formula proved by Hamilton which follows from the Ricci soliton equation instead of (1). The proof can be found in Lemma 1.1 in this survey. For completeness I'll record the proof here:



            The Ricci soliton equation is
            $$tag3 operatornameRc = c g + D^2 f,$$
            or $R_jk = cg_jk + f_jk$. Taking covariant derivative to (3) and commuting the derivatives,
            beginalignnabla _i R_jk &= nabla _i f_jk \
            &= nabla_j f_ik + R_ijk^l nabla_l f \
            &= nabla_j R_ik+R_ijk^l nabla_l f.
            endalign
            Taking the trace on $j$ and $k$, and using the contracted second Bianchi identity,
            $$nabla_i s = nabla^j R_ij - R^l_i nabla_l f = frac 12 nabla_i s - R^l_i nabla_l f.$$
            Thus $nabla _i s = -2 R_i^l nabla_l f$. So
            beginalign
            nabla_i(|nabla f|^2+s+2cf) &= 2f_ji nabla_j f + nabla_i s + 2cnabla_ i f \
            &= 2(R_ij -c g_ij) nabla_j f - 2R_ij nabla _j f + 2c nabla_i f = 0.
            endalign



            Thus $|nabla f|^2+s+2cf$ is constant.






            share|cite|improve this answer
























              up vote
              1
              down vote



              accepted










              This is in the context of Ricci soliton and (2) is a well-known formula proved by Hamilton which follows from the Ricci soliton equation instead of (1). The proof can be found in Lemma 1.1 in this survey. For completeness I'll record the proof here:



              The Ricci soliton equation is
              $$tag3 operatornameRc = c g + D^2 f,$$
              or $R_jk = cg_jk + f_jk$. Taking covariant derivative to (3) and commuting the derivatives,
              beginalignnabla _i R_jk &= nabla _i f_jk \
              &= nabla_j f_ik + R_ijk^l nabla_l f \
              &= nabla_j R_ik+R_ijk^l nabla_l f.
              endalign
              Taking the trace on $j$ and $k$, and using the contracted second Bianchi identity,
              $$nabla_i s = nabla^j R_ij - R^l_i nabla_l f = frac 12 nabla_i s - R^l_i nabla_l f.$$
              Thus $nabla _i s = -2 R_i^l nabla_l f$. So
              beginalign
              nabla_i(|nabla f|^2+s+2cf) &= 2f_ji nabla_j f + nabla_i s + 2cnabla_ i f \
              &= 2(R_ij -c g_ij) nabla_j f - 2R_ij nabla _j f + 2c nabla_i f = 0.
              endalign



              Thus $|nabla f|^2+s+2cf$ is constant.






              share|cite|improve this answer






















                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted






                This is in the context of Ricci soliton and (2) is a well-known formula proved by Hamilton which follows from the Ricci soliton equation instead of (1). The proof can be found in Lemma 1.1 in this survey. For completeness I'll record the proof here:



                The Ricci soliton equation is
                $$tag3 operatornameRc = c g + D^2 f,$$
                or $R_jk = cg_jk + f_jk$. Taking covariant derivative to (3) and commuting the derivatives,
                beginalignnabla _i R_jk &= nabla _i f_jk \
                &= nabla_j f_ik + R_ijk^l nabla_l f \
                &= nabla_j R_ik+R_ijk^l nabla_l f.
                endalign
                Taking the trace on $j$ and $k$, and using the contracted second Bianchi identity,
                $$nabla_i s = nabla^j R_ij - R^l_i nabla_l f = frac 12 nabla_i s - R^l_i nabla_l f.$$
                Thus $nabla _i s = -2 R_i^l nabla_l f$. So
                beginalign
                nabla_i(|nabla f|^2+s+2cf) &= 2f_ji nabla_j f + nabla_i s + 2cnabla_ i f \
                &= 2(R_ij -c g_ij) nabla_j f - 2R_ij nabla _j f + 2c nabla_i f = 0.
                endalign



                Thus $|nabla f|^2+s+2cf$ is constant.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                This is in the context of Ricci soliton and (2) is a well-known formula proved by Hamilton which follows from the Ricci soliton equation instead of (1). The proof can be found in Lemma 1.1 in this survey. For completeness I'll record the proof here:



                The Ricci soliton equation is
                $$tag3 operatornameRc = c g + D^2 f,$$
                or $R_jk = cg_jk + f_jk$. Taking covariant derivative to (3) and commuting the derivatives,
                beginalignnabla _i R_jk &= nabla _i f_jk \
                &= nabla_j f_ik + R_ijk^l nabla_l f \
                &= nabla_j R_ik+R_ijk^l nabla_l f.
                endalign
                Taking the trace on $j$ and $k$, and using the contracted second Bianchi identity,
                $$nabla_i s = nabla^j R_ij - R^l_i nabla_l f = frac 12 nabla_i s - R^l_i nabla_l f.$$
                Thus $nabla _i s = -2 R_i^l nabla_l f$. So
                beginalign
                nabla_i(|nabla f|^2+s+2cf) &= 2f_ji nabla_j f + nabla_i s + 2cnabla_ i f \
                &= 2(R_ij -c g_ij) nabla_j f - 2R_ij nabla _j f + 2c nabla_i f = 0.
                endalign



                Thus $|nabla f|^2+s+2cf$ is constant.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Aug 21 at 20:58









                John Ma

                37.7k93669




                37.7k93669






















                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded


























                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2889802%2fcalculation-using-contracted-binachi-identity%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    這個網誌中的熱門文章

                    How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

                    Mutual Information Always Non-negative

                    Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?