Sequence converging pointwise and mutually Singular measures
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
This question is a slight variation of Rudin's Real and Complex Analysis (Third Edition 1987) Chapter 6 Q9. It has been asked here Mutually Singular measures.
I was wondering if instead of restricting the function f to just C$[0,1]$, we allow $f$ to be in $L^infty $ i.e the dual space of $L^1$. Precisely:
Suppose that $g_n$ is a sequence of positive continuous functions on I=$[0,1]$, $mu$ is a positive Borel measure on I, $m$ is the standard Lebesgue measure, and that
(i) $lim_nâÂÂinftyg_n(x)=0$ a.e. $[m]$
(ii) $int _I g_ndm=1$ for all n,
(iii) $lim_nâÂÂinftyint _I fg_ndm=int _I f dmu$ for every $mathbffâÂÂL^infty(I)$.
Does it follow that the measures ü and m are mutually singular?
$textbfThoughts:$
I think it should be true.
Using Radom Nikodym Theorem we can write $dmu=hdm+dkappa$, where $kappa$ is mutually singular to $m$
Now let $B$ be the set on which $m$ is supported thus $kappa(B)=0$ and $m(Ibackslash B)=0$.
On $B$, $g_n$ converges weakly to $h$ and since $g_n$ converges pointwise to $0$, using the answer here
Real Analysis Convergence question
We get that $h=0$ a.e $B$ and thus also a.e I. Hence $mu$ and m are mutually singular.
Am I correct in doing so? If so, it is expected but at the same time interesting.
Thanks in advance.
real-analysis functional-analysis measure-theory
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
This question is a slight variation of Rudin's Real and Complex Analysis (Third Edition 1987) Chapter 6 Q9. It has been asked here Mutually Singular measures.
I was wondering if instead of restricting the function f to just C$[0,1]$, we allow $f$ to be in $L^infty $ i.e the dual space of $L^1$. Precisely:
Suppose that $g_n$ is a sequence of positive continuous functions on I=$[0,1]$, $mu$ is a positive Borel measure on I, $m$ is the standard Lebesgue measure, and that
(i) $lim_nâÂÂinftyg_n(x)=0$ a.e. $[m]$
(ii) $int _I g_ndm=1$ for all n,
(iii) $lim_nâÂÂinftyint _I fg_ndm=int _I f dmu$ for every $mathbffâÂÂL^infty(I)$.
Does it follow that the measures ü and m are mutually singular?
$textbfThoughts:$
I think it should be true.
Using Radom Nikodym Theorem we can write $dmu=hdm+dkappa$, where $kappa$ is mutually singular to $m$
Now let $B$ be the set on which $m$ is supported thus $kappa(B)=0$ and $m(Ibackslash B)=0$.
On $B$, $g_n$ converges weakly to $h$ and since $g_n$ converges pointwise to $0$, using the answer here
Real Analysis Convergence question
We get that $h=0$ a.e $B$ and thus also a.e I. Hence $mu$ and m are mutually singular.
Am I correct in doing so? If so, it is expected but at the same time interesting.
Thanks in advance.
real-analysis functional-analysis measure-theory
I think your argument is valid. Nice observation!
â Kavi Rama Murthy
Aug 21 at 10:28
Thank you for confirming.
â Sanchit
Aug 21 at 10:30
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
This question is a slight variation of Rudin's Real and Complex Analysis (Third Edition 1987) Chapter 6 Q9. It has been asked here Mutually Singular measures.
I was wondering if instead of restricting the function f to just C$[0,1]$, we allow $f$ to be in $L^infty $ i.e the dual space of $L^1$. Precisely:
Suppose that $g_n$ is a sequence of positive continuous functions on I=$[0,1]$, $mu$ is a positive Borel measure on I, $m$ is the standard Lebesgue measure, and that
(i) $lim_nâÂÂinftyg_n(x)=0$ a.e. $[m]$
(ii) $int _I g_ndm=1$ for all n,
(iii) $lim_nâÂÂinftyint _I fg_ndm=int _I f dmu$ for every $mathbffâÂÂL^infty(I)$.
Does it follow that the measures ü and m are mutually singular?
$textbfThoughts:$
I think it should be true.
Using Radom Nikodym Theorem we can write $dmu=hdm+dkappa$, where $kappa$ is mutually singular to $m$
Now let $B$ be the set on which $m$ is supported thus $kappa(B)=0$ and $m(Ibackslash B)=0$.
On $B$, $g_n$ converges weakly to $h$ and since $g_n$ converges pointwise to $0$, using the answer here
Real Analysis Convergence question
We get that $h=0$ a.e $B$ and thus also a.e I. Hence $mu$ and m are mutually singular.
Am I correct in doing so? If so, it is expected but at the same time interesting.
Thanks in advance.
real-analysis functional-analysis measure-theory
This question is a slight variation of Rudin's Real and Complex Analysis (Third Edition 1987) Chapter 6 Q9. It has been asked here Mutually Singular measures.
I was wondering if instead of restricting the function f to just C$[0,1]$, we allow $f$ to be in $L^infty $ i.e the dual space of $L^1$. Precisely:
Suppose that $g_n$ is a sequence of positive continuous functions on I=$[0,1]$, $mu$ is a positive Borel measure on I, $m$ is the standard Lebesgue measure, and that
(i) $lim_nâÂÂinftyg_n(x)=0$ a.e. $[m]$
(ii) $int _I g_ndm=1$ for all n,
(iii) $lim_nâÂÂinftyint _I fg_ndm=int _I f dmu$ for every $mathbffâÂÂL^infty(I)$.
Does it follow that the measures ü and m are mutually singular?
$textbfThoughts:$
I think it should be true.
Using Radom Nikodym Theorem we can write $dmu=hdm+dkappa$, where $kappa$ is mutually singular to $m$
Now let $B$ be the set on which $m$ is supported thus $kappa(B)=0$ and $m(Ibackslash B)=0$.
On $B$, $g_n$ converges weakly to $h$ and since $g_n$ converges pointwise to $0$, using the answer here
Real Analysis Convergence question
We get that $h=0$ a.e $B$ and thus also a.e I. Hence $mu$ and m are mutually singular.
Am I correct in doing so? If so, it is expected but at the same time interesting.
Thanks in advance.
real-analysis functional-analysis measure-theory
asked Aug 21 at 10:20
Sanchit
587
587
I think your argument is valid. Nice observation!
â Kavi Rama Murthy
Aug 21 at 10:28
Thank you for confirming.
â Sanchit
Aug 21 at 10:30
add a comment |Â
I think your argument is valid. Nice observation!
â Kavi Rama Murthy
Aug 21 at 10:28
Thank you for confirming.
â Sanchit
Aug 21 at 10:30
I think your argument is valid. Nice observation!
â Kavi Rama Murthy
Aug 21 at 10:28
I think your argument is valid. Nice observation!
â Kavi Rama Murthy
Aug 21 at 10:28
Thank you for confirming.
â Sanchit
Aug 21 at 10:30
Thank you for confirming.
â Sanchit
Aug 21 at 10:30
add a comment |Â
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2889709%2fsequence-converging-pointwise-and-mutually-singular-measures%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
I think your argument is valid. Nice observation!
â Kavi Rama Murthy
Aug 21 at 10:28
Thank you for confirming.
â Sanchit
Aug 21 at 10:30