Sequence converging pointwise and mutually Singular measures

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












This question is a slight variation of Rudin's Real and Complex Analysis (Third Edition 1987) Chapter 6 Q9. It has been asked here Mutually Singular measures.



I was wondering if instead of restricting the function f to just C$[0,1]$, we allow $f$ to be in $L^infty $ i.e the dual space of $L^1$. Precisely:



Suppose that $g_n$ is a sequence of positive continuous functions on I=$[0,1]$, $mu$ is a positive Borel measure on I, $m$ is the standard Lebesgue measure, and that



(i) $lim_n→inftyg_n(x)=0$ a.e. $[m]$



(ii) $int _I g_ndm=1$ for all n,



(iii) $lim_n→inftyint _I fg_ndm=int _I f dmu$ for every $mathbff∈L^infty(I)$.



Does it follow that the measures μ and m are mutually singular?



$textbfThoughts:$



I think it should be true.



Using Radom Nikodym Theorem we can write $dmu=hdm+dkappa$, where $kappa$ is mutually singular to $m$



Now let $B$ be the set on which $m$ is supported thus $kappa(B)=0$ and $m(Ibackslash B)=0$.



On $B$, $g_n$ converges weakly to $h$ and since $g_n$ converges pointwise to $0$, using the answer here



Real Analysis Convergence question



We get that $h=0$ a.e $B$ and thus also a.e I. Hence $mu$ and m are mutually singular.



Am I correct in doing so? If so, it is expected but at the same time interesting.



Thanks in advance.







share|cite|improve this question




















  • I think your argument is valid. Nice observation!
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Aug 21 at 10:28










  • Thank you for confirming.
    – Sanchit
    Aug 21 at 10:30














up vote
0
down vote

favorite












This question is a slight variation of Rudin's Real and Complex Analysis (Third Edition 1987) Chapter 6 Q9. It has been asked here Mutually Singular measures.



I was wondering if instead of restricting the function f to just C$[0,1]$, we allow $f$ to be in $L^infty $ i.e the dual space of $L^1$. Precisely:



Suppose that $g_n$ is a sequence of positive continuous functions on I=$[0,1]$, $mu$ is a positive Borel measure on I, $m$ is the standard Lebesgue measure, and that



(i) $lim_n→inftyg_n(x)=0$ a.e. $[m]$



(ii) $int _I g_ndm=1$ for all n,



(iii) $lim_n→inftyint _I fg_ndm=int _I f dmu$ for every $mathbff∈L^infty(I)$.



Does it follow that the measures μ and m are mutually singular?



$textbfThoughts:$



I think it should be true.



Using Radom Nikodym Theorem we can write $dmu=hdm+dkappa$, where $kappa$ is mutually singular to $m$



Now let $B$ be the set on which $m$ is supported thus $kappa(B)=0$ and $m(Ibackslash B)=0$.



On $B$, $g_n$ converges weakly to $h$ and since $g_n$ converges pointwise to $0$, using the answer here



Real Analysis Convergence question



We get that $h=0$ a.e $B$ and thus also a.e I. Hence $mu$ and m are mutually singular.



Am I correct in doing so? If so, it is expected but at the same time interesting.



Thanks in advance.







share|cite|improve this question




















  • I think your argument is valid. Nice observation!
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Aug 21 at 10:28










  • Thank you for confirming.
    – Sanchit
    Aug 21 at 10:30












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











This question is a slight variation of Rudin's Real and Complex Analysis (Third Edition 1987) Chapter 6 Q9. It has been asked here Mutually Singular measures.



I was wondering if instead of restricting the function f to just C$[0,1]$, we allow $f$ to be in $L^infty $ i.e the dual space of $L^1$. Precisely:



Suppose that $g_n$ is a sequence of positive continuous functions on I=$[0,1]$, $mu$ is a positive Borel measure on I, $m$ is the standard Lebesgue measure, and that



(i) $lim_n→inftyg_n(x)=0$ a.e. $[m]$



(ii) $int _I g_ndm=1$ for all n,



(iii) $lim_n→inftyint _I fg_ndm=int _I f dmu$ for every $mathbff∈L^infty(I)$.



Does it follow that the measures μ and m are mutually singular?



$textbfThoughts:$



I think it should be true.



Using Radom Nikodym Theorem we can write $dmu=hdm+dkappa$, where $kappa$ is mutually singular to $m$



Now let $B$ be the set on which $m$ is supported thus $kappa(B)=0$ and $m(Ibackslash B)=0$.



On $B$, $g_n$ converges weakly to $h$ and since $g_n$ converges pointwise to $0$, using the answer here



Real Analysis Convergence question



We get that $h=0$ a.e $B$ and thus also a.e I. Hence $mu$ and m are mutually singular.



Am I correct in doing so? If so, it is expected but at the same time interesting.



Thanks in advance.







share|cite|improve this question












This question is a slight variation of Rudin's Real and Complex Analysis (Third Edition 1987) Chapter 6 Q9. It has been asked here Mutually Singular measures.



I was wondering if instead of restricting the function f to just C$[0,1]$, we allow $f$ to be in $L^infty $ i.e the dual space of $L^1$. Precisely:



Suppose that $g_n$ is a sequence of positive continuous functions on I=$[0,1]$, $mu$ is a positive Borel measure on I, $m$ is the standard Lebesgue measure, and that



(i) $lim_n→inftyg_n(x)=0$ a.e. $[m]$



(ii) $int _I g_ndm=1$ for all n,



(iii) $lim_n→inftyint _I fg_ndm=int _I f dmu$ for every $mathbff∈L^infty(I)$.



Does it follow that the measures μ and m are mutually singular?



$textbfThoughts:$



I think it should be true.



Using Radom Nikodym Theorem we can write $dmu=hdm+dkappa$, where $kappa$ is mutually singular to $m$



Now let $B$ be the set on which $m$ is supported thus $kappa(B)=0$ and $m(Ibackslash B)=0$.



On $B$, $g_n$ converges weakly to $h$ and since $g_n$ converges pointwise to $0$, using the answer here



Real Analysis Convergence question



We get that $h=0$ a.e $B$ and thus also a.e I. Hence $mu$ and m are mutually singular.



Am I correct in doing so? If so, it is expected but at the same time interesting.



Thanks in advance.









share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Aug 21 at 10:20









Sanchit

587




587











  • I think your argument is valid. Nice observation!
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Aug 21 at 10:28










  • Thank you for confirming.
    – Sanchit
    Aug 21 at 10:30
















  • I think your argument is valid. Nice observation!
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Aug 21 at 10:28










  • Thank you for confirming.
    – Sanchit
    Aug 21 at 10:30















I think your argument is valid. Nice observation!
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Aug 21 at 10:28




I think your argument is valid. Nice observation!
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Aug 21 at 10:28












Thank you for confirming.
– Sanchit
Aug 21 at 10:30




Thank you for confirming.
– Sanchit
Aug 21 at 10:30















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2889709%2fsequence-converging-pointwise-and-mutually-singular-measures%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest



































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes










 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2889709%2fsequence-converging-pointwise-and-mutually-singular-measures%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

Mutual Information Always Non-negative

Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?