Calculate, $fbigg(frac11997bigg)+fbigg(frac21997bigg)+fbigg(frac31997bigg)ldots fbigg(frac19961997bigg)$ [duplicate]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
8
down vote

favorite
1













This question already has an answer here:



  • find $f(frac12014)+f(frac22014)+…+f(frac20132014)$ of $f(x)=frac22+4^x$

    1 answer




If $$f(x)=frac4^x4^x+2$$



Calculate,



$$fbigg(frac11997bigg)+fbigg(frac21997bigg)+fbigg(frac31997bigg)ldots
fbigg(frac19961997bigg)$$




My Attempt:



I was not able to generalise the expression or get a solid pattern, so I started with smaller numbers and calculated,



$$fbigg(frac12bigg)=frac12$$



$$fbigg(frac13bigg)+fbigg(frac23bigg)=1$$



$$fbigg(frac14bigg)+fbigg(frac24bigg)+fbigg(frac34bigg)=frac32$$



I could see that,



$$fbigg(frac1nbigg)+fbigg(frac2nbigg)+fbigg(frac3nbigg)ldots
fbigg(fracn-1nbigg)=fracn-12$$



So, $$fbigg(frac11997bigg)+fbigg(frac21997bigg)+fbigg(frac31997bigg)ldots
fbigg(frac19961997bigg)=998$$



which is indeed the right answer. But I am not satisfied with my method. How else can I solve it?







share|cite|improve this question












marked as duplicate by lab bhattacharjee calculus
Users with the  calculus badge can single-handedly close calculus questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

);
);
);
Aug 21 at 14:04


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.














  • I would write $$f(x)=frac2^2x2+2^2x$$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Aug 21 at 13:31










  • I tried simplifying as $$1-frac22^2x+2$$ but no help.
    – prog_SAHIL
    Aug 21 at 13:32











  • And this is $$1-frac12^2x-1+1$$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Aug 21 at 13:35














up vote
8
down vote

favorite
1













This question already has an answer here:



  • find $f(frac12014)+f(frac22014)+…+f(frac20132014)$ of $f(x)=frac22+4^x$

    1 answer




If $$f(x)=frac4^x4^x+2$$



Calculate,



$$fbigg(frac11997bigg)+fbigg(frac21997bigg)+fbigg(frac31997bigg)ldots
fbigg(frac19961997bigg)$$




My Attempt:



I was not able to generalise the expression or get a solid pattern, so I started with smaller numbers and calculated,



$$fbigg(frac12bigg)=frac12$$



$$fbigg(frac13bigg)+fbigg(frac23bigg)=1$$



$$fbigg(frac14bigg)+fbigg(frac24bigg)+fbigg(frac34bigg)=frac32$$



I could see that,



$$fbigg(frac1nbigg)+fbigg(frac2nbigg)+fbigg(frac3nbigg)ldots
fbigg(fracn-1nbigg)=fracn-12$$



So, $$fbigg(frac11997bigg)+fbigg(frac21997bigg)+fbigg(frac31997bigg)ldots
fbigg(frac19961997bigg)=998$$



which is indeed the right answer. But I am not satisfied with my method. How else can I solve it?







share|cite|improve this question












marked as duplicate by lab bhattacharjee calculus
Users with the  calculus badge can single-handedly close calculus questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

);
);
);
Aug 21 at 14:04


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.














  • I would write $$f(x)=frac2^2x2+2^2x$$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Aug 21 at 13:31










  • I tried simplifying as $$1-frac22^2x+2$$ but no help.
    – prog_SAHIL
    Aug 21 at 13:32











  • And this is $$1-frac12^2x-1+1$$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Aug 21 at 13:35












up vote
8
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
8
down vote

favorite
1






1






This question already has an answer here:



  • find $f(frac12014)+f(frac22014)+…+f(frac20132014)$ of $f(x)=frac22+4^x$

    1 answer




If $$f(x)=frac4^x4^x+2$$



Calculate,



$$fbigg(frac11997bigg)+fbigg(frac21997bigg)+fbigg(frac31997bigg)ldots
fbigg(frac19961997bigg)$$




My Attempt:



I was not able to generalise the expression or get a solid pattern, so I started with smaller numbers and calculated,



$$fbigg(frac12bigg)=frac12$$



$$fbigg(frac13bigg)+fbigg(frac23bigg)=1$$



$$fbigg(frac14bigg)+fbigg(frac24bigg)+fbigg(frac34bigg)=frac32$$



I could see that,



$$fbigg(frac1nbigg)+fbigg(frac2nbigg)+fbigg(frac3nbigg)ldots
fbigg(fracn-1nbigg)=fracn-12$$



So, $$fbigg(frac11997bigg)+fbigg(frac21997bigg)+fbigg(frac31997bigg)ldots
fbigg(frac19961997bigg)=998$$



which is indeed the right answer. But I am not satisfied with my method. How else can I solve it?







share|cite|improve this question













This question already has an answer here:



  • find $f(frac12014)+f(frac22014)+…+f(frac20132014)$ of $f(x)=frac22+4^x$

    1 answer




If $$f(x)=frac4^x4^x+2$$



Calculate,



$$fbigg(frac11997bigg)+fbigg(frac21997bigg)+fbigg(frac31997bigg)ldots
fbigg(frac19961997bigg)$$




My Attempt:



I was not able to generalise the expression or get a solid pattern, so I started with smaller numbers and calculated,



$$fbigg(frac12bigg)=frac12$$



$$fbigg(frac13bigg)+fbigg(frac23bigg)=1$$



$$fbigg(frac14bigg)+fbigg(frac24bigg)+fbigg(frac34bigg)=frac32$$



I could see that,



$$fbigg(frac1nbigg)+fbigg(frac2nbigg)+fbigg(frac3nbigg)ldots
fbigg(fracn-1nbigg)=fracn-12$$



So, $$fbigg(frac11997bigg)+fbigg(frac21997bigg)+fbigg(frac31997bigg)ldots
fbigg(frac19961997bigg)=998$$



which is indeed the right answer. But I am not satisfied with my method. How else can I solve it?





This question already has an answer here:



  • find $f(frac12014)+f(frac22014)+…+f(frac20132014)$ of $f(x)=frac22+4^x$

    1 answer









share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Aug 21 at 13:26









prog_SAHIL

1,197318




1,197318




marked as duplicate by lab bhattacharjee calculus
Users with the  calculus badge can single-handedly close calculus questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

);
);
);
Aug 21 at 14:04


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.






marked as duplicate by lab bhattacharjee calculus
Users with the  calculus badge can single-handedly close calculus questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

);
);
);
Aug 21 at 14:04


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.













  • I would write $$f(x)=frac2^2x2+2^2x$$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Aug 21 at 13:31










  • I tried simplifying as $$1-frac22^2x+2$$ but no help.
    – prog_SAHIL
    Aug 21 at 13:32











  • And this is $$1-frac12^2x-1+1$$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Aug 21 at 13:35
















  • I would write $$f(x)=frac2^2x2+2^2x$$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Aug 21 at 13:31










  • I tried simplifying as $$1-frac22^2x+2$$ but no help.
    – prog_SAHIL
    Aug 21 at 13:32











  • And this is $$1-frac12^2x-1+1$$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Aug 21 at 13:35















I would write $$f(x)=frac2^2x2+2^2x$$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
Aug 21 at 13:31




I would write $$f(x)=frac2^2x2+2^2x$$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
Aug 21 at 13:31












I tried simplifying as $$1-frac22^2x+2$$ but no help.
– prog_SAHIL
Aug 21 at 13:32





I tried simplifying as $$1-frac22^2x+2$$ but no help.
– prog_SAHIL
Aug 21 at 13:32













And this is $$1-frac12^2x-1+1$$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
Aug 21 at 13:35




And this is $$1-frac12^2x-1+1$$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
Aug 21 at 13:35










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
7
down vote



accepted










I would say your method is practically speaking what I would also do.
Maybe I would rephrase it as follows:



Claim: $f(a)+f(1-a)=1$.



Then write $S$ for the sum in question, and then $2S$ can be written as $f(1/1997+1996/1997) + cdots$ (the Gauss trick), which is $1996$ by the claim, so $S=998$.






share|cite|improve this answer
















  • 2




    literally 30 seconds before me sheesh
    – Rushabh Mehta
    Aug 21 at 13:33






  • 1




    Are you sure of it? I got a different result.
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Aug 21 at 13:34










  • @Dr.SonnhardGraubner I'm pretty sure this is correct...what result did you get
    – Rushabh Mehta
    Aug 21 at 13:36










  • Rushabh Mehta: sorry, bad luck. Dr. Sonnhard Graubner: I checked it twice, but if you want, I can provide the calculation.
    – A. Pongrácz
    Aug 21 at 13:36










  • Ok, i will also check my result, before posting.
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Aug 21 at 13:38

















up vote
4
down vote













Given $f(x)=dfrac4^x4^x+2$



From that we get $f(1-x)=dfrac24^x+2$



First let us take the last term $fleft(dfrac11997right)$



Notice that $fleft(dfrac11997right)=fleft(1-dfrac11997right)$ and same for the rest of the terms.



Now, $f(x)+f(1-x)=1$



$fleft(dfrac11997right)+fleft(dfrac21997right)+........+fleft(1-dfrac21997+fleft(1-dfrac11997right)right)$



all of them makes pairs.



So, the total pairs $=dfrac19962=998$



So, the sum $=1+1+1+......998$ times $=998$






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • The reason I suggested to write down $S$ twice instead of pairing, is because that way you do not have to discuss anything about the case of an odd number of terms. But in any case, this is practically the same answer I gave.
    – A. Pongrácz
    Aug 21 at 13:40

















2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
7
down vote



accepted










I would say your method is practically speaking what I would also do.
Maybe I would rephrase it as follows:



Claim: $f(a)+f(1-a)=1$.



Then write $S$ for the sum in question, and then $2S$ can be written as $f(1/1997+1996/1997) + cdots$ (the Gauss trick), which is $1996$ by the claim, so $S=998$.






share|cite|improve this answer
















  • 2




    literally 30 seconds before me sheesh
    – Rushabh Mehta
    Aug 21 at 13:33






  • 1




    Are you sure of it? I got a different result.
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Aug 21 at 13:34










  • @Dr.SonnhardGraubner I'm pretty sure this is correct...what result did you get
    – Rushabh Mehta
    Aug 21 at 13:36










  • Rushabh Mehta: sorry, bad luck. Dr. Sonnhard Graubner: I checked it twice, but if you want, I can provide the calculation.
    – A. Pongrácz
    Aug 21 at 13:36










  • Ok, i will also check my result, before posting.
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Aug 21 at 13:38














up vote
7
down vote



accepted










I would say your method is practically speaking what I would also do.
Maybe I would rephrase it as follows:



Claim: $f(a)+f(1-a)=1$.



Then write $S$ for the sum in question, and then $2S$ can be written as $f(1/1997+1996/1997) + cdots$ (the Gauss trick), which is $1996$ by the claim, so $S=998$.






share|cite|improve this answer
















  • 2




    literally 30 seconds before me sheesh
    – Rushabh Mehta
    Aug 21 at 13:33






  • 1




    Are you sure of it? I got a different result.
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Aug 21 at 13:34










  • @Dr.SonnhardGraubner I'm pretty sure this is correct...what result did you get
    – Rushabh Mehta
    Aug 21 at 13:36










  • Rushabh Mehta: sorry, bad luck. Dr. Sonnhard Graubner: I checked it twice, but if you want, I can provide the calculation.
    – A. Pongrácz
    Aug 21 at 13:36










  • Ok, i will also check my result, before posting.
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Aug 21 at 13:38












up vote
7
down vote



accepted







up vote
7
down vote



accepted






I would say your method is practically speaking what I would also do.
Maybe I would rephrase it as follows:



Claim: $f(a)+f(1-a)=1$.



Then write $S$ for the sum in question, and then $2S$ can be written as $f(1/1997+1996/1997) + cdots$ (the Gauss trick), which is $1996$ by the claim, so $S=998$.






share|cite|improve this answer












I would say your method is practically speaking what I would also do.
Maybe I would rephrase it as follows:



Claim: $f(a)+f(1-a)=1$.



Then write $S$ for the sum in question, and then $2S$ can be written as $f(1/1997+1996/1997) + cdots$ (the Gauss trick), which is $1996$ by the claim, so $S=998$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Aug 21 at 13:33









A. Pongrácz

4,112625




4,112625







  • 2




    literally 30 seconds before me sheesh
    – Rushabh Mehta
    Aug 21 at 13:33






  • 1




    Are you sure of it? I got a different result.
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Aug 21 at 13:34










  • @Dr.SonnhardGraubner I'm pretty sure this is correct...what result did you get
    – Rushabh Mehta
    Aug 21 at 13:36










  • Rushabh Mehta: sorry, bad luck. Dr. Sonnhard Graubner: I checked it twice, but if you want, I can provide the calculation.
    – A. Pongrácz
    Aug 21 at 13:36










  • Ok, i will also check my result, before posting.
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Aug 21 at 13:38












  • 2




    literally 30 seconds before me sheesh
    – Rushabh Mehta
    Aug 21 at 13:33






  • 1




    Are you sure of it? I got a different result.
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Aug 21 at 13:34










  • @Dr.SonnhardGraubner I'm pretty sure this is correct...what result did you get
    – Rushabh Mehta
    Aug 21 at 13:36










  • Rushabh Mehta: sorry, bad luck. Dr. Sonnhard Graubner: I checked it twice, but if you want, I can provide the calculation.
    – A. Pongrácz
    Aug 21 at 13:36










  • Ok, i will also check my result, before posting.
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Aug 21 at 13:38







2




2




literally 30 seconds before me sheesh
– Rushabh Mehta
Aug 21 at 13:33




literally 30 seconds before me sheesh
– Rushabh Mehta
Aug 21 at 13:33




1




1




Are you sure of it? I got a different result.
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
Aug 21 at 13:34




Are you sure of it? I got a different result.
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
Aug 21 at 13:34












@Dr.SonnhardGraubner I'm pretty sure this is correct...what result did you get
– Rushabh Mehta
Aug 21 at 13:36




@Dr.SonnhardGraubner I'm pretty sure this is correct...what result did you get
– Rushabh Mehta
Aug 21 at 13:36












Rushabh Mehta: sorry, bad luck. Dr. Sonnhard Graubner: I checked it twice, but if you want, I can provide the calculation.
– A. Pongrácz
Aug 21 at 13:36




Rushabh Mehta: sorry, bad luck. Dr. Sonnhard Graubner: I checked it twice, but if you want, I can provide the calculation.
– A. Pongrácz
Aug 21 at 13:36












Ok, i will also check my result, before posting.
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
Aug 21 at 13:38




Ok, i will also check my result, before posting.
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
Aug 21 at 13:38










up vote
4
down vote













Given $f(x)=dfrac4^x4^x+2$



From that we get $f(1-x)=dfrac24^x+2$



First let us take the last term $fleft(dfrac11997right)$



Notice that $fleft(dfrac11997right)=fleft(1-dfrac11997right)$ and same for the rest of the terms.



Now, $f(x)+f(1-x)=1$



$fleft(dfrac11997right)+fleft(dfrac21997right)+........+fleft(1-dfrac21997+fleft(1-dfrac11997right)right)$



all of them makes pairs.



So, the total pairs $=dfrac19962=998$



So, the sum $=1+1+1+......998$ times $=998$






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • The reason I suggested to write down $S$ twice instead of pairing, is because that way you do not have to discuss anything about the case of an odd number of terms. But in any case, this is practically the same answer I gave.
    – A. Pongrácz
    Aug 21 at 13:40














up vote
4
down vote













Given $f(x)=dfrac4^x4^x+2$



From that we get $f(1-x)=dfrac24^x+2$



First let us take the last term $fleft(dfrac11997right)$



Notice that $fleft(dfrac11997right)=fleft(1-dfrac11997right)$ and same for the rest of the terms.



Now, $f(x)+f(1-x)=1$



$fleft(dfrac11997right)+fleft(dfrac21997right)+........+fleft(1-dfrac21997+fleft(1-dfrac11997right)right)$



all of them makes pairs.



So, the total pairs $=dfrac19962=998$



So, the sum $=1+1+1+......998$ times $=998$






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • The reason I suggested to write down $S$ twice instead of pairing, is because that way you do not have to discuss anything about the case of an odd number of terms. But in any case, this is practically the same answer I gave.
    – A. Pongrácz
    Aug 21 at 13:40












up vote
4
down vote










up vote
4
down vote









Given $f(x)=dfrac4^x4^x+2$



From that we get $f(1-x)=dfrac24^x+2$



First let us take the last term $fleft(dfrac11997right)$



Notice that $fleft(dfrac11997right)=fleft(1-dfrac11997right)$ and same for the rest of the terms.



Now, $f(x)+f(1-x)=1$



$fleft(dfrac11997right)+fleft(dfrac21997right)+........+fleft(1-dfrac21997+fleft(1-dfrac11997right)right)$



all of them makes pairs.



So, the total pairs $=dfrac19962=998$



So, the sum $=1+1+1+......998$ times $=998$






share|cite|improve this answer












Given $f(x)=dfrac4^x4^x+2$



From that we get $f(1-x)=dfrac24^x+2$



First let us take the last term $fleft(dfrac11997right)$



Notice that $fleft(dfrac11997right)=fleft(1-dfrac11997right)$ and same for the rest of the terms.



Now, $f(x)+f(1-x)=1$



$fleft(dfrac11997right)+fleft(dfrac21997right)+........+fleft(1-dfrac21997+fleft(1-dfrac11997right)right)$



all of them makes pairs.



So, the total pairs $=dfrac19962=998$



So, the sum $=1+1+1+......998$ times $=998$







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Aug 21 at 13:37









Key Flex

1




1











  • The reason I suggested to write down $S$ twice instead of pairing, is because that way you do not have to discuss anything about the case of an odd number of terms. But in any case, this is practically the same answer I gave.
    – A. Pongrácz
    Aug 21 at 13:40
















  • The reason I suggested to write down $S$ twice instead of pairing, is because that way you do not have to discuss anything about the case of an odd number of terms. But in any case, this is practically the same answer I gave.
    – A. Pongrácz
    Aug 21 at 13:40















The reason I suggested to write down $S$ twice instead of pairing, is because that way you do not have to discuss anything about the case of an odd number of terms. But in any case, this is practically the same answer I gave.
– A. Pongrácz
Aug 21 at 13:40




The reason I suggested to write down $S$ twice instead of pairing, is because that way you do not have to discuss anything about the case of an odd number of terms. But in any case, this is practically the same answer I gave.
– A. Pongrácz
Aug 21 at 13:40


這個網誌中的熱門文章

How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

Mutual Information Always Non-negative

Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?