A question concerning $R(n) :equiv (exists x,y,z) x^2 + y^2 = z^2 wedge x + y + z =n$

Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
A square number is a number $n$ with the property $S(n) :equiv (exists x) x^2 = n$.
A number $n neq 0$ is a square number iff it has an odd number of divisors.
A hypotenuse number is a number $n$ with the property $H(n) :equiv (exists x, y) x^2 + y^2 = n^2$.
A number is a hypotenuse number iff it has a prime factor of the form $4k+1$.
A Pythagorean triple is a triple $(a,b,c)$ of numbers with the property $P(a,b,c) :equiv a^2 + b^2 = c^2$.
A triple $(a,b,c)$ is Pythagorean iff
$$(*) (exists x,y,z) phi(x,y,z) wedge a = x(y^2 - z^2) wedge b = x(2yz) wedge c = x(y^2 + z^2)$$
with $phi(x,y,z) :equiv x,y,zgeq 0, y > z, y, z$ co-prime and not both odd.
I wonder if the following property $R(n)$ has been defined before in its own right and what its official name is.
$$R(n) :equiv (exists x,y,z) P(x,y,z) wedge x + y + z =n$$
A number $n$ is $R$ iff a regular $n$-gon with rigid sides can be transformed into a right triangle, possibly in different ways, thus being the perimeter of a right-angled triangle (thanks to Ronald Blaak for this formulation). ($R$ stands for "right-triangulizable".)
From $(*)$ it's obvious that $R(n)$ iff $(exists x,y,z) phi(x,y,z) wedge 2xy(y + z) = n$.
Is there another characterization of $R$ involving prime factors (instead of arbitrary divisors of which two have to be co-prime)?
geometry arithmetic euclidean-geometry diophantine-equations
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
A square number is a number $n$ with the property $S(n) :equiv (exists x) x^2 = n$.
A number $n neq 0$ is a square number iff it has an odd number of divisors.
A hypotenuse number is a number $n$ with the property $H(n) :equiv (exists x, y) x^2 + y^2 = n^2$.
A number is a hypotenuse number iff it has a prime factor of the form $4k+1$.
A Pythagorean triple is a triple $(a,b,c)$ of numbers with the property $P(a,b,c) :equiv a^2 + b^2 = c^2$.
A triple $(a,b,c)$ is Pythagorean iff
$$(*) (exists x,y,z) phi(x,y,z) wedge a = x(y^2 - z^2) wedge b = x(2yz) wedge c = x(y^2 + z^2)$$
with $phi(x,y,z) :equiv x,y,zgeq 0, y > z, y, z$ co-prime and not both odd.
I wonder if the following property $R(n)$ has been defined before in its own right and what its official name is.
$$R(n) :equiv (exists x,y,z) P(x,y,z) wedge x + y + z =n$$
A number $n$ is $R$ iff a regular $n$-gon with rigid sides can be transformed into a right triangle, possibly in different ways, thus being the perimeter of a right-angled triangle (thanks to Ronald Blaak for this formulation). ($R$ stands for "right-triangulizable".)
From $(*)$ it's obvious that $R(n)$ iff $(exists x,y,z) phi(x,y,z) wedge 2xy(y + z) = n$.
Is there another characterization of $R$ involving prime factors (instead of arbitrary divisors of which two have to be co-prime)?
geometry arithmetic euclidean-geometry diophantine-equations
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
A square number is a number $n$ with the property $S(n) :equiv (exists x) x^2 = n$.
A number $n neq 0$ is a square number iff it has an odd number of divisors.
A hypotenuse number is a number $n$ with the property $H(n) :equiv (exists x, y) x^2 + y^2 = n^2$.
A number is a hypotenuse number iff it has a prime factor of the form $4k+1$.
A Pythagorean triple is a triple $(a,b,c)$ of numbers with the property $P(a,b,c) :equiv a^2 + b^2 = c^2$.
A triple $(a,b,c)$ is Pythagorean iff
$$(*) (exists x,y,z) phi(x,y,z) wedge a = x(y^2 - z^2) wedge b = x(2yz) wedge c = x(y^2 + z^2)$$
with $phi(x,y,z) :equiv x,y,zgeq 0, y > z, y, z$ co-prime and not both odd.
I wonder if the following property $R(n)$ has been defined before in its own right and what its official name is.
$$R(n) :equiv (exists x,y,z) P(x,y,z) wedge x + y + z =n$$
A number $n$ is $R$ iff a regular $n$-gon with rigid sides can be transformed into a right triangle, possibly in different ways, thus being the perimeter of a right-angled triangle (thanks to Ronald Blaak for this formulation). ($R$ stands for "right-triangulizable".)
From $(*)$ it's obvious that $R(n)$ iff $(exists x,y,z) phi(x,y,z) wedge 2xy(y + z) = n$.
Is there another characterization of $R$ involving prime factors (instead of arbitrary divisors of which two have to be co-prime)?
geometry arithmetic euclidean-geometry diophantine-equations
A square number is a number $n$ with the property $S(n) :equiv (exists x) x^2 = n$.
A number $n neq 0$ is a square number iff it has an odd number of divisors.
A hypotenuse number is a number $n$ with the property $H(n) :equiv (exists x, y) x^2 + y^2 = n^2$.
A number is a hypotenuse number iff it has a prime factor of the form $4k+1$.
A Pythagorean triple is a triple $(a,b,c)$ of numbers with the property $P(a,b,c) :equiv a^2 + b^2 = c^2$.
A triple $(a,b,c)$ is Pythagorean iff
$$(*) (exists x,y,z) phi(x,y,z) wedge a = x(y^2 - z^2) wedge b = x(2yz) wedge c = x(y^2 + z^2)$$
with $phi(x,y,z) :equiv x,y,zgeq 0, y > z, y, z$ co-prime and not both odd.
I wonder if the following property $R(n)$ has been defined before in its own right and what its official name is.
$$R(n) :equiv (exists x,y,z) P(x,y,z) wedge x + y + z =n$$
A number $n$ is $R$ iff a regular $n$-gon with rigid sides can be transformed into a right triangle, possibly in different ways, thus being the perimeter of a right-angled triangle (thanks to Ronald Blaak for this formulation). ($R$ stands for "right-triangulizable".)
From $(*)$ it's obvious that $R(n)$ iff $(exists x,y,z) phi(x,y,z) wedge 2xy(y + z) = n$.
Is there another characterization of $R$ involving prime factors (instead of arbitrary divisors of which two have to be co-prime)?
geometry arithmetic euclidean-geometry diophantine-equations
edited Aug 21 at 15:33
asked Aug 21 at 9:10
Hans Stricker
4,34513574
4,34513574
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
The final characterisation of $R(n)$ :
$R(n)$ iff $(exists x,y,z) phi(x,y,z) land 2 x y (y+z)=n $
is correct but can be simplified. Using that $x,y,z > 0$ (excluding zero-length sides), the resulting values of $a,b,c$ should be positive in order result in a proper length and perimeter. This is only relevant for $a>0$ because it gives $y>z$.
Since the perimeter of these triangles is always even, we find
$fracn2=x y (y+z)$ has to be an integer, with $1 leq z < y < y+z$, and it follows that $2 leq y < y+z < 2 y$. In other words, the half-perimeter needs to have to at least two different factors $p,q$ such that $p < q < 2 p$.
This is also sufficient, since if $fracn2=p q r$ with $rgeq 1$, we can take $x=r$,$y=p$, and $z=q-p$ to find an example of a right-angled triangle with perimeter $n$.
This criterion is simpler(more efficient), in the sense that it does not assume any triplets $(x,y,z)$ in advance, but is acting directly on the perimeter $n$ and also constructs a valid $(a,b,c)$ triplet from the input $n$ and its factorisation when possible.
I am not aware of a special name for these numbers, but the sequence can be found in the encyclopaedia of integer sequences A010814.
I didn't cross-check, but $phi(x,y,z)$ requires that $y neq z$ and not both are odd. So $n=42$ is probably not a counter-example.
â Hans Stricker
Aug 21 at 15:30
Ah, my mistake, I thought you wanted to use the two co-prime divisors of $n$ as a minimal requirement for $n$ to be $R(n)$. I revised my answer as it gives a simpler characterisation of allowed values of $n$.
â Ronald Blaak
Aug 21 at 16:03
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
The final characterisation of $R(n)$ :
$R(n)$ iff $(exists x,y,z) phi(x,y,z) land 2 x y (y+z)=n $
is correct but can be simplified. Using that $x,y,z > 0$ (excluding zero-length sides), the resulting values of $a,b,c$ should be positive in order result in a proper length and perimeter. This is only relevant for $a>0$ because it gives $y>z$.
Since the perimeter of these triangles is always even, we find
$fracn2=x y (y+z)$ has to be an integer, with $1 leq z < y < y+z$, and it follows that $2 leq y < y+z < 2 y$. In other words, the half-perimeter needs to have to at least two different factors $p,q$ such that $p < q < 2 p$.
This is also sufficient, since if $fracn2=p q r$ with $rgeq 1$, we can take $x=r$,$y=p$, and $z=q-p$ to find an example of a right-angled triangle with perimeter $n$.
This criterion is simpler(more efficient), in the sense that it does not assume any triplets $(x,y,z)$ in advance, but is acting directly on the perimeter $n$ and also constructs a valid $(a,b,c)$ triplet from the input $n$ and its factorisation when possible.
I am not aware of a special name for these numbers, but the sequence can be found in the encyclopaedia of integer sequences A010814.
I didn't cross-check, but $phi(x,y,z)$ requires that $y neq z$ and not both are odd. So $n=42$ is probably not a counter-example.
â Hans Stricker
Aug 21 at 15:30
Ah, my mistake, I thought you wanted to use the two co-prime divisors of $n$ as a minimal requirement for $n$ to be $R(n)$. I revised my answer as it gives a simpler characterisation of allowed values of $n$.
â Ronald Blaak
Aug 21 at 16:03
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
The final characterisation of $R(n)$ :
$R(n)$ iff $(exists x,y,z) phi(x,y,z) land 2 x y (y+z)=n $
is correct but can be simplified. Using that $x,y,z > 0$ (excluding zero-length sides), the resulting values of $a,b,c$ should be positive in order result in a proper length and perimeter. This is only relevant for $a>0$ because it gives $y>z$.
Since the perimeter of these triangles is always even, we find
$fracn2=x y (y+z)$ has to be an integer, with $1 leq z < y < y+z$, and it follows that $2 leq y < y+z < 2 y$. In other words, the half-perimeter needs to have to at least two different factors $p,q$ such that $p < q < 2 p$.
This is also sufficient, since if $fracn2=p q r$ with $rgeq 1$, we can take $x=r$,$y=p$, and $z=q-p$ to find an example of a right-angled triangle with perimeter $n$.
This criterion is simpler(more efficient), in the sense that it does not assume any triplets $(x,y,z)$ in advance, but is acting directly on the perimeter $n$ and also constructs a valid $(a,b,c)$ triplet from the input $n$ and its factorisation when possible.
I am not aware of a special name for these numbers, but the sequence can be found in the encyclopaedia of integer sequences A010814.
I didn't cross-check, but $phi(x,y,z)$ requires that $y neq z$ and not both are odd. So $n=42$ is probably not a counter-example.
â Hans Stricker
Aug 21 at 15:30
Ah, my mistake, I thought you wanted to use the two co-prime divisors of $n$ as a minimal requirement for $n$ to be $R(n)$. I revised my answer as it gives a simpler characterisation of allowed values of $n$.
â Ronald Blaak
Aug 21 at 16:03
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
The final characterisation of $R(n)$ :
$R(n)$ iff $(exists x,y,z) phi(x,y,z) land 2 x y (y+z)=n $
is correct but can be simplified. Using that $x,y,z > 0$ (excluding zero-length sides), the resulting values of $a,b,c$ should be positive in order result in a proper length and perimeter. This is only relevant for $a>0$ because it gives $y>z$.
Since the perimeter of these triangles is always even, we find
$fracn2=x y (y+z)$ has to be an integer, with $1 leq z < y < y+z$, and it follows that $2 leq y < y+z < 2 y$. In other words, the half-perimeter needs to have to at least two different factors $p,q$ such that $p < q < 2 p$.
This is also sufficient, since if $fracn2=p q r$ with $rgeq 1$, we can take $x=r$,$y=p$, and $z=q-p$ to find an example of a right-angled triangle with perimeter $n$.
This criterion is simpler(more efficient), in the sense that it does not assume any triplets $(x,y,z)$ in advance, but is acting directly on the perimeter $n$ and also constructs a valid $(a,b,c)$ triplet from the input $n$ and its factorisation when possible.
I am not aware of a special name for these numbers, but the sequence can be found in the encyclopaedia of integer sequences A010814.
The final characterisation of $R(n)$ :
$R(n)$ iff $(exists x,y,z) phi(x,y,z) land 2 x y (y+z)=n $
is correct but can be simplified. Using that $x,y,z > 0$ (excluding zero-length sides), the resulting values of $a,b,c$ should be positive in order result in a proper length and perimeter. This is only relevant for $a>0$ because it gives $y>z$.
Since the perimeter of these triangles is always even, we find
$fracn2=x y (y+z)$ has to be an integer, with $1 leq z < y < y+z$, and it follows that $2 leq y < y+z < 2 y$. In other words, the half-perimeter needs to have to at least two different factors $p,q$ such that $p < q < 2 p$.
This is also sufficient, since if $fracn2=p q r$ with $rgeq 1$, we can take $x=r$,$y=p$, and $z=q-p$ to find an example of a right-angled triangle with perimeter $n$.
This criterion is simpler(more efficient), in the sense that it does not assume any triplets $(x,y,z)$ in advance, but is acting directly on the perimeter $n$ and also constructs a valid $(a,b,c)$ triplet from the input $n$ and its factorisation when possible.
I am not aware of a special name for these numbers, but the sequence can be found in the encyclopaedia of integer sequences A010814.
edited Aug 21 at 16:16
answered Aug 21 at 14:03
Ronald Blaak
1,78438
1,78438
I didn't cross-check, but $phi(x,y,z)$ requires that $y neq z$ and not both are odd. So $n=42$ is probably not a counter-example.
â Hans Stricker
Aug 21 at 15:30
Ah, my mistake, I thought you wanted to use the two co-prime divisors of $n$ as a minimal requirement for $n$ to be $R(n)$. I revised my answer as it gives a simpler characterisation of allowed values of $n$.
â Ronald Blaak
Aug 21 at 16:03
add a comment |Â
I didn't cross-check, but $phi(x,y,z)$ requires that $y neq z$ and not both are odd. So $n=42$ is probably not a counter-example.
â Hans Stricker
Aug 21 at 15:30
Ah, my mistake, I thought you wanted to use the two co-prime divisors of $n$ as a minimal requirement for $n$ to be $R(n)$. I revised my answer as it gives a simpler characterisation of allowed values of $n$.
â Ronald Blaak
Aug 21 at 16:03
I didn't cross-check, but $phi(x,y,z)$ requires that $y neq z$ and not both are odd. So $n=42$ is probably not a counter-example.
â Hans Stricker
Aug 21 at 15:30
I didn't cross-check, but $phi(x,y,z)$ requires that $y neq z$ and not both are odd. So $n=42$ is probably not a counter-example.
â Hans Stricker
Aug 21 at 15:30
Ah, my mistake, I thought you wanted to use the two co-prime divisors of $n$ as a minimal requirement for $n$ to be $R(n)$. I revised my answer as it gives a simpler characterisation of allowed values of $n$.
â Ronald Blaak
Aug 21 at 16:03
Ah, my mistake, I thought you wanted to use the two co-prime divisors of $n$ as a minimal requirement for $n$ to be $R(n)$. I revised my answer as it gives a simpler characterisation of allowed values of $n$.
â Ronald Blaak
Aug 21 at 16:03
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2889648%2fa-question-concerning-rn-equiv-exists-x-y-z-x2-y2-z2-wedge-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password