Real valued continuous functions on [a,b] form a vector space with respect to usual addition and multiplication by scalars.

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite













Real valued continuous functions on $[a,b]$ form a vector space with respect to usual addition and multiplication by scalars.




Please help to show a proof. I think it would be a laborious one. Is it really?







share|cite|improve this question






















  • This is wrong there is for example not always a zero element
    – john
    Jul 25 '15 at 5:47










  • You shold just to check axioms of vector space. Why you stucked?
    – Michael Galuza
    Jul 25 '15 at 5:47










  • @john, $f(x)equiv 0$ is not a zero element?
    – Michael Galuza
    Jul 25 '15 at 5:47














up vote
0
down vote

favorite













Real valued continuous functions on $[a,b]$ form a vector space with respect to usual addition and multiplication by scalars.




Please help to show a proof. I think it would be a laborious one. Is it really?







share|cite|improve this question






















  • This is wrong there is for example not always a zero element
    – john
    Jul 25 '15 at 5:47










  • You shold just to check axioms of vector space. Why you stucked?
    – Michael Galuza
    Jul 25 '15 at 5:47










  • @john, $f(x)equiv 0$ is not a zero element?
    – Michael Galuza
    Jul 25 '15 at 5:47












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Real valued continuous functions on $[a,b]$ form a vector space with respect to usual addition and multiplication by scalars.




Please help to show a proof. I think it would be a laborious one. Is it really?







share|cite|improve this question















Real valued continuous functions on $[a,b]$ form a vector space with respect to usual addition and multiplication by scalars.




Please help to show a proof. I think it would be a laborious one. Is it really?









share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 25 '15 at 5:57









Rebecca J. Stones

20.7k22580




20.7k22580










asked Jul 25 '15 at 5:43







user251057


















  • This is wrong there is for example not always a zero element
    – john
    Jul 25 '15 at 5:47










  • You shold just to check axioms of vector space. Why you stucked?
    – Michael Galuza
    Jul 25 '15 at 5:47










  • @john, $f(x)equiv 0$ is not a zero element?
    – Michael Galuza
    Jul 25 '15 at 5:47
















  • This is wrong there is for example not always a zero element
    – john
    Jul 25 '15 at 5:47










  • You shold just to check axioms of vector space. Why you stucked?
    – Michael Galuza
    Jul 25 '15 at 5:47










  • @john, $f(x)equiv 0$ is not a zero element?
    – Michael Galuza
    Jul 25 '15 at 5:47















This is wrong there is for example not always a zero element
– john
Jul 25 '15 at 5:47




This is wrong there is for example not always a zero element
– john
Jul 25 '15 at 5:47












You shold just to check axioms of vector space. Why you stucked?
– Michael Galuza
Jul 25 '15 at 5:47




You shold just to check axioms of vector space. Why you stucked?
– Michael Galuza
Jul 25 '15 at 5:47












@john, $f(x)equiv 0$ is not a zero element?
– Michael Galuza
Jul 25 '15 at 5:47




@john, $f(x)equiv 0$ is not a zero element?
– Michael Galuza
Jul 25 '15 at 5:47










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote













It is quite laborious, but it's not too difficult. In my experiences, students tend to struggle with this kind of question particularly simply because it's so straightforward, they think they're not doing it properly, and it doesn't feel like they've actually proven anything.



Here, let me get you started. First, I'll address closure of the operations. Then I'll prove associativity of vector addition, then I'll establish the additive identity, and I'll leave you to do the rest.



Suppose $f, g in C[a, b]$ and $lambda in mathbbR$. The definitions of addition and scalar multiplication are respectively,
beginalign
(f + g)(x) &:= f(x) + g(x) &forall x in [a, b] \
(lambda f)(x) &:= lambda f(x) &forall x in [a, b]
endalign
By the algebra of continuous functions, $f + g$ and $lambda f$ are both continuous on $[a, b]$.



Suppose $f, g, h$ are continuous on $[a, b]$. We must establish that $(f + g) + h = f + (g + h)$. That is, we must establish, for all $x in [a, b]$,
$$((f + g) + h)(x) = (f + (g + h))(x).$$
Suppose $x in [a, b]$. Using the definition of vector addition, as well as the associativity of real numbers, we get
beginalign*
((f + g) + h)(x) &= (f + g)(x) + h(x) &ldots text definition \
&= (f(x) + g(x)) + h(x) &ldots text definition \
&= f(x) + (g(x) + h(x)) &ldots text associativity \
&= f(x) + (g + h)(x) &ldots text definition \
&= (f + (g + h))(x) &ldots text definition
endalign*
This holds for any $x in [a, b]$, so $(f + g) + h = f + (g + h)$.



Finally, to establish the identity $mathbf0$, we must specify what it is. We let $mathbf0$ be the function that maps any $x in [a, b]$ to $0$. This is a constant function, hence it is continuous. We now must prove it is an identity, that is, $mathbf0 + f = f$ for any $f$.



(In a wider sense, in order to establish $mathbf0$ is truly an identity, we would also need to prove $f + mathbf0 = f$, but you'll be proving commutativity later, which will make this redundant.)



Suppose $f$ is continuous on $[a, b]$ and $x in [a, b]$. Then,
$$(mathbf0 + f)(x) = mathbf0(x) + f(x) = 0 + f(x) = f(x).$$
Therefore $mathbf0 + f = mathbf0$.



Now you can establish the rest! You don't necessarily need as much detail as I'm using while writing it out, but you do need to cover all the axioms.






share|cite|improve this answer



























    up vote
    0
    down vote













    If you have to prove it without knowing anything about function spaces, @Theo Bendit has pointed out what you have to do. However, if you already know that $$mathcalV=f:mathbb Rrightarrowmathbb R$$ is a vector space, it is enough to show that $$mathcalW=f:mathbb Rrightarrowmathbb R~$$ is a subspace of of $mathcalV$.




    To prove that:



    • Show that the $fequiv 0inmathcalW$

    • Let $f,ginmathcalW$ and $ainmathbb R$. Show that this implies $f+acdot ginmathcalW$.





    share|cite|improve this answer




















      Your Answer




      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: false,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );








       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1373215%2freal-valued-continuous-functions-on-a-b-form-a-vector-space-with-respect-to-us%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest





























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      2
      down vote













      It is quite laborious, but it's not too difficult. In my experiences, students tend to struggle with this kind of question particularly simply because it's so straightforward, they think they're not doing it properly, and it doesn't feel like they've actually proven anything.



      Here, let me get you started. First, I'll address closure of the operations. Then I'll prove associativity of vector addition, then I'll establish the additive identity, and I'll leave you to do the rest.



      Suppose $f, g in C[a, b]$ and $lambda in mathbbR$. The definitions of addition and scalar multiplication are respectively,
      beginalign
      (f + g)(x) &:= f(x) + g(x) &forall x in [a, b] \
      (lambda f)(x) &:= lambda f(x) &forall x in [a, b]
      endalign
      By the algebra of continuous functions, $f + g$ and $lambda f$ are both continuous on $[a, b]$.



      Suppose $f, g, h$ are continuous on $[a, b]$. We must establish that $(f + g) + h = f + (g + h)$. That is, we must establish, for all $x in [a, b]$,
      $$((f + g) + h)(x) = (f + (g + h))(x).$$
      Suppose $x in [a, b]$. Using the definition of vector addition, as well as the associativity of real numbers, we get
      beginalign*
      ((f + g) + h)(x) &= (f + g)(x) + h(x) &ldots text definition \
      &= (f(x) + g(x)) + h(x) &ldots text definition \
      &= f(x) + (g(x) + h(x)) &ldots text associativity \
      &= f(x) + (g + h)(x) &ldots text definition \
      &= (f + (g + h))(x) &ldots text definition
      endalign*
      This holds for any $x in [a, b]$, so $(f + g) + h = f + (g + h)$.



      Finally, to establish the identity $mathbf0$, we must specify what it is. We let $mathbf0$ be the function that maps any $x in [a, b]$ to $0$. This is a constant function, hence it is continuous. We now must prove it is an identity, that is, $mathbf0 + f = f$ for any $f$.



      (In a wider sense, in order to establish $mathbf0$ is truly an identity, we would also need to prove $f + mathbf0 = f$, but you'll be proving commutativity later, which will make this redundant.)



      Suppose $f$ is continuous on $[a, b]$ and $x in [a, b]$. Then,
      $$(mathbf0 + f)(x) = mathbf0(x) + f(x) = 0 + f(x) = f(x).$$
      Therefore $mathbf0 + f = mathbf0$.



      Now you can establish the rest! You don't necessarily need as much detail as I'm using while writing it out, but you do need to cover all the axioms.






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        up vote
        2
        down vote













        It is quite laborious, but it's not too difficult. In my experiences, students tend to struggle with this kind of question particularly simply because it's so straightforward, they think they're not doing it properly, and it doesn't feel like they've actually proven anything.



        Here, let me get you started. First, I'll address closure of the operations. Then I'll prove associativity of vector addition, then I'll establish the additive identity, and I'll leave you to do the rest.



        Suppose $f, g in C[a, b]$ and $lambda in mathbbR$. The definitions of addition and scalar multiplication are respectively,
        beginalign
        (f + g)(x) &:= f(x) + g(x) &forall x in [a, b] \
        (lambda f)(x) &:= lambda f(x) &forall x in [a, b]
        endalign
        By the algebra of continuous functions, $f + g$ and $lambda f$ are both continuous on $[a, b]$.



        Suppose $f, g, h$ are continuous on $[a, b]$. We must establish that $(f + g) + h = f + (g + h)$. That is, we must establish, for all $x in [a, b]$,
        $$((f + g) + h)(x) = (f + (g + h))(x).$$
        Suppose $x in [a, b]$. Using the definition of vector addition, as well as the associativity of real numbers, we get
        beginalign*
        ((f + g) + h)(x) &= (f + g)(x) + h(x) &ldots text definition \
        &= (f(x) + g(x)) + h(x) &ldots text definition \
        &= f(x) + (g(x) + h(x)) &ldots text associativity \
        &= f(x) + (g + h)(x) &ldots text definition \
        &= (f + (g + h))(x) &ldots text definition
        endalign*
        This holds for any $x in [a, b]$, so $(f + g) + h = f + (g + h)$.



        Finally, to establish the identity $mathbf0$, we must specify what it is. We let $mathbf0$ be the function that maps any $x in [a, b]$ to $0$. This is a constant function, hence it is continuous. We now must prove it is an identity, that is, $mathbf0 + f = f$ for any $f$.



        (In a wider sense, in order to establish $mathbf0$ is truly an identity, we would also need to prove $f + mathbf0 = f$, but you'll be proving commutativity later, which will make this redundant.)



        Suppose $f$ is continuous on $[a, b]$ and $x in [a, b]$. Then,
        $$(mathbf0 + f)(x) = mathbf0(x) + f(x) = 0 + f(x) = f(x).$$
        Therefore $mathbf0 + f = mathbf0$.



        Now you can establish the rest! You don't necessarily need as much detail as I'm using while writing it out, but you do need to cover all the axioms.






        share|cite|improve this answer






















          up vote
          2
          down vote










          up vote
          2
          down vote









          It is quite laborious, but it's not too difficult. In my experiences, students tend to struggle with this kind of question particularly simply because it's so straightforward, they think they're not doing it properly, and it doesn't feel like they've actually proven anything.



          Here, let me get you started. First, I'll address closure of the operations. Then I'll prove associativity of vector addition, then I'll establish the additive identity, and I'll leave you to do the rest.



          Suppose $f, g in C[a, b]$ and $lambda in mathbbR$. The definitions of addition and scalar multiplication are respectively,
          beginalign
          (f + g)(x) &:= f(x) + g(x) &forall x in [a, b] \
          (lambda f)(x) &:= lambda f(x) &forall x in [a, b]
          endalign
          By the algebra of continuous functions, $f + g$ and $lambda f$ are both continuous on $[a, b]$.



          Suppose $f, g, h$ are continuous on $[a, b]$. We must establish that $(f + g) + h = f + (g + h)$. That is, we must establish, for all $x in [a, b]$,
          $$((f + g) + h)(x) = (f + (g + h))(x).$$
          Suppose $x in [a, b]$. Using the definition of vector addition, as well as the associativity of real numbers, we get
          beginalign*
          ((f + g) + h)(x) &= (f + g)(x) + h(x) &ldots text definition \
          &= (f(x) + g(x)) + h(x) &ldots text definition \
          &= f(x) + (g(x) + h(x)) &ldots text associativity \
          &= f(x) + (g + h)(x) &ldots text definition \
          &= (f + (g + h))(x) &ldots text definition
          endalign*
          This holds for any $x in [a, b]$, so $(f + g) + h = f + (g + h)$.



          Finally, to establish the identity $mathbf0$, we must specify what it is. We let $mathbf0$ be the function that maps any $x in [a, b]$ to $0$. This is a constant function, hence it is continuous. We now must prove it is an identity, that is, $mathbf0 + f = f$ for any $f$.



          (In a wider sense, in order to establish $mathbf0$ is truly an identity, we would also need to prove $f + mathbf0 = f$, but you'll be proving commutativity later, which will make this redundant.)



          Suppose $f$ is continuous on $[a, b]$ and $x in [a, b]$. Then,
          $$(mathbf0 + f)(x) = mathbf0(x) + f(x) = 0 + f(x) = f(x).$$
          Therefore $mathbf0 + f = mathbf0$.



          Now you can establish the rest! You don't necessarily need as much detail as I'm using while writing it out, but you do need to cover all the axioms.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          It is quite laborious, but it's not too difficult. In my experiences, students tend to struggle with this kind of question particularly simply because it's so straightforward, they think they're not doing it properly, and it doesn't feel like they've actually proven anything.



          Here, let me get you started. First, I'll address closure of the operations. Then I'll prove associativity of vector addition, then I'll establish the additive identity, and I'll leave you to do the rest.



          Suppose $f, g in C[a, b]$ and $lambda in mathbbR$. The definitions of addition and scalar multiplication are respectively,
          beginalign
          (f + g)(x) &:= f(x) + g(x) &forall x in [a, b] \
          (lambda f)(x) &:= lambda f(x) &forall x in [a, b]
          endalign
          By the algebra of continuous functions, $f + g$ and $lambda f$ are both continuous on $[a, b]$.



          Suppose $f, g, h$ are continuous on $[a, b]$. We must establish that $(f + g) + h = f + (g + h)$. That is, we must establish, for all $x in [a, b]$,
          $$((f + g) + h)(x) = (f + (g + h))(x).$$
          Suppose $x in [a, b]$. Using the definition of vector addition, as well as the associativity of real numbers, we get
          beginalign*
          ((f + g) + h)(x) &= (f + g)(x) + h(x) &ldots text definition \
          &= (f(x) + g(x)) + h(x) &ldots text definition \
          &= f(x) + (g(x) + h(x)) &ldots text associativity \
          &= f(x) + (g + h)(x) &ldots text definition \
          &= (f + (g + h))(x) &ldots text definition
          endalign*
          This holds for any $x in [a, b]$, so $(f + g) + h = f + (g + h)$.



          Finally, to establish the identity $mathbf0$, we must specify what it is. We let $mathbf0$ be the function that maps any $x in [a, b]$ to $0$. This is a constant function, hence it is continuous. We now must prove it is an identity, that is, $mathbf0 + f = f$ for any $f$.



          (In a wider sense, in order to establish $mathbf0$ is truly an identity, we would also need to prove $f + mathbf0 = f$, but you'll be proving commutativity later, which will make this redundant.)



          Suppose $f$ is continuous on $[a, b]$ and $x in [a, b]$. Then,
          $$(mathbf0 + f)(x) = mathbf0(x) + f(x) = 0 + f(x) = f(x).$$
          Therefore $mathbf0 + f = mathbf0$.



          Now you can establish the rest! You don't necessarily need as much detail as I'm using while writing it out, but you do need to cover all the axioms.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jul 25 '15 at 7:23









          Theo Bendit

          12.2k1844




          12.2k1844




















              up vote
              0
              down vote













              If you have to prove it without knowing anything about function spaces, @Theo Bendit has pointed out what you have to do. However, if you already know that $$mathcalV=f:mathbb Rrightarrowmathbb R$$ is a vector space, it is enough to show that $$mathcalW=f:mathbb Rrightarrowmathbb R~$$ is a subspace of of $mathcalV$.




              To prove that:



              • Show that the $fequiv 0inmathcalW$

              • Let $f,ginmathcalW$ and $ainmathbb R$. Show that this implies $f+acdot ginmathcalW$.





              share|cite|improve this answer
























                up vote
                0
                down vote













                If you have to prove it without knowing anything about function spaces, @Theo Bendit has pointed out what you have to do. However, if you already know that $$mathcalV=f:mathbb Rrightarrowmathbb R$$ is a vector space, it is enough to show that $$mathcalW=f:mathbb Rrightarrowmathbb R~$$ is a subspace of of $mathcalV$.




                To prove that:



                • Show that the $fequiv 0inmathcalW$

                • Let $f,ginmathcalW$ and $ainmathbb R$. Show that this implies $f+acdot ginmathcalW$.





                share|cite|improve this answer






















                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote









                  If you have to prove it without knowing anything about function spaces, @Theo Bendit has pointed out what you have to do. However, if you already know that $$mathcalV=f:mathbb Rrightarrowmathbb R$$ is a vector space, it is enough to show that $$mathcalW=f:mathbb Rrightarrowmathbb R~$$ is a subspace of of $mathcalV$.




                  To prove that:



                  • Show that the $fequiv 0inmathcalW$

                  • Let $f,ginmathcalW$ and $ainmathbb R$. Show that this implies $f+acdot ginmathcalW$.





                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  If you have to prove it without knowing anything about function spaces, @Theo Bendit has pointed out what you have to do. However, if you already know that $$mathcalV=f:mathbb Rrightarrowmathbb R$$ is a vector space, it is enough to show that $$mathcalW=f:mathbb Rrightarrowmathbb R~$$ is a subspace of of $mathcalV$.




                  To prove that:



                  • Show that the $fequiv 0inmathcalW$

                  • Let $f,ginmathcalW$ and $ainmathbb R$. Show that this implies $f+acdot ginmathcalW$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Jul 25 '15 at 8:14









                  Hirshy

                  4,31721336




                  4,31721336






















                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded


























                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1373215%2freal-valued-continuous-functions-on-a-b-form-a-vector-space-with-respect-to-us%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest













































































                      這個網誌中的熱門文章

                      How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

                      Carbon dioxide

                      Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?