limit of integration
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
We know $1leq m<n-1$, now I want to see what happens to following limit:
$$lim_deltarightarrow 0^+int_delta^2^delta t^-m-2sin^n-1(t) dt$$
I guess we don't have explicit result for the integration. So I think $sin(t)sim t$ as $trightarrow 0^+$, thus we see above is equivalent to
$$lim_deltarightarrow 0^+int_delta^2^deltat^n-m-3 dt=lim_deltarightarrow 0^+frac1n-m-2(delta^n-m-2-delta^2(n-m-2))=0$$
as long as $n-m-2> 0.$ Is my analysis correct?
calculus real-analysis
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
We know $1leq m<n-1$, now I want to see what happens to following limit:
$$lim_deltarightarrow 0^+int_delta^2^delta t^-m-2sin^n-1(t) dt$$
I guess we don't have explicit result for the integration. So I think $sin(t)sim t$ as $trightarrow 0^+$, thus we see above is equivalent to
$$lim_deltarightarrow 0^+int_delta^2^deltat^n-m-3 dt=lim_deltarightarrow 0^+frac1n-m-2(delta^n-m-2-delta^2(n-m-2))=0$$
as long as $n-m-2> 0.$ Is my analysis correct?
calculus real-analysis
Yes, it is correct.
â uniquesolution
Aug 9 at 19:40
@uniquesolution Thank you, I also convinced myself by expanding $sin(t)$, higher order terms would vanish.
â H-H
Aug 9 at 20:24
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
We know $1leq m<n-1$, now I want to see what happens to following limit:
$$lim_deltarightarrow 0^+int_delta^2^delta t^-m-2sin^n-1(t) dt$$
I guess we don't have explicit result for the integration. So I think $sin(t)sim t$ as $trightarrow 0^+$, thus we see above is equivalent to
$$lim_deltarightarrow 0^+int_delta^2^deltat^n-m-3 dt=lim_deltarightarrow 0^+frac1n-m-2(delta^n-m-2-delta^2(n-m-2))=0$$
as long as $n-m-2> 0.$ Is my analysis correct?
calculus real-analysis
We know $1leq m<n-1$, now I want to see what happens to following limit:
$$lim_deltarightarrow 0^+int_delta^2^delta t^-m-2sin^n-1(t) dt$$
I guess we don't have explicit result for the integration. So I think $sin(t)sim t$ as $trightarrow 0^+$, thus we see above is equivalent to
$$lim_deltarightarrow 0^+int_delta^2^deltat^n-m-3 dt=lim_deltarightarrow 0^+frac1n-m-2(delta^n-m-2-delta^2(n-m-2))=0$$
as long as $n-m-2> 0.$ Is my analysis correct?
calculus real-analysis
edited Aug 9 at 20:23
asked Aug 9 at 17:42
H-H
30118
30118
Yes, it is correct.
â uniquesolution
Aug 9 at 19:40
@uniquesolution Thank you, I also convinced myself by expanding $sin(t)$, higher order terms would vanish.
â H-H
Aug 9 at 20:24
add a comment |Â
Yes, it is correct.
â uniquesolution
Aug 9 at 19:40
@uniquesolution Thank you, I also convinced myself by expanding $sin(t)$, higher order terms would vanish.
â H-H
Aug 9 at 20:24
Yes, it is correct.
â uniquesolution
Aug 9 at 19:40
Yes, it is correct.
â uniquesolution
Aug 9 at 19:40
@uniquesolution Thank you, I also convinced myself by expanding $sin(t)$, higher order terms would vanish.
â H-H
Aug 9 at 20:24
@uniquesolution Thank you, I also convinced myself by expanding $sin(t)$, higher order terms would vanish.
â H-H
Aug 9 at 20:24
add a comment |Â
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2877506%2flimit-of-integration%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Yes, it is correct.
â uniquesolution
Aug 9 at 19:40
@uniquesolution Thank you, I also convinced myself by expanding $sin(t)$, higher order terms would vanish.
â H-H
Aug 9 at 20:24