I have a sphere $S^2$, how can I define it?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I'm not sure how to say, using proper mathematical notation, a sphere $S^2$ is equal to the basic unit sphere $1=x^2 + y^2 + z^2$. Just looking for a quick answer, thank you.
notation
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I'm not sure how to say, using proper mathematical notation, a sphere $S^2$ is equal to the basic unit sphere $1=x^2 + y^2 + z^2$. Just looking for a quick answer, thank you.
notation
How can you define it? You just have defined it!
â Dietrich Burde
Aug 9 at 19:10
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I'm not sure how to say, using proper mathematical notation, a sphere $S^2$ is equal to the basic unit sphere $1=x^2 + y^2 + z^2$. Just looking for a quick answer, thank you.
notation
I'm not sure how to say, using proper mathematical notation, a sphere $S^2$ is equal to the basic unit sphere $1=x^2 + y^2 + z^2$. Just looking for a quick answer, thank you.
notation
asked Aug 9 at 19:05
John Miller
926
926
How can you define it? You just have defined it!
â Dietrich Burde
Aug 9 at 19:10
add a comment |Â
How can you define it? You just have defined it!
â Dietrich Burde
Aug 9 at 19:10
How can you define it? You just have defined it!
â Dietrich Burde
Aug 9 at 19:10
How can you define it? You just have defined it!
â Dietrich Burde
Aug 9 at 19:10
add a comment |Â
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
Using set builder notation:
$$S=(x,y,z)in Bbb R^3mid x^2+y^2+z^2=1$$
If it is clear that the ambient space is $Bbb R^3$ and you don't feel that it's necessary to specify it, a possible shortcut is simply
$$S=x^2+y^2+z^2=1$$
Would it not be $x,y,z in Bbb R$?
â Tyler6
Aug 9 at 19:10
2
@Tyler6 Not if you write brackets around, then the object is the whole triple, and as a triple it lives in $Bbb R^3$.
â Arnaud Mortier
Aug 9 at 19:11
@Tyler6 there is no difference between saying $(x,y,z)inBbb R^3$ and saying $xin Bbb R$ and $yinBbb R$ and $zin Bbb R$. Saying $x,y,zinBbb R$ is just shorthand for the second. $~x,y,zinBbb R,~x^2+y^2+z^2=1$ is the same set as written in the post above.
â JMoravitz
Aug 9 at 19:11
Ah ok, I was just mistaken as I thought that since they were being treated as variables we couldnâÂÂt define them as a vector
â Tyler6
Aug 9 at 19:12
1
@Tyler6 (continuation of JMoravitz and Dietrich's comments): but here you have to use this notation because each element of your sphere is represented by a triple $(x,y,z)$.
â Arnaud Mortier
Aug 9 at 19:13
 |Â
show 5 more comments
up vote
0
down vote
Yes for $(x,y,z) in mathbbR^3$ the cartesian equation for a sphere centered at the origin and with radius $R$ is
$$x^2+y^2+z^2=R^2$$
and more in general with center in $C=(a,b,c)$
$$(x-a)^2+(y-b)^2+(z-c)^2=R^2$$
Note that the equation is derived from Pytagorean Theorem, that is
$$R= sqrt(x-a)^2+(y-b)^2+(z-c)^2$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
There seems to be a difference in notation between geometers (the number denoting the dimension of the coordinate space) and topologists (the number denoting the dimension of the surface).
See introduction here.
add a comment |Â
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
Using set builder notation:
$$S=(x,y,z)in Bbb R^3mid x^2+y^2+z^2=1$$
If it is clear that the ambient space is $Bbb R^3$ and you don't feel that it's necessary to specify it, a possible shortcut is simply
$$S=x^2+y^2+z^2=1$$
Would it not be $x,y,z in Bbb R$?
â Tyler6
Aug 9 at 19:10
2
@Tyler6 Not if you write brackets around, then the object is the whole triple, and as a triple it lives in $Bbb R^3$.
â Arnaud Mortier
Aug 9 at 19:11
@Tyler6 there is no difference between saying $(x,y,z)inBbb R^3$ and saying $xin Bbb R$ and $yinBbb R$ and $zin Bbb R$. Saying $x,y,zinBbb R$ is just shorthand for the second. $~x,y,zinBbb R,~x^2+y^2+z^2=1$ is the same set as written in the post above.
â JMoravitz
Aug 9 at 19:11
Ah ok, I was just mistaken as I thought that since they were being treated as variables we couldnâÂÂt define them as a vector
â Tyler6
Aug 9 at 19:12
1
@Tyler6 (continuation of JMoravitz and Dietrich's comments): but here you have to use this notation because each element of your sphere is represented by a triple $(x,y,z)$.
â Arnaud Mortier
Aug 9 at 19:13
 |Â
show 5 more comments
up vote
3
down vote
Using set builder notation:
$$S=(x,y,z)in Bbb R^3mid x^2+y^2+z^2=1$$
If it is clear that the ambient space is $Bbb R^3$ and you don't feel that it's necessary to specify it, a possible shortcut is simply
$$S=x^2+y^2+z^2=1$$
Would it not be $x,y,z in Bbb R$?
â Tyler6
Aug 9 at 19:10
2
@Tyler6 Not if you write brackets around, then the object is the whole triple, and as a triple it lives in $Bbb R^3$.
â Arnaud Mortier
Aug 9 at 19:11
@Tyler6 there is no difference between saying $(x,y,z)inBbb R^3$ and saying $xin Bbb R$ and $yinBbb R$ and $zin Bbb R$. Saying $x,y,zinBbb R$ is just shorthand for the second. $~x,y,zinBbb R,~x^2+y^2+z^2=1$ is the same set as written in the post above.
â JMoravitz
Aug 9 at 19:11
Ah ok, I was just mistaken as I thought that since they were being treated as variables we couldnâÂÂt define them as a vector
â Tyler6
Aug 9 at 19:12
1
@Tyler6 (continuation of JMoravitz and Dietrich's comments): but here you have to use this notation because each element of your sphere is represented by a triple $(x,y,z)$.
â Arnaud Mortier
Aug 9 at 19:13
 |Â
show 5 more comments
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
Using set builder notation:
$$S=(x,y,z)in Bbb R^3mid x^2+y^2+z^2=1$$
If it is clear that the ambient space is $Bbb R^3$ and you don't feel that it's necessary to specify it, a possible shortcut is simply
$$S=x^2+y^2+z^2=1$$
Using set builder notation:
$$S=(x,y,z)in Bbb R^3mid x^2+y^2+z^2=1$$
If it is clear that the ambient space is $Bbb R^3$ and you don't feel that it's necessary to specify it, a possible shortcut is simply
$$S=x^2+y^2+z^2=1$$
answered Aug 9 at 19:09
Arnaud Mortier
19.2k22159
19.2k22159
Would it not be $x,y,z in Bbb R$?
â Tyler6
Aug 9 at 19:10
2
@Tyler6 Not if you write brackets around, then the object is the whole triple, and as a triple it lives in $Bbb R^3$.
â Arnaud Mortier
Aug 9 at 19:11
@Tyler6 there is no difference between saying $(x,y,z)inBbb R^3$ and saying $xin Bbb R$ and $yinBbb R$ and $zin Bbb R$. Saying $x,y,zinBbb R$ is just shorthand for the second. $~x,y,zinBbb R,~x^2+y^2+z^2=1$ is the same set as written in the post above.
â JMoravitz
Aug 9 at 19:11
Ah ok, I was just mistaken as I thought that since they were being treated as variables we couldnâÂÂt define them as a vector
â Tyler6
Aug 9 at 19:12
1
@Tyler6 (continuation of JMoravitz and Dietrich's comments): but here you have to use this notation because each element of your sphere is represented by a triple $(x,y,z)$.
â Arnaud Mortier
Aug 9 at 19:13
 |Â
show 5 more comments
Would it not be $x,y,z in Bbb R$?
â Tyler6
Aug 9 at 19:10
2
@Tyler6 Not if you write brackets around, then the object is the whole triple, and as a triple it lives in $Bbb R^3$.
â Arnaud Mortier
Aug 9 at 19:11
@Tyler6 there is no difference between saying $(x,y,z)inBbb R^3$ and saying $xin Bbb R$ and $yinBbb R$ and $zin Bbb R$. Saying $x,y,zinBbb R$ is just shorthand for the second. $~x,y,zinBbb R,~x^2+y^2+z^2=1$ is the same set as written in the post above.
â JMoravitz
Aug 9 at 19:11
Ah ok, I was just mistaken as I thought that since they were being treated as variables we couldnâÂÂt define them as a vector
â Tyler6
Aug 9 at 19:12
1
@Tyler6 (continuation of JMoravitz and Dietrich's comments): but here you have to use this notation because each element of your sphere is represented by a triple $(x,y,z)$.
â Arnaud Mortier
Aug 9 at 19:13
Would it not be $x,y,z in Bbb R$?
â Tyler6
Aug 9 at 19:10
Would it not be $x,y,z in Bbb R$?
â Tyler6
Aug 9 at 19:10
2
2
@Tyler6 Not if you write brackets around, then the object is the whole triple, and as a triple it lives in $Bbb R^3$.
â Arnaud Mortier
Aug 9 at 19:11
@Tyler6 Not if you write brackets around, then the object is the whole triple, and as a triple it lives in $Bbb R^3$.
â Arnaud Mortier
Aug 9 at 19:11
@Tyler6 there is no difference between saying $(x,y,z)inBbb R^3$ and saying $xin Bbb R$ and $yinBbb R$ and $zin Bbb R$. Saying $x,y,zinBbb R$ is just shorthand for the second. $~x,y,zinBbb R,~x^2+y^2+z^2=1$ is the same set as written in the post above.
â JMoravitz
Aug 9 at 19:11
@Tyler6 there is no difference between saying $(x,y,z)inBbb R^3$ and saying $xin Bbb R$ and $yinBbb R$ and $zin Bbb R$. Saying $x,y,zinBbb R$ is just shorthand for the second. $~x,y,zinBbb R,~x^2+y^2+z^2=1$ is the same set as written in the post above.
â JMoravitz
Aug 9 at 19:11
Ah ok, I was just mistaken as I thought that since they were being treated as variables we couldnâÂÂt define them as a vector
â Tyler6
Aug 9 at 19:12
Ah ok, I was just mistaken as I thought that since they were being treated as variables we couldnâÂÂt define them as a vector
â Tyler6
Aug 9 at 19:12
1
1
@Tyler6 (continuation of JMoravitz and Dietrich's comments): but here you have to use this notation because each element of your sphere is represented by a triple $(x,y,z)$.
â Arnaud Mortier
Aug 9 at 19:13
@Tyler6 (continuation of JMoravitz and Dietrich's comments): but here you have to use this notation because each element of your sphere is represented by a triple $(x,y,z)$.
â Arnaud Mortier
Aug 9 at 19:13
 |Â
show 5 more comments
up vote
0
down vote
Yes for $(x,y,z) in mathbbR^3$ the cartesian equation for a sphere centered at the origin and with radius $R$ is
$$x^2+y^2+z^2=R^2$$
and more in general with center in $C=(a,b,c)$
$$(x-a)^2+(y-b)^2+(z-c)^2=R^2$$
Note that the equation is derived from Pytagorean Theorem, that is
$$R= sqrt(x-a)^2+(y-b)^2+(z-c)^2$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Yes for $(x,y,z) in mathbbR^3$ the cartesian equation for a sphere centered at the origin and with radius $R$ is
$$x^2+y^2+z^2=R^2$$
and more in general with center in $C=(a,b,c)$
$$(x-a)^2+(y-b)^2+(z-c)^2=R^2$$
Note that the equation is derived from Pytagorean Theorem, that is
$$R= sqrt(x-a)^2+(y-b)^2+(z-c)^2$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Yes for $(x,y,z) in mathbbR^3$ the cartesian equation for a sphere centered at the origin and with radius $R$ is
$$x^2+y^2+z^2=R^2$$
and more in general with center in $C=(a,b,c)$
$$(x-a)^2+(y-b)^2+(z-c)^2=R^2$$
Note that the equation is derived from Pytagorean Theorem, that is
$$R= sqrt(x-a)^2+(y-b)^2+(z-c)^2$$
Yes for $(x,y,z) in mathbbR^3$ the cartesian equation for a sphere centered at the origin and with radius $R$ is
$$x^2+y^2+z^2=R^2$$
and more in general with center in $C=(a,b,c)$
$$(x-a)^2+(y-b)^2+(z-c)^2=R^2$$
Note that the equation is derived from Pytagorean Theorem, that is
$$R= sqrt(x-a)^2+(y-b)^2+(z-c)^2$$
answered Aug 9 at 19:07
gimusi
65.9k73684
65.9k73684
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
There seems to be a difference in notation between geometers (the number denoting the dimension of the coordinate space) and topologists (the number denoting the dimension of the surface).
See introduction here.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
There seems to be a difference in notation between geometers (the number denoting the dimension of the coordinate space) and topologists (the number denoting the dimension of the surface).
See introduction here.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
There seems to be a difference in notation between geometers (the number denoting the dimension of the coordinate space) and topologists (the number denoting the dimension of the surface).
See introduction here.
There seems to be a difference in notation between geometers (the number denoting the dimension of the coordinate space) and topologists (the number denoting the dimension of the surface).
See introduction here.
answered Aug 9 at 19:35
mvw
30.6k22251
30.6k22251
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2877590%2fi-have-a-sphere-s2-how-can-i-define-it%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
How can you define it? You just have defined it!
â Dietrich Burde
Aug 9 at 19:10