Lie-Cartan coordinates of the first kind vs Lie-Cartan coordinates of the second kind

Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Lie-Cartan coordinates of the first kind:
$$
R_1 = exp(alpha_1w_1 + alpha_2w_2+alpha_3w_3)
$$
Lie-Cartan coordinates of the second kind:
$$
R_2 = exp(beta_1w_1) exp(beta_2w_2) exp(beta_3w_3)
$$
My problem is are these two different?
For $exp$ we have
$$
b^a+b = b^ab^b,
$$
does this not apply to matrices?
matrices rotations
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Lie-Cartan coordinates of the first kind:
$$
R_1 = exp(alpha_1w_1 + alpha_2w_2+alpha_3w_3)
$$
Lie-Cartan coordinates of the second kind:
$$
R_2 = exp(beta_1w_1) exp(beta_2w_2) exp(beta_3w_3)
$$
My problem is are these two different?
For $exp$ we have
$$
b^a+b = b^ab^b,
$$
does this not apply to matrices?
matrices rotations
In general, they differ unless $[w_i, w_j] =0$. We have the equality for matrices if they commute.
â Berci
Aug 26 at 20:02
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Lie-Cartan coordinates of the first kind:
$$
R_1 = exp(alpha_1w_1 + alpha_2w_2+alpha_3w_3)
$$
Lie-Cartan coordinates of the second kind:
$$
R_2 = exp(beta_1w_1) exp(beta_2w_2) exp(beta_3w_3)
$$
My problem is are these two different?
For $exp$ we have
$$
b^a+b = b^ab^b,
$$
does this not apply to matrices?
matrices rotations
Lie-Cartan coordinates of the first kind:
$$
R_1 = exp(alpha_1w_1 + alpha_2w_2+alpha_3w_3)
$$
Lie-Cartan coordinates of the second kind:
$$
R_2 = exp(beta_1w_1) exp(beta_2w_2) exp(beta_3w_3)
$$
My problem is are these two different?
For $exp$ we have
$$
b^a+b = b^ab^b,
$$
does this not apply to matrices?
matrices rotations
edited Aug 26 at 19:44
Jendrik Stelzner
7,63121037
7,63121037
asked Aug 26 at 19:41
user2660324
1
1
In general, they differ unless $[w_i, w_j] =0$. We have the equality for matrices if they commute.
â Berci
Aug 26 at 20:02
add a comment |Â
In general, they differ unless $[w_i, w_j] =0$. We have the equality for matrices if they commute.
â Berci
Aug 26 at 20:02
In general, they differ unless $[w_i, w_j] =0$. We have the equality for matrices if they commute.
â Berci
Aug 26 at 20:02
In general, they differ unless $[w_i, w_j] =0$. We have the equality for matrices if they commute.
â Berci
Aug 26 at 20:02
add a comment |Â
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2895437%2flie-cartan-coordinates-of-the-first-kind-vs-lie-cartan-coordinates-of-the-second%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
In general, they differ unless $[w_i, w_j] =0$. We have the equality for matrices if they commute.
â Berci
Aug 26 at 20:02