Showing that $f(x)=1$ if $x=frac1n$, $0$ otherwise on [0,1] is Riemann Integrable

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I have to show that the following function $f:[0,1]rightarrowmathbbR$ is Riemann Integrable:



$$f(x) =
left{
beginarrayll
1 & mboxif x = frac1n \
0 & mboxotherwise
endarray
right.$$



For the upper and lower Riemann sum I am using the following definitions:



$$S_l(f,V)=sum^n_j=1inf_I(j)(f)(x_j-x_j-1)$$



With $I(j)$ denoting the interval $[x_j-1,x_j$] and $V$ is a partition $V=0,x_1,...,1$. The upper sum is defined with the supremum. I have shown that for any partition on $[0,1]$ the lower sum is $0$. But now I need to prove that for every $epsilon>0$ there is a partition $V$ such that $S_u(f,V)<epsilon$. Completing the proof is easy. I see that any partition on $[0,1]$ will only contain a limited number of points of the set $frac1n:ninmathbbN$. But I can't make the proof concrete. Could anybody help me out?







share|cite|improve this question
























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite












    I have to show that the following function $f:[0,1]rightarrowmathbbR$ is Riemann Integrable:



    $$f(x) =
    left{
    beginarrayll
    1 & mboxif x = frac1n \
    0 & mboxotherwise
    endarray
    right.$$



    For the upper and lower Riemann sum I am using the following definitions:



    $$S_l(f,V)=sum^n_j=1inf_I(j)(f)(x_j-x_j-1)$$



    With $I(j)$ denoting the interval $[x_j-1,x_j$] and $V$ is a partition $V=0,x_1,...,1$. The upper sum is defined with the supremum. I have shown that for any partition on $[0,1]$ the lower sum is $0$. But now I need to prove that for every $epsilon>0$ there is a partition $V$ such that $S_u(f,V)<epsilon$. Completing the proof is easy. I see that any partition on $[0,1]$ will only contain a limited number of points of the set $frac1n:ninmathbbN$. But I can't make the proof concrete. Could anybody help me out?







    share|cite|improve this question






















      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite











      I have to show that the following function $f:[0,1]rightarrowmathbbR$ is Riemann Integrable:



      $$f(x) =
      left{
      beginarrayll
      1 & mboxif x = frac1n \
      0 & mboxotherwise
      endarray
      right.$$



      For the upper and lower Riemann sum I am using the following definitions:



      $$S_l(f,V)=sum^n_j=1inf_I(j)(f)(x_j-x_j-1)$$



      With $I(j)$ denoting the interval $[x_j-1,x_j$] and $V$ is a partition $V=0,x_1,...,1$. The upper sum is defined with the supremum. I have shown that for any partition on $[0,1]$ the lower sum is $0$. But now I need to prove that for every $epsilon>0$ there is a partition $V$ such that $S_u(f,V)<epsilon$. Completing the proof is easy. I see that any partition on $[0,1]$ will only contain a limited number of points of the set $frac1n:ninmathbbN$. But I can't make the proof concrete. Could anybody help me out?







      share|cite|improve this question












      I have to show that the following function $f:[0,1]rightarrowmathbbR$ is Riemann Integrable:



      $$f(x) =
      left{
      beginarrayll
      1 & mboxif x = frac1n \
      0 & mboxotherwise
      endarray
      right.$$



      For the upper and lower Riemann sum I am using the following definitions:



      $$S_l(f,V)=sum^n_j=1inf_I(j)(f)(x_j-x_j-1)$$



      With $I(j)$ denoting the interval $[x_j-1,x_j$] and $V$ is a partition $V=0,x_1,...,1$. The upper sum is defined with the supremum. I have shown that for any partition on $[0,1]$ the lower sum is $0$. But now I need to prove that for every $epsilon>0$ there is a partition $V$ such that $S_u(f,V)<epsilon$. Completing the proof is easy. I see that any partition on $[0,1]$ will only contain a limited number of points of the set $frac1n:ninmathbbN$. But I can't make the proof concrete. Could anybody help me out?









      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jun 20 '14 at 13:44









      Gehaktmolen

      16611




      16611




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Try the following:



          The set $F=xin [0,1]: f(x)>epsilon $ is finite for every $epsilon>0$. Then you can form a partition such that if an interval contains some $xin F$ then it have no other. Finally you can choose the partition such that the sum of interval who contains some $xin F$ is $<epsilon$. Separate the interval wich cover $F$ and those which don't.



          Can you continue from this?






          share|cite|improve this answer



























            up vote
            0
            down vote













            $ou have the right idea. It's all about the technicalities. One possible partition set-up is as follows.



            For every $epsilon>0$, there exists an integer $N_0$ such that $1/N_0<epsilon$. Let $N=maxN_0,5$.



            Partition $[0,1]$ with $V=0,x_1, x_2,ldots,x_4N-5$ where $x_1=frac12N$, $x_4N-5=1$, $x_2k+1-x_2k=frac1N^3$, and $x_2k<frac12N-k<x_2k+1$.



            Then, $$S_u(f,V)= 1cdot frac12N + frac1N^3 cdot (2N-1)<frac12N+frac2NN^3=frac12N+frac2N^2$$.



            Since $Nge 5$, $frac2N^2<frac12N$. Therefore, $S_u(f,V)<frac1N<epsilon$.






            share|cite|improve this answer




















              Your Answer




              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              );
              );
              , "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: false,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













               

              draft saved


              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f840700%2fshowing-that-fx-1-if-x-frac1n-0-otherwise-on-0-1-is-riemann-inte%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest






























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              0
              down vote













              Try the following:



              The set $F=xin [0,1]: f(x)>epsilon $ is finite for every $epsilon>0$. Then you can form a partition such that if an interval contains some $xin F$ then it have no other. Finally you can choose the partition such that the sum of interval who contains some $xin F$ is $<epsilon$. Separate the interval wich cover $F$ and those which don't.



              Can you continue from this?






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                up vote
                0
                down vote













                Try the following:



                The set $F=xin [0,1]: f(x)>epsilon $ is finite for every $epsilon>0$. Then you can form a partition such that if an interval contains some $xin F$ then it have no other. Finally you can choose the partition such that the sum of interval who contains some $xin F$ is $<epsilon$. Separate the interval wich cover $F$ and those which don't.



                Can you continue from this?






                share|cite|improve this answer






















                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote









                  Try the following:



                  The set $F=xin [0,1]: f(x)>epsilon $ is finite for every $epsilon>0$. Then you can form a partition such that if an interval contains some $xin F$ then it have no other. Finally you can choose the partition such that the sum of interval who contains some $xin F$ is $<epsilon$. Separate the interval wich cover $F$ and those which don't.



                  Can you continue from this?






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  Try the following:



                  The set $F=xin [0,1]: f(x)>epsilon $ is finite for every $epsilon>0$. Then you can form a partition such that if an interval contains some $xin F$ then it have no other. Finally you can choose the partition such that the sum of interval who contains some $xin F$ is $<epsilon$. Separate the interval wich cover $F$ and those which don't.



                  Can you continue from this?







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Jun 20 '14 at 14:12









                  YTS

                  2,115724




                  2,115724




















                      up vote
                      0
                      down vote













                      $ou have the right idea. It's all about the technicalities. One possible partition set-up is as follows.



                      For every $epsilon>0$, there exists an integer $N_0$ such that $1/N_0<epsilon$. Let $N=maxN_0,5$.



                      Partition $[0,1]$ with $V=0,x_1, x_2,ldots,x_4N-5$ where $x_1=frac12N$, $x_4N-5=1$, $x_2k+1-x_2k=frac1N^3$, and $x_2k<frac12N-k<x_2k+1$.



                      Then, $$S_u(f,V)= 1cdot frac12N + frac1N^3 cdot (2N-1)<frac12N+frac2NN^3=frac12N+frac2N^2$$.



                      Since $Nge 5$, $frac2N^2<frac12N$. Therefore, $S_u(f,V)<frac1N<epsilon$.






                      share|cite|improve this answer
























                        up vote
                        0
                        down vote













                        $ou have the right idea. It's all about the technicalities. One possible partition set-up is as follows.



                        For every $epsilon>0$, there exists an integer $N_0$ such that $1/N_0<epsilon$. Let $N=maxN_0,5$.



                        Partition $[0,1]$ with $V=0,x_1, x_2,ldots,x_4N-5$ where $x_1=frac12N$, $x_4N-5=1$, $x_2k+1-x_2k=frac1N^3$, and $x_2k<frac12N-k<x_2k+1$.



                        Then, $$S_u(f,V)= 1cdot frac12N + frac1N^3 cdot (2N-1)<frac12N+frac2NN^3=frac12N+frac2N^2$$.



                        Since $Nge 5$, $frac2N^2<frac12N$. Therefore, $S_u(f,V)<frac1N<epsilon$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer






















                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote









                          $ou have the right idea. It's all about the technicalities. One possible partition set-up is as follows.



                          For every $epsilon>0$, there exists an integer $N_0$ such that $1/N_0<epsilon$. Let $N=maxN_0,5$.



                          Partition $[0,1]$ with $V=0,x_1, x_2,ldots,x_4N-5$ where $x_1=frac12N$, $x_4N-5=1$, $x_2k+1-x_2k=frac1N^3$, and $x_2k<frac12N-k<x_2k+1$.



                          Then, $$S_u(f,V)= 1cdot frac12N + frac1N^3 cdot (2N-1)<frac12N+frac2NN^3=frac12N+frac2N^2$$.



                          Since $Nge 5$, $frac2N^2<frac12N$. Therefore, $S_u(f,V)<frac1N<epsilon$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          $ou have the right idea. It's all about the technicalities. One possible partition set-up is as follows.



                          For every $epsilon>0$, there exists an integer $N_0$ such that $1/N_0<epsilon$. Let $N=maxN_0,5$.



                          Partition $[0,1]$ with $V=0,x_1, x_2,ldots,x_4N-5$ where $x_1=frac12N$, $x_4N-5=1$, $x_2k+1-x_2k=frac1N^3$, and $x_2k<frac12N-k<x_2k+1$.



                          Then, $$S_u(f,V)= 1cdot frac12N + frac1N^3 cdot (2N-1)<frac12N+frac2NN^3=frac12N+frac2N^2$$.



                          Since $Nge 5$, $frac2N^2<frac12N$. Therefore, $S_u(f,V)<frac1N<epsilon$.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Jun 20 '14 at 14:13









                          Badoe

                          385111




                          385111



























                               

                              draft saved


                              draft discarded















































                               


                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f840700%2fshowing-that-fx-1-if-x-frac1n-0-otherwise-on-0-1-is-riemann-inte%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest













































































                              這個網誌中的熱門文章

                              How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

                              Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

                              Carbon dioxide