epsilon delta limit proof verification of $lim_xto2fracx-1x^2-1 = frac13 $.
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I just want to verify the preliminary work of my epsilon delta proof for this one.
$$lim_xrightarrow 2fracx-1x^2-1 = frac13 $$
$underlinetextprelimnary work$
$forall epsilon>0, exists delta>0$ $s.t.$
$|x-2|<deltaRightarrow left|fracx-1x^2-1-frac13right|<epsilon$
we know
$$left|fracx-1x^2-1-frac13right| =
left|frac(x-1)(x-2)3(x-1)(x+1)right|$$
now we take $x>1$ to cancel $x-1$;
we pick $delta<a$ such that $2-a>1$ i.e. $0<a<1$; therefore $delta< 0.5$ will do. Thus, $delta<0.5$ therefore $|x-2|<delta<0.5$
$$1.5<x<2.5$$
now we have
$$left|frac(x-1)(x-2)3(x-1)(x+1)right| = left|frac(x-2)3(x+1)right|<|x-2|<epsilon $$
hence $delta = min(0.5, epsilon)$
$underlinetextproof$
take $delta = 0.5$ or $delta = epsilon ...$
is there anything wrong with my proof? Crtisim is highly appreciated
calculus proof-verification epsilon-delta
 |Â
show 3 more comments
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I just want to verify the preliminary work of my epsilon delta proof for this one.
$$lim_xrightarrow 2fracx-1x^2-1 = frac13 $$
$underlinetextprelimnary work$
$forall epsilon>0, exists delta>0$ $s.t.$
$|x-2|<deltaRightarrow left|fracx-1x^2-1-frac13right|<epsilon$
we know
$$left|fracx-1x^2-1-frac13right| =
left|frac(x-1)(x-2)3(x-1)(x+1)right|$$
now we take $x>1$ to cancel $x-1$;
we pick $delta<a$ such that $2-a>1$ i.e. $0<a<1$; therefore $delta< 0.5$ will do. Thus, $delta<0.5$ therefore $|x-2|<delta<0.5$
$$1.5<x<2.5$$
now we have
$$left|frac(x-1)(x-2)3(x-1)(x+1)right| = left|frac(x-2)3(x+1)right|<|x-2|<epsilon $$
hence $delta = min(0.5, epsilon)$
$underlinetextproof$
take $delta = 0.5$ or $delta = epsilon ...$
is there anything wrong with my proof? Crtisim is highly appreciated
calculus proof-verification epsilon-delta
1
Showing the preliminary work and just a start of the proof doesn't count as showing the proof.
â md2perpe
Aug 26 at 20:50
@md2perpe i just want to verify whether the preliminary work is correct first :)
â Erik Hambardzumyan
Aug 26 at 20:51
@md2perpe i've edited the quesiton just now
â Erik Hambardzumyan
Aug 26 at 20:52
We don't need $x > 1$ to cancel $x-1.$ We only need $x neq 1.$
â md2perpe
Aug 26 at 20:59
1
The proof looks okay to me. I would make some changes in the exposition, but in essence it's correct.
â Ãµ-ô
Aug 26 at 21:01
 |Â
show 3 more comments
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I just want to verify the preliminary work of my epsilon delta proof for this one.
$$lim_xrightarrow 2fracx-1x^2-1 = frac13 $$
$underlinetextprelimnary work$
$forall epsilon>0, exists delta>0$ $s.t.$
$|x-2|<deltaRightarrow left|fracx-1x^2-1-frac13right|<epsilon$
we know
$$left|fracx-1x^2-1-frac13right| =
left|frac(x-1)(x-2)3(x-1)(x+1)right|$$
now we take $x>1$ to cancel $x-1$;
we pick $delta<a$ such that $2-a>1$ i.e. $0<a<1$; therefore $delta< 0.5$ will do. Thus, $delta<0.5$ therefore $|x-2|<delta<0.5$
$$1.5<x<2.5$$
now we have
$$left|frac(x-1)(x-2)3(x-1)(x+1)right| = left|frac(x-2)3(x+1)right|<|x-2|<epsilon $$
hence $delta = min(0.5, epsilon)$
$underlinetextproof$
take $delta = 0.5$ or $delta = epsilon ...$
is there anything wrong with my proof? Crtisim is highly appreciated
calculus proof-verification epsilon-delta
I just want to verify the preliminary work of my epsilon delta proof for this one.
$$lim_xrightarrow 2fracx-1x^2-1 = frac13 $$
$underlinetextprelimnary work$
$forall epsilon>0, exists delta>0$ $s.t.$
$|x-2|<deltaRightarrow left|fracx-1x^2-1-frac13right|<epsilon$
we know
$$left|fracx-1x^2-1-frac13right| =
left|frac(x-1)(x-2)3(x-1)(x+1)right|$$
now we take $x>1$ to cancel $x-1$;
we pick $delta<a$ such that $2-a>1$ i.e. $0<a<1$; therefore $delta< 0.5$ will do. Thus, $delta<0.5$ therefore $|x-2|<delta<0.5$
$$1.5<x<2.5$$
now we have
$$left|frac(x-1)(x-2)3(x-1)(x+1)right| = left|frac(x-2)3(x+1)right|<|x-2|<epsilon $$
hence $delta = min(0.5, epsilon)$
$underlinetextproof$
take $delta = 0.5$ or $delta = epsilon ...$
is there anything wrong with my proof? Crtisim is highly appreciated
calculus proof-verification epsilon-delta
edited Aug 27 at 11:50
asked Aug 26 at 20:44
Erik Hambardzumyan
1568
1568
1
Showing the preliminary work and just a start of the proof doesn't count as showing the proof.
â md2perpe
Aug 26 at 20:50
@md2perpe i just want to verify whether the preliminary work is correct first :)
â Erik Hambardzumyan
Aug 26 at 20:51
@md2perpe i've edited the quesiton just now
â Erik Hambardzumyan
Aug 26 at 20:52
We don't need $x > 1$ to cancel $x-1.$ We only need $x neq 1.$
â md2perpe
Aug 26 at 20:59
1
The proof looks okay to me. I would make some changes in the exposition, but in essence it's correct.
â Ãµ-ô
Aug 26 at 21:01
 |Â
show 3 more comments
1
Showing the preliminary work and just a start of the proof doesn't count as showing the proof.
â md2perpe
Aug 26 at 20:50
@md2perpe i just want to verify whether the preliminary work is correct first :)
â Erik Hambardzumyan
Aug 26 at 20:51
@md2perpe i've edited the quesiton just now
â Erik Hambardzumyan
Aug 26 at 20:52
We don't need $x > 1$ to cancel $x-1.$ We only need $x neq 1.$
â md2perpe
Aug 26 at 20:59
1
The proof looks okay to me. I would make some changes in the exposition, but in essence it's correct.
â Ãµ-ô
Aug 26 at 21:01
1
1
Showing the preliminary work and just a start of the proof doesn't count as showing the proof.
â md2perpe
Aug 26 at 20:50
Showing the preliminary work and just a start of the proof doesn't count as showing the proof.
â md2perpe
Aug 26 at 20:50
@md2perpe i just want to verify whether the preliminary work is correct first :)
â Erik Hambardzumyan
Aug 26 at 20:51
@md2perpe i just want to verify whether the preliminary work is correct first :)
â Erik Hambardzumyan
Aug 26 at 20:51
@md2perpe i've edited the quesiton just now
â Erik Hambardzumyan
Aug 26 at 20:52
@md2perpe i've edited the quesiton just now
â Erik Hambardzumyan
Aug 26 at 20:52
We don't need $x > 1$ to cancel $x-1.$ We only need $x neq 1.$
â md2perpe
Aug 26 at 20:59
We don't need $x > 1$ to cancel $x-1.$ We only need $x neq 1.$
â md2perpe
Aug 26 at 20:59
1
1
The proof looks okay to me. I would make some changes in the exposition, but in essence it's correct.
â Ãµ-ô
Aug 26 at 21:01
The proof looks okay to me. I would make some changes in the exposition, but in essence it's correct.
â Ãµ-ô
Aug 26 at 21:01
 |Â
show 3 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Your proof is very good. You have explained every step very clearly.
Note that at $$left|frac(x-2)3(x+1)right|<|x-2|<epsilon$$
You could have done a little bit better by considering $3(x+1)>7.5$
Thus we could have said $$left|frac(x-2)3(x+1)right|<|x-2|/7.5<epsilon$$ Which makes your $delta = min(0.5,7.5epsilon)$
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Your proof is very good. You have explained every step very clearly.
Note that at $$left|frac(x-2)3(x+1)right|<|x-2|<epsilon$$
You could have done a little bit better by considering $3(x+1)>7.5$
Thus we could have said $$left|frac(x-2)3(x+1)right|<|x-2|/7.5<epsilon$$ Which makes your $delta = min(0.5,7.5epsilon)$
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Your proof is very good. You have explained every step very clearly.
Note that at $$left|frac(x-2)3(x+1)right|<|x-2|<epsilon$$
You could have done a little bit better by considering $3(x+1)>7.5$
Thus we could have said $$left|frac(x-2)3(x+1)right|<|x-2|/7.5<epsilon$$ Which makes your $delta = min(0.5,7.5epsilon)$
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Your proof is very good. You have explained every step very clearly.
Note that at $$left|frac(x-2)3(x+1)right|<|x-2|<epsilon$$
You could have done a little bit better by considering $3(x+1)>7.5$
Thus we could have said $$left|frac(x-2)3(x+1)right|<|x-2|/7.5<epsilon$$ Which makes your $delta = min(0.5,7.5epsilon)$
Your proof is very good. You have explained every step very clearly.
Note that at $$left|frac(x-2)3(x+1)right|<|x-2|<epsilon$$
You could have done a little bit better by considering $3(x+1)>7.5$
Thus we could have said $$left|frac(x-2)3(x+1)right|<|x-2|/7.5<epsilon$$ Which makes your $delta = min(0.5,7.5epsilon)$
answered Aug 26 at 21:10
Mohammad Riazi-Kermani
30.5k41852
30.5k41852
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2895497%2fepsilon-delta-limit-proof-verification-of-lim-x-to2-fracx-1x2-1-fr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
1
Showing the preliminary work and just a start of the proof doesn't count as showing the proof.
â md2perpe
Aug 26 at 20:50
@md2perpe i just want to verify whether the preliminary work is correct first :)
â Erik Hambardzumyan
Aug 26 at 20:51
@md2perpe i've edited the quesiton just now
â Erik Hambardzumyan
Aug 26 at 20:52
We don't need $x > 1$ to cancel $x-1.$ We only need $x neq 1.$
â md2perpe
Aug 26 at 20:59
1
The proof looks okay to me. I would make some changes in the exposition, but in essence it's correct.
â Ãµ-ô
Aug 26 at 21:01