epsilon delta limit proof verification of $lim_xto2fracx-1x^2-1 = frac13 $.

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I just want to verify the preliminary work of my epsilon delta proof for this one.




$$lim_xrightarrow 2fracx-1x^2-1 = frac13 $$




$underlinetextprelimnary work$



$forall epsilon>0, exists delta>0$ $s.t.$
$|x-2|<deltaRightarrow left|fracx-1x^2-1-frac13right|<epsilon$



we know
$$left|fracx-1x^2-1-frac13right| =
left|frac(x-1)(x-2)3(x-1)(x+1)right|$$



now we take $x>1$ to cancel $x-1$;
we pick $delta<a$ such that $2-a>1$ i.e. $0<a<1$; therefore $delta< 0.5$ will do. Thus, $delta<0.5$ therefore $|x-2|<delta<0.5$
$$1.5<x<2.5$$



now we have
$$left|frac(x-1)(x-2)3(x-1)(x+1)right| = left|frac(x-2)3(x+1)right|<|x-2|<epsilon $$
hence $delta = min(0.5, epsilon)$



$underlinetextproof$



take $delta = 0.5$ or $delta = epsilon ...$



is there anything wrong with my proof? Crtisim is highly appreciated







share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    Showing the preliminary work and just a start of the proof doesn't count as showing the proof.
    – md2perpe
    Aug 26 at 20:50










  • @md2perpe i just want to verify whether the preliminary work is correct first :)
    – Erik Hambardzumyan
    Aug 26 at 20:51










  • @md2perpe i've edited the quesiton just now
    – Erik Hambardzumyan
    Aug 26 at 20:52










  • We don't need $x > 1$ to cancel $x-1.$ We only need $x neq 1.$
    – md2perpe
    Aug 26 at 20:59






  • 1




    The proof looks okay to me. I would make some changes in the exposition, but in essence it's correct.
    – Îµ-δ
    Aug 26 at 21:01















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I just want to verify the preliminary work of my epsilon delta proof for this one.




$$lim_xrightarrow 2fracx-1x^2-1 = frac13 $$




$underlinetextprelimnary work$



$forall epsilon>0, exists delta>0$ $s.t.$
$|x-2|<deltaRightarrow left|fracx-1x^2-1-frac13right|<epsilon$



we know
$$left|fracx-1x^2-1-frac13right| =
left|frac(x-1)(x-2)3(x-1)(x+1)right|$$



now we take $x>1$ to cancel $x-1$;
we pick $delta<a$ such that $2-a>1$ i.e. $0<a<1$; therefore $delta< 0.5$ will do. Thus, $delta<0.5$ therefore $|x-2|<delta<0.5$
$$1.5<x<2.5$$



now we have
$$left|frac(x-1)(x-2)3(x-1)(x+1)right| = left|frac(x-2)3(x+1)right|<|x-2|<epsilon $$
hence $delta = min(0.5, epsilon)$



$underlinetextproof$



take $delta = 0.5$ or $delta = epsilon ...$



is there anything wrong with my proof? Crtisim is highly appreciated







share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    Showing the preliminary work and just a start of the proof doesn't count as showing the proof.
    – md2perpe
    Aug 26 at 20:50










  • @md2perpe i just want to verify whether the preliminary work is correct first :)
    – Erik Hambardzumyan
    Aug 26 at 20:51










  • @md2perpe i've edited the quesiton just now
    – Erik Hambardzumyan
    Aug 26 at 20:52










  • We don't need $x > 1$ to cancel $x-1.$ We only need $x neq 1.$
    – md2perpe
    Aug 26 at 20:59






  • 1




    The proof looks okay to me. I would make some changes in the exposition, but in essence it's correct.
    – Îµ-δ
    Aug 26 at 21:01













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I just want to verify the preliminary work of my epsilon delta proof for this one.




$$lim_xrightarrow 2fracx-1x^2-1 = frac13 $$




$underlinetextprelimnary work$



$forall epsilon>0, exists delta>0$ $s.t.$
$|x-2|<deltaRightarrow left|fracx-1x^2-1-frac13right|<epsilon$



we know
$$left|fracx-1x^2-1-frac13right| =
left|frac(x-1)(x-2)3(x-1)(x+1)right|$$



now we take $x>1$ to cancel $x-1$;
we pick $delta<a$ such that $2-a>1$ i.e. $0<a<1$; therefore $delta< 0.5$ will do. Thus, $delta<0.5$ therefore $|x-2|<delta<0.5$
$$1.5<x<2.5$$



now we have
$$left|frac(x-1)(x-2)3(x-1)(x+1)right| = left|frac(x-2)3(x+1)right|<|x-2|<epsilon $$
hence $delta = min(0.5, epsilon)$



$underlinetextproof$



take $delta = 0.5$ or $delta = epsilon ...$



is there anything wrong with my proof? Crtisim is highly appreciated







share|cite|improve this question














I just want to verify the preliminary work of my epsilon delta proof for this one.




$$lim_xrightarrow 2fracx-1x^2-1 = frac13 $$




$underlinetextprelimnary work$



$forall epsilon>0, exists delta>0$ $s.t.$
$|x-2|<deltaRightarrow left|fracx-1x^2-1-frac13right|<epsilon$



we know
$$left|fracx-1x^2-1-frac13right| =
left|frac(x-1)(x-2)3(x-1)(x+1)right|$$



now we take $x>1$ to cancel $x-1$;
we pick $delta<a$ such that $2-a>1$ i.e. $0<a<1$; therefore $delta< 0.5$ will do. Thus, $delta<0.5$ therefore $|x-2|<delta<0.5$
$$1.5<x<2.5$$



now we have
$$left|frac(x-1)(x-2)3(x-1)(x+1)right| = left|frac(x-2)3(x+1)right|<|x-2|<epsilon $$
hence $delta = min(0.5, epsilon)$



$underlinetextproof$



take $delta = 0.5$ or $delta = epsilon ...$



is there anything wrong with my proof? Crtisim is highly appreciated









share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 27 at 11:50

























asked Aug 26 at 20:44









Erik Hambardzumyan

1568




1568







  • 1




    Showing the preliminary work and just a start of the proof doesn't count as showing the proof.
    – md2perpe
    Aug 26 at 20:50










  • @md2perpe i just want to verify whether the preliminary work is correct first :)
    – Erik Hambardzumyan
    Aug 26 at 20:51










  • @md2perpe i've edited the quesiton just now
    – Erik Hambardzumyan
    Aug 26 at 20:52










  • We don't need $x > 1$ to cancel $x-1.$ We only need $x neq 1.$
    – md2perpe
    Aug 26 at 20:59






  • 1




    The proof looks okay to me. I would make some changes in the exposition, but in essence it's correct.
    – Îµ-δ
    Aug 26 at 21:01













  • 1




    Showing the preliminary work and just a start of the proof doesn't count as showing the proof.
    – md2perpe
    Aug 26 at 20:50










  • @md2perpe i just want to verify whether the preliminary work is correct first :)
    – Erik Hambardzumyan
    Aug 26 at 20:51










  • @md2perpe i've edited the quesiton just now
    – Erik Hambardzumyan
    Aug 26 at 20:52










  • We don't need $x > 1$ to cancel $x-1.$ We only need $x neq 1.$
    – md2perpe
    Aug 26 at 20:59






  • 1




    The proof looks okay to me. I would make some changes in the exposition, but in essence it's correct.
    – Îµ-δ
    Aug 26 at 21:01








1




1




Showing the preliminary work and just a start of the proof doesn't count as showing the proof.
– md2perpe
Aug 26 at 20:50




Showing the preliminary work and just a start of the proof doesn't count as showing the proof.
– md2perpe
Aug 26 at 20:50












@md2perpe i just want to verify whether the preliminary work is correct first :)
– Erik Hambardzumyan
Aug 26 at 20:51




@md2perpe i just want to verify whether the preliminary work is correct first :)
– Erik Hambardzumyan
Aug 26 at 20:51












@md2perpe i've edited the quesiton just now
– Erik Hambardzumyan
Aug 26 at 20:52




@md2perpe i've edited the quesiton just now
– Erik Hambardzumyan
Aug 26 at 20:52












We don't need $x > 1$ to cancel $x-1.$ We only need $x neq 1.$
– md2perpe
Aug 26 at 20:59




We don't need $x > 1$ to cancel $x-1.$ We only need $x neq 1.$
– md2perpe
Aug 26 at 20:59




1




1




The proof looks okay to me. I would make some changes in the exposition, but in essence it's correct.
– Îµ-δ
Aug 26 at 21:01





The proof looks okay to me. I would make some changes in the exposition, but in essence it's correct.
– Îµ-δ
Aug 26 at 21:01











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










Your proof is very good. You have explained every step very clearly.



Note that at $$left|frac(x-2)3(x+1)right|<|x-2|<epsilon$$



You could have done a little bit better by considering $3(x+1)>7.5$



Thus we could have said $$left|frac(x-2)3(x+1)right|<|x-2|/7.5<epsilon$$ Which makes your $delta = min(0.5,7.5epsilon)$






share|cite|improve this answer




















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2895497%2fepsilon-delta-limit-proof-verification-of-lim-x-to2-fracx-1x2-1-fr%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    2
    down vote



    accepted










    Your proof is very good. You have explained every step very clearly.



    Note that at $$left|frac(x-2)3(x+1)right|<|x-2|<epsilon$$



    You could have done a little bit better by considering $3(x+1)>7.5$



    Thus we could have said $$left|frac(x-2)3(x+1)right|<|x-2|/7.5<epsilon$$ Which makes your $delta = min(0.5,7.5epsilon)$






    share|cite|improve this answer
























      up vote
      2
      down vote



      accepted










      Your proof is very good. You have explained every step very clearly.



      Note that at $$left|frac(x-2)3(x+1)right|<|x-2|<epsilon$$



      You could have done a little bit better by considering $3(x+1)>7.5$



      Thus we could have said $$left|frac(x-2)3(x+1)right|<|x-2|/7.5<epsilon$$ Which makes your $delta = min(0.5,7.5epsilon)$






      share|cite|improve this answer






















        up vote
        2
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        2
        down vote



        accepted






        Your proof is very good. You have explained every step very clearly.



        Note that at $$left|frac(x-2)3(x+1)right|<|x-2|<epsilon$$



        You could have done a little bit better by considering $3(x+1)>7.5$



        Thus we could have said $$left|frac(x-2)3(x+1)right|<|x-2|/7.5<epsilon$$ Which makes your $delta = min(0.5,7.5epsilon)$






        share|cite|improve this answer












        Your proof is very good. You have explained every step very clearly.



        Note that at $$left|frac(x-2)3(x+1)right|<|x-2|<epsilon$$



        You could have done a little bit better by considering $3(x+1)>7.5$



        Thus we could have said $$left|frac(x-2)3(x+1)right|<|x-2|/7.5<epsilon$$ Which makes your $delta = min(0.5,7.5epsilon)$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Aug 26 at 21:10









        Mohammad Riazi-Kermani

        30.5k41852




        30.5k41852



























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2895497%2fepsilon-delta-limit-proof-verification-of-lim-x-to2-fracx-1x2-1-fr%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            這個網誌中的熱門文章

            Is there any way to eliminate the singular point to solve this integral by hand or by approximations?

            Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

            Amount of Number Combinations to Reach a Sum of 10 With Integers 1-9 Using 2 or More Integers [closed]