What comes after $cosleft(tfrac2pi7right)^1/3+cosleft(tfrac4pi7right)^1/3+cosleft(tfrac6pi7right)^1/3$?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
22
down vote
favorite
We have,
$$big(cos(tfrac2pi5)^1/2+(-cos(tfrac4pi5))^1/2big)^2 = tfrac12left(tfrac-1+sqrt52right)^3tag1$$
$$big(cos(tfrac2pi7)^1/3+cos(tfrac4pi7)^1/3+cos(tfrac6pi7)^1/3big)^3 = frac5-3cdot 7^1/32tag2$$
$$big(cos(tfrac2pi11)^1/5+cos(tfrac4pi11)^1/5+dots+cos(tfrac10pi11)^1/5big)^5 = x?tag3$$
Question: What degree is the minimal polynomial of $x$? Since the previous two are deg 2 and 3, I had assumed (3) would be deg 5, but Mathematica does not recognize it as a quintic with small coefficients, nor a 25th deg (even after using 500-decimal digit precision, though I am not sure of the latter result).
trigonometry radicals cyclotomic-polynomials minimal-polynomials
 |Â
show 6 more comments
up vote
22
down vote
favorite
We have,
$$big(cos(tfrac2pi5)^1/2+(-cos(tfrac4pi5))^1/2big)^2 = tfrac12left(tfrac-1+sqrt52right)^3tag1$$
$$big(cos(tfrac2pi7)^1/3+cos(tfrac4pi7)^1/3+cos(tfrac6pi7)^1/3big)^3 = frac5-3cdot 7^1/32tag2$$
$$big(cos(tfrac2pi11)^1/5+cos(tfrac4pi11)^1/5+dots+cos(tfrac10pi11)^1/5big)^5 = x?tag3$$
Question: What degree is the minimal polynomial of $x$? Since the previous two are deg 2 and 3, I had assumed (3) would be deg 5, but Mathematica does not recognize it as a quintic with small coefficients, nor a 25th deg (even after using 500-decimal digit precision, though I am not sure of the latter result).
trigonometry radicals cyclotomic-polynomials minimal-polynomials
How have you derived the identities? For cubic, we can set $y=(frac z2)^frac13$ here in my answer math.stackexchange.com/questions/225088/⦠and then use Vieta's formula
â lab bhattacharjee
Dec 19 '13 at 5:53
The first is easy, while the second is at the end of mathworld.wolfram.com/TrigonometryAnglesPi7.html. The third is unknown.
â Tito Piezas III
Dec 19 '13 at 16:19
Are you sure about the first "identity"? In particular, $cos frac4pi5$ is negative, so taking square root of it results in purely imaginary number; so the sum of two terms is neither real, nor purely imaginary... and thus its square cannot be real.
â Peter Koà ¡inár
Dec 19 '13 at 22:40
1
@GrigoryM: What Ramanujan formula? Regarding (3), since $y^5=a_i$ has five roots, and we are to do so for five $a_i=cos(n)$, then I think it has maximum degree $5^5 = 3125$ though it may factor since the $a_i$ are not random. I tested the form $z=(y_1+y_2zeta^k+y_3zeta^2k+y_4zeta^3k+y_5zeta^4k)^5$ where the $y_i = cos(n)^1/5$ and $zeta^5=1$ and tried to form a 125-deg resolvent, but it still doesn't seem to be the minimal deg.
â Tito Piezas III
Dec 20 '13 at 20:03
1
I'm not sure there exists a (good) generalization in this direction â but maybe you'll find another generalization of the second formula of interest
â Grigory M
Jan 20 '14 at 8:33
 |Â
show 6 more comments
up vote
22
down vote
favorite
up vote
22
down vote
favorite
We have,
$$big(cos(tfrac2pi5)^1/2+(-cos(tfrac4pi5))^1/2big)^2 = tfrac12left(tfrac-1+sqrt52right)^3tag1$$
$$big(cos(tfrac2pi7)^1/3+cos(tfrac4pi7)^1/3+cos(tfrac6pi7)^1/3big)^3 = frac5-3cdot 7^1/32tag2$$
$$big(cos(tfrac2pi11)^1/5+cos(tfrac4pi11)^1/5+dots+cos(tfrac10pi11)^1/5big)^5 = x?tag3$$
Question: What degree is the minimal polynomial of $x$? Since the previous two are deg 2 and 3, I had assumed (3) would be deg 5, but Mathematica does not recognize it as a quintic with small coefficients, nor a 25th deg (even after using 500-decimal digit precision, though I am not sure of the latter result).
trigonometry radicals cyclotomic-polynomials minimal-polynomials
We have,
$$big(cos(tfrac2pi5)^1/2+(-cos(tfrac4pi5))^1/2big)^2 = tfrac12left(tfrac-1+sqrt52right)^3tag1$$
$$big(cos(tfrac2pi7)^1/3+cos(tfrac4pi7)^1/3+cos(tfrac6pi7)^1/3big)^3 = frac5-3cdot 7^1/32tag2$$
$$big(cos(tfrac2pi11)^1/5+cos(tfrac4pi11)^1/5+dots+cos(tfrac10pi11)^1/5big)^5 = x?tag3$$
Question: What degree is the minimal polynomial of $x$? Since the previous two are deg 2 and 3, I had assumed (3) would be deg 5, but Mathematica does not recognize it as a quintic with small coefficients, nor a 25th deg (even after using 500-decimal digit precision, though I am not sure of the latter result).
trigonometry radicals cyclotomic-polynomials minimal-polynomials
edited Apr 30 at 8:37
mathreadler
13.7k71957
13.7k71957
asked Dec 19 '13 at 5:26
Tito Piezas III
26.2k361161
26.2k361161
How have you derived the identities? For cubic, we can set $y=(frac z2)^frac13$ here in my answer math.stackexchange.com/questions/225088/⦠and then use Vieta's formula
â lab bhattacharjee
Dec 19 '13 at 5:53
The first is easy, while the second is at the end of mathworld.wolfram.com/TrigonometryAnglesPi7.html. The third is unknown.
â Tito Piezas III
Dec 19 '13 at 16:19
Are you sure about the first "identity"? In particular, $cos frac4pi5$ is negative, so taking square root of it results in purely imaginary number; so the sum of two terms is neither real, nor purely imaginary... and thus its square cannot be real.
â Peter Koà ¡inár
Dec 19 '13 at 22:40
1
@GrigoryM: What Ramanujan formula? Regarding (3), since $y^5=a_i$ has five roots, and we are to do so for five $a_i=cos(n)$, then I think it has maximum degree $5^5 = 3125$ though it may factor since the $a_i$ are not random. I tested the form $z=(y_1+y_2zeta^k+y_3zeta^2k+y_4zeta^3k+y_5zeta^4k)^5$ where the $y_i = cos(n)^1/5$ and $zeta^5=1$ and tried to form a 125-deg resolvent, but it still doesn't seem to be the minimal deg.
â Tito Piezas III
Dec 20 '13 at 20:03
1
I'm not sure there exists a (good) generalization in this direction â but maybe you'll find another generalization of the second formula of interest
â Grigory M
Jan 20 '14 at 8:33
 |Â
show 6 more comments
How have you derived the identities? For cubic, we can set $y=(frac z2)^frac13$ here in my answer math.stackexchange.com/questions/225088/⦠and then use Vieta's formula
â lab bhattacharjee
Dec 19 '13 at 5:53
The first is easy, while the second is at the end of mathworld.wolfram.com/TrigonometryAnglesPi7.html. The third is unknown.
â Tito Piezas III
Dec 19 '13 at 16:19
Are you sure about the first "identity"? In particular, $cos frac4pi5$ is negative, so taking square root of it results in purely imaginary number; so the sum of two terms is neither real, nor purely imaginary... and thus its square cannot be real.
â Peter Koà ¡inár
Dec 19 '13 at 22:40
1
@GrigoryM: What Ramanujan formula? Regarding (3), since $y^5=a_i$ has five roots, and we are to do so for five $a_i=cos(n)$, then I think it has maximum degree $5^5 = 3125$ though it may factor since the $a_i$ are not random. I tested the form $z=(y_1+y_2zeta^k+y_3zeta^2k+y_4zeta^3k+y_5zeta^4k)^5$ where the $y_i = cos(n)^1/5$ and $zeta^5=1$ and tried to form a 125-deg resolvent, but it still doesn't seem to be the minimal deg.
â Tito Piezas III
Dec 20 '13 at 20:03
1
I'm not sure there exists a (good) generalization in this direction â but maybe you'll find another generalization of the second formula of interest
â Grigory M
Jan 20 '14 at 8:33
How have you derived the identities? For cubic, we can set $y=(frac z2)^frac13$ here in my answer math.stackexchange.com/questions/225088/⦠and then use Vieta's formula
â lab bhattacharjee
Dec 19 '13 at 5:53
How have you derived the identities? For cubic, we can set $y=(frac z2)^frac13$ here in my answer math.stackexchange.com/questions/225088/⦠and then use Vieta's formula
â lab bhattacharjee
Dec 19 '13 at 5:53
The first is easy, while the second is at the end of mathworld.wolfram.com/TrigonometryAnglesPi7.html. The third is unknown.
â Tito Piezas III
Dec 19 '13 at 16:19
The first is easy, while the second is at the end of mathworld.wolfram.com/TrigonometryAnglesPi7.html. The third is unknown.
â Tito Piezas III
Dec 19 '13 at 16:19
Are you sure about the first "identity"? In particular, $cos frac4pi5$ is negative, so taking square root of it results in purely imaginary number; so the sum of two terms is neither real, nor purely imaginary... and thus its square cannot be real.
â Peter Koà ¡inár
Dec 19 '13 at 22:40
Are you sure about the first "identity"? In particular, $cos frac4pi5$ is negative, so taking square root of it results in purely imaginary number; so the sum of two terms is neither real, nor purely imaginary... and thus its square cannot be real.
â Peter Koà ¡inár
Dec 19 '13 at 22:40
1
1
@GrigoryM: What Ramanujan formula? Regarding (3), since $y^5=a_i$ has five roots, and we are to do so for five $a_i=cos(n)$, then I think it has maximum degree $5^5 = 3125$ though it may factor since the $a_i$ are not random. I tested the form $z=(y_1+y_2zeta^k+y_3zeta^2k+y_4zeta^3k+y_5zeta^4k)^5$ where the $y_i = cos(n)^1/5$ and $zeta^5=1$ and tried to form a 125-deg resolvent, but it still doesn't seem to be the minimal deg.
â Tito Piezas III
Dec 20 '13 at 20:03
@GrigoryM: What Ramanujan formula? Regarding (3), since $y^5=a_i$ has five roots, and we are to do so for five $a_i=cos(n)$, then I think it has maximum degree $5^5 = 3125$ though it may factor since the $a_i$ are not random. I tested the form $z=(y_1+y_2zeta^k+y_3zeta^2k+y_4zeta^3k+y_5zeta^4k)^5$ where the $y_i = cos(n)^1/5$ and $zeta^5=1$ and tried to form a 125-deg resolvent, but it still doesn't seem to be the minimal deg.
â Tito Piezas III
Dec 20 '13 at 20:03
1
1
I'm not sure there exists a (good) generalization in this direction â but maybe you'll find another generalization of the second formula of interest
â Grigory M
Jan 20 '14 at 8:33
I'm not sure there exists a (good) generalization in this direction â but maybe you'll find another generalization of the second formula of interest
â Grigory M
Jan 20 '14 at 8:33
 |Â
show 6 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
As some people said, the 2nd formula is easy to derive. In Maple, there are commands to get the minimal polynomial of LHS of the 2nd. The following method works for the 2nd formula, but not for the 3rd.
Prove that $sqrt[3]cosfrac2pi7 + sqrt[3]cosfrac4pi7 + sqrt[3]cosfrac6pi7 = sqrt[3]frac5-3sqrt[3]72$.
$textitProof$: $cosfrac2pi7,cosfrac4pi7,cosfrac6pi7$ are the three distinct real roots of $8x^3+4x^2-4x-1=0$.
Let $u_1=sqrt[3]cosfrac2pi7, u_2=sqrt[3]cosfrac4pi7, u_3=sqrt[3]cosfrac6pi7$ which are all real.
All roots of $8u^9+4u^6-4u^3-1=0$ are $u_1, t u_1, t^2 u_1, u_2, t u_2, t^2 u_2, u_3, t u_3, t^2 u_3$
where $t = e^2pi i/3$.
Let $(u-u_1)(u-u_2)(u-u_3)=u^3+a_2u^2+a_1u - 1/2$. We have
beginalign
(u-tu_1)(u-tu_2)(u-tu_3) &=u^3+ta_2u^2+t^2a_1u - 1/2, \
(u-t^2u_1)(u-t^2u_2)(u-t^2u_3) &=u^3+t^2a_2u^2+ta_1u - 1/2.
endalign
It follows from
beginalign
&8u^9+4u^6-4u^3-1 \
= & 8(u^3+a_2u^2+a_1u - 1/2)(u^3+ta_2u^2+t^2a_1u - 1/2)(u^3+t^2a_2u^2+ta_1u - 1/2)
endalign that
beginalign
a_2^3-3a_1a_2-2 &=0, \
4a_1^3+6a_1a_2+5 &= 0.
endalign
From these two equations, we get $a_1 = fraca_2^3-23a_2$
and $4a_2^9+30a_2^6+75a_2^3-32=0$.
Let $f(v)=4v^9+30v^6+75v^3-32$. We have $f'(v)=9v^2(2v^3+5)^2ge 0$. Thus, $f(v)=0$ has a unique real root.
It is easy to check that $v=-sqrt[3]frac5-3sqrt[3]72$ is a root of
$f(v)=0$. Thus, $a_2 = -sqrt[3]frac5-3sqrt[3]72$.
Thus, $u_1+u_2+u_3 = -a_2 = sqrt[3]frac5-3sqrt[3]72$. This completes the proof.
In general, suppose $x_1,x_2,x_3$ are the three distinct real roots of $x^3+bx^2+cx+d^3=0$,
where $b,c,d$ are rational numbers. We have
beginequation
sqrt[3]x_1+sqrt[3]x_2+sqrt[3]x_3 = sqrt[3]
-frac32Big(sqrt[3]Q+4sqrtDelta+sqrt[3]Q-4sqrtDeltaBig) -b-6d ,
endequation
where $Q = 24bd^2+36d^3+4bc+24cd, Delta = -4b^3d^3-27d^6+18bcd^3+b^2c^2-4c^3$.
Here, $Delta$ is the discriminant of $x^3+bx^2+cx+d^3=0$.
For the 3rd, similarly,
$x_k = cosfrac2kpi11, k=1,cdots, 5$ are the five distinct real roots of $32x^5+16x^4-32x^3-12x^2+6x+1=0$.
Let $u_1 = sqrt[5]cosfrac2pi11, u_2= sqrt[5]cosfrac4pi11, u_3 = sqrt[5]cosfrac6pi11, u_4 = sqrt[5]cosfrac8pi11, u_5= sqrt[5]cosfrac10pi11$.
All roots of $32u^25+16u^20-32u^15-12u^10+6u^5+1=0$ are
$t^j u_k, k=1,2,3,4, 5; j=0,1,2,3,4$ where $t= e^2pi i/5$.
Let $prod_k=1^5 (u-u_k) = u^5 + a_4u^4+a_3u^3+a_2u^2+a_1u+frac12$.
Similarly, we have four equations of
beginalign
0 & = a_4^5-5a_3a_4^3+5a_2a_4^2+5a_3^2a_4-5a_1a_4-5a_2a_3+2, \
0 & = 8a_1^5-20a_1^3a_2+10a_1^2a_3+10a_1a_2^2-5a_1a_4-5a_2a_3+1,\
0 & = -10a_1a_2a_4^3+10a_1a_3^2a_4^2+10a_2^2a_3a_4^2-10a_2a_3^3a_4+2a_3^5+10a_1^2a_4^2-10a_1a_2a_3a_4\
&quad-10a_1a_3^3-10a_2^3a_4+10a_2^2a_3^2-5a_3a_4^3+10a_1^2a_3+10a_1a_2^2+10a_2a_4^2+10a_3^2a_4\
&quad -15a_1a_4-15a_2a_3+7,\
0 & = -40a_1^3a_3a_4+40a_1^2a_2^2a_4+40a_1^2a_2a_3^2-40a_1a_2^3a_3+8a_2^5-40a_1^3a_2+20a_1^2a_4^2\
&quad-20a_1a_2a_3a_4-20a_1a_3^3-20a_2^3a_4+20a_2^2a_3^2+40a_1^2a_3+40a_1a_2^2+10a_2a_4^2\
&quad +10a_3^2a_4-30a_1a_4-30a_2a_3+13.
endalign
However, it seems no hope for determination of $a_4$.
2
I don't mean to be rude, by I find this utter unreadable. Could you perhaps make use of some displayed math environments (using$$ (math here) $$
) or the align environment (beginalign endalign
) to make it easier to follow? You can also find other formatting tips in the MathJax tutorial.
â Xander Henderson
Aug 17 at 3:19
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
As some people said, the 2nd formula is easy to derive. In Maple, there are commands to get the minimal polynomial of LHS of the 2nd. The following method works for the 2nd formula, but not for the 3rd.
Prove that $sqrt[3]cosfrac2pi7 + sqrt[3]cosfrac4pi7 + sqrt[3]cosfrac6pi7 = sqrt[3]frac5-3sqrt[3]72$.
$textitProof$: $cosfrac2pi7,cosfrac4pi7,cosfrac6pi7$ are the three distinct real roots of $8x^3+4x^2-4x-1=0$.
Let $u_1=sqrt[3]cosfrac2pi7, u_2=sqrt[3]cosfrac4pi7, u_3=sqrt[3]cosfrac6pi7$ which are all real.
All roots of $8u^9+4u^6-4u^3-1=0$ are $u_1, t u_1, t^2 u_1, u_2, t u_2, t^2 u_2, u_3, t u_3, t^2 u_3$
where $t = e^2pi i/3$.
Let $(u-u_1)(u-u_2)(u-u_3)=u^3+a_2u^2+a_1u - 1/2$. We have
beginalign
(u-tu_1)(u-tu_2)(u-tu_3) &=u^3+ta_2u^2+t^2a_1u - 1/2, \
(u-t^2u_1)(u-t^2u_2)(u-t^2u_3) &=u^3+t^2a_2u^2+ta_1u - 1/2.
endalign
It follows from
beginalign
&8u^9+4u^6-4u^3-1 \
= & 8(u^3+a_2u^2+a_1u - 1/2)(u^3+ta_2u^2+t^2a_1u - 1/2)(u^3+t^2a_2u^2+ta_1u - 1/2)
endalign that
beginalign
a_2^3-3a_1a_2-2 &=0, \
4a_1^3+6a_1a_2+5 &= 0.
endalign
From these two equations, we get $a_1 = fraca_2^3-23a_2$
and $4a_2^9+30a_2^6+75a_2^3-32=0$.
Let $f(v)=4v^9+30v^6+75v^3-32$. We have $f'(v)=9v^2(2v^3+5)^2ge 0$. Thus, $f(v)=0$ has a unique real root.
It is easy to check that $v=-sqrt[3]frac5-3sqrt[3]72$ is a root of
$f(v)=0$. Thus, $a_2 = -sqrt[3]frac5-3sqrt[3]72$.
Thus, $u_1+u_2+u_3 = -a_2 = sqrt[3]frac5-3sqrt[3]72$. This completes the proof.
In general, suppose $x_1,x_2,x_3$ are the three distinct real roots of $x^3+bx^2+cx+d^3=0$,
where $b,c,d$ are rational numbers. We have
beginequation
sqrt[3]x_1+sqrt[3]x_2+sqrt[3]x_3 = sqrt[3]
-frac32Big(sqrt[3]Q+4sqrtDelta+sqrt[3]Q-4sqrtDeltaBig) -b-6d ,
endequation
where $Q = 24bd^2+36d^3+4bc+24cd, Delta = -4b^3d^3-27d^6+18bcd^3+b^2c^2-4c^3$.
Here, $Delta$ is the discriminant of $x^3+bx^2+cx+d^3=0$.
For the 3rd, similarly,
$x_k = cosfrac2kpi11, k=1,cdots, 5$ are the five distinct real roots of $32x^5+16x^4-32x^3-12x^2+6x+1=0$.
Let $u_1 = sqrt[5]cosfrac2pi11, u_2= sqrt[5]cosfrac4pi11, u_3 = sqrt[5]cosfrac6pi11, u_4 = sqrt[5]cosfrac8pi11, u_5= sqrt[5]cosfrac10pi11$.
All roots of $32u^25+16u^20-32u^15-12u^10+6u^5+1=0$ are
$t^j u_k, k=1,2,3,4, 5; j=0,1,2,3,4$ where $t= e^2pi i/5$.
Let $prod_k=1^5 (u-u_k) = u^5 + a_4u^4+a_3u^3+a_2u^2+a_1u+frac12$.
Similarly, we have four equations of
beginalign
0 & = a_4^5-5a_3a_4^3+5a_2a_4^2+5a_3^2a_4-5a_1a_4-5a_2a_3+2, \
0 & = 8a_1^5-20a_1^3a_2+10a_1^2a_3+10a_1a_2^2-5a_1a_4-5a_2a_3+1,\
0 & = -10a_1a_2a_4^3+10a_1a_3^2a_4^2+10a_2^2a_3a_4^2-10a_2a_3^3a_4+2a_3^5+10a_1^2a_4^2-10a_1a_2a_3a_4\
&quad-10a_1a_3^3-10a_2^3a_4+10a_2^2a_3^2-5a_3a_4^3+10a_1^2a_3+10a_1a_2^2+10a_2a_4^2+10a_3^2a_4\
&quad -15a_1a_4-15a_2a_3+7,\
0 & = -40a_1^3a_3a_4+40a_1^2a_2^2a_4+40a_1^2a_2a_3^2-40a_1a_2^3a_3+8a_2^5-40a_1^3a_2+20a_1^2a_4^2\
&quad-20a_1a_2a_3a_4-20a_1a_3^3-20a_2^3a_4+20a_2^2a_3^2+40a_1^2a_3+40a_1a_2^2+10a_2a_4^2\
&quad +10a_3^2a_4-30a_1a_4-30a_2a_3+13.
endalign
However, it seems no hope for determination of $a_4$.
2
I don't mean to be rude, by I find this utter unreadable. Could you perhaps make use of some displayed math environments (using$$ (math here) $$
) or the align environment (beginalign endalign
) to make it easier to follow? You can also find other formatting tips in the MathJax tutorial.
â Xander Henderson
Aug 17 at 3:19
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
As some people said, the 2nd formula is easy to derive. In Maple, there are commands to get the minimal polynomial of LHS of the 2nd. The following method works for the 2nd formula, but not for the 3rd.
Prove that $sqrt[3]cosfrac2pi7 + sqrt[3]cosfrac4pi7 + sqrt[3]cosfrac6pi7 = sqrt[3]frac5-3sqrt[3]72$.
$textitProof$: $cosfrac2pi7,cosfrac4pi7,cosfrac6pi7$ are the three distinct real roots of $8x^3+4x^2-4x-1=0$.
Let $u_1=sqrt[3]cosfrac2pi7, u_2=sqrt[3]cosfrac4pi7, u_3=sqrt[3]cosfrac6pi7$ which are all real.
All roots of $8u^9+4u^6-4u^3-1=0$ are $u_1, t u_1, t^2 u_1, u_2, t u_2, t^2 u_2, u_3, t u_3, t^2 u_3$
where $t = e^2pi i/3$.
Let $(u-u_1)(u-u_2)(u-u_3)=u^3+a_2u^2+a_1u - 1/2$. We have
beginalign
(u-tu_1)(u-tu_2)(u-tu_3) &=u^3+ta_2u^2+t^2a_1u - 1/2, \
(u-t^2u_1)(u-t^2u_2)(u-t^2u_3) &=u^3+t^2a_2u^2+ta_1u - 1/2.
endalign
It follows from
beginalign
&8u^9+4u^6-4u^3-1 \
= & 8(u^3+a_2u^2+a_1u - 1/2)(u^3+ta_2u^2+t^2a_1u - 1/2)(u^3+t^2a_2u^2+ta_1u - 1/2)
endalign that
beginalign
a_2^3-3a_1a_2-2 &=0, \
4a_1^3+6a_1a_2+5 &= 0.
endalign
From these two equations, we get $a_1 = fraca_2^3-23a_2$
and $4a_2^9+30a_2^6+75a_2^3-32=0$.
Let $f(v)=4v^9+30v^6+75v^3-32$. We have $f'(v)=9v^2(2v^3+5)^2ge 0$. Thus, $f(v)=0$ has a unique real root.
It is easy to check that $v=-sqrt[3]frac5-3sqrt[3]72$ is a root of
$f(v)=0$. Thus, $a_2 = -sqrt[3]frac5-3sqrt[3]72$.
Thus, $u_1+u_2+u_3 = -a_2 = sqrt[3]frac5-3sqrt[3]72$. This completes the proof.
In general, suppose $x_1,x_2,x_3$ are the three distinct real roots of $x^3+bx^2+cx+d^3=0$,
where $b,c,d$ are rational numbers. We have
beginequation
sqrt[3]x_1+sqrt[3]x_2+sqrt[3]x_3 = sqrt[3]
-frac32Big(sqrt[3]Q+4sqrtDelta+sqrt[3]Q-4sqrtDeltaBig) -b-6d ,
endequation
where $Q = 24bd^2+36d^3+4bc+24cd, Delta = -4b^3d^3-27d^6+18bcd^3+b^2c^2-4c^3$.
Here, $Delta$ is the discriminant of $x^3+bx^2+cx+d^3=0$.
For the 3rd, similarly,
$x_k = cosfrac2kpi11, k=1,cdots, 5$ are the five distinct real roots of $32x^5+16x^4-32x^3-12x^2+6x+1=0$.
Let $u_1 = sqrt[5]cosfrac2pi11, u_2= sqrt[5]cosfrac4pi11, u_3 = sqrt[5]cosfrac6pi11, u_4 = sqrt[5]cosfrac8pi11, u_5= sqrt[5]cosfrac10pi11$.
All roots of $32u^25+16u^20-32u^15-12u^10+6u^5+1=0$ are
$t^j u_k, k=1,2,3,4, 5; j=0,1,2,3,4$ where $t= e^2pi i/5$.
Let $prod_k=1^5 (u-u_k) = u^5 + a_4u^4+a_3u^3+a_2u^2+a_1u+frac12$.
Similarly, we have four equations of
beginalign
0 & = a_4^5-5a_3a_4^3+5a_2a_4^2+5a_3^2a_4-5a_1a_4-5a_2a_3+2, \
0 & = 8a_1^5-20a_1^3a_2+10a_1^2a_3+10a_1a_2^2-5a_1a_4-5a_2a_3+1,\
0 & = -10a_1a_2a_4^3+10a_1a_3^2a_4^2+10a_2^2a_3a_4^2-10a_2a_3^3a_4+2a_3^5+10a_1^2a_4^2-10a_1a_2a_3a_4\
&quad-10a_1a_3^3-10a_2^3a_4+10a_2^2a_3^2-5a_3a_4^3+10a_1^2a_3+10a_1a_2^2+10a_2a_4^2+10a_3^2a_4\
&quad -15a_1a_4-15a_2a_3+7,\
0 & = -40a_1^3a_3a_4+40a_1^2a_2^2a_4+40a_1^2a_2a_3^2-40a_1a_2^3a_3+8a_2^5-40a_1^3a_2+20a_1^2a_4^2\
&quad-20a_1a_2a_3a_4-20a_1a_3^3-20a_2^3a_4+20a_2^2a_3^2+40a_1^2a_3+40a_1a_2^2+10a_2a_4^2\
&quad +10a_3^2a_4-30a_1a_4-30a_2a_3+13.
endalign
However, it seems no hope for determination of $a_4$.
2
I don't mean to be rude, by I find this utter unreadable. Could you perhaps make use of some displayed math environments (using$$ (math here) $$
) or the align environment (beginalign endalign
) to make it easier to follow? You can also find other formatting tips in the MathJax tutorial.
â Xander Henderson
Aug 17 at 3:19
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
As some people said, the 2nd formula is easy to derive. In Maple, there are commands to get the minimal polynomial of LHS of the 2nd. The following method works for the 2nd formula, but not for the 3rd.
Prove that $sqrt[3]cosfrac2pi7 + sqrt[3]cosfrac4pi7 + sqrt[3]cosfrac6pi7 = sqrt[3]frac5-3sqrt[3]72$.
$textitProof$: $cosfrac2pi7,cosfrac4pi7,cosfrac6pi7$ are the three distinct real roots of $8x^3+4x^2-4x-1=0$.
Let $u_1=sqrt[3]cosfrac2pi7, u_2=sqrt[3]cosfrac4pi7, u_3=sqrt[3]cosfrac6pi7$ which are all real.
All roots of $8u^9+4u^6-4u^3-1=0$ are $u_1, t u_1, t^2 u_1, u_2, t u_2, t^2 u_2, u_3, t u_3, t^2 u_3$
where $t = e^2pi i/3$.
Let $(u-u_1)(u-u_2)(u-u_3)=u^3+a_2u^2+a_1u - 1/2$. We have
beginalign
(u-tu_1)(u-tu_2)(u-tu_3) &=u^3+ta_2u^2+t^2a_1u - 1/2, \
(u-t^2u_1)(u-t^2u_2)(u-t^2u_3) &=u^3+t^2a_2u^2+ta_1u - 1/2.
endalign
It follows from
beginalign
&8u^9+4u^6-4u^3-1 \
= & 8(u^3+a_2u^2+a_1u - 1/2)(u^3+ta_2u^2+t^2a_1u - 1/2)(u^3+t^2a_2u^2+ta_1u - 1/2)
endalign that
beginalign
a_2^3-3a_1a_2-2 &=0, \
4a_1^3+6a_1a_2+5 &= 0.
endalign
From these two equations, we get $a_1 = fraca_2^3-23a_2$
and $4a_2^9+30a_2^6+75a_2^3-32=0$.
Let $f(v)=4v^9+30v^6+75v^3-32$. We have $f'(v)=9v^2(2v^3+5)^2ge 0$. Thus, $f(v)=0$ has a unique real root.
It is easy to check that $v=-sqrt[3]frac5-3sqrt[3]72$ is a root of
$f(v)=0$. Thus, $a_2 = -sqrt[3]frac5-3sqrt[3]72$.
Thus, $u_1+u_2+u_3 = -a_2 = sqrt[3]frac5-3sqrt[3]72$. This completes the proof.
In general, suppose $x_1,x_2,x_3$ are the three distinct real roots of $x^3+bx^2+cx+d^3=0$,
where $b,c,d$ are rational numbers. We have
beginequation
sqrt[3]x_1+sqrt[3]x_2+sqrt[3]x_3 = sqrt[3]
-frac32Big(sqrt[3]Q+4sqrtDelta+sqrt[3]Q-4sqrtDeltaBig) -b-6d ,
endequation
where $Q = 24bd^2+36d^3+4bc+24cd, Delta = -4b^3d^3-27d^6+18bcd^3+b^2c^2-4c^3$.
Here, $Delta$ is the discriminant of $x^3+bx^2+cx+d^3=0$.
For the 3rd, similarly,
$x_k = cosfrac2kpi11, k=1,cdots, 5$ are the five distinct real roots of $32x^5+16x^4-32x^3-12x^2+6x+1=0$.
Let $u_1 = sqrt[5]cosfrac2pi11, u_2= sqrt[5]cosfrac4pi11, u_3 = sqrt[5]cosfrac6pi11, u_4 = sqrt[5]cosfrac8pi11, u_5= sqrt[5]cosfrac10pi11$.
All roots of $32u^25+16u^20-32u^15-12u^10+6u^5+1=0$ are
$t^j u_k, k=1,2,3,4, 5; j=0,1,2,3,4$ where $t= e^2pi i/5$.
Let $prod_k=1^5 (u-u_k) = u^5 + a_4u^4+a_3u^3+a_2u^2+a_1u+frac12$.
Similarly, we have four equations of
beginalign
0 & = a_4^5-5a_3a_4^3+5a_2a_4^2+5a_3^2a_4-5a_1a_4-5a_2a_3+2, \
0 & = 8a_1^5-20a_1^3a_2+10a_1^2a_3+10a_1a_2^2-5a_1a_4-5a_2a_3+1,\
0 & = -10a_1a_2a_4^3+10a_1a_3^2a_4^2+10a_2^2a_3a_4^2-10a_2a_3^3a_4+2a_3^5+10a_1^2a_4^2-10a_1a_2a_3a_4\
&quad-10a_1a_3^3-10a_2^3a_4+10a_2^2a_3^2-5a_3a_4^3+10a_1^2a_3+10a_1a_2^2+10a_2a_4^2+10a_3^2a_4\
&quad -15a_1a_4-15a_2a_3+7,\
0 & = -40a_1^3a_3a_4+40a_1^2a_2^2a_4+40a_1^2a_2a_3^2-40a_1a_2^3a_3+8a_2^5-40a_1^3a_2+20a_1^2a_4^2\
&quad-20a_1a_2a_3a_4-20a_1a_3^3-20a_2^3a_4+20a_2^2a_3^2+40a_1^2a_3+40a_1a_2^2+10a_2a_4^2\
&quad +10a_3^2a_4-30a_1a_4-30a_2a_3+13.
endalign
However, it seems no hope for determination of $a_4$.
As some people said, the 2nd formula is easy to derive. In Maple, there are commands to get the minimal polynomial of LHS of the 2nd. The following method works for the 2nd formula, but not for the 3rd.
Prove that $sqrt[3]cosfrac2pi7 + sqrt[3]cosfrac4pi7 + sqrt[3]cosfrac6pi7 = sqrt[3]frac5-3sqrt[3]72$.
$textitProof$: $cosfrac2pi7,cosfrac4pi7,cosfrac6pi7$ are the three distinct real roots of $8x^3+4x^2-4x-1=0$.
Let $u_1=sqrt[3]cosfrac2pi7, u_2=sqrt[3]cosfrac4pi7, u_3=sqrt[3]cosfrac6pi7$ which are all real.
All roots of $8u^9+4u^6-4u^3-1=0$ are $u_1, t u_1, t^2 u_1, u_2, t u_2, t^2 u_2, u_3, t u_3, t^2 u_3$
where $t = e^2pi i/3$.
Let $(u-u_1)(u-u_2)(u-u_3)=u^3+a_2u^2+a_1u - 1/2$. We have
beginalign
(u-tu_1)(u-tu_2)(u-tu_3) &=u^3+ta_2u^2+t^2a_1u - 1/2, \
(u-t^2u_1)(u-t^2u_2)(u-t^2u_3) &=u^3+t^2a_2u^2+ta_1u - 1/2.
endalign
It follows from
beginalign
&8u^9+4u^6-4u^3-1 \
= & 8(u^3+a_2u^2+a_1u - 1/2)(u^3+ta_2u^2+t^2a_1u - 1/2)(u^3+t^2a_2u^2+ta_1u - 1/2)
endalign that
beginalign
a_2^3-3a_1a_2-2 &=0, \
4a_1^3+6a_1a_2+5 &= 0.
endalign
From these two equations, we get $a_1 = fraca_2^3-23a_2$
and $4a_2^9+30a_2^6+75a_2^3-32=0$.
Let $f(v)=4v^9+30v^6+75v^3-32$. We have $f'(v)=9v^2(2v^3+5)^2ge 0$. Thus, $f(v)=0$ has a unique real root.
It is easy to check that $v=-sqrt[3]frac5-3sqrt[3]72$ is a root of
$f(v)=0$. Thus, $a_2 = -sqrt[3]frac5-3sqrt[3]72$.
Thus, $u_1+u_2+u_3 = -a_2 = sqrt[3]frac5-3sqrt[3]72$. This completes the proof.
In general, suppose $x_1,x_2,x_3$ are the three distinct real roots of $x^3+bx^2+cx+d^3=0$,
where $b,c,d$ are rational numbers. We have
beginequation
sqrt[3]x_1+sqrt[3]x_2+sqrt[3]x_3 = sqrt[3]
-frac32Big(sqrt[3]Q+4sqrtDelta+sqrt[3]Q-4sqrtDeltaBig) -b-6d ,
endequation
where $Q = 24bd^2+36d^3+4bc+24cd, Delta = -4b^3d^3-27d^6+18bcd^3+b^2c^2-4c^3$.
Here, $Delta$ is the discriminant of $x^3+bx^2+cx+d^3=0$.
For the 3rd, similarly,
$x_k = cosfrac2kpi11, k=1,cdots, 5$ are the five distinct real roots of $32x^5+16x^4-32x^3-12x^2+6x+1=0$.
Let $u_1 = sqrt[5]cosfrac2pi11, u_2= sqrt[5]cosfrac4pi11, u_3 = sqrt[5]cosfrac6pi11, u_4 = sqrt[5]cosfrac8pi11, u_5= sqrt[5]cosfrac10pi11$.
All roots of $32u^25+16u^20-32u^15-12u^10+6u^5+1=0$ are
$t^j u_k, k=1,2,3,4, 5; j=0,1,2,3,4$ where $t= e^2pi i/5$.
Let $prod_k=1^5 (u-u_k) = u^5 + a_4u^4+a_3u^3+a_2u^2+a_1u+frac12$.
Similarly, we have four equations of
beginalign
0 & = a_4^5-5a_3a_4^3+5a_2a_4^2+5a_3^2a_4-5a_1a_4-5a_2a_3+2, \
0 & = 8a_1^5-20a_1^3a_2+10a_1^2a_3+10a_1a_2^2-5a_1a_4-5a_2a_3+1,\
0 & = -10a_1a_2a_4^3+10a_1a_3^2a_4^2+10a_2^2a_3a_4^2-10a_2a_3^3a_4+2a_3^5+10a_1^2a_4^2-10a_1a_2a_3a_4\
&quad-10a_1a_3^3-10a_2^3a_4+10a_2^2a_3^2-5a_3a_4^3+10a_1^2a_3+10a_1a_2^2+10a_2a_4^2+10a_3^2a_4\
&quad -15a_1a_4-15a_2a_3+7,\
0 & = -40a_1^3a_3a_4+40a_1^2a_2^2a_4+40a_1^2a_2a_3^2-40a_1a_2^3a_3+8a_2^5-40a_1^3a_2+20a_1^2a_4^2\
&quad-20a_1a_2a_3a_4-20a_1a_3^3-20a_2^3a_4+20a_2^2a_3^2+40a_1^2a_3+40a_1a_2^2+10a_2a_4^2\
&quad +10a_3^2a_4-30a_1a_4-30a_2a_3+13.
endalign
However, it seems no hope for determination of $a_4$.
edited Aug 17 at 3:53
answered Aug 17 at 2:53
River Li
193
193
2
I don't mean to be rude, by I find this utter unreadable. Could you perhaps make use of some displayed math environments (using$$ (math here) $$
) or the align environment (beginalign endalign
) to make it easier to follow? You can also find other formatting tips in the MathJax tutorial.
â Xander Henderson
Aug 17 at 3:19
add a comment |Â
2
I don't mean to be rude, by I find this utter unreadable. Could you perhaps make use of some displayed math environments (using$$ (math here) $$
) or the align environment (beginalign endalign
) to make it easier to follow? You can also find other formatting tips in the MathJax tutorial.
â Xander Henderson
Aug 17 at 3:19
2
2
I don't mean to be rude, by I find this utter unreadable. Could you perhaps make use of some displayed math environments (using
$$ (math here) $$
) or the align environment (beginalign endalign
) to make it easier to follow? You can also find other formatting tips in the MathJax tutorial.â Xander Henderson
Aug 17 at 3:19
I don't mean to be rude, by I find this utter unreadable. Could you perhaps make use of some displayed math environments (using
$$ (math here) $$
) or the align environment (beginalign endalign
) to make it easier to follow? You can also find other formatting tips in the MathJax tutorial.â Xander Henderson
Aug 17 at 3:19
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f612607%2fwhat-comes-after-cos-left-tfrac2-pi7-right1-3-cos-left-tfrac4-pi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
How have you derived the identities? For cubic, we can set $y=(frac z2)^frac13$ here in my answer math.stackexchange.com/questions/225088/⦠and then use Vieta's formula
â lab bhattacharjee
Dec 19 '13 at 5:53
The first is easy, while the second is at the end of mathworld.wolfram.com/TrigonometryAnglesPi7.html. The third is unknown.
â Tito Piezas III
Dec 19 '13 at 16:19
Are you sure about the first "identity"? In particular, $cos frac4pi5$ is negative, so taking square root of it results in purely imaginary number; so the sum of two terms is neither real, nor purely imaginary... and thus its square cannot be real.
â Peter Koà ¡inár
Dec 19 '13 at 22:40
1
@GrigoryM: What Ramanujan formula? Regarding (3), since $y^5=a_i$ has five roots, and we are to do so for five $a_i=cos(n)$, then I think it has maximum degree $5^5 = 3125$ though it may factor since the $a_i$ are not random. I tested the form $z=(y_1+y_2zeta^k+y_3zeta^2k+y_4zeta^3k+y_5zeta^4k)^5$ where the $y_i = cos(n)^1/5$ and $zeta^5=1$ and tried to form a 125-deg resolvent, but it still doesn't seem to be the minimal deg.
â Tito Piezas III
Dec 20 '13 at 20:03
1
I'm not sure there exists a (good) generalization in this direction â but maybe you'll find another generalization of the second formula of interest
â Grigory M
Jan 20 '14 at 8:33