About the group law on the extended square class group
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
We define a group law on the set
$$
Q(K) := mathbbZ/2mathbbZ times K^bullet/K^bullet 2
$$
as follows
beginalign*
(0, alpha) + (0, beta) &= (0, alpha beta) \
(1, alpha) + (0, beta) &= (1, alpha beta) \
(1, alpha) + (1, beta) &= (0, -alpha beta).
endalign*
It is trivial to check that, in fact, this satisfies the axioms of an abelian group.
$Q(K)$ is called the extended square class group.
Next, one checks equally trivially that
$$
(e,d) colon W(K) to Q(K)
$$
is a group homomorphism.
Thus, $e$ and $d$ together yield a reasonable invariant.
(Original image here.)
This is excerpt from W. Scharlau: Quadratic and Hermitian Forms,
page 37.
In this $Q(K)$ we define group law as given I don't understand what is third law saying $(1,alpha) + (1,beta) = (0,-alphabeta)$ is fine in first coordinate since it is from two element group but why $-alpha beta$ in second coordinate. Also how it satisfy abelian axioms? What I think is since both groups are abelian there cartesian product is also abelian. And last question is how to show it is homomorphisam?
linear-algebra abstract-algebra group-theory semigroups
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
We define a group law on the set
$$
Q(K) := mathbbZ/2mathbbZ times K^bullet/K^bullet 2
$$
as follows
beginalign*
(0, alpha) + (0, beta) &= (0, alpha beta) \
(1, alpha) + (0, beta) &= (1, alpha beta) \
(1, alpha) + (1, beta) &= (0, -alpha beta).
endalign*
It is trivial to check that, in fact, this satisfies the axioms of an abelian group.
$Q(K)$ is called the extended square class group.
Next, one checks equally trivially that
$$
(e,d) colon W(K) to Q(K)
$$
is a group homomorphism.
Thus, $e$ and $d$ together yield a reasonable invariant.
(Original image here.)
This is excerpt from W. Scharlau: Quadratic and Hermitian Forms,
page 37.
In this $Q(K)$ we define group law as given I don't understand what is third law saying $(1,alpha) + (1,beta) = (0,-alphabeta)$ is fine in first coordinate since it is from two element group but why $-alpha beta$ in second coordinate. Also how it satisfy abelian axioms? What I think is since both groups are abelian there cartesian product is also abelian. And last question is how to show it is homomorphisam?
linear-algebra abstract-algebra group-theory semigroups
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
We define a group law on the set
$$
Q(K) := mathbbZ/2mathbbZ times K^bullet/K^bullet 2
$$
as follows
beginalign*
(0, alpha) + (0, beta) &= (0, alpha beta) \
(1, alpha) + (0, beta) &= (1, alpha beta) \
(1, alpha) + (1, beta) &= (0, -alpha beta).
endalign*
It is trivial to check that, in fact, this satisfies the axioms of an abelian group.
$Q(K)$ is called the extended square class group.
Next, one checks equally trivially that
$$
(e,d) colon W(K) to Q(K)
$$
is a group homomorphism.
Thus, $e$ and $d$ together yield a reasonable invariant.
(Original image here.)
This is excerpt from W. Scharlau: Quadratic and Hermitian Forms,
page 37.
In this $Q(K)$ we define group law as given I don't understand what is third law saying $(1,alpha) + (1,beta) = (0,-alphabeta)$ is fine in first coordinate since it is from two element group but why $-alpha beta$ in second coordinate. Also how it satisfy abelian axioms? What I think is since both groups are abelian there cartesian product is also abelian. And last question is how to show it is homomorphisam?
linear-algebra abstract-algebra group-theory semigroups
We define a group law on the set
$$
Q(K) := mathbbZ/2mathbbZ times K^bullet/K^bullet 2
$$
as follows
beginalign*
(0, alpha) + (0, beta) &= (0, alpha beta) \
(1, alpha) + (0, beta) &= (1, alpha beta) \
(1, alpha) + (1, beta) &= (0, -alpha beta).
endalign*
It is trivial to check that, in fact, this satisfies the axioms of an abelian group.
$Q(K)$ is called the extended square class group.
Next, one checks equally trivially that
$$
(e,d) colon W(K) to Q(K)
$$
is a group homomorphism.
Thus, $e$ and $d$ together yield a reasonable invariant.
(Original image here.)
This is excerpt from W. Scharlau: Quadratic and Hermitian Forms,
page 37.
In this $Q(K)$ we define group law as given I don't understand what is third law saying $(1,alpha) + (1,beta) = (0,-alphabeta)$ is fine in first coordinate since it is from two element group but why $-alpha beta$ in second coordinate. Also how it satisfy abelian axioms? What I think is since both groups are abelian there cartesian product is also abelian. And last question is how to show it is homomorphisam?
linear-algebra abstract-algebra group-theory semigroups
edited Aug 21 at 17:39
Jendrik Stelzner
7,57221037
7,57221037
asked Aug 17 at 6:23
Ninja hatori
149113
149113
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
Let $G$ be a group containing an element $g$ of the center of $G$.
Let us define a law on the set $K = mathbbZ/2mathbbZ times G$ by setting
beginalign
(0,x)(0,y) &= (0,xy) \
(0,x)(1,y) &= (1,xy) \
(1,x)(0,y) &= (1,xy) \
(1,x)(1,y) &= (0,gxy)
endalign
I claim that $K$ is a group for this law. To check associativity, one needs to compare
$A = bigl((a,x)(b,y)bigr)(c,z)$ and $B = (a,x)bigl((b,y)(c,z)bigr)$. The only nontrivial case occur when at least two elements of the set $a, b, c$ are equal to $1$. Now,
beginalign
bigl((1,x)(1,y)bigr)(0,z) &= (0,gxy)(0,z) = (0,gxyz) = (1,x)(1,yz)= (1,x)bigl((1,y)(0,z)bigr) \
bigl((1,x)(0,y)bigr)(1,z) &= (1,xy)(1,z) = (0,gxyz) = (1,x)(1,yz)= (1,x)bigl((0,y)(1,z)bigr) \
bigl((0,x)(1,y)bigr)(1,z) &= (1,xy)(1,z) = (0,gxyz) = (0,x)(1,yz)= (0,x)bigl((1,y)(1,z)bigr) \
bigl((1,x)(1,y)bigr)(1,z) &= (1,gxy)(1,z) = (1,gxyz) = (1,x)(1,yz)= (1,x)bigl((1,y)(1,z)bigr)
endalign
Clearly $(0,1)$ is the identity element, the inverse of $(0,x)$ is $(0, x^-1)$ and the inverse of $(1,x)$ is $(1,g^-1x^-1)$. Thus $K$ is a group.
For your question, just take $g = -1$.
How to show it is homomorphism?
â Ninja hatori
Aug 20 at 8:07
Sorry, but since you do not define $e$ and $d$, it is not difficult to answer this part of your question...
â J.-E. Pin
Aug 20 at 8:09
Sorry for this but can you please go through book link ? I forgot to mention what e and d ? It is on previous pages of of the book link given in question.
â Ninja hatori
Aug 20 at 8:11
I am afraid this is not good practice on this site. Your question should be self-contained and should avoid including photos of page books. Links to books on Google should be given for reference, not for a crucial definition (you can refer to wikipedia, though). Think of the people answering your questions. It makes things much easier if it is possible to copy and paste your question in the answer.
â J.-E. Pin
Aug 20 at 8:37
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
Let $G$ be a group containing an element $g$ of the center of $G$.
Let us define a law on the set $K = mathbbZ/2mathbbZ times G$ by setting
beginalign
(0,x)(0,y) &= (0,xy) \
(0,x)(1,y) &= (1,xy) \
(1,x)(0,y) &= (1,xy) \
(1,x)(1,y) &= (0,gxy)
endalign
I claim that $K$ is a group for this law. To check associativity, one needs to compare
$A = bigl((a,x)(b,y)bigr)(c,z)$ and $B = (a,x)bigl((b,y)(c,z)bigr)$. The only nontrivial case occur when at least two elements of the set $a, b, c$ are equal to $1$. Now,
beginalign
bigl((1,x)(1,y)bigr)(0,z) &= (0,gxy)(0,z) = (0,gxyz) = (1,x)(1,yz)= (1,x)bigl((1,y)(0,z)bigr) \
bigl((1,x)(0,y)bigr)(1,z) &= (1,xy)(1,z) = (0,gxyz) = (1,x)(1,yz)= (1,x)bigl((0,y)(1,z)bigr) \
bigl((0,x)(1,y)bigr)(1,z) &= (1,xy)(1,z) = (0,gxyz) = (0,x)(1,yz)= (0,x)bigl((1,y)(1,z)bigr) \
bigl((1,x)(1,y)bigr)(1,z) &= (1,gxy)(1,z) = (1,gxyz) = (1,x)(1,yz)= (1,x)bigl((1,y)(1,z)bigr)
endalign
Clearly $(0,1)$ is the identity element, the inverse of $(0,x)$ is $(0, x^-1)$ and the inverse of $(1,x)$ is $(1,g^-1x^-1)$. Thus $K$ is a group.
For your question, just take $g = -1$.
How to show it is homomorphism?
â Ninja hatori
Aug 20 at 8:07
Sorry, but since you do not define $e$ and $d$, it is not difficult to answer this part of your question...
â J.-E. Pin
Aug 20 at 8:09
Sorry for this but can you please go through book link ? I forgot to mention what e and d ? It is on previous pages of of the book link given in question.
â Ninja hatori
Aug 20 at 8:11
I am afraid this is not good practice on this site. Your question should be self-contained and should avoid including photos of page books. Links to books on Google should be given for reference, not for a crucial definition (you can refer to wikipedia, though). Think of the people answering your questions. It makes things much easier if it is possible to copy and paste your question in the answer.
â J.-E. Pin
Aug 20 at 8:37
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
Let $G$ be a group containing an element $g$ of the center of $G$.
Let us define a law on the set $K = mathbbZ/2mathbbZ times G$ by setting
beginalign
(0,x)(0,y) &= (0,xy) \
(0,x)(1,y) &= (1,xy) \
(1,x)(0,y) &= (1,xy) \
(1,x)(1,y) &= (0,gxy)
endalign
I claim that $K$ is a group for this law. To check associativity, one needs to compare
$A = bigl((a,x)(b,y)bigr)(c,z)$ and $B = (a,x)bigl((b,y)(c,z)bigr)$. The only nontrivial case occur when at least two elements of the set $a, b, c$ are equal to $1$. Now,
beginalign
bigl((1,x)(1,y)bigr)(0,z) &= (0,gxy)(0,z) = (0,gxyz) = (1,x)(1,yz)= (1,x)bigl((1,y)(0,z)bigr) \
bigl((1,x)(0,y)bigr)(1,z) &= (1,xy)(1,z) = (0,gxyz) = (1,x)(1,yz)= (1,x)bigl((0,y)(1,z)bigr) \
bigl((0,x)(1,y)bigr)(1,z) &= (1,xy)(1,z) = (0,gxyz) = (0,x)(1,yz)= (0,x)bigl((1,y)(1,z)bigr) \
bigl((1,x)(1,y)bigr)(1,z) &= (1,gxy)(1,z) = (1,gxyz) = (1,x)(1,yz)= (1,x)bigl((1,y)(1,z)bigr)
endalign
Clearly $(0,1)$ is the identity element, the inverse of $(0,x)$ is $(0, x^-1)$ and the inverse of $(1,x)$ is $(1,g^-1x^-1)$. Thus $K$ is a group.
For your question, just take $g = -1$.
How to show it is homomorphism?
â Ninja hatori
Aug 20 at 8:07
Sorry, but since you do not define $e$ and $d$, it is not difficult to answer this part of your question...
â J.-E. Pin
Aug 20 at 8:09
Sorry for this but can you please go through book link ? I forgot to mention what e and d ? It is on previous pages of of the book link given in question.
â Ninja hatori
Aug 20 at 8:11
I am afraid this is not good practice on this site. Your question should be self-contained and should avoid including photos of page books. Links to books on Google should be given for reference, not for a crucial definition (you can refer to wikipedia, though). Think of the people answering your questions. It makes things much easier if it is possible to copy and paste your question in the answer.
â J.-E. Pin
Aug 20 at 8:37
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Let $G$ be a group containing an element $g$ of the center of $G$.
Let us define a law on the set $K = mathbbZ/2mathbbZ times G$ by setting
beginalign
(0,x)(0,y) &= (0,xy) \
(0,x)(1,y) &= (1,xy) \
(1,x)(0,y) &= (1,xy) \
(1,x)(1,y) &= (0,gxy)
endalign
I claim that $K$ is a group for this law. To check associativity, one needs to compare
$A = bigl((a,x)(b,y)bigr)(c,z)$ and $B = (a,x)bigl((b,y)(c,z)bigr)$. The only nontrivial case occur when at least two elements of the set $a, b, c$ are equal to $1$. Now,
beginalign
bigl((1,x)(1,y)bigr)(0,z) &= (0,gxy)(0,z) = (0,gxyz) = (1,x)(1,yz)= (1,x)bigl((1,y)(0,z)bigr) \
bigl((1,x)(0,y)bigr)(1,z) &= (1,xy)(1,z) = (0,gxyz) = (1,x)(1,yz)= (1,x)bigl((0,y)(1,z)bigr) \
bigl((0,x)(1,y)bigr)(1,z) &= (1,xy)(1,z) = (0,gxyz) = (0,x)(1,yz)= (0,x)bigl((1,y)(1,z)bigr) \
bigl((1,x)(1,y)bigr)(1,z) &= (1,gxy)(1,z) = (1,gxyz) = (1,x)(1,yz)= (1,x)bigl((1,y)(1,z)bigr)
endalign
Clearly $(0,1)$ is the identity element, the inverse of $(0,x)$ is $(0, x^-1)$ and the inverse of $(1,x)$ is $(1,g^-1x^-1)$. Thus $K$ is a group.
For your question, just take $g = -1$.
Let $G$ be a group containing an element $g$ of the center of $G$.
Let us define a law on the set $K = mathbbZ/2mathbbZ times G$ by setting
beginalign
(0,x)(0,y) &= (0,xy) \
(0,x)(1,y) &= (1,xy) \
(1,x)(0,y) &= (1,xy) \
(1,x)(1,y) &= (0,gxy)
endalign
I claim that $K$ is a group for this law. To check associativity, one needs to compare
$A = bigl((a,x)(b,y)bigr)(c,z)$ and $B = (a,x)bigl((b,y)(c,z)bigr)$. The only nontrivial case occur when at least two elements of the set $a, b, c$ are equal to $1$. Now,
beginalign
bigl((1,x)(1,y)bigr)(0,z) &= (0,gxy)(0,z) = (0,gxyz) = (1,x)(1,yz)= (1,x)bigl((1,y)(0,z)bigr) \
bigl((1,x)(0,y)bigr)(1,z) &= (1,xy)(1,z) = (0,gxyz) = (1,x)(1,yz)= (1,x)bigl((0,y)(1,z)bigr) \
bigl((0,x)(1,y)bigr)(1,z) &= (1,xy)(1,z) = (0,gxyz) = (0,x)(1,yz)= (0,x)bigl((1,y)(1,z)bigr) \
bigl((1,x)(1,y)bigr)(1,z) &= (1,gxy)(1,z) = (1,gxyz) = (1,x)(1,yz)= (1,x)bigl((1,y)(1,z)bigr)
endalign
Clearly $(0,1)$ is the identity element, the inverse of $(0,x)$ is $(0, x^-1)$ and the inverse of $(1,x)$ is $(1,g^-1x^-1)$. Thus $K$ is a group.
For your question, just take $g = -1$.
answered Aug 20 at 7:36
J.-E. Pin
17.4k21753
17.4k21753
How to show it is homomorphism?
â Ninja hatori
Aug 20 at 8:07
Sorry, but since you do not define $e$ and $d$, it is not difficult to answer this part of your question...
â J.-E. Pin
Aug 20 at 8:09
Sorry for this but can you please go through book link ? I forgot to mention what e and d ? It is on previous pages of of the book link given in question.
â Ninja hatori
Aug 20 at 8:11
I am afraid this is not good practice on this site. Your question should be self-contained and should avoid including photos of page books. Links to books on Google should be given for reference, not for a crucial definition (you can refer to wikipedia, though). Think of the people answering your questions. It makes things much easier if it is possible to copy and paste your question in the answer.
â J.-E. Pin
Aug 20 at 8:37
add a comment |Â
How to show it is homomorphism?
â Ninja hatori
Aug 20 at 8:07
Sorry, but since you do not define $e$ and $d$, it is not difficult to answer this part of your question...
â J.-E. Pin
Aug 20 at 8:09
Sorry for this but can you please go through book link ? I forgot to mention what e and d ? It is on previous pages of of the book link given in question.
â Ninja hatori
Aug 20 at 8:11
I am afraid this is not good practice on this site. Your question should be self-contained and should avoid including photos of page books. Links to books on Google should be given for reference, not for a crucial definition (you can refer to wikipedia, though). Think of the people answering your questions. It makes things much easier if it is possible to copy and paste your question in the answer.
â J.-E. Pin
Aug 20 at 8:37
How to show it is homomorphism?
â Ninja hatori
Aug 20 at 8:07
How to show it is homomorphism?
â Ninja hatori
Aug 20 at 8:07
Sorry, but since you do not define $e$ and $d$, it is not difficult to answer this part of your question...
â J.-E. Pin
Aug 20 at 8:09
Sorry, but since you do not define $e$ and $d$, it is not difficult to answer this part of your question...
â J.-E. Pin
Aug 20 at 8:09
Sorry for this but can you please go through book link ? I forgot to mention what e and d ? It is on previous pages of of the book link given in question.
â Ninja hatori
Aug 20 at 8:11
Sorry for this but can you please go through book link ? I forgot to mention what e and d ? It is on previous pages of of the book link given in question.
â Ninja hatori
Aug 20 at 8:11
I am afraid this is not good practice on this site. Your question should be self-contained and should avoid including photos of page books. Links to books on Google should be given for reference, not for a crucial definition (you can refer to wikipedia, though). Think of the people answering your questions. It makes things much easier if it is possible to copy and paste your question in the answer.
â J.-E. Pin
Aug 20 at 8:37
I am afraid this is not good practice on this site. Your question should be self-contained and should avoid including photos of page books. Links to books on Google should be given for reference, not for a crucial definition (you can refer to wikipedia, though). Think of the people answering your questions. It makes things much easier if it is possible to copy and paste your question in the answer.
â J.-E. Pin
Aug 20 at 8:37
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2885456%2fabout-the-group-law-on-the-extended-square-class-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password