What is the relationship between 1/7, 1/11, 1/13, and the number 1001?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
19
down vote

favorite
6












Here is what we have:



 1/7 = 0.142857...
1/11 = 0.090909...
1/13 = 0.076923...


Notice that if you add the first three digits to the next three digits, you always get 999:



142 + 857 = 999
090 + 909 = 999
076 + 923 = 999


Oddly, the same thing happens with 2/7, 2/11, 2/13, and so on, as the numerator increases: adding the first three digits to the next three digit results in 999.



OK. Multiplying the denominators 7 x 11 x 13 results in 1001.



What is the relationship between the fraction series x/7, x/11, x/13, and the result of multiplying the denominators?



(This is taken from an example in the book "Ten Ways to Destroy the Imagination of Your Child" by Anthony Esolen. The examples above are presented separately, and the reader is encouraged to be imaginative in discovering how they are related. After almost 20 years of playing math/CS games, I suppose I still have no imagination to solve this kind of thing.)










share|cite|improve this question



















  • 1




    Hint: $;1001 cdot 1/7 = (1 + 1000)cdot 1/7 = 0.overline142 857 + 142.overline857 142 = colorred142.overline142 857 + 857 142,$. On the other hand $1000 cdot 1/7 = 143 = colorred142.overline9,$.
    – dxiv
    Sep 1 at 2:53











  • I propose to call it $underlineScheherazade text Phenomenon$...
    – DVD
    Sep 9 at 21:45















up vote
19
down vote

favorite
6












Here is what we have:



 1/7 = 0.142857...
1/11 = 0.090909...
1/13 = 0.076923...


Notice that if you add the first three digits to the next three digits, you always get 999:



142 + 857 = 999
090 + 909 = 999
076 + 923 = 999


Oddly, the same thing happens with 2/7, 2/11, 2/13, and so on, as the numerator increases: adding the first three digits to the next three digit results in 999.



OK. Multiplying the denominators 7 x 11 x 13 results in 1001.



What is the relationship between the fraction series x/7, x/11, x/13, and the result of multiplying the denominators?



(This is taken from an example in the book "Ten Ways to Destroy the Imagination of Your Child" by Anthony Esolen. The examples above are presented separately, and the reader is encouraged to be imaginative in discovering how they are related. After almost 20 years of playing math/CS games, I suppose I still have no imagination to solve this kind of thing.)










share|cite|improve this question



















  • 1




    Hint: $;1001 cdot 1/7 = (1 + 1000)cdot 1/7 = 0.overline142 857 + 142.overline857 142 = colorred142.overline142 857 + 857 142,$. On the other hand $1000 cdot 1/7 = 143 = colorred142.overline9,$.
    – dxiv
    Sep 1 at 2:53











  • I propose to call it $underlineScheherazade text Phenomenon$...
    – DVD
    Sep 9 at 21:45













up vote
19
down vote

favorite
6









up vote
19
down vote

favorite
6






6





Here is what we have:



 1/7 = 0.142857...
1/11 = 0.090909...
1/13 = 0.076923...


Notice that if you add the first three digits to the next three digits, you always get 999:



142 + 857 = 999
090 + 909 = 999
076 + 923 = 999


Oddly, the same thing happens with 2/7, 2/11, 2/13, and so on, as the numerator increases: adding the first three digits to the next three digit results in 999.



OK. Multiplying the denominators 7 x 11 x 13 results in 1001.



What is the relationship between the fraction series x/7, x/11, x/13, and the result of multiplying the denominators?



(This is taken from an example in the book "Ten Ways to Destroy the Imagination of Your Child" by Anthony Esolen. The examples above are presented separately, and the reader is encouraged to be imaginative in discovering how they are related. After almost 20 years of playing math/CS games, I suppose I still have no imagination to solve this kind of thing.)










share|cite|improve this question















Here is what we have:



 1/7 = 0.142857...
1/11 = 0.090909...
1/13 = 0.076923...


Notice that if you add the first three digits to the next three digits, you always get 999:



142 + 857 = 999
090 + 909 = 999
076 + 923 = 999


Oddly, the same thing happens with 2/7, 2/11, 2/13, and so on, as the numerator increases: adding the first three digits to the next three digit results in 999.



OK. Multiplying the denominators 7 x 11 x 13 results in 1001.



What is the relationship between the fraction series x/7, x/11, x/13, and the result of multiplying the denominators?



(This is taken from an example in the book "Ten Ways to Destroy the Imagination of Your Child" by Anthony Esolen. The examples above are presented separately, and the reader is encouraged to be imaginative in discovering how they are related. After almost 20 years of playing math/CS games, I suppose I still have no imagination to solve this kind of thing.)







sequences-and-series recreational-mathematics puzzle






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Sep 2 at 11:04

























asked Sep 1 at 2:34









JonathanDavidArndt

21613




21613







  • 1




    Hint: $;1001 cdot 1/7 = (1 + 1000)cdot 1/7 = 0.overline142 857 + 142.overline857 142 = colorred142.overline142 857 + 857 142,$. On the other hand $1000 cdot 1/7 = 143 = colorred142.overline9,$.
    – dxiv
    Sep 1 at 2:53











  • I propose to call it $underlineScheherazade text Phenomenon$...
    – DVD
    Sep 9 at 21:45













  • 1




    Hint: $;1001 cdot 1/7 = (1 + 1000)cdot 1/7 = 0.overline142 857 + 142.overline857 142 = colorred142.overline142 857 + 857 142,$. On the other hand $1000 cdot 1/7 = 143 = colorred142.overline9,$.
    – dxiv
    Sep 1 at 2:53











  • I propose to call it $underlineScheherazade text Phenomenon$...
    – DVD
    Sep 9 at 21:45








1




1




Hint: $;1001 cdot 1/7 = (1 + 1000)cdot 1/7 = 0.overline142 857 + 142.overline857 142 = colorred142.overline142 857 + 857 142,$. On the other hand $1000 cdot 1/7 = 143 = colorred142.overline9,$.
– dxiv
Sep 1 at 2:53





Hint: $;1001 cdot 1/7 = (1 + 1000)cdot 1/7 = 0.overline142 857 + 142.overline857 142 = colorred142.overline142 857 + 857 142,$. On the other hand $1000 cdot 1/7 = 143 = colorred142.overline9,$.
– dxiv
Sep 1 at 2:53













I propose to call it $underlineScheherazade text Phenomenon$...
– DVD
Sep 9 at 21:45





I propose to call it $underlineScheherazade text Phenomenon$...
– DVD
Sep 9 at 21:45











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
23
down vote



accepted










The relationship is that $frac17=frac11times131001$, $frac111=frac7times131001$ and $frac113=frac7times111001$, and the pattern of adding three digits to the next three digits to get $999$ works for any fraction $fracn1001$ (apart from the ones that are integers, like $frac10011001$ or $frac20021001$) and for no other number.



Let's see what multiplying any number by $1001$ does. We have
$$
1001x=(1000+1)x=1000x+x
$$
So multiplying a number $x$ by $1001$ is the same as taking two copies of $x$, multiply one of them by $1000$ (which has the effect of moving all the digits of $x$ three places to the left), then add them together.



Now, what's special about the numbers $frac n1001$ (again, apart from the ones which are already integers) is that they are the only numbers which are not integers, but multiplying them by $1001$ makes them integers. If we use the above interpretation of multiplying by $1001$, the only way that can happen is if after doing the addition, we're left with something with decimal part $.999999ldots$ (you can try to find examples which make it $.000000ldots$, but you will not succeed). This means exactly that any three digits of the decimal expansion of $frac n1001$, plus the next three digits must add up to $999$.



(They could, conceivably, add up to $1998$, and let the $1$ carry into the next set of three, but since $1998=999+999$, that means that we would have to start with $.999999ldots$ already, meaning what we have is an integer. And we're not considering those.)






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • A corresponding pattern holds true for any denominator of the form $10^k+1$ with $kgeq1$: for $frac n11$, one digit plus the next is $9$. For $frac n101$, two digits plus the next two gives $99$. And so on. You may also find it intriguing to study the expansions of fractions with denominators $10^k-1$.
    – Arthur
    Sep 1 at 4:25


















up vote
2
down vote













Knowing how this phenomenon came to happen (e.g. as explained in Arthurs answer), you can construct similar ones. E.g. You can factor



$$10^colorred4+1=73times 137.$$



You will observe that subdividing the decimal digits of the reciprocals of these factors into blocks of length $colorredtextfour$ will give you sums of $9,!999$:



beginalign
1/73& = 0.underline0136overline9863underline0136overline9863...\[1ex]
1/137 &= 0.underline0072overline9927underline0072overline9927...
endalign




Further, $1/7$, $1/11$ and $1/13$ also are special for other block lengths: e.g. they give the sum $999,!999,!999$ when using block length $colorbluetextnine$ (not very surprising). However, there are other such numbers: $1/19$ and $1/52579$. The reason is that



$$10^colorblue9+1=7times 11times 13times 19times 52579.$$






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • Oh wow. This compliments Arthur's answer so well! While his answer makes sense to me, I have had trouble applying his explanation to the general situation, so that I could construct (or discover) similar patterns in other number sets (and until I can do that, I can't really say that I understand the phenomenon). Thank you!
    – JonathanDavidArndt
    Sep 5 at 11:42


















up vote
1
down vote













(I). A number $R$ between $0$ and $1$ is represented decimally as $0.ABCDEFABCDEF...$ iff $10^6R$ is represented as $ABCDEF. ABCDEFABCDEF...$ Subtracting, we see that $(10^6-1)R$ is represented as $ABCDEF.$



(II). The digit-sequence $ABC$ represents the number $X=10^2A+10B +C$ and the digit-sequence $DEF$ represents the number $Y=10^2D+10E+F .$ Now $Y=999-X$ iff the digit-sequence $ABCDEF$ represents $(1000 X)+(999-X)=(999)(1+X). $



(III). Combining (I) and (II) we see that $X+Y=999$ iff $ (10^6-1)R=(999)(1+X)$ iff $(999)(1001)R=(999)(1+X)$ iff $$R=frac 1+X1001=frac 1+X(7)(11)(13).$$



Now $1+X=1+(10^2A+10B+C)$ can be any integer from $1$ to $1000.$ For example if $X=285$ then $(1+X)/1001=286/1001=2/7.$ Or if $X=64$ then $(1+X)/1001=65/1001=5/77.$






share|cite|improve this answer




















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2901300%2fwhat-is-the-relationship-between-1-7-1-11-1-13-and-the-number-1001%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    23
    down vote



    accepted










    The relationship is that $frac17=frac11times131001$, $frac111=frac7times131001$ and $frac113=frac7times111001$, and the pattern of adding three digits to the next three digits to get $999$ works for any fraction $fracn1001$ (apart from the ones that are integers, like $frac10011001$ or $frac20021001$) and for no other number.



    Let's see what multiplying any number by $1001$ does. We have
    $$
    1001x=(1000+1)x=1000x+x
    $$
    So multiplying a number $x$ by $1001$ is the same as taking two copies of $x$, multiply one of them by $1000$ (which has the effect of moving all the digits of $x$ three places to the left), then add them together.



    Now, what's special about the numbers $frac n1001$ (again, apart from the ones which are already integers) is that they are the only numbers which are not integers, but multiplying them by $1001$ makes them integers. If we use the above interpretation of multiplying by $1001$, the only way that can happen is if after doing the addition, we're left with something with decimal part $.999999ldots$ (you can try to find examples which make it $.000000ldots$, but you will not succeed). This means exactly that any three digits of the decimal expansion of $frac n1001$, plus the next three digits must add up to $999$.



    (They could, conceivably, add up to $1998$, and let the $1$ carry into the next set of three, but since $1998=999+999$, that means that we would have to start with $.999999ldots$ already, meaning what we have is an integer. And we're not considering those.)






    share|cite|improve this answer






















    • A corresponding pattern holds true for any denominator of the form $10^k+1$ with $kgeq1$: for $frac n11$, one digit plus the next is $9$. For $frac n101$, two digits plus the next two gives $99$. And so on. You may also find it intriguing to study the expansions of fractions with denominators $10^k-1$.
      – Arthur
      Sep 1 at 4:25















    up vote
    23
    down vote



    accepted










    The relationship is that $frac17=frac11times131001$, $frac111=frac7times131001$ and $frac113=frac7times111001$, and the pattern of adding three digits to the next three digits to get $999$ works for any fraction $fracn1001$ (apart from the ones that are integers, like $frac10011001$ or $frac20021001$) and for no other number.



    Let's see what multiplying any number by $1001$ does. We have
    $$
    1001x=(1000+1)x=1000x+x
    $$
    So multiplying a number $x$ by $1001$ is the same as taking two copies of $x$, multiply one of them by $1000$ (which has the effect of moving all the digits of $x$ three places to the left), then add them together.



    Now, what's special about the numbers $frac n1001$ (again, apart from the ones which are already integers) is that they are the only numbers which are not integers, but multiplying them by $1001$ makes them integers. If we use the above interpretation of multiplying by $1001$, the only way that can happen is if after doing the addition, we're left with something with decimal part $.999999ldots$ (you can try to find examples which make it $.000000ldots$, but you will not succeed). This means exactly that any three digits of the decimal expansion of $frac n1001$, plus the next three digits must add up to $999$.



    (They could, conceivably, add up to $1998$, and let the $1$ carry into the next set of three, but since $1998=999+999$, that means that we would have to start with $.999999ldots$ already, meaning what we have is an integer. And we're not considering those.)






    share|cite|improve this answer






















    • A corresponding pattern holds true for any denominator of the form $10^k+1$ with $kgeq1$: for $frac n11$, one digit plus the next is $9$. For $frac n101$, two digits plus the next two gives $99$. And so on. You may also find it intriguing to study the expansions of fractions with denominators $10^k-1$.
      – Arthur
      Sep 1 at 4:25













    up vote
    23
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    23
    down vote



    accepted






    The relationship is that $frac17=frac11times131001$, $frac111=frac7times131001$ and $frac113=frac7times111001$, and the pattern of adding three digits to the next three digits to get $999$ works for any fraction $fracn1001$ (apart from the ones that are integers, like $frac10011001$ or $frac20021001$) and for no other number.



    Let's see what multiplying any number by $1001$ does. We have
    $$
    1001x=(1000+1)x=1000x+x
    $$
    So multiplying a number $x$ by $1001$ is the same as taking two copies of $x$, multiply one of them by $1000$ (which has the effect of moving all the digits of $x$ three places to the left), then add them together.



    Now, what's special about the numbers $frac n1001$ (again, apart from the ones which are already integers) is that they are the only numbers which are not integers, but multiplying them by $1001$ makes them integers. If we use the above interpretation of multiplying by $1001$, the only way that can happen is if after doing the addition, we're left with something with decimal part $.999999ldots$ (you can try to find examples which make it $.000000ldots$, but you will not succeed). This means exactly that any three digits of the decimal expansion of $frac n1001$, plus the next three digits must add up to $999$.



    (They could, conceivably, add up to $1998$, and let the $1$ carry into the next set of three, but since $1998=999+999$, that means that we would have to start with $.999999ldots$ already, meaning what we have is an integer. And we're not considering those.)






    share|cite|improve this answer














    The relationship is that $frac17=frac11times131001$, $frac111=frac7times131001$ and $frac113=frac7times111001$, and the pattern of adding three digits to the next three digits to get $999$ works for any fraction $fracn1001$ (apart from the ones that are integers, like $frac10011001$ or $frac20021001$) and for no other number.



    Let's see what multiplying any number by $1001$ does. We have
    $$
    1001x=(1000+1)x=1000x+x
    $$
    So multiplying a number $x$ by $1001$ is the same as taking two copies of $x$, multiply one of them by $1000$ (which has the effect of moving all the digits of $x$ three places to the left), then add them together.



    Now, what's special about the numbers $frac n1001$ (again, apart from the ones which are already integers) is that they are the only numbers which are not integers, but multiplying them by $1001$ makes them integers. If we use the above interpretation of multiplying by $1001$, the only way that can happen is if after doing the addition, we're left with something with decimal part $.999999ldots$ (you can try to find examples which make it $.000000ldots$, but you will not succeed). This means exactly that any three digits of the decimal expansion of $frac n1001$, plus the next three digits must add up to $999$.



    (They could, conceivably, add up to $1998$, and let the $1$ carry into the next set of three, but since $1998=999+999$, that means that we would have to start with $.999999ldots$ already, meaning what we have is an integer. And we're not considering those.)







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Sep 1 at 3:03

























    answered Sep 1 at 2:47









    Arthur

    102k795176




    102k795176











    • A corresponding pattern holds true for any denominator of the form $10^k+1$ with $kgeq1$: for $frac n11$, one digit plus the next is $9$. For $frac n101$, two digits plus the next two gives $99$. And so on. You may also find it intriguing to study the expansions of fractions with denominators $10^k-1$.
      – Arthur
      Sep 1 at 4:25

















    • A corresponding pattern holds true for any denominator of the form $10^k+1$ with $kgeq1$: for $frac n11$, one digit plus the next is $9$. For $frac n101$, two digits plus the next two gives $99$. And so on. You may also find it intriguing to study the expansions of fractions with denominators $10^k-1$.
      – Arthur
      Sep 1 at 4:25
















    A corresponding pattern holds true for any denominator of the form $10^k+1$ with $kgeq1$: for $frac n11$, one digit plus the next is $9$. For $frac n101$, two digits plus the next two gives $99$. And so on. You may also find it intriguing to study the expansions of fractions with denominators $10^k-1$.
    – Arthur
    Sep 1 at 4:25





    A corresponding pattern holds true for any denominator of the form $10^k+1$ with $kgeq1$: for $frac n11$, one digit plus the next is $9$. For $frac n101$, two digits plus the next two gives $99$. And so on. You may also find it intriguing to study the expansions of fractions with denominators $10^k-1$.
    – Arthur
    Sep 1 at 4:25











    up vote
    2
    down vote













    Knowing how this phenomenon came to happen (e.g. as explained in Arthurs answer), you can construct similar ones. E.g. You can factor



    $$10^colorred4+1=73times 137.$$



    You will observe that subdividing the decimal digits of the reciprocals of these factors into blocks of length $colorredtextfour$ will give you sums of $9,!999$:



    beginalign
    1/73& = 0.underline0136overline9863underline0136overline9863...\[1ex]
    1/137 &= 0.underline0072overline9927underline0072overline9927...
    endalign




    Further, $1/7$, $1/11$ and $1/13$ also are special for other block lengths: e.g. they give the sum $999,!999,!999$ when using block length $colorbluetextnine$ (not very surprising). However, there are other such numbers: $1/19$ and $1/52579$. The reason is that



    $$10^colorblue9+1=7times 11times 13times 19times 52579.$$






    share|cite|improve this answer






















    • Oh wow. This compliments Arthur's answer so well! While his answer makes sense to me, I have had trouble applying his explanation to the general situation, so that I could construct (or discover) similar patterns in other number sets (and until I can do that, I can't really say that I understand the phenomenon). Thank you!
      – JonathanDavidArndt
      Sep 5 at 11:42















    up vote
    2
    down vote













    Knowing how this phenomenon came to happen (e.g. as explained in Arthurs answer), you can construct similar ones. E.g. You can factor



    $$10^colorred4+1=73times 137.$$



    You will observe that subdividing the decimal digits of the reciprocals of these factors into blocks of length $colorredtextfour$ will give you sums of $9,!999$:



    beginalign
    1/73& = 0.underline0136overline9863underline0136overline9863...\[1ex]
    1/137 &= 0.underline0072overline9927underline0072overline9927...
    endalign




    Further, $1/7$, $1/11$ and $1/13$ also are special for other block lengths: e.g. they give the sum $999,!999,!999$ when using block length $colorbluetextnine$ (not very surprising). However, there are other such numbers: $1/19$ and $1/52579$. The reason is that



    $$10^colorblue9+1=7times 11times 13times 19times 52579.$$






    share|cite|improve this answer






















    • Oh wow. This compliments Arthur's answer so well! While his answer makes sense to me, I have had trouble applying his explanation to the general situation, so that I could construct (or discover) similar patterns in other number sets (and until I can do that, I can't really say that I understand the phenomenon). Thank you!
      – JonathanDavidArndt
      Sep 5 at 11:42













    up vote
    2
    down vote










    up vote
    2
    down vote









    Knowing how this phenomenon came to happen (e.g. as explained in Arthurs answer), you can construct similar ones. E.g. You can factor



    $$10^colorred4+1=73times 137.$$



    You will observe that subdividing the decimal digits of the reciprocals of these factors into blocks of length $colorredtextfour$ will give you sums of $9,!999$:



    beginalign
    1/73& = 0.underline0136overline9863underline0136overline9863...\[1ex]
    1/137 &= 0.underline0072overline9927underline0072overline9927...
    endalign




    Further, $1/7$, $1/11$ and $1/13$ also are special for other block lengths: e.g. they give the sum $999,!999,!999$ when using block length $colorbluetextnine$ (not very surprising). However, there are other such numbers: $1/19$ and $1/52579$. The reason is that



    $$10^colorblue9+1=7times 11times 13times 19times 52579.$$






    share|cite|improve this answer














    Knowing how this phenomenon came to happen (e.g. as explained in Arthurs answer), you can construct similar ones. E.g. You can factor



    $$10^colorred4+1=73times 137.$$



    You will observe that subdividing the decimal digits of the reciprocals of these factors into blocks of length $colorredtextfour$ will give you sums of $9,!999$:



    beginalign
    1/73& = 0.underline0136overline9863underline0136overline9863...\[1ex]
    1/137 &= 0.underline0072overline9927underline0072overline9927...
    endalign




    Further, $1/7$, $1/11$ and $1/13$ also are special for other block lengths: e.g. they give the sum $999,!999,!999$ when using block length $colorbluetextnine$ (not very surprising). However, there are other such numbers: $1/19$ and $1/52579$. The reason is that



    $$10^colorblue9+1=7times 11times 13times 19times 52579.$$







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Sep 5 at 13:37

























    answered Sep 5 at 8:49









    M. Winter

    18.1k62764




    18.1k62764











    • Oh wow. This compliments Arthur's answer so well! While his answer makes sense to me, I have had trouble applying his explanation to the general situation, so that I could construct (or discover) similar patterns in other number sets (and until I can do that, I can't really say that I understand the phenomenon). Thank you!
      – JonathanDavidArndt
      Sep 5 at 11:42

















    • Oh wow. This compliments Arthur's answer so well! While his answer makes sense to me, I have had trouble applying his explanation to the general situation, so that I could construct (or discover) similar patterns in other number sets (and until I can do that, I can't really say that I understand the phenomenon). Thank you!
      – JonathanDavidArndt
      Sep 5 at 11:42
















    Oh wow. This compliments Arthur's answer so well! While his answer makes sense to me, I have had trouble applying his explanation to the general situation, so that I could construct (or discover) similar patterns in other number sets (and until I can do that, I can't really say that I understand the phenomenon). Thank you!
    – JonathanDavidArndt
    Sep 5 at 11:42





    Oh wow. This compliments Arthur's answer so well! While his answer makes sense to me, I have had trouble applying his explanation to the general situation, so that I could construct (or discover) similar patterns in other number sets (and until I can do that, I can't really say that I understand the phenomenon). Thank you!
    – JonathanDavidArndt
    Sep 5 at 11:42











    up vote
    1
    down vote













    (I). A number $R$ between $0$ and $1$ is represented decimally as $0.ABCDEFABCDEF...$ iff $10^6R$ is represented as $ABCDEF. ABCDEFABCDEF...$ Subtracting, we see that $(10^6-1)R$ is represented as $ABCDEF.$



    (II). The digit-sequence $ABC$ represents the number $X=10^2A+10B +C$ and the digit-sequence $DEF$ represents the number $Y=10^2D+10E+F .$ Now $Y=999-X$ iff the digit-sequence $ABCDEF$ represents $(1000 X)+(999-X)=(999)(1+X). $



    (III). Combining (I) and (II) we see that $X+Y=999$ iff $ (10^6-1)R=(999)(1+X)$ iff $(999)(1001)R=(999)(1+X)$ iff $$R=frac 1+X1001=frac 1+X(7)(11)(13).$$



    Now $1+X=1+(10^2A+10B+C)$ can be any integer from $1$ to $1000.$ For example if $X=285$ then $(1+X)/1001=286/1001=2/7.$ Or if $X=64$ then $(1+X)/1001=65/1001=5/77.$






    share|cite|improve this answer
























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      (I). A number $R$ between $0$ and $1$ is represented decimally as $0.ABCDEFABCDEF...$ iff $10^6R$ is represented as $ABCDEF. ABCDEFABCDEF...$ Subtracting, we see that $(10^6-1)R$ is represented as $ABCDEF.$



      (II). The digit-sequence $ABC$ represents the number $X=10^2A+10B +C$ and the digit-sequence $DEF$ represents the number $Y=10^2D+10E+F .$ Now $Y=999-X$ iff the digit-sequence $ABCDEF$ represents $(1000 X)+(999-X)=(999)(1+X). $



      (III). Combining (I) and (II) we see that $X+Y=999$ iff $ (10^6-1)R=(999)(1+X)$ iff $(999)(1001)R=(999)(1+X)$ iff $$R=frac 1+X1001=frac 1+X(7)(11)(13).$$



      Now $1+X=1+(10^2A+10B+C)$ can be any integer from $1$ to $1000.$ For example if $X=285$ then $(1+X)/1001=286/1001=2/7.$ Or if $X=64$ then $(1+X)/1001=65/1001=5/77.$






      share|cite|improve this answer






















        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        (I). A number $R$ between $0$ and $1$ is represented decimally as $0.ABCDEFABCDEF...$ iff $10^6R$ is represented as $ABCDEF. ABCDEFABCDEF...$ Subtracting, we see that $(10^6-1)R$ is represented as $ABCDEF.$



        (II). The digit-sequence $ABC$ represents the number $X=10^2A+10B +C$ and the digit-sequence $DEF$ represents the number $Y=10^2D+10E+F .$ Now $Y=999-X$ iff the digit-sequence $ABCDEF$ represents $(1000 X)+(999-X)=(999)(1+X). $



        (III). Combining (I) and (II) we see that $X+Y=999$ iff $ (10^6-1)R=(999)(1+X)$ iff $(999)(1001)R=(999)(1+X)$ iff $$R=frac 1+X1001=frac 1+X(7)(11)(13).$$



        Now $1+X=1+(10^2A+10B+C)$ can be any integer from $1$ to $1000.$ For example if $X=285$ then $(1+X)/1001=286/1001=2/7.$ Or if $X=64$ then $(1+X)/1001=65/1001=5/77.$






        share|cite|improve this answer












        (I). A number $R$ between $0$ and $1$ is represented decimally as $0.ABCDEFABCDEF...$ iff $10^6R$ is represented as $ABCDEF. ABCDEFABCDEF...$ Subtracting, we see that $(10^6-1)R$ is represented as $ABCDEF.$



        (II). The digit-sequence $ABC$ represents the number $X=10^2A+10B +C$ and the digit-sequence $DEF$ represents the number $Y=10^2D+10E+F .$ Now $Y=999-X$ iff the digit-sequence $ABCDEF$ represents $(1000 X)+(999-X)=(999)(1+X). $



        (III). Combining (I) and (II) we see that $X+Y=999$ iff $ (10^6-1)R=(999)(1+X)$ iff $(999)(1001)R=(999)(1+X)$ iff $$R=frac 1+X1001=frac 1+X(7)(11)(13).$$



        Now $1+X=1+(10^2A+10B+C)$ can be any integer from $1$ to $1000.$ For example if $X=285$ then $(1+X)/1001=286/1001=2/7.$ Or if $X=64$ then $(1+X)/1001=65/1001=5/77.$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Sep 2 at 6:53









        DanielWainfleet

        32.1k31644




        32.1k31644



























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2901300%2fwhat-is-the-relationship-between-1-7-1-11-1-13-and-the-number-1001%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            這個網誌中的熱門文章

            How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

            Mutual Information Always Non-negative

            Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?