3 travelers and 9 diamonds

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
9
down vote

favorite
4












I think this is the most appropriate place to share this. I haven't figured out the answer yet, but I think I'm close. I couldn't find anything like this on the Internet, so I'm posting it here.



There are three travelers. They are inside a cave. Deep down in this cave, there are three doors, each door containing at least one diamond, and there are a total of 9 diamonds. Each traveler picks a door and gets the diamonds behind it.



The travelers loot their diamonds, and, before exiting the cave, all three must say simultaneously if they can deduce the number of diamonds that each of the other two have. They never lie, and all of them said they couldn't deduce it.



After these statements were said, one of the travelers realized that now he knows the answer.



So the question is:




How were the diamonds split between the three travelers? (the order doesn't matter)




I was going to write what I've managed to do so far, but I think it isn't a good idea to give away too much information even if its concealed by spoilers. This riddle was suggested by my discrete mathematics professor. It isn't homework and she didn't mention where it came from.










share|improve this question























  • Welcome to Puzzling.SE! May I ask where you found this riddle?
    – Riley
    Sep 1 at 0:28










  • Unfortunately I don't know either.
    – AtAn
    Sep 1 at 0:35










  • I have a question : When one of the travelers knew the answer, did he say that out loud? @AtAn
    – Kevin L
    Sep 1 at 1:10










  • Yes. sorry, I thought that was explicit enough.
    – AtAn
    Sep 1 at 1:22






  • 2




    Yes he can immediately deduce. I think that's what OP means by "the order doesn't matter".
    – sedrick
    Sep 1 at 1:47















up vote
9
down vote

favorite
4












I think this is the most appropriate place to share this. I haven't figured out the answer yet, but I think I'm close. I couldn't find anything like this on the Internet, so I'm posting it here.



There are three travelers. They are inside a cave. Deep down in this cave, there are three doors, each door containing at least one diamond, and there are a total of 9 diamonds. Each traveler picks a door and gets the diamonds behind it.



The travelers loot their diamonds, and, before exiting the cave, all three must say simultaneously if they can deduce the number of diamonds that each of the other two have. They never lie, and all of them said they couldn't deduce it.



After these statements were said, one of the travelers realized that now he knows the answer.



So the question is:




How were the diamonds split between the three travelers? (the order doesn't matter)




I was going to write what I've managed to do so far, but I think it isn't a good idea to give away too much information even if its concealed by spoilers. This riddle was suggested by my discrete mathematics professor. It isn't homework and she didn't mention where it came from.










share|improve this question























  • Welcome to Puzzling.SE! May I ask where you found this riddle?
    – Riley
    Sep 1 at 0:28










  • Unfortunately I don't know either.
    – AtAn
    Sep 1 at 0:35










  • I have a question : When one of the travelers knew the answer, did he say that out loud? @AtAn
    – Kevin L
    Sep 1 at 1:10










  • Yes. sorry, I thought that was explicit enough.
    – AtAn
    Sep 1 at 1:22






  • 2




    Yes he can immediately deduce. I think that's what OP means by "the order doesn't matter".
    – sedrick
    Sep 1 at 1:47













up vote
9
down vote

favorite
4









up vote
9
down vote

favorite
4






4





I think this is the most appropriate place to share this. I haven't figured out the answer yet, but I think I'm close. I couldn't find anything like this on the Internet, so I'm posting it here.



There are three travelers. They are inside a cave. Deep down in this cave, there are three doors, each door containing at least one diamond, and there are a total of 9 diamonds. Each traveler picks a door and gets the diamonds behind it.



The travelers loot their diamonds, and, before exiting the cave, all three must say simultaneously if they can deduce the number of diamonds that each of the other two have. They never lie, and all of them said they couldn't deduce it.



After these statements were said, one of the travelers realized that now he knows the answer.



So the question is:




How were the diamonds split between the three travelers? (the order doesn't matter)




I was going to write what I've managed to do so far, but I think it isn't a good idea to give away too much information even if its concealed by spoilers. This riddle was suggested by my discrete mathematics professor. It isn't homework and she didn't mention where it came from.










share|improve this question















I think this is the most appropriate place to share this. I haven't figured out the answer yet, but I think I'm close. I couldn't find anything like this on the Internet, so I'm posting it here.



There are three travelers. They are inside a cave. Deep down in this cave, there are three doors, each door containing at least one diamond, and there are a total of 9 diamonds. Each traveler picks a door and gets the diamonds behind it.



The travelers loot their diamonds, and, before exiting the cave, all three must say simultaneously if they can deduce the number of diamonds that each of the other two have. They never lie, and all of them said they couldn't deduce it.



After these statements were said, one of the travelers realized that now he knows the answer.



So the question is:




How were the diamonds split between the three travelers? (the order doesn't matter)




I was going to write what I've managed to do so far, but I think it isn't a good idea to give away too much information even if its concealed by spoilers. This riddle was suggested by my discrete mathematics professor. It isn't homework and she didn't mention where it came from.







logical-deduction






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Sep 7 at 0:34

























asked Sep 1 at 0:23









AtAn

495




495











  • Welcome to Puzzling.SE! May I ask where you found this riddle?
    – Riley
    Sep 1 at 0:28










  • Unfortunately I don't know either.
    – AtAn
    Sep 1 at 0:35










  • I have a question : When one of the travelers knew the answer, did he say that out loud? @AtAn
    – Kevin L
    Sep 1 at 1:10










  • Yes. sorry, I thought that was explicit enough.
    – AtAn
    Sep 1 at 1:22






  • 2




    Yes he can immediately deduce. I think that's what OP means by "the order doesn't matter".
    – sedrick
    Sep 1 at 1:47

















  • Welcome to Puzzling.SE! May I ask where you found this riddle?
    – Riley
    Sep 1 at 0:28










  • Unfortunately I don't know either.
    – AtAn
    Sep 1 at 0:35










  • I have a question : When one of the travelers knew the answer, did he say that out loud? @AtAn
    – Kevin L
    Sep 1 at 1:10










  • Yes. sorry, I thought that was explicit enough.
    – AtAn
    Sep 1 at 1:22






  • 2




    Yes he can immediately deduce. I think that's what OP means by "the order doesn't matter".
    – sedrick
    Sep 1 at 1:47
















Welcome to Puzzling.SE! May I ask where you found this riddle?
– Riley
Sep 1 at 0:28




Welcome to Puzzling.SE! May I ask where you found this riddle?
– Riley
Sep 1 at 0:28












Unfortunately I don't know either.
– AtAn
Sep 1 at 0:35




Unfortunately I don't know either.
– AtAn
Sep 1 at 0:35












I have a question : When one of the travelers knew the answer, did he say that out loud? @AtAn
– Kevin L
Sep 1 at 1:10




I have a question : When one of the travelers knew the answer, did he say that out loud? @AtAn
– Kevin L
Sep 1 at 1:10












Yes. sorry, I thought that was explicit enough.
– AtAn
Sep 1 at 1:22




Yes. sorry, I thought that was explicit enough.
– AtAn
Sep 1 at 1:22




2




2




Yes he can immediately deduce. I think that's what OP means by "the order doesn't matter".
– sedrick
Sep 1 at 1:47





Yes he can immediately deduce. I think that's what OP means by "the order doesn't matter".
– sedrick
Sep 1 at 1:47











7 Answers
7






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
10
down vote













I think it isn't possible and here is my reasoning.




First we know that nobody has 6 or 7 because they could immediately deduce the other two.


Now let's analyze this from the perspective of the traveler who figured it out. Here are the possibilities given the number he knows.


1: 35, 44

2: 25, 34

3: 15, 24, 33

4: 14, 23

5: 13, 22


The only way a traveler could figure out the quantities later is if there was only one combination but all possibilities have 2 or 3. Therefore I don't think it's possible.







share|improve this answer




















  • Note that you didn't discard the repeated ones (135 and 513, 144 and 414, etc). If you didn't because you're analyzing one's traveler outcome then it is fine, but at this point we don't get anything from it...
    – AtAn
    Sep 1 at 2:03


















up vote
4
down vote













Someone has shown why the puzzle does not seem to have a solution. however...




maybe your professor gave this puzzle to you in writing, and also has bad handwriting, and wrote an 8 which looked like a 9. which is not totally implausible. however I don't know whether they actually gave it to you in writing.




like with other analyses, we can rule out a few possibilites:




we know that no traveller can have 6, because they would deduce the others have 1 each, and also not 5, since then they would deduce the others have 1 and 2.

from here, every traveller has between 1 and 4 diamonds, and knows this of each other traveller, and nows the diamonds sum to 8

when a traveller has a number of diamonds, there are only a few possibilities for what the other travellers hold, due to the summing to 8.

I list the possibilities here



4: 13, 22

3: 23, 14

2: 24, 33

1: 34


1 only has 1 possibility for what the other travellers hold, which means that the solution was deduced by a traveller who looted 1 diamond







share|improve this answer



























    up vote
    3
    down vote













    Warning: Skewey logic ahead.



    First off:




    If you have 6 or 7 diamonds, you know that the combination is 1,1,7 or 1,2,6 right away.




    Now, since no one said that, it's clearly not true. However:




    The only time that this gives you new information is if you have either 1 or 2 diamonds




    This means:




    Anyone who looks interested in that fact has either 1 or 2 diamonds - but they still don't know how many the other people have




    This means that someone else has to make a guess:




    Now knowing that at least 1 person has either 1 or 2 diamonds:

    If they have 5 diamonds, then the combinations available are 1,3,5 with 1 interested person or 2,2,5 with 2 interested people

    If they have 4 diamonds, then the combinations available are 1,4,4 with 1 interested person, or 2,3,4 also with 1 interested person

    If they have 3 diamonds, then the combinations available are 1,3,5 with 1 interested person, or 2,3,4 also with 1 interested person

    If they have 2 diamonds, then the only combination available is 2,2,5 with 1 other interested person

    If they have 1 diamond, then no one else will show any interest - so we discount this option




    Since we know that someone must make a correct guess here, we know that




    The guesser does not have 1, 3, or 4 diamonds




    Meaning




    The combinations are 1,3,5 or 2,2,5




    Furthermore! We know that one person guesses, hence:




    The combination is 1,3,5, and the guesser is the person with 5 diamonds, because if the combination was 2,2,5 then everyone would be able to guess it at this point.







    share|improve this answer




















    • Your solution seems compelling, but I don't know what you mean by "interested person".
      – AtAn
      Sep 5 at 23:06






    • 1




      @AtAn There are 3 cases going into the first declaration: You know what the numbers are, you don't know what the numbers are, and you know that no one knows what the numbers are. After everyone says "I don't know", everyone in the second group moves to the third, and has to re-think based on that information - the new fact is of interest to them. Anyone already in the third group will not show any interest in the fact, as it was already known to them. (i.e. the 3rd spoiler)
      – Chronocidal
      Sep 6 at 2:52











    • how does someone determine that someone else is "interested" in the fact that no one has 6 or 7?
      – SilverCookies
      Sep 6 at 7:33










    • @SilverCookie Facial expressions / cold reading? If their reaction to finding out that no one knows how many diamonds they each have is to fall into deep thought, then they must not have already known/realised that that was going to be the case. (As other answers have pointed out, we need at least 1 more piece of info to answer the puzzle - I just tried to come up with one you could determine by observing the other )
      – Chronocidal
      Sep 6 at 7:41











    • @ ok I understand your point
      – SilverCookies
      Sep 6 at 8:14

















    up vote
    1
    down vote













    I think I may have the solution (I hope)



    I will write down all the possibilities first :




    117 126 135 144 153 162 171
    216 225 234 243 252 261
    315 324 333 342 351
    414 423 432 441
    513 522 531
    612 621
    711




    From this, I will only write the numbers that don't have similar numbers with different arrangements :




    333




    As you can see, this is the only possibility where the travelers will be able to know the number of diamonds because it is the only number with a unique arrangement






    share|improve this answer






















    • Can you explain why 3,3,3 is easier to figure out than 3,2,4?
      – Reibello
      Sep 1 at 1:25










    • @AtAn is this the answer u had in mind or am I completely off track :D ?
      – Kevin L
      Sep 1 at 1:25










    • @Reibello Well because 324 has other similar numbers with different arrangements (342, 423, 432)
      – Kevin L
      Sep 1 at 1:26







    • 1




      But how does the traveler know that?
      – Reibello
      Sep 1 at 1:28






    • 1




      Order doesn't matter I take to mean "126=162=216=261=612=621", so your argument doesn't hold. Also in say "144" the first traveller could possibly deduce the others' diamonds since there is no ordering in "44"
      – boboquack
      Sep 1 at 1:29


















    up vote
    1
    down vote













    If the one guy is a little slow then...




    The one person who knows received seven diamonds, and the other two each received one. I have no explanation for why the traveler with seven couldn't immediately figure this out. The one person who knows received six diamonds, and one other person received one, and another received two.







    share|improve this answer






















    • Well, that's not possible because they couldn't deduce the quantity at first right?
      – Kevin L
      Sep 1 at 1:16










    • Yeah, it seems unlikely that this is the answer a math professor is going for. I'm seeing if I can work something better out.
      – Reibello
      Sep 1 at 1:18










    • Yup, I just posted my answer (I think I may be wrong also) :)
      – Kevin L
      Sep 1 at 1:21










    • @Kevin L is right; they couldn't deduce.
      – AtAn
      Sep 1 at 1:24







    • 1




      Isn't this the same. They still couldn't deduce
      – Kevin L
      Sep 1 at 1:38

















    up vote
    1
    down vote













    The statements:



    • all three say simultaneously,


    so noone has any information before they call it. and




    • they couldn't deduce it.


    with their own diamond.




    moreover,



    • each door containing at least one diamond.

    so There are a few possibilities for their loots:




    | $1,1,7$ |, | $1,2,6$ |, | $1,3,5$ |, | $1,4,4$ |, | $2,2,5$ |, | $2,3,4$ |, |3,3,3|




    and out of these, we can easily eliminate some of them since noone could deduce the number of diamonds;




    | $1,1,7$ | -> If this was the case, whoever had 7 diamonds would figure out the number of diamonds for each person since at least one diamond per person and only 2 diamonds are left to be divided into two people.




    and after they said they could not




    "one of the travelers realized that he knew the answer". Actually he/she knew the answer but could not realize before they all call for it. So he didnt lie just he could deduce the number of the diamonds of others, but he realized it after they call for their deduction. Sometimes you know the answer, but you could not realize it before something happens.




    so the answer is actually




    | $1,1,7$ |







    share|improve this answer






















    • They all know there are 9 diamonds. If one picked up 7 diamonds, then there's only 2 left, 1 for each of the others. This way he would've said he could deduce, when exiting.
      – AtAn
      Sep 1 at 14:27











    • @AtAn I think u didnt read my explanation. you say "he realizes", not "then he knows" ... "one of the travelers realized that he knew the answer."
      – Oray
      Sep 1 at 14:28











    • Ok, I'm editing the post. I put it that way to make it less clear that the fact of none of them knowing the answer is crucial to the puzzle. He didn't knew the answer before saying.
      – AtAn
      Sep 1 at 14:32


















    up vote
    1
    down vote














    The traveller who realized the answer did 9 minus the sum of the two numbers other traveller said. You know your quantity, you know how many the other is missing, so you can figure out the third one (if you didn't pay attention to what he said). That's how he knew the answer. Otherwise you can't know the specific combination. You can only know the answer after the statements are made.




    EDIT:
    Fixed spoiler






    share|improve this answer


















    • 1




      You don't know the quantities involved. That's what you're trying to figure out.
      – AtAn
      Sep 4 at 23:44










    • What do you mean? Don't they know there are 9 diamonds in total?
      – Nicolás Magno
      Sep 4 at 23:45










    • Yes. But you gotta find how many diamonds each traveler has.
      – AtAn
      Sep 5 at 0:15










    • I know. I'm saying it's impossible unless someone takes a guess first.
      – Nicolás Magno
      Sep 5 at 0:16










    • Unless... rot13(Gurl nyy cvpx gur fnzr qbbe).
      – Nicolás Magno
      Sep 5 at 0:23










    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "559"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f71191%2f3-travelers-and-9-diamonds%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    7 Answers
    7






    active

    oldest

    votes








    7 Answers
    7






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    10
    down vote













    I think it isn't possible and here is my reasoning.




    First we know that nobody has 6 or 7 because they could immediately deduce the other two.


    Now let's analyze this from the perspective of the traveler who figured it out. Here are the possibilities given the number he knows.


    1: 35, 44

    2: 25, 34

    3: 15, 24, 33

    4: 14, 23

    5: 13, 22


    The only way a traveler could figure out the quantities later is if there was only one combination but all possibilities have 2 or 3. Therefore I don't think it's possible.







    share|improve this answer




















    • Note that you didn't discard the repeated ones (135 and 513, 144 and 414, etc). If you didn't because you're analyzing one's traveler outcome then it is fine, but at this point we don't get anything from it...
      – AtAn
      Sep 1 at 2:03















    up vote
    10
    down vote













    I think it isn't possible and here is my reasoning.




    First we know that nobody has 6 or 7 because they could immediately deduce the other two.


    Now let's analyze this from the perspective of the traveler who figured it out. Here are the possibilities given the number he knows.


    1: 35, 44

    2: 25, 34

    3: 15, 24, 33

    4: 14, 23

    5: 13, 22


    The only way a traveler could figure out the quantities later is if there was only one combination but all possibilities have 2 or 3. Therefore I don't think it's possible.







    share|improve this answer




















    • Note that you didn't discard the repeated ones (135 and 513, 144 and 414, etc). If you didn't because you're analyzing one's traveler outcome then it is fine, but at this point we don't get anything from it...
      – AtAn
      Sep 1 at 2:03













    up vote
    10
    down vote










    up vote
    10
    down vote









    I think it isn't possible and here is my reasoning.




    First we know that nobody has 6 or 7 because they could immediately deduce the other two.


    Now let's analyze this from the perspective of the traveler who figured it out. Here are the possibilities given the number he knows.


    1: 35, 44

    2: 25, 34

    3: 15, 24, 33

    4: 14, 23

    5: 13, 22


    The only way a traveler could figure out the quantities later is if there was only one combination but all possibilities have 2 or 3. Therefore I don't think it's possible.







    share|improve this answer












    I think it isn't possible and here is my reasoning.




    First we know that nobody has 6 or 7 because they could immediately deduce the other two.


    Now let's analyze this from the perspective of the traveler who figured it out. Here are the possibilities given the number he knows.


    1: 35, 44

    2: 25, 34

    3: 15, 24, 33

    4: 14, 23

    5: 13, 22


    The only way a traveler could figure out the quantities later is if there was only one combination but all possibilities have 2 or 3. Therefore I don't think it's possible.








    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Sep 1 at 2:01









    Bennett Bernardoni

    2,193516




    2,193516











    • Note that you didn't discard the repeated ones (135 and 513, 144 and 414, etc). If you didn't because you're analyzing one's traveler outcome then it is fine, but at this point we don't get anything from it...
      – AtAn
      Sep 1 at 2:03

















    • Note that you didn't discard the repeated ones (135 and 513, 144 and 414, etc). If you didn't because you're analyzing one's traveler outcome then it is fine, but at this point we don't get anything from it...
      – AtAn
      Sep 1 at 2:03
















    Note that you didn't discard the repeated ones (135 and 513, 144 and 414, etc). If you didn't because you're analyzing one's traveler outcome then it is fine, but at this point we don't get anything from it...
    – AtAn
    Sep 1 at 2:03





    Note that you didn't discard the repeated ones (135 and 513, 144 and 414, etc). If you didn't because you're analyzing one's traveler outcome then it is fine, but at this point we don't get anything from it...
    – AtAn
    Sep 1 at 2:03











    up vote
    4
    down vote













    Someone has shown why the puzzle does not seem to have a solution. however...




    maybe your professor gave this puzzle to you in writing, and also has bad handwriting, and wrote an 8 which looked like a 9. which is not totally implausible. however I don't know whether they actually gave it to you in writing.




    like with other analyses, we can rule out a few possibilites:




    we know that no traveller can have 6, because they would deduce the others have 1 each, and also not 5, since then they would deduce the others have 1 and 2.

    from here, every traveller has between 1 and 4 diamonds, and knows this of each other traveller, and nows the diamonds sum to 8

    when a traveller has a number of diamonds, there are only a few possibilities for what the other travellers hold, due to the summing to 8.

    I list the possibilities here



    4: 13, 22

    3: 23, 14

    2: 24, 33

    1: 34


    1 only has 1 possibility for what the other travellers hold, which means that the solution was deduced by a traveller who looted 1 diamond







    share|improve this answer
























      up vote
      4
      down vote













      Someone has shown why the puzzle does not seem to have a solution. however...




      maybe your professor gave this puzzle to you in writing, and also has bad handwriting, and wrote an 8 which looked like a 9. which is not totally implausible. however I don't know whether they actually gave it to you in writing.




      like with other analyses, we can rule out a few possibilites:




      we know that no traveller can have 6, because they would deduce the others have 1 each, and also not 5, since then they would deduce the others have 1 and 2.

      from here, every traveller has between 1 and 4 diamonds, and knows this of each other traveller, and nows the diamonds sum to 8

      when a traveller has a number of diamonds, there are only a few possibilities for what the other travellers hold, due to the summing to 8.

      I list the possibilities here



      4: 13, 22

      3: 23, 14

      2: 24, 33

      1: 34


      1 only has 1 possibility for what the other travellers hold, which means that the solution was deduced by a traveller who looted 1 diamond







      share|improve this answer






















        up vote
        4
        down vote










        up vote
        4
        down vote









        Someone has shown why the puzzle does not seem to have a solution. however...




        maybe your professor gave this puzzle to you in writing, and also has bad handwriting, and wrote an 8 which looked like a 9. which is not totally implausible. however I don't know whether they actually gave it to you in writing.




        like with other analyses, we can rule out a few possibilites:




        we know that no traveller can have 6, because they would deduce the others have 1 each, and also not 5, since then they would deduce the others have 1 and 2.

        from here, every traveller has between 1 and 4 diamonds, and knows this of each other traveller, and nows the diamonds sum to 8

        when a traveller has a number of diamonds, there are only a few possibilities for what the other travellers hold, due to the summing to 8.

        I list the possibilities here



        4: 13, 22

        3: 23, 14

        2: 24, 33

        1: 34


        1 only has 1 possibility for what the other travellers hold, which means that the solution was deduced by a traveller who looted 1 diamond







        share|improve this answer












        Someone has shown why the puzzle does not seem to have a solution. however...




        maybe your professor gave this puzzle to you in writing, and also has bad handwriting, and wrote an 8 which looked like a 9. which is not totally implausible. however I don't know whether they actually gave it to you in writing.




        like with other analyses, we can rule out a few possibilites:




        we know that no traveller can have 6, because they would deduce the others have 1 each, and also not 5, since then they would deduce the others have 1 and 2.

        from here, every traveller has between 1 and 4 diamonds, and knows this of each other traveller, and nows the diamonds sum to 8

        when a traveller has a number of diamonds, there are only a few possibilities for what the other travellers hold, due to the summing to 8.

        I list the possibilities here



        4: 13, 22

        3: 23, 14

        2: 24, 33

        1: 34


        1 only has 1 possibility for what the other travellers hold, which means that the solution was deduced by a traveller who looted 1 diamond








        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Sep 5 at 2:17









        Destructible Lemon

        1,757818




        1,757818




















            up vote
            3
            down vote













            Warning: Skewey logic ahead.



            First off:




            If you have 6 or 7 diamonds, you know that the combination is 1,1,7 or 1,2,6 right away.




            Now, since no one said that, it's clearly not true. However:




            The only time that this gives you new information is if you have either 1 or 2 diamonds




            This means:




            Anyone who looks interested in that fact has either 1 or 2 diamonds - but they still don't know how many the other people have




            This means that someone else has to make a guess:




            Now knowing that at least 1 person has either 1 or 2 diamonds:

            If they have 5 diamonds, then the combinations available are 1,3,5 with 1 interested person or 2,2,5 with 2 interested people

            If they have 4 diamonds, then the combinations available are 1,4,4 with 1 interested person, or 2,3,4 also with 1 interested person

            If they have 3 diamonds, then the combinations available are 1,3,5 with 1 interested person, or 2,3,4 also with 1 interested person

            If they have 2 diamonds, then the only combination available is 2,2,5 with 1 other interested person

            If they have 1 diamond, then no one else will show any interest - so we discount this option




            Since we know that someone must make a correct guess here, we know that




            The guesser does not have 1, 3, or 4 diamonds




            Meaning




            The combinations are 1,3,5 or 2,2,5




            Furthermore! We know that one person guesses, hence:




            The combination is 1,3,5, and the guesser is the person with 5 diamonds, because if the combination was 2,2,5 then everyone would be able to guess it at this point.







            share|improve this answer




















            • Your solution seems compelling, but I don't know what you mean by "interested person".
              – AtAn
              Sep 5 at 23:06






            • 1




              @AtAn There are 3 cases going into the first declaration: You know what the numbers are, you don't know what the numbers are, and you know that no one knows what the numbers are. After everyone says "I don't know", everyone in the second group moves to the third, and has to re-think based on that information - the new fact is of interest to them. Anyone already in the third group will not show any interest in the fact, as it was already known to them. (i.e. the 3rd spoiler)
              – Chronocidal
              Sep 6 at 2:52











            • how does someone determine that someone else is "interested" in the fact that no one has 6 or 7?
              – SilverCookies
              Sep 6 at 7:33










            • @SilverCookie Facial expressions / cold reading? If their reaction to finding out that no one knows how many diamonds they each have is to fall into deep thought, then they must not have already known/realised that that was going to be the case. (As other answers have pointed out, we need at least 1 more piece of info to answer the puzzle - I just tried to come up with one you could determine by observing the other )
              – Chronocidal
              Sep 6 at 7:41











            • @ ok I understand your point
              – SilverCookies
              Sep 6 at 8:14














            up vote
            3
            down vote













            Warning: Skewey logic ahead.



            First off:




            If you have 6 or 7 diamonds, you know that the combination is 1,1,7 or 1,2,6 right away.




            Now, since no one said that, it's clearly not true. However:




            The only time that this gives you new information is if you have either 1 or 2 diamonds




            This means:




            Anyone who looks interested in that fact has either 1 or 2 diamonds - but they still don't know how many the other people have




            This means that someone else has to make a guess:




            Now knowing that at least 1 person has either 1 or 2 diamonds:

            If they have 5 diamonds, then the combinations available are 1,3,5 with 1 interested person or 2,2,5 with 2 interested people

            If they have 4 diamonds, then the combinations available are 1,4,4 with 1 interested person, or 2,3,4 also with 1 interested person

            If they have 3 diamonds, then the combinations available are 1,3,5 with 1 interested person, or 2,3,4 also with 1 interested person

            If they have 2 diamonds, then the only combination available is 2,2,5 with 1 other interested person

            If they have 1 diamond, then no one else will show any interest - so we discount this option




            Since we know that someone must make a correct guess here, we know that




            The guesser does not have 1, 3, or 4 diamonds




            Meaning




            The combinations are 1,3,5 or 2,2,5




            Furthermore! We know that one person guesses, hence:




            The combination is 1,3,5, and the guesser is the person with 5 diamonds, because if the combination was 2,2,5 then everyone would be able to guess it at this point.







            share|improve this answer




















            • Your solution seems compelling, but I don't know what you mean by "interested person".
              – AtAn
              Sep 5 at 23:06






            • 1




              @AtAn There are 3 cases going into the first declaration: You know what the numbers are, you don't know what the numbers are, and you know that no one knows what the numbers are. After everyone says "I don't know", everyone in the second group moves to the third, and has to re-think based on that information - the new fact is of interest to them. Anyone already in the third group will not show any interest in the fact, as it was already known to them. (i.e. the 3rd spoiler)
              – Chronocidal
              Sep 6 at 2:52











            • how does someone determine that someone else is "interested" in the fact that no one has 6 or 7?
              – SilverCookies
              Sep 6 at 7:33










            • @SilverCookie Facial expressions / cold reading? If their reaction to finding out that no one knows how many diamonds they each have is to fall into deep thought, then they must not have already known/realised that that was going to be the case. (As other answers have pointed out, we need at least 1 more piece of info to answer the puzzle - I just tried to come up with one you could determine by observing the other )
              – Chronocidal
              Sep 6 at 7:41











            • @ ok I understand your point
              – SilverCookies
              Sep 6 at 8:14












            up vote
            3
            down vote










            up vote
            3
            down vote









            Warning: Skewey logic ahead.



            First off:




            If you have 6 or 7 diamonds, you know that the combination is 1,1,7 or 1,2,6 right away.




            Now, since no one said that, it's clearly not true. However:




            The only time that this gives you new information is if you have either 1 or 2 diamonds




            This means:




            Anyone who looks interested in that fact has either 1 or 2 diamonds - but they still don't know how many the other people have




            This means that someone else has to make a guess:




            Now knowing that at least 1 person has either 1 or 2 diamonds:

            If they have 5 diamonds, then the combinations available are 1,3,5 with 1 interested person or 2,2,5 with 2 interested people

            If they have 4 diamonds, then the combinations available are 1,4,4 with 1 interested person, or 2,3,4 also with 1 interested person

            If they have 3 diamonds, then the combinations available are 1,3,5 with 1 interested person, or 2,3,4 also with 1 interested person

            If they have 2 diamonds, then the only combination available is 2,2,5 with 1 other interested person

            If they have 1 diamond, then no one else will show any interest - so we discount this option




            Since we know that someone must make a correct guess here, we know that




            The guesser does not have 1, 3, or 4 diamonds




            Meaning




            The combinations are 1,3,5 or 2,2,5




            Furthermore! We know that one person guesses, hence:




            The combination is 1,3,5, and the guesser is the person with 5 diamonds, because if the combination was 2,2,5 then everyone would be able to guess it at this point.







            share|improve this answer












            Warning: Skewey logic ahead.



            First off:




            If you have 6 or 7 diamonds, you know that the combination is 1,1,7 or 1,2,6 right away.




            Now, since no one said that, it's clearly not true. However:




            The only time that this gives you new information is if you have either 1 or 2 diamonds




            This means:




            Anyone who looks interested in that fact has either 1 or 2 diamonds - but they still don't know how many the other people have




            This means that someone else has to make a guess:




            Now knowing that at least 1 person has either 1 or 2 diamonds:

            If they have 5 diamonds, then the combinations available are 1,3,5 with 1 interested person or 2,2,5 with 2 interested people

            If they have 4 diamonds, then the combinations available are 1,4,4 with 1 interested person, or 2,3,4 also with 1 interested person

            If they have 3 diamonds, then the combinations available are 1,3,5 with 1 interested person, or 2,3,4 also with 1 interested person

            If they have 2 diamonds, then the only combination available is 2,2,5 with 1 other interested person

            If they have 1 diamond, then no one else will show any interest - so we discount this option




            Since we know that someone must make a correct guess here, we know that




            The guesser does not have 1, 3, or 4 diamonds




            Meaning




            The combinations are 1,3,5 or 2,2,5




            Furthermore! We know that one person guesses, hence:




            The combination is 1,3,5, and the guesser is the person with 5 diamonds, because if the combination was 2,2,5 then everyone would be able to guess it at this point.








            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Sep 5 at 15:33









            Chronocidal

            602111




            602111











            • Your solution seems compelling, but I don't know what you mean by "interested person".
              – AtAn
              Sep 5 at 23:06






            • 1




              @AtAn There are 3 cases going into the first declaration: You know what the numbers are, you don't know what the numbers are, and you know that no one knows what the numbers are. After everyone says "I don't know", everyone in the second group moves to the third, and has to re-think based on that information - the new fact is of interest to them. Anyone already in the third group will not show any interest in the fact, as it was already known to them. (i.e. the 3rd spoiler)
              – Chronocidal
              Sep 6 at 2:52











            • how does someone determine that someone else is "interested" in the fact that no one has 6 or 7?
              – SilverCookies
              Sep 6 at 7:33










            • @SilverCookie Facial expressions / cold reading? If their reaction to finding out that no one knows how many diamonds they each have is to fall into deep thought, then they must not have already known/realised that that was going to be the case. (As other answers have pointed out, we need at least 1 more piece of info to answer the puzzle - I just tried to come up with one you could determine by observing the other )
              – Chronocidal
              Sep 6 at 7:41











            • @ ok I understand your point
              – SilverCookies
              Sep 6 at 8:14
















            • Your solution seems compelling, but I don't know what you mean by "interested person".
              – AtAn
              Sep 5 at 23:06






            • 1




              @AtAn There are 3 cases going into the first declaration: You know what the numbers are, you don't know what the numbers are, and you know that no one knows what the numbers are. After everyone says "I don't know", everyone in the second group moves to the third, and has to re-think based on that information - the new fact is of interest to them. Anyone already in the third group will not show any interest in the fact, as it was already known to them. (i.e. the 3rd spoiler)
              – Chronocidal
              Sep 6 at 2:52











            • how does someone determine that someone else is "interested" in the fact that no one has 6 or 7?
              – SilverCookies
              Sep 6 at 7:33










            • @SilverCookie Facial expressions / cold reading? If their reaction to finding out that no one knows how many diamonds they each have is to fall into deep thought, then they must not have already known/realised that that was going to be the case. (As other answers have pointed out, we need at least 1 more piece of info to answer the puzzle - I just tried to come up with one you could determine by observing the other )
              – Chronocidal
              Sep 6 at 7:41











            • @ ok I understand your point
              – SilverCookies
              Sep 6 at 8:14















            Your solution seems compelling, but I don't know what you mean by "interested person".
            – AtAn
            Sep 5 at 23:06




            Your solution seems compelling, but I don't know what you mean by "interested person".
            – AtAn
            Sep 5 at 23:06




            1




            1




            @AtAn There are 3 cases going into the first declaration: You know what the numbers are, you don't know what the numbers are, and you know that no one knows what the numbers are. After everyone says "I don't know", everyone in the second group moves to the third, and has to re-think based on that information - the new fact is of interest to them. Anyone already in the third group will not show any interest in the fact, as it was already known to them. (i.e. the 3rd spoiler)
            – Chronocidal
            Sep 6 at 2:52





            @AtAn There are 3 cases going into the first declaration: You know what the numbers are, you don't know what the numbers are, and you know that no one knows what the numbers are. After everyone says "I don't know", everyone in the second group moves to the third, and has to re-think based on that information - the new fact is of interest to them. Anyone already in the third group will not show any interest in the fact, as it was already known to them. (i.e. the 3rd spoiler)
            – Chronocidal
            Sep 6 at 2:52













            how does someone determine that someone else is "interested" in the fact that no one has 6 or 7?
            – SilverCookies
            Sep 6 at 7:33




            how does someone determine that someone else is "interested" in the fact that no one has 6 or 7?
            – SilverCookies
            Sep 6 at 7:33












            @SilverCookie Facial expressions / cold reading? If their reaction to finding out that no one knows how many diamonds they each have is to fall into deep thought, then they must not have already known/realised that that was going to be the case. (As other answers have pointed out, we need at least 1 more piece of info to answer the puzzle - I just tried to come up with one you could determine by observing the other )
            – Chronocidal
            Sep 6 at 7:41





            @SilverCookie Facial expressions / cold reading? If their reaction to finding out that no one knows how many diamonds they each have is to fall into deep thought, then they must not have already known/realised that that was going to be the case. (As other answers have pointed out, we need at least 1 more piece of info to answer the puzzle - I just tried to come up with one you could determine by observing the other )
            – Chronocidal
            Sep 6 at 7:41













            @ ok I understand your point
            – SilverCookies
            Sep 6 at 8:14




            @ ok I understand your point
            – SilverCookies
            Sep 6 at 8:14










            up vote
            1
            down vote













            I think I may have the solution (I hope)



            I will write down all the possibilities first :




            117 126 135 144 153 162 171
            216 225 234 243 252 261
            315 324 333 342 351
            414 423 432 441
            513 522 531
            612 621
            711




            From this, I will only write the numbers that don't have similar numbers with different arrangements :




            333




            As you can see, this is the only possibility where the travelers will be able to know the number of diamonds because it is the only number with a unique arrangement






            share|improve this answer






















            • Can you explain why 3,3,3 is easier to figure out than 3,2,4?
              – Reibello
              Sep 1 at 1:25










            • @AtAn is this the answer u had in mind or am I completely off track :D ?
              – Kevin L
              Sep 1 at 1:25










            • @Reibello Well because 324 has other similar numbers with different arrangements (342, 423, 432)
              – Kevin L
              Sep 1 at 1:26







            • 1




              But how does the traveler know that?
              – Reibello
              Sep 1 at 1:28






            • 1




              Order doesn't matter I take to mean "126=162=216=261=612=621", so your argument doesn't hold. Also in say "144" the first traveller could possibly deduce the others' diamonds since there is no ordering in "44"
              – boboquack
              Sep 1 at 1:29















            up vote
            1
            down vote













            I think I may have the solution (I hope)



            I will write down all the possibilities first :




            117 126 135 144 153 162 171
            216 225 234 243 252 261
            315 324 333 342 351
            414 423 432 441
            513 522 531
            612 621
            711




            From this, I will only write the numbers that don't have similar numbers with different arrangements :




            333




            As you can see, this is the only possibility where the travelers will be able to know the number of diamonds because it is the only number with a unique arrangement






            share|improve this answer






















            • Can you explain why 3,3,3 is easier to figure out than 3,2,4?
              – Reibello
              Sep 1 at 1:25










            • @AtAn is this the answer u had in mind or am I completely off track :D ?
              – Kevin L
              Sep 1 at 1:25










            • @Reibello Well because 324 has other similar numbers with different arrangements (342, 423, 432)
              – Kevin L
              Sep 1 at 1:26







            • 1




              But how does the traveler know that?
              – Reibello
              Sep 1 at 1:28






            • 1




              Order doesn't matter I take to mean "126=162=216=261=612=621", so your argument doesn't hold. Also in say "144" the first traveller could possibly deduce the others' diamonds since there is no ordering in "44"
              – boboquack
              Sep 1 at 1:29













            up vote
            1
            down vote










            up vote
            1
            down vote









            I think I may have the solution (I hope)



            I will write down all the possibilities first :




            117 126 135 144 153 162 171
            216 225 234 243 252 261
            315 324 333 342 351
            414 423 432 441
            513 522 531
            612 621
            711




            From this, I will only write the numbers that don't have similar numbers with different arrangements :




            333




            As you can see, this is the only possibility where the travelers will be able to know the number of diamonds because it is the only number with a unique arrangement






            share|improve this answer














            I think I may have the solution (I hope)



            I will write down all the possibilities first :




            117 126 135 144 153 162 171
            216 225 234 243 252 261
            315 324 333 342 351
            414 423 432 441
            513 522 531
            612 621
            711




            From this, I will only write the numbers that don't have similar numbers with different arrangements :




            333




            As you can see, this is the only possibility where the travelers will be able to know the number of diamonds because it is the only number with a unique arrangement







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Sep 1 at 1:30

























            answered Sep 1 at 1:21









            Kevin L

            1,549331




            1,549331











            • Can you explain why 3,3,3 is easier to figure out than 3,2,4?
              – Reibello
              Sep 1 at 1:25










            • @AtAn is this the answer u had in mind or am I completely off track :D ?
              – Kevin L
              Sep 1 at 1:25










            • @Reibello Well because 324 has other similar numbers with different arrangements (342, 423, 432)
              – Kevin L
              Sep 1 at 1:26







            • 1




              But how does the traveler know that?
              – Reibello
              Sep 1 at 1:28






            • 1




              Order doesn't matter I take to mean "126=162=216=261=612=621", so your argument doesn't hold. Also in say "144" the first traveller could possibly deduce the others' diamonds since there is no ordering in "44"
              – boboquack
              Sep 1 at 1:29

















            • Can you explain why 3,3,3 is easier to figure out than 3,2,4?
              – Reibello
              Sep 1 at 1:25










            • @AtAn is this the answer u had in mind or am I completely off track :D ?
              – Kevin L
              Sep 1 at 1:25










            • @Reibello Well because 324 has other similar numbers with different arrangements (342, 423, 432)
              – Kevin L
              Sep 1 at 1:26







            • 1




              But how does the traveler know that?
              – Reibello
              Sep 1 at 1:28






            • 1




              Order doesn't matter I take to mean "126=162=216=261=612=621", so your argument doesn't hold. Also in say "144" the first traveller could possibly deduce the others' diamonds since there is no ordering in "44"
              – boboquack
              Sep 1 at 1:29
















            Can you explain why 3,3,3 is easier to figure out than 3,2,4?
            – Reibello
            Sep 1 at 1:25




            Can you explain why 3,3,3 is easier to figure out than 3,2,4?
            – Reibello
            Sep 1 at 1:25












            @AtAn is this the answer u had in mind or am I completely off track :D ?
            – Kevin L
            Sep 1 at 1:25




            @AtAn is this the answer u had in mind or am I completely off track :D ?
            – Kevin L
            Sep 1 at 1:25












            @Reibello Well because 324 has other similar numbers with different arrangements (342, 423, 432)
            – Kevin L
            Sep 1 at 1:26





            @Reibello Well because 324 has other similar numbers with different arrangements (342, 423, 432)
            – Kevin L
            Sep 1 at 1:26





            1




            1




            But how does the traveler know that?
            – Reibello
            Sep 1 at 1:28




            But how does the traveler know that?
            – Reibello
            Sep 1 at 1:28




            1




            1




            Order doesn't matter I take to mean "126=162=216=261=612=621", so your argument doesn't hold. Also in say "144" the first traveller could possibly deduce the others' diamonds since there is no ordering in "44"
            – boboquack
            Sep 1 at 1:29





            Order doesn't matter I take to mean "126=162=216=261=612=621", so your argument doesn't hold. Also in say "144" the first traveller could possibly deduce the others' diamonds since there is no ordering in "44"
            – boboquack
            Sep 1 at 1:29











            up vote
            1
            down vote













            If the one guy is a little slow then...




            The one person who knows received seven diamonds, and the other two each received one. I have no explanation for why the traveler with seven couldn't immediately figure this out. The one person who knows received six diamonds, and one other person received one, and another received two.







            share|improve this answer






















            • Well, that's not possible because they couldn't deduce the quantity at first right?
              – Kevin L
              Sep 1 at 1:16










            • Yeah, it seems unlikely that this is the answer a math professor is going for. I'm seeing if I can work something better out.
              – Reibello
              Sep 1 at 1:18










            • Yup, I just posted my answer (I think I may be wrong also) :)
              – Kevin L
              Sep 1 at 1:21










            • @Kevin L is right; they couldn't deduce.
              – AtAn
              Sep 1 at 1:24







            • 1




              Isn't this the same. They still couldn't deduce
              – Kevin L
              Sep 1 at 1:38














            up vote
            1
            down vote













            If the one guy is a little slow then...




            The one person who knows received seven diamonds, and the other two each received one. I have no explanation for why the traveler with seven couldn't immediately figure this out. The one person who knows received six diamonds, and one other person received one, and another received two.







            share|improve this answer






















            • Well, that's not possible because they couldn't deduce the quantity at first right?
              – Kevin L
              Sep 1 at 1:16










            • Yeah, it seems unlikely that this is the answer a math professor is going for. I'm seeing if I can work something better out.
              – Reibello
              Sep 1 at 1:18










            • Yup, I just posted my answer (I think I may be wrong also) :)
              – Kevin L
              Sep 1 at 1:21










            • @Kevin L is right; they couldn't deduce.
              – AtAn
              Sep 1 at 1:24







            • 1




              Isn't this the same. They still couldn't deduce
              – Kevin L
              Sep 1 at 1:38












            up vote
            1
            down vote










            up vote
            1
            down vote









            If the one guy is a little slow then...




            The one person who knows received seven diamonds, and the other two each received one. I have no explanation for why the traveler with seven couldn't immediately figure this out. The one person who knows received six diamonds, and one other person received one, and another received two.







            share|improve this answer














            If the one guy is a little slow then...




            The one person who knows received seven diamonds, and the other two each received one. I have no explanation for why the traveler with seven couldn't immediately figure this out. The one person who knows received six diamonds, and one other person received one, and another received two.








            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Sep 1 at 1:31

























            answered Sep 1 at 1:09









            Reibello

            1,043419




            1,043419











            • Well, that's not possible because they couldn't deduce the quantity at first right?
              – Kevin L
              Sep 1 at 1:16










            • Yeah, it seems unlikely that this is the answer a math professor is going for. I'm seeing if I can work something better out.
              – Reibello
              Sep 1 at 1:18










            • Yup, I just posted my answer (I think I may be wrong also) :)
              – Kevin L
              Sep 1 at 1:21










            • @Kevin L is right; they couldn't deduce.
              – AtAn
              Sep 1 at 1:24







            • 1




              Isn't this the same. They still couldn't deduce
              – Kevin L
              Sep 1 at 1:38
















            • Well, that's not possible because they couldn't deduce the quantity at first right?
              – Kevin L
              Sep 1 at 1:16










            • Yeah, it seems unlikely that this is the answer a math professor is going for. I'm seeing if I can work something better out.
              – Reibello
              Sep 1 at 1:18










            • Yup, I just posted my answer (I think I may be wrong also) :)
              – Kevin L
              Sep 1 at 1:21










            • @Kevin L is right; they couldn't deduce.
              – AtAn
              Sep 1 at 1:24







            • 1




              Isn't this the same. They still couldn't deduce
              – Kevin L
              Sep 1 at 1:38















            Well, that's not possible because they couldn't deduce the quantity at first right?
            – Kevin L
            Sep 1 at 1:16




            Well, that's not possible because they couldn't deduce the quantity at first right?
            – Kevin L
            Sep 1 at 1:16












            Yeah, it seems unlikely that this is the answer a math professor is going for. I'm seeing if I can work something better out.
            – Reibello
            Sep 1 at 1:18




            Yeah, it seems unlikely that this is the answer a math professor is going for. I'm seeing if I can work something better out.
            – Reibello
            Sep 1 at 1:18












            Yup, I just posted my answer (I think I may be wrong also) :)
            – Kevin L
            Sep 1 at 1:21




            Yup, I just posted my answer (I think I may be wrong also) :)
            – Kevin L
            Sep 1 at 1:21












            @Kevin L is right; they couldn't deduce.
            – AtAn
            Sep 1 at 1:24





            @Kevin L is right; they couldn't deduce.
            – AtAn
            Sep 1 at 1:24





            1




            1




            Isn't this the same. They still couldn't deduce
            – Kevin L
            Sep 1 at 1:38




            Isn't this the same. They still couldn't deduce
            – Kevin L
            Sep 1 at 1:38










            up vote
            1
            down vote













            The statements:



            • all three say simultaneously,


            so noone has any information before they call it. and




            • they couldn't deduce it.


            with their own diamond.




            moreover,



            • each door containing at least one diamond.

            so There are a few possibilities for their loots:




            | $1,1,7$ |, | $1,2,6$ |, | $1,3,5$ |, | $1,4,4$ |, | $2,2,5$ |, | $2,3,4$ |, |3,3,3|




            and out of these, we can easily eliminate some of them since noone could deduce the number of diamonds;




            | $1,1,7$ | -> If this was the case, whoever had 7 diamonds would figure out the number of diamonds for each person since at least one diamond per person and only 2 diamonds are left to be divided into two people.




            and after they said they could not




            "one of the travelers realized that he knew the answer". Actually he/she knew the answer but could not realize before they all call for it. So he didnt lie just he could deduce the number of the diamonds of others, but he realized it after they call for their deduction. Sometimes you know the answer, but you could not realize it before something happens.




            so the answer is actually




            | $1,1,7$ |







            share|improve this answer






















            • They all know there are 9 diamonds. If one picked up 7 diamonds, then there's only 2 left, 1 for each of the others. This way he would've said he could deduce, when exiting.
              – AtAn
              Sep 1 at 14:27











            • @AtAn I think u didnt read my explanation. you say "he realizes", not "then he knows" ... "one of the travelers realized that he knew the answer."
              – Oray
              Sep 1 at 14:28











            • Ok, I'm editing the post. I put it that way to make it less clear that the fact of none of them knowing the answer is crucial to the puzzle. He didn't knew the answer before saying.
              – AtAn
              Sep 1 at 14:32















            up vote
            1
            down vote













            The statements:



            • all three say simultaneously,


            so noone has any information before they call it. and




            • they couldn't deduce it.


            with their own diamond.




            moreover,



            • each door containing at least one diamond.

            so There are a few possibilities for their loots:




            | $1,1,7$ |, | $1,2,6$ |, | $1,3,5$ |, | $1,4,4$ |, | $2,2,5$ |, | $2,3,4$ |, |3,3,3|




            and out of these, we can easily eliminate some of them since noone could deduce the number of diamonds;




            | $1,1,7$ | -> If this was the case, whoever had 7 diamonds would figure out the number of diamonds for each person since at least one diamond per person and only 2 diamonds are left to be divided into two people.




            and after they said they could not




            "one of the travelers realized that he knew the answer". Actually he/she knew the answer but could not realize before they all call for it. So he didnt lie just he could deduce the number of the diamonds of others, but he realized it after they call for their deduction. Sometimes you know the answer, but you could not realize it before something happens.




            so the answer is actually




            | $1,1,7$ |







            share|improve this answer






















            • They all know there are 9 diamonds. If one picked up 7 diamonds, then there's only 2 left, 1 for each of the others. This way he would've said he could deduce, when exiting.
              – AtAn
              Sep 1 at 14:27











            • @AtAn I think u didnt read my explanation. you say "he realizes", not "then he knows" ... "one of the travelers realized that he knew the answer."
              – Oray
              Sep 1 at 14:28











            • Ok, I'm editing the post. I put it that way to make it less clear that the fact of none of them knowing the answer is crucial to the puzzle. He didn't knew the answer before saying.
              – AtAn
              Sep 1 at 14:32













            up vote
            1
            down vote










            up vote
            1
            down vote









            The statements:



            • all three say simultaneously,


            so noone has any information before they call it. and




            • they couldn't deduce it.


            with their own diamond.




            moreover,



            • each door containing at least one diamond.

            so There are a few possibilities for their loots:




            | $1,1,7$ |, | $1,2,6$ |, | $1,3,5$ |, | $1,4,4$ |, | $2,2,5$ |, | $2,3,4$ |, |3,3,3|




            and out of these, we can easily eliminate some of them since noone could deduce the number of diamonds;




            | $1,1,7$ | -> If this was the case, whoever had 7 diamonds would figure out the number of diamonds for each person since at least one diamond per person and only 2 diamonds are left to be divided into two people.




            and after they said they could not




            "one of the travelers realized that he knew the answer". Actually he/she knew the answer but could not realize before they all call for it. So he didnt lie just he could deduce the number of the diamonds of others, but he realized it after they call for their deduction. Sometimes you know the answer, but you could not realize it before something happens.




            so the answer is actually




            | $1,1,7$ |







            share|improve this answer














            The statements:



            • all three say simultaneously,


            so noone has any information before they call it. and




            • they couldn't deduce it.


            with their own diamond.




            moreover,



            • each door containing at least one diamond.

            so There are a few possibilities for their loots:




            | $1,1,7$ |, | $1,2,6$ |, | $1,3,5$ |, | $1,4,4$ |, | $2,2,5$ |, | $2,3,4$ |, |3,3,3|




            and out of these, we can easily eliminate some of them since noone could deduce the number of diamonds;




            | $1,1,7$ | -> If this was the case, whoever had 7 diamonds would figure out the number of diamonds for each person since at least one diamond per person and only 2 diamonds are left to be divided into two people.




            and after they said they could not




            "one of the travelers realized that he knew the answer". Actually he/she knew the answer but could not realize before they all call for it. So he didnt lie just he could deduce the number of the diamonds of others, but he realized it after they call for their deduction. Sometimes you know the answer, but you could not realize it before something happens.




            so the answer is actually




            | $1,1,7$ |








            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Sep 1 at 14:04

























            answered Sep 1 at 13:41









            Oray

            14.2k435140




            14.2k435140











            • They all know there are 9 diamonds. If one picked up 7 diamonds, then there's only 2 left, 1 for each of the others. This way he would've said he could deduce, when exiting.
              – AtAn
              Sep 1 at 14:27











            • @AtAn I think u didnt read my explanation. you say "he realizes", not "then he knows" ... "one of the travelers realized that he knew the answer."
              – Oray
              Sep 1 at 14:28











            • Ok, I'm editing the post. I put it that way to make it less clear that the fact of none of them knowing the answer is crucial to the puzzle. He didn't knew the answer before saying.
              – AtAn
              Sep 1 at 14:32

















            • They all know there are 9 diamonds. If one picked up 7 diamonds, then there's only 2 left, 1 for each of the others. This way he would've said he could deduce, when exiting.
              – AtAn
              Sep 1 at 14:27











            • @AtAn I think u didnt read my explanation. you say "he realizes", not "then he knows" ... "one of the travelers realized that he knew the answer."
              – Oray
              Sep 1 at 14:28











            • Ok, I'm editing the post. I put it that way to make it less clear that the fact of none of them knowing the answer is crucial to the puzzle. He didn't knew the answer before saying.
              – AtAn
              Sep 1 at 14:32
















            They all know there are 9 diamonds. If one picked up 7 diamonds, then there's only 2 left, 1 for each of the others. This way he would've said he could deduce, when exiting.
            – AtAn
            Sep 1 at 14:27





            They all know there are 9 diamonds. If one picked up 7 diamonds, then there's only 2 left, 1 for each of the others. This way he would've said he could deduce, when exiting.
            – AtAn
            Sep 1 at 14:27













            @AtAn I think u didnt read my explanation. you say "he realizes", not "then he knows" ... "one of the travelers realized that he knew the answer."
            – Oray
            Sep 1 at 14:28





            @AtAn I think u didnt read my explanation. you say "he realizes", not "then he knows" ... "one of the travelers realized that he knew the answer."
            – Oray
            Sep 1 at 14:28













            Ok, I'm editing the post. I put it that way to make it less clear that the fact of none of them knowing the answer is crucial to the puzzle. He didn't knew the answer before saying.
            – AtAn
            Sep 1 at 14:32





            Ok, I'm editing the post. I put it that way to make it less clear that the fact of none of them knowing the answer is crucial to the puzzle. He didn't knew the answer before saying.
            – AtAn
            Sep 1 at 14:32











            up vote
            1
            down vote














            The traveller who realized the answer did 9 minus the sum of the two numbers other traveller said. You know your quantity, you know how many the other is missing, so you can figure out the third one (if you didn't pay attention to what he said). That's how he knew the answer. Otherwise you can't know the specific combination. You can only know the answer after the statements are made.




            EDIT:
            Fixed spoiler






            share|improve this answer


















            • 1




              You don't know the quantities involved. That's what you're trying to figure out.
              – AtAn
              Sep 4 at 23:44










            • What do you mean? Don't they know there are 9 diamonds in total?
              – Nicolás Magno
              Sep 4 at 23:45










            • Yes. But you gotta find how many diamonds each traveler has.
              – AtAn
              Sep 5 at 0:15










            • I know. I'm saying it's impossible unless someone takes a guess first.
              – Nicolás Magno
              Sep 5 at 0:16










            • Unless... rot13(Gurl nyy cvpx gur fnzr qbbe).
              – Nicolás Magno
              Sep 5 at 0:23














            up vote
            1
            down vote














            The traveller who realized the answer did 9 minus the sum of the two numbers other traveller said. You know your quantity, you know how many the other is missing, so you can figure out the third one (if you didn't pay attention to what he said). That's how he knew the answer. Otherwise you can't know the specific combination. You can only know the answer after the statements are made.




            EDIT:
            Fixed spoiler






            share|improve this answer


















            • 1




              You don't know the quantities involved. That's what you're trying to figure out.
              – AtAn
              Sep 4 at 23:44










            • What do you mean? Don't they know there are 9 diamonds in total?
              – Nicolás Magno
              Sep 4 at 23:45










            • Yes. But you gotta find how many diamonds each traveler has.
              – AtAn
              Sep 5 at 0:15










            • I know. I'm saying it's impossible unless someone takes a guess first.
              – Nicolás Magno
              Sep 5 at 0:16










            • Unless... rot13(Gurl nyy cvpx gur fnzr qbbe).
              – Nicolás Magno
              Sep 5 at 0:23












            up vote
            1
            down vote










            up vote
            1
            down vote










            The traveller who realized the answer did 9 minus the sum of the two numbers other traveller said. You know your quantity, you know how many the other is missing, so you can figure out the third one (if you didn't pay attention to what he said). That's how he knew the answer. Otherwise you can't know the specific combination. You can only know the answer after the statements are made.




            EDIT:
            Fixed spoiler






            share|improve this answer















            The traveller who realized the answer did 9 minus the sum of the two numbers other traveller said. You know your quantity, you know how many the other is missing, so you can figure out the third one (if you didn't pay attention to what he said). That's how he knew the answer. Otherwise you can't know the specific combination. You can only know the answer after the statements are made.




            EDIT:
            Fixed spoiler







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Sep 5 at 0:43

























            answered Sep 4 at 23:43









            Nicolás Magno

            4916




            4916







            • 1




              You don't know the quantities involved. That's what you're trying to figure out.
              – AtAn
              Sep 4 at 23:44










            • What do you mean? Don't they know there are 9 diamonds in total?
              – Nicolás Magno
              Sep 4 at 23:45










            • Yes. But you gotta find how many diamonds each traveler has.
              – AtAn
              Sep 5 at 0:15










            • I know. I'm saying it's impossible unless someone takes a guess first.
              – Nicolás Magno
              Sep 5 at 0:16










            • Unless... rot13(Gurl nyy cvpx gur fnzr qbbe).
              – Nicolás Magno
              Sep 5 at 0:23












            • 1




              You don't know the quantities involved. That's what you're trying to figure out.
              – AtAn
              Sep 4 at 23:44










            • What do you mean? Don't they know there are 9 diamonds in total?
              – Nicolás Magno
              Sep 4 at 23:45










            • Yes. But you gotta find how many diamonds each traveler has.
              – AtAn
              Sep 5 at 0:15










            • I know. I'm saying it's impossible unless someone takes a guess first.
              – Nicolás Magno
              Sep 5 at 0:16










            • Unless... rot13(Gurl nyy cvpx gur fnzr qbbe).
              – Nicolás Magno
              Sep 5 at 0:23







            1




            1




            You don't know the quantities involved. That's what you're trying to figure out.
            – AtAn
            Sep 4 at 23:44




            You don't know the quantities involved. That's what you're trying to figure out.
            – AtAn
            Sep 4 at 23:44












            What do you mean? Don't they know there are 9 diamonds in total?
            – Nicolás Magno
            Sep 4 at 23:45




            What do you mean? Don't they know there are 9 diamonds in total?
            – Nicolás Magno
            Sep 4 at 23:45












            Yes. But you gotta find how many diamonds each traveler has.
            – AtAn
            Sep 5 at 0:15




            Yes. But you gotta find how many diamonds each traveler has.
            – AtAn
            Sep 5 at 0:15












            I know. I'm saying it's impossible unless someone takes a guess first.
            – Nicolás Magno
            Sep 5 at 0:16




            I know. I'm saying it's impossible unless someone takes a guess first.
            – Nicolás Magno
            Sep 5 at 0:16












            Unless... rot13(Gurl nyy cvpx gur fnzr qbbe).
            – Nicolás Magno
            Sep 5 at 0:23




            Unless... rot13(Gurl nyy cvpx gur fnzr qbbe).
            – Nicolás Magno
            Sep 5 at 0:23

















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f71191%2f3-travelers-and-9-diamonds%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            這個網誌中的熱門文章

            How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

            Mutual Information Always Non-negative

            Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?