Find the limit of $lim _ nrightarrow infty sum _ k=1 ^ n frac sqrt n ^ 2 - k ^ 2 n ^ 2 $ [closed]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
-2
down vote

favorite
1












Need help to find the limit of $$lim _ nrightarrow infty sum _ k=1 ^ n frac sqrt n ^ 2 - k ^ 2 n ^ 2 $$










share|cite|improve this question















closed as off-topic by Jam, Henrik, Claude Leibovici, Nosrati, Martin R Sep 1 at 11:42


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Jam, Henrik, Claude Leibovici, Nosrati
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 6




    Hint: Riemann sum.
    – Gabriel Romon
    Sep 1 at 9:36






  • 3




    It's frowned upon to ask a question on this site without having shown your attempt at the problem. Update your post to include what you have tried.
    – Mattos
    Sep 1 at 9:39










  • Sry, new to the forum. Still have some difficulties with formula syntax.
    – Sm1
    Sep 1 at 9:45










  • read this math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…
    – Deepesh Meena
    Sep 1 at 9:46










  • @Sm1 No worries - the reluctance of users to answer questions with little effort shown is mostly to stop people using the site to do their homework for them. Just try to make sure when you ask a question to show what you've tried. Here's a guide for formatting equations math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…
    – Jam
    Sep 1 at 9:48














up vote
-2
down vote

favorite
1












Need help to find the limit of $$lim _ nrightarrow infty sum _ k=1 ^ n frac sqrt n ^ 2 - k ^ 2 n ^ 2 $$










share|cite|improve this question















closed as off-topic by Jam, Henrik, Claude Leibovici, Nosrati, Martin R Sep 1 at 11:42


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Jam, Henrik, Claude Leibovici, Nosrati
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 6




    Hint: Riemann sum.
    – Gabriel Romon
    Sep 1 at 9:36






  • 3




    It's frowned upon to ask a question on this site without having shown your attempt at the problem. Update your post to include what you have tried.
    – Mattos
    Sep 1 at 9:39










  • Sry, new to the forum. Still have some difficulties with formula syntax.
    – Sm1
    Sep 1 at 9:45










  • read this math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…
    – Deepesh Meena
    Sep 1 at 9:46










  • @Sm1 No worries - the reluctance of users to answer questions with little effort shown is mostly to stop people using the site to do their homework for them. Just try to make sure when you ask a question to show what you've tried. Here's a guide for formatting equations math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…
    – Jam
    Sep 1 at 9:48












up vote
-2
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
-2
down vote

favorite
1






1





Need help to find the limit of $$lim _ nrightarrow infty sum _ k=1 ^ n frac sqrt n ^ 2 - k ^ 2 n ^ 2 $$










share|cite|improve this question















Need help to find the limit of $$lim _ nrightarrow infty sum _ k=1 ^ n frac sqrt n ^ 2 - k ^ 2 n ^ 2 $$







calculus sequences-and-series limits






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Sep 1 at 9:38









Mattos

2,66321121




2,66321121










asked Sep 1 at 9:33









Sm1

91




91




closed as off-topic by Jam, Henrik, Claude Leibovici, Nosrati, Martin R Sep 1 at 11:42


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Jam, Henrik, Claude Leibovici, Nosrati
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




closed as off-topic by Jam, Henrik, Claude Leibovici, Nosrati, Martin R Sep 1 at 11:42


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Jam, Henrik, Claude Leibovici, Nosrati
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







  • 6




    Hint: Riemann sum.
    – Gabriel Romon
    Sep 1 at 9:36






  • 3




    It's frowned upon to ask a question on this site without having shown your attempt at the problem. Update your post to include what you have tried.
    – Mattos
    Sep 1 at 9:39










  • Sry, new to the forum. Still have some difficulties with formula syntax.
    – Sm1
    Sep 1 at 9:45










  • read this math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…
    – Deepesh Meena
    Sep 1 at 9:46










  • @Sm1 No worries - the reluctance of users to answer questions with little effort shown is mostly to stop people using the site to do their homework for them. Just try to make sure when you ask a question to show what you've tried. Here's a guide for formatting equations math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…
    – Jam
    Sep 1 at 9:48












  • 6




    Hint: Riemann sum.
    – Gabriel Romon
    Sep 1 at 9:36






  • 3




    It's frowned upon to ask a question on this site without having shown your attempt at the problem. Update your post to include what you have tried.
    – Mattos
    Sep 1 at 9:39










  • Sry, new to the forum. Still have some difficulties with formula syntax.
    – Sm1
    Sep 1 at 9:45










  • read this math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…
    – Deepesh Meena
    Sep 1 at 9:46










  • @Sm1 No worries - the reluctance of users to answer questions with little effort shown is mostly to stop people using the site to do their homework for them. Just try to make sure when you ask a question to show what you've tried. Here's a guide for formatting equations math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…
    – Jam
    Sep 1 at 9:48







6




6




Hint: Riemann sum.
– Gabriel Romon
Sep 1 at 9:36




Hint: Riemann sum.
– Gabriel Romon
Sep 1 at 9:36




3




3




It's frowned upon to ask a question on this site without having shown your attempt at the problem. Update your post to include what you have tried.
– Mattos
Sep 1 at 9:39




It's frowned upon to ask a question on this site without having shown your attempt at the problem. Update your post to include what you have tried.
– Mattos
Sep 1 at 9:39












Sry, new to the forum. Still have some difficulties with formula syntax.
– Sm1
Sep 1 at 9:45




Sry, new to the forum. Still have some difficulties with formula syntax.
– Sm1
Sep 1 at 9:45












read this math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…
– Deepesh Meena
Sep 1 at 9:46




read this math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…
– Deepesh Meena
Sep 1 at 9:46












@Sm1 No worries - the reluctance of users to answer questions with little effort shown is mostly to stop people using the site to do their homework for them. Just try to make sure when you ask a question to show what you've tried. Here's a guide for formatting equations math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…
– Jam
Sep 1 at 9:48




@Sm1 No worries - the reluctance of users to answer questions with little effort shown is mostly to stop people using the site to do their homework for them. Just try to make sure when you ask a question to show what you've tried. Here's a guide for formatting equations math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…
– Jam
Sep 1 at 9:48










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










Hint:

$$lim _ nrightarrow infty sum _ k=1 ^ n frac sqrt n ^ 2 - k ^ 2 n ^ 2 =lim_n to infty sum _ k=1 ^ n frac1nsqrt1-frack^2n^2$$



Replace $frac1n$ with $dx$ and $frackn$ with $x$



$$ lim _ nrightarrow infty sum _ k=1 ^ n frac1nsqrt1-frack^2n^2=int_0^1sqrt1-x^2dx$$



I obtained the bounds 0 and 1 using



$$int_a^bf(x),mathrmdx=lim_ntoinftysum_k^nfracb-anfleft(kfracb-anright)$$






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • I'd like to note that you can justify this with $int_a^bf(x),mathrmdx=lim_ntoinftysum_k^nfracb-anfleft(kfracb-anright)$ (hence where the bounds $0$ and $1$ come from)
    – Jam
    Sep 1 at 10:09











  • Yes that's what I did. dodo you want me to include this in the answer?
    – Deepesh Meena
    Sep 1 at 10:10










  • You could do - the reason I pointed it out is that the bounds seem to come out of nowhere
    – Jam
    Sep 1 at 10:11











  • But one could also found the bounds like this $frackn$ is replaced by x but k can go max up to n thus x can go up to 1 also k is minimum 1 thus minimum x is 1/n but $n to infty$ thus minimum x is 0
    – Deepesh Meena
    Sep 1 at 10:15

















up vote
0
down vote













As noticed by Riemann sum we obtain



$$lim _ nrightarrow infty sum _ k=1 ^ n frac1nsqrt1-frack^2n^2=int_0^1sqrt1-x^2dx=fracpi4$$



As an alternative, just to explore other ways, since for a fixed $k$ by binomial series we have



$$sqrt1-frack^2n^2=sum_j=0^infty binomfrac12jleft(-frack^2n^2right)^j $$



and therefore by Faulhaber's formula



$$sum _ k=1 ^ n frac1nsqrt1-frack^2n^2
=sum_j=0^infty left[binomfrac12jfrac(-1)^jn^2j+1sum_k=1^n k^2jright]
tosum_j=0^infty frac(-1)^jbinomfrac12j2j+1$$



and since for the binomial coefficient with $n=1/2$ we have



$$frac12choosej=2jchoosejfrac(-1)^j+12^2j(2j-1)implies binomfrac12jfrac(-1)^j2j+1=fracbinom2jj2^2j(1-4j^2)$$



we obtain that




$$sum_j=0^infty frac(-1)^jbinomfrac12j2j+1=sum_j=0^infty fracbinom2jj2^2j(1-4j^2)=fracpi4$$







share|cite|improve this answer






















  • How do you justify that last equality to $pi/4$?
    – Jam
    Sep 1 at 10:39










  • @Jam I have not anyidea about that! I'm assuming it is true from the result obtained by Riemann sum. I just wanted explore this other ways. Numerical extimation confirm the result. Do you have any idea how to derive the result in a different way without using Riemann sum?
    – gimusi
    Sep 1 at 10:42











  • If you format your links as [link name](link address), you can fit the whole URL in the link - otherwise I can't click on it.
    – Jam
    Sep 1 at 10:47










  • And I'm not sure about how to prove the equality to $pi/4$. I'd got as far as you but haven't thought of how to do the last step.
    – Jam
    Sep 1 at 10:47










  • @Jam sum 1
    – gimusi
    Sep 1 at 10:49


















2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
2
down vote



accepted










Hint:

$$lim _ nrightarrow infty sum _ k=1 ^ n frac sqrt n ^ 2 - k ^ 2 n ^ 2 =lim_n to infty sum _ k=1 ^ n frac1nsqrt1-frack^2n^2$$



Replace $frac1n$ with $dx$ and $frackn$ with $x$



$$ lim _ nrightarrow infty sum _ k=1 ^ n frac1nsqrt1-frack^2n^2=int_0^1sqrt1-x^2dx$$



I obtained the bounds 0 and 1 using



$$int_a^bf(x),mathrmdx=lim_ntoinftysum_k^nfracb-anfleft(kfracb-anright)$$






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • I'd like to note that you can justify this with $int_a^bf(x),mathrmdx=lim_ntoinftysum_k^nfracb-anfleft(kfracb-anright)$ (hence where the bounds $0$ and $1$ come from)
    – Jam
    Sep 1 at 10:09











  • Yes that's what I did. dodo you want me to include this in the answer?
    – Deepesh Meena
    Sep 1 at 10:10










  • You could do - the reason I pointed it out is that the bounds seem to come out of nowhere
    – Jam
    Sep 1 at 10:11











  • But one could also found the bounds like this $frackn$ is replaced by x but k can go max up to n thus x can go up to 1 also k is minimum 1 thus minimum x is 1/n but $n to infty$ thus minimum x is 0
    – Deepesh Meena
    Sep 1 at 10:15














up vote
2
down vote



accepted










Hint:

$$lim _ nrightarrow infty sum _ k=1 ^ n frac sqrt n ^ 2 - k ^ 2 n ^ 2 =lim_n to infty sum _ k=1 ^ n frac1nsqrt1-frack^2n^2$$



Replace $frac1n$ with $dx$ and $frackn$ with $x$



$$ lim _ nrightarrow infty sum _ k=1 ^ n frac1nsqrt1-frack^2n^2=int_0^1sqrt1-x^2dx$$



I obtained the bounds 0 and 1 using



$$int_a^bf(x),mathrmdx=lim_ntoinftysum_k^nfracb-anfleft(kfracb-anright)$$






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • I'd like to note that you can justify this with $int_a^bf(x),mathrmdx=lim_ntoinftysum_k^nfracb-anfleft(kfracb-anright)$ (hence where the bounds $0$ and $1$ come from)
    – Jam
    Sep 1 at 10:09











  • Yes that's what I did. dodo you want me to include this in the answer?
    – Deepesh Meena
    Sep 1 at 10:10










  • You could do - the reason I pointed it out is that the bounds seem to come out of nowhere
    – Jam
    Sep 1 at 10:11











  • But one could also found the bounds like this $frackn$ is replaced by x but k can go max up to n thus x can go up to 1 also k is minimum 1 thus minimum x is 1/n but $n to infty$ thus minimum x is 0
    – Deepesh Meena
    Sep 1 at 10:15












up vote
2
down vote



accepted







up vote
2
down vote



accepted






Hint:

$$lim _ nrightarrow infty sum _ k=1 ^ n frac sqrt n ^ 2 - k ^ 2 n ^ 2 =lim_n to infty sum _ k=1 ^ n frac1nsqrt1-frack^2n^2$$



Replace $frac1n$ with $dx$ and $frackn$ with $x$



$$ lim _ nrightarrow infty sum _ k=1 ^ n frac1nsqrt1-frack^2n^2=int_0^1sqrt1-x^2dx$$



I obtained the bounds 0 and 1 using



$$int_a^bf(x),mathrmdx=lim_ntoinftysum_k^nfracb-anfleft(kfracb-anright)$$






share|cite|improve this answer














Hint:

$$lim _ nrightarrow infty sum _ k=1 ^ n frac sqrt n ^ 2 - k ^ 2 n ^ 2 =lim_n to infty sum _ k=1 ^ n frac1nsqrt1-frack^2n^2$$



Replace $frac1n$ with $dx$ and $frackn$ with $x$



$$ lim _ nrightarrow infty sum _ k=1 ^ n frac1nsqrt1-frack^2n^2=int_0^1sqrt1-x^2dx$$



I obtained the bounds 0 and 1 using



$$int_a^bf(x),mathrmdx=lim_ntoinftysum_k^nfracb-anfleft(kfracb-anright)$$







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Sep 1 at 10:13

























answered Sep 1 at 9:56









Deepesh Meena

3,4982824




3,4982824











  • I'd like to note that you can justify this with $int_a^bf(x),mathrmdx=lim_ntoinftysum_k^nfracb-anfleft(kfracb-anright)$ (hence where the bounds $0$ and $1$ come from)
    – Jam
    Sep 1 at 10:09











  • Yes that's what I did. dodo you want me to include this in the answer?
    – Deepesh Meena
    Sep 1 at 10:10










  • You could do - the reason I pointed it out is that the bounds seem to come out of nowhere
    – Jam
    Sep 1 at 10:11











  • But one could also found the bounds like this $frackn$ is replaced by x but k can go max up to n thus x can go up to 1 also k is minimum 1 thus minimum x is 1/n but $n to infty$ thus minimum x is 0
    – Deepesh Meena
    Sep 1 at 10:15
















  • I'd like to note that you can justify this with $int_a^bf(x),mathrmdx=lim_ntoinftysum_k^nfracb-anfleft(kfracb-anright)$ (hence where the bounds $0$ and $1$ come from)
    – Jam
    Sep 1 at 10:09











  • Yes that's what I did. dodo you want me to include this in the answer?
    – Deepesh Meena
    Sep 1 at 10:10










  • You could do - the reason I pointed it out is that the bounds seem to come out of nowhere
    – Jam
    Sep 1 at 10:11











  • But one could also found the bounds like this $frackn$ is replaced by x but k can go max up to n thus x can go up to 1 also k is minimum 1 thus minimum x is 1/n but $n to infty$ thus minimum x is 0
    – Deepesh Meena
    Sep 1 at 10:15















I'd like to note that you can justify this with $int_a^bf(x),mathrmdx=lim_ntoinftysum_k^nfracb-anfleft(kfracb-anright)$ (hence where the bounds $0$ and $1$ come from)
– Jam
Sep 1 at 10:09





I'd like to note that you can justify this with $int_a^bf(x),mathrmdx=lim_ntoinftysum_k^nfracb-anfleft(kfracb-anright)$ (hence where the bounds $0$ and $1$ come from)
– Jam
Sep 1 at 10:09













Yes that's what I did. dodo you want me to include this in the answer?
– Deepesh Meena
Sep 1 at 10:10




Yes that's what I did. dodo you want me to include this in the answer?
– Deepesh Meena
Sep 1 at 10:10












You could do - the reason I pointed it out is that the bounds seem to come out of nowhere
– Jam
Sep 1 at 10:11





You could do - the reason I pointed it out is that the bounds seem to come out of nowhere
– Jam
Sep 1 at 10:11













But one could also found the bounds like this $frackn$ is replaced by x but k can go max up to n thus x can go up to 1 also k is minimum 1 thus minimum x is 1/n but $n to infty$ thus minimum x is 0
– Deepesh Meena
Sep 1 at 10:15




But one could also found the bounds like this $frackn$ is replaced by x but k can go max up to n thus x can go up to 1 also k is minimum 1 thus minimum x is 1/n but $n to infty$ thus minimum x is 0
– Deepesh Meena
Sep 1 at 10:15










up vote
0
down vote













As noticed by Riemann sum we obtain



$$lim _ nrightarrow infty sum _ k=1 ^ n frac1nsqrt1-frack^2n^2=int_0^1sqrt1-x^2dx=fracpi4$$



As an alternative, just to explore other ways, since for a fixed $k$ by binomial series we have



$$sqrt1-frack^2n^2=sum_j=0^infty binomfrac12jleft(-frack^2n^2right)^j $$



and therefore by Faulhaber's formula



$$sum _ k=1 ^ n frac1nsqrt1-frack^2n^2
=sum_j=0^infty left[binomfrac12jfrac(-1)^jn^2j+1sum_k=1^n k^2jright]
tosum_j=0^infty frac(-1)^jbinomfrac12j2j+1$$



and since for the binomial coefficient with $n=1/2$ we have



$$frac12choosej=2jchoosejfrac(-1)^j+12^2j(2j-1)implies binomfrac12jfrac(-1)^j2j+1=fracbinom2jj2^2j(1-4j^2)$$



we obtain that




$$sum_j=0^infty frac(-1)^jbinomfrac12j2j+1=sum_j=0^infty fracbinom2jj2^2j(1-4j^2)=fracpi4$$







share|cite|improve this answer






















  • How do you justify that last equality to $pi/4$?
    – Jam
    Sep 1 at 10:39










  • @Jam I have not anyidea about that! I'm assuming it is true from the result obtained by Riemann sum. I just wanted explore this other ways. Numerical extimation confirm the result. Do you have any idea how to derive the result in a different way without using Riemann sum?
    – gimusi
    Sep 1 at 10:42











  • If you format your links as [link name](link address), you can fit the whole URL in the link - otherwise I can't click on it.
    – Jam
    Sep 1 at 10:47










  • And I'm not sure about how to prove the equality to $pi/4$. I'd got as far as you but haven't thought of how to do the last step.
    – Jam
    Sep 1 at 10:47










  • @Jam sum 1
    – gimusi
    Sep 1 at 10:49















up vote
0
down vote













As noticed by Riemann sum we obtain



$$lim _ nrightarrow infty sum _ k=1 ^ n frac1nsqrt1-frack^2n^2=int_0^1sqrt1-x^2dx=fracpi4$$



As an alternative, just to explore other ways, since for a fixed $k$ by binomial series we have



$$sqrt1-frack^2n^2=sum_j=0^infty binomfrac12jleft(-frack^2n^2right)^j $$



and therefore by Faulhaber's formula



$$sum _ k=1 ^ n frac1nsqrt1-frack^2n^2
=sum_j=0^infty left[binomfrac12jfrac(-1)^jn^2j+1sum_k=1^n k^2jright]
tosum_j=0^infty frac(-1)^jbinomfrac12j2j+1$$



and since for the binomial coefficient with $n=1/2$ we have



$$frac12choosej=2jchoosejfrac(-1)^j+12^2j(2j-1)implies binomfrac12jfrac(-1)^j2j+1=fracbinom2jj2^2j(1-4j^2)$$



we obtain that




$$sum_j=0^infty frac(-1)^jbinomfrac12j2j+1=sum_j=0^infty fracbinom2jj2^2j(1-4j^2)=fracpi4$$







share|cite|improve this answer






















  • How do you justify that last equality to $pi/4$?
    – Jam
    Sep 1 at 10:39










  • @Jam I have not anyidea about that! I'm assuming it is true from the result obtained by Riemann sum. I just wanted explore this other ways. Numerical extimation confirm the result. Do you have any idea how to derive the result in a different way without using Riemann sum?
    – gimusi
    Sep 1 at 10:42











  • If you format your links as [link name](link address), you can fit the whole URL in the link - otherwise I can't click on it.
    – Jam
    Sep 1 at 10:47










  • And I'm not sure about how to prove the equality to $pi/4$. I'd got as far as you but haven't thought of how to do the last step.
    – Jam
    Sep 1 at 10:47










  • @Jam sum 1
    – gimusi
    Sep 1 at 10:49













up vote
0
down vote










up vote
0
down vote









As noticed by Riemann sum we obtain



$$lim _ nrightarrow infty sum _ k=1 ^ n frac1nsqrt1-frack^2n^2=int_0^1sqrt1-x^2dx=fracpi4$$



As an alternative, just to explore other ways, since for a fixed $k$ by binomial series we have



$$sqrt1-frack^2n^2=sum_j=0^infty binomfrac12jleft(-frack^2n^2right)^j $$



and therefore by Faulhaber's formula



$$sum _ k=1 ^ n frac1nsqrt1-frack^2n^2
=sum_j=0^infty left[binomfrac12jfrac(-1)^jn^2j+1sum_k=1^n k^2jright]
tosum_j=0^infty frac(-1)^jbinomfrac12j2j+1$$



and since for the binomial coefficient with $n=1/2$ we have



$$frac12choosej=2jchoosejfrac(-1)^j+12^2j(2j-1)implies binomfrac12jfrac(-1)^j2j+1=fracbinom2jj2^2j(1-4j^2)$$



we obtain that




$$sum_j=0^infty frac(-1)^jbinomfrac12j2j+1=sum_j=0^infty fracbinom2jj2^2j(1-4j^2)=fracpi4$$







share|cite|improve this answer














As noticed by Riemann sum we obtain



$$lim _ nrightarrow infty sum _ k=1 ^ n frac1nsqrt1-frack^2n^2=int_0^1sqrt1-x^2dx=fracpi4$$



As an alternative, just to explore other ways, since for a fixed $k$ by binomial series we have



$$sqrt1-frack^2n^2=sum_j=0^infty binomfrac12jleft(-frack^2n^2right)^j $$



and therefore by Faulhaber's formula



$$sum _ k=1 ^ n frac1nsqrt1-frack^2n^2
=sum_j=0^infty left[binomfrac12jfrac(-1)^jn^2j+1sum_k=1^n k^2jright]
tosum_j=0^infty frac(-1)^jbinomfrac12j2j+1$$



and since for the binomial coefficient with $n=1/2$ we have



$$frac12choosej=2jchoosejfrac(-1)^j+12^2j(2j-1)implies binomfrac12jfrac(-1)^j2j+1=fracbinom2jj2^2j(1-4j^2)$$



we obtain that




$$sum_j=0^infty frac(-1)^jbinomfrac12j2j+1=sum_j=0^infty fracbinom2jj2^2j(1-4j^2)=fracpi4$$








share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Sep 1 at 11:26

























answered Sep 1 at 10:31









gimusi

72k73888




72k73888











  • How do you justify that last equality to $pi/4$?
    – Jam
    Sep 1 at 10:39










  • @Jam I have not anyidea about that! I'm assuming it is true from the result obtained by Riemann sum. I just wanted explore this other ways. Numerical extimation confirm the result. Do you have any idea how to derive the result in a different way without using Riemann sum?
    – gimusi
    Sep 1 at 10:42











  • If you format your links as [link name](link address), you can fit the whole URL in the link - otherwise I can't click on it.
    – Jam
    Sep 1 at 10:47










  • And I'm not sure about how to prove the equality to $pi/4$. I'd got as far as you but haven't thought of how to do the last step.
    – Jam
    Sep 1 at 10:47










  • @Jam sum 1
    – gimusi
    Sep 1 at 10:49

















  • How do you justify that last equality to $pi/4$?
    – Jam
    Sep 1 at 10:39










  • @Jam I have not anyidea about that! I'm assuming it is true from the result obtained by Riemann sum. I just wanted explore this other ways. Numerical extimation confirm the result. Do you have any idea how to derive the result in a different way without using Riemann sum?
    – gimusi
    Sep 1 at 10:42











  • If you format your links as [link name](link address), you can fit the whole URL in the link - otherwise I can't click on it.
    – Jam
    Sep 1 at 10:47










  • And I'm not sure about how to prove the equality to $pi/4$. I'd got as far as you but haven't thought of how to do the last step.
    – Jam
    Sep 1 at 10:47










  • @Jam sum 1
    – gimusi
    Sep 1 at 10:49
















How do you justify that last equality to $pi/4$?
– Jam
Sep 1 at 10:39




How do you justify that last equality to $pi/4$?
– Jam
Sep 1 at 10:39












@Jam I have not anyidea about that! I'm assuming it is true from the result obtained by Riemann sum. I just wanted explore this other ways. Numerical extimation confirm the result. Do you have any idea how to derive the result in a different way without using Riemann sum?
– gimusi
Sep 1 at 10:42





@Jam I have not anyidea about that! I'm assuming it is true from the result obtained by Riemann sum. I just wanted explore this other ways. Numerical extimation confirm the result. Do you have any idea how to derive the result in a different way without using Riemann sum?
– gimusi
Sep 1 at 10:42













If you format your links as [link name](link address), you can fit the whole URL in the link - otherwise I can't click on it.
– Jam
Sep 1 at 10:47




If you format your links as [link name](link address), you can fit the whole URL in the link - otherwise I can't click on it.
– Jam
Sep 1 at 10:47












And I'm not sure about how to prove the equality to $pi/4$. I'd got as far as you but haven't thought of how to do the last step.
– Jam
Sep 1 at 10:47




And I'm not sure about how to prove the equality to $pi/4$. I'd got as far as you but haven't thought of how to do the last step.
– Jam
Sep 1 at 10:47












@Jam sum 1
– gimusi
Sep 1 at 10:49





@Jam sum 1
– gimusi
Sep 1 at 10:49



這個網誌中的熱門文章

How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

Mutual Information Always Non-negative

Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?