1,2,3,5,7,11,15,22,30,42,56,77,101,135,176,231,⦠(partition numbers): What is the recurrence relation / recursive formula / closed formula for this?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I have already read this:
Number partition - prove recursive formula
But the formula from the above link requires a parameter k
which is the required number of partitions, but I would like to partition it as far as it could. What I am finding is the partition number of a positive integer n
, where partition number means the number of different "partitions" of n. A partition of n
is an unordered list of positive integers less than or equals to n
, which add to up n
. Here are some examples:
1 = 1 # So T(1) = 1
2 = 2
= 1+1 # So T(2) = 2
3 = 3
= 2+1
= 1+1+1 # So T(3) = 3
4 = 4
= 3+1
= 2+2
= 2+1+1
= 1+1+1+1+1 # So T(4) = 5
5 = 5
= 4+1
= 3+2
= 3+1+1
= 2+2+1
= 2+1+1+1
= 1+1+1+1+1 # So T(5) = 7
I would like to find T(n)
for n >= 1
in terms of T(i)
where 1 <= i < n
(a recurrence relation), or better, in terms of n
(a closed formula). I would also like to get rid of $sum$s and $prod$s, if possible. (I guess it is not avoidable for a closed formula, so I ask for a recurrence one hoping to get rid of them)
Thanks in advance!
recurrence-relations integer-partitions
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I have already read this:
Number partition - prove recursive formula
But the formula from the above link requires a parameter k
which is the required number of partitions, but I would like to partition it as far as it could. What I am finding is the partition number of a positive integer n
, where partition number means the number of different "partitions" of n. A partition of n
is an unordered list of positive integers less than or equals to n
, which add to up n
. Here are some examples:
1 = 1 # So T(1) = 1
2 = 2
= 1+1 # So T(2) = 2
3 = 3
= 2+1
= 1+1+1 # So T(3) = 3
4 = 4
= 3+1
= 2+2
= 2+1+1
= 1+1+1+1+1 # So T(4) = 5
5 = 5
= 4+1
= 3+2
= 3+1+1
= 2+2+1
= 2+1+1+1
= 1+1+1+1+1 # So T(5) = 7
I would like to find T(n)
for n >= 1
in terms of T(i)
where 1 <= i < n
(a recurrence relation), or better, in terms of n
(a closed formula). I would also like to get rid of $sum$s and $prod$s, if possible. (I guess it is not avoidable for a closed formula, so I ask for a recurrence one hoping to get rid of them)
Thanks in advance!
recurrence-relations integer-partitions
Not quite a closed formula or a recurrence, but here is a nice generating function $sum_n=0^inftyT(n)x^n = Pi_n=1^inftyfrac11-x^n$
â Nate
Mar 16 '15 at 21:19
Have you already read through the Wikipedia, Wolfram Math World, and Math Overflow articles on the subject, or tried googling phrases likeexact formula partition
,Euler partition
,Rademacher partition
,Ramanujan partition
,Hardy partition
, etc. ?
â Lucian
Mar 17 '15 at 2:10
@Nate : My main reason for asking this question is to compute the value with a program, so it seems that infinite sum or product is not a choice for me. (And I'm not familiar with "generating function" too.) Thanks for your comment!
â Siu Ching Pong -Asuka Kenji-
Mar 17 '15 at 2:49
@Lucian : Thanks for your nice articles! I have read them before, now I re-read them, and still can't find my answer. I basically need a "generating function"-free, SIGMA-free, PI-free solution, if possible. This is because I need to implement it efficiently in a program. The closest solution I found from your articles may be the3(3k - 1) / 2
formula, but unfortunately it is an infinite sum (as far as I understand).
â Siu Ching Pong -Asuka Kenji-
Mar 17 '15 at 3:00
Ramanujan gave an exact formula for the partition function using an integral, but I bet that evaluating it is non-trivial.
â Lucian
Mar 17 '15 at 3:06
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I have already read this:
Number partition - prove recursive formula
But the formula from the above link requires a parameter k
which is the required number of partitions, but I would like to partition it as far as it could. What I am finding is the partition number of a positive integer n
, where partition number means the number of different "partitions" of n. A partition of n
is an unordered list of positive integers less than or equals to n
, which add to up n
. Here are some examples:
1 = 1 # So T(1) = 1
2 = 2
= 1+1 # So T(2) = 2
3 = 3
= 2+1
= 1+1+1 # So T(3) = 3
4 = 4
= 3+1
= 2+2
= 2+1+1
= 1+1+1+1+1 # So T(4) = 5
5 = 5
= 4+1
= 3+2
= 3+1+1
= 2+2+1
= 2+1+1+1
= 1+1+1+1+1 # So T(5) = 7
I would like to find T(n)
for n >= 1
in terms of T(i)
where 1 <= i < n
(a recurrence relation), or better, in terms of n
(a closed formula). I would also like to get rid of $sum$s and $prod$s, if possible. (I guess it is not avoidable for a closed formula, so I ask for a recurrence one hoping to get rid of them)
Thanks in advance!
recurrence-relations integer-partitions
I have already read this:
Number partition - prove recursive formula
But the formula from the above link requires a parameter k
which is the required number of partitions, but I would like to partition it as far as it could. What I am finding is the partition number of a positive integer n
, where partition number means the number of different "partitions" of n. A partition of n
is an unordered list of positive integers less than or equals to n
, which add to up n
. Here are some examples:
1 = 1 # So T(1) = 1
2 = 2
= 1+1 # So T(2) = 2
3 = 3
= 2+1
= 1+1+1 # So T(3) = 3
4 = 4
= 3+1
= 2+2
= 2+1+1
= 1+1+1+1+1 # So T(4) = 5
5 = 5
= 4+1
= 3+2
= 3+1+1
= 2+2+1
= 2+1+1+1
= 1+1+1+1+1 # So T(5) = 7
I would like to find T(n)
for n >= 1
in terms of T(i)
where 1 <= i < n
(a recurrence relation), or better, in terms of n
(a closed formula). I would also like to get rid of $sum$s and $prod$s, if possible. (I guess it is not avoidable for a closed formula, so I ask for a recurrence one hoping to get rid of them)
Thanks in advance!
recurrence-relations integer-partitions
edited Jul 13 at 0:16
asked Mar 16 '15 at 20:37
Siu Ching Pong -Asuka Kenji-
12616
12616
Not quite a closed formula or a recurrence, but here is a nice generating function $sum_n=0^inftyT(n)x^n = Pi_n=1^inftyfrac11-x^n$
â Nate
Mar 16 '15 at 21:19
Have you already read through the Wikipedia, Wolfram Math World, and Math Overflow articles on the subject, or tried googling phrases likeexact formula partition
,Euler partition
,Rademacher partition
,Ramanujan partition
,Hardy partition
, etc. ?
â Lucian
Mar 17 '15 at 2:10
@Nate : My main reason for asking this question is to compute the value with a program, so it seems that infinite sum or product is not a choice for me. (And I'm not familiar with "generating function" too.) Thanks for your comment!
â Siu Ching Pong -Asuka Kenji-
Mar 17 '15 at 2:49
@Lucian : Thanks for your nice articles! I have read them before, now I re-read them, and still can't find my answer. I basically need a "generating function"-free, SIGMA-free, PI-free solution, if possible. This is because I need to implement it efficiently in a program. The closest solution I found from your articles may be the3(3k - 1) / 2
formula, but unfortunately it is an infinite sum (as far as I understand).
â Siu Ching Pong -Asuka Kenji-
Mar 17 '15 at 3:00
Ramanujan gave an exact formula for the partition function using an integral, but I bet that evaluating it is non-trivial.
â Lucian
Mar 17 '15 at 3:06
add a comment |Â
Not quite a closed formula or a recurrence, but here is a nice generating function $sum_n=0^inftyT(n)x^n = Pi_n=1^inftyfrac11-x^n$
â Nate
Mar 16 '15 at 21:19
Have you already read through the Wikipedia, Wolfram Math World, and Math Overflow articles on the subject, or tried googling phrases likeexact formula partition
,Euler partition
,Rademacher partition
,Ramanujan partition
,Hardy partition
, etc. ?
â Lucian
Mar 17 '15 at 2:10
@Nate : My main reason for asking this question is to compute the value with a program, so it seems that infinite sum or product is not a choice for me. (And I'm not familiar with "generating function" too.) Thanks for your comment!
â Siu Ching Pong -Asuka Kenji-
Mar 17 '15 at 2:49
@Lucian : Thanks for your nice articles! I have read them before, now I re-read them, and still can't find my answer. I basically need a "generating function"-free, SIGMA-free, PI-free solution, if possible. This is because I need to implement it efficiently in a program. The closest solution I found from your articles may be the3(3k - 1) / 2
formula, but unfortunately it is an infinite sum (as far as I understand).
â Siu Ching Pong -Asuka Kenji-
Mar 17 '15 at 3:00
Ramanujan gave an exact formula for the partition function using an integral, but I bet that evaluating it is non-trivial.
â Lucian
Mar 17 '15 at 3:06
Not quite a closed formula or a recurrence, but here is a nice generating function $sum_n=0^inftyT(n)x^n = Pi_n=1^inftyfrac11-x^n$
â Nate
Mar 16 '15 at 21:19
Not quite a closed formula or a recurrence, but here is a nice generating function $sum_n=0^inftyT(n)x^n = Pi_n=1^inftyfrac11-x^n$
â Nate
Mar 16 '15 at 21:19
Have you already read through the Wikipedia, Wolfram Math World, and Math Overflow articles on the subject, or tried googling phrases like
exact formula partition
, Euler partition
, Rademacher partition
, Ramanujan partition
, Hardy partition
, etc. ?â Lucian
Mar 17 '15 at 2:10
Have you already read through the Wikipedia, Wolfram Math World, and Math Overflow articles on the subject, or tried googling phrases like
exact formula partition
, Euler partition
, Rademacher partition
, Ramanujan partition
, Hardy partition
, etc. ?â Lucian
Mar 17 '15 at 2:10
@Nate : My main reason for asking this question is to compute the value with a program, so it seems that infinite sum or product is not a choice for me. (And I'm not familiar with "generating function" too.) Thanks for your comment!
â Siu Ching Pong -Asuka Kenji-
Mar 17 '15 at 2:49
@Nate : My main reason for asking this question is to compute the value with a program, so it seems that infinite sum or product is not a choice for me. (And I'm not familiar with "generating function" too.) Thanks for your comment!
â Siu Ching Pong -Asuka Kenji-
Mar 17 '15 at 2:49
@Lucian : Thanks for your nice articles! I have read them before, now I re-read them, and still can't find my answer. I basically need a "generating function"-free, SIGMA-free, PI-free solution, if possible. This is because I need to implement it efficiently in a program. The closest solution I found from your articles may be the
3(3k - 1) / 2
formula, but unfortunately it is an infinite sum (as far as I understand).â Siu Ching Pong -Asuka Kenji-
Mar 17 '15 at 3:00
@Lucian : Thanks for your nice articles! I have read them before, now I re-read them, and still can't find my answer. I basically need a "generating function"-free, SIGMA-free, PI-free solution, if possible. This is because I need to implement it efficiently in a program. The closest solution I found from your articles may be the
3(3k - 1) / 2
formula, but unfortunately it is an infinite sum (as far as I understand).â Siu Ching Pong -Asuka Kenji-
Mar 17 '15 at 3:00
Ramanujan gave an exact formula for the partition function using an integral, but I bet that evaluating it is non-trivial.
â Lucian
Mar 17 '15 at 3:06
Ramanujan gave an exact formula for the partition function using an integral, but I bet that evaluating it is non-trivial.
â Lucian
Mar 17 '15 at 3:06
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
The recurrence relation you provided above is a solution to what you require. The extra $k$ parameter will need to be evaluated $n$ times.
Using this: $p(n, k) = p(n-1, k-1) + p(n-k, k)$
You need to solve : $p(n, 1) + p(n, 2) + ... + p(n, n)$
This page has a good explanation of the algorithm and also shows a table of the calculations.
http://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath091.htm
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
$T(0)=1$ and, for $ngt0,$
$$T(n)=T(n-1)+T(n-2)-T(n-2-3)-T(n-3-4)+T(n-3-4-5)+T(n-4-5-6)-T(n-4-5-6-7)-T(n-5-6-7-8)+cdots$$
$$=T(n-1)+T(n-2)-T(n-5)-T(n-7)+T(n-12)+T(n-15)-T(n-22)-T(n-26)+T(n-35)+T(n-40)-cdots$$
where it is understood that $T(n)=0$ when $nlt0.$
For example:
$$T(10)=T(9)+T(8)-T(5)-T(3)=30+22-7-3=42$$
$$T(11)=T(10)+T(9)-T(6)-T(4)=42+30-11-5=56$$
$$T(12)=T(11)+T(10)-T(7)-T(5)+T(0)=56+42-15-7+1=77$$
This is Euler's pentagonal numbers theorem. The sequence
$$1, 2, 5, 7, 12, 15, 22, 26, 35, 40, dots$$
is OEIS sequence A001318: Generalized pentagonal numbers; the $(2n-1)^textst$ term is
$$n+(n+1)+cdots+(2n-1)=fracn(3n-1)2$$
and the $(2n)^textth$ term is
$$(n+1)+(n+2)+cdots+(2n)=fracn(3n+1)2.$$
Please describe more about the numbers1
,2
,5
,7
,12
,15
,22
,26
,35
,40
, ... Are they form the same the sequence asA001318: Generalized pentagonal numbers (link)
?
â Siu Ching Pong -Asuka Kenji-
Mar 29 '16 at 12:25
@SiuChingPong-AsukaKenji- Thank you. I edited the OEIS reference into my answer.
â bof
Mar 29 '16 at 20:22
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
The recurrence relation you provided above is a solution to what you require. The extra $k$ parameter will need to be evaluated $n$ times.
Using this: $p(n, k) = p(n-1, k-1) + p(n-k, k)$
You need to solve : $p(n, 1) + p(n, 2) + ... + p(n, n)$
This page has a good explanation of the algorithm and also shows a table of the calculations.
http://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath091.htm
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
The recurrence relation you provided above is a solution to what you require. The extra $k$ parameter will need to be evaluated $n$ times.
Using this: $p(n, k) = p(n-1, k-1) + p(n-k, k)$
You need to solve : $p(n, 1) + p(n, 2) + ... + p(n, n)$
This page has a good explanation of the algorithm and also shows a table of the calculations.
http://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath091.htm
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
The recurrence relation you provided above is a solution to what you require. The extra $k$ parameter will need to be evaluated $n$ times.
Using this: $p(n, k) = p(n-1, k-1) + p(n-k, k)$
You need to solve : $p(n, 1) + p(n, 2) + ... + p(n, n)$
This page has a good explanation of the algorithm and also shows a table of the calculations.
http://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath091.htm
The recurrence relation you provided above is a solution to what you require. The extra $k$ parameter will need to be evaluated $n$ times.
Using this: $p(n, k) = p(n-1, k-1) + p(n-k, k)$
You need to solve : $p(n, 1) + p(n, 2) + ... + p(n, n)$
This page has a good explanation of the algorithm and also shows a table of the calculations.
http://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath091.htm
edited May 5 at 11:42
Kenta S
1,1741418
1,1741418
answered Jun 30 '15 at 13:44
chang weng
412
412
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
$T(0)=1$ and, for $ngt0,$
$$T(n)=T(n-1)+T(n-2)-T(n-2-3)-T(n-3-4)+T(n-3-4-5)+T(n-4-5-6)-T(n-4-5-6-7)-T(n-5-6-7-8)+cdots$$
$$=T(n-1)+T(n-2)-T(n-5)-T(n-7)+T(n-12)+T(n-15)-T(n-22)-T(n-26)+T(n-35)+T(n-40)-cdots$$
where it is understood that $T(n)=0$ when $nlt0.$
For example:
$$T(10)=T(9)+T(8)-T(5)-T(3)=30+22-7-3=42$$
$$T(11)=T(10)+T(9)-T(6)-T(4)=42+30-11-5=56$$
$$T(12)=T(11)+T(10)-T(7)-T(5)+T(0)=56+42-15-7+1=77$$
This is Euler's pentagonal numbers theorem. The sequence
$$1, 2, 5, 7, 12, 15, 22, 26, 35, 40, dots$$
is OEIS sequence A001318: Generalized pentagonal numbers; the $(2n-1)^textst$ term is
$$n+(n+1)+cdots+(2n-1)=fracn(3n-1)2$$
and the $(2n)^textth$ term is
$$(n+1)+(n+2)+cdots+(2n)=fracn(3n+1)2.$$
Please describe more about the numbers1
,2
,5
,7
,12
,15
,22
,26
,35
,40
, ... Are they form the same the sequence asA001318: Generalized pentagonal numbers (link)
?
â Siu Ching Pong -Asuka Kenji-
Mar 29 '16 at 12:25
@SiuChingPong-AsukaKenji- Thank you. I edited the OEIS reference into my answer.
â bof
Mar 29 '16 at 20:22
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
$T(0)=1$ and, for $ngt0,$
$$T(n)=T(n-1)+T(n-2)-T(n-2-3)-T(n-3-4)+T(n-3-4-5)+T(n-4-5-6)-T(n-4-5-6-7)-T(n-5-6-7-8)+cdots$$
$$=T(n-1)+T(n-2)-T(n-5)-T(n-7)+T(n-12)+T(n-15)-T(n-22)-T(n-26)+T(n-35)+T(n-40)-cdots$$
where it is understood that $T(n)=0$ when $nlt0.$
For example:
$$T(10)=T(9)+T(8)-T(5)-T(3)=30+22-7-3=42$$
$$T(11)=T(10)+T(9)-T(6)-T(4)=42+30-11-5=56$$
$$T(12)=T(11)+T(10)-T(7)-T(5)+T(0)=56+42-15-7+1=77$$
This is Euler's pentagonal numbers theorem. The sequence
$$1, 2, 5, 7, 12, 15, 22, 26, 35, 40, dots$$
is OEIS sequence A001318: Generalized pentagonal numbers; the $(2n-1)^textst$ term is
$$n+(n+1)+cdots+(2n-1)=fracn(3n-1)2$$
and the $(2n)^textth$ term is
$$(n+1)+(n+2)+cdots+(2n)=fracn(3n+1)2.$$
Please describe more about the numbers1
,2
,5
,7
,12
,15
,22
,26
,35
,40
, ... Are they form the same the sequence asA001318: Generalized pentagonal numbers (link)
?
â Siu Ching Pong -Asuka Kenji-
Mar 29 '16 at 12:25
@SiuChingPong-AsukaKenji- Thank you. I edited the OEIS reference into my answer.
â bof
Mar 29 '16 at 20:22
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
$T(0)=1$ and, for $ngt0,$
$$T(n)=T(n-1)+T(n-2)-T(n-2-3)-T(n-3-4)+T(n-3-4-5)+T(n-4-5-6)-T(n-4-5-6-7)-T(n-5-6-7-8)+cdots$$
$$=T(n-1)+T(n-2)-T(n-5)-T(n-7)+T(n-12)+T(n-15)-T(n-22)-T(n-26)+T(n-35)+T(n-40)-cdots$$
where it is understood that $T(n)=0$ when $nlt0.$
For example:
$$T(10)=T(9)+T(8)-T(5)-T(3)=30+22-7-3=42$$
$$T(11)=T(10)+T(9)-T(6)-T(4)=42+30-11-5=56$$
$$T(12)=T(11)+T(10)-T(7)-T(5)+T(0)=56+42-15-7+1=77$$
This is Euler's pentagonal numbers theorem. The sequence
$$1, 2, 5, 7, 12, 15, 22, 26, 35, 40, dots$$
is OEIS sequence A001318: Generalized pentagonal numbers; the $(2n-1)^textst$ term is
$$n+(n+1)+cdots+(2n-1)=fracn(3n-1)2$$
and the $(2n)^textth$ term is
$$(n+1)+(n+2)+cdots+(2n)=fracn(3n+1)2.$$
$T(0)=1$ and, for $ngt0,$
$$T(n)=T(n-1)+T(n-2)-T(n-2-3)-T(n-3-4)+T(n-3-4-5)+T(n-4-5-6)-T(n-4-5-6-7)-T(n-5-6-7-8)+cdots$$
$$=T(n-1)+T(n-2)-T(n-5)-T(n-7)+T(n-12)+T(n-15)-T(n-22)-T(n-26)+T(n-35)+T(n-40)-cdots$$
where it is understood that $T(n)=0$ when $nlt0.$
For example:
$$T(10)=T(9)+T(8)-T(5)-T(3)=30+22-7-3=42$$
$$T(11)=T(10)+T(9)-T(6)-T(4)=42+30-11-5=56$$
$$T(12)=T(11)+T(10)-T(7)-T(5)+T(0)=56+42-15-7+1=77$$
This is Euler's pentagonal numbers theorem. The sequence
$$1, 2, 5, 7, 12, 15, 22, 26, 35, 40, dots$$
is OEIS sequence A001318: Generalized pentagonal numbers; the $(2n-1)^textst$ term is
$$n+(n+1)+cdots+(2n-1)=fracn(3n-1)2$$
and the $(2n)^textth$ term is
$$(n+1)+(n+2)+cdots+(2n)=fracn(3n+1)2.$$
edited Aug 26 at 9:25
answered Mar 29 '16 at 10:15
bof
46.6k349113
46.6k349113
Please describe more about the numbers1
,2
,5
,7
,12
,15
,22
,26
,35
,40
, ... Are they form the same the sequence asA001318: Generalized pentagonal numbers (link)
?
â Siu Ching Pong -Asuka Kenji-
Mar 29 '16 at 12:25
@SiuChingPong-AsukaKenji- Thank you. I edited the OEIS reference into my answer.
â bof
Mar 29 '16 at 20:22
add a comment |Â
Please describe more about the numbers1
,2
,5
,7
,12
,15
,22
,26
,35
,40
, ... Are they form the same the sequence asA001318: Generalized pentagonal numbers (link)
?
â Siu Ching Pong -Asuka Kenji-
Mar 29 '16 at 12:25
@SiuChingPong-AsukaKenji- Thank you. I edited the OEIS reference into my answer.
â bof
Mar 29 '16 at 20:22
Please describe more about the numbers
1
, 2
, 5
, 7
, 12
, 15
, 22
, 26
, 35
, 40
, ... Are they form the same the sequence as A001318: Generalized pentagonal numbers (link)
?â Siu Ching Pong -Asuka Kenji-
Mar 29 '16 at 12:25
Please describe more about the numbers
1
, 2
, 5
, 7
, 12
, 15
, 22
, 26
, 35
, 40
, ... Are they form the same the sequence as A001318: Generalized pentagonal numbers (link)
?â Siu Ching Pong -Asuka Kenji-
Mar 29 '16 at 12:25
@SiuChingPong-AsukaKenji- Thank you. I edited the OEIS reference into my answer.
â bof
Mar 29 '16 at 20:22
@SiuChingPong-AsukaKenji- Thank you. I edited the OEIS reference into my answer.
â bof
Mar 29 '16 at 20:22
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1192906%2f1-2-3-5-7-11-15-22-30-42-56-77-101-135-176-231-partition-numbers-what-is%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Not quite a closed formula or a recurrence, but here is a nice generating function $sum_n=0^inftyT(n)x^n = Pi_n=1^inftyfrac11-x^n$
â Nate
Mar 16 '15 at 21:19
Have you already read through the Wikipedia, Wolfram Math World, and Math Overflow articles on the subject, or tried googling phrases like
exact formula partition
,Euler partition
,Rademacher partition
,Ramanujan partition
,Hardy partition
, etc. ?â Lucian
Mar 17 '15 at 2:10
@Nate : My main reason for asking this question is to compute the value with a program, so it seems that infinite sum or product is not a choice for me. (And I'm not familiar with "generating function" too.) Thanks for your comment!
â Siu Ching Pong -Asuka Kenji-
Mar 17 '15 at 2:49
@Lucian : Thanks for your nice articles! I have read them before, now I re-read them, and still can't find my answer. I basically need a "generating function"-free, SIGMA-free, PI-free solution, if possible. This is because I need to implement it efficiently in a program. The closest solution I found from your articles may be the
3(3k - 1) / 2
formula, but unfortunately it is an infinite sum (as far as I understand).â Siu Ching Pong -Asuka Kenji-
Mar 17 '15 at 3:00
Ramanujan gave an exact formula for the partition function using an integral, but I bet that evaluating it is non-trivial.
â Lucian
Mar 17 '15 at 3:06