When can $A$ an abelian group be made into a vector space over $BbbF_p$?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Let $BbbF_p$ be the finite field of integers modulo $p, p$ a prime, let $A$ be an abelian group. Precisely when can $A$ be made into a vector space over $BbbF_p$?
abstract-algebra group-theory finite-fields
 |Â
show 2 more comments
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Let $BbbF_p$ be the finite field of integers modulo $p, p$ a prime, let $A$ be an abelian group. Precisely when can $A$ be made into a vector space over $BbbF_p$?
abstract-algebra group-theory finite-fields
How much linear algebra do you know? Like, for example, can there be two non-isomorphic vector spaces of dimension $2$ over any given field? Or is your focus on the infinite-dimensional case?
â pjs36
Sep 21 '15 at 3:30
1
If dim(U) = dim(V), they're isomorphic, so no. I don't think this is referring to the infinite-dimensional case, although I guess that's not specified in the problem
â rakhil11
Sep 21 '15 at 3:36
1
Can you find a necessary condition? What needs to be checked then to make it a sufficient condition as well? Can you do the finitely generated case? Go step by step.
â guest
Sep 21 '15 at 3:41
2
@rakhil11 Given that comment, I would just think (in the finite-dimensional case) about all the vector spaces $V$ over $Bbb F_q$ you can think of, paying particular attention to the additive group $(V, +)$. Before trying to characterize everything, just characterize what you know.
â pjs36
Sep 21 '15 at 3:53
Taking pjs36's hint one step further. In $BbbF_p$ we have $0=1+1+cdots+1$ ($p$ summands on the right, all equal to $1$). What does this imply about the scalar multiplication (or addition) in $A$?
â Jyrki Lahtonen
Sep 21 '15 at 5:12
 |Â
show 2 more comments
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Let $BbbF_p$ be the finite field of integers modulo $p, p$ a prime, let $A$ be an abelian group. Precisely when can $A$ be made into a vector space over $BbbF_p$?
abstract-algebra group-theory finite-fields
Let $BbbF_p$ be the finite field of integers modulo $p, p$ a prime, let $A$ be an abelian group. Precisely when can $A$ be made into a vector space over $BbbF_p$?
abstract-algebra group-theory finite-fields
abstract-algebra group-theory finite-fields
asked Sep 21 '15 at 3:25
rakhil11
1439
1439
How much linear algebra do you know? Like, for example, can there be two non-isomorphic vector spaces of dimension $2$ over any given field? Or is your focus on the infinite-dimensional case?
â pjs36
Sep 21 '15 at 3:30
1
If dim(U) = dim(V), they're isomorphic, so no. I don't think this is referring to the infinite-dimensional case, although I guess that's not specified in the problem
â rakhil11
Sep 21 '15 at 3:36
1
Can you find a necessary condition? What needs to be checked then to make it a sufficient condition as well? Can you do the finitely generated case? Go step by step.
â guest
Sep 21 '15 at 3:41
2
@rakhil11 Given that comment, I would just think (in the finite-dimensional case) about all the vector spaces $V$ over $Bbb F_q$ you can think of, paying particular attention to the additive group $(V, +)$. Before trying to characterize everything, just characterize what you know.
â pjs36
Sep 21 '15 at 3:53
Taking pjs36's hint one step further. In $BbbF_p$ we have $0=1+1+cdots+1$ ($p$ summands on the right, all equal to $1$). What does this imply about the scalar multiplication (or addition) in $A$?
â Jyrki Lahtonen
Sep 21 '15 at 5:12
 |Â
show 2 more comments
How much linear algebra do you know? Like, for example, can there be two non-isomorphic vector spaces of dimension $2$ over any given field? Or is your focus on the infinite-dimensional case?
â pjs36
Sep 21 '15 at 3:30
1
If dim(U) = dim(V), they're isomorphic, so no. I don't think this is referring to the infinite-dimensional case, although I guess that's not specified in the problem
â rakhil11
Sep 21 '15 at 3:36
1
Can you find a necessary condition? What needs to be checked then to make it a sufficient condition as well? Can you do the finitely generated case? Go step by step.
â guest
Sep 21 '15 at 3:41
2
@rakhil11 Given that comment, I would just think (in the finite-dimensional case) about all the vector spaces $V$ over $Bbb F_q$ you can think of, paying particular attention to the additive group $(V, +)$. Before trying to characterize everything, just characterize what you know.
â pjs36
Sep 21 '15 at 3:53
Taking pjs36's hint one step further. In $BbbF_p$ we have $0=1+1+cdots+1$ ($p$ summands on the right, all equal to $1$). What does this imply about the scalar multiplication (or addition) in $A$?
â Jyrki Lahtonen
Sep 21 '15 at 5:12
How much linear algebra do you know? Like, for example, can there be two non-isomorphic vector spaces of dimension $2$ over any given field? Or is your focus on the infinite-dimensional case?
â pjs36
Sep 21 '15 at 3:30
How much linear algebra do you know? Like, for example, can there be two non-isomorphic vector spaces of dimension $2$ over any given field? Or is your focus on the infinite-dimensional case?
â pjs36
Sep 21 '15 at 3:30
1
1
If dim(U) = dim(V), they're isomorphic, so no. I don't think this is referring to the infinite-dimensional case, although I guess that's not specified in the problem
â rakhil11
Sep 21 '15 at 3:36
If dim(U) = dim(V), they're isomorphic, so no. I don't think this is referring to the infinite-dimensional case, although I guess that's not specified in the problem
â rakhil11
Sep 21 '15 at 3:36
1
1
Can you find a necessary condition? What needs to be checked then to make it a sufficient condition as well? Can you do the finitely generated case? Go step by step.
â guest
Sep 21 '15 at 3:41
Can you find a necessary condition? What needs to be checked then to make it a sufficient condition as well? Can you do the finitely generated case? Go step by step.
â guest
Sep 21 '15 at 3:41
2
2
@rakhil11 Given that comment, I would just think (in the finite-dimensional case) about all the vector spaces $V$ over $Bbb F_q$ you can think of, paying particular attention to the additive group $(V, +)$. Before trying to characterize everything, just characterize what you know.
â pjs36
Sep 21 '15 at 3:53
@rakhil11 Given that comment, I would just think (in the finite-dimensional case) about all the vector spaces $V$ over $Bbb F_q$ you can think of, paying particular attention to the additive group $(V, +)$. Before trying to characterize everything, just characterize what you know.
â pjs36
Sep 21 '15 at 3:53
Taking pjs36's hint one step further. In $BbbF_p$ we have $0=1+1+cdots+1$ ($p$ summands on the right, all equal to $1$). What does this imply about the scalar multiplication (or addition) in $A$?
â Jyrki Lahtonen
Sep 21 '15 at 5:12
Taking pjs36's hint one step further. In $BbbF_p$ we have $0=1+1+cdots+1$ ($p$ summands on the right, all equal to $1$). What does this imply about the scalar multiplication (or addition) in $A$?
â Jyrki Lahtonen
Sep 21 '15 at 5:12
 |Â
show 2 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
I'll try to give a full answer based on the comments
An abelian group $A$ is a $mathbbZ-$module and $ann_mathbbZA=(d)$ for some $dinmathbbZ$.
I'll show that $A$ is a $mathbbF_p$ vector space iff $(p)subset (d)Leftrightarrow d|pLeftrightarrow p=d$
- Let $ann_mathbbZ=(p)$. Then we can define a $dfracmathbbZpmathbbZ-$module structure as follows $$dfracmathbbZpmathbbZtimes Ato A$$
with $(z+pmathbbZ,x)mapsto zx$. This is well-defined : if $(z+pmathbbZ,x)=(z'+pmathbbZ,x')Rightarrow x=x',z-z'in pmathbbZRightarrow (z-z')x=0Rightarrow zx=z'x'.$ This way $A$ becomes a $mathbbF_p-$module (=$mathbbF_p$-vector space) - Let $A$ an $mathbbF_p-$vector space (=$dfracmathbbZpmathbbZ$-module). Then consider the ring homomorphism $$f:mathbbZto dfracmathbbZpmathbbZ$$ with $f(z)=[z]_p$. Then we can see $A$ as a $mathbbZ-$module with multiplication $$zcdot a=f(z)a,quad forall ain A,zin mathbbZ$$. Then $$zcdot a=0Leftrightarrow f(z)a=0Leftrightarrow f(z)=[0]_pLeftrightarrow p|z$$ hence $ann_mathbbZ=(p)$
Don't you mean $(p) = (d)$? (Which is equivalent to $d = pm p$.)
â Torsten Schoeneberg
Sep 6 at 14:58
Yes thanks, my omission for the $pm$. In fact since $(p)$ is maximal in $mathbbZ$ and $Mnot=0$, $(p)âÂÂ(d)âÂÂ(p)=(d)$
â giannispapav
Sep 7 at 12:49
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
I'll try to give a full answer based on the comments
An abelian group $A$ is a $mathbbZ-$module and $ann_mathbbZA=(d)$ for some $dinmathbbZ$.
I'll show that $A$ is a $mathbbF_p$ vector space iff $(p)subset (d)Leftrightarrow d|pLeftrightarrow p=d$
- Let $ann_mathbbZ=(p)$. Then we can define a $dfracmathbbZpmathbbZ-$module structure as follows $$dfracmathbbZpmathbbZtimes Ato A$$
with $(z+pmathbbZ,x)mapsto zx$. This is well-defined : if $(z+pmathbbZ,x)=(z'+pmathbbZ,x')Rightarrow x=x',z-z'in pmathbbZRightarrow (z-z')x=0Rightarrow zx=z'x'.$ This way $A$ becomes a $mathbbF_p-$module (=$mathbbF_p$-vector space) - Let $A$ an $mathbbF_p-$vector space (=$dfracmathbbZpmathbbZ$-module). Then consider the ring homomorphism $$f:mathbbZto dfracmathbbZpmathbbZ$$ with $f(z)=[z]_p$. Then we can see $A$ as a $mathbbZ-$module with multiplication $$zcdot a=f(z)a,quad forall ain A,zin mathbbZ$$. Then $$zcdot a=0Leftrightarrow f(z)a=0Leftrightarrow f(z)=[0]_pLeftrightarrow p|z$$ hence $ann_mathbbZ=(p)$
Don't you mean $(p) = (d)$? (Which is equivalent to $d = pm p$.)
â Torsten Schoeneberg
Sep 6 at 14:58
Yes thanks, my omission for the $pm$. In fact since $(p)$ is maximal in $mathbbZ$ and $Mnot=0$, $(p)âÂÂ(d)âÂÂ(p)=(d)$
â giannispapav
Sep 7 at 12:49
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
I'll try to give a full answer based on the comments
An abelian group $A$ is a $mathbbZ-$module and $ann_mathbbZA=(d)$ for some $dinmathbbZ$.
I'll show that $A$ is a $mathbbF_p$ vector space iff $(p)subset (d)Leftrightarrow d|pLeftrightarrow p=d$
- Let $ann_mathbbZ=(p)$. Then we can define a $dfracmathbbZpmathbbZ-$module structure as follows $$dfracmathbbZpmathbbZtimes Ato A$$
with $(z+pmathbbZ,x)mapsto zx$. This is well-defined : if $(z+pmathbbZ,x)=(z'+pmathbbZ,x')Rightarrow x=x',z-z'in pmathbbZRightarrow (z-z')x=0Rightarrow zx=z'x'.$ This way $A$ becomes a $mathbbF_p-$module (=$mathbbF_p$-vector space) - Let $A$ an $mathbbF_p-$vector space (=$dfracmathbbZpmathbbZ$-module). Then consider the ring homomorphism $$f:mathbbZto dfracmathbbZpmathbbZ$$ with $f(z)=[z]_p$. Then we can see $A$ as a $mathbbZ-$module with multiplication $$zcdot a=f(z)a,quad forall ain A,zin mathbbZ$$. Then $$zcdot a=0Leftrightarrow f(z)a=0Leftrightarrow f(z)=[0]_pLeftrightarrow p|z$$ hence $ann_mathbbZ=(p)$
Don't you mean $(p) = (d)$? (Which is equivalent to $d = pm p$.)
â Torsten Schoeneberg
Sep 6 at 14:58
Yes thanks, my omission for the $pm$. In fact since $(p)$ is maximal in $mathbbZ$ and $Mnot=0$, $(p)âÂÂ(d)âÂÂ(p)=(d)$
â giannispapav
Sep 7 at 12:49
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
I'll try to give a full answer based on the comments
An abelian group $A$ is a $mathbbZ-$module and $ann_mathbbZA=(d)$ for some $dinmathbbZ$.
I'll show that $A$ is a $mathbbF_p$ vector space iff $(p)subset (d)Leftrightarrow d|pLeftrightarrow p=d$
- Let $ann_mathbbZ=(p)$. Then we can define a $dfracmathbbZpmathbbZ-$module structure as follows $$dfracmathbbZpmathbbZtimes Ato A$$
with $(z+pmathbbZ,x)mapsto zx$. This is well-defined : if $(z+pmathbbZ,x)=(z'+pmathbbZ,x')Rightarrow x=x',z-z'in pmathbbZRightarrow (z-z')x=0Rightarrow zx=z'x'.$ This way $A$ becomes a $mathbbF_p-$module (=$mathbbF_p$-vector space) - Let $A$ an $mathbbF_p-$vector space (=$dfracmathbbZpmathbbZ$-module). Then consider the ring homomorphism $$f:mathbbZto dfracmathbbZpmathbbZ$$ with $f(z)=[z]_p$. Then we can see $A$ as a $mathbbZ-$module with multiplication $$zcdot a=f(z)a,quad forall ain A,zin mathbbZ$$. Then $$zcdot a=0Leftrightarrow f(z)a=0Leftrightarrow f(z)=[0]_pLeftrightarrow p|z$$ hence $ann_mathbbZ=(p)$
I'll try to give a full answer based on the comments
An abelian group $A$ is a $mathbbZ-$module and $ann_mathbbZA=(d)$ for some $dinmathbbZ$.
I'll show that $A$ is a $mathbbF_p$ vector space iff $(p)subset (d)Leftrightarrow d|pLeftrightarrow p=d$
- Let $ann_mathbbZ=(p)$. Then we can define a $dfracmathbbZpmathbbZ-$module structure as follows $$dfracmathbbZpmathbbZtimes Ato A$$
with $(z+pmathbbZ,x)mapsto zx$. This is well-defined : if $(z+pmathbbZ,x)=(z'+pmathbbZ,x')Rightarrow x=x',z-z'in pmathbbZRightarrow (z-z')x=0Rightarrow zx=z'x'.$ This way $A$ becomes a $mathbbF_p-$module (=$mathbbF_p$-vector space) - Let $A$ an $mathbbF_p-$vector space (=$dfracmathbbZpmathbbZ$-module). Then consider the ring homomorphism $$f:mathbbZto dfracmathbbZpmathbbZ$$ with $f(z)=[z]_p$. Then we can see $A$ as a $mathbbZ-$module with multiplication $$zcdot a=f(z)a,quad forall ain A,zin mathbbZ$$. Then $$zcdot a=0Leftrightarrow f(z)a=0Leftrightarrow f(z)=[0]_pLeftrightarrow p|z$$ hence $ann_mathbbZ=(p)$
answered Sep 6 at 7:56
giannispapav
1,340323
1,340323
Don't you mean $(p) = (d)$? (Which is equivalent to $d = pm p$.)
â Torsten Schoeneberg
Sep 6 at 14:58
Yes thanks, my omission for the $pm$. In fact since $(p)$ is maximal in $mathbbZ$ and $Mnot=0$, $(p)âÂÂ(d)âÂÂ(p)=(d)$
â giannispapav
Sep 7 at 12:49
add a comment |Â
Don't you mean $(p) = (d)$? (Which is equivalent to $d = pm p$.)
â Torsten Schoeneberg
Sep 6 at 14:58
Yes thanks, my omission for the $pm$. In fact since $(p)$ is maximal in $mathbbZ$ and $Mnot=0$, $(p)âÂÂ(d)âÂÂ(p)=(d)$
â giannispapav
Sep 7 at 12:49
Don't you mean $(p) = (d)$? (Which is equivalent to $d = pm p$.)
â Torsten Schoeneberg
Sep 6 at 14:58
Don't you mean $(p) = (d)$? (Which is equivalent to $d = pm p$.)
â Torsten Schoeneberg
Sep 6 at 14:58
Yes thanks, my omission for the $pm$. In fact since $(p)$ is maximal in $mathbbZ$ and $Mnot=0$, $(p)âÂÂ(d)âÂÂ(p)=(d)$
â giannispapav
Sep 7 at 12:49
Yes thanks, my omission for the $pm$. In fact since $(p)$ is maximal in $mathbbZ$ and $Mnot=0$, $(p)âÂÂ(d)âÂÂ(p)=(d)$
â giannispapav
Sep 7 at 12:49
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1444505%2fwhen-can-a-an-abelian-group-be-made-into-a-vector-space-over-bbbf-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
How much linear algebra do you know? Like, for example, can there be two non-isomorphic vector spaces of dimension $2$ over any given field? Or is your focus on the infinite-dimensional case?
â pjs36
Sep 21 '15 at 3:30
1
If dim(U) = dim(V), they're isomorphic, so no. I don't think this is referring to the infinite-dimensional case, although I guess that's not specified in the problem
â rakhil11
Sep 21 '15 at 3:36
1
Can you find a necessary condition? What needs to be checked then to make it a sufficient condition as well? Can you do the finitely generated case? Go step by step.
â guest
Sep 21 '15 at 3:41
2
@rakhil11 Given that comment, I would just think (in the finite-dimensional case) about all the vector spaces $V$ over $Bbb F_q$ you can think of, paying particular attention to the additive group $(V, +)$. Before trying to characterize everything, just characterize what you know.
â pjs36
Sep 21 '15 at 3:53
Taking pjs36's hint one step further. In $BbbF_p$ we have $0=1+1+cdots+1$ ($p$ summands on the right, all equal to $1$). What does this imply about the scalar multiplication (or addition) in $A$?
â Jyrki Lahtonen
Sep 21 '15 at 5:12