When can $A$ an abelian group be made into a vector space over $BbbF_p$?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1












Let $BbbF_p$ be the finite field of integers modulo $p, p$ a prime, let $A$ be an abelian group. Precisely when can $A$ be made into a vector space over $BbbF_p$?










share|cite|improve this question





















  • How much linear algebra do you know? Like, for example, can there be two non-isomorphic vector spaces of dimension $2$ over any given field? Or is your focus on the infinite-dimensional case?
    – pjs36
    Sep 21 '15 at 3:30






  • 1




    If dim(U) = dim(V), they're isomorphic, so no. I don't think this is referring to the infinite-dimensional case, although I guess that's not specified in the problem
    – rakhil11
    Sep 21 '15 at 3:36






  • 1




    Can you find a necessary condition? What needs to be checked then to make it a sufficient condition as well? Can you do the finitely generated case? Go step by step.
    – guest
    Sep 21 '15 at 3:41






  • 2




    @rakhil11 Given that comment, I would just think (in the finite-dimensional case) about all the vector spaces $V$ over $Bbb F_q$ you can think of, paying particular attention to the additive group $(V, +)$. Before trying to characterize everything, just characterize what you know.
    – pjs36
    Sep 21 '15 at 3:53










  • Taking pjs36's hint one step further. In $BbbF_p$ we have $0=1+1+cdots+1$ ($p$ summands on the right, all equal to $1$). What does this imply about the scalar multiplication (or addition) in $A$?
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Sep 21 '15 at 5:12














up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1












Let $BbbF_p$ be the finite field of integers modulo $p, p$ a prime, let $A$ be an abelian group. Precisely when can $A$ be made into a vector space over $BbbF_p$?










share|cite|improve this question





















  • How much linear algebra do you know? Like, for example, can there be two non-isomorphic vector spaces of dimension $2$ over any given field? Or is your focus on the infinite-dimensional case?
    – pjs36
    Sep 21 '15 at 3:30






  • 1




    If dim(U) = dim(V), they're isomorphic, so no. I don't think this is referring to the infinite-dimensional case, although I guess that's not specified in the problem
    – rakhil11
    Sep 21 '15 at 3:36






  • 1




    Can you find a necessary condition? What needs to be checked then to make it a sufficient condition as well? Can you do the finitely generated case? Go step by step.
    – guest
    Sep 21 '15 at 3:41






  • 2




    @rakhil11 Given that comment, I would just think (in the finite-dimensional case) about all the vector spaces $V$ over $Bbb F_q$ you can think of, paying particular attention to the additive group $(V, +)$. Before trying to characterize everything, just characterize what you know.
    – pjs36
    Sep 21 '15 at 3:53










  • Taking pjs36's hint one step further. In $BbbF_p$ we have $0=1+1+cdots+1$ ($p$ summands on the right, all equal to $1$). What does this imply about the scalar multiplication (or addition) in $A$?
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Sep 21 '15 at 5:12












up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1






1





Let $BbbF_p$ be the finite field of integers modulo $p, p$ a prime, let $A$ be an abelian group. Precisely when can $A$ be made into a vector space over $BbbF_p$?










share|cite|improve this question













Let $BbbF_p$ be the finite field of integers modulo $p, p$ a prime, let $A$ be an abelian group. Precisely when can $A$ be made into a vector space over $BbbF_p$?







abstract-algebra group-theory finite-fields






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Sep 21 '15 at 3:25









rakhil11

1439




1439











  • How much linear algebra do you know? Like, for example, can there be two non-isomorphic vector spaces of dimension $2$ over any given field? Or is your focus on the infinite-dimensional case?
    – pjs36
    Sep 21 '15 at 3:30






  • 1




    If dim(U) = dim(V), they're isomorphic, so no. I don't think this is referring to the infinite-dimensional case, although I guess that's not specified in the problem
    – rakhil11
    Sep 21 '15 at 3:36






  • 1




    Can you find a necessary condition? What needs to be checked then to make it a sufficient condition as well? Can you do the finitely generated case? Go step by step.
    – guest
    Sep 21 '15 at 3:41






  • 2




    @rakhil11 Given that comment, I would just think (in the finite-dimensional case) about all the vector spaces $V$ over $Bbb F_q$ you can think of, paying particular attention to the additive group $(V, +)$. Before trying to characterize everything, just characterize what you know.
    – pjs36
    Sep 21 '15 at 3:53










  • Taking pjs36's hint one step further. In $BbbF_p$ we have $0=1+1+cdots+1$ ($p$ summands on the right, all equal to $1$). What does this imply about the scalar multiplication (or addition) in $A$?
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Sep 21 '15 at 5:12
















  • How much linear algebra do you know? Like, for example, can there be two non-isomorphic vector spaces of dimension $2$ over any given field? Or is your focus on the infinite-dimensional case?
    – pjs36
    Sep 21 '15 at 3:30






  • 1




    If dim(U) = dim(V), they're isomorphic, so no. I don't think this is referring to the infinite-dimensional case, although I guess that's not specified in the problem
    – rakhil11
    Sep 21 '15 at 3:36






  • 1




    Can you find a necessary condition? What needs to be checked then to make it a sufficient condition as well? Can you do the finitely generated case? Go step by step.
    – guest
    Sep 21 '15 at 3:41






  • 2




    @rakhil11 Given that comment, I would just think (in the finite-dimensional case) about all the vector spaces $V$ over $Bbb F_q$ you can think of, paying particular attention to the additive group $(V, +)$. Before trying to characterize everything, just characterize what you know.
    – pjs36
    Sep 21 '15 at 3:53










  • Taking pjs36's hint one step further. In $BbbF_p$ we have $0=1+1+cdots+1$ ($p$ summands on the right, all equal to $1$). What does this imply about the scalar multiplication (or addition) in $A$?
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Sep 21 '15 at 5:12















How much linear algebra do you know? Like, for example, can there be two non-isomorphic vector spaces of dimension $2$ over any given field? Or is your focus on the infinite-dimensional case?
– pjs36
Sep 21 '15 at 3:30




How much linear algebra do you know? Like, for example, can there be two non-isomorphic vector spaces of dimension $2$ over any given field? Or is your focus on the infinite-dimensional case?
– pjs36
Sep 21 '15 at 3:30




1




1




If dim(U) = dim(V), they're isomorphic, so no. I don't think this is referring to the infinite-dimensional case, although I guess that's not specified in the problem
– rakhil11
Sep 21 '15 at 3:36




If dim(U) = dim(V), they're isomorphic, so no. I don't think this is referring to the infinite-dimensional case, although I guess that's not specified in the problem
– rakhil11
Sep 21 '15 at 3:36




1




1




Can you find a necessary condition? What needs to be checked then to make it a sufficient condition as well? Can you do the finitely generated case? Go step by step.
– guest
Sep 21 '15 at 3:41




Can you find a necessary condition? What needs to be checked then to make it a sufficient condition as well? Can you do the finitely generated case? Go step by step.
– guest
Sep 21 '15 at 3:41




2




2




@rakhil11 Given that comment, I would just think (in the finite-dimensional case) about all the vector spaces $V$ over $Bbb F_q$ you can think of, paying particular attention to the additive group $(V, +)$. Before trying to characterize everything, just characterize what you know.
– pjs36
Sep 21 '15 at 3:53




@rakhil11 Given that comment, I would just think (in the finite-dimensional case) about all the vector spaces $V$ over $Bbb F_q$ you can think of, paying particular attention to the additive group $(V, +)$. Before trying to characterize everything, just characterize what you know.
– pjs36
Sep 21 '15 at 3:53












Taking pjs36's hint one step further. In $BbbF_p$ we have $0=1+1+cdots+1$ ($p$ summands on the right, all equal to $1$). What does this imply about the scalar multiplication (or addition) in $A$?
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Sep 21 '15 at 5:12




Taking pjs36's hint one step further. In $BbbF_p$ we have $0=1+1+cdots+1$ ($p$ summands on the right, all equal to $1$). What does this imply about the scalar multiplication (or addition) in $A$?
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Sep 21 '15 at 5:12










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote













I'll try to give a full answer based on the comments



An abelian group $A$ is a $mathbbZ-$module and $ann_mathbbZA=(d)$ for some $dinmathbbZ$.



I'll show that $A$ is a $mathbbF_p$ vector space iff $(p)subset (d)Leftrightarrow d|pLeftrightarrow p=d$



  • Let $ann_mathbbZ=(p)$. Then we can define a $dfracmathbbZpmathbbZ-$module structure as follows $$dfracmathbbZpmathbbZtimes Ato A$$
    with $(z+pmathbbZ,x)mapsto zx$. This is well-defined : if $(z+pmathbbZ,x)=(z'+pmathbbZ,x')Rightarrow x=x',z-z'in pmathbbZRightarrow (z-z')x=0Rightarrow zx=z'x'.$ This way $A$ becomes a $mathbbF_p-$module (=$mathbbF_p$-vector space)

  • Let $A$ an $mathbbF_p-$vector space (=$dfracmathbbZpmathbbZ$-module). Then consider the ring homomorphism $$f:mathbbZto dfracmathbbZpmathbbZ$$ with $f(z)=[z]_p$. Then we can see $A$ as a $mathbbZ-$module with multiplication $$zcdot a=f(z)a,quad forall ain A,zin mathbbZ$$. Then $$zcdot a=0Leftrightarrow f(z)a=0Leftrightarrow f(z)=[0]_pLeftrightarrow p|z$$ hence $ann_mathbbZ=(p)$





share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Don't you mean $(p) = (d)$? (Which is equivalent to $d = pm p$.)
    – Torsten Schoeneberg
    Sep 6 at 14:58










  • Yes thanks, my omission for the $pm$. In fact since $(p)$ is maximal in $mathbbZ$ and $Mnot=0$, $(p)⊂(d)⇔(p)=(d)$
    – giannispapav
    Sep 7 at 12:49










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1444505%2fwhen-can-a-an-abelian-group-be-made-into-a-vector-space-over-bbbf-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
2
down vote













I'll try to give a full answer based on the comments



An abelian group $A$ is a $mathbbZ-$module and $ann_mathbbZA=(d)$ for some $dinmathbbZ$.



I'll show that $A$ is a $mathbbF_p$ vector space iff $(p)subset (d)Leftrightarrow d|pLeftrightarrow p=d$



  • Let $ann_mathbbZ=(p)$. Then we can define a $dfracmathbbZpmathbbZ-$module structure as follows $$dfracmathbbZpmathbbZtimes Ato A$$
    with $(z+pmathbbZ,x)mapsto zx$. This is well-defined : if $(z+pmathbbZ,x)=(z'+pmathbbZ,x')Rightarrow x=x',z-z'in pmathbbZRightarrow (z-z')x=0Rightarrow zx=z'x'.$ This way $A$ becomes a $mathbbF_p-$module (=$mathbbF_p$-vector space)

  • Let $A$ an $mathbbF_p-$vector space (=$dfracmathbbZpmathbbZ$-module). Then consider the ring homomorphism $$f:mathbbZto dfracmathbbZpmathbbZ$$ with $f(z)=[z]_p$. Then we can see $A$ as a $mathbbZ-$module with multiplication $$zcdot a=f(z)a,quad forall ain A,zin mathbbZ$$. Then $$zcdot a=0Leftrightarrow f(z)a=0Leftrightarrow f(z)=[0]_pLeftrightarrow p|z$$ hence $ann_mathbbZ=(p)$





share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Don't you mean $(p) = (d)$? (Which is equivalent to $d = pm p$.)
    – Torsten Schoeneberg
    Sep 6 at 14:58










  • Yes thanks, my omission for the $pm$. In fact since $(p)$ is maximal in $mathbbZ$ and $Mnot=0$, $(p)⊂(d)⇔(p)=(d)$
    – giannispapav
    Sep 7 at 12:49














up vote
2
down vote













I'll try to give a full answer based on the comments



An abelian group $A$ is a $mathbbZ-$module and $ann_mathbbZA=(d)$ for some $dinmathbbZ$.



I'll show that $A$ is a $mathbbF_p$ vector space iff $(p)subset (d)Leftrightarrow d|pLeftrightarrow p=d$



  • Let $ann_mathbbZ=(p)$. Then we can define a $dfracmathbbZpmathbbZ-$module structure as follows $$dfracmathbbZpmathbbZtimes Ato A$$
    with $(z+pmathbbZ,x)mapsto zx$. This is well-defined : if $(z+pmathbbZ,x)=(z'+pmathbbZ,x')Rightarrow x=x',z-z'in pmathbbZRightarrow (z-z')x=0Rightarrow zx=z'x'.$ This way $A$ becomes a $mathbbF_p-$module (=$mathbbF_p$-vector space)

  • Let $A$ an $mathbbF_p-$vector space (=$dfracmathbbZpmathbbZ$-module). Then consider the ring homomorphism $$f:mathbbZto dfracmathbbZpmathbbZ$$ with $f(z)=[z]_p$. Then we can see $A$ as a $mathbbZ-$module with multiplication $$zcdot a=f(z)a,quad forall ain A,zin mathbbZ$$. Then $$zcdot a=0Leftrightarrow f(z)a=0Leftrightarrow f(z)=[0]_pLeftrightarrow p|z$$ hence $ann_mathbbZ=(p)$





share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Don't you mean $(p) = (d)$? (Which is equivalent to $d = pm p$.)
    – Torsten Schoeneberg
    Sep 6 at 14:58










  • Yes thanks, my omission for the $pm$. In fact since $(p)$ is maximal in $mathbbZ$ and $Mnot=0$, $(p)⊂(d)⇔(p)=(d)$
    – giannispapav
    Sep 7 at 12:49












up vote
2
down vote










up vote
2
down vote









I'll try to give a full answer based on the comments



An abelian group $A$ is a $mathbbZ-$module and $ann_mathbbZA=(d)$ for some $dinmathbbZ$.



I'll show that $A$ is a $mathbbF_p$ vector space iff $(p)subset (d)Leftrightarrow d|pLeftrightarrow p=d$



  • Let $ann_mathbbZ=(p)$. Then we can define a $dfracmathbbZpmathbbZ-$module structure as follows $$dfracmathbbZpmathbbZtimes Ato A$$
    with $(z+pmathbbZ,x)mapsto zx$. This is well-defined : if $(z+pmathbbZ,x)=(z'+pmathbbZ,x')Rightarrow x=x',z-z'in pmathbbZRightarrow (z-z')x=0Rightarrow zx=z'x'.$ This way $A$ becomes a $mathbbF_p-$module (=$mathbbF_p$-vector space)

  • Let $A$ an $mathbbF_p-$vector space (=$dfracmathbbZpmathbbZ$-module). Then consider the ring homomorphism $$f:mathbbZto dfracmathbbZpmathbbZ$$ with $f(z)=[z]_p$. Then we can see $A$ as a $mathbbZ-$module with multiplication $$zcdot a=f(z)a,quad forall ain A,zin mathbbZ$$. Then $$zcdot a=0Leftrightarrow f(z)a=0Leftrightarrow f(z)=[0]_pLeftrightarrow p|z$$ hence $ann_mathbbZ=(p)$





share|cite|improve this answer












I'll try to give a full answer based on the comments



An abelian group $A$ is a $mathbbZ-$module and $ann_mathbbZA=(d)$ for some $dinmathbbZ$.



I'll show that $A$ is a $mathbbF_p$ vector space iff $(p)subset (d)Leftrightarrow d|pLeftrightarrow p=d$



  • Let $ann_mathbbZ=(p)$. Then we can define a $dfracmathbbZpmathbbZ-$module structure as follows $$dfracmathbbZpmathbbZtimes Ato A$$
    with $(z+pmathbbZ,x)mapsto zx$. This is well-defined : if $(z+pmathbbZ,x)=(z'+pmathbbZ,x')Rightarrow x=x',z-z'in pmathbbZRightarrow (z-z')x=0Rightarrow zx=z'x'.$ This way $A$ becomes a $mathbbF_p-$module (=$mathbbF_p$-vector space)

  • Let $A$ an $mathbbF_p-$vector space (=$dfracmathbbZpmathbbZ$-module). Then consider the ring homomorphism $$f:mathbbZto dfracmathbbZpmathbbZ$$ with $f(z)=[z]_p$. Then we can see $A$ as a $mathbbZ-$module with multiplication $$zcdot a=f(z)a,quad forall ain A,zin mathbbZ$$. Then $$zcdot a=0Leftrightarrow f(z)a=0Leftrightarrow f(z)=[0]_pLeftrightarrow p|z$$ hence $ann_mathbbZ=(p)$






share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Sep 6 at 7:56









giannispapav

1,340323




1,340323











  • Don't you mean $(p) = (d)$? (Which is equivalent to $d = pm p$.)
    – Torsten Schoeneberg
    Sep 6 at 14:58










  • Yes thanks, my omission for the $pm$. In fact since $(p)$ is maximal in $mathbbZ$ and $Mnot=0$, $(p)⊂(d)⇔(p)=(d)$
    – giannispapav
    Sep 7 at 12:49
















  • Don't you mean $(p) = (d)$? (Which is equivalent to $d = pm p$.)
    – Torsten Schoeneberg
    Sep 6 at 14:58










  • Yes thanks, my omission for the $pm$. In fact since $(p)$ is maximal in $mathbbZ$ and $Mnot=0$, $(p)⊂(d)⇔(p)=(d)$
    – giannispapav
    Sep 7 at 12:49















Don't you mean $(p) = (d)$? (Which is equivalent to $d = pm p$.)
– Torsten Schoeneberg
Sep 6 at 14:58




Don't you mean $(p) = (d)$? (Which is equivalent to $d = pm p$.)
– Torsten Schoeneberg
Sep 6 at 14:58












Yes thanks, my omission for the $pm$. In fact since $(p)$ is maximal in $mathbbZ$ and $Mnot=0$, $(p)⊂(d)⇔(p)=(d)$
– giannispapav
Sep 7 at 12:49




Yes thanks, my omission for the $pm$. In fact since $(p)$ is maximal in $mathbbZ$ and $Mnot=0$, $(p)⊂(d)⇔(p)=(d)$
– giannispapav
Sep 7 at 12:49

















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1444505%2fwhen-can-a-an-abelian-group-be-made-into-a-vector-space-over-bbbf-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

Carbon dioxide

Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?