Dual of cocyclic module is cyclic
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I am working on a paper, which states that the dual of a finite dimensional cocyclic module is cyclic. I tried to write down a proof, but I failed and I do not know if this is true in full generality or of it is true just in my case.
Let $A$ be a complex Hopf algebra and $M$ a finite $mathbbC$-dimensional cocyclic $A$-module with cocyclic vector $m in Msetminus lbrace 0 rbrace$, i.e. every nontrivial submodule $U subset M$ contains $m$. Let $M^* = operatornameHom(M,mathbbC)$ be the dual module. The statement is, that $M^*$ is cyclic with cyclic vector $m'$ corresponding to $m$.
What I tried so far, is the following. Let $e_1, dots, e_n$ be a $mathbbC$-basis of $M$ and let $delta_1, dots, delta_n$ be the dual basis of $M^*$, i.e. $delta_i(e_j) = delta_ij$.
We can assume that $m = e_1$, in particular $m' = delta_1$. Now since $m = e_1$ is cocyclic, there exists for every $e_i$ an element $a_i in A$ such that $a_ie_i = e_1$. To show that $M^*$ is cyclic with cyclic vector $delta_1$, it suffices to find elements $tilde a_i$ such that $tilde a_i delta_1 = delta_i$ for every $1 le i le n$.
The first obvious idea is to try to act with $a_i$ on $delta_1$ and look what happens. It is clear that
beginalign*
(a_i delta_1)(e_i) = delta_1(a_i e_i) = delta_1(e_1) = 1,
endalign*
but if we write $a_i e_j = sum_k a_k^ij e_k$, we have
beginalign*
(a_i delta_1)(e_j) = delta_1(a_i e_j) = a_1^ij
endalign*
which a priori can be nonzero.
I tried to correct the elements $a_i$ to make $a_1^ij$ be $0$, but this only works if $n = 2$, and moreover I think, that there should be a more intrinsic reason why the dual of a cocyclic is cyclic.
In the paper I am working on, my algebra is the universal enveloping algebra $U(mathfrakg otimes mathbbC[t])$ of the current algebra, where $mathfrakg$ is a semisimple finite dimensional Lie algebra. My module $M$ is in fact graded, but I do not think, that this is important.
combinatorics representation-theory lie-algebras dual-spaces hopf-algebras
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I am working on a paper, which states that the dual of a finite dimensional cocyclic module is cyclic. I tried to write down a proof, but I failed and I do not know if this is true in full generality or of it is true just in my case.
Let $A$ be a complex Hopf algebra and $M$ a finite $mathbbC$-dimensional cocyclic $A$-module with cocyclic vector $m in Msetminus lbrace 0 rbrace$, i.e. every nontrivial submodule $U subset M$ contains $m$. Let $M^* = operatornameHom(M,mathbbC)$ be the dual module. The statement is, that $M^*$ is cyclic with cyclic vector $m'$ corresponding to $m$.
What I tried so far, is the following. Let $e_1, dots, e_n$ be a $mathbbC$-basis of $M$ and let $delta_1, dots, delta_n$ be the dual basis of $M^*$, i.e. $delta_i(e_j) = delta_ij$.
We can assume that $m = e_1$, in particular $m' = delta_1$. Now since $m = e_1$ is cocyclic, there exists for every $e_i$ an element $a_i in A$ such that $a_ie_i = e_1$. To show that $M^*$ is cyclic with cyclic vector $delta_1$, it suffices to find elements $tilde a_i$ such that $tilde a_i delta_1 = delta_i$ for every $1 le i le n$.
The first obvious idea is to try to act with $a_i$ on $delta_1$ and look what happens. It is clear that
beginalign*
(a_i delta_1)(e_i) = delta_1(a_i e_i) = delta_1(e_1) = 1,
endalign*
but if we write $a_i e_j = sum_k a_k^ij e_k$, we have
beginalign*
(a_i delta_1)(e_j) = delta_1(a_i e_j) = a_1^ij
endalign*
which a priori can be nonzero.
I tried to correct the elements $a_i$ to make $a_1^ij$ be $0$, but this only works if $n = 2$, and moreover I think, that there should be a more intrinsic reason why the dual of a cocyclic is cyclic.
In the paper I am working on, my algebra is the universal enveloping algebra $U(mathfrakg otimes mathbbC[t])$ of the current algebra, where $mathfrakg$ is a semisimple finite dimensional Lie algebra. My module $M$ is in fact graded, but I do not think, that this is important.
combinatorics representation-theory lie-algebras dual-spaces hopf-algebras
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I am working on a paper, which states that the dual of a finite dimensional cocyclic module is cyclic. I tried to write down a proof, but I failed and I do not know if this is true in full generality or of it is true just in my case.
Let $A$ be a complex Hopf algebra and $M$ a finite $mathbbC$-dimensional cocyclic $A$-module with cocyclic vector $m in Msetminus lbrace 0 rbrace$, i.e. every nontrivial submodule $U subset M$ contains $m$. Let $M^* = operatornameHom(M,mathbbC)$ be the dual module. The statement is, that $M^*$ is cyclic with cyclic vector $m'$ corresponding to $m$.
What I tried so far, is the following. Let $e_1, dots, e_n$ be a $mathbbC$-basis of $M$ and let $delta_1, dots, delta_n$ be the dual basis of $M^*$, i.e. $delta_i(e_j) = delta_ij$.
We can assume that $m = e_1$, in particular $m' = delta_1$. Now since $m = e_1$ is cocyclic, there exists for every $e_i$ an element $a_i in A$ such that $a_ie_i = e_1$. To show that $M^*$ is cyclic with cyclic vector $delta_1$, it suffices to find elements $tilde a_i$ such that $tilde a_i delta_1 = delta_i$ for every $1 le i le n$.
The first obvious idea is to try to act with $a_i$ on $delta_1$ and look what happens. It is clear that
beginalign*
(a_i delta_1)(e_i) = delta_1(a_i e_i) = delta_1(e_1) = 1,
endalign*
but if we write $a_i e_j = sum_k a_k^ij e_k$, we have
beginalign*
(a_i delta_1)(e_j) = delta_1(a_i e_j) = a_1^ij
endalign*
which a priori can be nonzero.
I tried to correct the elements $a_i$ to make $a_1^ij$ be $0$, but this only works if $n = 2$, and moreover I think, that there should be a more intrinsic reason why the dual of a cocyclic is cyclic.
In the paper I am working on, my algebra is the universal enveloping algebra $U(mathfrakg otimes mathbbC[t])$ of the current algebra, where $mathfrakg$ is a semisimple finite dimensional Lie algebra. My module $M$ is in fact graded, but I do not think, that this is important.
combinatorics representation-theory lie-algebras dual-spaces hopf-algebras
I am working on a paper, which states that the dual of a finite dimensional cocyclic module is cyclic. I tried to write down a proof, but I failed and I do not know if this is true in full generality or of it is true just in my case.
Let $A$ be a complex Hopf algebra and $M$ a finite $mathbbC$-dimensional cocyclic $A$-module with cocyclic vector $m in Msetminus lbrace 0 rbrace$, i.e. every nontrivial submodule $U subset M$ contains $m$. Let $M^* = operatornameHom(M,mathbbC)$ be the dual module. The statement is, that $M^*$ is cyclic with cyclic vector $m'$ corresponding to $m$.
What I tried so far, is the following. Let $e_1, dots, e_n$ be a $mathbbC$-basis of $M$ and let $delta_1, dots, delta_n$ be the dual basis of $M^*$, i.e. $delta_i(e_j) = delta_ij$.
We can assume that $m = e_1$, in particular $m' = delta_1$. Now since $m = e_1$ is cocyclic, there exists for every $e_i$ an element $a_i in A$ such that $a_ie_i = e_1$. To show that $M^*$ is cyclic with cyclic vector $delta_1$, it suffices to find elements $tilde a_i$ such that $tilde a_i delta_1 = delta_i$ for every $1 le i le n$.
The first obvious idea is to try to act with $a_i$ on $delta_1$ and look what happens. It is clear that
beginalign*
(a_i delta_1)(e_i) = delta_1(a_i e_i) = delta_1(e_1) = 1,
endalign*
but if we write $a_i e_j = sum_k a_k^ij e_k$, we have
beginalign*
(a_i delta_1)(e_j) = delta_1(a_i e_j) = a_1^ij
endalign*
which a priori can be nonzero.
I tried to correct the elements $a_i$ to make $a_1^ij$ be $0$, but this only works if $n = 2$, and moreover I think, that there should be a more intrinsic reason why the dual of a cocyclic is cyclic.
In the paper I am working on, my algebra is the universal enveloping algebra $U(mathfrakg otimes mathbbC[t])$ of the current algebra, where $mathfrakg$ is a semisimple finite dimensional Lie algebra. My module $M$ is in fact graded, but I do not think, that this is important.
combinatorics representation-theory lie-algebras dual-spaces hopf-algebras
combinatorics representation-theory lie-algebras dual-spaces hopf-algebras
edited Sep 7 at 9:42
asked Sep 6 at 10:03
jakyla85
183
183
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
It's not true that cyclic or cocyclic modules have to be simple (e.g. Verma modules are cyclic but not always simple).
A module is cyclic if (not only if) it has unique maximal proper submodule, and a cocyclic module is one with a unique minimal nonzero submodule ($Am$, in your notation - let's call it $S$).
To prove $M^*$ is cyclic, we show it has a unique maximal submodule. Consider the proper submodule $S^perp=fin M^* : f(S)=0 leqslant M^*$ which I claim is unique maximal. To see this, let $T < M^*$. Then $0 neq T^o = x in M : forall t in T, t(x)=0 leqslant M$, so $S leqslant T^o$, so $T^o perp leqslant S^perp$, so $T leqslant S^perp$ as $T leqslant T^o perp$. The only reason you need Hopf algebras is so that all of these things are submodules.
True, cyclic does not imply simple. I edited the original post. What is $S^perp$ in your notation?
â jakyla85
Sep 7 at 9:42
Just what it means for vector spaces. I'll edit...
â m_t_
Sep 7 at 10:22
1
And besides, $mathbbZ/6mathbbZ$ is cyclic but has two maximal proper submodules...
â jakyla85
Sep 7 at 10:42
My mistake - I should have said that a module is cyclic if it has a unique maximal submodule
â m_t_
Sep 7 at 11:19
1
Thanks, I missed the part with the finite generation.
â jakyla85
Sep 7 at 12:17
 |Â
show 2 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
It's not true that cyclic or cocyclic modules have to be simple (e.g. Verma modules are cyclic but not always simple).
A module is cyclic if (not only if) it has unique maximal proper submodule, and a cocyclic module is one with a unique minimal nonzero submodule ($Am$, in your notation - let's call it $S$).
To prove $M^*$ is cyclic, we show it has a unique maximal submodule. Consider the proper submodule $S^perp=fin M^* : f(S)=0 leqslant M^*$ which I claim is unique maximal. To see this, let $T < M^*$. Then $0 neq T^o = x in M : forall t in T, t(x)=0 leqslant M$, so $S leqslant T^o$, so $T^o perp leqslant S^perp$, so $T leqslant S^perp$ as $T leqslant T^o perp$. The only reason you need Hopf algebras is so that all of these things are submodules.
True, cyclic does not imply simple. I edited the original post. What is $S^perp$ in your notation?
â jakyla85
Sep 7 at 9:42
Just what it means for vector spaces. I'll edit...
â m_t_
Sep 7 at 10:22
1
And besides, $mathbbZ/6mathbbZ$ is cyclic but has two maximal proper submodules...
â jakyla85
Sep 7 at 10:42
My mistake - I should have said that a module is cyclic if it has a unique maximal submodule
â m_t_
Sep 7 at 11:19
1
Thanks, I missed the part with the finite generation.
â jakyla85
Sep 7 at 12:17
 |Â
show 2 more comments
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
It's not true that cyclic or cocyclic modules have to be simple (e.g. Verma modules are cyclic but not always simple).
A module is cyclic if (not only if) it has unique maximal proper submodule, and a cocyclic module is one with a unique minimal nonzero submodule ($Am$, in your notation - let's call it $S$).
To prove $M^*$ is cyclic, we show it has a unique maximal submodule. Consider the proper submodule $S^perp=fin M^* : f(S)=0 leqslant M^*$ which I claim is unique maximal. To see this, let $T < M^*$. Then $0 neq T^o = x in M : forall t in T, t(x)=0 leqslant M$, so $S leqslant T^o$, so $T^o perp leqslant S^perp$, so $T leqslant S^perp$ as $T leqslant T^o perp$. The only reason you need Hopf algebras is so that all of these things are submodules.
True, cyclic does not imply simple. I edited the original post. What is $S^perp$ in your notation?
â jakyla85
Sep 7 at 9:42
Just what it means for vector spaces. I'll edit...
â m_t_
Sep 7 at 10:22
1
And besides, $mathbbZ/6mathbbZ$ is cyclic but has two maximal proper submodules...
â jakyla85
Sep 7 at 10:42
My mistake - I should have said that a module is cyclic if it has a unique maximal submodule
â m_t_
Sep 7 at 11:19
1
Thanks, I missed the part with the finite generation.
â jakyla85
Sep 7 at 12:17
 |Â
show 2 more comments
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
It's not true that cyclic or cocyclic modules have to be simple (e.g. Verma modules are cyclic but not always simple).
A module is cyclic if (not only if) it has unique maximal proper submodule, and a cocyclic module is one with a unique minimal nonzero submodule ($Am$, in your notation - let's call it $S$).
To prove $M^*$ is cyclic, we show it has a unique maximal submodule. Consider the proper submodule $S^perp=fin M^* : f(S)=0 leqslant M^*$ which I claim is unique maximal. To see this, let $T < M^*$. Then $0 neq T^o = x in M : forall t in T, t(x)=0 leqslant M$, so $S leqslant T^o$, so $T^o perp leqslant S^perp$, so $T leqslant S^perp$ as $T leqslant T^o perp$. The only reason you need Hopf algebras is so that all of these things are submodules.
It's not true that cyclic or cocyclic modules have to be simple (e.g. Verma modules are cyclic but not always simple).
A module is cyclic if (not only if) it has unique maximal proper submodule, and a cocyclic module is one with a unique minimal nonzero submodule ($Am$, in your notation - let's call it $S$).
To prove $M^*$ is cyclic, we show it has a unique maximal submodule. Consider the proper submodule $S^perp=fin M^* : f(S)=0 leqslant M^*$ which I claim is unique maximal. To see this, let $T < M^*$. Then $0 neq T^o = x in M : forall t in T, t(x)=0 leqslant M$, so $S leqslant T^o$, so $T^o perp leqslant S^perp$, so $T leqslant S^perp$ as $T leqslant T^o perp$. The only reason you need Hopf algebras is so that all of these things are submodules.
edited Sep 7 at 11:24
answered Sep 6 at 14:16
m_t_
6,96022244
6,96022244
True, cyclic does not imply simple. I edited the original post. What is $S^perp$ in your notation?
â jakyla85
Sep 7 at 9:42
Just what it means for vector spaces. I'll edit...
â m_t_
Sep 7 at 10:22
1
And besides, $mathbbZ/6mathbbZ$ is cyclic but has two maximal proper submodules...
â jakyla85
Sep 7 at 10:42
My mistake - I should have said that a module is cyclic if it has a unique maximal submodule
â m_t_
Sep 7 at 11:19
1
Thanks, I missed the part with the finite generation.
â jakyla85
Sep 7 at 12:17
 |Â
show 2 more comments
True, cyclic does not imply simple. I edited the original post. What is $S^perp$ in your notation?
â jakyla85
Sep 7 at 9:42
Just what it means for vector spaces. I'll edit...
â m_t_
Sep 7 at 10:22
1
And besides, $mathbbZ/6mathbbZ$ is cyclic but has two maximal proper submodules...
â jakyla85
Sep 7 at 10:42
My mistake - I should have said that a module is cyclic if it has a unique maximal submodule
â m_t_
Sep 7 at 11:19
1
Thanks, I missed the part with the finite generation.
â jakyla85
Sep 7 at 12:17
True, cyclic does not imply simple. I edited the original post. What is $S^perp$ in your notation?
â jakyla85
Sep 7 at 9:42
True, cyclic does not imply simple. I edited the original post. What is $S^perp$ in your notation?
â jakyla85
Sep 7 at 9:42
Just what it means for vector spaces. I'll edit...
â m_t_
Sep 7 at 10:22
Just what it means for vector spaces. I'll edit...
â m_t_
Sep 7 at 10:22
1
1
And besides, $mathbbZ/6mathbbZ$ is cyclic but has two maximal proper submodules...
â jakyla85
Sep 7 at 10:42
And besides, $mathbbZ/6mathbbZ$ is cyclic but has two maximal proper submodules...
â jakyla85
Sep 7 at 10:42
My mistake - I should have said that a module is cyclic if it has a unique maximal submodule
â m_t_
Sep 7 at 11:19
My mistake - I should have said that a module is cyclic if it has a unique maximal submodule
â m_t_
Sep 7 at 11:19
1
1
Thanks, I missed the part with the finite generation.
â jakyla85
Sep 7 at 12:17
Thanks, I missed the part with the finite generation.
â jakyla85
Sep 7 at 12:17
 |Â
show 2 more comments
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2907298%2fdual-of-cocyclic-module-is-cyclic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password