Basic $theta$-function identity proof
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
For the $theta$-function $$theta (z) = sum_n in mathbbz q^n^2e^2pi inz,$$
for $q$ given by $e^pi itau$ for some $tau in mathbbC$ with $Im(tau) > 0$, suppose we've proved the results $theta(z+1) = theta (z)$ and $theta(z+tau)=q^-1e^-2pi iztheta(z)$ for any $z in mathbbC$. Is it possible to prove that $$theta(z+tau^*) = -e^-2pi iztheta(tau^* - z)$$ for any $z in mathbbC$ where $tau^* = frac1+tau2$? I'm assuming you can use a trick where you change $n$ to $n-1$ or $-n$ in one of the sums to get the other, but I haven't been able to puzzle out the details yet and there's probably a quick proof out there.
I mentioned the earlier two identities because they're clearly similar, but it's hard to see how to apply them when we have a fraction in the argument and not an ordinary linear combination of $1$ and $tau$. Any help would be appreciated.
complex-analysis theta-functions
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
For the $theta$-function $$theta (z) = sum_n in mathbbz q^n^2e^2pi inz,$$
for $q$ given by $e^pi itau$ for some $tau in mathbbC$ with $Im(tau) > 0$, suppose we've proved the results $theta(z+1) = theta (z)$ and $theta(z+tau)=q^-1e^-2pi iztheta(z)$ for any $z in mathbbC$. Is it possible to prove that $$theta(z+tau^*) = -e^-2pi iztheta(tau^* - z)$$ for any $z in mathbbC$ where $tau^* = frac1+tau2$? I'm assuming you can use a trick where you change $n$ to $n-1$ or $-n$ in one of the sums to get the other, but I haven't been able to puzzle out the details yet and there's probably a quick proof out there.
I mentioned the earlier two identities because they're clearly similar, but it's hard to see how to apply them when we have a fraction in the argument and not an ordinary linear combination of $1$ and $tau$. Any help would be appreciated.
complex-analysis theta-functions
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
For the $theta$-function $$theta (z) = sum_n in mathbbz q^n^2e^2pi inz,$$
for $q$ given by $e^pi itau$ for some $tau in mathbbC$ with $Im(tau) > 0$, suppose we've proved the results $theta(z+1) = theta (z)$ and $theta(z+tau)=q^-1e^-2pi iztheta(z)$ for any $z in mathbbC$. Is it possible to prove that $$theta(z+tau^*) = -e^-2pi iztheta(tau^* - z)$$ for any $z in mathbbC$ where $tau^* = frac1+tau2$? I'm assuming you can use a trick where you change $n$ to $n-1$ or $-n$ in one of the sums to get the other, but I haven't been able to puzzle out the details yet and there's probably a quick proof out there.
I mentioned the earlier two identities because they're clearly similar, but it's hard to see how to apply them when we have a fraction in the argument and not an ordinary linear combination of $1$ and $tau$. Any help would be appreciated.
complex-analysis theta-functions
For the $theta$-function $$theta (z) = sum_n in mathbbz q^n^2e^2pi inz,$$
for $q$ given by $e^pi itau$ for some $tau in mathbbC$ with $Im(tau) > 0$, suppose we've proved the results $theta(z+1) = theta (z)$ and $theta(z+tau)=q^-1e^-2pi iztheta(z)$ for any $z in mathbbC$. Is it possible to prove that $$theta(z+tau^*) = -e^-2pi iztheta(tau^* - z)$$ for any $z in mathbbC$ where $tau^* = frac1+tau2$? I'm assuming you can use a trick where you change $n$ to $n-1$ or $-n$ in one of the sums to get the other, but I haven't been able to puzzle out the details yet and there's probably a quick proof out there.
I mentioned the earlier two identities because they're clearly similar, but it's hard to see how to apply them when we have a fraction in the argument and not an ordinary linear combination of $1$ and $tau$. Any help would be appreciated.
complex-analysis theta-functions
complex-analysis theta-functions
asked Feb 19 at 14:33
SPS
17611
17611
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
If you write out the expansion of $theta(z+tau^*)$ you have
$$ theta(z+tau^*) = sum_n=-infty^+infty(-1)^n q^n(n+1) e^2pi i n z$$
If you write out $-e^-2pi i z theta(tau^* -z)$ you have
$$-e^-2pi i z theta(tau^* -z) = -e^-2pi i z sum_n=-infty^+infty (-1)^n q^n^2 + n e^-2pi i n z$$
If take this and change the summation variable $nrightarrow -n$, you have
$$ -e^-2pi i z theta(tau^* -z) = -e^-2pi i z sum_n=-infty^+infty (-1)^n q^n^2 -n e^2pi i n z = sum_n=-infty^+infty (-1)^n-1 q^n^2 -n e^2pi i z (n-1)$$
Now if we make the change of variable $nrightarrow m+1$ we have
$$sum_n=-infty^+infty (-1)^n-1 q^n^2 -n e^2pi i z (n-1) = sum_m=-infty^+infty (-1)^m q^m(m+1)e^2pi i m z$$
and so the two expressions are equal.
I hope this answers your question.
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
If you write out the expansion of $theta(z+tau^*)$ you have
$$ theta(z+tau^*) = sum_n=-infty^+infty(-1)^n q^n(n+1) e^2pi i n z$$
If you write out $-e^-2pi i z theta(tau^* -z)$ you have
$$-e^-2pi i z theta(tau^* -z) = -e^-2pi i z sum_n=-infty^+infty (-1)^n q^n^2 + n e^-2pi i n z$$
If take this and change the summation variable $nrightarrow -n$, you have
$$ -e^-2pi i z theta(tau^* -z) = -e^-2pi i z sum_n=-infty^+infty (-1)^n q^n^2 -n e^2pi i n z = sum_n=-infty^+infty (-1)^n-1 q^n^2 -n e^2pi i z (n-1)$$
Now if we make the change of variable $nrightarrow m+1$ we have
$$sum_n=-infty^+infty (-1)^n-1 q^n^2 -n e^2pi i z (n-1) = sum_m=-infty^+infty (-1)^m q^m(m+1)e^2pi i m z$$
and so the two expressions are equal.
I hope this answers your question.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
If you write out the expansion of $theta(z+tau^*)$ you have
$$ theta(z+tau^*) = sum_n=-infty^+infty(-1)^n q^n(n+1) e^2pi i n z$$
If you write out $-e^-2pi i z theta(tau^* -z)$ you have
$$-e^-2pi i z theta(tau^* -z) = -e^-2pi i z sum_n=-infty^+infty (-1)^n q^n^2 + n e^-2pi i n z$$
If take this and change the summation variable $nrightarrow -n$, you have
$$ -e^-2pi i z theta(tau^* -z) = -e^-2pi i z sum_n=-infty^+infty (-1)^n q^n^2 -n e^2pi i n z = sum_n=-infty^+infty (-1)^n-1 q^n^2 -n e^2pi i z (n-1)$$
Now if we make the change of variable $nrightarrow m+1$ we have
$$sum_n=-infty^+infty (-1)^n-1 q^n^2 -n e^2pi i z (n-1) = sum_m=-infty^+infty (-1)^m q^m(m+1)e^2pi i m z$$
and so the two expressions are equal.
I hope this answers your question.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
If you write out the expansion of $theta(z+tau^*)$ you have
$$ theta(z+tau^*) = sum_n=-infty^+infty(-1)^n q^n(n+1) e^2pi i n z$$
If you write out $-e^-2pi i z theta(tau^* -z)$ you have
$$-e^-2pi i z theta(tau^* -z) = -e^-2pi i z sum_n=-infty^+infty (-1)^n q^n^2 + n e^-2pi i n z$$
If take this and change the summation variable $nrightarrow -n$, you have
$$ -e^-2pi i z theta(tau^* -z) = -e^-2pi i z sum_n=-infty^+infty (-1)^n q^n^2 -n e^2pi i n z = sum_n=-infty^+infty (-1)^n-1 q^n^2 -n e^2pi i z (n-1)$$
Now if we make the change of variable $nrightarrow m+1$ we have
$$sum_n=-infty^+infty (-1)^n-1 q^n^2 -n e^2pi i z (n-1) = sum_m=-infty^+infty (-1)^m q^m(m+1)e^2pi i m z$$
and so the two expressions are equal.
I hope this answers your question.
If you write out the expansion of $theta(z+tau^*)$ you have
$$ theta(z+tau^*) = sum_n=-infty^+infty(-1)^n q^n(n+1) e^2pi i n z$$
If you write out $-e^-2pi i z theta(tau^* -z)$ you have
$$-e^-2pi i z theta(tau^* -z) = -e^-2pi i z sum_n=-infty^+infty (-1)^n q^n^2 + n e^-2pi i n z$$
If take this and change the summation variable $nrightarrow -n$, you have
$$ -e^-2pi i z theta(tau^* -z) = -e^-2pi i z sum_n=-infty^+infty (-1)^n q^n^2 -n e^2pi i n z = sum_n=-infty^+infty (-1)^n-1 q^n^2 -n e^2pi i z (n-1)$$
Now if we make the change of variable $nrightarrow m+1$ we have
$$sum_n=-infty^+infty (-1)^n-1 q^n^2 -n e^2pi i z (n-1) = sum_m=-infty^+infty (-1)^m q^m(m+1)e^2pi i m z$$
and so the two expressions are equal.
I hope this answers your question.
answered Sep 6 at 9:42
Aran
514
514
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2657049%2fbasic-theta-function-identity-proof%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password