What is the Laplace transform of this convolution-like integral?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












We have the following integral in the time domain :
$$int_0^infty e^ucos(2(u-t))y(u)du$$
This is very similar to the convolution integral. I'm not sure if the $2$ scaling in the cosine function causes problems and we can't say that this is convolution. If it is, the convolution is multiplication in the s-domain and the transform we are looking for is :



$$L[e^uy(u)] cdot L[cos(2(u-t))$$ The first part is easily found using the complex shift property giving $Y(s-1)$. Now for the second part we'll have to use the time shift property along with the scaling property. My question is what comes first? Or maybe, is the function shifted by $t$ or $2t$? I always get confused when scaling and delay take place at the same time.



Since $$L[cosat]=fracss^2+a^2$$ one solution could be :
$$L[cos(2(u-t))=e^-sfracss^2+4$$ Is that the way to go?










share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    We have the following integral in the time domain :
    $$int_0^infty e^ucos(2(u-t))y(u)du$$
    This is very similar to the convolution integral. I'm not sure if the $2$ scaling in the cosine function causes problems and we can't say that this is convolution. If it is, the convolution is multiplication in the s-domain and the transform we are looking for is :



    $$L[e^uy(u)] cdot L[cos(2(u-t))$$ The first part is easily found using the complex shift property giving $Y(s-1)$. Now for the second part we'll have to use the time shift property along with the scaling property. My question is what comes first? Or maybe, is the function shifted by $t$ or $2t$? I always get confused when scaling and delay take place at the same time.



    Since $$L[cosat]=fracss^2+a^2$$ one solution could be :
    $$L[cos(2(u-t))=e^-sfracss^2+4$$ Is that the way to go?










    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      We have the following integral in the time domain :
      $$int_0^infty e^ucos(2(u-t))y(u)du$$
      This is very similar to the convolution integral. I'm not sure if the $2$ scaling in the cosine function causes problems and we can't say that this is convolution. If it is, the convolution is multiplication in the s-domain and the transform we are looking for is :



      $$L[e^uy(u)] cdot L[cos(2(u-t))$$ The first part is easily found using the complex shift property giving $Y(s-1)$. Now for the second part we'll have to use the time shift property along with the scaling property. My question is what comes first? Or maybe, is the function shifted by $t$ or $2t$? I always get confused when scaling and delay take place at the same time.



      Since $$L[cosat]=fracss^2+a^2$$ one solution could be :
      $$L[cos(2(u-t))=e^-sfracss^2+4$$ Is that the way to go?










      share|cite|improve this question













      We have the following integral in the time domain :
      $$int_0^infty e^ucos(2(u-t))y(u)du$$
      This is very similar to the convolution integral. I'm not sure if the $2$ scaling in the cosine function causes problems and we can't say that this is convolution. If it is, the convolution is multiplication in the s-domain and the transform we are looking for is :



      $$L[e^uy(u)] cdot L[cos(2(u-t))$$ The first part is easily found using the complex shift property giving $Y(s-1)$. Now for the second part we'll have to use the time shift property along with the scaling property. My question is what comes first? Or maybe, is the function shifted by $t$ or $2t$? I always get confused when scaling and delay take place at the same time.



      Since $$L[cosat]=fracss^2+a^2$$ one solution could be :
      $$L[cos(2(u-t))=e^-sfracss^2+4$$ Is that the way to go?







      functions laplace-transform






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Sep 6 at 8:38









      John Katsantas

      36718




      36718




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          Are you sure that the upper limit of your integral is $infty$ and not $t$? Because, if it is not $t$, that's not a convolution, for Laplace transforms. I'm assuming that it is $infty$, as written.



          You can still write down the Laplace transformation integral,
          switch the order of integration, and end up with



          $$
          F(s) = int_0^infty du , exp(u) , y(u)
          int_0^infty dt , exp(-st) cos[2(u-t)]
          $$



          So the first stage is still $mathcalL[cos(2(u-t))]$,
          or $mathcalL[cos(2(t-u))]$ of course, since $cos$ is even. Instead of using the time-shifting formula (which would apply when the function of $t-u$ to be transformed includes a Heaviside step function $H(t-u)$,
          i.e. is zero for $t<u$, which is not the case here) I think it's clearest to do it using
          $$
          cos(2t-2u)=cos 2u cos 2t + sin 2u sin 2t
          $$
          and use the Laplace transforms of $cos 2t$ and $sin 2t$. This gives
          $$
          mathcalL[cos(2(t-u))] = fracscos 2u+2sin 2us^2+4
          $$
          The remaining integrations
          $$
          F(s) = fracss^2+4 int_0^infty du , cos 2u exp(u) , y(u)
          +
          frac2s^2+4 int_0^infty du , sin 2u exp(u) , y(u)
          $$
          don't immediately look like simple transforms of $y(u)$.
          Indeed,
          the presence of the $exp(u)$ term makes me worry about convergence.
          But of course, this basic structure of the integral was there from the start;
          the Laplace transformation has not altered it much.
          Good luck.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2907232%2fwhat-is-the-laplace-transform-of-this-convolution-like-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            1
            down vote













            Are you sure that the upper limit of your integral is $infty$ and not $t$? Because, if it is not $t$, that's not a convolution, for Laplace transforms. I'm assuming that it is $infty$, as written.



            You can still write down the Laplace transformation integral,
            switch the order of integration, and end up with



            $$
            F(s) = int_0^infty du , exp(u) , y(u)
            int_0^infty dt , exp(-st) cos[2(u-t)]
            $$



            So the first stage is still $mathcalL[cos(2(u-t))]$,
            or $mathcalL[cos(2(t-u))]$ of course, since $cos$ is even. Instead of using the time-shifting formula (which would apply when the function of $t-u$ to be transformed includes a Heaviside step function $H(t-u)$,
            i.e. is zero for $t<u$, which is not the case here) I think it's clearest to do it using
            $$
            cos(2t-2u)=cos 2u cos 2t + sin 2u sin 2t
            $$
            and use the Laplace transforms of $cos 2t$ and $sin 2t$. This gives
            $$
            mathcalL[cos(2(t-u))] = fracscos 2u+2sin 2us^2+4
            $$
            The remaining integrations
            $$
            F(s) = fracss^2+4 int_0^infty du , cos 2u exp(u) , y(u)
            +
            frac2s^2+4 int_0^infty du , sin 2u exp(u) , y(u)
            $$
            don't immediately look like simple transforms of $y(u)$.
            Indeed,
            the presence of the $exp(u)$ term makes me worry about convergence.
            But of course, this basic structure of the integral was there from the start;
            the Laplace transformation has not altered it much.
            Good luck.






            share|cite|improve this answer
























              up vote
              1
              down vote













              Are you sure that the upper limit of your integral is $infty$ and not $t$? Because, if it is not $t$, that's not a convolution, for Laplace transforms. I'm assuming that it is $infty$, as written.



              You can still write down the Laplace transformation integral,
              switch the order of integration, and end up with



              $$
              F(s) = int_0^infty du , exp(u) , y(u)
              int_0^infty dt , exp(-st) cos[2(u-t)]
              $$



              So the first stage is still $mathcalL[cos(2(u-t))]$,
              or $mathcalL[cos(2(t-u))]$ of course, since $cos$ is even. Instead of using the time-shifting formula (which would apply when the function of $t-u$ to be transformed includes a Heaviside step function $H(t-u)$,
              i.e. is zero for $t<u$, which is not the case here) I think it's clearest to do it using
              $$
              cos(2t-2u)=cos 2u cos 2t + sin 2u sin 2t
              $$
              and use the Laplace transforms of $cos 2t$ and $sin 2t$. This gives
              $$
              mathcalL[cos(2(t-u))] = fracscos 2u+2sin 2us^2+4
              $$
              The remaining integrations
              $$
              F(s) = fracss^2+4 int_0^infty du , cos 2u exp(u) , y(u)
              +
              frac2s^2+4 int_0^infty du , sin 2u exp(u) , y(u)
              $$
              don't immediately look like simple transforms of $y(u)$.
              Indeed,
              the presence of the $exp(u)$ term makes me worry about convergence.
              But of course, this basic structure of the integral was there from the start;
              the Laplace transformation has not altered it much.
              Good luck.






              share|cite|improve this answer






















                up vote
                1
                down vote










                up vote
                1
                down vote









                Are you sure that the upper limit of your integral is $infty$ and not $t$? Because, if it is not $t$, that's not a convolution, for Laplace transforms. I'm assuming that it is $infty$, as written.



                You can still write down the Laplace transformation integral,
                switch the order of integration, and end up with



                $$
                F(s) = int_0^infty du , exp(u) , y(u)
                int_0^infty dt , exp(-st) cos[2(u-t)]
                $$



                So the first stage is still $mathcalL[cos(2(u-t))]$,
                or $mathcalL[cos(2(t-u))]$ of course, since $cos$ is even. Instead of using the time-shifting formula (which would apply when the function of $t-u$ to be transformed includes a Heaviside step function $H(t-u)$,
                i.e. is zero for $t<u$, which is not the case here) I think it's clearest to do it using
                $$
                cos(2t-2u)=cos 2u cos 2t + sin 2u sin 2t
                $$
                and use the Laplace transforms of $cos 2t$ and $sin 2t$. This gives
                $$
                mathcalL[cos(2(t-u))] = fracscos 2u+2sin 2us^2+4
                $$
                The remaining integrations
                $$
                F(s) = fracss^2+4 int_0^infty du , cos 2u exp(u) , y(u)
                +
                frac2s^2+4 int_0^infty du , sin 2u exp(u) , y(u)
                $$
                don't immediately look like simple transforms of $y(u)$.
                Indeed,
                the presence of the $exp(u)$ term makes me worry about convergence.
                But of course, this basic structure of the integral was there from the start;
                the Laplace transformation has not altered it much.
                Good luck.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                Are you sure that the upper limit of your integral is $infty$ and not $t$? Because, if it is not $t$, that's not a convolution, for Laplace transforms. I'm assuming that it is $infty$, as written.



                You can still write down the Laplace transformation integral,
                switch the order of integration, and end up with



                $$
                F(s) = int_0^infty du , exp(u) , y(u)
                int_0^infty dt , exp(-st) cos[2(u-t)]
                $$



                So the first stage is still $mathcalL[cos(2(u-t))]$,
                or $mathcalL[cos(2(t-u))]$ of course, since $cos$ is even. Instead of using the time-shifting formula (which would apply when the function of $t-u$ to be transformed includes a Heaviside step function $H(t-u)$,
                i.e. is zero for $t<u$, which is not the case here) I think it's clearest to do it using
                $$
                cos(2t-2u)=cos 2u cos 2t + sin 2u sin 2t
                $$
                and use the Laplace transforms of $cos 2t$ and $sin 2t$. This gives
                $$
                mathcalL[cos(2(t-u))] = fracscos 2u+2sin 2us^2+4
                $$
                The remaining integrations
                $$
                F(s) = fracss^2+4 int_0^infty du , cos 2u exp(u) , y(u)
                +
                frac2s^2+4 int_0^infty du , sin 2u exp(u) , y(u)
                $$
                don't immediately look like simple transforms of $y(u)$.
                Indeed,
                the presence of the $exp(u)$ term makes me worry about convergence.
                But of course, this basic structure of the integral was there from the start;
                the Laplace transformation has not altered it much.
                Good luck.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Sep 6 at 13:20









                LonelyProf

                32616




                32616



























                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2907232%2fwhat-is-the-laplace-transform-of-this-convolution-like-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    這個網誌中的熱門文章

                    How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

                    Mutual Information Always Non-negative

                    Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?