Show $sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=frac-,n!(1-a)_nBig(gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1frac1kfrac(1-a)_kk!Big)$

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












The conjectured identity of the title,
$$(C)quadsum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=frac-,n!(1-a)_nBig(gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1frac1kfrac(1-a)_kk!Big)$$
arose in an attempt to generalize a specific case of this identity for $a=1/2.$ (The symbol $(a)_k$ is the Pochhammer symbol.) The specific identity I proved was
$$sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+1/2)binomn+kk=fracn!(1/2)_n sum_k=n^infty frac1k frac(1/2)_kk!=frac2^2nbinom2nnbig(2log2 - sum_k=1^n-1frac2^-2kkbinom2kkbig)$$
This form is suggestive of $(C),$ for we can sum from 1 to $infty$ and subtract the series tail and use the known summation,
$$sum_k=1^infty frac1k frac(1-a)_kk!=-gamma - psi(a),$$
the two terms being Euler's constant and the digamma function, respectively. The proof I prefer is one that doesn't require a knowledge of the RHS of $(C).$ For example, I'd prefer not to have it shown that both sides obey the same recursion relationship with a boundary condition.







share|cite|improve this question




















  • It seems simpler to ask for proofs of the equivalent identities $$sum_k=0^infty frack!(k+a),(n+k)!=frac1(1-a)_nsum_k=n^inftyfrac(1-a)_kk,k!$$
    – Did
    Aug 23 at 6:09







  • 1




    Isn't it enough to check that both the RHS and the LHS have the same residues at the simple poles $a=0, a=-1,ldots, a=-n$?
    – Jack D'Aurizio♦
    Aug 23 at 14:49










  • Hello Jack. This might be a valid approach, but can you do it without knowing the RHS of the equation?
    – skbmoore
    Aug 26 at 16:09














up vote
1
down vote

favorite












The conjectured identity of the title,
$$(C)quadsum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=frac-,n!(1-a)_nBig(gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1frac1kfrac(1-a)_kk!Big)$$
arose in an attempt to generalize a specific case of this identity for $a=1/2.$ (The symbol $(a)_k$ is the Pochhammer symbol.) The specific identity I proved was
$$sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+1/2)binomn+kk=fracn!(1/2)_n sum_k=n^infty frac1k frac(1/2)_kk!=frac2^2nbinom2nnbig(2log2 - sum_k=1^n-1frac2^-2kkbinom2kkbig)$$
This form is suggestive of $(C),$ for we can sum from 1 to $infty$ and subtract the series tail and use the known summation,
$$sum_k=1^infty frac1k frac(1-a)_kk!=-gamma - psi(a),$$
the two terms being Euler's constant and the digamma function, respectively. The proof I prefer is one that doesn't require a knowledge of the RHS of $(C).$ For example, I'd prefer not to have it shown that both sides obey the same recursion relationship with a boundary condition.







share|cite|improve this question




















  • It seems simpler to ask for proofs of the equivalent identities $$sum_k=0^infty frack!(k+a),(n+k)!=frac1(1-a)_nsum_k=n^inftyfrac(1-a)_kk,k!$$
    – Did
    Aug 23 at 6:09







  • 1




    Isn't it enough to check that both the RHS and the LHS have the same residues at the simple poles $a=0, a=-1,ldots, a=-n$?
    – Jack D'Aurizio♦
    Aug 23 at 14:49










  • Hello Jack. This might be a valid approach, but can you do it without knowing the RHS of the equation?
    – skbmoore
    Aug 26 at 16:09












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











The conjectured identity of the title,
$$(C)quadsum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=frac-,n!(1-a)_nBig(gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1frac1kfrac(1-a)_kk!Big)$$
arose in an attempt to generalize a specific case of this identity for $a=1/2.$ (The symbol $(a)_k$ is the Pochhammer symbol.) The specific identity I proved was
$$sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+1/2)binomn+kk=fracn!(1/2)_n sum_k=n^infty frac1k frac(1/2)_kk!=frac2^2nbinom2nnbig(2log2 - sum_k=1^n-1frac2^-2kkbinom2kkbig)$$
This form is suggestive of $(C),$ for we can sum from 1 to $infty$ and subtract the series tail and use the known summation,
$$sum_k=1^infty frac1k frac(1-a)_kk!=-gamma - psi(a),$$
the two terms being Euler's constant and the digamma function, respectively. The proof I prefer is one that doesn't require a knowledge of the RHS of $(C).$ For example, I'd prefer not to have it shown that both sides obey the same recursion relationship with a boundary condition.







share|cite|improve this question












The conjectured identity of the title,
$$(C)quadsum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=frac-,n!(1-a)_nBig(gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1frac1kfrac(1-a)_kk!Big)$$
arose in an attempt to generalize a specific case of this identity for $a=1/2.$ (The symbol $(a)_k$ is the Pochhammer symbol.) The specific identity I proved was
$$sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+1/2)binomn+kk=fracn!(1/2)_n sum_k=n^infty frac1k frac(1/2)_kk!=frac2^2nbinom2nnbig(2log2 - sum_k=1^n-1frac2^-2kkbinom2kkbig)$$
This form is suggestive of $(C),$ for we can sum from 1 to $infty$ and subtract the series tail and use the known summation,
$$sum_k=1^infty frac1k frac(1-a)_kk!=-gamma - psi(a),$$
the two terms being Euler's constant and the digamma function, respectively. The proof I prefer is one that doesn't require a knowledge of the RHS of $(C).$ For example, I'd prefer not to have it shown that both sides obey the same recursion relationship with a boundary condition.









share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Aug 23 at 4:41









skbmoore

1,31729




1,31729











  • It seems simpler to ask for proofs of the equivalent identities $$sum_k=0^infty frack!(k+a),(n+k)!=frac1(1-a)_nsum_k=n^inftyfrac(1-a)_kk,k!$$
    – Did
    Aug 23 at 6:09







  • 1




    Isn't it enough to check that both the RHS and the LHS have the same residues at the simple poles $a=0, a=-1,ldots, a=-n$?
    – Jack D'Aurizio♦
    Aug 23 at 14:49










  • Hello Jack. This might be a valid approach, but can you do it without knowing the RHS of the equation?
    – skbmoore
    Aug 26 at 16:09
















  • It seems simpler to ask for proofs of the equivalent identities $$sum_k=0^infty frack!(k+a),(n+k)!=frac1(1-a)_nsum_k=n^inftyfrac(1-a)_kk,k!$$
    – Did
    Aug 23 at 6:09







  • 1




    Isn't it enough to check that both the RHS and the LHS have the same residues at the simple poles $a=0, a=-1,ldots, a=-n$?
    – Jack D'Aurizio♦
    Aug 23 at 14:49










  • Hello Jack. This might be a valid approach, but can you do it without knowing the RHS of the equation?
    – skbmoore
    Aug 26 at 16:09















It seems simpler to ask for proofs of the equivalent identities $$sum_k=0^infty frack!(k+a),(n+k)!=frac1(1-a)_nsum_k=n^inftyfrac(1-a)_kk,k!$$
– Did
Aug 23 at 6:09





It seems simpler to ask for proofs of the equivalent identities $$sum_k=0^infty frack!(k+a),(n+k)!=frac1(1-a)_nsum_k=n^inftyfrac(1-a)_kk,k!$$
– Did
Aug 23 at 6:09





1




1




Isn't it enough to check that both the RHS and the LHS have the same residues at the simple poles $a=0, a=-1,ldots, a=-n$?
– Jack D'Aurizio♦
Aug 23 at 14:49




Isn't it enough to check that both the RHS and the LHS have the same residues at the simple poles $a=0, a=-1,ldots, a=-n$?
– Jack D'Aurizio♦
Aug 23 at 14:49












Hello Jack. This might be a valid approach, but can you do it without knowing the RHS of the equation?
– skbmoore
Aug 26 at 16:09




Hello Jack. This might be a valid approach, but can you do it without knowing the RHS of the equation?
– skbmoore
Aug 26 at 16:09










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










The sum is an hypergeometric series :
$$sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=sum_k=0^infty fracn!k!(k+a)(k+n)!=n!sum_k=0^infty fracGamma(k+1)(k+a)Gamma(n+k+1) $$
From the properties of the Hypergeometric function : http://mathworld.wolfram.com/HypergeometricFunction.html
$$_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;x)=sum_k=0^infty fracGamma(k+1)Gamma(k+1)Gamma(k+a)Gamma(a+1)Gamma(n+1)Gamma(1)Gamma(1)Gamma(a)Gamma(k+a+1)Gamma(k+n+1)fracx^kk! \=a:n!sum_k=0^infty fracGamma(k+1)(k+a)Gamma(k+n+1)x^k$$
With $x=1$ :



$$sum_k=0^infty fracGamma(k+1)(k+a)Gamma(k+n+1)=frac1an!,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1)$$



$$sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=frac1a,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1)$$
A lot of relationships with other series and/or functions can be found in : http://functions.wolfram.com/HypergeometricFunctions/Hypergeometric3F2/



Also $sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k = frac1Gamma(1-a)sum_k=1^n-1 fracGamma(k+1-a)k!k $ can be expressed in term of hypergeometric function.



With the help of WolframAlpha :



enter image description here



Replacing $x$ by $(1-a)$ and changing $n$ to $n-1$ leads to :
$$sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k= -fracGamma(n+1-a)Gamma(1-a)n^2(n-1)!,_3F_2(1,n,n+1-a;n+1,n+1;1) - fracGamma(2-a)Gamma(1-a)(1-a)(psi(a)+gamma).$$



$$gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k= -fracGamma(n+1-a)Gamma(1-a)n^2(n-1)!,_3F_2(1,n,n+1-a;n+1,n+1;1).$$



$$frac-n!(1-a)_nleft(gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k right) = frac1n,_3F_2(1,n,n+1-a;n+1,n+1;1) $$
And with the relationship between the two hypergeometric functions at argument=$1$ :
$$,_3F_2(1,n,n+1-a;n+1,n+1;1) = fracna,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1) tag 1$$
$$frac-n!(1-a)_nleft(gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k right) =frac1a,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1) $$
With the relationship found above $sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=frac1a,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1)$ one obtains :



$$sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=frac-n!(1-a)_nleft(gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k right)$$
which is the expected result.



Note : The most likely the relation (1) can be found in the literature. But I found no reference with only a too short search. On the other hand, my attempt to prove it analytically is not sufficiently rigorous to publish it.






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • I've scanned the 92 formulas I've on Wolfram's site for the $_3F_2$ evaluated at 1. I've looked only for form: digamma + finite sum. None of the Wolfram equations are like that. It doesn't mean one of those formulas doesn't contain (C), but it may it will take some more work. I'll dig into this approach when I get some more time.
    – skbmoore
    Aug 23 at 16:33










  • See the addition to my previous answer.
    – JJacquelin
    Aug 25 at 11:21










  • Very nice to relate the RHS also to a 3F2. It would have taken me a very long time to come up with this solution. Thanks for your persistence.
    – skbmoore
    Aug 26 at 16:07










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2891703%2fshow-sum-k-0-infty-frac1ka-binomnkk-frac-n1-a-n-big%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
2
down vote



accepted










The sum is an hypergeometric series :
$$sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=sum_k=0^infty fracn!k!(k+a)(k+n)!=n!sum_k=0^infty fracGamma(k+1)(k+a)Gamma(n+k+1) $$
From the properties of the Hypergeometric function : http://mathworld.wolfram.com/HypergeometricFunction.html
$$_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;x)=sum_k=0^infty fracGamma(k+1)Gamma(k+1)Gamma(k+a)Gamma(a+1)Gamma(n+1)Gamma(1)Gamma(1)Gamma(a)Gamma(k+a+1)Gamma(k+n+1)fracx^kk! \=a:n!sum_k=0^infty fracGamma(k+1)(k+a)Gamma(k+n+1)x^k$$
With $x=1$ :



$$sum_k=0^infty fracGamma(k+1)(k+a)Gamma(k+n+1)=frac1an!,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1)$$



$$sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=frac1a,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1)$$
A lot of relationships with other series and/or functions can be found in : http://functions.wolfram.com/HypergeometricFunctions/Hypergeometric3F2/



Also $sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k = frac1Gamma(1-a)sum_k=1^n-1 fracGamma(k+1-a)k!k $ can be expressed in term of hypergeometric function.



With the help of WolframAlpha :



enter image description here



Replacing $x$ by $(1-a)$ and changing $n$ to $n-1$ leads to :
$$sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k= -fracGamma(n+1-a)Gamma(1-a)n^2(n-1)!,_3F_2(1,n,n+1-a;n+1,n+1;1) - fracGamma(2-a)Gamma(1-a)(1-a)(psi(a)+gamma).$$



$$gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k= -fracGamma(n+1-a)Gamma(1-a)n^2(n-1)!,_3F_2(1,n,n+1-a;n+1,n+1;1).$$



$$frac-n!(1-a)_nleft(gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k right) = frac1n,_3F_2(1,n,n+1-a;n+1,n+1;1) $$
And with the relationship between the two hypergeometric functions at argument=$1$ :
$$,_3F_2(1,n,n+1-a;n+1,n+1;1) = fracna,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1) tag 1$$
$$frac-n!(1-a)_nleft(gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k right) =frac1a,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1) $$
With the relationship found above $sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=frac1a,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1)$ one obtains :



$$sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=frac-n!(1-a)_nleft(gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k right)$$
which is the expected result.



Note : The most likely the relation (1) can be found in the literature. But I found no reference with only a too short search. On the other hand, my attempt to prove it analytically is not sufficiently rigorous to publish it.






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • I've scanned the 92 formulas I've on Wolfram's site for the $_3F_2$ evaluated at 1. I've looked only for form: digamma + finite sum. None of the Wolfram equations are like that. It doesn't mean one of those formulas doesn't contain (C), but it may it will take some more work. I'll dig into this approach when I get some more time.
    – skbmoore
    Aug 23 at 16:33










  • See the addition to my previous answer.
    – JJacquelin
    Aug 25 at 11:21










  • Very nice to relate the RHS also to a 3F2. It would have taken me a very long time to come up with this solution. Thanks for your persistence.
    – skbmoore
    Aug 26 at 16:07














up vote
2
down vote



accepted










The sum is an hypergeometric series :
$$sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=sum_k=0^infty fracn!k!(k+a)(k+n)!=n!sum_k=0^infty fracGamma(k+1)(k+a)Gamma(n+k+1) $$
From the properties of the Hypergeometric function : http://mathworld.wolfram.com/HypergeometricFunction.html
$$_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;x)=sum_k=0^infty fracGamma(k+1)Gamma(k+1)Gamma(k+a)Gamma(a+1)Gamma(n+1)Gamma(1)Gamma(1)Gamma(a)Gamma(k+a+1)Gamma(k+n+1)fracx^kk! \=a:n!sum_k=0^infty fracGamma(k+1)(k+a)Gamma(k+n+1)x^k$$
With $x=1$ :



$$sum_k=0^infty fracGamma(k+1)(k+a)Gamma(k+n+1)=frac1an!,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1)$$



$$sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=frac1a,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1)$$
A lot of relationships with other series and/or functions can be found in : http://functions.wolfram.com/HypergeometricFunctions/Hypergeometric3F2/



Also $sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k = frac1Gamma(1-a)sum_k=1^n-1 fracGamma(k+1-a)k!k $ can be expressed in term of hypergeometric function.



With the help of WolframAlpha :



enter image description here



Replacing $x$ by $(1-a)$ and changing $n$ to $n-1$ leads to :
$$sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k= -fracGamma(n+1-a)Gamma(1-a)n^2(n-1)!,_3F_2(1,n,n+1-a;n+1,n+1;1) - fracGamma(2-a)Gamma(1-a)(1-a)(psi(a)+gamma).$$



$$gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k= -fracGamma(n+1-a)Gamma(1-a)n^2(n-1)!,_3F_2(1,n,n+1-a;n+1,n+1;1).$$



$$frac-n!(1-a)_nleft(gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k right) = frac1n,_3F_2(1,n,n+1-a;n+1,n+1;1) $$
And with the relationship between the two hypergeometric functions at argument=$1$ :
$$,_3F_2(1,n,n+1-a;n+1,n+1;1) = fracna,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1) tag 1$$
$$frac-n!(1-a)_nleft(gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k right) =frac1a,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1) $$
With the relationship found above $sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=frac1a,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1)$ one obtains :



$$sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=frac-n!(1-a)_nleft(gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k right)$$
which is the expected result.



Note : The most likely the relation (1) can be found in the literature. But I found no reference with only a too short search. On the other hand, my attempt to prove it analytically is not sufficiently rigorous to publish it.






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • I've scanned the 92 formulas I've on Wolfram's site for the $_3F_2$ evaluated at 1. I've looked only for form: digamma + finite sum. None of the Wolfram equations are like that. It doesn't mean one of those formulas doesn't contain (C), but it may it will take some more work. I'll dig into this approach when I get some more time.
    – skbmoore
    Aug 23 at 16:33










  • See the addition to my previous answer.
    – JJacquelin
    Aug 25 at 11:21










  • Very nice to relate the RHS also to a 3F2. It would have taken me a very long time to come up with this solution. Thanks for your persistence.
    – skbmoore
    Aug 26 at 16:07












up vote
2
down vote



accepted







up vote
2
down vote



accepted






The sum is an hypergeometric series :
$$sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=sum_k=0^infty fracn!k!(k+a)(k+n)!=n!sum_k=0^infty fracGamma(k+1)(k+a)Gamma(n+k+1) $$
From the properties of the Hypergeometric function : http://mathworld.wolfram.com/HypergeometricFunction.html
$$_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;x)=sum_k=0^infty fracGamma(k+1)Gamma(k+1)Gamma(k+a)Gamma(a+1)Gamma(n+1)Gamma(1)Gamma(1)Gamma(a)Gamma(k+a+1)Gamma(k+n+1)fracx^kk! \=a:n!sum_k=0^infty fracGamma(k+1)(k+a)Gamma(k+n+1)x^k$$
With $x=1$ :



$$sum_k=0^infty fracGamma(k+1)(k+a)Gamma(k+n+1)=frac1an!,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1)$$



$$sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=frac1a,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1)$$
A lot of relationships with other series and/or functions can be found in : http://functions.wolfram.com/HypergeometricFunctions/Hypergeometric3F2/



Also $sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k = frac1Gamma(1-a)sum_k=1^n-1 fracGamma(k+1-a)k!k $ can be expressed in term of hypergeometric function.



With the help of WolframAlpha :



enter image description here



Replacing $x$ by $(1-a)$ and changing $n$ to $n-1$ leads to :
$$sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k= -fracGamma(n+1-a)Gamma(1-a)n^2(n-1)!,_3F_2(1,n,n+1-a;n+1,n+1;1) - fracGamma(2-a)Gamma(1-a)(1-a)(psi(a)+gamma).$$



$$gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k= -fracGamma(n+1-a)Gamma(1-a)n^2(n-1)!,_3F_2(1,n,n+1-a;n+1,n+1;1).$$



$$frac-n!(1-a)_nleft(gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k right) = frac1n,_3F_2(1,n,n+1-a;n+1,n+1;1) $$
And with the relationship between the two hypergeometric functions at argument=$1$ :
$$,_3F_2(1,n,n+1-a;n+1,n+1;1) = fracna,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1) tag 1$$
$$frac-n!(1-a)_nleft(gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k right) =frac1a,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1) $$
With the relationship found above $sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=frac1a,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1)$ one obtains :



$$sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=frac-n!(1-a)_nleft(gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k right)$$
which is the expected result.



Note : The most likely the relation (1) can be found in the literature. But I found no reference with only a too short search. On the other hand, my attempt to prove it analytically is not sufficiently rigorous to publish it.






share|cite|improve this answer














The sum is an hypergeometric series :
$$sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=sum_k=0^infty fracn!k!(k+a)(k+n)!=n!sum_k=0^infty fracGamma(k+1)(k+a)Gamma(n+k+1) $$
From the properties of the Hypergeometric function : http://mathworld.wolfram.com/HypergeometricFunction.html
$$_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;x)=sum_k=0^infty fracGamma(k+1)Gamma(k+1)Gamma(k+a)Gamma(a+1)Gamma(n+1)Gamma(1)Gamma(1)Gamma(a)Gamma(k+a+1)Gamma(k+n+1)fracx^kk! \=a:n!sum_k=0^infty fracGamma(k+1)(k+a)Gamma(k+n+1)x^k$$
With $x=1$ :



$$sum_k=0^infty fracGamma(k+1)(k+a)Gamma(k+n+1)=frac1an!,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1)$$



$$sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=frac1a,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1)$$
A lot of relationships with other series and/or functions can be found in : http://functions.wolfram.com/HypergeometricFunctions/Hypergeometric3F2/



Also $sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k = frac1Gamma(1-a)sum_k=1^n-1 fracGamma(k+1-a)k!k $ can be expressed in term of hypergeometric function.



With the help of WolframAlpha :



enter image description here



Replacing $x$ by $(1-a)$ and changing $n$ to $n-1$ leads to :
$$sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k= -fracGamma(n+1-a)Gamma(1-a)n^2(n-1)!,_3F_2(1,n,n+1-a;n+1,n+1;1) - fracGamma(2-a)Gamma(1-a)(1-a)(psi(a)+gamma).$$



$$gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k= -fracGamma(n+1-a)Gamma(1-a)n^2(n-1)!,_3F_2(1,n,n+1-a;n+1,n+1;1).$$



$$frac-n!(1-a)_nleft(gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k right) = frac1n,_3F_2(1,n,n+1-a;n+1,n+1;1) $$
And with the relationship between the two hypergeometric functions at argument=$1$ :
$$,_3F_2(1,n,n+1-a;n+1,n+1;1) = fracna,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1) tag 1$$
$$frac-n!(1-a)_nleft(gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k right) =frac1a,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1) $$
With the relationship found above $sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=frac1a,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1)$ one obtains :



$$sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=frac-n!(1-a)_nleft(gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k right)$$
which is the expected result.



Note : The most likely the relation (1) can be found in the literature. But I found no reference with only a too short search. On the other hand, my attempt to prove it analytically is not sufficiently rigorous to publish it.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Aug 25 at 11:29

























answered Aug 23 at 10:18









JJacquelin

40.6k21650




40.6k21650











  • I've scanned the 92 formulas I've on Wolfram's site for the $_3F_2$ evaluated at 1. I've looked only for form: digamma + finite sum. None of the Wolfram equations are like that. It doesn't mean one of those formulas doesn't contain (C), but it may it will take some more work. I'll dig into this approach when I get some more time.
    – skbmoore
    Aug 23 at 16:33










  • See the addition to my previous answer.
    – JJacquelin
    Aug 25 at 11:21










  • Very nice to relate the RHS also to a 3F2. It would have taken me a very long time to come up with this solution. Thanks for your persistence.
    – skbmoore
    Aug 26 at 16:07
















  • I've scanned the 92 formulas I've on Wolfram's site for the $_3F_2$ evaluated at 1. I've looked only for form: digamma + finite sum. None of the Wolfram equations are like that. It doesn't mean one of those formulas doesn't contain (C), but it may it will take some more work. I'll dig into this approach when I get some more time.
    – skbmoore
    Aug 23 at 16:33










  • See the addition to my previous answer.
    – JJacquelin
    Aug 25 at 11:21










  • Very nice to relate the RHS also to a 3F2. It would have taken me a very long time to come up with this solution. Thanks for your persistence.
    – skbmoore
    Aug 26 at 16:07















I've scanned the 92 formulas I've on Wolfram's site for the $_3F_2$ evaluated at 1. I've looked only for form: digamma + finite sum. None of the Wolfram equations are like that. It doesn't mean one of those formulas doesn't contain (C), but it may it will take some more work. I'll dig into this approach when I get some more time.
– skbmoore
Aug 23 at 16:33




I've scanned the 92 formulas I've on Wolfram's site for the $_3F_2$ evaluated at 1. I've looked only for form: digamma + finite sum. None of the Wolfram equations are like that. It doesn't mean one of those formulas doesn't contain (C), but it may it will take some more work. I'll dig into this approach when I get some more time.
– skbmoore
Aug 23 at 16:33












See the addition to my previous answer.
– JJacquelin
Aug 25 at 11:21




See the addition to my previous answer.
– JJacquelin
Aug 25 at 11:21












Very nice to relate the RHS also to a 3F2. It would have taken me a very long time to come up with this solution. Thanks for your persistence.
– skbmoore
Aug 26 at 16:07




Very nice to relate the RHS also to a 3F2. It would have taken me a very long time to come up with this solution. Thanks for your persistence.
– skbmoore
Aug 26 at 16:07

















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2891703%2fshow-sum-k-0-infty-frac1ka-binomnkk-frac-n1-a-n-big%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

Mutual Information Always Non-negative

Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?