Show $sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=frac-,n!(1-a)_nBig(gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1frac1kfrac(1-a)_kk!Big)$
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
The conjectured identity of the title,
$$(C)quadsum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=frac-,n!(1-a)_nBig(gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1frac1kfrac(1-a)_kk!Big)$$
arose in an attempt to generalize a specific case of this identity for $a=1/2.$ (The symbol $(a)_k$ is the Pochhammer symbol.) The specific identity I proved was
$$sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+1/2)binomn+kk=fracn!(1/2)_n sum_k=n^infty frac1k frac(1/2)_kk!=frac2^2nbinom2nnbig(2log2 - sum_k=1^n-1frac2^-2kkbinom2kkbig)$$
This form is suggestive of $(C),$ for we can sum from 1 to $infty$ and subtract the series tail and use the known summation,
$$sum_k=1^infty frac1k frac(1-a)_kk!=-gamma - psi(a),$$
the two terms being Euler's constant and the digamma function, respectively. The proof I prefer is one that doesn't require a knowledge of the RHS of $(C).$ For example, I'd prefer not to have it shown that both sides obey the same recursion relationship with a boundary condition.
sequences-and-series special-functions
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
The conjectured identity of the title,
$$(C)quadsum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=frac-,n!(1-a)_nBig(gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1frac1kfrac(1-a)_kk!Big)$$
arose in an attempt to generalize a specific case of this identity for $a=1/2.$ (The symbol $(a)_k$ is the Pochhammer symbol.) The specific identity I proved was
$$sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+1/2)binomn+kk=fracn!(1/2)_n sum_k=n^infty frac1k frac(1/2)_kk!=frac2^2nbinom2nnbig(2log2 - sum_k=1^n-1frac2^-2kkbinom2kkbig)$$
This form is suggestive of $(C),$ for we can sum from 1 to $infty$ and subtract the series tail and use the known summation,
$$sum_k=1^infty frac1k frac(1-a)_kk!=-gamma - psi(a),$$
the two terms being Euler's constant and the digamma function, respectively. The proof I prefer is one that doesn't require a knowledge of the RHS of $(C).$ For example, I'd prefer not to have it shown that both sides obey the same recursion relationship with a boundary condition.
sequences-and-series special-functions
It seems simpler to ask for proofs of the equivalent identities $$sum_k=0^infty frack!(k+a),(n+k)!=frac1(1-a)_nsum_k=n^inftyfrac(1-a)_kk,k!$$
â Did
Aug 23 at 6:09
1
Isn't it enough to check that both the RHS and the LHS have the same residues at the simple poles $a=0, a=-1,ldots, a=-n$?
â Jack D'Aurizioâ¦
Aug 23 at 14:49
Hello Jack. This might be a valid approach, but can you do it without knowing the RHS of the equation?
â skbmoore
Aug 26 at 16:09
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
The conjectured identity of the title,
$$(C)quadsum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=frac-,n!(1-a)_nBig(gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1frac1kfrac(1-a)_kk!Big)$$
arose in an attempt to generalize a specific case of this identity for $a=1/2.$ (The symbol $(a)_k$ is the Pochhammer symbol.) The specific identity I proved was
$$sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+1/2)binomn+kk=fracn!(1/2)_n sum_k=n^infty frac1k frac(1/2)_kk!=frac2^2nbinom2nnbig(2log2 - sum_k=1^n-1frac2^-2kkbinom2kkbig)$$
This form is suggestive of $(C),$ for we can sum from 1 to $infty$ and subtract the series tail and use the known summation,
$$sum_k=1^infty frac1k frac(1-a)_kk!=-gamma - psi(a),$$
the two terms being Euler's constant and the digamma function, respectively. The proof I prefer is one that doesn't require a knowledge of the RHS of $(C).$ For example, I'd prefer not to have it shown that both sides obey the same recursion relationship with a boundary condition.
sequences-and-series special-functions
The conjectured identity of the title,
$$(C)quadsum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=frac-,n!(1-a)_nBig(gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1frac1kfrac(1-a)_kk!Big)$$
arose in an attempt to generalize a specific case of this identity for $a=1/2.$ (The symbol $(a)_k$ is the Pochhammer symbol.) The specific identity I proved was
$$sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+1/2)binomn+kk=fracn!(1/2)_n sum_k=n^infty frac1k frac(1/2)_kk!=frac2^2nbinom2nnbig(2log2 - sum_k=1^n-1frac2^-2kkbinom2kkbig)$$
This form is suggestive of $(C),$ for we can sum from 1 to $infty$ and subtract the series tail and use the known summation,
$$sum_k=1^infty frac1k frac(1-a)_kk!=-gamma - psi(a),$$
the two terms being Euler's constant and the digamma function, respectively. The proof I prefer is one that doesn't require a knowledge of the RHS of $(C).$ For example, I'd prefer not to have it shown that both sides obey the same recursion relationship with a boundary condition.
sequences-and-series special-functions
asked Aug 23 at 4:41
skbmoore
1,31729
1,31729
It seems simpler to ask for proofs of the equivalent identities $$sum_k=0^infty frack!(k+a),(n+k)!=frac1(1-a)_nsum_k=n^inftyfrac(1-a)_kk,k!$$
â Did
Aug 23 at 6:09
1
Isn't it enough to check that both the RHS and the LHS have the same residues at the simple poles $a=0, a=-1,ldots, a=-n$?
â Jack D'Aurizioâ¦
Aug 23 at 14:49
Hello Jack. This might be a valid approach, but can you do it without knowing the RHS of the equation?
â skbmoore
Aug 26 at 16:09
add a comment |Â
It seems simpler to ask for proofs of the equivalent identities $$sum_k=0^infty frack!(k+a),(n+k)!=frac1(1-a)_nsum_k=n^inftyfrac(1-a)_kk,k!$$
â Did
Aug 23 at 6:09
1
Isn't it enough to check that both the RHS and the LHS have the same residues at the simple poles $a=0, a=-1,ldots, a=-n$?
â Jack D'Aurizioâ¦
Aug 23 at 14:49
Hello Jack. This might be a valid approach, but can you do it without knowing the RHS of the equation?
â skbmoore
Aug 26 at 16:09
It seems simpler to ask for proofs of the equivalent identities $$sum_k=0^infty frack!(k+a),(n+k)!=frac1(1-a)_nsum_k=n^inftyfrac(1-a)_kk,k!$$
â Did
Aug 23 at 6:09
It seems simpler to ask for proofs of the equivalent identities $$sum_k=0^infty frack!(k+a),(n+k)!=frac1(1-a)_nsum_k=n^inftyfrac(1-a)_kk,k!$$
â Did
Aug 23 at 6:09
1
1
Isn't it enough to check that both the RHS and the LHS have the same residues at the simple poles $a=0, a=-1,ldots, a=-n$?
â Jack D'Aurizioâ¦
Aug 23 at 14:49
Isn't it enough to check that both the RHS and the LHS have the same residues at the simple poles $a=0, a=-1,ldots, a=-n$?
â Jack D'Aurizioâ¦
Aug 23 at 14:49
Hello Jack. This might be a valid approach, but can you do it without knowing the RHS of the equation?
â skbmoore
Aug 26 at 16:09
Hello Jack. This might be a valid approach, but can you do it without knowing the RHS of the equation?
â skbmoore
Aug 26 at 16:09
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
The sum is an hypergeometric series :
$$sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=sum_k=0^infty fracn!k!(k+a)(k+n)!=n!sum_k=0^infty fracGamma(k+1)(k+a)Gamma(n+k+1) $$
From the properties of the Hypergeometric function : http://mathworld.wolfram.com/HypergeometricFunction.html
$$_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;x)=sum_k=0^infty fracGamma(k+1)Gamma(k+1)Gamma(k+a)Gamma(a+1)Gamma(n+1)Gamma(1)Gamma(1)Gamma(a)Gamma(k+a+1)Gamma(k+n+1)fracx^kk! \=a:n!sum_k=0^infty fracGamma(k+1)(k+a)Gamma(k+n+1)x^k$$
With $x=1$ :
$$sum_k=0^infty fracGamma(k+1)(k+a)Gamma(k+n+1)=frac1an!,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1)$$
$$sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=frac1a,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1)$$
A lot of relationships with other series and/or functions can be found in : http://functions.wolfram.com/HypergeometricFunctions/Hypergeometric3F2/
Also $sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k = frac1Gamma(1-a)sum_k=1^n-1 fracGamma(k+1-a)k!k $ can be expressed in term of hypergeometric function.
With the help of WolframAlpha :
Replacing $x$ by $(1-a)$ and changing $n$ to $n-1$ leads to :
$$sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k= -fracGamma(n+1-a)Gamma(1-a)n^2(n-1)!,_3F_2(1,n,n+1-a;n+1,n+1;1) - fracGamma(2-a)Gamma(1-a)(1-a)(psi(a)+gamma).$$
$$gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k= -fracGamma(n+1-a)Gamma(1-a)n^2(n-1)!,_3F_2(1,n,n+1-a;n+1,n+1;1).$$
$$frac-n!(1-a)_nleft(gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k right) = frac1n,_3F_2(1,n,n+1-a;n+1,n+1;1) $$
And with the relationship between the two hypergeometric functions at argument=$1$ :
$$,_3F_2(1,n,n+1-a;n+1,n+1;1) = fracna,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1) tag 1$$
$$frac-n!(1-a)_nleft(gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k right) =frac1a,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1) $$
With the relationship found above $sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=frac1a,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1)$ one obtains :
$$sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=frac-n!(1-a)_nleft(gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k right)$$
which is the expected result.
Note : The most likely the relation (1) can be found in the literature. But I found no reference with only a too short search. On the other hand, my attempt to prove it analytically is not sufficiently rigorous to publish it.
I've scanned the 92 formulas I've on Wolfram's site for the $_3F_2$ evaluated at 1. I've looked only for form: digamma + finite sum. None of the Wolfram equations are like that. It doesn't mean one of those formulas doesn't contain (C), but it may it will take some more work. I'll dig into this approach when I get some more time.
â skbmoore
Aug 23 at 16:33
See the addition to my previous answer.
â JJacquelin
Aug 25 at 11:21
Very nice to relate the RHS also to a 3F2. It would have taken me a very long time to come up with this solution. Thanks for your persistence.
â skbmoore
Aug 26 at 16:07
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
The sum is an hypergeometric series :
$$sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=sum_k=0^infty fracn!k!(k+a)(k+n)!=n!sum_k=0^infty fracGamma(k+1)(k+a)Gamma(n+k+1) $$
From the properties of the Hypergeometric function : http://mathworld.wolfram.com/HypergeometricFunction.html
$$_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;x)=sum_k=0^infty fracGamma(k+1)Gamma(k+1)Gamma(k+a)Gamma(a+1)Gamma(n+1)Gamma(1)Gamma(1)Gamma(a)Gamma(k+a+1)Gamma(k+n+1)fracx^kk! \=a:n!sum_k=0^infty fracGamma(k+1)(k+a)Gamma(k+n+1)x^k$$
With $x=1$ :
$$sum_k=0^infty fracGamma(k+1)(k+a)Gamma(k+n+1)=frac1an!,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1)$$
$$sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=frac1a,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1)$$
A lot of relationships with other series and/or functions can be found in : http://functions.wolfram.com/HypergeometricFunctions/Hypergeometric3F2/
Also $sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k = frac1Gamma(1-a)sum_k=1^n-1 fracGamma(k+1-a)k!k $ can be expressed in term of hypergeometric function.
With the help of WolframAlpha :
Replacing $x$ by $(1-a)$ and changing $n$ to $n-1$ leads to :
$$sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k= -fracGamma(n+1-a)Gamma(1-a)n^2(n-1)!,_3F_2(1,n,n+1-a;n+1,n+1;1) - fracGamma(2-a)Gamma(1-a)(1-a)(psi(a)+gamma).$$
$$gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k= -fracGamma(n+1-a)Gamma(1-a)n^2(n-1)!,_3F_2(1,n,n+1-a;n+1,n+1;1).$$
$$frac-n!(1-a)_nleft(gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k right) = frac1n,_3F_2(1,n,n+1-a;n+1,n+1;1) $$
And with the relationship between the two hypergeometric functions at argument=$1$ :
$$,_3F_2(1,n,n+1-a;n+1,n+1;1) = fracna,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1) tag 1$$
$$frac-n!(1-a)_nleft(gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k right) =frac1a,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1) $$
With the relationship found above $sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=frac1a,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1)$ one obtains :
$$sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=frac-n!(1-a)_nleft(gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k right)$$
which is the expected result.
Note : The most likely the relation (1) can be found in the literature. But I found no reference with only a too short search. On the other hand, my attempt to prove it analytically is not sufficiently rigorous to publish it.
I've scanned the 92 formulas I've on Wolfram's site for the $_3F_2$ evaluated at 1. I've looked only for form: digamma + finite sum. None of the Wolfram equations are like that. It doesn't mean one of those formulas doesn't contain (C), but it may it will take some more work. I'll dig into this approach when I get some more time.
â skbmoore
Aug 23 at 16:33
See the addition to my previous answer.
â JJacquelin
Aug 25 at 11:21
Very nice to relate the RHS also to a 3F2. It would have taken me a very long time to come up with this solution. Thanks for your persistence.
â skbmoore
Aug 26 at 16:07
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
The sum is an hypergeometric series :
$$sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=sum_k=0^infty fracn!k!(k+a)(k+n)!=n!sum_k=0^infty fracGamma(k+1)(k+a)Gamma(n+k+1) $$
From the properties of the Hypergeometric function : http://mathworld.wolfram.com/HypergeometricFunction.html
$$_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;x)=sum_k=0^infty fracGamma(k+1)Gamma(k+1)Gamma(k+a)Gamma(a+1)Gamma(n+1)Gamma(1)Gamma(1)Gamma(a)Gamma(k+a+1)Gamma(k+n+1)fracx^kk! \=a:n!sum_k=0^infty fracGamma(k+1)(k+a)Gamma(k+n+1)x^k$$
With $x=1$ :
$$sum_k=0^infty fracGamma(k+1)(k+a)Gamma(k+n+1)=frac1an!,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1)$$
$$sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=frac1a,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1)$$
A lot of relationships with other series and/or functions can be found in : http://functions.wolfram.com/HypergeometricFunctions/Hypergeometric3F2/
Also $sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k = frac1Gamma(1-a)sum_k=1^n-1 fracGamma(k+1-a)k!k $ can be expressed in term of hypergeometric function.
With the help of WolframAlpha :
Replacing $x$ by $(1-a)$ and changing $n$ to $n-1$ leads to :
$$sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k= -fracGamma(n+1-a)Gamma(1-a)n^2(n-1)!,_3F_2(1,n,n+1-a;n+1,n+1;1) - fracGamma(2-a)Gamma(1-a)(1-a)(psi(a)+gamma).$$
$$gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k= -fracGamma(n+1-a)Gamma(1-a)n^2(n-1)!,_3F_2(1,n,n+1-a;n+1,n+1;1).$$
$$frac-n!(1-a)_nleft(gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k right) = frac1n,_3F_2(1,n,n+1-a;n+1,n+1;1) $$
And with the relationship between the two hypergeometric functions at argument=$1$ :
$$,_3F_2(1,n,n+1-a;n+1,n+1;1) = fracna,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1) tag 1$$
$$frac-n!(1-a)_nleft(gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k right) =frac1a,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1) $$
With the relationship found above $sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=frac1a,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1)$ one obtains :
$$sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=frac-n!(1-a)_nleft(gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k right)$$
which is the expected result.
Note : The most likely the relation (1) can be found in the literature. But I found no reference with only a too short search. On the other hand, my attempt to prove it analytically is not sufficiently rigorous to publish it.
I've scanned the 92 formulas I've on Wolfram's site for the $_3F_2$ evaluated at 1. I've looked only for form: digamma + finite sum. None of the Wolfram equations are like that. It doesn't mean one of those formulas doesn't contain (C), but it may it will take some more work. I'll dig into this approach when I get some more time.
â skbmoore
Aug 23 at 16:33
See the addition to my previous answer.
â JJacquelin
Aug 25 at 11:21
Very nice to relate the RHS also to a 3F2. It would have taken me a very long time to come up with this solution. Thanks for your persistence.
â skbmoore
Aug 26 at 16:07
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
The sum is an hypergeometric series :
$$sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=sum_k=0^infty fracn!k!(k+a)(k+n)!=n!sum_k=0^infty fracGamma(k+1)(k+a)Gamma(n+k+1) $$
From the properties of the Hypergeometric function : http://mathworld.wolfram.com/HypergeometricFunction.html
$$_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;x)=sum_k=0^infty fracGamma(k+1)Gamma(k+1)Gamma(k+a)Gamma(a+1)Gamma(n+1)Gamma(1)Gamma(1)Gamma(a)Gamma(k+a+1)Gamma(k+n+1)fracx^kk! \=a:n!sum_k=0^infty fracGamma(k+1)(k+a)Gamma(k+n+1)x^k$$
With $x=1$ :
$$sum_k=0^infty fracGamma(k+1)(k+a)Gamma(k+n+1)=frac1an!,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1)$$
$$sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=frac1a,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1)$$
A lot of relationships with other series and/or functions can be found in : http://functions.wolfram.com/HypergeometricFunctions/Hypergeometric3F2/
Also $sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k = frac1Gamma(1-a)sum_k=1^n-1 fracGamma(k+1-a)k!k $ can be expressed in term of hypergeometric function.
With the help of WolframAlpha :
Replacing $x$ by $(1-a)$ and changing $n$ to $n-1$ leads to :
$$sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k= -fracGamma(n+1-a)Gamma(1-a)n^2(n-1)!,_3F_2(1,n,n+1-a;n+1,n+1;1) - fracGamma(2-a)Gamma(1-a)(1-a)(psi(a)+gamma).$$
$$gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k= -fracGamma(n+1-a)Gamma(1-a)n^2(n-1)!,_3F_2(1,n,n+1-a;n+1,n+1;1).$$
$$frac-n!(1-a)_nleft(gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k right) = frac1n,_3F_2(1,n,n+1-a;n+1,n+1;1) $$
And with the relationship between the two hypergeometric functions at argument=$1$ :
$$,_3F_2(1,n,n+1-a;n+1,n+1;1) = fracna,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1) tag 1$$
$$frac-n!(1-a)_nleft(gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k right) =frac1a,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1) $$
With the relationship found above $sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=frac1a,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1)$ one obtains :
$$sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=frac-n!(1-a)_nleft(gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k right)$$
which is the expected result.
Note : The most likely the relation (1) can be found in the literature. But I found no reference with only a too short search. On the other hand, my attempt to prove it analytically is not sufficiently rigorous to publish it.
The sum is an hypergeometric series :
$$sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=sum_k=0^infty fracn!k!(k+a)(k+n)!=n!sum_k=0^infty fracGamma(k+1)(k+a)Gamma(n+k+1) $$
From the properties of the Hypergeometric function : http://mathworld.wolfram.com/HypergeometricFunction.html
$$_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;x)=sum_k=0^infty fracGamma(k+1)Gamma(k+1)Gamma(k+a)Gamma(a+1)Gamma(n+1)Gamma(1)Gamma(1)Gamma(a)Gamma(k+a+1)Gamma(k+n+1)fracx^kk! \=a:n!sum_k=0^infty fracGamma(k+1)(k+a)Gamma(k+n+1)x^k$$
With $x=1$ :
$$sum_k=0^infty fracGamma(k+1)(k+a)Gamma(k+n+1)=frac1an!,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1)$$
$$sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=frac1a,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1)$$
A lot of relationships with other series and/or functions can be found in : http://functions.wolfram.com/HypergeometricFunctions/Hypergeometric3F2/
Also $sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k = frac1Gamma(1-a)sum_k=1^n-1 fracGamma(k+1-a)k!k $ can be expressed in term of hypergeometric function.
With the help of WolframAlpha :
Replacing $x$ by $(1-a)$ and changing $n$ to $n-1$ leads to :
$$sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k= -fracGamma(n+1-a)Gamma(1-a)n^2(n-1)!,_3F_2(1,n,n+1-a;n+1,n+1;1) - fracGamma(2-a)Gamma(1-a)(1-a)(psi(a)+gamma).$$
$$gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k= -fracGamma(n+1-a)Gamma(1-a)n^2(n-1)!,_3F_2(1,n,n+1-a;n+1,n+1;1).$$
$$frac-n!(1-a)_nleft(gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k right) = frac1n,_3F_2(1,n,n+1-a;n+1,n+1;1) $$
And with the relationship between the two hypergeometric functions at argument=$1$ :
$$,_3F_2(1,n,n+1-a;n+1,n+1;1) = fracna,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1) tag 1$$
$$frac-n!(1-a)_nleft(gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k right) =frac1a,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1) $$
With the relationship found above $sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=frac1a,_3F_2(1,1,a;a+1,n+1;1)$ one obtains :
$$sum_k=0^infty frac1(k+a)binomn+kk=frac-n!(1-a)_nleft(gamma+psi(a)+sum_k=1^n-1 frac(1-a)_kk!k right)$$
which is the expected result.
Note : The most likely the relation (1) can be found in the literature. But I found no reference with only a too short search. On the other hand, my attempt to prove it analytically is not sufficiently rigorous to publish it.
edited Aug 25 at 11:29
answered Aug 23 at 10:18
JJacquelin
40.6k21650
40.6k21650
I've scanned the 92 formulas I've on Wolfram's site for the $_3F_2$ evaluated at 1. I've looked only for form: digamma + finite sum. None of the Wolfram equations are like that. It doesn't mean one of those formulas doesn't contain (C), but it may it will take some more work. I'll dig into this approach when I get some more time.
â skbmoore
Aug 23 at 16:33
See the addition to my previous answer.
â JJacquelin
Aug 25 at 11:21
Very nice to relate the RHS also to a 3F2. It would have taken me a very long time to come up with this solution. Thanks for your persistence.
â skbmoore
Aug 26 at 16:07
add a comment |Â
I've scanned the 92 formulas I've on Wolfram's site for the $_3F_2$ evaluated at 1. I've looked only for form: digamma + finite sum. None of the Wolfram equations are like that. It doesn't mean one of those formulas doesn't contain (C), but it may it will take some more work. I'll dig into this approach when I get some more time.
â skbmoore
Aug 23 at 16:33
See the addition to my previous answer.
â JJacquelin
Aug 25 at 11:21
Very nice to relate the RHS also to a 3F2. It would have taken me a very long time to come up with this solution. Thanks for your persistence.
â skbmoore
Aug 26 at 16:07
I've scanned the 92 formulas I've on Wolfram's site for the $_3F_2$ evaluated at 1. I've looked only for form: digamma + finite sum. None of the Wolfram equations are like that. It doesn't mean one of those formulas doesn't contain (C), but it may it will take some more work. I'll dig into this approach when I get some more time.
â skbmoore
Aug 23 at 16:33
I've scanned the 92 formulas I've on Wolfram's site for the $_3F_2$ evaluated at 1. I've looked only for form: digamma + finite sum. None of the Wolfram equations are like that. It doesn't mean one of those formulas doesn't contain (C), but it may it will take some more work. I'll dig into this approach when I get some more time.
â skbmoore
Aug 23 at 16:33
See the addition to my previous answer.
â JJacquelin
Aug 25 at 11:21
See the addition to my previous answer.
â JJacquelin
Aug 25 at 11:21
Very nice to relate the RHS also to a 3F2. It would have taken me a very long time to come up with this solution. Thanks for your persistence.
â skbmoore
Aug 26 at 16:07
Very nice to relate the RHS also to a 3F2. It would have taken me a very long time to come up with this solution. Thanks for your persistence.
â skbmoore
Aug 26 at 16:07
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2891703%2fshow-sum-k-0-infty-frac1ka-binomnkk-frac-n1-a-n-big%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
It seems simpler to ask for proofs of the equivalent identities $$sum_k=0^infty frack!(k+a),(n+k)!=frac1(1-a)_nsum_k=n^inftyfrac(1-a)_kk,k!$$
â Did
Aug 23 at 6:09
1
Isn't it enough to check that both the RHS and the LHS have the same residues at the simple poles $a=0, a=-1,ldots, a=-n$?
â Jack D'Aurizioâ¦
Aug 23 at 14:49
Hello Jack. This might be a valid approach, but can you do it without knowing the RHS of the equation?
â skbmoore
Aug 26 at 16:09