Permutation and Symmetric Polynomials

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












Given a polynomial $f(x_1, · · · , x_n) ∈ F[x_1, · · · , x_n]$ and a permutation
$σ ∈ S_n$, I want to show that both
$prod_σ∈Sn
σ · f(x_1, · · · , x_n)$ and $sum_σ∈Sn
σ · f(x_1, · · · , x_n)$ are symmetric polynomials.



I know a symmetric polynomial is a polynomial $F(X_1, …, X_n)$ in $n$ variables, such that if any of the variables are interchanged, one obtains the same polynomial. Or P is a symmetric polynomial if for any permutation $σ$ of the subscripts $1, 2, ..., n$ one has $F(X_σ(1),…, X_σ(n)) = P(X_1,…, X_n)$. But I am not sure how to proceed in the above example.







share|cite|improve this question




















  • You can't say "given a permutation $sigmain S_n$" and then sum over $sigmain S_n$.
    – joriki
    Aug 23 at 5:49










  • Hint: for each $tau in S_n$, multiplying by $tau$ on the left is a permutation of the group $S_n$. (the proof of Cayley's theorem). This is a common trick in group theory, averaging over a group.
    – 4-ier
    Aug 23 at 6:12














up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












Given a polynomial $f(x_1, · · · , x_n) ∈ F[x_1, · · · , x_n]$ and a permutation
$σ ∈ S_n$, I want to show that both
$prod_σ∈Sn
σ · f(x_1, · · · , x_n)$ and $sum_σ∈Sn
σ · f(x_1, · · · , x_n)$ are symmetric polynomials.



I know a symmetric polynomial is a polynomial $F(X_1, …, X_n)$ in $n$ variables, such that if any of the variables are interchanged, one obtains the same polynomial. Or P is a symmetric polynomial if for any permutation $σ$ of the subscripts $1, 2, ..., n$ one has $F(X_σ(1),…, X_σ(n)) = P(X_1,…, X_n)$. But I am not sure how to proceed in the above example.







share|cite|improve this question




















  • You can't say "given a permutation $sigmain S_n$" and then sum over $sigmain S_n$.
    – joriki
    Aug 23 at 5:49










  • Hint: for each $tau in S_n$, multiplying by $tau$ on the left is a permutation of the group $S_n$. (the proof of Cayley's theorem). This is a common trick in group theory, averaging over a group.
    – 4-ier
    Aug 23 at 6:12












up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1






1





Given a polynomial $f(x_1, · · · , x_n) ∈ F[x_1, · · · , x_n]$ and a permutation
$σ ∈ S_n$, I want to show that both
$prod_σ∈Sn
σ · f(x_1, · · · , x_n)$ and $sum_σ∈Sn
σ · f(x_1, · · · , x_n)$ are symmetric polynomials.



I know a symmetric polynomial is a polynomial $F(X_1, …, X_n)$ in $n$ variables, such that if any of the variables are interchanged, one obtains the same polynomial. Or P is a symmetric polynomial if for any permutation $σ$ of the subscripts $1, 2, ..., n$ one has $F(X_σ(1),…, X_σ(n)) = P(X_1,…, X_n)$. But I am not sure how to proceed in the above example.







share|cite|improve this question












Given a polynomial $f(x_1, · · · , x_n) ∈ F[x_1, · · · , x_n]$ and a permutation
$σ ∈ S_n$, I want to show that both
$prod_σ∈Sn
σ · f(x_1, · · · , x_n)$ and $sum_σ∈Sn
σ · f(x_1, · · · , x_n)$ are symmetric polynomials.



I know a symmetric polynomial is a polynomial $F(X_1, …, X_n)$ in $n$ variables, such that if any of the variables are interchanged, one obtains the same polynomial. Or P is a symmetric polynomial if for any permutation $σ$ of the subscripts $1, 2, ..., n$ one has $F(X_σ(1),…, X_σ(n)) = P(X_1,…, X_n)$. But I am not sure how to proceed in the above example.









share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Aug 23 at 5:37









Homaniac

48019




48019











  • You can't say "given a permutation $sigmain S_n$" and then sum over $sigmain S_n$.
    – joriki
    Aug 23 at 5:49










  • Hint: for each $tau in S_n$, multiplying by $tau$ on the left is a permutation of the group $S_n$. (the proof of Cayley's theorem). This is a common trick in group theory, averaging over a group.
    – 4-ier
    Aug 23 at 6:12
















  • You can't say "given a permutation $sigmain S_n$" and then sum over $sigmain S_n$.
    – joriki
    Aug 23 at 5:49










  • Hint: for each $tau in S_n$, multiplying by $tau$ on the left is a permutation of the group $S_n$. (the proof of Cayley's theorem). This is a common trick in group theory, averaging over a group.
    – 4-ier
    Aug 23 at 6:12















You can't say "given a permutation $sigmain S_n$" and then sum over $sigmain S_n$.
– joriki
Aug 23 at 5:49




You can't say "given a permutation $sigmain S_n$" and then sum over $sigmain S_n$.
– joriki
Aug 23 at 5:49












Hint: for each $tau in S_n$, multiplying by $tau$ on the left is a permutation of the group $S_n$. (the proof of Cayley's theorem). This is a common trick in group theory, averaging over a group.
– 4-ier
Aug 23 at 6:12




Hint: for each $tau in S_n$, multiplying by $tau$ on the left is a permutation of the group $S_n$. (the proof of Cayley's theorem). This is a common trick in group theory, averaging over a group.
– 4-ier
Aug 23 at 6:12










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













A polynomial $g$ is a symmetric polynomial if $sigma g=g$ for all $sigma in S_n$.
For your case we have $g=sumlimits_tau tau(f)$. If $tau$ runs over $S_n$ then the set $sigma circ tau$ coincides with $S_n$.Then
$$
sigma(g)=sumlimits_tau sigma(tau(f))=sumlimits_tau (sigma circ tau)(f)=sumlimits_tau tau(f)=g,
$$
so $g$ is an symmetric polynomial.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Ah how about the case for product rather than sum? Is the proof the same?
    – Homaniac
    Aug 23 at 9:10










  • yes, the proof is the same
    – Leox
    Aug 23 at 9:28










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2891733%2fpermutation-and-symmetric-polynomials%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
0
down vote













A polynomial $g$ is a symmetric polynomial if $sigma g=g$ for all $sigma in S_n$.
For your case we have $g=sumlimits_tau tau(f)$. If $tau$ runs over $S_n$ then the set $sigma circ tau$ coincides with $S_n$.Then
$$
sigma(g)=sumlimits_tau sigma(tau(f))=sumlimits_tau (sigma circ tau)(f)=sumlimits_tau tau(f)=g,
$$
so $g$ is an symmetric polynomial.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Ah how about the case for product rather than sum? Is the proof the same?
    – Homaniac
    Aug 23 at 9:10










  • yes, the proof is the same
    – Leox
    Aug 23 at 9:28














up vote
0
down vote













A polynomial $g$ is a symmetric polynomial if $sigma g=g$ for all $sigma in S_n$.
For your case we have $g=sumlimits_tau tau(f)$. If $tau$ runs over $S_n$ then the set $sigma circ tau$ coincides with $S_n$.Then
$$
sigma(g)=sumlimits_tau sigma(tau(f))=sumlimits_tau (sigma circ tau)(f)=sumlimits_tau tau(f)=g,
$$
so $g$ is an symmetric polynomial.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Ah how about the case for product rather than sum? Is the proof the same?
    – Homaniac
    Aug 23 at 9:10










  • yes, the proof is the same
    – Leox
    Aug 23 at 9:28












up vote
0
down vote










up vote
0
down vote









A polynomial $g$ is a symmetric polynomial if $sigma g=g$ for all $sigma in S_n$.
For your case we have $g=sumlimits_tau tau(f)$. If $tau$ runs over $S_n$ then the set $sigma circ tau$ coincides with $S_n$.Then
$$
sigma(g)=sumlimits_tau sigma(tau(f))=sumlimits_tau (sigma circ tau)(f)=sumlimits_tau tau(f)=g,
$$
so $g$ is an symmetric polynomial.






share|cite|improve this answer












A polynomial $g$ is a symmetric polynomial if $sigma g=g$ for all $sigma in S_n$.
For your case we have $g=sumlimits_tau tau(f)$. If $tau$ runs over $S_n$ then the set $sigma circ tau$ coincides with $S_n$.Then
$$
sigma(g)=sumlimits_tau sigma(tau(f))=sumlimits_tau (sigma circ tau)(f)=sumlimits_tau tau(f)=g,
$$
so $g$ is an symmetric polynomial.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Aug 23 at 6:30









Leox

5,1141323




5,1141323











  • Ah how about the case for product rather than sum? Is the proof the same?
    – Homaniac
    Aug 23 at 9:10










  • yes, the proof is the same
    – Leox
    Aug 23 at 9:28
















  • Ah how about the case for product rather than sum? Is the proof the same?
    – Homaniac
    Aug 23 at 9:10










  • yes, the proof is the same
    – Leox
    Aug 23 at 9:28















Ah how about the case for product rather than sum? Is the proof the same?
– Homaniac
Aug 23 at 9:10




Ah how about the case for product rather than sum? Is the proof the same?
– Homaniac
Aug 23 at 9:10












yes, the proof is the same
– Leox
Aug 23 at 9:28




yes, the proof is the same
– Leox
Aug 23 at 9:28

















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2891733%2fpermutation-and-symmetric-polynomials%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

Mutual Information Always Non-negative

Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?