Calculate the operator norm defined on L2
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
For $f in L^2([0, 1]) $ and $x in [0, 1]$ we have the following
$$
A(f)(x) = int_0^1 (x - y) f(y)dy
$$
In this particular exercise I have to calculate the operator norm $| A |$.
We know that from a theorem that if $A$ is compact and self-adjoint then either $|A|$ or $-| A |$ is an eigenvalue to the operator $A$.
My attempt:
We know that $A$ is indeed compact, but it is not self-adjoint. However, by some inspection, we have that $iA$ is self-adjoint (and compact). So we just have to calculate $|iA| = |A| = |lambda|$ where $lambda$ is an eigenvalue satisfying $A(f)(x) = lambda f(x)$, for some eigenfunction $f$. Now setting $f(x) = a + bx$ we get by calculation that
$$lambda(a + bx) = int_0^1 (x - y) (a + by) dy = -frac a 2 - frac b 3 + (a + frac b 2)x.$$
But from this I'm not sure how to solve for $lambda$. Maybe there is an another way to solve this?
functional-analysis
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
For $f in L^2([0, 1]) $ and $x in [0, 1]$ we have the following
$$
A(f)(x) = int_0^1 (x - y) f(y)dy
$$
In this particular exercise I have to calculate the operator norm $| A |$.
We know that from a theorem that if $A$ is compact and self-adjoint then either $|A|$ or $-| A |$ is an eigenvalue to the operator $A$.
My attempt:
We know that $A$ is indeed compact, but it is not self-adjoint. However, by some inspection, we have that $iA$ is self-adjoint (and compact). So we just have to calculate $|iA| = |A| = |lambda|$ where $lambda$ is an eigenvalue satisfying $A(f)(x) = lambda f(x)$, for some eigenfunction $f$. Now setting $f(x) = a + bx$ we get by calculation that
$$lambda(a + bx) = int_0^1 (x - y) (a + by) dy = -frac a 2 - frac b 3 + (a + frac b 2)x.$$
But from this I'm not sure how to solve for $lambda$. Maybe there is an another way to solve this?
functional-analysis
It should be $-fraca2$.
â 4-ier
Aug 23 at 10:55
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
For $f in L^2([0, 1]) $ and $x in [0, 1]$ we have the following
$$
A(f)(x) = int_0^1 (x - y) f(y)dy
$$
In this particular exercise I have to calculate the operator norm $| A |$.
We know that from a theorem that if $A$ is compact and self-adjoint then either $|A|$ or $-| A |$ is an eigenvalue to the operator $A$.
My attempt:
We know that $A$ is indeed compact, but it is not self-adjoint. However, by some inspection, we have that $iA$ is self-adjoint (and compact). So we just have to calculate $|iA| = |A| = |lambda|$ where $lambda$ is an eigenvalue satisfying $A(f)(x) = lambda f(x)$, for some eigenfunction $f$. Now setting $f(x) = a + bx$ we get by calculation that
$$lambda(a + bx) = int_0^1 (x - y) (a + by) dy = -frac a 2 - frac b 3 + (a + frac b 2)x.$$
But from this I'm not sure how to solve for $lambda$. Maybe there is an another way to solve this?
functional-analysis
For $f in L^2([0, 1]) $ and $x in [0, 1]$ we have the following
$$
A(f)(x) = int_0^1 (x - y) f(y)dy
$$
In this particular exercise I have to calculate the operator norm $| A |$.
We know that from a theorem that if $A$ is compact and self-adjoint then either $|A|$ or $-| A |$ is an eigenvalue to the operator $A$.
My attempt:
We know that $A$ is indeed compact, but it is not self-adjoint. However, by some inspection, we have that $iA$ is self-adjoint (and compact). So we just have to calculate $|iA| = |A| = |lambda|$ where $lambda$ is an eigenvalue satisfying $A(f)(x) = lambda f(x)$, for some eigenfunction $f$. Now setting $f(x) = a + bx$ we get by calculation that
$$lambda(a + bx) = int_0^1 (x - y) (a + by) dy = -frac a 2 - frac b 3 + (a + frac b 2)x.$$
But from this I'm not sure how to solve for $lambda$. Maybe there is an another way to solve this?
functional-analysis
edited Aug 23 at 11:00
asked Aug 23 at 10:47
Supersalt
325
325
It should be $-fraca2$.
â 4-ier
Aug 23 at 10:55
add a comment |Â
It should be $-fraca2$.
â 4-ier
Aug 23 at 10:55
It should be $-fraca2$.
â 4-ier
Aug 23 at 10:55
It should be $-fraca2$.
â 4-ier
Aug 23 at 10:55
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
First, deal with the simpler cases $a = 0$ or $b = 0$. Second, if $a, b neq 0$, then you can factor out $frac1b$ to instead apply the operator to $fracab + x = c + x$.
The more general case, if you would want to do it, is to identify the constant terms of both sides and the coefficient of $x$ on both sides, getting two equations involving $x, a$ and $b$. Then you want to maximize $|lambda|$ by choosing $a$ and $b$ appropriately.
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
First, deal with the simpler cases $a = 0$ or $b = 0$. Second, if $a, b neq 0$, then you can factor out $frac1b$ to instead apply the operator to $fracab + x = c + x$.
The more general case, if you would want to do it, is to identify the constant terms of both sides and the coefficient of $x$ on both sides, getting two equations involving $x, a$ and $b$. Then you want to maximize $|lambda|$ by choosing $a$ and $b$ appropriately.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
First, deal with the simpler cases $a = 0$ or $b = 0$. Second, if $a, b neq 0$, then you can factor out $frac1b$ to instead apply the operator to $fracab + x = c + x$.
The more general case, if you would want to do it, is to identify the constant terms of both sides and the coefficient of $x$ on both sides, getting two equations involving $x, a$ and $b$. Then you want to maximize $|lambda|$ by choosing $a$ and $b$ appropriately.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
First, deal with the simpler cases $a = 0$ or $b = 0$. Second, if $a, b neq 0$, then you can factor out $frac1b$ to instead apply the operator to $fracab + x = c + x$.
The more general case, if you would want to do it, is to identify the constant terms of both sides and the coefficient of $x$ on both sides, getting two equations involving $x, a$ and $b$. Then you want to maximize $|lambda|$ by choosing $a$ and $b$ appropriately.
First, deal with the simpler cases $a = 0$ or $b = 0$. Second, if $a, b neq 0$, then you can factor out $frac1b$ to instead apply the operator to $fracab + x = c + x$.
The more general case, if you would want to do it, is to identify the constant terms of both sides and the coefficient of $x$ on both sides, getting two equations involving $x, a$ and $b$. Then you want to maximize $|lambda|$ by choosing $a$ and $b$ appropriately.
answered Aug 23 at 10:54
4-ier
5989
5989
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2891970%2fcalculate-the-operator-norm-defined-on-l2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
It should be $-fraca2$.
â 4-ier
Aug 23 at 10:55