Calculate the operator norm defined on L2

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












For $f in L^2([0, 1]) $ and $x in [0, 1]$ we have the following
$$
A(f)(x) = int_0^1 (x - y) f(y)dy
$$
In this particular exercise I have to calculate the operator norm $| A |$.
We know that from a theorem that if $A$ is compact and self-adjoint then either $|A|$ or $-| A |$ is an eigenvalue to the operator $A$.



My attempt:
We know that $A$ is indeed compact, but it is not self-adjoint. However, by some inspection, we have that $iA$ is self-adjoint (and compact). So we just have to calculate $|iA| = |A| = |lambda|$ where $lambda$ is an eigenvalue satisfying $A(f)(x) = lambda f(x)$, for some eigenfunction $f$. Now setting $f(x) = a + bx$ we get by calculation that
$$lambda(a + bx) = int_0^1 (x - y) (a + by) dy = -frac a 2 - frac b 3 + (a + frac b 2)x.$$



But from this I'm not sure how to solve for $lambda$. Maybe there is an another way to solve this?







share|cite|improve this question






















  • It should be $-fraca2$.
    – 4-ier
    Aug 23 at 10:55














up vote
1
down vote

favorite












For $f in L^2([0, 1]) $ and $x in [0, 1]$ we have the following
$$
A(f)(x) = int_0^1 (x - y) f(y)dy
$$
In this particular exercise I have to calculate the operator norm $| A |$.
We know that from a theorem that if $A$ is compact and self-adjoint then either $|A|$ or $-| A |$ is an eigenvalue to the operator $A$.



My attempt:
We know that $A$ is indeed compact, but it is not self-adjoint. However, by some inspection, we have that $iA$ is self-adjoint (and compact). So we just have to calculate $|iA| = |A| = |lambda|$ where $lambda$ is an eigenvalue satisfying $A(f)(x) = lambda f(x)$, for some eigenfunction $f$. Now setting $f(x) = a + bx$ we get by calculation that
$$lambda(a + bx) = int_0^1 (x - y) (a + by) dy = -frac a 2 - frac b 3 + (a + frac b 2)x.$$



But from this I'm not sure how to solve for $lambda$. Maybe there is an another way to solve this?







share|cite|improve this question






















  • It should be $-fraca2$.
    – 4-ier
    Aug 23 at 10:55












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











For $f in L^2([0, 1]) $ and $x in [0, 1]$ we have the following
$$
A(f)(x) = int_0^1 (x - y) f(y)dy
$$
In this particular exercise I have to calculate the operator norm $| A |$.
We know that from a theorem that if $A$ is compact and self-adjoint then either $|A|$ or $-| A |$ is an eigenvalue to the operator $A$.



My attempt:
We know that $A$ is indeed compact, but it is not self-adjoint. However, by some inspection, we have that $iA$ is self-adjoint (and compact). So we just have to calculate $|iA| = |A| = |lambda|$ where $lambda$ is an eigenvalue satisfying $A(f)(x) = lambda f(x)$, for some eigenfunction $f$. Now setting $f(x) = a + bx$ we get by calculation that
$$lambda(a + bx) = int_0^1 (x - y) (a + by) dy = -frac a 2 - frac b 3 + (a + frac b 2)x.$$



But from this I'm not sure how to solve for $lambda$. Maybe there is an another way to solve this?







share|cite|improve this question














For $f in L^2([0, 1]) $ and $x in [0, 1]$ we have the following
$$
A(f)(x) = int_0^1 (x - y) f(y)dy
$$
In this particular exercise I have to calculate the operator norm $| A |$.
We know that from a theorem that if $A$ is compact and self-adjoint then either $|A|$ or $-| A |$ is an eigenvalue to the operator $A$.



My attempt:
We know that $A$ is indeed compact, but it is not self-adjoint. However, by some inspection, we have that $iA$ is self-adjoint (and compact). So we just have to calculate $|iA| = |A| = |lambda|$ where $lambda$ is an eigenvalue satisfying $A(f)(x) = lambda f(x)$, for some eigenfunction $f$. Now setting $f(x) = a + bx$ we get by calculation that
$$lambda(a + bx) = int_0^1 (x - y) (a + by) dy = -frac a 2 - frac b 3 + (a + frac b 2)x.$$



But from this I'm not sure how to solve for $lambda$. Maybe there is an another way to solve this?









share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 23 at 11:00

























asked Aug 23 at 10:47









Supersalt

325




325











  • It should be $-fraca2$.
    – 4-ier
    Aug 23 at 10:55
















  • It should be $-fraca2$.
    – 4-ier
    Aug 23 at 10:55















It should be $-fraca2$.
– 4-ier
Aug 23 at 10:55




It should be $-fraca2$.
– 4-ier
Aug 23 at 10:55










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










First, deal with the simpler cases $a = 0$ or $b = 0$. Second, if $a, b neq 0$, then you can factor out $frac1b$ to instead apply the operator to $fracab + x = c + x$.



The more general case, if you would want to do it, is to identify the constant terms of both sides and the coefficient of $x$ on both sides, getting two equations involving $x, a$ and $b$. Then you want to maximize $|lambda|$ by choosing $a$ and $b$ appropriately.






share|cite|improve this answer




















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2891970%2fcalculate-the-operator-norm-defined-on-l2%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted










    First, deal with the simpler cases $a = 0$ or $b = 0$. Second, if $a, b neq 0$, then you can factor out $frac1b$ to instead apply the operator to $fracab + x = c + x$.



    The more general case, if you would want to do it, is to identify the constant terms of both sides and the coefficient of $x$ on both sides, getting two equations involving $x, a$ and $b$. Then you want to maximize $|lambda|$ by choosing $a$ and $b$ appropriately.






    share|cite|improve this answer
























      up vote
      1
      down vote



      accepted










      First, deal with the simpler cases $a = 0$ or $b = 0$. Second, if $a, b neq 0$, then you can factor out $frac1b$ to instead apply the operator to $fracab + x = c + x$.



      The more general case, if you would want to do it, is to identify the constant terms of both sides and the coefficient of $x$ on both sides, getting two equations involving $x, a$ and $b$. Then you want to maximize $|lambda|$ by choosing $a$ and $b$ appropriately.






      share|cite|improve this answer






















        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted






        First, deal with the simpler cases $a = 0$ or $b = 0$. Second, if $a, b neq 0$, then you can factor out $frac1b$ to instead apply the operator to $fracab + x = c + x$.



        The more general case, if you would want to do it, is to identify the constant terms of both sides and the coefficient of $x$ on both sides, getting two equations involving $x, a$ and $b$. Then you want to maximize $|lambda|$ by choosing $a$ and $b$ appropriately.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        First, deal with the simpler cases $a = 0$ or $b = 0$. Second, if $a, b neq 0$, then you can factor out $frac1b$ to instead apply the operator to $fracab + x = c + x$.



        The more general case, if you would want to do it, is to identify the constant terms of both sides and the coefficient of $x$ on both sides, getting two equations involving $x, a$ and $b$. Then you want to maximize $|lambda|$ by choosing $a$ and $b$ appropriately.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Aug 23 at 10:54









        4-ier

        5989




        5989



























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2891970%2fcalculate-the-operator-norm-defined-on-l2%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            這個網誌中的熱門文章

            How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

            Mutual Information Always Non-negative

            Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?