Do all terms $n$ of OEIS sequence A228059 have a $p$ with exponent $1$?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Do all terms $n$ of OEIS sequence A228059 have a $p$ with exponent $1$?
OEIS sequence A228059: Odd numbers of the form $p^1+4kr^2$, where $p$ is prime of the form $1+4m$, $r > 1$, and $gcd(p,r) = 1$ that are closer to being perfect than previous terms.
Here are the first couple of terms:
$$45 = 5cdot3^2$$
$$405 = 5cdot3^4$$
$$2205 = 5cdot(3cdot7)^2$$
$$26325 = 13cdot(3^2cdot5)^2$$
$$236925 = 13cdot(3^3cdot5)^2$$
$$1380825 = 17cdot(3cdot5cdot19)^2$$
$$1660725 = 61cdot(3cdot5cdot11)^2$$
$$35698725 = 61cdot(3^2cdot5cdot17)^2$$
$$3138290325 = 53cdot(3^4cdot5cdot19)^2$$
UPDATE - July 05 2017 (7:30 PM - Manila time): I am currently running the Mathematica code referenced in the OEIS sequence to compute more terms past $3138290325$.
UPDATE - July 06 2017 (1:00 AM - Manila time): The Mathematica code is still running and is currently at $35698725$. It has not displayed $3138290325$ yet.
number-theory elementary-number-theory conjectures divisor-sum perfect-numbers
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Do all terms $n$ of OEIS sequence A228059 have a $p$ with exponent $1$?
OEIS sequence A228059: Odd numbers of the form $p^1+4kr^2$, where $p$ is prime of the form $1+4m$, $r > 1$, and $gcd(p,r) = 1$ that are closer to being perfect than previous terms.
Here are the first couple of terms:
$$45 = 5cdot3^2$$
$$405 = 5cdot3^4$$
$$2205 = 5cdot(3cdot7)^2$$
$$26325 = 13cdot(3^2cdot5)^2$$
$$236925 = 13cdot(3^3cdot5)^2$$
$$1380825 = 17cdot(3cdot5cdot19)^2$$
$$1660725 = 61cdot(3cdot5cdot11)^2$$
$$35698725 = 61cdot(3^2cdot5cdot17)^2$$
$$3138290325 = 53cdot(3^4cdot5cdot19)^2$$
UPDATE - July 05 2017 (7:30 PM - Manila time): I am currently running the Mathematica code referenced in the OEIS sequence to compute more terms past $3138290325$.
UPDATE - July 06 2017 (1:00 AM - Manila time): The Mathematica code is still running and is currently at $35698725$. It has not displayed $3138290325$ yet.
number-theory elementary-number-theory conjectures divisor-sum perfect-numbers
Given the information on the OEIS page, it looks like an open problem if we always will have $k = 0$ or not...
â Dirk Liebhold
Jul 5 '17 at 11:57
1
@Ahmad, can you link to the question(s) I asked before, in disguise to use your term, that is the same as the present question?
â Jose Arnaldo Bebita Dris
Jul 5 '17 at 12:05
@DirkLiebhold, please note that the papers listed on the OEIS page are independent of sequence A228059.
â Jose Arnaldo Bebita Dris
Jul 5 '17 at 12:06
1
I wasn't referring to the paper, but rather the sentence "Coincidently, the first 9 numbers in this sequence have exponent 1.". If someone already worked out that all terms have exponent 1, not just the first 9 ones, then why didn't he post it there?
â Dirk Liebhold
Jul 5 '17 at 12:08
1
Sorry, not the same but related. My mistake.
â Ahmad
Jul 5 '17 at 12:10
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Do all terms $n$ of OEIS sequence A228059 have a $p$ with exponent $1$?
OEIS sequence A228059: Odd numbers of the form $p^1+4kr^2$, where $p$ is prime of the form $1+4m$, $r > 1$, and $gcd(p,r) = 1$ that are closer to being perfect than previous terms.
Here are the first couple of terms:
$$45 = 5cdot3^2$$
$$405 = 5cdot3^4$$
$$2205 = 5cdot(3cdot7)^2$$
$$26325 = 13cdot(3^2cdot5)^2$$
$$236925 = 13cdot(3^3cdot5)^2$$
$$1380825 = 17cdot(3cdot5cdot19)^2$$
$$1660725 = 61cdot(3cdot5cdot11)^2$$
$$35698725 = 61cdot(3^2cdot5cdot17)^2$$
$$3138290325 = 53cdot(3^4cdot5cdot19)^2$$
UPDATE - July 05 2017 (7:30 PM - Manila time): I am currently running the Mathematica code referenced in the OEIS sequence to compute more terms past $3138290325$.
UPDATE - July 06 2017 (1:00 AM - Manila time): The Mathematica code is still running and is currently at $35698725$. It has not displayed $3138290325$ yet.
number-theory elementary-number-theory conjectures divisor-sum perfect-numbers
Do all terms $n$ of OEIS sequence A228059 have a $p$ with exponent $1$?
OEIS sequence A228059: Odd numbers of the form $p^1+4kr^2$, where $p$ is prime of the form $1+4m$, $r > 1$, and $gcd(p,r) = 1$ that are closer to being perfect than previous terms.
Here are the first couple of terms:
$$45 = 5cdot3^2$$
$$405 = 5cdot3^4$$
$$2205 = 5cdot(3cdot7)^2$$
$$26325 = 13cdot(3^2cdot5)^2$$
$$236925 = 13cdot(3^3cdot5)^2$$
$$1380825 = 17cdot(3cdot5cdot19)^2$$
$$1660725 = 61cdot(3cdot5cdot11)^2$$
$$35698725 = 61cdot(3^2cdot5cdot17)^2$$
$$3138290325 = 53cdot(3^4cdot5cdot19)^2$$
UPDATE - July 05 2017 (7:30 PM - Manila time): I am currently running the Mathematica code referenced in the OEIS sequence to compute more terms past $3138290325$.
UPDATE - July 06 2017 (1:00 AM - Manila time): The Mathematica code is still running and is currently at $35698725$. It has not displayed $3138290325$ yet.
number-theory elementary-number-theory conjectures divisor-sum perfect-numbers
edited Jul 5 '17 at 17:03
asked Jul 5 '17 at 11:31
Jose Arnaldo Bebita Dris
5,10031941
5,10031941
Given the information on the OEIS page, it looks like an open problem if we always will have $k = 0$ or not...
â Dirk Liebhold
Jul 5 '17 at 11:57
1
@Ahmad, can you link to the question(s) I asked before, in disguise to use your term, that is the same as the present question?
â Jose Arnaldo Bebita Dris
Jul 5 '17 at 12:05
@DirkLiebhold, please note that the papers listed on the OEIS page are independent of sequence A228059.
â Jose Arnaldo Bebita Dris
Jul 5 '17 at 12:06
1
I wasn't referring to the paper, but rather the sentence "Coincidently, the first 9 numbers in this sequence have exponent 1.". If someone already worked out that all terms have exponent 1, not just the first 9 ones, then why didn't he post it there?
â Dirk Liebhold
Jul 5 '17 at 12:08
1
Sorry, not the same but related. My mistake.
â Ahmad
Jul 5 '17 at 12:10
 |Â
show 1 more comment
Given the information on the OEIS page, it looks like an open problem if we always will have $k = 0$ or not...
â Dirk Liebhold
Jul 5 '17 at 11:57
1
@Ahmad, can you link to the question(s) I asked before, in disguise to use your term, that is the same as the present question?
â Jose Arnaldo Bebita Dris
Jul 5 '17 at 12:05
@DirkLiebhold, please note that the papers listed on the OEIS page are independent of sequence A228059.
â Jose Arnaldo Bebita Dris
Jul 5 '17 at 12:06
1
I wasn't referring to the paper, but rather the sentence "Coincidently, the first 9 numbers in this sequence have exponent 1.". If someone already worked out that all terms have exponent 1, not just the first 9 ones, then why didn't he post it there?
â Dirk Liebhold
Jul 5 '17 at 12:08
1
Sorry, not the same but related. My mistake.
â Ahmad
Jul 5 '17 at 12:10
Given the information on the OEIS page, it looks like an open problem if we always will have $k = 0$ or not...
â Dirk Liebhold
Jul 5 '17 at 11:57
Given the information on the OEIS page, it looks like an open problem if we always will have $k = 0$ or not...
â Dirk Liebhold
Jul 5 '17 at 11:57
1
1
@Ahmad, can you link to the question(s) I asked before, in disguise to use your term, that is the same as the present question?
â Jose Arnaldo Bebita Dris
Jul 5 '17 at 12:05
@Ahmad, can you link to the question(s) I asked before, in disguise to use your term, that is the same as the present question?
â Jose Arnaldo Bebita Dris
Jul 5 '17 at 12:05
@DirkLiebhold, please note that the papers listed on the OEIS page are independent of sequence A228059.
â Jose Arnaldo Bebita Dris
Jul 5 '17 at 12:06
@DirkLiebhold, please note that the papers listed on the OEIS page are independent of sequence A228059.
â Jose Arnaldo Bebita Dris
Jul 5 '17 at 12:06
1
1
I wasn't referring to the paper, but rather the sentence "Coincidently, the first 9 numbers in this sequence have exponent 1.". If someone already worked out that all terms have exponent 1, not just the first 9 ones, then why didn't he post it there?
â Dirk Liebhold
Jul 5 '17 at 12:08
I wasn't referring to the paper, but rather the sentence "Coincidently, the first 9 numbers in this sequence have exponent 1.". If someone already worked out that all terms have exponent 1, not just the first 9 ones, then why didn't he post it there?
â Dirk Liebhold
Jul 5 '17 at 12:08
1
1
Sorry, not the same but related. My mistake.
â Ahmad
Jul 5 '17 at 12:10
Sorry, not the same but related. My mistake.
â Ahmad
Jul 5 '17 at 12:10
 |Â
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Here are the first $37$ terms:
$$45 = 5cdot3^2$$
$$405 = 5cdot3^4$$
$$2205 = 5cdot(3cdot7)^2$$
$$26325 = 13cdot(3^2cdot5)^2$$
$$236925 = 13cdot(3^3cdot5)^2$$
$$1380825 = 17cdot(3cdot5cdot19)^2$$
$$1660725 = 61cdot(3cdot5cdot11)^2$$
$$35698725 = 61cdot(3^2cdot5cdot17)^2$$
$$3138290325 = 53cdot(3^4cdot5cdot19)^2$$
$$29891138805 = 5cdot(3^2cdot11^2cdot71)^2$$
$$73846750725 = 509cdot(3cdot5cdot11cdot73)^2$$
$$194401220013 = 21557cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$194509436121 = 21569cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$194581580193 = 21577cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$194689796301 = 21589cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$194798012409 = 21601cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$194906228517 = 21613cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$194942300553 = 21617cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$195230876841 = 21649cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$195339092949 = 21661cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$195447309057 = 21673cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$195699813309 = 21701cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$195808029417 = 21713cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$196024461633 = 21737cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$196204821813 = 21757cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$196349109957 = 21773cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$196745902353 = 21817cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$196781974389 = 21821cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$196962334569 = 21841cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$197323054929 = 21881cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$197431271037 = 21893cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$197755919361 = 21929cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$197828063433 = 21937cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$198044495649 = 21961cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$198188783793 = 21977cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$198369143973 = 21997cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$198513432117 = 22013cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
(I used WolframAlpha for computing the prime factorizations of the $11$th to $37$th terms.) Note that each of the first $37$ terms of OEIS sequence A228059 have a $p$ with exponent $1$.
Furthermore, note that the non-Euler part value ($n^2$) of
$$(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
is deficient-perfect, and that this condition is known to be equivalent to the Descartes-Frenicle-Sorli conjecture that $s=1$, if $q^s n^2$ is an odd perfect number with special/Euler prime $q$.
Lastly, by this answer, it is known that the Descartes spoof
$$mathscrD = 3^2cdot7^2cdot11^2cdot13^2cdot22021 = 198585576189$$
is not a member of OEIS sequence A228059.
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Here are the first $37$ terms:
$$45 = 5cdot3^2$$
$$405 = 5cdot3^4$$
$$2205 = 5cdot(3cdot7)^2$$
$$26325 = 13cdot(3^2cdot5)^2$$
$$236925 = 13cdot(3^3cdot5)^2$$
$$1380825 = 17cdot(3cdot5cdot19)^2$$
$$1660725 = 61cdot(3cdot5cdot11)^2$$
$$35698725 = 61cdot(3^2cdot5cdot17)^2$$
$$3138290325 = 53cdot(3^4cdot5cdot19)^2$$
$$29891138805 = 5cdot(3^2cdot11^2cdot71)^2$$
$$73846750725 = 509cdot(3cdot5cdot11cdot73)^2$$
$$194401220013 = 21557cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$194509436121 = 21569cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$194581580193 = 21577cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$194689796301 = 21589cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$194798012409 = 21601cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$194906228517 = 21613cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$194942300553 = 21617cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$195230876841 = 21649cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$195339092949 = 21661cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$195447309057 = 21673cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$195699813309 = 21701cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$195808029417 = 21713cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$196024461633 = 21737cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$196204821813 = 21757cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$196349109957 = 21773cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$196745902353 = 21817cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$196781974389 = 21821cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$196962334569 = 21841cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$197323054929 = 21881cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$197431271037 = 21893cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$197755919361 = 21929cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$197828063433 = 21937cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$198044495649 = 21961cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$198188783793 = 21977cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$198369143973 = 21997cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$198513432117 = 22013cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
(I used WolframAlpha for computing the prime factorizations of the $11$th to $37$th terms.) Note that each of the first $37$ terms of OEIS sequence A228059 have a $p$ with exponent $1$.
Furthermore, note that the non-Euler part value ($n^2$) of
$$(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
is deficient-perfect, and that this condition is known to be equivalent to the Descartes-Frenicle-Sorli conjecture that $s=1$, if $q^s n^2$ is an odd perfect number with special/Euler prime $q$.
Lastly, by this answer, it is known that the Descartes spoof
$$mathscrD = 3^2cdot7^2cdot11^2cdot13^2cdot22021 = 198585576189$$
is not a member of OEIS sequence A228059.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Here are the first $37$ terms:
$$45 = 5cdot3^2$$
$$405 = 5cdot3^4$$
$$2205 = 5cdot(3cdot7)^2$$
$$26325 = 13cdot(3^2cdot5)^2$$
$$236925 = 13cdot(3^3cdot5)^2$$
$$1380825 = 17cdot(3cdot5cdot19)^2$$
$$1660725 = 61cdot(3cdot5cdot11)^2$$
$$35698725 = 61cdot(3^2cdot5cdot17)^2$$
$$3138290325 = 53cdot(3^4cdot5cdot19)^2$$
$$29891138805 = 5cdot(3^2cdot11^2cdot71)^2$$
$$73846750725 = 509cdot(3cdot5cdot11cdot73)^2$$
$$194401220013 = 21557cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$194509436121 = 21569cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$194581580193 = 21577cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$194689796301 = 21589cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$194798012409 = 21601cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$194906228517 = 21613cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$194942300553 = 21617cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$195230876841 = 21649cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$195339092949 = 21661cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$195447309057 = 21673cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$195699813309 = 21701cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$195808029417 = 21713cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$196024461633 = 21737cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$196204821813 = 21757cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$196349109957 = 21773cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$196745902353 = 21817cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$196781974389 = 21821cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$196962334569 = 21841cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$197323054929 = 21881cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$197431271037 = 21893cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$197755919361 = 21929cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$197828063433 = 21937cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$198044495649 = 21961cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$198188783793 = 21977cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$198369143973 = 21997cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$198513432117 = 22013cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
(I used WolframAlpha for computing the prime factorizations of the $11$th to $37$th terms.) Note that each of the first $37$ terms of OEIS sequence A228059 have a $p$ with exponent $1$.
Furthermore, note that the non-Euler part value ($n^2$) of
$$(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
is deficient-perfect, and that this condition is known to be equivalent to the Descartes-Frenicle-Sorli conjecture that $s=1$, if $q^s n^2$ is an odd perfect number with special/Euler prime $q$.
Lastly, by this answer, it is known that the Descartes spoof
$$mathscrD = 3^2cdot7^2cdot11^2cdot13^2cdot22021 = 198585576189$$
is not a member of OEIS sequence A228059.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Here are the first $37$ terms:
$$45 = 5cdot3^2$$
$$405 = 5cdot3^4$$
$$2205 = 5cdot(3cdot7)^2$$
$$26325 = 13cdot(3^2cdot5)^2$$
$$236925 = 13cdot(3^3cdot5)^2$$
$$1380825 = 17cdot(3cdot5cdot19)^2$$
$$1660725 = 61cdot(3cdot5cdot11)^2$$
$$35698725 = 61cdot(3^2cdot5cdot17)^2$$
$$3138290325 = 53cdot(3^4cdot5cdot19)^2$$
$$29891138805 = 5cdot(3^2cdot11^2cdot71)^2$$
$$73846750725 = 509cdot(3cdot5cdot11cdot73)^2$$
$$194401220013 = 21557cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$194509436121 = 21569cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$194581580193 = 21577cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$194689796301 = 21589cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$194798012409 = 21601cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$194906228517 = 21613cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$194942300553 = 21617cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$195230876841 = 21649cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$195339092949 = 21661cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$195447309057 = 21673cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$195699813309 = 21701cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$195808029417 = 21713cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$196024461633 = 21737cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$196204821813 = 21757cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$196349109957 = 21773cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$196745902353 = 21817cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$196781974389 = 21821cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$196962334569 = 21841cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$197323054929 = 21881cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$197431271037 = 21893cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$197755919361 = 21929cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$197828063433 = 21937cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$198044495649 = 21961cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$198188783793 = 21977cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$198369143973 = 21997cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$198513432117 = 22013cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
(I used WolframAlpha for computing the prime factorizations of the $11$th to $37$th terms.) Note that each of the first $37$ terms of OEIS sequence A228059 have a $p$ with exponent $1$.
Furthermore, note that the non-Euler part value ($n^2$) of
$$(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
is deficient-perfect, and that this condition is known to be equivalent to the Descartes-Frenicle-Sorli conjecture that $s=1$, if $q^s n^2$ is an odd perfect number with special/Euler prime $q$.
Lastly, by this answer, it is known that the Descartes spoof
$$mathscrD = 3^2cdot7^2cdot11^2cdot13^2cdot22021 = 198585576189$$
is not a member of OEIS sequence A228059.
Here are the first $37$ terms:
$$45 = 5cdot3^2$$
$$405 = 5cdot3^4$$
$$2205 = 5cdot(3cdot7)^2$$
$$26325 = 13cdot(3^2cdot5)^2$$
$$236925 = 13cdot(3^3cdot5)^2$$
$$1380825 = 17cdot(3cdot5cdot19)^2$$
$$1660725 = 61cdot(3cdot5cdot11)^2$$
$$35698725 = 61cdot(3^2cdot5cdot17)^2$$
$$3138290325 = 53cdot(3^4cdot5cdot19)^2$$
$$29891138805 = 5cdot(3^2cdot11^2cdot71)^2$$
$$73846750725 = 509cdot(3cdot5cdot11cdot73)^2$$
$$194401220013 = 21557cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$194509436121 = 21569cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$194581580193 = 21577cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$194689796301 = 21589cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$194798012409 = 21601cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$194906228517 = 21613cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$194942300553 = 21617cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$195230876841 = 21649cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$195339092949 = 21661cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$195447309057 = 21673cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$195699813309 = 21701cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$195808029417 = 21713cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$196024461633 = 21737cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$196204821813 = 21757cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$196349109957 = 21773cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$196745902353 = 21817cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$196781974389 = 21821cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$196962334569 = 21841cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$197323054929 = 21881cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$197431271037 = 21893cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$197755919361 = 21929cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$197828063433 = 21937cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$198044495649 = 21961cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$198188783793 = 21977cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$198369143973 = 21997cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
$$198513432117 = 22013cdot(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
(I used WolframAlpha for computing the prime factorizations of the $11$th to $37$th terms.) Note that each of the first $37$ terms of OEIS sequence A228059 have a $p$ with exponent $1$.
Furthermore, note that the non-Euler part value ($n^2$) of
$$(3cdot7cdot11cdot13)^2$$
is deficient-perfect, and that this condition is known to be equivalent to the Descartes-Frenicle-Sorli conjecture that $s=1$, if $q^s n^2$ is an odd perfect number with special/Euler prime $q$.
Lastly, by this answer, it is known that the Descartes spoof
$$mathscrD = 3^2cdot7^2cdot11^2cdot13^2cdot22021 = 198585576189$$
is not a member of OEIS sequence A228059.
answered Aug 23 at 8:36
Jose Arnaldo Bebita Dris
5,10031941
5,10031941
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2347178%2fdo-all-terms-n-of-oeis-sequence-a228059-have-a-p-with-exponent-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Given the information on the OEIS page, it looks like an open problem if we always will have $k = 0$ or not...
â Dirk Liebhold
Jul 5 '17 at 11:57
1
@Ahmad, can you link to the question(s) I asked before, in disguise to use your term, that is the same as the present question?
â Jose Arnaldo Bebita Dris
Jul 5 '17 at 12:05
@DirkLiebhold, please note that the papers listed on the OEIS page are independent of sequence A228059.
â Jose Arnaldo Bebita Dris
Jul 5 '17 at 12:06
1
I wasn't referring to the paper, but rather the sentence "Coincidently, the first 9 numbers in this sequence have exponent 1.". If someone already worked out that all terms have exponent 1, not just the first 9 ones, then why didn't he post it there?
â Dirk Liebhold
Jul 5 '17 at 12:08
1
Sorry, not the same but related. My mistake.
â Ahmad
Jul 5 '17 at 12:10