Disjoint union topology and $f: Z to A$ surjective fuction
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Consider $Z : = cup_i in I Z_i$ a disjoint union of topological spaces and $f : Z to A$ a surjective function. Put the quotient topology on A and then prove that a subset $U subseteq A$ is open in $A$ if and only if for all $i in I, f^-1 (U) cap Z_i$ is open in $Z$. Prove that a subset $V subseteq A$ is closed in $A$ if and only if for all $i in I, f^-1 (V) cap Z_i$ is closed in $Z$.
We define the quotient topology on A by $Im_A : = f^-1(U) in Im $ where $Im$ is the disjoint union topology generated from $Z$.
Here is my attempt for the first part.
Assume $U subset A$ is open in $A$. Then $U in Im_A$ which implies that $f^-1(U) in Im $ by definition of $Im_A$. Then we fix $i$. So $$f^-1(U)cap Z_i = V subseteq f^-1(U) subseteq Im_i subseteq Im $$
I am struggling with the reverse direction and proving for closed sets.
general-topology
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Consider $Z : = cup_i in I Z_i$ a disjoint union of topological spaces and $f : Z to A$ a surjective function. Put the quotient topology on A and then prove that a subset $U subseteq A$ is open in $A$ if and only if for all $i in I, f^-1 (U) cap Z_i$ is open in $Z$. Prove that a subset $V subseteq A$ is closed in $A$ if and only if for all $i in I, f^-1 (V) cap Z_i$ is closed in $Z$.
We define the quotient topology on A by $Im_A : = f^-1(U) in Im $ where $Im$ is the disjoint union topology generated from $Z$.
Here is my attempt for the first part.
Assume $U subset A$ is open in $A$. Then $U in Im_A$ which implies that $f^-1(U) in Im $ by definition of $Im_A$. Then we fix $i$. So $$f^-1(U)cap Z_i = V subseteq f^-1(U) subseteq Im_i subseteq Im $$
I am struggling with the reverse direction and proving for closed sets.
general-topology
Please check your last formula... And just use the fact that (by definition) a set $Vsubset Z$ is open in $Z$ if and only if $Vcap Z_i$ is open in $Z_i$.
– amsmath
Sep 11 at 3:30
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Consider $Z : = cup_i in I Z_i$ a disjoint union of topological spaces and $f : Z to A$ a surjective function. Put the quotient topology on A and then prove that a subset $U subseteq A$ is open in $A$ if and only if for all $i in I, f^-1 (U) cap Z_i$ is open in $Z$. Prove that a subset $V subseteq A$ is closed in $A$ if and only if for all $i in I, f^-1 (V) cap Z_i$ is closed in $Z$.
We define the quotient topology on A by $Im_A : = f^-1(U) in Im $ where $Im$ is the disjoint union topology generated from $Z$.
Here is my attempt for the first part.
Assume $U subset A$ is open in $A$. Then $U in Im_A$ which implies that $f^-1(U) in Im $ by definition of $Im_A$. Then we fix $i$. So $$f^-1(U)cap Z_i = V subseteq f^-1(U) subseteq Im_i subseteq Im $$
I am struggling with the reverse direction and proving for closed sets.
general-topology
Consider $Z : = cup_i in I Z_i$ a disjoint union of topological spaces and $f : Z to A$ a surjective function. Put the quotient topology on A and then prove that a subset $U subseteq A$ is open in $A$ if and only if for all $i in I, f^-1 (U) cap Z_i$ is open in $Z$. Prove that a subset $V subseteq A$ is closed in $A$ if and only if for all $i in I, f^-1 (V) cap Z_i$ is closed in $Z$.
We define the quotient topology on A by $Im_A : = f^-1(U) in Im $ where $Im$ is the disjoint union topology generated from $Z$.
Here is my attempt for the first part.
Assume $U subset A$ is open in $A$. Then $U in Im_A$ which implies that $f^-1(U) in Im $ by definition of $Im_A$. Then we fix $i$. So $$f^-1(U)cap Z_i = V subseteq f^-1(U) subseteq Im_i subseteq Im $$
I am struggling with the reverse direction and proving for closed sets.
general-topology
general-topology
edited Sep 11 at 3:41
asked Sep 11 at 3:16
frostyfeet
1558
1558
Please check your last formula... And just use the fact that (by definition) a set $Vsubset Z$ is open in $Z$ if and only if $Vcap Z_i$ is open in $Z_i$.
– amsmath
Sep 11 at 3:30
add a comment |
Please check your last formula... And just use the fact that (by definition) a set $Vsubset Z$ is open in $Z$ if and only if $Vcap Z_i$ is open in $Z_i$.
– amsmath
Sep 11 at 3:30
Please check your last formula... And just use the fact that (by definition) a set $Vsubset Z$ is open in $Z$ if and only if $Vcap Z_i$ is open in $Z_i$.
– amsmath
Sep 11 at 3:30
Please check your last formula... And just use the fact that (by definition) a set $Vsubset Z$ is open in $Z$ if and only if $Vcap Z_i$ is open in $Z_i$.
– amsmath
Sep 11 at 3:30
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
$O$ is open in $A$ iff $f^-1[O]$ is open in $Z$ (this is the definition of the quotient topology on $A$)
A set $O$ is open in $Z$ iff for all $iin I$, $O cap Z_i$ is open in $Z_i$. (definition of the disjoint sum topology)
Combining: $O$ is open in $A$ iff for all $i$, $f^-1[O] cap Z_i$ is open in $Z_i$. And note that $f^-1[O]cap Z_i = (f|_Z_i)^-1[O]$ so that we get that all $f$ restricted to $Z_i$ are also quotient maps (where we don't ask quotient maps to be surjective necessarily).
Both the characterisations of the quotient and the sum topology hold with closed sets instead of open sets as well; the proof of this is completely standard involving some simple set theory with taking complements; try it.
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
$O$ is open in $A$ iff $f^-1[O]$ is open in $Z$ (this is the definition of the quotient topology on $A$)
A set $O$ is open in $Z$ iff for all $iin I$, $O cap Z_i$ is open in $Z_i$. (definition of the disjoint sum topology)
Combining: $O$ is open in $A$ iff for all $i$, $f^-1[O] cap Z_i$ is open in $Z_i$. And note that $f^-1[O]cap Z_i = (f|_Z_i)^-1[O]$ so that we get that all $f$ restricted to $Z_i$ are also quotient maps (where we don't ask quotient maps to be surjective necessarily).
Both the characterisations of the quotient and the sum topology hold with closed sets instead of open sets as well; the proof of this is completely standard involving some simple set theory with taking complements; try it.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
$O$ is open in $A$ iff $f^-1[O]$ is open in $Z$ (this is the definition of the quotient topology on $A$)
A set $O$ is open in $Z$ iff for all $iin I$, $O cap Z_i$ is open in $Z_i$. (definition of the disjoint sum topology)
Combining: $O$ is open in $A$ iff for all $i$, $f^-1[O] cap Z_i$ is open in $Z_i$. And note that $f^-1[O]cap Z_i = (f|_Z_i)^-1[O]$ so that we get that all $f$ restricted to $Z_i$ are also quotient maps (where we don't ask quotient maps to be surjective necessarily).
Both the characterisations of the quotient and the sum topology hold with closed sets instead of open sets as well; the proof of this is completely standard involving some simple set theory with taking complements; try it.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
$O$ is open in $A$ iff $f^-1[O]$ is open in $Z$ (this is the definition of the quotient topology on $A$)
A set $O$ is open in $Z$ iff for all $iin I$, $O cap Z_i$ is open in $Z_i$. (definition of the disjoint sum topology)
Combining: $O$ is open in $A$ iff for all $i$, $f^-1[O] cap Z_i$ is open in $Z_i$. And note that $f^-1[O]cap Z_i = (f|_Z_i)^-1[O]$ so that we get that all $f$ restricted to $Z_i$ are also quotient maps (where we don't ask quotient maps to be surjective necessarily).
Both the characterisations of the quotient and the sum topology hold with closed sets instead of open sets as well; the proof of this is completely standard involving some simple set theory with taking complements; try it.
$O$ is open in $A$ iff $f^-1[O]$ is open in $Z$ (this is the definition of the quotient topology on $A$)
A set $O$ is open in $Z$ iff for all $iin I$, $O cap Z_i$ is open in $Z_i$. (definition of the disjoint sum topology)
Combining: $O$ is open in $A$ iff for all $i$, $f^-1[O] cap Z_i$ is open in $Z_i$. And note that $f^-1[O]cap Z_i = (f|_Z_i)^-1[O]$ so that we get that all $f$ restricted to $Z_i$ are also quotient maps (where we don't ask quotient maps to be surjective necessarily).
Both the characterisations of the quotient and the sum topology hold with closed sets instead of open sets as well; the proof of this is completely standard involving some simple set theory with taking complements; try it.
answered Sep 11 at 9:01
Henno Brandsma
99.5k344107
99.5k344107
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2912700%2fdisjoint-union-topology-and-f-z-to-a-surjective-fuction%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Please check your last formula... And just use the fact that (by definition) a set $Vsubset Z$ is open in $Z$ if and only if $Vcap Z_i$ is open in $Z_i$.
– amsmath
Sep 11 at 3:30