How to rearrange this square root so a denominator is out the front?

Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I have the equation:
$$K_f sqrtleft(fracF_maxcdot Lcdot ytcdot I_uright)^2 +3left(fracV_maxtcdot Lright)^2$$
And I need to bring the $mathbf t$ out the front of the square root along with the $mathbf K_f$ however I don't know what I need to do the equation to do this.
I have tried to make bring the $mathbf t$ up to the numerator like so:
$$K_f sqrtleft(fracF_maxcdot Lcdot ycdot t^-1I_uright)^2 +3left(fracV_maxcdot t^-1Lright)^2$$
Then I have tried separate it from its quotient:
$$K_f sqrtleft(fracF_maxcdot Lcdot yI_u cdot fract^-11right)^2 +3left(fracV_maxL cdot fract^-11right)^2$$
This is where I am unsure. I have assumed that the product of two squares is the same as the square of the two products:
$$K_f sqrtleft(fracF_maxcdot Lcdot yI_uright)^2left(fract^-11right)^2 +3left(fracV_maxLright)^2left(fract^-11right)^2$$
Now I am not sure what to do with the terms with the $mathbf t$ in it. Would someone be able to help me out in getting both the $mathbf K_f$ and $mathbf t$ outside of the square root?
algebra-precalculus
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I have the equation:
$$K_f sqrtleft(fracF_maxcdot Lcdot ytcdot I_uright)^2 +3left(fracV_maxtcdot Lright)^2$$
And I need to bring the $mathbf t$ out the front of the square root along with the $mathbf K_f$ however I don't know what I need to do the equation to do this.
I have tried to make bring the $mathbf t$ up to the numerator like so:
$$K_f sqrtleft(fracF_maxcdot Lcdot ycdot t^-1I_uright)^2 +3left(fracV_maxcdot t^-1Lright)^2$$
Then I have tried separate it from its quotient:
$$K_f sqrtleft(fracF_maxcdot Lcdot yI_u cdot fract^-11right)^2 +3left(fracV_maxL cdot fract^-11right)^2$$
This is where I am unsure. I have assumed that the product of two squares is the same as the square of the two products:
$$K_f sqrtleft(fracF_maxcdot Lcdot yI_uright)^2left(fract^-11right)^2 +3left(fracV_maxLright)^2left(fract^-11right)^2$$
Now I am not sure what to do with the terms with the $mathbf t$ in it. Would someone be able to help me out in getting both the $mathbf K_f$ and $mathbf t$ outside of the square root?
algebra-precalculus
1
Your assumption is correct: the product of two squares is the same as the square of the product. Even more appropriately in this case, the square root of a product is the product of the square roots of the factors. The additional piece that you need is that $t^-2$ is a common factor of the terms of the sum, so you can use the distributive law to pull it out as one factor of the product - then you can apply the square root to each factor.
â NickD
Sep 4 at 12:21
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I have the equation:
$$K_f sqrtleft(fracF_maxcdot Lcdot ytcdot I_uright)^2 +3left(fracV_maxtcdot Lright)^2$$
And I need to bring the $mathbf t$ out the front of the square root along with the $mathbf K_f$ however I don't know what I need to do the equation to do this.
I have tried to make bring the $mathbf t$ up to the numerator like so:
$$K_f sqrtleft(fracF_maxcdot Lcdot ycdot t^-1I_uright)^2 +3left(fracV_maxcdot t^-1Lright)^2$$
Then I have tried separate it from its quotient:
$$K_f sqrtleft(fracF_maxcdot Lcdot yI_u cdot fract^-11right)^2 +3left(fracV_maxL cdot fract^-11right)^2$$
This is where I am unsure. I have assumed that the product of two squares is the same as the square of the two products:
$$K_f sqrtleft(fracF_maxcdot Lcdot yI_uright)^2left(fract^-11right)^2 +3left(fracV_maxLright)^2left(fract^-11right)^2$$
Now I am not sure what to do with the terms with the $mathbf t$ in it. Would someone be able to help me out in getting both the $mathbf K_f$ and $mathbf t$ outside of the square root?
algebra-precalculus
I have the equation:
$$K_f sqrtleft(fracF_maxcdot Lcdot ytcdot I_uright)^2 +3left(fracV_maxtcdot Lright)^2$$
And I need to bring the $mathbf t$ out the front of the square root along with the $mathbf K_f$ however I don't know what I need to do the equation to do this.
I have tried to make bring the $mathbf t$ up to the numerator like so:
$$K_f sqrtleft(fracF_maxcdot Lcdot ycdot t^-1I_uright)^2 +3left(fracV_maxcdot t^-1Lright)^2$$
Then I have tried separate it from its quotient:
$$K_f sqrtleft(fracF_maxcdot Lcdot yI_u cdot fract^-11right)^2 +3left(fracV_maxL cdot fract^-11right)^2$$
This is where I am unsure. I have assumed that the product of two squares is the same as the square of the two products:
$$K_f sqrtleft(fracF_maxcdot Lcdot yI_uright)^2left(fract^-11right)^2 +3left(fracV_maxLright)^2left(fract^-11right)^2$$
Now I am not sure what to do with the terms with the $mathbf t$ in it. Would someone be able to help me out in getting both the $mathbf K_f$ and $mathbf t$ outside of the square root?
algebra-precalculus
algebra-precalculus
asked Sep 4 at 7:32
david_10001
225
225
1
Your assumption is correct: the product of two squares is the same as the square of the product. Even more appropriately in this case, the square root of a product is the product of the square roots of the factors. The additional piece that you need is that $t^-2$ is a common factor of the terms of the sum, so you can use the distributive law to pull it out as one factor of the product - then you can apply the square root to each factor.
â NickD
Sep 4 at 12:21
add a comment |Â
1
Your assumption is correct: the product of two squares is the same as the square of the product. Even more appropriately in this case, the square root of a product is the product of the square roots of the factors. The additional piece that you need is that $t^-2$ is a common factor of the terms of the sum, so you can use the distributive law to pull it out as one factor of the product - then you can apply the square root to each factor.
â NickD
Sep 4 at 12:21
1
1
Your assumption is correct: the product of two squares is the same as the square of the product. Even more appropriately in this case, the square root of a product is the product of the square roots of the factors. The additional piece that you need is that $t^-2$ is a common factor of the terms of the sum, so you can use the distributive law to pull it out as one factor of the product - then you can apply the square root to each factor.
â NickD
Sep 4 at 12:21
Your assumption is correct: the product of two squares is the same as the square of the product. Even more appropriately in this case, the square root of a product is the product of the square roots of the factors. The additional piece that you need is that $t^-2$ is a common factor of the terms of the sum, so you can use the distributive law to pull it out as one factor of the product - then you can apply the square root to each factor.
â NickD
Sep 4 at 12:21
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
You have an expression of the form
$$Ksqrtleft(fracAtright)^2+left(fracBtright)^2.$$
You can expand the squares, then take the $t$ as common denominator, and then use that the square root of a product is the product of the square roots:
$$Ksqrtleft(fracAtright)^2+left(fracBtright)^2=KsqrtfracA^2t^2+fracB^2t^2=KsqrtfracA^2+B^2t^2=KfracsqrtA^2+B^2sqrtt^2=KfracsqrtA^2+B^2t=fracKtsqrtA^2+B^2.$$
Here I'm suppossing that $tgeq0$, so that $sqrtt^2=|t|=t$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
In both terms, $t$ appears at the denominator, which is squared. If you pull it out of the square root, the square is just cancelled and $t$ remains at the denominator $(-2cdotdfrac12=-1$).
$$K_f sqrtleft(fracF_maxcdot Lcdot ytcdot I_uright)^2 +3left(fracV_maxtcdot Lright)^2=fracK_ft sqrtleft(fracF_maxcdot Lcdot y I_uright)^2 +3left(fracV_maxLright)^2.$$
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
You have an expression of the form
$$Ksqrtleft(fracAtright)^2+left(fracBtright)^2.$$
You can expand the squares, then take the $t$ as common denominator, and then use that the square root of a product is the product of the square roots:
$$Ksqrtleft(fracAtright)^2+left(fracBtright)^2=KsqrtfracA^2t^2+fracB^2t^2=KsqrtfracA^2+B^2t^2=KfracsqrtA^2+B^2sqrtt^2=KfracsqrtA^2+B^2t=fracKtsqrtA^2+B^2.$$
Here I'm suppossing that $tgeq0$, so that $sqrtt^2=|t|=t$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
You have an expression of the form
$$Ksqrtleft(fracAtright)^2+left(fracBtright)^2.$$
You can expand the squares, then take the $t$ as common denominator, and then use that the square root of a product is the product of the square roots:
$$Ksqrtleft(fracAtright)^2+left(fracBtright)^2=KsqrtfracA^2t^2+fracB^2t^2=KsqrtfracA^2+B^2t^2=KfracsqrtA^2+B^2sqrtt^2=KfracsqrtA^2+B^2t=fracKtsqrtA^2+B^2.$$
Here I'm suppossing that $tgeq0$, so that $sqrtt^2=|t|=t$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
You have an expression of the form
$$Ksqrtleft(fracAtright)^2+left(fracBtright)^2.$$
You can expand the squares, then take the $t$ as common denominator, and then use that the square root of a product is the product of the square roots:
$$Ksqrtleft(fracAtright)^2+left(fracBtright)^2=KsqrtfracA^2t^2+fracB^2t^2=KsqrtfracA^2+B^2t^2=KfracsqrtA^2+B^2sqrtt^2=KfracsqrtA^2+B^2t=fracKtsqrtA^2+B^2.$$
Here I'm suppossing that $tgeq0$, so that $sqrtt^2=|t|=t$.
You have an expression of the form
$$Ksqrtleft(fracAtright)^2+left(fracBtright)^2.$$
You can expand the squares, then take the $t$ as common denominator, and then use that the square root of a product is the product of the square roots:
$$Ksqrtleft(fracAtright)^2+left(fracBtright)^2=KsqrtfracA^2t^2+fracB^2t^2=KsqrtfracA^2+B^2t^2=KfracsqrtA^2+B^2sqrtt^2=KfracsqrtA^2+B^2t=fracKtsqrtA^2+B^2.$$
Here I'm suppossing that $tgeq0$, so that $sqrtt^2=|t|=t$.
edited Sep 4 at 7:58
answered Sep 4 at 7:45
Jose Brox
2,2681921
2,2681921
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
In both terms, $t$ appears at the denominator, which is squared. If you pull it out of the square root, the square is just cancelled and $t$ remains at the denominator $(-2cdotdfrac12=-1$).
$$K_f sqrtleft(fracF_maxcdot Lcdot ytcdot I_uright)^2 +3left(fracV_maxtcdot Lright)^2=fracK_ft sqrtleft(fracF_maxcdot Lcdot y I_uright)^2 +3left(fracV_maxLright)^2.$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
In both terms, $t$ appears at the denominator, which is squared. If you pull it out of the square root, the square is just cancelled and $t$ remains at the denominator $(-2cdotdfrac12=-1$).
$$K_f sqrtleft(fracF_maxcdot Lcdot ytcdot I_uright)^2 +3left(fracV_maxtcdot Lright)^2=fracK_ft sqrtleft(fracF_maxcdot Lcdot y I_uright)^2 +3left(fracV_maxLright)^2.$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
In both terms, $t$ appears at the denominator, which is squared. If you pull it out of the square root, the square is just cancelled and $t$ remains at the denominator $(-2cdotdfrac12=-1$).
$$K_f sqrtleft(fracF_maxcdot Lcdot ytcdot I_uright)^2 +3left(fracV_maxtcdot Lright)^2=fracK_ft sqrtleft(fracF_maxcdot Lcdot y I_uright)^2 +3left(fracV_maxLright)^2.$$
In both terms, $t$ appears at the denominator, which is squared. If you pull it out of the square root, the square is just cancelled and $t$ remains at the denominator $(-2cdotdfrac12=-1$).
$$K_f sqrtleft(fracF_maxcdot Lcdot ytcdot I_uright)^2 +3left(fracV_maxtcdot Lright)^2=fracK_ft sqrtleft(fracF_maxcdot Lcdot y I_uright)^2 +3left(fracV_maxLright)^2.$$
answered Sep 4 at 8:01
Yves Daoust
114k666209
114k666209
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2904741%2fhow-to-rearrange-this-square-root-so-a-denominator-is-out-the-front%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
1
Your assumption is correct: the product of two squares is the same as the square of the product. Even more appropriately in this case, the square root of a product is the product of the square roots of the factors. The additional piece that you need is that $t^-2$ is a common factor of the terms of the sum, so you can use the distributive law to pull it out as one factor of the product - then you can apply the square root to each factor.
â NickD
Sep 4 at 12:21