Is it rude to ask the lecturer whether there is any “effective prerequisite”?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
33
down vote

favorite
2












Situation: My university has an online course registration system. Students (including me) choose courses in the system and submit their requests at certain time.



Sometimes, the course information is not detailed enough. A lot of course information in the catalog contains no or unreasonable prerequisite. For example, no prerequisite is listed in the information of a MATH 4000-level (fourth-year) course about real analysis. Another example is that a CSCI 4000-level course about cloud computing has a very minimal prerequisite course (something like an introductory OS course).



I am not sure whether it would be rude to email the lecturer in advance, asking whether there is any prerequisite not stated in the online system. While I am feeling OK to ask the lecturer if none of the “effective prerequisite” is stated for a 4000-level course (as I believe there must be some), I feel a bit sorry in the second case because it appears that I don’t trust the department’s course director and I chose to, in some sense, challenge the lecturer.



I did send an email asking the prerequisite of the cloud computing course. Initially I expected the lecturer to require me to have some basic knowledge about, e.g. graph theory, database system etc. He replied to me that there is no other prerequisite, though. For some other reasons I decided not to take that course, but I think similar situations may appear in future.



Any help is appreciated.










share|improve this question



















  • 31




    Perhaps explain what "4000-level" course means, I presume fourth year, but I'm guessing.
    – user2768
    Sep 4 at 7:11






  • 3




    I did this once and got an annoyed response "If it had any other prerequisites, they'd be listed." Most people should be fine with it tho
    – Azor Ahai
    Sep 4 at 16:47






  • 3




    What exactly is your goal? Are you worried they'll kick you out because you "don't fulfill the prerequisite"? Or are you worried it will be too hard because it will be designed with the assumption that everyone took a certain course that you haven't?
    – Trusly
    Sep 5 at 2:06










  • I do this at the beginning of almost each semester. Up until now, I have gotten responses to almost every one of my mails, so I do not think there is something wrong in doing that.
    – onurcanbektas
    Sep 6 at 10:01










  • @user2768 yes you’re right...my university uses a 4-digit course code system.
    – tonychow0929
    Sep 6 at 13:14














up vote
33
down vote

favorite
2












Situation: My university has an online course registration system. Students (including me) choose courses in the system and submit their requests at certain time.



Sometimes, the course information is not detailed enough. A lot of course information in the catalog contains no or unreasonable prerequisite. For example, no prerequisite is listed in the information of a MATH 4000-level (fourth-year) course about real analysis. Another example is that a CSCI 4000-level course about cloud computing has a very minimal prerequisite course (something like an introductory OS course).



I am not sure whether it would be rude to email the lecturer in advance, asking whether there is any prerequisite not stated in the online system. While I am feeling OK to ask the lecturer if none of the “effective prerequisite” is stated for a 4000-level course (as I believe there must be some), I feel a bit sorry in the second case because it appears that I don’t trust the department’s course director and I chose to, in some sense, challenge the lecturer.



I did send an email asking the prerequisite of the cloud computing course. Initially I expected the lecturer to require me to have some basic knowledge about, e.g. graph theory, database system etc. He replied to me that there is no other prerequisite, though. For some other reasons I decided not to take that course, but I think similar situations may appear in future.



Any help is appreciated.










share|improve this question



















  • 31




    Perhaps explain what "4000-level" course means, I presume fourth year, but I'm guessing.
    – user2768
    Sep 4 at 7:11






  • 3




    I did this once and got an annoyed response "If it had any other prerequisites, they'd be listed." Most people should be fine with it tho
    – Azor Ahai
    Sep 4 at 16:47






  • 3




    What exactly is your goal? Are you worried they'll kick you out because you "don't fulfill the prerequisite"? Or are you worried it will be too hard because it will be designed with the assumption that everyone took a certain course that you haven't?
    – Trusly
    Sep 5 at 2:06










  • I do this at the beginning of almost each semester. Up until now, I have gotten responses to almost every one of my mails, so I do not think there is something wrong in doing that.
    – onurcanbektas
    Sep 6 at 10:01










  • @user2768 yes you’re right...my university uses a 4-digit course code system.
    – tonychow0929
    Sep 6 at 13:14












up vote
33
down vote

favorite
2









up vote
33
down vote

favorite
2






2





Situation: My university has an online course registration system. Students (including me) choose courses in the system and submit their requests at certain time.



Sometimes, the course information is not detailed enough. A lot of course information in the catalog contains no or unreasonable prerequisite. For example, no prerequisite is listed in the information of a MATH 4000-level (fourth-year) course about real analysis. Another example is that a CSCI 4000-level course about cloud computing has a very minimal prerequisite course (something like an introductory OS course).



I am not sure whether it would be rude to email the lecturer in advance, asking whether there is any prerequisite not stated in the online system. While I am feeling OK to ask the lecturer if none of the “effective prerequisite” is stated for a 4000-level course (as I believe there must be some), I feel a bit sorry in the second case because it appears that I don’t trust the department’s course director and I chose to, in some sense, challenge the lecturer.



I did send an email asking the prerequisite of the cloud computing course. Initially I expected the lecturer to require me to have some basic knowledge about, e.g. graph theory, database system etc. He replied to me that there is no other prerequisite, though. For some other reasons I decided not to take that course, but I think similar situations may appear in future.



Any help is appreciated.










share|improve this question















Situation: My university has an online course registration system. Students (including me) choose courses in the system and submit their requests at certain time.



Sometimes, the course information is not detailed enough. A lot of course information in the catalog contains no or unreasonable prerequisite. For example, no prerequisite is listed in the information of a MATH 4000-level (fourth-year) course about real analysis. Another example is that a CSCI 4000-level course about cloud computing has a very minimal prerequisite course (something like an introductory OS course).



I am not sure whether it would be rude to email the lecturer in advance, asking whether there is any prerequisite not stated in the online system. While I am feeling OK to ask the lecturer if none of the “effective prerequisite” is stated for a 4000-level course (as I believe there must be some), I feel a bit sorry in the second case because it appears that I don’t trust the department’s course director and I chose to, in some sense, challenge the lecturer.



I did send an email asking the prerequisite of the cloud computing course. Initially I expected the lecturer to require me to have some basic knowledge about, e.g. graph theory, database system etc. He replied to me that there is no other prerequisite, though. For some other reasons I decided not to take that course, but I think similar situations may appear in future.



Any help is appreciated.







email course-design






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Sep 7 at 7:54









user2768

6,55612035




6,55612035










asked Sep 4 at 4:12









tonychow0929

26825




26825







  • 31




    Perhaps explain what "4000-level" course means, I presume fourth year, but I'm guessing.
    – user2768
    Sep 4 at 7:11






  • 3




    I did this once and got an annoyed response "If it had any other prerequisites, they'd be listed." Most people should be fine with it tho
    – Azor Ahai
    Sep 4 at 16:47






  • 3




    What exactly is your goal? Are you worried they'll kick you out because you "don't fulfill the prerequisite"? Or are you worried it will be too hard because it will be designed with the assumption that everyone took a certain course that you haven't?
    – Trusly
    Sep 5 at 2:06










  • I do this at the beginning of almost each semester. Up until now, I have gotten responses to almost every one of my mails, so I do not think there is something wrong in doing that.
    – onurcanbektas
    Sep 6 at 10:01










  • @user2768 yes you’re right...my university uses a 4-digit course code system.
    – tonychow0929
    Sep 6 at 13:14












  • 31




    Perhaps explain what "4000-level" course means, I presume fourth year, but I'm guessing.
    – user2768
    Sep 4 at 7:11






  • 3




    I did this once and got an annoyed response "If it had any other prerequisites, they'd be listed." Most people should be fine with it tho
    – Azor Ahai
    Sep 4 at 16:47






  • 3




    What exactly is your goal? Are you worried they'll kick you out because you "don't fulfill the prerequisite"? Or are you worried it will be too hard because it will be designed with the assumption that everyone took a certain course that you haven't?
    – Trusly
    Sep 5 at 2:06










  • I do this at the beginning of almost each semester. Up until now, I have gotten responses to almost every one of my mails, so I do not think there is something wrong in doing that.
    – onurcanbektas
    Sep 6 at 10:01










  • @user2768 yes you’re right...my university uses a 4-digit course code system.
    – tonychow0929
    Sep 6 at 13:14







31




31




Perhaps explain what "4000-level" course means, I presume fourth year, but I'm guessing.
– user2768
Sep 4 at 7:11




Perhaps explain what "4000-level" course means, I presume fourth year, but I'm guessing.
– user2768
Sep 4 at 7:11




3




3




I did this once and got an annoyed response "If it had any other prerequisites, they'd be listed." Most people should be fine with it tho
– Azor Ahai
Sep 4 at 16:47




I did this once and got an annoyed response "If it had any other prerequisites, they'd be listed." Most people should be fine with it tho
– Azor Ahai
Sep 4 at 16:47




3




3




What exactly is your goal? Are you worried they'll kick you out because you "don't fulfill the prerequisite"? Or are you worried it will be too hard because it will be designed with the assumption that everyone took a certain course that you haven't?
– Trusly
Sep 5 at 2:06




What exactly is your goal? Are you worried they'll kick you out because you "don't fulfill the prerequisite"? Or are you worried it will be too hard because it will be designed with the assumption that everyone took a certain course that you haven't?
– Trusly
Sep 5 at 2:06












I do this at the beginning of almost each semester. Up until now, I have gotten responses to almost every one of my mails, so I do not think there is something wrong in doing that.
– onurcanbektas
Sep 6 at 10:01




I do this at the beginning of almost each semester. Up until now, I have gotten responses to almost every one of my mails, so I do not think there is something wrong in doing that.
– onurcanbektas
Sep 6 at 10:01












@user2768 yes you’re right...my university uses a 4-digit course code system.
– tonychow0929
Sep 6 at 13:14




@user2768 yes you’re right...my university uses a 4-digit course code system.
– tonychow0929
Sep 6 at 13:14










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
100
down vote



accepted










I wouldn't phrase it in terms of "effective prerequisites". But it's certainly fine to discuss with the professor whether you are adequately prepared. You could visit their office hours, or send an email:




Dear Professor So-And-So:



I am interested in taking your course MATH 4321. I see that no prerequisites are listed, but I was wondering what background knowledge is expected, and whether I'd be ready for this course. I've taken related courses X, Y, Z and feel comfortable with the material from those courses, and have also had some experience with topic Q. Does this seem sufficient? If you can recommend specific topics to review, or additional reading, I would appreciate it. Or, if there are other courses I should take first, that would also be helpful to know.




If you like you can attach a copy of your transcript.






share|improve this answer
















  • 6




    Conversely, I have had success with getting away with not having taken explicit prerequisites. The message is much the same: I noticed prereq ABC, I've taken X, Y, Z which I think is similar, is that sufficient and if not, would it be possible to do independent reading over the summer to prepare myself? For a lower-level course (like 200s-level), that is sometimes sufficient. In both cases, it's a similar fundamental idea: the prof knows best, and it's okay to discuss your specific case with them.
    – yshavit
    Sep 5 at 19:09







  • 1




    @yshavit: Thanks for pointing this out. Indeed, the professor almost always has the authority to waive prerequisites, and as you say, they are often willing to do so if you make a reasonable case.
    – Nate Eldredge
    Sep 5 at 20:12


















up vote
34
down vote













Think about this from the lecturer's point of view. If you are the lecturer, would you rather:



  1. Have a student email you about what the prerequisites are and whether she meets them, or

  2. Have a student not email you, enroll, then find out she cannot understand what you are saying at all?

I think most reasonable people would prefer #1. If you are concerned about overpressing and appearing rude that way (e.g. responding to your CS professor with "are you seriously saying this level 4000 CS course has no prerequisites except this very basic OS course??") then you could also ask for details such as the textbook used or perhaps look through homework/tutorials/past-year exam papers, and gauge the level of the course that way.






share|improve this answer



























    up vote
    12
    down vote













    Its worth noting that some universities attempt to automatically enforce pre-requisites either by machine or by administrative review at the time of enrollment. Some professors may not want formal prerequisites because they can create administrative barriers to enrollment for a student that may have all the necessary knowledge without having some specific course listed on the transcript.



    I smacked into this problem from the other side as a student at a University that administratively enforced pre-requisites and where the professors tended to list them explicitly and exactly. I spent a lot of time running around getting professors to sign forms authorizing me to take classes without having the formal prerequisites and it was annoying for me, my adviser that had to process it, and the professors.



    With that said, I think asking about "effective prerequisites" using those words might either seem a bit of a challenge to a professor or possibly confuse them as to exactly what you mean. I suspect asking them what prior knowledge is assumed or asking for recommended prior reading is likely to get a positive response.



    You can also probably get some idea of whether the class is too advanced or not by flipping through the textbook. If the first couple of chapters make sense you are probably fine. If you encounter unfamiliar terminology and concepts you consider difficult in the first couple of chapters then you should either wait on the class or do some independent study first.






    share|improve this answer
















    • 3




      +1 for "You can also probably get some idea of whether the class is too advanced or not by flipping through the textbook." When I was in college this seemed obvious to me, and I grew up in a fairly rural area (before the internet) and thus was probably a lot less knowledgable about certain things than many others (such as the fact that test prep for ACT and SAT tests was NOT confined a few percent of students who were rich and had private tutors and such). For this reason, I find it curious that this isn't done more often, or at least an explanation in the question for why this didn't work.
      – Dave L Renfro
      Sep 4 at 17:56






    • 1




      That said, I think in this particular case the OP is more concerned about what appears to be errors in the on-line listing of prerequisites, but I'm not entirely sure of this interpretation. And if that's not the case, then maybe simply googling for a recent syllabus for the course is all the OP needs to do, rather than trying to find a copy of the textbook. (University bookstores are not as stocked as they used to be, especially regarding textbooks from past-taught courses.) In spite of all this, Nate Eldredge's answer seems best to me, at least for the math course.
      – Dave L Renfro
      Sep 4 at 18:04


















    up vote
    8
    down vote














    Sometimes, the course information is not detailed enough. A lot of course information in the catalog contains no or unreasonable prerequisite.




    Many courses are self-contained and should be accessible to any student that has studied the discipline in preceding years.




    I am not sure whether it would be rude to email the lecturer in advance, asking whether there is any prerequisite not stated in the online system.




    Suggesting that the lecturer was too lazy to list prerequisites is rude. Asking whether there is any reading that they would recommend is not rude, and should be encouraged.



    The main idea is to ask for recommended reading, rather than required reading, because the latter invites conflict by implicitly suggesting that the lecturer didn't list some required reading, whereas the former invites a friendly reply.




    I did send an email asking the prerequisite of the cloud computing course. Initially I expected the lecturer to require me to have some basic knowledge about, e.g. graph theory, database system etc. He replied to me that there is no other prerequisite, though.




    You seem sceptical of your teachers, possibly unnecessarily.



    TL;DR: Course information should be assumed correct; incorrect information isn't beneficial. Asking for additional reading should be encouraged.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 10




      If OP doesn't necessarily fit the profile of the typical student who would be taking said course, I think it's perfectly reasonable to ask. OP doesn't say what 4000 level means, but if it means 4th year course, and OP isn't a 4th year maths major, there could be implicit prerequisites that OP lacks but every 4th year maths major would have. In this particular case (real analysis), it would be very typical for the course to have no logical prerequisites, while still being practically incomprehensible to someone without the appropriate mathematical maturity.
      – SolveIt
      Sep 4 at 13:55










    • Presumably, the online course registration system doesn't support registration of such students. Such students would probably be contacting staff directly and possibly attending informally, e.g., a fourth year physics student might attend courses (without registering) for fourth year maths students (possibly after asking the instructor whether they mind).
      – user2768
      Sep 4 at 15:15






    • 5




      "Presumably, the online course registration system doesn't support registration of such students." You assume the course registration system is infallible.
      – JAB
      Sep 4 at 16:27






    • 1




      @user2768 most systems only go by the prerequisites. My college only used previous courses. For this reason many courses had somewhat irrelevant lower courses as prerequisites as they were required for those majors anyway and it ensured that people weren't taking the courses with absolutely no background in the field.
      – The Great Duck
      Sep 5 at 3:45











    • @JAB I wrote "doesn't support," that's a form of failure. (As I mentioned, the system is limited, e.g., as per the fourth year physics student that I mentioned.)
      – user2768
      Sep 5 at 7:59


















    up vote
    1
    down vote













    I've actually had one of my students start asking this of professors when they enroll for courses. Many courses have implicit background classes - and for graduate classes, there is often an assumed background in the field. Memorably, he had a class where the lecturer frequently began statements with "As you will remember from your undergraduate coursework..." - something of a problem if you didn't have said coursework.



    Emailing the professor to discuss your background and chances of successfully doing the coursework has, in my experience, been highly productive.






    share|improve this answer




















      Your Answer







      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "415"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: false,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f116339%2fis-it-rude-to-ask-the-lecturer-whether-there-is-any-effective-prerequisite%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest






























      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes








      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      100
      down vote



      accepted










      I wouldn't phrase it in terms of "effective prerequisites". But it's certainly fine to discuss with the professor whether you are adequately prepared. You could visit their office hours, or send an email:




      Dear Professor So-And-So:



      I am interested in taking your course MATH 4321. I see that no prerequisites are listed, but I was wondering what background knowledge is expected, and whether I'd be ready for this course. I've taken related courses X, Y, Z and feel comfortable with the material from those courses, and have also had some experience with topic Q. Does this seem sufficient? If you can recommend specific topics to review, or additional reading, I would appreciate it. Or, if there are other courses I should take first, that would also be helpful to know.




      If you like you can attach a copy of your transcript.






      share|improve this answer
















      • 6




        Conversely, I have had success with getting away with not having taken explicit prerequisites. The message is much the same: I noticed prereq ABC, I've taken X, Y, Z which I think is similar, is that sufficient and if not, would it be possible to do independent reading over the summer to prepare myself? For a lower-level course (like 200s-level), that is sometimes sufficient. In both cases, it's a similar fundamental idea: the prof knows best, and it's okay to discuss your specific case with them.
        – yshavit
        Sep 5 at 19:09







      • 1




        @yshavit: Thanks for pointing this out. Indeed, the professor almost always has the authority to waive prerequisites, and as you say, they are often willing to do so if you make a reasonable case.
        – Nate Eldredge
        Sep 5 at 20:12















      up vote
      100
      down vote



      accepted










      I wouldn't phrase it in terms of "effective prerequisites". But it's certainly fine to discuss with the professor whether you are adequately prepared. You could visit their office hours, or send an email:




      Dear Professor So-And-So:



      I am interested in taking your course MATH 4321. I see that no prerequisites are listed, but I was wondering what background knowledge is expected, and whether I'd be ready for this course. I've taken related courses X, Y, Z and feel comfortable with the material from those courses, and have also had some experience with topic Q. Does this seem sufficient? If you can recommend specific topics to review, or additional reading, I would appreciate it. Or, if there are other courses I should take first, that would also be helpful to know.




      If you like you can attach a copy of your transcript.






      share|improve this answer
















      • 6




        Conversely, I have had success with getting away with not having taken explicit prerequisites. The message is much the same: I noticed prereq ABC, I've taken X, Y, Z which I think is similar, is that sufficient and if not, would it be possible to do independent reading over the summer to prepare myself? For a lower-level course (like 200s-level), that is sometimes sufficient. In both cases, it's a similar fundamental idea: the prof knows best, and it's okay to discuss your specific case with them.
        – yshavit
        Sep 5 at 19:09







      • 1




        @yshavit: Thanks for pointing this out. Indeed, the professor almost always has the authority to waive prerequisites, and as you say, they are often willing to do so if you make a reasonable case.
        – Nate Eldredge
        Sep 5 at 20:12













      up vote
      100
      down vote



      accepted







      up vote
      100
      down vote



      accepted






      I wouldn't phrase it in terms of "effective prerequisites". But it's certainly fine to discuss with the professor whether you are adequately prepared. You could visit their office hours, or send an email:




      Dear Professor So-And-So:



      I am interested in taking your course MATH 4321. I see that no prerequisites are listed, but I was wondering what background knowledge is expected, and whether I'd be ready for this course. I've taken related courses X, Y, Z and feel comfortable with the material from those courses, and have also had some experience with topic Q. Does this seem sufficient? If you can recommend specific topics to review, or additional reading, I would appreciate it. Or, if there are other courses I should take first, that would also be helpful to know.




      If you like you can attach a copy of your transcript.






      share|improve this answer












      I wouldn't phrase it in terms of "effective prerequisites". But it's certainly fine to discuss with the professor whether you are adequately prepared. You could visit their office hours, or send an email:




      Dear Professor So-And-So:



      I am interested in taking your course MATH 4321. I see that no prerequisites are listed, but I was wondering what background knowledge is expected, and whether I'd be ready for this course. I've taken related courses X, Y, Z and feel comfortable with the material from those courses, and have also had some experience with topic Q. Does this seem sufficient? If you can recommend specific topics to review, or additional reading, I would appreciate it. Or, if there are other courses I should take first, that would also be helpful to know.




      If you like you can attach a copy of your transcript.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered Sep 4 at 13:58









      Nate Eldredge

      97.1k29270375




      97.1k29270375







      • 6




        Conversely, I have had success with getting away with not having taken explicit prerequisites. The message is much the same: I noticed prereq ABC, I've taken X, Y, Z which I think is similar, is that sufficient and if not, would it be possible to do independent reading over the summer to prepare myself? For a lower-level course (like 200s-level), that is sometimes sufficient. In both cases, it's a similar fundamental idea: the prof knows best, and it's okay to discuss your specific case with them.
        – yshavit
        Sep 5 at 19:09







      • 1




        @yshavit: Thanks for pointing this out. Indeed, the professor almost always has the authority to waive prerequisites, and as you say, they are often willing to do so if you make a reasonable case.
        – Nate Eldredge
        Sep 5 at 20:12













      • 6




        Conversely, I have had success with getting away with not having taken explicit prerequisites. The message is much the same: I noticed prereq ABC, I've taken X, Y, Z which I think is similar, is that sufficient and if not, would it be possible to do independent reading over the summer to prepare myself? For a lower-level course (like 200s-level), that is sometimes sufficient. In both cases, it's a similar fundamental idea: the prof knows best, and it's okay to discuss your specific case with them.
        – yshavit
        Sep 5 at 19:09







      • 1




        @yshavit: Thanks for pointing this out. Indeed, the professor almost always has the authority to waive prerequisites, and as you say, they are often willing to do so if you make a reasonable case.
        – Nate Eldredge
        Sep 5 at 20:12








      6




      6




      Conversely, I have had success with getting away with not having taken explicit prerequisites. The message is much the same: I noticed prereq ABC, I've taken X, Y, Z which I think is similar, is that sufficient and if not, would it be possible to do independent reading over the summer to prepare myself? For a lower-level course (like 200s-level), that is sometimes sufficient. In both cases, it's a similar fundamental idea: the prof knows best, and it's okay to discuss your specific case with them.
      – yshavit
      Sep 5 at 19:09





      Conversely, I have had success with getting away with not having taken explicit prerequisites. The message is much the same: I noticed prereq ABC, I've taken X, Y, Z which I think is similar, is that sufficient and if not, would it be possible to do independent reading over the summer to prepare myself? For a lower-level course (like 200s-level), that is sometimes sufficient. In both cases, it's a similar fundamental idea: the prof knows best, and it's okay to discuss your specific case with them.
      – yshavit
      Sep 5 at 19:09





      1




      1




      @yshavit: Thanks for pointing this out. Indeed, the professor almost always has the authority to waive prerequisites, and as you say, they are often willing to do so if you make a reasonable case.
      – Nate Eldredge
      Sep 5 at 20:12





      @yshavit: Thanks for pointing this out. Indeed, the professor almost always has the authority to waive prerequisites, and as you say, they are often willing to do so if you make a reasonable case.
      – Nate Eldredge
      Sep 5 at 20:12











      up vote
      34
      down vote













      Think about this from the lecturer's point of view. If you are the lecturer, would you rather:



      1. Have a student email you about what the prerequisites are and whether she meets them, or

      2. Have a student not email you, enroll, then find out she cannot understand what you are saying at all?

      I think most reasonable people would prefer #1. If you are concerned about overpressing and appearing rude that way (e.g. responding to your CS professor with "are you seriously saying this level 4000 CS course has no prerequisites except this very basic OS course??") then you could also ask for details such as the textbook used or perhaps look through homework/tutorials/past-year exam papers, and gauge the level of the course that way.






      share|improve this answer
























        up vote
        34
        down vote













        Think about this from the lecturer's point of view. If you are the lecturer, would you rather:



        1. Have a student email you about what the prerequisites are and whether she meets them, or

        2. Have a student not email you, enroll, then find out she cannot understand what you are saying at all?

        I think most reasonable people would prefer #1. If you are concerned about overpressing and appearing rude that way (e.g. responding to your CS professor with "are you seriously saying this level 4000 CS course has no prerequisites except this very basic OS course??") then you could also ask for details such as the textbook used or perhaps look through homework/tutorials/past-year exam papers, and gauge the level of the course that way.






        share|improve this answer






















          up vote
          34
          down vote










          up vote
          34
          down vote









          Think about this from the lecturer's point of view. If you are the lecturer, would you rather:



          1. Have a student email you about what the prerequisites are and whether she meets them, or

          2. Have a student not email you, enroll, then find out she cannot understand what you are saying at all?

          I think most reasonable people would prefer #1. If you are concerned about overpressing and appearing rude that way (e.g. responding to your CS professor with "are you seriously saying this level 4000 CS course has no prerequisites except this very basic OS course??") then you could also ask for details such as the textbook used or perhaps look through homework/tutorials/past-year exam papers, and gauge the level of the course that way.






          share|improve this answer












          Think about this from the lecturer's point of view. If you are the lecturer, would you rather:



          1. Have a student email you about what the prerequisites are and whether she meets them, or

          2. Have a student not email you, enroll, then find out she cannot understand what you are saying at all?

          I think most reasonable people would prefer #1. If you are concerned about overpressing and appearing rude that way (e.g. responding to your CS professor with "are you seriously saying this level 4000 CS course has no prerequisites except this very basic OS course??") then you could also ask for details such as the textbook used or perhaps look through homework/tutorials/past-year exam papers, and gauge the level of the course that way.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Sep 4 at 4:21









          Allure

          17k1258102




          17k1258102




















              up vote
              12
              down vote













              Its worth noting that some universities attempt to automatically enforce pre-requisites either by machine or by administrative review at the time of enrollment. Some professors may not want formal prerequisites because they can create administrative barriers to enrollment for a student that may have all the necessary knowledge without having some specific course listed on the transcript.



              I smacked into this problem from the other side as a student at a University that administratively enforced pre-requisites and where the professors tended to list them explicitly and exactly. I spent a lot of time running around getting professors to sign forms authorizing me to take classes without having the formal prerequisites and it was annoying for me, my adviser that had to process it, and the professors.



              With that said, I think asking about "effective prerequisites" using those words might either seem a bit of a challenge to a professor or possibly confuse them as to exactly what you mean. I suspect asking them what prior knowledge is assumed or asking for recommended prior reading is likely to get a positive response.



              You can also probably get some idea of whether the class is too advanced or not by flipping through the textbook. If the first couple of chapters make sense you are probably fine. If you encounter unfamiliar terminology and concepts you consider difficult in the first couple of chapters then you should either wait on the class or do some independent study first.






              share|improve this answer
















              • 3




                +1 for "You can also probably get some idea of whether the class is too advanced or not by flipping through the textbook." When I was in college this seemed obvious to me, and I grew up in a fairly rural area (before the internet) and thus was probably a lot less knowledgable about certain things than many others (such as the fact that test prep for ACT and SAT tests was NOT confined a few percent of students who were rich and had private tutors and such). For this reason, I find it curious that this isn't done more often, or at least an explanation in the question for why this didn't work.
                – Dave L Renfro
                Sep 4 at 17:56






              • 1




                That said, I think in this particular case the OP is more concerned about what appears to be errors in the on-line listing of prerequisites, but I'm not entirely sure of this interpretation. And if that's not the case, then maybe simply googling for a recent syllabus for the course is all the OP needs to do, rather than trying to find a copy of the textbook. (University bookstores are not as stocked as they used to be, especially regarding textbooks from past-taught courses.) In spite of all this, Nate Eldredge's answer seems best to me, at least for the math course.
                – Dave L Renfro
                Sep 4 at 18:04















              up vote
              12
              down vote













              Its worth noting that some universities attempt to automatically enforce pre-requisites either by machine or by administrative review at the time of enrollment. Some professors may not want formal prerequisites because they can create administrative barriers to enrollment for a student that may have all the necessary knowledge without having some specific course listed on the transcript.



              I smacked into this problem from the other side as a student at a University that administratively enforced pre-requisites and where the professors tended to list them explicitly and exactly. I spent a lot of time running around getting professors to sign forms authorizing me to take classes without having the formal prerequisites and it was annoying for me, my adviser that had to process it, and the professors.



              With that said, I think asking about "effective prerequisites" using those words might either seem a bit of a challenge to a professor or possibly confuse them as to exactly what you mean. I suspect asking them what prior knowledge is assumed or asking for recommended prior reading is likely to get a positive response.



              You can also probably get some idea of whether the class is too advanced or not by flipping through the textbook. If the first couple of chapters make sense you are probably fine. If you encounter unfamiliar terminology and concepts you consider difficult in the first couple of chapters then you should either wait on the class or do some independent study first.






              share|improve this answer
















              • 3




                +1 for "You can also probably get some idea of whether the class is too advanced or not by flipping through the textbook." When I was in college this seemed obvious to me, and I grew up in a fairly rural area (before the internet) and thus was probably a lot less knowledgable about certain things than many others (such as the fact that test prep for ACT and SAT tests was NOT confined a few percent of students who were rich and had private tutors and such). For this reason, I find it curious that this isn't done more often, or at least an explanation in the question for why this didn't work.
                – Dave L Renfro
                Sep 4 at 17:56






              • 1




                That said, I think in this particular case the OP is more concerned about what appears to be errors in the on-line listing of prerequisites, but I'm not entirely sure of this interpretation. And if that's not the case, then maybe simply googling for a recent syllabus for the course is all the OP needs to do, rather than trying to find a copy of the textbook. (University bookstores are not as stocked as they used to be, especially regarding textbooks from past-taught courses.) In spite of all this, Nate Eldredge's answer seems best to me, at least for the math course.
                – Dave L Renfro
                Sep 4 at 18:04













              up vote
              12
              down vote










              up vote
              12
              down vote









              Its worth noting that some universities attempt to automatically enforce pre-requisites either by machine or by administrative review at the time of enrollment. Some professors may not want formal prerequisites because they can create administrative barriers to enrollment for a student that may have all the necessary knowledge without having some specific course listed on the transcript.



              I smacked into this problem from the other side as a student at a University that administratively enforced pre-requisites and where the professors tended to list them explicitly and exactly. I spent a lot of time running around getting professors to sign forms authorizing me to take classes without having the formal prerequisites and it was annoying for me, my adviser that had to process it, and the professors.



              With that said, I think asking about "effective prerequisites" using those words might either seem a bit of a challenge to a professor or possibly confuse them as to exactly what you mean. I suspect asking them what prior knowledge is assumed or asking for recommended prior reading is likely to get a positive response.



              You can also probably get some idea of whether the class is too advanced or not by flipping through the textbook. If the first couple of chapters make sense you are probably fine. If you encounter unfamiliar terminology and concepts you consider difficult in the first couple of chapters then you should either wait on the class or do some independent study first.






              share|improve this answer












              Its worth noting that some universities attempt to automatically enforce pre-requisites either by machine or by administrative review at the time of enrollment. Some professors may not want formal prerequisites because they can create administrative barriers to enrollment for a student that may have all the necessary knowledge without having some specific course listed on the transcript.



              I smacked into this problem from the other side as a student at a University that administratively enforced pre-requisites and where the professors tended to list them explicitly and exactly. I spent a lot of time running around getting professors to sign forms authorizing me to take classes without having the formal prerequisites and it was annoying for me, my adviser that had to process it, and the professors.



              With that said, I think asking about "effective prerequisites" using those words might either seem a bit of a challenge to a professor or possibly confuse them as to exactly what you mean. I suspect asking them what prior knowledge is assumed or asking for recommended prior reading is likely to get a positive response.



              You can also probably get some idea of whether the class is too advanced or not by flipping through the textbook. If the first couple of chapters make sense you are probably fine. If you encounter unfamiliar terminology and concepts you consider difficult in the first couple of chapters then you should either wait on the class or do some independent study first.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Sep 4 at 17:06









              TimothyAWiseman

              22016




              22016







              • 3




                +1 for "You can also probably get some idea of whether the class is too advanced or not by flipping through the textbook." When I was in college this seemed obvious to me, and I grew up in a fairly rural area (before the internet) and thus was probably a lot less knowledgable about certain things than many others (such as the fact that test prep for ACT and SAT tests was NOT confined a few percent of students who were rich and had private tutors and such). For this reason, I find it curious that this isn't done more often, or at least an explanation in the question for why this didn't work.
                – Dave L Renfro
                Sep 4 at 17:56






              • 1




                That said, I think in this particular case the OP is more concerned about what appears to be errors in the on-line listing of prerequisites, but I'm not entirely sure of this interpretation. And if that's not the case, then maybe simply googling for a recent syllabus for the course is all the OP needs to do, rather than trying to find a copy of the textbook. (University bookstores are not as stocked as they used to be, especially regarding textbooks from past-taught courses.) In spite of all this, Nate Eldredge's answer seems best to me, at least for the math course.
                – Dave L Renfro
                Sep 4 at 18:04













              • 3




                +1 for "You can also probably get some idea of whether the class is too advanced or not by flipping through the textbook." When I was in college this seemed obvious to me, and I grew up in a fairly rural area (before the internet) and thus was probably a lot less knowledgable about certain things than many others (such as the fact that test prep for ACT and SAT tests was NOT confined a few percent of students who were rich and had private tutors and such). For this reason, I find it curious that this isn't done more often, or at least an explanation in the question for why this didn't work.
                – Dave L Renfro
                Sep 4 at 17:56






              • 1




                That said, I think in this particular case the OP is more concerned about what appears to be errors in the on-line listing of prerequisites, but I'm not entirely sure of this interpretation. And if that's not the case, then maybe simply googling for a recent syllabus for the course is all the OP needs to do, rather than trying to find a copy of the textbook. (University bookstores are not as stocked as they used to be, especially regarding textbooks from past-taught courses.) In spite of all this, Nate Eldredge's answer seems best to me, at least for the math course.
                – Dave L Renfro
                Sep 4 at 18:04








              3




              3




              +1 for "You can also probably get some idea of whether the class is too advanced or not by flipping through the textbook." When I was in college this seemed obvious to me, and I grew up in a fairly rural area (before the internet) and thus was probably a lot less knowledgable about certain things than many others (such as the fact that test prep for ACT and SAT tests was NOT confined a few percent of students who were rich and had private tutors and such). For this reason, I find it curious that this isn't done more often, or at least an explanation in the question for why this didn't work.
              – Dave L Renfro
              Sep 4 at 17:56




              +1 for "You can also probably get some idea of whether the class is too advanced or not by flipping through the textbook." When I was in college this seemed obvious to me, and I grew up in a fairly rural area (before the internet) and thus was probably a lot less knowledgable about certain things than many others (such as the fact that test prep for ACT and SAT tests was NOT confined a few percent of students who were rich and had private tutors and such). For this reason, I find it curious that this isn't done more often, or at least an explanation in the question for why this didn't work.
              – Dave L Renfro
              Sep 4 at 17:56




              1




              1




              That said, I think in this particular case the OP is more concerned about what appears to be errors in the on-line listing of prerequisites, but I'm not entirely sure of this interpretation. And if that's not the case, then maybe simply googling for a recent syllabus for the course is all the OP needs to do, rather than trying to find a copy of the textbook. (University bookstores are not as stocked as they used to be, especially regarding textbooks from past-taught courses.) In spite of all this, Nate Eldredge's answer seems best to me, at least for the math course.
              – Dave L Renfro
              Sep 4 at 18:04





              That said, I think in this particular case the OP is more concerned about what appears to be errors in the on-line listing of prerequisites, but I'm not entirely sure of this interpretation. And if that's not the case, then maybe simply googling for a recent syllabus for the course is all the OP needs to do, rather than trying to find a copy of the textbook. (University bookstores are not as stocked as they used to be, especially regarding textbooks from past-taught courses.) In spite of all this, Nate Eldredge's answer seems best to me, at least for the math course.
              – Dave L Renfro
              Sep 4 at 18:04











              up vote
              8
              down vote














              Sometimes, the course information is not detailed enough. A lot of course information in the catalog contains no or unreasonable prerequisite.




              Many courses are self-contained and should be accessible to any student that has studied the discipline in preceding years.




              I am not sure whether it would be rude to email the lecturer in advance, asking whether there is any prerequisite not stated in the online system.




              Suggesting that the lecturer was too lazy to list prerequisites is rude. Asking whether there is any reading that they would recommend is not rude, and should be encouraged.



              The main idea is to ask for recommended reading, rather than required reading, because the latter invites conflict by implicitly suggesting that the lecturer didn't list some required reading, whereas the former invites a friendly reply.




              I did send an email asking the prerequisite of the cloud computing course. Initially I expected the lecturer to require me to have some basic knowledge about, e.g. graph theory, database system etc. He replied to me that there is no other prerequisite, though.




              You seem sceptical of your teachers, possibly unnecessarily.



              TL;DR: Course information should be assumed correct; incorrect information isn't beneficial. Asking for additional reading should be encouraged.






              share|improve this answer


















              • 10




                If OP doesn't necessarily fit the profile of the typical student who would be taking said course, I think it's perfectly reasonable to ask. OP doesn't say what 4000 level means, but if it means 4th year course, and OP isn't a 4th year maths major, there could be implicit prerequisites that OP lacks but every 4th year maths major would have. In this particular case (real analysis), it would be very typical for the course to have no logical prerequisites, while still being practically incomprehensible to someone without the appropriate mathematical maturity.
                – SolveIt
                Sep 4 at 13:55










              • Presumably, the online course registration system doesn't support registration of such students. Such students would probably be contacting staff directly and possibly attending informally, e.g., a fourth year physics student might attend courses (without registering) for fourth year maths students (possibly after asking the instructor whether they mind).
                – user2768
                Sep 4 at 15:15






              • 5




                "Presumably, the online course registration system doesn't support registration of such students." You assume the course registration system is infallible.
                – JAB
                Sep 4 at 16:27






              • 1




                @user2768 most systems only go by the prerequisites. My college only used previous courses. For this reason many courses had somewhat irrelevant lower courses as prerequisites as they were required for those majors anyway and it ensured that people weren't taking the courses with absolutely no background in the field.
                – The Great Duck
                Sep 5 at 3:45











              • @JAB I wrote "doesn't support," that's a form of failure. (As I mentioned, the system is limited, e.g., as per the fourth year physics student that I mentioned.)
                – user2768
                Sep 5 at 7:59















              up vote
              8
              down vote














              Sometimes, the course information is not detailed enough. A lot of course information in the catalog contains no or unreasonable prerequisite.




              Many courses are self-contained and should be accessible to any student that has studied the discipline in preceding years.




              I am not sure whether it would be rude to email the lecturer in advance, asking whether there is any prerequisite not stated in the online system.




              Suggesting that the lecturer was too lazy to list prerequisites is rude. Asking whether there is any reading that they would recommend is not rude, and should be encouraged.



              The main idea is to ask for recommended reading, rather than required reading, because the latter invites conflict by implicitly suggesting that the lecturer didn't list some required reading, whereas the former invites a friendly reply.




              I did send an email asking the prerequisite of the cloud computing course. Initially I expected the lecturer to require me to have some basic knowledge about, e.g. graph theory, database system etc. He replied to me that there is no other prerequisite, though.




              You seem sceptical of your teachers, possibly unnecessarily.



              TL;DR: Course information should be assumed correct; incorrect information isn't beneficial. Asking for additional reading should be encouraged.






              share|improve this answer


















              • 10




                If OP doesn't necessarily fit the profile of the typical student who would be taking said course, I think it's perfectly reasonable to ask. OP doesn't say what 4000 level means, but if it means 4th year course, and OP isn't a 4th year maths major, there could be implicit prerequisites that OP lacks but every 4th year maths major would have. In this particular case (real analysis), it would be very typical for the course to have no logical prerequisites, while still being practically incomprehensible to someone without the appropriate mathematical maturity.
                – SolveIt
                Sep 4 at 13:55










              • Presumably, the online course registration system doesn't support registration of such students. Such students would probably be contacting staff directly and possibly attending informally, e.g., a fourth year physics student might attend courses (without registering) for fourth year maths students (possibly after asking the instructor whether they mind).
                – user2768
                Sep 4 at 15:15






              • 5




                "Presumably, the online course registration system doesn't support registration of such students." You assume the course registration system is infallible.
                – JAB
                Sep 4 at 16:27






              • 1




                @user2768 most systems only go by the prerequisites. My college only used previous courses. For this reason many courses had somewhat irrelevant lower courses as prerequisites as they were required for those majors anyway and it ensured that people weren't taking the courses with absolutely no background in the field.
                – The Great Duck
                Sep 5 at 3:45











              • @JAB I wrote "doesn't support," that's a form of failure. (As I mentioned, the system is limited, e.g., as per the fourth year physics student that I mentioned.)
                – user2768
                Sep 5 at 7:59













              up vote
              8
              down vote










              up vote
              8
              down vote










              Sometimes, the course information is not detailed enough. A lot of course information in the catalog contains no or unreasonable prerequisite.




              Many courses are self-contained and should be accessible to any student that has studied the discipline in preceding years.




              I am not sure whether it would be rude to email the lecturer in advance, asking whether there is any prerequisite not stated in the online system.




              Suggesting that the lecturer was too lazy to list prerequisites is rude. Asking whether there is any reading that they would recommend is not rude, and should be encouraged.



              The main idea is to ask for recommended reading, rather than required reading, because the latter invites conflict by implicitly suggesting that the lecturer didn't list some required reading, whereas the former invites a friendly reply.




              I did send an email asking the prerequisite of the cloud computing course. Initially I expected the lecturer to require me to have some basic knowledge about, e.g. graph theory, database system etc. He replied to me that there is no other prerequisite, though.




              You seem sceptical of your teachers, possibly unnecessarily.



              TL;DR: Course information should be assumed correct; incorrect information isn't beneficial. Asking for additional reading should be encouraged.






              share|improve this answer















              Sometimes, the course information is not detailed enough. A lot of course information in the catalog contains no or unreasonable prerequisite.




              Many courses are self-contained and should be accessible to any student that has studied the discipline in preceding years.




              I am not sure whether it would be rude to email the lecturer in advance, asking whether there is any prerequisite not stated in the online system.




              Suggesting that the lecturer was too lazy to list prerequisites is rude. Asking whether there is any reading that they would recommend is not rude, and should be encouraged.



              The main idea is to ask for recommended reading, rather than required reading, because the latter invites conflict by implicitly suggesting that the lecturer didn't list some required reading, whereas the former invites a friendly reply.




              I did send an email asking the prerequisite of the cloud computing course. Initially I expected the lecturer to require me to have some basic knowledge about, e.g. graph theory, database system etc. He replied to me that there is no other prerequisite, though.




              You seem sceptical of your teachers, possibly unnecessarily.



              TL;DR: Course information should be assumed correct; incorrect information isn't beneficial. Asking for additional reading should be encouraged.







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited Sep 4 at 13:44

























              answered Sep 4 at 7:22









              user2768

              6,55612035




              6,55612035







              • 10




                If OP doesn't necessarily fit the profile of the typical student who would be taking said course, I think it's perfectly reasonable to ask. OP doesn't say what 4000 level means, but if it means 4th year course, and OP isn't a 4th year maths major, there could be implicit prerequisites that OP lacks but every 4th year maths major would have. In this particular case (real analysis), it would be very typical for the course to have no logical prerequisites, while still being practically incomprehensible to someone without the appropriate mathematical maturity.
                – SolveIt
                Sep 4 at 13:55










              • Presumably, the online course registration system doesn't support registration of such students. Such students would probably be contacting staff directly and possibly attending informally, e.g., a fourth year physics student might attend courses (without registering) for fourth year maths students (possibly after asking the instructor whether they mind).
                – user2768
                Sep 4 at 15:15






              • 5




                "Presumably, the online course registration system doesn't support registration of such students." You assume the course registration system is infallible.
                – JAB
                Sep 4 at 16:27






              • 1




                @user2768 most systems only go by the prerequisites. My college only used previous courses. For this reason many courses had somewhat irrelevant lower courses as prerequisites as they were required for those majors anyway and it ensured that people weren't taking the courses with absolutely no background in the field.
                – The Great Duck
                Sep 5 at 3:45











              • @JAB I wrote "doesn't support," that's a form of failure. (As I mentioned, the system is limited, e.g., as per the fourth year physics student that I mentioned.)
                – user2768
                Sep 5 at 7:59













              • 10




                If OP doesn't necessarily fit the profile of the typical student who would be taking said course, I think it's perfectly reasonable to ask. OP doesn't say what 4000 level means, but if it means 4th year course, and OP isn't a 4th year maths major, there could be implicit prerequisites that OP lacks but every 4th year maths major would have. In this particular case (real analysis), it would be very typical for the course to have no logical prerequisites, while still being practically incomprehensible to someone without the appropriate mathematical maturity.
                – SolveIt
                Sep 4 at 13:55










              • Presumably, the online course registration system doesn't support registration of such students. Such students would probably be contacting staff directly and possibly attending informally, e.g., a fourth year physics student might attend courses (without registering) for fourth year maths students (possibly after asking the instructor whether they mind).
                – user2768
                Sep 4 at 15:15






              • 5




                "Presumably, the online course registration system doesn't support registration of such students." You assume the course registration system is infallible.
                – JAB
                Sep 4 at 16:27






              • 1




                @user2768 most systems only go by the prerequisites. My college only used previous courses. For this reason many courses had somewhat irrelevant lower courses as prerequisites as they were required for those majors anyway and it ensured that people weren't taking the courses with absolutely no background in the field.
                – The Great Duck
                Sep 5 at 3:45











              • @JAB I wrote "doesn't support," that's a form of failure. (As I mentioned, the system is limited, e.g., as per the fourth year physics student that I mentioned.)
                – user2768
                Sep 5 at 7:59








              10




              10




              If OP doesn't necessarily fit the profile of the typical student who would be taking said course, I think it's perfectly reasonable to ask. OP doesn't say what 4000 level means, but if it means 4th year course, and OP isn't a 4th year maths major, there could be implicit prerequisites that OP lacks but every 4th year maths major would have. In this particular case (real analysis), it would be very typical for the course to have no logical prerequisites, while still being practically incomprehensible to someone without the appropriate mathematical maturity.
              – SolveIt
              Sep 4 at 13:55




              If OP doesn't necessarily fit the profile of the typical student who would be taking said course, I think it's perfectly reasonable to ask. OP doesn't say what 4000 level means, but if it means 4th year course, and OP isn't a 4th year maths major, there could be implicit prerequisites that OP lacks but every 4th year maths major would have. In this particular case (real analysis), it would be very typical for the course to have no logical prerequisites, while still being practically incomprehensible to someone without the appropriate mathematical maturity.
              – SolveIt
              Sep 4 at 13:55












              Presumably, the online course registration system doesn't support registration of such students. Such students would probably be contacting staff directly and possibly attending informally, e.g., a fourth year physics student might attend courses (without registering) for fourth year maths students (possibly after asking the instructor whether they mind).
              – user2768
              Sep 4 at 15:15




              Presumably, the online course registration system doesn't support registration of such students. Such students would probably be contacting staff directly and possibly attending informally, e.g., a fourth year physics student might attend courses (without registering) for fourth year maths students (possibly after asking the instructor whether they mind).
              – user2768
              Sep 4 at 15:15




              5




              5




              "Presumably, the online course registration system doesn't support registration of such students." You assume the course registration system is infallible.
              – JAB
              Sep 4 at 16:27




              "Presumably, the online course registration system doesn't support registration of such students." You assume the course registration system is infallible.
              – JAB
              Sep 4 at 16:27




              1




              1




              @user2768 most systems only go by the prerequisites. My college only used previous courses. For this reason many courses had somewhat irrelevant lower courses as prerequisites as they were required for those majors anyway and it ensured that people weren't taking the courses with absolutely no background in the field.
              – The Great Duck
              Sep 5 at 3:45





              @user2768 most systems only go by the prerequisites. My college only used previous courses. For this reason many courses had somewhat irrelevant lower courses as prerequisites as they were required for those majors anyway and it ensured that people weren't taking the courses with absolutely no background in the field.
              – The Great Duck
              Sep 5 at 3:45













              @JAB I wrote "doesn't support," that's a form of failure. (As I mentioned, the system is limited, e.g., as per the fourth year physics student that I mentioned.)
              – user2768
              Sep 5 at 7:59





              @JAB I wrote "doesn't support," that's a form of failure. (As I mentioned, the system is limited, e.g., as per the fourth year physics student that I mentioned.)
              – user2768
              Sep 5 at 7:59











              up vote
              1
              down vote













              I've actually had one of my students start asking this of professors when they enroll for courses. Many courses have implicit background classes - and for graduate classes, there is often an assumed background in the field. Memorably, he had a class where the lecturer frequently began statements with "As you will remember from your undergraduate coursework..." - something of a problem if you didn't have said coursework.



              Emailing the professor to discuss your background and chances of successfully doing the coursework has, in my experience, been highly productive.






              share|improve this answer
























                up vote
                1
                down vote













                I've actually had one of my students start asking this of professors when they enroll for courses. Many courses have implicit background classes - and for graduate classes, there is often an assumed background in the field. Memorably, he had a class where the lecturer frequently began statements with "As you will remember from your undergraduate coursework..." - something of a problem if you didn't have said coursework.



                Emailing the professor to discuss your background and chances of successfully doing the coursework has, in my experience, been highly productive.






                share|improve this answer






















                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote









                  I've actually had one of my students start asking this of professors when they enroll for courses. Many courses have implicit background classes - and for graduate classes, there is often an assumed background in the field. Memorably, he had a class where the lecturer frequently began statements with "As you will remember from your undergraduate coursework..." - something of a problem if you didn't have said coursework.



                  Emailing the professor to discuss your background and chances of successfully doing the coursework has, in my experience, been highly productive.






                  share|improve this answer












                  I've actually had one of my students start asking this of professors when they enroll for courses. Many courses have implicit background classes - and for graduate classes, there is often an assumed background in the field. Memorably, he had a class where the lecturer frequently began statements with "As you will remember from your undergraduate coursework..." - something of a problem if you didn't have said coursework.



                  Emailing the professor to discuss your background and chances of successfully doing the coursework has, in my experience, been highly productive.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Sep 7 at 17:25









                  Fomite

                  46.6k498212




                  46.6k498212



























                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded















































                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f116339%2fis-it-rude-to-ask-the-lecturer-whether-there-is-any-effective-prerequisite%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest













































































                      這個網誌中的熱門文章

                      Is there any way to eliminate the singular point to solve this integral by hand or by approximations?

                      Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

                      Carbon dioxide