Is this extension continuous on $X$?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Let $X$ be a locally convex space. Let $M$ be a dense subspace of $X$ and let $fin M^*$. And I am trying to show there exists $gin X^*$ such that $g|_M=f$.



My attempts are:



Let $xin X$. Then there exists a net $(x_i)$ in $M$ such that $x_irightarrow x$. Thus $(x_i)$ is a Cauchy net in $M$, and hence $(f(x_i))$ is a Cauchy net in $mathbbF$. Since $mathbbF$ is a Banach space, $limlimits_i f(x_i)$ exists in $mathbbF$. Now define $g(x)=limlimits_i f(x_i)$. Then $g:XrightarrowmathbbF$ is linear and $g|_M=f$. Let $(x_k)$ be a net in $X$ such that $x_krightarrow x$.



And I am trying to show $g(x_k)rightarrow g(x)$ to get continuity of $g$. But I am stuck here. Does $g(x_k)rightarrow g(x)$? If so how to prove it?



Thank you in advance!










share|cite|improve this question





















  • Why is $g$ well-defined and linear? I cannot see that.
    – amsmath
    Sep 11 at 4:30














up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Let $X$ be a locally convex space. Let $M$ be a dense subspace of $X$ and let $fin M^*$. And I am trying to show there exists $gin X^*$ such that $g|_M=f$.



My attempts are:



Let $xin X$. Then there exists a net $(x_i)$ in $M$ such that $x_irightarrow x$. Thus $(x_i)$ is a Cauchy net in $M$, and hence $(f(x_i))$ is a Cauchy net in $mathbbF$. Since $mathbbF$ is a Banach space, $limlimits_i f(x_i)$ exists in $mathbbF$. Now define $g(x)=limlimits_i f(x_i)$. Then $g:XrightarrowmathbbF$ is linear and $g|_M=f$. Let $(x_k)$ be a net in $X$ such that $x_krightarrow x$.



And I am trying to show $g(x_k)rightarrow g(x)$ to get continuity of $g$. But I am stuck here. Does $g(x_k)rightarrow g(x)$? If so how to prove it?



Thank you in advance!










share|cite|improve this question





















  • Why is $g$ well-defined and linear? I cannot see that.
    – amsmath
    Sep 11 at 4:30












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











Let $X$ be a locally convex space. Let $M$ be a dense subspace of $X$ and let $fin M^*$. And I am trying to show there exists $gin X^*$ such that $g|_M=f$.



My attempts are:



Let $xin X$. Then there exists a net $(x_i)$ in $M$ such that $x_irightarrow x$. Thus $(x_i)$ is a Cauchy net in $M$, and hence $(f(x_i))$ is a Cauchy net in $mathbbF$. Since $mathbbF$ is a Banach space, $limlimits_i f(x_i)$ exists in $mathbbF$. Now define $g(x)=limlimits_i f(x_i)$. Then $g:XrightarrowmathbbF$ is linear and $g|_M=f$. Let $(x_k)$ be a net in $X$ such that $x_krightarrow x$.



And I am trying to show $g(x_k)rightarrow g(x)$ to get continuity of $g$. But I am stuck here. Does $g(x_k)rightarrow g(x)$? If so how to prove it?



Thank you in advance!










share|cite|improve this question













Let $X$ be a locally convex space. Let $M$ be a dense subspace of $X$ and let $fin M^*$. And I am trying to show there exists $gin X^*$ such that $g|_M=f$.



My attempts are:



Let $xin X$. Then there exists a net $(x_i)$ in $M$ such that $x_irightarrow x$. Thus $(x_i)$ is a Cauchy net in $M$, and hence $(f(x_i))$ is a Cauchy net in $mathbbF$. Since $mathbbF$ is a Banach space, $limlimits_i f(x_i)$ exists in $mathbbF$. Now define $g(x)=limlimits_i f(x_i)$. Then $g:XrightarrowmathbbF$ is linear and $g|_M=f$. Let $(x_k)$ be a net in $X$ such that $x_krightarrow x$.



And I am trying to show $g(x_k)rightarrow g(x)$ to get continuity of $g$. But I am stuck here. Does $g(x_k)rightarrow g(x)$? If so how to prove it?



Thank you in advance!







functional-analysis locally-convex-spaces






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Sep 11 at 4:13









Answer Lee

54138




54138











  • Why is $g$ well-defined and linear? I cannot see that.
    – amsmath
    Sep 11 at 4:30
















  • Why is $g$ well-defined and linear? I cannot see that.
    – amsmath
    Sep 11 at 4:30















Why is $g$ well-defined and linear? I cannot see that.
– amsmath
Sep 11 at 4:30




Why is $g$ well-defined and linear? I cannot see that.
– amsmath
Sep 11 at 4:30















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2912736%2fis-this-extension-continuous-on-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest



































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2912736%2fis-this-extension-continuous-on-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

Is there any way to eliminate the singular point to solve this integral by hand or by approximations?

Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

Solve: $(3xy-2ay^2)dx+(x^2-2axy)dy=0$