If $E e^theta ^2 X^2 leq e^ctheta^2$ for every $theta$, then $X$ is almost surely bounded

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












The original problem states as below:



Suppose some random variable $X$ satisfies $DeclareMathOperator*EmathbbE E e^theta ^2 X^2 leq e^ctheta^2$ for some constant $c$ and $forall theta in R$ show that $X$ is a bounded random variable ? i.e $|X|_infty <infty$



how to solve this one ?



Here is some of my attempt:



We want to bound $DeclareMathOperator*EmathbbE (E|X|^p)^1/p$



$$
beginalign*
DeclareMathOperator*EmathbbE E|X|^p &= int_0^infty P(|X|^p>t)mathrmdt\
&= int_0^infty P(|X|>t^1/p)mathrmdt\
&= int_0^infty P(e^X^2>e^t^2/p)mathrmdt\
&leq int_0^infty e^-t^2/p E e^X^2mathrmdt\
&leq e^cint_0^infty e^-t^2/p mathrmdt quad(E e^theta ^2 X^2 leq e^ctheta^2,take theta=1)\
&=e^cGamma(frac2/p+12/p)\
&leq e^c (frac2+p2)^frac2+p2
endalign*
$$



then we have:
$$
beginalign*
DeclareMathOperator*EmathbbE
(E|X|^p)^1/p leq e^c/p(frac2+p2)^frac2+p2p
endalign* $$
which do not converges as $ p to infty $
,to here I think I fail to bound it



@Clement C. just check your hint , I think it is workable if I compute it right



$$
beginalign*
DeclareMathOperator*EmathbbE
undersetthetainf frace^ctheta^2theta^pGamma(1+p/2)&= 2(ce)^p/2 fracGamma(1+fracp2)(p/2)^(p/2)
\ &= 2(ce)^p/2fracp2fracGamma(fracp2)(p/2)^(p/2)
\ &leq (ce)^p/2P
endalign* $$



and thus we have:



$$
beginalign*
DeclareMathOperator*EmathbbE
(E|X|^p)^1/p leq (ce)^1/2 p^1/p leq (ce)^1/2 e^1/e
endalign* $$



which is bound by constant










share|cite|improve this question























  • Please read my answer also. If I didn't make t a mistake this is really trivial.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Sep 11 at 5:35










  • ShaoyuPei: And there is an even more trivial approach... Really, you accept answers much too quickly.
    – Did
    Sep 11 at 10:31










  • Additionnally, I would be curious to know if you actually managed to complete the proof @ClementC. suggested...
    – Did
    Sep 11 at 10:33











  • @Did Me too, to be honest. My solution (assuming is does go through without further assumptions on $c$) is not the most elegant nor shortest, merely one that mimicks the OP's attempt to fix it.
    – Clement C.
    Sep 11 at 20:17






  • 1




    @ShaoyuPei Before accepting my answer, have you managed to make my suggestion go through?
    – Clement C.
    Sep 11 at 20:25














up vote
2
down vote

favorite












The original problem states as below:



Suppose some random variable $X$ satisfies $DeclareMathOperator*EmathbbE E e^theta ^2 X^2 leq e^ctheta^2$ for some constant $c$ and $forall theta in R$ show that $X$ is a bounded random variable ? i.e $|X|_infty <infty$



how to solve this one ?



Here is some of my attempt:



We want to bound $DeclareMathOperator*EmathbbE (E|X|^p)^1/p$



$$
beginalign*
DeclareMathOperator*EmathbbE E|X|^p &= int_0^infty P(|X|^p>t)mathrmdt\
&= int_0^infty P(|X|>t^1/p)mathrmdt\
&= int_0^infty P(e^X^2>e^t^2/p)mathrmdt\
&leq int_0^infty e^-t^2/p E e^X^2mathrmdt\
&leq e^cint_0^infty e^-t^2/p mathrmdt quad(E e^theta ^2 X^2 leq e^ctheta^2,take theta=1)\
&=e^cGamma(frac2/p+12/p)\
&leq e^c (frac2+p2)^frac2+p2
endalign*
$$



then we have:
$$
beginalign*
DeclareMathOperator*EmathbbE
(E|X|^p)^1/p leq e^c/p(frac2+p2)^frac2+p2p
endalign* $$
which do not converges as $ p to infty $
,to here I think I fail to bound it



@Clement C. just check your hint , I think it is workable if I compute it right



$$
beginalign*
DeclareMathOperator*EmathbbE
undersetthetainf frace^ctheta^2theta^pGamma(1+p/2)&= 2(ce)^p/2 fracGamma(1+fracp2)(p/2)^(p/2)
\ &= 2(ce)^p/2fracp2fracGamma(fracp2)(p/2)^(p/2)
\ &leq (ce)^p/2P
endalign* $$



and thus we have:



$$
beginalign*
DeclareMathOperator*EmathbbE
(E|X|^p)^1/p leq (ce)^1/2 p^1/p leq (ce)^1/2 e^1/e
endalign* $$



which is bound by constant










share|cite|improve this question























  • Please read my answer also. If I didn't make t a mistake this is really trivial.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Sep 11 at 5:35










  • ShaoyuPei: And there is an even more trivial approach... Really, you accept answers much too quickly.
    – Did
    Sep 11 at 10:31










  • Additionnally, I would be curious to know if you actually managed to complete the proof @ClementC. suggested...
    – Did
    Sep 11 at 10:33











  • @Did Me too, to be honest. My solution (assuming is does go through without further assumptions on $c$) is not the most elegant nor shortest, merely one that mimicks the OP's attempt to fix it.
    – Clement C.
    Sep 11 at 20:17






  • 1




    @ShaoyuPei Before accepting my answer, have you managed to make my suggestion go through?
    – Clement C.
    Sep 11 at 20:25












up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











The original problem states as below:



Suppose some random variable $X$ satisfies $DeclareMathOperator*EmathbbE E e^theta ^2 X^2 leq e^ctheta^2$ for some constant $c$ and $forall theta in R$ show that $X$ is a bounded random variable ? i.e $|X|_infty <infty$



how to solve this one ?



Here is some of my attempt:



We want to bound $DeclareMathOperator*EmathbbE (E|X|^p)^1/p$



$$
beginalign*
DeclareMathOperator*EmathbbE E|X|^p &= int_0^infty P(|X|^p>t)mathrmdt\
&= int_0^infty P(|X|>t^1/p)mathrmdt\
&= int_0^infty P(e^X^2>e^t^2/p)mathrmdt\
&leq int_0^infty e^-t^2/p E e^X^2mathrmdt\
&leq e^cint_0^infty e^-t^2/p mathrmdt quad(E e^theta ^2 X^2 leq e^ctheta^2,take theta=1)\
&=e^cGamma(frac2/p+12/p)\
&leq e^c (frac2+p2)^frac2+p2
endalign*
$$



then we have:
$$
beginalign*
DeclareMathOperator*EmathbbE
(E|X|^p)^1/p leq e^c/p(frac2+p2)^frac2+p2p
endalign* $$
which do not converges as $ p to infty $
,to here I think I fail to bound it



@Clement C. just check your hint , I think it is workable if I compute it right



$$
beginalign*
DeclareMathOperator*EmathbbE
undersetthetainf frace^ctheta^2theta^pGamma(1+p/2)&= 2(ce)^p/2 fracGamma(1+fracp2)(p/2)^(p/2)
\ &= 2(ce)^p/2fracp2fracGamma(fracp2)(p/2)^(p/2)
\ &leq (ce)^p/2P
endalign* $$



and thus we have:



$$
beginalign*
DeclareMathOperator*EmathbbE
(E|X|^p)^1/p leq (ce)^1/2 p^1/p leq (ce)^1/2 e^1/e
endalign* $$



which is bound by constant










share|cite|improve this question















The original problem states as below:



Suppose some random variable $X$ satisfies $DeclareMathOperator*EmathbbE E e^theta ^2 X^2 leq e^ctheta^2$ for some constant $c$ and $forall theta in R$ show that $X$ is a bounded random variable ? i.e $|X|_infty <infty$



how to solve this one ?



Here is some of my attempt:



We want to bound $DeclareMathOperator*EmathbbE (E|X|^p)^1/p$



$$
beginalign*
DeclareMathOperator*EmathbbE E|X|^p &= int_0^infty P(|X|^p>t)mathrmdt\
&= int_0^infty P(|X|>t^1/p)mathrmdt\
&= int_0^infty P(e^X^2>e^t^2/p)mathrmdt\
&leq int_0^infty e^-t^2/p E e^X^2mathrmdt\
&leq e^cint_0^infty e^-t^2/p mathrmdt quad(E e^theta ^2 X^2 leq e^ctheta^2,take theta=1)\
&=e^cGamma(frac2/p+12/p)\
&leq e^c (frac2+p2)^frac2+p2
endalign*
$$



then we have:
$$
beginalign*
DeclareMathOperator*EmathbbE
(E|X|^p)^1/p leq e^c/p(frac2+p2)^frac2+p2p
endalign* $$
which do not converges as $ p to infty $
,to here I think I fail to bound it



@Clement C. just check your hint , I think it is workable if I compute it right



$$
beginalign*
DeclareMathOperator*EmathbbE
undersetthetainf frace^ctheta^2theta^pGamma(1+p/2)&= 2(ce)^p/2 fracGamma(1+fracp2)(p/2)^(p/2)
\ &= 2(ce)^p/2fracp2fracGamma(fracp2)(p/2)^(p/2)
\ &leq (ce)^p/2P
endalign* $$



and thus we have:



$$
beginalign*
DeclareMathOperator*EmathbbE
(E|X|^p)^1/p leq (ce)^1/2 p^1/p leq (ce)^1/2 e^1/e
endalign* $$



which is bound by constant







probability measure-theory inequality random-variables concentration-of-measure






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Sep 15 at 3:05

























asked Sep 11 at 4:29









ShaoyuPei

1187




1187











  • Please read my answer also. If I didn't make t a mistake this is really trivial.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Sep 11 at 5:35










  • ShaoyuPei: And there is an even more trivial approach... Really, you accept answers much too quickly.
    – Did
    Sep 11 at 10:31










  • Additionnally, I would be curious to know if you actually managed to complete the proof @ClementC. suggested...
    – Did
    Sep 11 at 10:33











  • @Did Me too, to be honest. My solution (assuming is does go through without further assumptions on $c$) is not the most elegant nor shortest, merely one that mimicks the OP's attempt to fix it.
    – Clement C.
    Sep 11 at 20:17






  • 1




    @ShaoyuPei Before accepting my answer, have you managed to make my suggestion go through?
    – Clement C.
    Sep 11 at 20:25
















  • Please read my answer also. If I didn't make t a mistake this is really trivial.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Sep 11 at 5:35










  • ShaoyuPei: And there is an even more trivial approach... Really, you accept answers much too quickly.
    – Did
    Sep 11 at 10:31










  • Additionnally, I would be curious to know if you actually managed to complete the proof @ClementC. suggested...
    – Did
    Sep 11 at 10:33











  • @Did Me too, to be honest. My solution (assuming is does go through without further assumptions on $c$) is not the most elegant nor shortest, merely one that mimicks the OP's attempt to fix it.
    – Clement C.
    Sep 11 at 20:17






  • 1




    @ShaoyuPei Before accepting my answer, have you managed to make my suggestion go through?
    – Clement C.
    Sep 11 at 20:25















Please read my answer also. If I didn't make t a mistake this is really trivial.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Sep 11 at 5:35




Please read my answer also. If I didn't make t a mistake this is really trivial.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Sep 11 at 5:35












ShaoyuPei: And there is an even more trivial approach... Really, you accept answers much too quickly.
– Did
Sep 11 at 10:31




ShaoyuPei: And there is an even more trivial approach... Really, you accept answers much too quickly.
– Did
Sep 11 at 10:31












Additionnally, I would be curious to know if you actually managed to complete the proof @ClementC. suggested...
– Did
Sep 11 at 10:33





Additionnally, I would be curious to know if you actually managed to complete the proof @ClementC. suggested...
– Did
Sep 11 at 10:33













@Did Me too, to be honest. My solution (assuming is does go through without further assumptions on $c$) is not the most elegant nor shortest, merely one that mimicks the OP's attempt to fix it.
– Clement C.
Sep 11 at 20:17




@Did Me too, to be honest. My solution (assuming is does go through without further assumptions on $c$) is not the most elegant nor shortest, merely one that mimicks the OP's attempt to fix it.
– Clement C.
Sep 11 at 20:17




1




1




@ShaoyuPei Before accepting my answer, have you managed to make my suggestion go through?
– Clement C.
Sep 11 at 20:25




@ShaoyuPei Before accepting my answer, have you managed to make my suggestion go through?
– Clement C.
Sep 11 at 20:25










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










Hint: You are not using the fact that the bound holds for every $theta$. This is important.



To use it: Introduce "artificially" a $theta$: for every $theta>0$,
beginalign
mathbbE|X|^p &= int_0^infty mathbbPXmathrmdt\
&= int_0^infty mathbbPmathrmdt\
&=int_0^infty mathbbPe^theta^2 X^2 > e^theta^2t^2/p dt\
&leq int_0^infty e^-theta^2t^2/p mathbbE[e^theta^2 X^2] dt tagMarkov\
&leq e^ctheta^2int_0^infty e^-theta^2t^2/pdt tagassumption
endalign
Now compute the integral as you did to get a final bound
$$
frace^ctheta^2theta^pGamma(1+p/2) tag$dagger$
$$ which depends on $theta$; then try to choose the best $theta$ as a function of $p$ to optimize this bound.



Important: The above does not appear to go through. Namely, the minimum of $(dagger)$ is achieved for $theta^2 = p/(2c)$, and the final bound is asymptotically $sqrtppi c^p/2$. Thus $(mathbbE|X|^p)^1/p$ will only be bounded if $0leq c<1$ (in which case the limit as $ptoinfty$ is $0$).






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • Please see if my answer is correct.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Sep 11 at 5:36










  • @KaviRamaMurthy Please see if mine is :)
    – Clement C.
    Sep 11 at 20:28










  • @I think your solution is workable
    – ShaoyuPei
    Sep 15 at 2:12

















up vote
3
down vote













Low-tech approach: For every $theta$ and every $a>c$, $$E(e^theta^2X^2)geqslant E(e^theta^2X^2;X^2geqslant a)geqslant e^theta^2aP(X^2geqslant a)$$ hence $$P(X^2geqslant a)leqslant e^-theta^2ae^theta^2c$$ The RHS goes to $0$ when $theta^2toinfty$ hence $$P(X^2geqslant a)=0$$ This holds for every $a>c$ hence $X^2leqslant c$ almost surely, QED.






share|cite|improve this answer



























    up vote
    2
    down vote













    We have $Ee^theta^2(X^2-c) leq 1$. By Fatou's Lemma $E lim inf_theta to infty e^theta^2(X^2-c) leq 1$. On the set $X^2 >c$ the $lim inf $ is $infty$. This implies that $X^2 leq c$ almost everywhere.






    share|cite|improve this answer




















      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2912742%2fif-e-e-theta-2-x2-leq-ec-theta2-for-every-theta-then-x-is%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest






























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      1
      down vote



      accepted










      Hint: You are not using the fact that the bound holds for every $theta$. This is important.



      To use it: Introduce "artificially" a $theta$: for every $theta>0$,
      beginalign
      mathbbE|X|^p &= int_0^infty mathbbPXmathrmdt\
      &= int_0^infty mathbbPmathrmdt\
      &=int_0^infty mathbbPe^theta^2 X^2 > e^theta^2t^2/p dt\
      &leq int_0^infty e^-theta^2t^2/p mathbbE[e^theta^2 X^2] dt tagMarkov\
      &leq e^ctheta^2int_0^infty e^-theta^2t^2/pdt tagassumption
      endalign
      Now compute the integral as you did to get a final bound
      $$
      frace^ctheta^2theta^pGamma(1+p/2) tag$dagger$
      $$ which depends on $theta$; then try to choose the best $theta$ as a function of $p$ to optimize this bound.



      Important: The above does not appear to go through. Namely, the minimum of $(dagger)$ is achieved for $theta^2 = p/(2c)$, and the final bound is asymptotically $sqrtppi c^p/2$. Thus $(mathbbE|X|^p)^1/p$ will only be bounded if $0leq c<1$ (in which case the limit as $ptoinfty$ is $0$).






      share|cite|improve this answer






















      • Please see if my answer is correct.
        – Kavi Rama Murthy
        Sep 11 at 5:36










      • @KaviRamaMurthy Please see if mine is :)
        – Clement C.
        Sep 11 at 20:28










      • @I think your solution is workable
        – ShaoyuPei
        Sep 15 at 2:12














      up vote
      1
      down vote



      accepted










      Hint: You are not using the fact that the bound holds for every $theta$. This is important.



      To use it: Introduce "artificially" a $theta$: for every $theta>0$,
      beginalign
      mathbbE|X|^p &= int_0^infty mathbbPXmathrmdt\
      &= int_0^infty mathbbPmathrmdt\
      &=int_0^infty mathbbPe^theta^2 X^2 > e^theta^2t^2/p dt\
      &leq int_0^infty e^-theta^2t^2/p mathbbE[e^theta^2 X^2] dt tagMarkov\
      &leq e^ctheta^2int_0^infty e^-theta^2t^2/pdt tagassumption
      endalign
      Now compute the integral as you did to get a final bound
      $$
      frace^ctheta^2theta^pGamma(1+p/2) tag$dagger$
      $$ which depends on $theta$; then try to choose the best $theta$ as a function of $p$ to optimize this bound.



      Important: The above does not appear to go through. Namely, the minimum of $(dagger)$ is achieved for $theta^2 = p/(2c)$, and the final bound is asymptotically $sqrtppi c^p/2$. Thus $(mathbbE|X|^p)^1/p$ will only be bounded if $0leq c<1$ (in which case the limit as $ptoinfty$ is $0$).






      share|cite|improve this answer






















      • Please see if my answer is correct.
        – Kavi Rama Murthy
        Sep 11 at 5:36










      • @KaviRamaMurthy Please see if mine is :)
        – Clement C.
        Sep 11 at 20:28










      • @I think your solution is workable
        – ShaoyuPei
        Sep 15 at 2:12












      up vote
      1
      down vote



      accepted







      up vote
      1
      down vote



      accepted






      Hint: You are not using the fact that the bound holds for every $theta$. This is important.



      To use it: Introduce "artificially" a $theta$: for every $theta>0$,
      beginalign
      mathbbE|X|^p &= int_0^infty mathbbPXmathrmdt\
      &= int_0^infty mathbbPmathrmdt\
      &=int_0^infty mathbbPe^theta^2 X^2 > e^theta^2t^2/p dt\
      &leq int_0^infty e^-theta^2t^2/p mathbbE[e^theta^2 X^2] dt tagMarkov\
      &leq e^ctheta^2int_0^infty e^-theta^2t^2/pdt tagassumption
      endalign
      Now compute the integral as you did to get a final bound
      $$
      frace^ctheta^2theta^pGamma(1+p/2) tag$dagger$
      $$ which depends on $theta$; then try to choose the best $theta$ as a function of $p$ to optimize this bound.



      Important: The above does not appear to go through. Namely, the minimum of $(dagger)$ is achieved for $theta^2 = p/(2c)$, and the final bound is asymptotically $sqrtppi c^p/2$. Thus $(mathbbE|X|^p)^1/p$ will only be bounded if $0leq c<1$ (in which case the limit as $ptoinfty$ is $0$).






      share|cite|improve this answer














      Hint: You are not using the fact that the bound holds for every $theta$. This is important.



      To use it: Introduce "artificially" a $theta$: for every $theta>0$,
      beginalign
      mathbbE|X|^p &= int_0^infty mathbbPXmathrmdt\
      &= int_0^infty mathbbPmathrmdt\
      &=int_0^infty mathbbPe^theta^2 X^2 > e^theta^2t^2/p dt\
      &leq int_0^infty e^-theta^2t^2/p mathbbE[e^theta^2 X^2] dt tagMarkov\
      &leq e^ctheta^2int_0^infty e^-theta^2t^2/pdt tagassumption
      endalign
      Now compute the integral as you did to get a final bound
      $$
      frace^ctheta^2theta^pGamma(1+p/2) tag$dagger$
      $$ which depends on $theta$; then try to choose the best $theta$ as a function of $p$ to optimize this bound.



      Important: The above does not appear to go through. Namely, the minimum of $(dagger)$ is achieved for $theta^2 = p/(2c)$, and the final bound is asymptotically $sqrtppi c^p/2$. Thus $(mathbbE|X|^p)^1/p$ will only be bounded if $0leq c<1$ (in which case the limit as $ptoinfty$ is $0$).







      share|cite|improve this answer














      share|cite|improve this answer



      share|cite|improve this answer








      edited Sep 11 at 20:33

























      answered Sep 11 at 5:15









      Clement C.

      48.3k33783




      48.3k33783











      • Please see if my answer is correct.
        – Kavi Rama Murthy
        Sep 11 at 5:36










      • @KaviRamaMurthy Please see if mine is :)
        – Clement C.
        Sep 11 at 20:28










      • @I think your solution is workable
        – ShaoyuPei
        Sep 15 at 2:12
















      • Please see if my answer is correct.
        – Kavi Rama Murthy
        Sep 11 at 5:36










      • @KaviRamaMurthy Please see if mine is :)
        – Clement C.
        Sep 11 at 20:28










      • @I think your solution is workable
        – ShaoyuPei
        Sep 15 at 2:12















      Please see if my answer is correct.
      – Kavi Rama Murthy
      Sep 11 at 5:36




      Please see if my answer is correct.
      – Kavi Rama Murthy
      Sep 11 at 5:36












      @KaviRamaMurthy Please see if mine is :)
      – Clement C.
      Sep 11 at 20:28




      @KaviRamaMurthy Please see if mine is :)
      – Clement C.
      Sep 11 at 20:28












      @I think your solution is workable
      – ShaoyuPei
      Sep 15 at 2:12




      @I think your solution is workable
      – ShaoyuPei
      Sep 15 at 2:12










      up vote
      3
      down vote













      Low-tech approach: For every $theta$ and every $a>c$, $$E(e^theta^2X^2)geqslant E(e^theta^2X^2;X^2geqslant a)geqslant e^theta^2aP(X^2geqslant a)$$ hence $$P(X^2geqslant a)leqslant e^-theta^2ae^theta^2c$$ The RHS goes to $0$ when $theta^2toinfty$ hence $$P(X^2geqslant a)=0$$ This holds for every $a>c$ hence $X^2leqslant c$ almost surely, QED.






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        up vote
        3
        down vote













        Low-tech approach: For every $theta$ and every $a>c$, $$E(e^theta^2X^2)geqslant E(e^theta^2X^2;X^2geqslant a)geqslant e^theta^2aP(X^2geqslant a)$$ hence $$P(X^2geqslant a)leqslant e^-theta^2ae^theta^2c$$ The RHS goes to $0$ when $theta^2toinfty$ hence $$P(X^2geqslant a)=0$$ This holds for every $a>c$ hence $X^2leqslant c$ almost surely, QED.






        share|cite|improve this answer






















          up vote
          3
          down vote










          up vote
          3
          down vote









          Low-tech approach: For every $theta$ and every $a>c$, $$E(e^theta^2X^2)geqslant E(e^theta^2X^2;X^2geqslant a)geqslant e^theta^2aP(X^2geqslant a)$$ hence $$P(X^2geqslant a)leqslant e^-theta^2ae^theta^2c$$ The RHS goes to $0$ when $theta^2toinfty$ hence $$P(X^2geqslant a)=0$$ This holds for every $a>c$ hence $X^2leqslant c$ almost surely, QED.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Low-tech approach: For every $theta$ and every $a>c$, $$E(e^theta^2X^2)geqslant E(e^theta^2X^2;X^2geqslant a)geqslant e^theta^2aP(X^2geqslant a)$$ hence $$P(X^2geqslant a)leqslant e^-theta^2ae^theta^2c$$ The RHS goes to $0$ when $theta^2toinfty$ hence $$P(X^2geqslant a)=0$$ This holds for every $a>c$ hence $X^2leqslant c$ almost surely, QED.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Sep 11 at 10:30









          Did

          244k23211451




          244k23211451




















              up vote
              2
              down vote













              We have $Ee^theta^2(X^2-c) leq 1$. By Fatou's Lemma $E lim inf_theta to infty e^theta^2(X^2-c) leq 1$. On the set $X^2 >c$ the $lim inf $ is $infty$. This implies that $X^2 leq c$ almost everywhere.






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                up vote
                2
                down vote













                We have $Ee^theta^2(X^2-c) leq 1$. By Fatou's Lemma $E lim inf_theta to infty e^theta^2(X^2-c) leq 1$. On the set $X^2 >c$ the $lim inf $ is $infty$. This implies that $X^2 leq c$ almost everywhere.






                share|cite|improve this answer






















                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote









                  We have $Ee^theta^2(X^2-c) leq 1$. By Fatou's Lemma $E lim inf_theta to infty e^theta^2(X^2-c) leq 1$. On the set $X^2 >c$ the $lim inf $ is $infty$. This implies that $X^2 leq c$ almost everywhere.






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  We have $Ee^theta^2(X^2-c) leq 1$. By Fatou's Lemma $E lim inf_theta to infty e^theta^2(X^2-c) leq 1$. On the set $X^2 >c$ the $lim inf $ is $infty$. This implies that $X^2 leq c$ almost everywhere.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Sep 11 at 5:33









                  Kavi Rama Murthy

                  37.4k31747




                  37.4k31747



























                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded















































                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2912742%2fif-e-e-theta-2-x2-leq-ec-theta2-for-every-theta-then-x-is%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest













































































                      這個網誌中的熱門文章

                      Is there any way to eliminate the singular point to solve this integral by hand or by approximations?

                      Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

                      Solve: $(3xy-2ay^2)dx+(x^2-2axy)dy=0$