Two random variables are independent if all continuous and bounded transformations are uncorrelated.

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Here's a statement I've come across multiple times but have never seen a proof of:




Two random variables $X$ and $Y$ are independent, if for all continuous and bounded funtions $f, g: mathbb Rtomathbb R$ it holds that
$$E[f(X)g(Y)]=E[f(X)]E[g(Y)].tag1$$




I found this answer but I'm not sure that I'm filling in the details correctly:



Suppose $X$ and $Y$ satisfy the condition in $(1).$ We want to show that $X$ and $Y$ are independent. Since the closed intervals generate the Borel sigma algebra, it suffices to show that
$$P(Xin I_1, Yin I_2)=P(Xin I_1)P(Yin I_2)$$
for all closed intervals $I_1, I_2subsetmathbb R.$ Given two such intervals let $f_n, g_nge0$ be sequences of continuous and bounded functions with
$$f_n(cdot)uparrow 1(cdotin I_1), quad g_n(cdot)uparrow 1(cdotin I_2). tag2$$



Then
beginalign*
P(Xin I_1, Yin I_2) &= E[1(Xin I_1, Yin I_2)]\
&= E[1(Xin I_1)1(Yin I_2)]\
&= E[lim_ntoinftyf_n(X)lim_mtoinftyg_m(Y)]\
&= lim_ntoinftyE[f_n(X)lim_mtoinftyg_m(Y)]quad text(by monotone convergence)\
&= lim_ntoinftylim_mtoinftyE[f_n(X)g_m(Y)]quad text(by m.c.)\
&= lim_ntoinftylim_mtoinftyE[f_n(X)]E[g_m(Y)]quad text(by assumption)\
&= E[1(Xin I_1)]E[1(Yin I_2)]quad text(by m.c.)\
&=P(Xin I_1)P(Yin I_2),\
endalign*
hence the claim.



Question: Is my above proof correct?







share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    Here's a statement I've come across multiple times but have never seen a proof of:




    Two random variables $X$ and $Y$ are independent, if for all continuous and bounded funtions $f, g: mathbb Rtomathbb R$ it holds that
    $$E[f(X)g(Y)]=E[f(X)]E[g(Y)].tag1$$




    I found this answer but I'm not sure that I'm filling in the details correctly:



    Suppose $X$ and $Y$ satisfy the condition in $(1).$ We want to show that $X$ and $Y$ are independent. Since the closed intervals generate the Borel sigma algebra, it suffices to show that
    $$P(Xin I_1, Yin I_2)=P(Xin I_1)P(Yin I_2)$$
    for all closed intervals $I_1, I_2subsetmathbb R.$ Given two such intervals let $f_n, g_nge0$ be sequences of continuous and bounded functions with
    $$f_n(cdot)uparrow 1(cdotin I_1), quad g_n(cdot)uparrow 1(cdotin I_2). tag2$$



    Then
    beginalign*
    P(Xin I_1, Yin I_2) &= E[1(Xin I_1, Yin I_2)]\
    &= E[1(Xin I_1)1(Yin I_2)]\
    &= E[lim_ntoinftyf_n(X)lim_mtoinftyg_m(Y)]\
    &= lim_ntoinftyE[f_n(X)lim_mtoinftyg_m(Y)]quad text(by monotone convergence)\
    &= lim_ntoinftylim_mtoinftyE[f_n(X)g_m(Y)]quad text(by m.c.)\
    &= lim_ntoinftylim_mtoinftyE[f_n(X)]E[g_m(Y)]quad text(by assumption)\
    &= E[1(Xin I_1)]E[1(Yin I_2)]quad text(by m.c.)\
    &=P(Xin I_1)P(Yin I_2),\
    endalign*
    hence the claim.



    Question: Is my above proof correct?







    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      Here's a statement I've come across multiple times but have never seen a proof of:




      Two random variables $X$ and $Y$ are independent, if for all continuous and bounded funtions $f, g: mathbb Rtomathbb R$ it holds that
      $$E[f(X)g(Y)]=E[f(X)]E[g(Y)].tag1$$




      I found this answer but I'm not sure that I'm filling in the details correctly:



      Suppose $X$ and $Y$ satisfy the condition in $(1).$ We want to show that $X$ and $Y$ are independent. Since the closed intervals generate the Borel sigma algebra, it suffices to show that
      $$P(Xin I_1, Yin I_2)=P(Xin I_1)P(Yin I_2)$$
      for all closed intervals $I_1, I_2subsetmathbb R.$ Given two such intervals let $f_n, g_nge0$ be sequences of continuous and bounded functions with
      $$f_n(cdot)uparrow 1(cdotin I_1), quad g_n(cdot)uparrow 1(cdotin I_2). tag2$$



      Then
      beginalign*
      P(Xin I_1, Yin I_2) &= E[1(Xin I_1, Yin I_2)]\
      &= E[1(Xin I_1)1(Yin I_2)]\
      &= E[lim_ntoinftyf_n(X)lim_mtoinftyg_m(Y)]\
      &= lim_ntoinftyE[f_n(X)lim_mtoinftyg_m(Y)]quad text(by monotone convergence)\
      &= lim_ntoinftylim_mtoinftyE[f_n(X)g_m(Y)]quad text(by m.c.)\
      &= lim_ntoinftylim_mtoinftyE[f_n(X)]E[g_m(Y)]quad text(by assumption)\
      &= E[1(Xin I_1)]E[1(Yin I_2)]quad text(by m.c.)\
      &=P(Xin I_1)P(Yin I_2),\
      endalign*
      hence the claim.



      Question: Is my above proof correct?







      share|cite|improve this question














      Here's a statement I've come across multiple times but have never seen a proof of:




      Two random variables $X$ and $Y$ are independent, if for all continuous and bounded funtions $f, g: mathbb Rtomathbb R$ it holds that
      $$E[f(X)g(Y)]=E[f(X)]E[g(Y)].tag1$$




      I found this answer but I'm not sure that I'm filling in the details correctly:



      Suppose $X$ and $Y$ satisfy the condition in $(1).$ We want to show that $X$ and $Y$ are independent. Since the closed intervals generate the Borel sigma algebra, it suffices to show that
      $$P(Xin I_1, Yin I_2)=P(Xin I_1)P(Yin I_2)$$
      for all closed intervals $I_1, I_2subsetmathbb R.$ Given two such intervals let $f_n, g_nge0$ be sequences of continuous and bounded functions with
      $$f_n(cdot)uparrow 1(cdotin I_1), quad g_n(cdot)uparrow 1(cdotin I_2). tag2$$



      Then
      beginalign*
      P(Xin I_1, Yin I_2) &= E[1(Xin I_1, Yin I_2)]\
      &= E[1(Xin I_1)1(Yin I_2)]\
      &= E[lim_ntoinftyf_n(X)lim_mtoinftyg_m(Y)]\
      &= lim_ntoinftyE[f_n(X)lim_mtoinftyg_m(Y)]quad text(by monotone convergence)\
      &= lim_ntoinftylim_mtoinftyE[f_n(X)g_m(Y)]quad text(by m.c.)\
      &= lim_ntoinftylim_mtoinftyE[f_n(X)]E[g_m(Y)]quad text(by assumption)\
      &= E[1(Xin I_1)]E[1(Yin I_2)]quad text(by m.c.)\
      &=P(Xin I_1)P(Yin I_2),\
      endalign*
      hence the claim.



      Question: Is my above proof correct?









      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Aug 16 at 9:29

























      asked Aug 16 at 9:23









      Epiousios

      1,501522




      1,501522




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          You cannot take closed intervals in this argument. The argument works if you take open intervals.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • Is that because otherwise I would not be able to find $f_n$ and $g_n$ with $$f_n(cdot)uparrow 1(cdotin I_1), quad g_n(cdot)uparrow 1(cdotin I_2)?$$
            – Epiousios
            Aug 16 at 9:40






          • 1




            Yes, you can do this for open intervals but not for closed intervals.
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            Aug 16 at 9:47










          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2884580%2ftwo-random-variables-are-independent-if-all-continuous-and-bounded-transformatio%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          You cannot take closed intervals in this argument. The argument works if you take open intervals.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • Is that because otherwise I would not be able to find $f_n$ and $g_n$ with $$f_n(cdot)uparrow 1(cdotin I_1), quad g_n(cdot)uparrow 1(cdotin I_2)?$$
            – Epiousios
            Aug 16 at 9:40






          • 1




            Yes, you can do this for open intervals but not for closed intervals.
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            Aug 16 at 9:47














          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          You cannot take closed intervals in this argument. The argument works if you take open intervals.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • Is that because otherwise I would not be able to find $f_n$ and $g_n$ with $$f_n(cdot)uparrow 1(cdotin I_1), quad g_n(cdot)uparrow 1(cdotin I_2)?$$
            – Epiousios
            Aug 16 at 9:40






          • 1




            Yes, you can do this for open intervals but not for closed intervals.
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            Aug 16 at 9:47












          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted






          You cannot take closed intervals in this argument. The argument works if you take open intervals.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          You cannot take closed intervals in this argument. The argument works if you take open intervals.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Aug 16 at 9:29









          Kavi Rama Murthy

          22.6k2933




          22.6k2933











          • Is that because otherwise I would not be able to find $f_n$ and $g_n$ with $$f_n(cdot)uparrow 1(cdotin I_1), quad g_n(cdot)uparrow 1(cdotin I_2)?$$
            – Epiousios
            Aug 16 at 9:40






          • 1




            Yes, you can do this for open intervals but not for closed intervals.
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            Aug 16 at 9:47
















          • Is that because otherwise I would not be able to find $f_n$ and $g_n$ with $$f_n(cdot)uparrow 1(cdotin I_1), quad g_n(cdot)uparrow 1(cdotin I_2)?$$
            – Epiousios
            Aug 16 at 9:40






          • 1




            Yes, you can do this for open intervals but not for closed intervals.
            – Kavi Rama Murthy
            Aug 16 at 9:47















          Is that because otherwise I would not be able to find $f_n$ and $g_n$ with $$f_n(cdot)uparrow 1(cdotin I_1), quad g_n(cdot)uparrow 1(cdotin I_2)?$$
          – Epiousios
          Aug 16 at 9:40




          Is that because otherwise I would not be able to find $f_n$ and $g_n$ with $$f_n(cdot)uparrow 1(cdotin I_1), quad g_n(cdot)uparrow 1(cdotin I_2)?$$
          – Epiousios
          Aug 16 at 9:40




          1




          1




          Yes, you can do this for open intervals but not for closed intervals.
          – Kavi Rama Murthy
          Aug 16 at 9:47




          Yes, you can do this for open intervals but not for closed intervals.
          – Kavi Rama Murthy
          Aug 16 at 9:47












           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2884580%2ftwo-random-variables-are-independent-if-all-continuous-and-bounded-transformatio%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          Is there any way to eliminate the singular point to solve this integral by hand or by approximations?

          Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

          Carbon dioxide