How is this equation obtained? $int_0^infty fracx^s-1 dxe^x-1=Pi(s-1)zeta(s) $ [duplicate]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite













This question already has an answer here:



  • Integral Representation of the Zeta Function: $zeta(s)=frac1Gamma(s)int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x-1dx$

    2 answers



This equation:
$$int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x-1 dx=Pi(s-1)zeta(s) $$
was used by Riemann in his famous paper from 1859.
Seemingly it follows from:
$$ int_0^infty e^-nxx^s-1dx= fracPi(s-1)n^s$$



a result achieved by repeated integration by parts. How does the first equation follows from the second?







share|cite|improve this question














marked as duplicate by Simply Beautiful Art, Lord Shark the Unknown, max_zorn, amWhy integration
Users with the  integration badge can single-handedly close integration questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

);
);
);
Aug 17 at 11:12


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.














  • To display exponents correctly, put it in braces (i.e. use "^s - 1" and the like).
    – metamorphy
    Aug 16 at 9:26










  • Regarding your question - yes, the link is $displaystylefrac1e^x - 1 = sum_n = 1^infty e^-nx$.
    – metamorphy
    Aug 16 at 9:27











  • Can you explain or share a link where it is explained how this can be derived?
    – Mister Set
    Aug 16 at 9:36










  • What exactly? The sum or its termwise integration?
    – metamorphy
    Aug 16 at 9:42










  • The termwise integration
    – Mister Set
    Aug 16 at 9:43














up vote
1
down vote

favorite













This question already has an answer here:



  • Integral Representation of the Zeta Function: $zeta(s)=frac1Gamma(s)int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x-1dx$

    2 answers



This equation:
$$int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x-1 dx=Pi(s-1)zeta(s) $$
was used by Riemann in his famous paper from 1859.
Seemingly it follows from:
$$ int_0^infty e^-nxx^s-1dx= fracPi(s-1)n^s$$



a result achieved by repeated integration by parts. How does the first equation follows from the second?







share|cite|improve this question














marked as duplicate by Simply Beautiful Art, Lord Shark the Unknown, max_zorn, amWhy integration
Users with the  integration badge can single-handedly close integration questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

);
);
);
Aug 17 at 11:12


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.














  • To display exponents correctly, put it in braces (i.e. use "^s - 1" and the like).
    – metamorphy
    Aug 16 at 9:26










  • Regarding your question - yes, the link is $displaystylefrac1e^x - 1 = sum_n = 1^infty e^-nx$.
    – metamorphy
    Aug 16 at 9:27











  • Can you explain or share a link where it is explained how this can be derived?
    – Mister Set
    Aug 16 at 9:36










  • What exactly? The sum or its termwise integration?
    – metamorphy
    Aug 16 at 9:42










  • The termwise integration
    – Mister Set
    Aug 16 at 9:43












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite












This question already has an answer here:



  • Integral Representation of the Zeta Function: $zeta(s)=frac1Gamma(s)int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x-1dx$

    2 answers



This equation:
$$int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x-1 dx=Pi(s-1)zeta(s) $$
was used by Riemann in his famous paper from 1859.
Seemingly it follows from:
$$ int_0^infty e^-nxx^s-1dx= fracPi(s-1)n^s$$



a result achieved by repeated integration by parts. How does the first equation follows from the second?







share|cite|improve this question















This question already has an answer here:



  • Integral Representation of the Zeta Function: $zeta(s)=frac1Gamma(s)int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x-1dx$

    2 answers



This equation:
$$int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x-1 dx=Pi(s-1)zeta(s) $$
was used by Riemann in his famous paper from 1859.
Seemingly it follows from:
$$ int_0^infty e^-nxx^s-1dx= fracPi(s-1)n^s$$



a result achieved by repeated integration by parts. How does the first equation follows from the second?





This question already has an answer here:



  • Integral Representation of the Zeta Function: $zeta(s)=frac1Gamma(s)int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x-1dx$

    2 answers









share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 16 at 9:34









tmaths

1,332113




1,332113










asked Aug 16 at 9:23









Mister Set

504210




504210




marked as duplicate by Simply Beautiful Art, Lord Shark the Unknown, max_zorn, amWhy integration
Users with the  integration badge can single-handedly close integration questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

);
);
);
Aug 17 at 11:12


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.






marked as duplicate by Simply Beautiful Art, Lord Shark the Unknown, max_zorn, amWhy integration
Users with the  integration badge can single-handedly close integration questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

);
);
);
Aug 17 at 11:12


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.













  • To display exponents correctly, put it in braces (i.e. use "^s - 1" and the like).
    – metamorphy
    Aug 16 at 9:26










  • Regarding your question - yes, the link is $displaystylefrac1e^x - 1 = sum_n = 1^infty e^-nx$.
    – metamorphy
    Aug 16 at 9:27











  • Can you explain or share a link where it is explained how this can be derived?
    – Mister Set
    Aug 16 at 9:36










  • What exactly? The sum or its termwise integration?
    – metamorphy
    Aug 16 at 9:42










  • The termwise integration
    – Mister Set
    Aug 16 at 9:43
















  • To display exponents correctly, put it in braces (i.e. use "^s - 1" and the like).
    – metamorphy
    Aug 16 at 9:26










  • Regarding your question - yes, the link is $displaystylefrac1e^x - 1 = sum_n = 1^infty e^-nx$.
    – metamorphy
    Aug 16 at 9:27











  • Can you explain or share a link where it is explained how this can be derived?
    – Mister Set
    Aug 16 at 9:36










  • What exactly? The sum or its termwise integration?
    – metamorphy
    Aug 16 at 9:42










  • The termwise integration
    – Mister Set
    Aug 16 at 9:43















To display exponents correctly, put it in braces (i.e. use "^s - 1" and the like).
– metamorphy
Aug 16 at 9:26




To display exponents correctly, put it in braces (i.e. use "^s - 1" and the like).
– metamorphy
Aug 16 at 9:26












Regarding your question - yes, the link is $displaystylefrac1e^x - 1 = sum_n = 1^infty e^-nx$.
– metamorphy
Aug 16 at 9:27





Regarding your question - yes, the link is $displaystylefrac1e^x - 1 = sum_n = 1^infty e^-nx$.
– metamorphy
Aug 16 at 9:27













Can you explain or share a link where it is explained how this can be derived?
– Mister Set
Aug 16 at 9:36




Can you explain or share a link where it is explained how this can be derived?
– Mister Set
Aug 16 at 9:36












What exactly? The sum or its termwise integration?
– metamorphy
Aug 16 at 9:42




What exactly? The sum or its termwise integration?
– metamorphy
Aug 16 at 9:42












The termwise integration
– Mister Set
Aug 16 at 9:43




The termwise integration
– Mister Set
Aug 16 at 9:43










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













First we have that $$int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x-1dx = int_0^infty x^s-1sum _n=0^inftye^-nxdx$$ Beliveing in uniform convergence we swap the sum and the integral to get $$sum _n=0^inftyint_0^infty x^s-1e^-nxdx$$ with a simple change of variable, we set $nx = t$ so $dt = ndx$, then $$sum _n=0^inftyint_0^infty x^s-1e^-nxdx = sum _n=0^inftyint_0^infty frac1nleft(fractnright)^s-1e^-tdt = underbracesum_n=0^infty n^-s_textDef. of zeta(s)underbraceint_0^infty t^s-1e^-tdt_textDef. of Gamma(s) = zeta(s)Gamma(s)$$ Just remember now the relation between the pi function and the Euler gamma function $$Pi(z) = Gamma(z+1)$$






share|cite|improve this answer



























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    A faster way to find the second equation would be to simply make the substitution $u = nx$ which leads to :



    $$ int_0^infty e^-u left( fracunright)^s-1 fracdun = fracPi(s-1)n^s quad quad (*)$$



    You can also write :



    $$ int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x - 1dx = int_0^infty e^-x x^s-1frac11 - e^-xdx$$



    And, you can write (geometric series) :



    $$ forall x >0, frac11 - e^-x = sum_n=0^infty e^-nx$$



    which leads to



    $$ int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x - 1dx = int_0^infty e^-x x^s-1sum_n=0^infty e^-nx dx $$



    We can easily switch sum and integral, indeed :



    $$ forall n in mathbb N, sum_k=0^n e^-(n+1)x x^s-1 leqslant e^-x x^s-1 = varphi(x) $$



    so we can apply the dominated convergence theorem with $varphi in L^1(mathbb R_+^*)$. Using $(*)$ :



    $$ int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x - 1dx = sum_n=0^infty fracPi(s-1)(n+1)^s $$



    Which is exactly :



    $$ int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x - 1dx = Pi(s-1)zeta(s) $$






    share|cite|improve this answer






















    • Why is it valid to switch the sum and the integral?
      – Mister Set
      Aug 16 at 9:56










    • @MisterSet What is the background you have? Are you aware of e.g. this?
      – metamorphy
      Aug 16 at 10:23


















    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote













    First we have that $$int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x-1dx = int_0^infty x^s-1sum _n=0^inftye^-nxdx$$ Beliveing in uniform convergence we swap the sum and the integral to get $$sum _n=0^inftyint_0^infty x^s-1e^-nxdx$$ with a simple change of variable, we set $nx = t$ so $dt = ndx$, then $$sum _n=0^inftyint_0^infty x^s-1e^-nxdx = sum _n=0^inftyint_0^infty frac1nleft(fractnright)^s-1e^-tdt = underbracesum_n=0^infty n^-s_textDef. of zeta(s)underbraceint_0^infty t^s-1e^-tdt_textDef. of Gamma(s) = zeta(s)Gamma(s)$$ Just remember now the relation between the pi function and the Euler gamma function $$Pi(z) = Gamma(z+1)$$






    share|cite|improve this answer
























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      First we have that $$int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x-1dx = int_0^infty x^s-1sum _n=0^inftye^-nxdx$$ Beliveing in uniform convergence we swap the sum and the integral to get $$sum _n=0^inftyint_0^infty x^s-1e^-nxdx$$ with a simple change of variable, we set $nx = t$ so $dt = ndx$, then $$sum _n=0^inftyint_0^infty x^s-1e^-nxdx = sum _n=0^inftyint_0^infty frac1nleft(fractnright)^s-1e^-tdt = underbracesum_n=0^infty n^-s_textDef. of zeta(s)underbraceint_0^infty t^s-1e^-tdt_textDef. of Gamma(s) = zeta(s)Gamma(s)$$ Just remember now the relation between the pi function and the Euler gamma function $$Pi(z) = Gamma(z+1)$$






      share|cite|improve this answer






















        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        First we have that $$int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x-1dx = int_0^infty x^s-1sum _n=0^inftye^-nxdx$$ Beliveing in uniform convergence we swap the sum and the integral to get $$sum _n=0^inftyint_0^infty x^s-1e^-nxdx$$ with a simple change of variable, we set $nx = t$ so $dt = ndx$, then $$sum _n=0^inftyint_0^infty x^s-1e^-nxdx = sum _n=0^inftyint_0^infty frac1nleft(fractnright)^s-1e^-tdt = underbracesum_n=0^infty n^-s_textDef. of zeta(s)underbraceint_0^infty t^s-1e^-tdt_textDef. of Gamma(s) = zeta(s)Gamma(s)$$ Just remember now the relation between the pi function and the Euler gamma function $$Pi(z) = Gamma(z+1)$$






        share|cite|improve this answer












        First we have that $$int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x-1dx = int_0^infty x^s-1sum _n=0^inftye^-nxdx$$ Beliveing in uniform convergence we swap the sum and the integral to get $$sum _n=0^inftyint_0^infty x^s-1e^-nxdx$$ with a simple change of variable, we set $nx = t$ so $dt = ndx$, then $$sum _n=0^inftyint_0^infty x^s-1e^-nxdx = sum _n=0^inftyint_0^infty frac1nleft(fractnright)^s-1e^-tdt = underbracesum_n=0^infty n^-s_textDef. of zeta(s)underbraceint_0^infty t^s-1e^-tdt_textDef. of Gamma(s) = zeta(s)Gamma(s)$$ Just remember now the relation between the pi function and the Euler gamma function $$Pi(z) = Gamma(z+1)$$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Aug 16 at 9:45









        Davide Morgante

        2,357322




        2,357322




















            up vote
            1
            down vote













            A faster way to find the second equation would be to simply make the substitution $u = nx$ which leads to :



            $$ int_0^infty e^-u left( fracunright)^s-1 fracdun = fracPi(s-1)n^s quad quad (*)$$



            You can also write :



            $$ int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x - 1dx = int_0^infty e^-x x^s-1frac11 - e^-xdx$$



            And, you can write (geometric series) :



            $$ forall x >0, frac11 - e^-x = sum_n=0^infty e^-nx$$



            which leads to



            $$ int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x - 1dx = int_0^infty e^-x x^s-1sum_n=0^infty e^-nx dx $$



            We can easily switch sum and integral, indeed :



            $$ forall n in mathbb N, sum_k=0^n e^-(n+1)x x^s-1 leqslant e^-x x^s-1 = varphi(x) $$



            so we can apply the dominated convergence theorem with $varphi in L^1(mathbb R_+^*)$. Using $(*)$ :



            $$ int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x - 1dx = sum_n=0^infty fracPi(s-1)(n+1)^s $$



            Which is exactly :



            $$ int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x - 1dx = Pi(s-1)zeta(s) $$






            share|cite|improve this answer






















            • Why is it valid to switch the sum and the integral?
              – Mister Set
              Aug 16 at 9:56










            • @MisterSet What is the background you have? Are you aware of e.g. this?
              – metamorphy
              Aug 16 at 10:23















            up vote
            1
            down vote













            A faster way to find the second equation would be to simply make the substitution $u = nx$ which leads to :



            $$ int_0^infty e^-u left( fracunright)^s-1 fracdun = fracPi(s-1)n^s quad quad (*)$$



            You can also write :



            $$ int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x - 1dx = int_0^infty e^-x x^s-1frac11 - e^-xdx$$



            And, you can write (geometric series) :



            $$ forall x >0, frac11 - e^-x = sum_n=0^infty e^-nx$$



            which leads to



            $$ int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x - 1dx = int_0^infty e^-x x^s-1sum_n=0^infty e^-nx dx $$



            We can easily switch sum and integral, indeed :



            $$ forall n in mathbb N, sum_k=0^n e^-(n+1)x x^s-1 leqslant e^-x x^s-1 = varphi(x) $$



            so we can apply the dominated convergence theorem with $varphi in L^1(mathbb R_+^*)$. Using $(*)$ :



            $$ int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x - 1dx = sum_n=0^infty fracPi(s-1)(n+1)^s $$



            Which is exactly :



            $$ int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x - 1dx = Pi(s-1)zeta(s) $$






            share|cite|improve this answer






















            • Why is it valid to switch the sum and the integral?
              – Mister Set
              Aug 16 at 9:56










            • @MisterSet What is the background you have? Are you aware of e.g. this?
              – metamorphy
              Aug 16 at 10:23













            up vote
            1
            down vote










            up vote
            1
            down vote









            A faster way to find the second equation would be to simply make the substitution $u = nx$ which leads to :



            $$ int_0^infty e^-u left( fracunright)^s-1 fracdun = fracPi(s-1)n^s quad quad (*)$$



            You can also write :



            $$ int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x - 1dx = int_0^infty e^-x x^s-1frac11 - e^-xdx$$



            And, you can write (geometric series) :



            $$ forall x >0, frac11 - e^-x = sum_n=0^infty e^-nx$$



            which leads to



            $$ int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x - 1dx = int_0^infty e^-x x^s-1sum_n=0^infty e^-nx dx $$



            We can easily switch sum and integral, indeed :



            $$ forall n in mathbb N, sum_k=0^n e^-(n+1)x x^s-1 leqslant e^-x x^s-1 = varphi(x) $$



            so we can apply the dominated convergence theorem with $varphi in L^1(mathbb R_+^*)$. Using $(*)$ :



            $$ int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x - 1dx = sum_n=0^infty fracPi(s-1)(n+1)^s $$



            Which is exactly :



            $$ int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x - 1dx = Pi(s-1)zeta(s) $$






            share|cite|improve this answer














            A faster way to find the second equation would be to simply make the substitution $u = nx$ which leads to :



            $$ int_0^infty e^-u left( fracunright)^s-1 fracdun = fracPi(s-1)n^s quad quad (*)$$



            You can also write :



            $$ int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x - 1dx = int_0^infty e^-x x^s-1frac11 - e^-xdx$$



            And, you can write (geometric series) :



            $$ forall x >0, frac11 - e^-x = sum_n=0^infty e^-nx$$



            which leads to



            $$ int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x - 1dx = int_0^infty e^-x x^s-1sum_n=0^infty e^-nx dx $$



            We can easily switch sum and integral, indeed :



            $$ forall n in mathbb N, sum_k=0^n e^-(n+1)x x^s-1 leqslant e^-x x^s-1 = varphi(x) $$



            so we can apply the dominated convergence theorem with $varphi in L^1(mathbb R_+^*)$. Using $(*)$ :



            $$ int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x - 1dx = sum_n=0^infty fracPi(s-1)(n+1)^s $$



            Which is exactly :



            $$ int_0^infty fracx^s-1e^x - 1dx = Pi(s-1)zeta(s) $$







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Aug 16 at 10:07

























            answered Aug 16 at 9:43









            tmaths

            1,332113




            1,332113











            • Why is it valid to switch the sum and the integral?
              – Mister Set
              Aug 16 at 9:56










            • @MisterSet What is the background you have? Are you aware of e.g. this?
              – metamorphy
              Aug 16 at 10:23

















            • Why is it valid to switch the sum and the integral?
              – Mister Set
              Aug 16 at 9:56










            • @MisterSet What is the background you have? Are you aware of e.g. this?
              – metamorphy
              Aug 16 at 10:23
















            Why is it valid to switch the sum and the integral?
            – Mister Set
            Aug 16 at 9:56




            Why is it valid to switch the sum and the integral?
            – Mister Set
            Aug 16 at 9:56












            @MisterSet What is the background you have? Are you aware of e.g. this?
            – metamorphy
            Aug 16 at 10:23





            @MisterSet What is the background you have? Are you aware of e.g. this?
            – metamorphy
            Aug 16 at 10:23



            這個網誌中的熱門文章

            Is there any way to eliminate the singular point to solve this integral by hand or by approximations?

            Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

            Carbon dioxide