If $A$ is absolutely flat then every primary ideal is maximal

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Given the ring $A$ is commutative with an identity element.



If $A$ is absolutely flat (i.e. each $A$-module is flat) then every primary ideal is maximal.



This exercise 4.3 comes from the classical text of Atiyah-Macdonald : introduction to the commutative algebra.



Attempt:



Suppose $mathfrakq$ is a primary ideal in $A$ and fix an $xin A-mathfrakq.$ Then $barxin A/mathfrakq$ is non-zero since $xnotinmathfrakq$



Recall that $A$ is absolutely flat $Longleftrightarrow$ every principal ideal is idempotent.



Then as $xinlangle xrangle=langle x^2rangle$, we have $x=ax^2$ for some $ain A$ and hence $x(ax-1)=0inmathfrakq$ and we thus have $(ax-1)^ninmathfrakq$ for some integer $n>0$ since $xnotinmathfrakq.$



Therefore, we get that $(ax-1)^n=bar0$ in $A/mathfrakq$. It follows that $barabarx-bar1in A/mathfrakq$ is nilpotent and thus $barabarx=(barabarx-bar1)+bar1in A/mathfrakq$ is unit which implies $barxin A/mathfrakq$ is unit. Therefore, $A/mathfrakq$ is a field. It follows that $mathfrakq$ must be a maximal ideal in $A$.



I am not very sure if my proof is valid. Any suggestion or comment I will be grateful.







share|cite|improve this question




















  • Next time, please consider posting in self-answered question format. That way makes the best use of the architecture here. Thanks
    – rschwieb
    Aug 16 at 13:54















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Given the ring $A$ is commutative with an identity element.



If $A$ is absolutely flat (i.e. each $A$-module is flat) then every primary ideal is maximal.



This exercise 4.3 comes from the classical text of Atiyah-Macdonald : introduction to the commutative algebra.



Attempt:



Suppose $mathfrakq$ is a primary ideal in $A$ and fix an $xin A-mathfrakq.$ Then $barxin A/mathfrakq$ is non-zero since $xnotinmathfrakq$



Recall that $A$ is absolutely flat $Longleftrightarrow$ every principal ideal is idempotent.



Then as $xinlangle xrangle=langle x^2rangle$, we have $x=ax^2$ for some $ain A$ and hence $x(ax-1)=0inmathfrakq$ and we thus have $(ax-1)^ninmathfrakq$ for some integer $n>0$ since $xnotinmathfrakq.$



Therefore, we get that $(ax-1)^n=bar0$ in $A/mathfrakq$. It follows that $barabarx-bar1in A/mathfrakq$ is nilpotent and thus $barabarx=(barabarx-bar1)+bar1in A/mathfrakq$ is unit which implies $barxin A/mathfrakq$ is unit. Therefore, $A/mathfrakq$ is a field. It follows that $mathfrakq$ must be a maximal ideal in $A$.



I am not very sure if my proof is valid. Any suggestion or comment I will be grateful.







share|cite|improve this question




















  • Next time, please consider posting in self-answered question format. That way makes the best use of the architecture here. Thanks
    – rschwieb
    Aug 16 at 13:54













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











Given the ring $A$ is commutative with an identity element.



If $A$ is absolutely flat (i.e. each $A$-module is flat) then every primary ideal is maximal.



This exercise 4.3 comes from the classical text of Atiyah-Macdonald : introduction to the commutative algebra.



Attempt:



Suppose $mathfrakq$ is a primary ideal in $A$ and fix an $xin A-mathfrakq.$ Then $barxin A/mathfrakq$ is non-zero since $xnotinmathfrakq$



Recall that $A$ is absolutely flat $Longleftrightarrow$ every principal ideal is idempotent.



Then as $xinlangle xrangle=langle x^2rangle$, we have $x=ax^2$ for some $ain A$ and hence $x(ax-1)=0inmathfrakq$ and we thus have $(ax-1)^ninmathfrakq$ for some integer $n>0$ since $xnotinmathfrakq.$



Therefore, we get that $(ax-1)^n=bar0$ in $A/mathfrakq$. It follows that $barabarx-bar1in A/mathfrakq$ is nilpotent and thus $barabarx=(barabarx-bar1)+bar1in A/mathfrakq$ is unit which implies $barxin A/mathfrakq$ is unit. Therefore, $A/mathfrakq$ is a field. It follows that $mathfrakq$ must be a maximal ideal in $A$.



I am not very sure if my proof is valid. Any suggestion or comment I will be grateful.







share|cite|improve this question












Given the ring $A$ is commutative with an identity element.



If $A$ is absolutely flat (i.e. each $A$-module is flat) then every primary ideal is maximal.



This exercise 4.3 comes from the classical text of Atiyah-Macdonald : introduction to the commutative algebra.



Attempt:



Suppose $mathfrakq$ is a primary ideal in $A$ and fix an $xin A-mathfrakq.$ Then $barxin A/mathfrakq$ is non-zero since $xnotinmathfrakq$



Recall that $A$ is absolutely flat $Longleftrightarrow$ every principal ideal is idempotent.



Then as $xinlangle xrangle=langle x^2rangle$, we have $x=ax^2$ for some $ain A$ and hence $x(ax-1)=0inmathfrakq$ and we thus have $(ax-1)^ninmathfrakq$ for some integer $n>0$ since $xnotinmathfrakq.$



Therefore, we get that $(ax-1)^n=bar0$ in $A/mathfrakq$. It follows that $barabarx-bar1in A/mathfrakq$ is nilpotent and thus $barabarx=(barabarx-bar1)+bar1in A/mathfrakq$ is unit which implies $barxin A/mathfrakq$ is unit. Therefore, $A/mathfrakq$ is a field. It follows that $mathfrakq$ must be a maximal ideal in $A$.



I am not very sure if my proof is valid. Any suggestion or comment I will be grateful.









share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Aug 16 at 6:14









user1992

6671410




6671410











  • Next time, please consider posting in self-answered question format. That way makes the best use of the architecture here. Thanks
    – rschwieb
    Aug 16 at 13:54

















  • Next time, please consider posting in self-answered question format. That way makes the best use of the architecture here. Thanks
    – rschwieb
    Aug 16 at 13:54
















Next time, please consider posting in self-answered question format. That way makes the best use of the architecture here. Thanks
– rschwieb
Aug 16 at 13:54





Next time, please consider posting in self-answered question format. That way makes the best use of the architecture here. Thanks
– rschwieb
Aug 16 at 13:54











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










This is a perfect proof, and very neatly written. Obviously, you are on a level where you no longer need this kind of supervision. You can determine if a proof is correct or not.



Or is there a particular point in the proof that you are uncertain about?






share|cite|improve this answer




















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );








     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2884454%2fif-a-is-absolutely-flat-then-every-primary-ideal-is-maximal%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted










    This is a perfect proof, and very neatly written. Obviously, you are on a level where you no longer need this kind of supervision. You can determine if a proof is correct or not.



    Or is there a particular point in the proof that you are uncertain about?






    share|cite|improve this answer
























      up vote
      1
      down vote



      accepted










      This is a perfect proof, and very neatly written. Obviously, you are on a level where you no longer need this kind of supervision. You can determine if a proof is correct or not.



      Or is there a particular point in the proof that you are uncertain about?






      share|cite|improve this answer






















        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted






        This is a perfect proof, and very neatly written. Obviously, you are on a level where you no longer need this kind of supervision. You can determine if a proof is correct or not.



        Or is there a particular point in the proof that you are uncertain about?






        share|cite|improve this answer












        This is a perfect proof, and very neatly written. Obviously, you are on a level where you no longer need this kind of supervision. You can determine if a proof is correct or not.



        Or is there a particular point in the proof that you are uncertain about?







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Aug 16 at 6:44









        A. Pongrácz

        3,827625




        3,827625






















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


























             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2884454%2fif-a-is-absolutely-flat-then-every-primary-ideal-is-maximal%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            這個網誌中的熱門文章

            Is there any way to eliminate the singular point to solve this integral by hand or by approximations?

            Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

            Carbon dioxide