Natural parameterization of the following curve

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












The given curve is: $ 27 x^2 = 4 y^3 $.
I have to find the natural parameterization.
First, I parameterized the curve:
$$ 27 x^2 = 4 y^3 $$
$$ x = pm sqrtfrac427 y^3 $$
What should I do when I have two possibilities?
I took one possibility, for example: $$ x = sqrtfrac427 y^3 $$
Parameterization: $$ alpha (t) = (sqrtfrac427 t^3,t) $$



The other steps:
$$ alpha ' (t) = (fracsqrttsqrt3,1) $$
$$ || alpha ' (t) || = frac1sqrt3 sqrtt+3 $$
$$s(t) = frac1sqrt3 int_0^t sqrtu+3 du = frac1sqrt3(frac23(t+3)^frac32- 2sqrt3)$$
Did I go wrong at some point? It became too complicated, so I need help. Thanks!







share|cite|improve this question
























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite












    The given curve is: $ 27 x^2 = 4 y^3 $.
    I have to find the natural parameterization.
    First, I parameterized the curve:
    $$ 27 x^2 = 4 y^3 $$
    $$ x = pm sqrtfrac427 y^3 $$
    What should I do when I have two possibilities?
    I took one possibility, for example: $$ x = sqrtfrac427 y^3 $$
    Parameterization: $$ alpha (t) = (sqrtfrac427 t^3,t) $$



    The other steps:
    $$ alpha ' (t) = (fracsqrttsqrt3,1) $$
    $$ || alpha ' (t) || = frac1sqrt3 sqrtt+3 $$
    $$s(t) = frac1sqrt3 int_0^t sqrtu+3 du = frac1sqrt3(frac23(t+3)^frac32- 2sqrt3)$$
    Did I go wrong at some point? It became too complicated, so I need help. Thanks!







    share|cite|improve this question






















      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite











      The given curve is: $ 27 x^2 = 4 y^3 $.
      I have to find the natural parameterization.
      First, I parameterized the curve:
      $$ 27 x^2 = 4 y^3 $$
      $$ x = pm sqrtfrac427 y^3 $$
      What should I do when I have two possibilities?
      I took one possibility, for example: $$ x = sqrtfrac427 y^3 $$
      Parameterization: $$ alpha (t) = (sqrtfrac427 t^3,t) $$



      The other steps:
      $$ alpha ' (t) = (fracsqrttsqrt3,1) $$
      $$ || alpha ' (t) || = frac1sqrt3 sqrtt+3 $$
      $$s(t) = frac1sqrt3 int_0^t sqrtu+3 du = frac1sqrt3(frac23(t+3)^frac32- 2sqrt3)$$
      Did I go wrong at some point? It became too complicated, so I need help. Thanks!







      share|cite|improve this question












      The given curve is: $ 27 x^2 = 4 y^3 $.
      I have to find the natural parameterization.
      First, I parameterized the curve:
      $$ 27 x^2 = 4 y^3 $$
      $$ x = pm sqrtfrac427 y^3 $$
      What should I do when I have two possibilities?
      I took one possibility, for example: $$ x = sqrtfrac427 y^3 $$
      Parameterization: $$ alpha (t) = (sqrtfrac427 t^3,t) $$



      The other steps:
      $$ alpha ' (t) = (fracsqrttsqrt3,1) $$
      $$ || alpha ' (t) || = frac1sqrt3 sqrtt+3 $$
      $$s(t) = frac1sqrt3 int_0^t sqrtu+3 du = frac1sqrt3(frac23(t+3)^frac32- 2sqrt3)$$
      Did I go wrong at some point? It became too complicated, so I need help. Thanks!









      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Aug 16 at 10:12









      stakindmidl

      574




      574




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          What you did fine. Now, you invert $s$:$$s^-1(t)=frac3sqrt[3](t+2)^2sqrt[3]4-3.$$So, a natural parametrisation of your curve is$$tmapstoalphabigl(s^-1(t)bigr)=left(fracleft(sqrt[3]2(t+2)^2-2right)^frac32sqrt2,left(frac3sqrt[3](t+2)^2sqrt[3]4-3right)^2right)$$






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • one question, what should I do with the $ pm $ ? Should I do both cases?
            – stakindmidl
            Aug 16 at 11:44






          • 1




            Note the your curve has acorner at $(0,0)$. THerefore, there is na way you can obtain the whole curve by this process. But you can get a natural parametrization of the other half adding a $-$ sign to the second component of my answer.
            – José Carlos Santos
            Aug 16 at 11:46










          • @ChristianBlatter Right: cusp. I couldn't remember the right word and that's why I used “corner” instead. The $x$ was typo, which I have edited. Thank you.
            – José Carlos Santos
            Aug 16 at 13:51










          • The curve is $y=|x|^2/3$ $>(-infty<x<infty)$. It has a characteristic cusp, not a "corner", at the origin. Concerning your comment: The curve is lying completely in the upper half plane.
            – Christian Blatter
            Aug 16 at 14:13










          • @ChristianBlatter It's a pity that I can't edit that comment. The $-$ sign should be put on the first component, of course.
            – José Carlos Santos
            Aug 16 at 14:55

















          up vote
          3
          down vote













          If we write $x=2t^3$ then we have $$dfracy^327=dfracx^24=t^6implies y=3t^2.$$



          Thus we get $$alpha(t)=(2t^3,3t^2),$$ which is a nice parametrization to get the length of the curve.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );








             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2884625%2fnatural-parameterization-of-the-following-curve%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            1
            down vote



            accepted










            What you did fine. Now, you invert $s$:$$s^-1(t)=frac3sqrt[3](t+2)^2sqrt[3]4-3.$$So, a natural parametrisation of your curve is$$tmapstoalphabigl(s^-1(t)bigr)=left(fracleft(sqrt[3]2(t+2)^2-2right)^frac32sqrt2,left(frac3sqrt[3](t+2)^2sqrt[3]4-3right)^2right)$$






            share|cite|improve this answer






















            • one question, what should I do with the $ pm $ ? Should I do both cases?
              – stakindmidl
              Aug 16 at 11:44






            • 1




              Note the your curve has acorner at $(0,0)$. THerefore, there is na way you can obtain the whole curve by this process. But you can get a natural parametrization of the other half adding a $-$ sign to the second component of my answer.
              – José Carlos Santos
              Aug 16 at 11:46










            • @ChristianBlatter Right: cusp. I couldn't remember the right word and that's why I used “corner” instead. The $x$ was typo, which I have edited. Thank you.
              – José Carlos Santos
              Aug 16 at 13:51










            • The curve is $y=|x|^2/3$ $>(-infty<x<infty)$. It has a characteristic cusp, not a "corner", at the origin. Concerning your comment: The curve is lying completely in the upper half plane.
              – Christian Blatter
              Aug 16 at 14:13










            • @ChristianBlatter It's a pity that I can't edit that comment. The $-$ sign should be put on the first component, of course.
              – José Carlos Santos
              Aug 16 at 14:55














            up vote
            1
            down vote



            accepted










            What you did fine. Now, you invert $s$:$$s^-1(t)=frac3sqrt[3](t+2)^2sqrt[3]4-3.$$So, a natural parametrisation of your curve is$$tmapstoalphabigl(s^-1(t)bigr)=left(fracleft(sqrt[3]2(t+2)^2-2right)^frac32sqrt2,left(frac3sqrt[3](t+2)^2sqrt[3]4-3right)^2right)$$






            share|cite|improve this answer






















            • one question, what should I do with the $ pm $ ? Should I do both cases?
              – stakindmidl
              Aug 16 at 11:44






            • 1




              Note the your curve has acorner at $(0,0)$. THerefore, there is na way you can obtain the whole curve by this process. But you can get a natural parametrization of the other half adding a $-$ sign to the second component of my answer.
              – José Carlos Santos
              Aug 16 at 11:46










            • @ChristianBlatter Right: cusp. I couldn't remember the right word and that's why I used “corner” instead. The $x$ was typo, which I have edited. Thank you.
              – José Carlos Santos
              Aug 16 at 13:51










            • The curve is $y=|x|^2/3$ $>(-infty<x<infty)$. It has a characteristic cusp, not a "corner", at the origin. Concerning your comment: The curve is lying completely in the upper half plane.
              – Christian Blatter
              Aug 16 at 14:13










            • @ChristianBlatter It's a pity that I can't edit that comment. The $-$ sign should be put on the first component, of course.
              – José Carlos Santos
              Aug 16 at 14:55












            up vote
            1
            down vote



            accepted







            up vote
            1
            down vote



            accepted






            What you did fine. Now, you invert $s$:$$s^-1(t)=frac3sqrt[3](t+2)^2sqrt[3]4-3.$$So, a natural parametrisation of your curve is$$tmapstoalphabigl(s^-1(t)bigr)=left(fracleft(sqrt[3]2(t+2)^2-2right)^frac32sqrt2,left(frac3sqrt[3](t+2)^2sqrt[3]4-3right)^2right)$$






            share|cite|improve this answer














            What you did fine. Now, you invert $s$:$$s^-1(t)=frac3sqrt[3](t+2)^2sqrt[3]4-3.$$So, a natural parametrisation of your curve is$$tmapstoalphabigl(s^-1(t)bigr)=left(fracleft(sqrt[3]2(t+2)^2-2right)^frac32sqrt2,left(frac3sqrt[3](t+2)^2sqrt[3]4-3right)^2right)$$







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Aug 16 at 13:49

























            answered Aug 16 at 10:48









            José Carlos Santos

            117k1699179




            117k1699179











            • one question, what should I do with the $ pm $ ? Should I do both cases?
              – stakindmidl
              Aug 16 at 11:44






            • 1




              Note the your curve has acorner at $(0,0)$. THerefore, there is na way you can obtain the whole curve by this process. But you can get a natural parametrization of the other half adding a $-$ sign to the second component of my answer.
              – José Carlos Santos
              Aug 16 at 11:46










            • @ChristianBlatter Right: cusp. I couldn't remember the right word and that's why I used “corner” instead. The $x$ was typo, which I have edited. Thank you.
              – José Carlos Santos
              Aug 16 at 13:51










            • The curve is $y=|x|^2/3$ $>(-infty<x<infty)$. It has a characteristic cusp, not a "corner", at the origin. Concerning your comment: The curve is lying completely in the upper half plane.
              – Christian Blatter
              Aug 16 at 14:13










            • @ChristianBlatter It's a pity that I can't edit that comment. The $-$ sign should be put on the first component, of course.
              – José Carlos Santos
              Aug 16 at 14:55
















            • one question, what should I do with the $ pm $ ? Should I do both cases?
              – stakindmidl
              Aug 16 at 11:44






            • 1




              Note the your curve has acorner at $(0,0)$. THerefore, there is na way you can obtain the whole curve by this process. But you can get a natural parametrization of the other half adding a $-$ sign to the second component of my answer.
              – José Carlos Santos
              Aug 16 at 11:46










            • @ChristianBlatter Right: cusp. I couldn't remember the right word and that's why I used “corner” instead. The $x$ was typo, which I have edited. Thank you.
              – José Carlos Santos
              Aug 16 at 13:51










            • The curve is $y=|x|^2/3$ $>(-infty<x<infty)$. It has a characteristic cusp, not a "corner", at the origin. Concerning your comment: The curve is lying completely in the upper half plane.
              – Christian Blatter
              Aug 16 at 14:13










            • @ChristianBlatter It's a pity that I can't edit that comment. The $-$ sign should be put on the first component, of course.
              – José Carlos Santos
              Aug 16 at 14:55















            one question, what should I do with the $ pm $ ? Should I do both cases?
            – stakindmidl
            Aug 16 at 11:44




            one question, what should I do with the $ pm $ ? Should I do both cases?
            – stakindmidl
            Aug 16 at 11:44




            1




            1




            Note the your curve has acorner at $(0,0)$. THerefore, there is na way you can obtain the whole curve by this process. But you can get a natural parametrization of the other half adding a $-$ sign to the second component of my answer.
            – José Carlos Santos
            Aug 16 at 11:46




            Note the your curve has acorner at $(0,0)$. THerefore, there is na way you can obtain the whole curve by this process. But you can get a natural parametrization of the other half adding a $-$ sign to the second component of my answer.
            – José Carlos Santos
            Aug 16 at 11:46












            @ChristianBlatter Right: cusp. I couldn't remember the right word and that's why I used “corner” instead. The $x$ was typo, which I have edited. Thank you.
            – José Carlos Santos
            Aug 16 at 13:51




            @ChristianBlatter Right: cusp. I couldn't remember the right word and that's why I used “corner” instead. The $x$ was typo, which I have edited. Thank you.
            – José Carlos Santos
            Aug 16 at 13:51












            The curve is $y=|x|^2/3$ $>(-infty<x<infty)$. It has a characteristic cusp, not a "corner", at the origin. Concerning your comment: The curve is lying completely in the upper half plane.
            – Christian Blatter
            Aug 16 at 14:13




            The curve is $y=|x|^2/3$ $>(-infty<x<infty)$. It has a characteristic cusp, not a "corner", at the origin. Concerning your comment: The curve is lying completely in the upper half plane.
            – Christian Blatter
            Aug 16 at 14:13












            @ChristianBlatter It's a pity that I can't edit that comment. The $-$ sign should be put on the first component, of course.
            – José Carlos Santos
            Aug 16 at 14:55




            @ChristianBlatter It's a pity that I can't edit that comment. The $-$ sign should be put on the first component, of course.
            – José Carlos Santos
            Aug 16 at 14:55










            up vote
            3
            down vote













            If we write $x=2t^3$ then we have $$dfracy^327=dfracx^24=t^6implies y=3t^2.$$



            Thus we get $$alpha(t)=(2t^3,3t^2),$$ which is a nice parametrization to get the length of the curve.






            share|cite|improve this answer
























              up vote
              3
              down vote













              If we write $x=2t^3$ then we have $$dfracy^327=dfracx^24=t^6implies y=3t^2.$$



              Thus we get $$alpha(t)=(2t^3,3t^2),$$ which is a nice parametrization to get the length of the curve.






              share|cite|improve this answer






















                up vote
                3
                down vote










                up vote
                3
                down vote









                If we write $x=2t^3$ then we have $$dfracy^327=dfracx^24=t^6implies y=3t^2.$$



                Thus we get $$alpha(t)=(2t^3,3t^2),$$ which is a nice parametrization to get the length of the curve.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                If we write $x=2t^3$ then we have $$dfracy^327=dfracx^24=t^6implies y=3t^2.$$



                Thus we get $$alpha(t)=(2t^3,3t^2),$$ which is a nice parametrization to get the length of the curve.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Aug 16 at 10:45









                mfl

                24.7k12040




                24.7k12040






















                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded


























                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2884625%2fnatural-parameterization-of-the-following-curve%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    這個網誌中的熱門文章

                    Is there any way to eliminate the singular point to solve this integral by hand or by approximations?

                    Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

                    Carbon dioxide