Where did $a$ and $b$ come from in this eigenvalue problem?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I have this eigenvalue problem:



$$-x^2u_xx + 2xu_x - 2u = lambda x^2 u$$



for $0 < x < 1$, with boundary conditions $u_x(0) = 0, u(1) = u_x(1)$.



I'm trying to find a function $M(x)$, such that under the change of variable $u(x) = M(x)w(x)$, it can be transformed to



$$w_xx = - lambda w$$



for $0 < x < 1$.



The solution says this:




With $u = Mw$, the ODE $-x^2 u'' + 2xu' - 2u = lambda x^2u$ becomes



$$-x^2 (M'' -aM' - bM) + 2x(M' w + Mw') - 2Mw = lambda x^2Mw$$



$$-x^2 Mw'' + (2xM - 2x^2 M')w' + (-x^2 M'' + 2xM' - 2M)w = lambda x^2Mw$$




I was wondering if someone could please explain where the $a$ and $b$ came from? Thanks.







share|cite|improve this question
























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite












    I have this eigenvalue problem:



    $$-x^2u_xx + 2xu_x - 2u = lambda x^2 u$$



    for $0 < x < 1$, with boundary conditions $u_x(0) = 0, u(1) = u_x(1)$.



    I'm trying to find a function $M(x)$, such that under the change of variable $u(x) = M(x)w(x)$, it can be transformed to



    $$w_xx = - lambda w$$



    for $0 < x < 1$.



    The solution says this:




    With $u = Mw$, the ODE $-x^2 u'' + 2xu' - 2u = lambda x^2u$ becomes



    $$-x^2 (M'' -aM' - bM) + 2x(M' w + Mw') - 2Mw = lambda x^2Mw$$



    $$-x^2 Mw'' + (2xM - 2x^2 M')w' + (-x^2 M'' + 2xM' - 2M)w = lambda x^2Mw$$




    I was wondering if someone could please explain where the $a$ and $b$ came from? Thanks.







    share|cite|improve this question






















      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite











      I have this eigenvalue problem:



      $$-x^2u_xx + 2xu_x - 2u = lambda x^2 u$$



      for $0 < x < 1$, with boundary conditions $u_x(0) = 0, u(1) = u_x(1)$.



      I'm trying to find a function $M(x)$, such that under the change of variable $u(x) = M(x)w(x)$, it can be transformed to



      $$w_xx = - lambda w$$



      for $0 < x < 1$.



      The solution says this:




      With $u = Mw$, the ODE $-x^2 u'' + 2xu' - 2u = lambda x^2u$ becomes



      $$-x^2 (M'' -aM' - bM) + 2x(M' w + Mw') - 2Mw = lambda x^2Mw$$



      $$-x^2 Mw'' + (2xM - 2x^2 M')w' + (-x^2 M'' + 2xM' - 2M)w = lambda x^2Mw$$




      I was wondering if someone could please explain where the $a$ and $b$ came from? Thanks.







      share|cite|improve this question












      I have this eigenvalue problem:



      $$-x^2u_xx + 2xu_x - 2u = lambda x^2 u$$



      for $0 < x < 1$, with boundary conditions $u_x(0) = 0, u(1) = u_x(1)$.



      I'm trying to find a function $M(x)$, such that under the change of variable $u(x) = M(x)w(x)$, it can be transformed to



      $$w_xx = - lambda w$$



      for $0 < x < 1$.



      The solution says this:




      With $u = Mw$, the ODE $-x^2 u'' + 2xu' - 2u = lambda x^2u$ becomes



      $$-x^2 (M'' -aM' - bM) + 2x(M' w + Mw') - 2Mw = lambda x^2Mw$$



      $$-x^2 Mw'' + (2xM - 2x^2 M')w' + (-x^2 M'' + 2xM' - 2M)w = lambda x^2Mw$$




      I was wondering if someone could please explain where the $a$ and $b$ came from? Thanks.









      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Aug 16 at 22:42









      Wyuw

      1368




      1368




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted










          Seems like a typo to me, since $u=Mw$ means $u''=M''w +2M'w' +Mw''$ rather than $M'' -aM' -bM$.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • Hmm, it seems unlikely to be a typo though? Putting in $a$ and $b$ seems deliberate.
            – Wyuw
            Aug 16 at 23:31






          • 2




            @Wyuw Why do you think it is deliberate? If it was, shouldn't $a$ and $b$ appear in the original substitution $u = Mw$ and also in the second line?
            – Mattos
            Aug 16 at 23:50











          • @Mattos Ahh you make a good point! Yes, I think you are correct.
            – Wyuw
            Aug 16 at 23:53










          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2885241%2fwhere-did-a-and-b-come-from-in-this-eigenvalue-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted










          Seems like a typo to me, since $u=Mw$ means $u''=M''w +2M'w' +Mw''$ rather than $M'' -aM' -bM$.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • Hmm, it seems unlikely to be a typo though? Putting in $a$ and $b$ seems deliberate.
            – Wyuw
            Aug 16 at 23:31






          • 2




            @Wyuw Why do you think it is deliberate? If it was, shouldn't $a$ and $b$ appear in the original substitution $u = Mw$ and also in the second line?
            – Mattos
            Aug 16 at 23:50











          • @Mattos Ahh you make a good point! Yes, I think you are correct.
            – Wyuw
            Aug 16 at 23:53














          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted










          Seems like a typo to me, since $u=Mw$ means $u''=M''w +2M'w' +Mw''$ rather than $M'' -aM' -bM$.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • Hmm, it seems unlikely to be a typo though? Putting in $a$ and $b$ seems deliberate.
            – Wyuw
            Aug 16 at 23:31






          • 2




            @Wyuw Why do you think it is deliberate? If it was, shouldn't $a$ and $b$ appear in the original substitution $u = Mw$ and also in the second line?
            – Mattos
            Aug 16 at 23:50











          • @Mattos Ahh you make a good point! Yes, I think you are correct.
            – Wyuw
            Aug 16 at 23:53












          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted






          Seems like a typo to me, since $u=Mw$ means $u''=M''w +2M'w' +Mw''$ rather than $M'' -aM' -bM$.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Seems like a typo to me, since $u=Mw$ means $u''=M''w +2M'w' +Mw''$ rather than $M'' -aM' -bM$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Aug 16 at 23:28









          Rócherz

          2,1962518




          2,1962518











          • Hmm, it seems unlikely to be a typo though? Putting in $a$ and $b$ seems deliberate.
            – Wyuw
            Aug 16 at 23:31






          • 2




            @Wyuw Why do you think it is deliberate? If it was, shouldn't $a$ and $b$ appear in the original substitution $u = Mw$ and also in the second line?
            – Mattos
            Aug 16 at 23:50











          • @Mattos Ahh you make a good point! Yes, I think you are correct.
            – Wyuw
            Aug 16 at 23:53
















          • Hmm, it seems unlikely to be a typo though? Putting in $a$ and $b$ seems deliberate.
            – Wyuw
            Aug 16 at 23:31






          • 2




            @Wyuw Why do you think it is deliberate? If it was, shouldn't $a$ and $b$ appear in the original substitution $u = Mw$ and also in the second line?
            – Mattos
            Aug 16 at 23:50











          • @Mattos Ahh you make a good point! Yes, I think you are correct.
            – Wyuw
            Aug 16 at 23:53















          Hmm, it seems unlikely to be a typo though? Putting in $a$ and $b$ seems deliberate.
          – Wyuw
          Aug 16 at 23:31




          Hmm, it seems unlikely to be a typo though? Putting in $a$ and $b$ seems deliberate.
          – Wyuw
          Aug 16 at 23:31




          2




          2




          @Wyuw Why do you think it is deliberate? If it was, shouldn't $a$ and $b$ appear in the original substitution $u = Mw$ and also in the second line?
          – Mattos
          Aug 16 at 23:50





          @Wyuw Why do you think it is deliberate? If it was, shouldn't $a$ and $b$ appear in the original substitution $u = Mw$ and also in the second line?
          – Mattos
          Aug 16 at 23:50













          @Mattos Ahh you make a good point! Yes, I think you are correct.
          – Wyuw
          Aug 16 at 23:53




          @Mattos Ahh you make a good point! Yes, I think you are correct.
          – Wyuw
          Aug 16 at 23:53












           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2885241%2fwhere-did-a-and-b-come-from-in-this-eigenvalue-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          tkz-euclide: tkzDrawCircle[R] not working

          How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

          1st Magritte Awards