a.s. convergence uniform distribution

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1












I am having troubles with proving almost surely convergence for the following problem:



Let $U_j$ be IID $U(0,1)$ distributed and define $A_n$ to be:



$A_n=sum_k=1^n prod_j=1^k U_j$ for $nin mathbbN$.



for $nrightarrow infty$, I want to prove that $A_n$ converges almost surely to some $A$.



I tried with LLN, but this did not give anything.







share|cite|improve this question






















  • I have edited the question making two small changes. I hope I didn't ruin anything.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Aug 17 at 7:21














up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1












I am having troubles with proving almost surely convergence for the following problem:



Let $U_j$ be IID $U(0,1)$ distributed and define $A_n$ to be:



$A_n=sum_k=1^n prod_j=1^k U_j$ for $nin mathbbN$.



for $nrightarrow infty$, I want to prove that $A_n$ converges almost surely to some $A$.



I tried with LLN, but this did not give anything.







share|cite|improve this question






















  • I have edited the question making two small changes. I hope I didn't ruin anything.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Aug 17 at 7:21












up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1






1





I am having troubles with proving almost surely convergence for the following problem:



Let $U_j$ be IID $U(0,1)$ distributed and define $A_n$ to be:



$A_n=sum_k=1^n prod_j=1^k U_j$ for $nin mathbbN$.



for $nrightarrow infty$, I want to prove that $A_n$ converges almost surely to some $A$.



I tried with LLN, but this did not give anything.







share|cite|improve this question














I am having troubles with proving almost surely convergence for the following problem:



Let $U_j$ be IID $U(0,1)$ distributed and define $A_n$ to be:



$A_n=sum_k=1^n prod_j=1^k U_j$ for $nin mathbbN$.



for $nrightarrow infty$, I want to prove that $A_n$ converges almost surely to some $A$.



I tried with LLN, but this did not give anything.









share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 17 at 8:15









saz

73.1k553113




73.1k553113










asked Aug 17 at 6:33









Jonathan Kiersch

699




699











  • I have edited the question making two small changes. I hope I didn't ruin anything.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Aug 17 at 7:21
















  • I have edited the question making two small changes. I hope I didn't ruin anything.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Aug 17 at 7:21















I have edited the question making two small changes. I hope I didn't ruin anything.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Aug 17 at 7:21




I have edited the question making two small changes. I hope I didn't ruin anything.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Aug 17 at 7:21










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
5
down vote



accepted










Note that $A_n$ is an increasing sequence of random variables, and therefore the pointwise limit equals $$A=sup_n in mathbbN A_n=lim_n to infty A_n.$$ In order to show that this limit is well-defined (in the sense $A<infty$ a.s.) we note that by the monotone convergence theorem



$$mathbbE left( sup_n in mathbbN A_n right) = sup_n in mathbbN mathbbE(A_n) = sup_n in mathbbN sum_k=1^n frac12^k < infty,$$



and so $A in L^1(mathbbP)$. This implies, in particular, $A<infty$ almost surely.






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • Everything makes sense, thank you! But what is the space L^1(P)? And is there a "general technique" to prove almost surely convergence, because I am often struggling with that. Or just some tips to consider?
    – Jonathan Kiersch
    Aug 17 at 7:51










  • @JonathanKiersch $A in L^1(mathbbP)$ means simply that $A$ has finite expectation, i.e. $mathbbE(|A|)<infty$. Re your 2nd question: Well, no, unfortunately there is no general technique. Often it helps to analyze the structure of the sequence; for instance if $A_n = sum_j=1^n Y_j$ then you can use different techniques depending whether the random variables $Y_j$ are independent and/or identically distributed. For independent random variables it's worth trying Kolmogorov's series theorem or Lévy's theorem ... if they are additionally identically distributed, then the strong law of
    – saz
    Aug 17 at 8:09










  • large numbers is a good idea. The most difficult case is that the random variables $(Y_j)$ are not independent or $(A_n)$ doesn't have this particular structure...then, for instance, sometimes the Borel-Cantelli lemma is useful. In the end, the only thing which helps is to keep solving such exercises... it certainly helps to get a better intuition.
    – saz
    Aug 17 at 8:12










  • I see, Thank you. Very helpful!
    – Jonathan Kiersch
    Aug 17 at 9:43










  • @JonathanKiersch You are welcome.
    – saz
    Aug 17 at 10:10










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2885460%2fa-s-convergence-uniform-distribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
5
down vote



accepted










Note that $A_n$ is an increasing sequence of random variables, and therefore the pointwise limit equals $$A=sup_n in mathbbN A_n=lim_n to infty A_n.$$ In order to show that this limit is well-defined (in the sense $A<infty$ a.s.) we note that by the monotone convergence theorem



$$mathbbE left( sup_n in mathbbN A_n right) = sup_n in mathbbN mathbbE(A_n) = sup_n in mathbbN sum_k=1^n frac12^k < infty,$$



and so $A in L^1(mathbbP)$. This implies, in particular, $A<infty$ almost surely.






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • Everything makes sense, thank you! But what is the space L^1(P)? And is there a "general technique" to prove almost surely convergence, because I am often struggling with that. Or just some tips to consider?
    – Jonathan Kiersch
    Aug 17 at 7:51










  • @JonathanKiersch $A in L^1(mathbbP)$ means simply that $A$ has finite expectation, i.e. $mathbbE(|A|)<infty$. Re your 2nd question: Well, no, unfortunately there is no general technique. Often it helps to analyze the structure of the sequence; for instance if $A_n = sum_j=1^n Y_j$ then you can use different techniques depending whether the random variables $Y_j$ are independent and/or identically distributed. For independent random variables it's worth trying Kolmogorov's series theorem or Lévy's theorem ... if they are additionally identically distributed, then the strong law of
    – saz
    Aug 17 at 8:09










  • large numbers is a good idea. The most difficult case is that the random variables $(Y_j)$ are not independent or $(A_n)$ doesn't have this particular structure...then, for instance, sometimes the Borel-Cantelli lemma is useful. In the end, the only thing which helps is to keep solving such exercises... it certainly helps to get a better intuition.
    – saz
    Aug 17 at 8:12










  • I see, Thank you. Very helpful!
    – Jonathan Kiersch
    Aug 17 at 9:43










  • @JonathanKiersch You are welcome.
    – saz
    Aug 17 at 10:10














up vote
5
down vote



accepted










Note that $A_n$ is an increasing sequence of random variables, and therefore the pointwise limit equals $$A=sup_n in mathbbN A_n=lim_n to infty A_n.$$ In order to show that this limit is well-defined (in the sense $A<infty$ a.s.) we note that by the monotone convergence theorem



$$mathbbE left( sup_n in mathbbN A_n right) = sup_n in mathbbN mathbbE(A_n) = sup_n in mathbbN sum_k=1^n frac12^k < infty,$$



and so $A in L^1(mathbbP)$. This implies, in particular, $A<infty$ almost surely.






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • Everything makes sense, thank you! But what is the space L^1(P)? And is there a "general technique" to prove almost surely convergence, because I am often struggling with that. Or just some tips to consider?
    – Jonathan Kiersch
    Aug 17 at 7:51










  • @JonathanKiersch $A in L^1(mathbbP)$ means simply that $A$ has finite expectation, i.e. $mathbbE(|A|)<infty$. Re your 2nd question: Well, no, unfortunately there is no general technique. Often it helps to analyze the structure of the sequence; for instance if $A_n = sum_j=1^n Y_j$ then you can use different techniques depending whether the random variables $Y_j$ are independent and/or identically distributed. For independent random variables it's worth trying Kolmogorov's series theorem or Lévy's theorem ... if they are additionally identically distributed, then the strong law of
    – saz
    Aug 17 at 8:09










  • large numbers is a good idea. The most difficult case is that the random variables $(Y_j)$ are not independent or $(A_n)$ doesn't have this particular structure...then, for instance, sometimes the Borel-Cantelli lemma is useful. In the end, the only thing which helps is to keep solving such exercises... it certainly helps to get a better intuition.
    – saz
    Aug 17 at 8:12










  • I see, Thank you. Very helpful!
    – Jonathan Kiersch
    Aug 17 at 9:43










  • @JonathanKiersch You are welcome.
    – saz
    Aug 17 at 10:10












up vote
5
down vote



accepted







up vote
5
down vote



accepted






Note that $A_n$ is an increasing sequence of random variables, and therefore the pointwise limit equals $$A=sup_n in mathbbN A_n=lim_n to infty A_n.$$ In order to show that this limit is well-defined (in the sense $A<infty$ a.s.) we note that by the monotone convergence theorem



$$mathbbE left( sup_n in mathbbN A_n right) = sup_n in mathbbN mathbbE(A_n) = sup_n in mathbbN sum_k=1^n frac12^k < infty,$$



and so $A in L^1(mathbbP)$. This implies, in particular, $A<infty$ almost surely.






share|cite|improve this answer














Note that $A_n$ is an increasing sequence of random variables, and therefore the pointwise limit equals $$A=sup_n in mathbbN A_n=lim_n to infty A_n.$$ In order to show that this limit is well-defined (in the sense $A<infty$ a.s.) we note that by the monotone convergence theorem



$$mathbbE left( sup_n in mathbbN A_n right) = sup_n in mathbbN mathbbE(A_n) = sup_n in mathbbN sum_k=1^n frac12^k < infty,$$



and so $A in L^1(mathbbP)$. This implies, in particular, $A<infty$ almost surely.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Aug 17 at 8:12

























answered Aug 17 at 6:57









saz

73.1k553113




73.1k553113











  • Everything makes sense, thank you! But what is the space L^1(P)? And is there a "general technique" to prove almost surely convergence, because I am often struggling with that. Or just some tips to consider?
    – Jonathan Kiersch
    Aug 17 at 7:51










  • @JonathanKiersch $A in L^1(mathbbP)$ means simply that $A$ has finite expectation, i.e. $mathbbE(|A|)<infty$. Re your 2nd question: Well, no, unfortunately there is no general technique. Often it helps to analyze the structure of the sequence; for instance if $A_n = sum_j=1^n Y_j$ then you can use different techniques depending whether the random variables $Y_j$ are independent and/or identically distributed. For independent random variables it's worth trying Kolmogorov's series theorem or Lévy's theorem ... if they are additionally identically distributed, then the strong law of
    – saz
    Aug 17 at 8:09










  • large numbers is a good idea. The most difficult case is that the random variables $(Y_j)$ are not independent or $(A_n)$ doesn't have this particular structure...then, for instance, sometimes the Borel-Cantelli lemma is useful. In the end, the only thing which helps is to keep solving such exercises... it certainly helps to get a better intuition.
    – saz
    Aug 17 at 8:12










  • I see, Thank you. Very helpful!
    – Jonathan Kiersch
    Aug 17 at 9:43










  • @JonathanKiersch You are welcome.
    – saz
    Aug 17 at 10:10
















  • Everything makes sense, thank you! But what is the space L^1(P)? And is there a "general technique" to prove almost surely convergence, because I am often struggling with that. Or just some tips to consider?
    – Jonathan Kiersch
    Aug 17 at 7:51










  • @JonathanKiersch $A in L^1(mathbbP)$ means simply that $A$ has finite expectation, i.e. $mathbbE(|A|)<infty$. Re your 2nd question: Well, no, unfortunately there is no general technique. Often it helps to analyze the structure of the sequence; for instance if $A_n = sum_j=1^n Y_j$ then you can use different techniques depending whether the random variables $Y_j$ are independent and/or identically distributed. For independent random variables it's worth trying Kolmogorov's series theorem or Lévy's theorem ... if they are additionally identically distributed, then the strong law of
    – saz
    Aug 17 at 8:09










  • large numbers is a good idea. The most difficult case is that the random variables $(Y_j)$ are not independent or $(A_n)$ doesn't have this particular structure...then, for instance, sometimes the Borel-Cantelli lemma is useful. In the end, the only thing which helps is to keep solving such exercises... it certainly helps to get a better intuition.
    – saz
    Aug 17 at 8:12










  • I see, Thank you. Very helpful!
    – Jonathan Kiersch
    Aug 17 at 9:43










  • @JonathanKiersch You are welcome.
    – saz
    Aug 17 at 10:10















Everything makes sense, thank you! But what is the space L^1(P)? And is there a "general technique" to prove almost surely convergence, because I am often struggling with that. Or just some tips to consider?
– Jonathan Kiersch
Aug 17 at 7:51




Everything makes sense, thank you! But what is the space L^1(P)? And is there a "general technique" to prove almost surely convergence, because I am often struggling with that. Or just some tips to consider?
– Jonathan Kiersch
Aug 17 at 7:51












@JonathanKiersch $A in L^1(mathbbP)$ means simply that $A$ has finite expectation, i.e. $mathbbE(|A|)<infty$. Re your 2nd question: Well, no, unfortunately there is no general technique. Often it helps to analyze the structure of the sequence; for instance if $A_n = sum_j=1^n Y_j$ then you can use different techniques depending whether the random variables $Y_j$ are independent and/or identically distributed. For independent random variables it's worth trying Kolmogorov's series theorem or Lévy's theorem ... if they are additionally identically distributed, then the strong law of
– saz
Aug 17 at 8:09




@JonathanKiersch $A in L^1(mathbbP)$ means simply that $A$ has finite expectation, i.e. $mathbbE(|A|)<infty$. Re your 2nd question: Well, no, unfortunately there is no general technique. Often it helps to analyze the structure of the sequence; for instance if $A_n = sum_j=1^n Y_j$ then you can use different techniques depending whether the random variables $Y_j$ are independent and/or identically distributed. For independent random variables it's worth trying Kolmogorov's series theorem or Lévy's theorem ... if they are additionally identically distributed, then the strong law of
– saz
Aug 17 at 8:09












large numbers is a good idea. The most difficult case is that the random variables $(Y_j)$ are not independent or $(A_n)$ doesn't have this particular structure...then, for instance, sometimes the Borel-Cantelli lemma is useful. In the end, the only thing which helps is to keep solving such exercises... it certainly helps to get a better intuition.
– saz
Aug 17 at 8:12




large numbers is a good idea. The most difficult case is that the random variables $(Y_j)$ are not independent or $(A_n)$ doesn't have this particular structure...then, for instance, sometimes the Borel-Cantelli lemma is useful. In the end, the only thing which helps is to keep solving such exercises... it certainly helps to get a better intuition.
– saz
Aug 17 at 8:12












I see, Thank you. Very helpful!
– Jonathan Kiersch
Aug 17 at 9:43




I see, Thank you. Very helpful!
– Jonathan Kiersch
Aug 17 at 9:43












@JonathanKiersch You are welcome.
– saz
Aug 17 at 10:10




@JonathanKiersch You are welcome.
– saz
Aug 17 at 10:10












 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2885460%2fa-s-convergence-uniform-distribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

Is there any way to eliminate the singular point to solve this integral by hand or by approximations?

Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

Carbon dioxide