Term for two differently named chords that contain the same notes

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
5
down vote

favorite












Is there a musical term for two different chords that contain the same notes?



E.g., Bdim7 is B D F A♭ and Ddim7 is D F A♭ B. They both have the same notes but their names are different.







share|improve this question


















  • 1




    For what it's worth, I personally find the adjective "enharmonically equivalent" much more common than any noun that relates these chords.
    – Richard
    Aug 17 at 15:05














up vote
5
down vote

favorite












Is there a musical term for two different chords that contain the same notes?



E.g., Bdim7 is B D F A♭ and Ddim7 is D F A♭ B. They both have the same notes but their names are different.







share|improve this question


















  • 1




    For what it's worth, I personally find the adjective "enharmonically equivalent" much more common than any noun that relates these chords.
    – Richard
    Aug 17 at 15:05












up vote
5
down vote

favorite









up vote
5
down vote

favorite











Is there a musical term for two different chords that contain the same notes?



E.g., Bdim7 is B D F A♭ and Ddim7 is D F A♭ B. They both have the same notes but their names are different.







share|improve this question














Is there a musical term for two different chords that contain the same notes?



E.g., Bdim7 is B D F A♭ and Ddim7 is D F A♭ B. They both have the same notes but their names are different.









share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Aug 17 at 15:03









Melebius

1033




1033










asked Aug 16 at 22:13









S. Imp

2279




2279







  • 1




    For what it's worth, I personally find the adjective "enharmonically equivalent" much more common than any noun that relates these chords.
    – Richard
    Aug 17 at 15:05












  • 1




    For what it's worth, I personally find the adjective "enharmonically equivalent" much more common than any noun that relates these chords.
    – Richard
    Aug 17 at 15:05







1




1




For what it's worth, I personally find the adjective "enharmonically equivalent" much more common than any noun that relates these chords.
– Richard
Aug 17 at 15:05




For what it's worth, I personally find the adjective "enharmonically equivalent" much more common than any noun that relates these chords.
– Richard
Aug 17 at 15:05










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
8
down vote



accepted










Typically, they are just considered named inversions.



Fully diminished chords and augmented triads like in your example have a very specific concepts tied to the symmetric nature that makes multiple names possible. These chords are known as symmetric chords because they are built using just one kind of interval. If you build a chord by going up in minor 3rds you get a fully diminished 7th and if you build a chord by going up in Major 3rds you get an Augmented triad.



These chords have been informally called enharmonic chords on the site, but that's not a formal term.






share|improve this answer






















  • That's one type of pitch set with multiple names. We also need to consider Am7/C6, Bm7b5/Dm6...
    – Laurence Payne
    Aug 17 at 0:32










  • @LaurencePayne That's why the first sentence makes the distinction on the broader category and the last sentence gives them an informal name.
    – Dom♦
    Aug 17 at 1:07










  • Not sure I would see C6 as an inversion of Am7. Yes, they contain the same notes/pitches, but they would be named as each, depending on their function, surely?
    – Tim
    Aug 17 at 6:43










  • Actually, I thought "enharmonic chords" was the correct term when the spelling of the chords is different, but I don't have a reference to back that up. It's a logical extension of enharmonic notes, of course.
    – user19146
    Aug 17 at 6:53






  • 1




    I would see C6 and Am7 as two different names for the same chord, not "two different chords". The only reason for the two names is the theory of harmony that we currently use. Back in the baroque era, when chords were named from the intervals they contained not from some assumption about their "roots", C6 and Am7 had the same name using figured bass notation , and neither composers nor performers had any problems with that! The first book that introduced the ideas of chord inversions etc was published in 1744, and at the time was widely considered "avant garde theory" not "mainstream".
    – user19146
    Aug 17 at 6:56


















up vote
9
down vote













There are only three fully diminished chords in regards to actual pitch. They can be spelled different ways according to the key. Your example for Ddim7 is actually spelled incorrectly. It should be D F Ab Cb. The Cb is what shows the quality of the dim7, not a B. That would just be a M6 above D.



Schoenberg called these chords vagrant chords as "such a chord belongs to no key exclusively; rather, it can belong to many, to practically all keys without changing its shape (not even inversion is necessary; it is just to assume relation to a root.) p.195 of his Theory of Harmony.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1




    Vagrant chords -- I haven't heard that before, but that is a nice term.
    – David Bowling
    Aug 17 at 3:19










  • @heather-s Actually, there are only 3 fully diminished chords. Also, I don't think I'll ever get used to things like Cb or Abb. Yucko!
    – S. Imp
    Aug 17 at 17:37






  • 1




    @S.Imp, yes, you are right about the three. I had gotten myself mixed up. I will edit my answer.
    – Heather S.
    Aug 17 at 18:17










Your Answer







StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "240"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f73795%2fterm-for-two-differently-named-chords-that-contain-the-same-notes%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
8
down vote



accepted










Typically, they are just considered named inversions.



Fully diminished chords and augmented triads like in your example have a very specific concepts tied to the symmetric nature that makes multiple names possible. These chords are known as symmetric chords because they are built using just one kind of interval. If you build a chord by going up in minor 3rds you get a fully diminished 7th and if you build a chord by going up in Major 3rds you get an Augmented triad.



These chords have been informally called enharmonic chords on the site, but that's not a formal term.






share|improve this answer






















  • That's one type of pitch set with multiple names. We also need to consider Am7/C6, Bm7b5/Dm6...
    – Laurence Payne
    Aug 17 at 0:32










  • @LaurencePayne That's why the first sentence makes the distinction on the broader category and the last sentence gives them an informal name.
    – Dom♦
    Aug 17 at 1:07










  • Not sure I would see C6 as an inversion of Am7. Yes, they contain the same notes/pitches, but they would be named as each, depending on their function, surely?
    – Tim
    Aug 17 at 6:43










  • Actually, I thought "enharmonic chords" was the correct term when the spelling of the chords is different, but I don't have a reference to back that up. It's a logical extension of enharmonic notes, of course.
    – user19146
    Aug 17 at 6:53






  • 1




    I would see C6 and Am7 as two different names for the same chord, not "two different chords". The only reason for the two names is the theory of harmony that we currently use. Back in the baroque era, when chords were named from the intervals they contained not from some assumption about their "roots", C6 and Am7 had the same name using figured bass notation , and neither composers nor performers had any problems with that! The first book that introduced the ideas of chord inversions etc was published in 1744, and at the time was widely considered "avant garde theory" not "mainstream".
    – user19146
    Aug 17 at 6:56















up vote
8
down vote



accepted










Typically, they are just considered named inversions.



Fully diminished chords and augmented triads like in your example have a very specific concepts tied to the symmetric nature that makes multiple names possible. These chords are known as symmetric chords because they are built using just one kind of interval. If you build a chord by going up in minor 3rds you get a fully diminished 7th and if you build a chord by going up in Major 3rds you get an Augmented triad.



These chords have been informally called enharmonic chords on the site, but that's not a formal term.






share|improve this answer






















  • That's one type of pitch set with multiple names. We also need to consider Am7/C6, Bm7b5/Dm6...
    – Laurence Payne
    Aug 17 at 0:32










  • @LaurencePayne That's why the first sentence makes the distinction on the broader category and the last sentence gives them an informal name.
    – Dom♦
    Aug 17 at 1:07










  • Not sure I would see C6 as an inversion of Am7. Yes, they contain the same notes/pitches, but they would be named as each, depending on their function, surely?
    – Tim
    Aug 17 at 6:43










  • Actually, I thought "enharmonic chords" was the correct term when the spelling of the chords is different, but I don't have a reference to back that up. It's a logical extension of enharmonic notes, of course.
    – user19146
    Aug 17 at 6:53






  • 1




    I would see C6 and Am7 as two different names for the same chord, not "two different chords". The only reason for the two names is the theory of harmony that we currently use. Back in the baroque era, when chords were named from the intervals they contained not from some assumption about their "roots", C6 and Am7 had the same name using figured bass notation , and neither composers nor performers had any problems with that! The first book that introduced the ideas of chord inversions etc was published in 1744, and at the time was widely considered "avant garde theory" not "mainstream".
    – user19146
    Aug 17 at 6:56













up vote
8
down vote



accepted







up vote
8
down vote



accepted






Typically, they are just considered named inversions.



Fully diminished chords and augmented triads like in your example have a very specific concepts tied to the symmetric nature that makes multiple names possible. These chords are known as symmetric chords because they are built using just one kind of interval. If you build a chord by going up in minor 3rds you get a fully diminished 7th and if you build a chord by going up in Major 3rds you get an Augmented triad.



These chords have been informally called enharmonic chords on the site, but that's not a formal term.






share|improve this answer














Typically, they are just considered named inversions.



Fully diminished chords and augmented triads like in your example have a very specific concepts tied to the symmetric nature that makes multiple names possible. These chords are known as symmetric chords because they are built using just one kind of interval. If you build a chord by going up in minor 3rds you get a fully diminished 7th and if you build a chord by going up in Major 3rds you get an Augmented triad.



These chords have been informally called enharmonic chords on the site, but that's not a formal term.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Aug 17 at 6:40









Tim

87.9k1089225




87.9k1089225










answered Aug 16 at 22:50









Dom♦

34.4k1797212




34.4k1797212











  • That's one type of pitch set with multiple names. We also need to consider Am7/C6, Bm7b5/Dm6...
    – Laurence Payne
    Aug 17 at 0:32










  • @LaurencePayne That's why the first sentence makes the distinction on the broader category and the last sentence gives them an informal name.
    – Dom♦
    Aug 17 at 1:07










  • Not sure I would see C6 as an inversion of Am7. Yes, they contain the same notes/pitches, but they would be named as each, depending on their function, surely?
    – Tim
    Aug 17 at 6:43










  • Actually, I thought "enharmonic chords" was the correct term when the spelling of the chords is different, but I don't have a reference to back that up. It's a logical extension of enharmonic notes, of course.
    – user19146
    Aug 17 at 6:53






  • 1




    I would see C6 and Am7 as two different names for the same chord, not "two different chords". The only reason for the two names is the theory of harmony that we currently use. Back in the baroque era, when chords were named from the intervals they contained not from some assumption about their "roots", C6 and Am7 had the same name using figured bass notation , and neither composers nor performers had any problems with that! The first book that introduced the ideas of chord inversions etc was published in 1744, and at the time was widely considered "avant garde theory" not "mainstream".
    – user19146
    Aug 17 at 6:56

















  • That's one type of pitch set with multiple names. We also need to consider Am7/C6, Bm7b5/Dm6...
    – Laurence Payne
    Aug 17 at 0:32










  • @LaurencePayne That's why the first sentence makes the distinction on the broader category and the last sentence gives them an informal name.
    – Dom♦
    Aug 17 at 1:07










  • Not sure I would see C6 as an inversion of Am7. Yes, they contain the same notes/pitches, but they would be named as each, depending on their function, surely?
    – Tim
    Aug 17 at 6:43










  • Actually, I thought "enharmonic chords" was the correct term when the spelling of the chords is different, but I don't have a reference to back that up. It's a logical extension of enharmonic notes, of course.
    – user19146
    Aug 17 at 6:53






  • 1




    I would see C6 and Am7 as two different names for the same chord, not "two different chords". The only reason for the two names is the theory of harmony that we currently use. Back in the baroque era, when chords were named from the intervals they contained not from some assumption about their "roots", C6 and Am7 had the same name using figured bass notation , and neither composers nor performers had any problems with that! The first book that introduced the ideas of chord inversions etc was published in 1744, and at the time was widely considered "avant garde theory" not "mainstream".
    – user19146
    Aug 17 at 6:56
















That's one type of pitch set with multiple names. We also need to consider Am7/C6, Bm7b5/Dm6...
– Laurence Payne
Aug 17 at 0:32




That's one type of pitch set with multiple names. We also need to consider Am7/C6, Bm7b5/Dm6...
– Laurence Payne
Aug 17 at 0:32












@LaurencePayne That's why the first sentence makes the distinction on the broader category and the last sentence gives them an informal name.
– Dom♦
Aug 17 at 1:07




@LaurencePayne That's why the first sentence makes the distinction on the broader category and the last sentence gives them an informal name.
– Dom♦
Aug 17 at 1:07












Not sure I would see C6 as an inversion of Am7. Yes, they contain the same notes/pitches, but they would be named as each, depending on their function, surely?
– Tim
Aug 17 at 6:43




Not sure I would see C6 as an inversion of Am7. Yes, they contain the same notes/pitches, but they would be named as each, depending on their function, surely?
– Tim
Aug 17 at 6:43












Actually, I thought "enharmonic chords" was the correct term when the spelling of the chords is different, but I don't have a reference to back that up. It's a logical extension of enharmonic notes, of course.
– user19146
Aug 17 at 6:53




Actually, I thought "enharmonic chords" was the correct term when the spelling of the chords is different, but I don't have a reference to back that up. It's a logical extension of enharmonic notes, of course.
– user19146
Aug 17 at 6:53




1




1




I would see C6 and Am7 as two different names for the same chord, not "two different chords". The only reason for the two names is the theory of harmony that we currently use. Back in the baroque era, when chords were named from the intervals they contained not from some assumption about their "roots", C6 and Am7 had the same name using figured bass notation , and neither composers nor performers had any problems with that! The first book that introduced the ideas of chord inversions etc was published in 1744, and at the time was widely considered "avant garde theory" not "mainstream".
– user19146
Aug 17 at 6:56





I would see C6 and Am7 as two different names for the same chord, not "two different chords". The only reason for the two names is the theory of harmony that we currently use. Back in the baroque era, when chords were named from the intervals they contained not from some assumption about their "roots", C6 and Am7 had the same name using figured bass notation , and neither composers nor performers had any problems with that! The first book that introduced the ideas of chord inversions etc was published in 1744, and at the time was widely considered "avant garde theory" not "mainstream".
– user19146
Aug 17 at 6:56











up vote
9
down vote













There are only three fully diminished chords in regards to actual pitch. They can be spelled different ways according to the key. Your example for Ddim7 is actually spelled incorrectly. It should be D F Ab Cb. The Cb is what shows the quality of the dim7, not a B. That would just be a M6 above D.



Schoenberg called these chords vagrant chords as "such a chord belongs to no key exclusively; rather, it can belong to many, to practically all keys without changing its shape (not even inversion is necessary; it is just to assume relation to a root.) p.195 of his Theory of Harmony.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1




    Vagrant chords -- I haven't heard that before, but that is a nice term.
    – David Bowling
    Aug 17 at 3:19










  • @heather-s Actually, there are only 3 fully diminished chords. Also, I don't think I'll ever get used to things like Cb or Abb. Yucko!
    – S. Imp
    Aug 17 at 17:37






  • 1




    @S.Imp, yes, you are right about the three. I had gotten myself mixed up. I will edit my answer.
    – Heather S.
    Aug 17 at 18:17














up vote
9
down vote













There are only three fully diminished chords in regards to actual pitch. They can be spelled different ways according to the key. Your example for Ddim7 is actually spelled incorrectly. It should be D F Ab Cb. The Cb is what shows the quality of the dim7, not a B. That would just be a M6 above D.



Schoenberg called these chords vagrant chords as "such a chord belongs to no key exclusively; rather, it can belong to many, to practically all keys without changing its shape (not even inversion is necessary; it is just to assume relation to a root.) p.195 of his Theory of Harmony.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1




    Vagrant chords -- I haven't heard that before, but that is a nice term.
    – David Bowling
    Aug 17 at 3:19










  • @heather-s Actually, there are only 3 fully diminished chords. Also, I don't think I'll ever get used to things like Cb or Abb. Yucko!
    – S. Imp
    Aug 17 at 17:37






  • 1




    @S.Imp, yes, you are right about the three. I had gotten myself mixed up. I will edit my answer.
    – Heather S.
    Aug 17 at 18:17












up vote
9
down vote










up vote
9
down vote









There are only three fully diminished chords in regards to actual pitch. They can be spelled different ways according to the key. Your example for Ddim7 is actually spelled incorrectly. It should be D F Ab Cb. The Cb is what shows the quality of the dim7, not a B. That would just be a M6 above D.



Schoenberg called these chords vagrant chords as "such a chord belongs to no key exclusively; rather, it can belong to many, to practically all keys without changing its shape (not even inversion is necessary; it is just to assume relation to a root.) p.195 of his Theory of Harmony.






share|improve this answer














There are only three fully diminished chords in regards to actual pitch. They can be spelled different ways according to the key. Your example for Ddim7 is actually spelled incorrectly. It should be D F Ab Cb. The Cb is what shows the quality of the dim7, not a B. That would just be a M6 above D.



Schoenberg called these chords vagrant chords as "such a chord belongs to no key exclusively; rather, it can belong to many, to practically all keys without changing its shape (not even inversion is necessary; it is just to assume relation to a root.) p.195 of his Theory of Harmony.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Aug 17 at 18:17

























answered Aug 17 at 2:44









Heather S.

2,077215




2,077215







  • 1




    Vagrant chords -- I haven't heard that before, but that is a nice term.
    – David Bowling
    Aug 17 at 3:19










  • @heather-s Actually, there are only 3 fully diminished chords. Also, I don't think I'll ever get used to things like Cb or Abb. Yucko!
    – S. Imp
    Aug 17 at 17:37






  • 1




    @S.Imp, yes, you are right about the three. I had gotten myself mixed up. I will edit my answer.
    – Heather S.
    Aug 17 at 18:17












  • 1




    Vagrant chords -- I haven't heard that before, but that is a nice term.
    – David Bowling
    Aug 17 at 3:19










  • @heather-s Actually, there are only 3 fully diminished chords. Also, I don't think I'll ever get used to things like Cb or Abb. Yucko!
    – S. Imp
    Aug 17 at 17:37






  • 1




    @S.Imp, yes, you are right about the three. I had gotten myself mixed up. I will edit my answer.
    – Heather S.
    Aug 17 at 18:17







1




1




Vagrant chords -- I haven't heard that before, but that is a nice term.
– David Bowling
Aug 17 at 3:19




Vagrant chords -- I haven't heard that before, but that is a nice term.
– David Bowling
Aug 17 at 3:19












@heather-s Actually, there are only 3 fully diminished chords. Also, I don't think I'll ever get used to things like Cb or Abb. Yucko!
– S. Imp
Aug 17 at 17:37




@heather-s Actually, there are only 3 fully diminished chords. Also, I don't think I'll ever get used to things like Cb or Abb. Yucko!
– S. Imp
Aug 17 at 17:37




1




1




@S.Imp, yes, you are right about the three. I had gotten myself mixed up. I will edit my answer.
– Heather S.
Aug 17 at 18:17




@S.Imp, yes, you are right about the three. I had gotten myself mixed up. I will edit my answer.
– Heather S.
Aug 17 at 18:17












 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f73795%2fterm-for-two-differently-named-chords-that-contain-the-same-notes%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

Is there any way to eliminate the singular point to solve this integral by hand or by approximations?

Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

Carbon dioxide