Taking square roots modulo $2^N$

Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
I was trying to solve $y^2 - y equiv 16 pmod512$ by completing the square.
Here is my solution.
beginalign
y^2 - y &equiv 16 pmod512 \
4y^2 - 4y + 1 &equiv 65 pmod512 \
(2y-1)^2 &equiv 65 pmod512 \
2y - 1 &equiv pm 33 pmod512 &textFound by pointwise search.\
2y &equiv 34, -32 pmod512 \
y &equiv 17, -16 pmod256 \
y &in 17, 273, 240, 496 pmod512 &textThese values need to be verified.\
y &in 240, 273pmod512
endalign
I had to solve $x^2 equiv 65 pmod2^9$ by a pointwise search. Is there any systematic method for solving equivalences of the form $x^2 equiv a pmod2^N$, or more generally $x^2 equiv a pmodp^N$ for a prime number $p$.
elementary-number-theory
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
I was trying to solve $y^2 - y equiv 16 pmod512$ by completing the square.
Here is my solution.
beginalign
y^2 - y &equiv 16 pmod512 \
4y^2 - 4y + 1 &equiv 65 pmod512 \
(2y-1)^2 &equiv 65 pmod512 \
2y - 1 &equiv pm 33 pmod512 &textFound by pointwise search.\
2y &equiv 34, -32 pmod512 \
y &equiv 17, -16 pmod256 \
y &in 17, 273, 240, 496 pmod512 &textThese values need to be verified.\
y &in 240, 273pmod512
endalign
I had to solve $x^2 equiv 65 pmod2^9$ by a pointwise search. Is there any systematic method for solving equivalences of the form $x^2 equiv a pmod2^N$, or more generally $x^2 equiv a pmodp^N$ for a prime number $p$.
elementary-number-theory
1
This seems to be related numbertheory.org/php/squareroot.html
â nigel
Aug 16 at 23:09
1
The original equation is actually easier to solve if you use a computation based on the proof of Hensel's lemma. (That's because $y^2 - y$ has a nonzero derivative $pmod2$ but $z^2$ doesn't.)
â Daniel Schepler
Aug 17 at 0:12
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
I was trying to solve $y^2 - y equiv 16 pmod512$ by completing the square.
Here is my solution.
beginalign
y^2 - y &equiv 16 pmod512 \
4y^2 - 4y + 1 &equiv 65 pmod512 \
(2y-1)^2 &equiv 65 pmod512 \
2y - 1 &equiv pm 33 pmod512 &textFound by pointwise search.\
2y &equiv 34, -32 pmod512 \
y &equiv 17, -16 pmod256 \
y &in 17, 273, 240, 496 pmod512 &textThese values need to be verified.\
y &in 240, 273pmod512
endalign
I had to solve $x^2 equiv 65 pmod2^9$ by a pointwise search. Is there any systematic method for solving equivalences of the form $x^2 equiv a pmod2^N$, or more generally $x^2 equiv a pmodp^N$ for a prime number $p$.
elementary-number-theory
I was trying to solve $y^2 - y equiv 16 pmod512$ by completing the square.
Here is my solution.
beginalign
y^2 - y &equiv 16 pmod512 \
4y^2 - 4y + 1 &equiv 65 pmod512 \
(2y-1)^2 &equiv 65 pmod512 \
2y - 1 &equiv pm 33 pmod512 &textFound by pointwise search.\
2y &equiv 34, -32 pmod512 \
y &equiv 17, -16 pmod256 \
y &in 17, 273, 240, 496 pmod512 &textThese values need to be verified.\
y &in 240, 273pmod512
endalign
I had to solve $x^2 equiv 65 pmod2^9$ by a pointwise search. Is there any systematic method for solving equivalences of the form $x^2 equiv a pmod2^N$, or more generally $x^2 equiv a pmodp^N$ for a prime number $p$.
elementary-number-theory
edited Aug 17 at 0:45
asked Aug 16 at 22:57
steven gregory
16.6k22055
16.6k22055
1
This seems to be related numbertheory.org/php/squareroot.html
â nigel
Aug 16 at 23:09
1
The original equation is actually easier to solve if you use a computation based on the proof of Hensel's lemma. (That's because $y^2 - y$ has a nonzero derivative $pmod2$ but $z^2$ doesn't.)
â Daniel Schepler
Aug 17 at 0:12
add a comment |Â
1
This seems to be related numbertheory.org/php/squareroot.html
â nigel
Aug 16 at 23:09
1
The original equation is actually easier to solve if you use a computation based on the proof of Hensel's lemma. (That's because $y^2 - y$ has a nonzero derivative $pmod2$ but $z^2$ doesn't.)
â Daniel Schepler
Aug 17 at 0:12
1
1
This seems to be related numbertheory.org/php/squareroot.html
â nigel
Aug 16 at 23:09
This seems to be related numbertheory.org/php/squareroot.html
â nigel
Aug 16 at 23:09
1
1
The original equation is actually easier to solve if you use a computation based on the proof of Hensel's lemma. (That's because $y^2 - y$ has a nonzero derivative $pmod2$ but $z^2$ doesn't.)
â Daniel Schepler
Aug 17 at 0:12
The original equation is actually easier to solve if you use a computation based on the proof of Hensel's lemma. (That's because $y^2 - y$ has a nonzero derivative $pmod2$ but $z^2$ doesn't.)
â Daniel Schepler
Aug 17 at 0:12
add a comment |Â
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
Can you solve it in $p$-adics?
For any $2$-adic integer $n$ we have the familiar Taylor/binomial-power series for $sqrt1+8n$:
$sqrt1+8n=1+(1/2)(8n)-...$
All omitted terms vanish $bmod 512$ When $n$ is a multiple of $8$, thus with $n=8$
$sqrt65equiv 1+(1/2)(8ÃÂ8) bmod 512$
$sqrt65equiv 1+32equiv 33 bmod 512$
So one square root (the root closer to $1$ in $2$-adics) is $33 bmod 512$.
For reference here are more terms in the binomial expansion used above:
$sqrt1+8n=1+(2^2)n-(2^3)n^2+(2^5)n^3-(5ÃÂ2^5)n^4+(7ÃÂ2^7)n^5-(21ÃÂ2^8)n^6+(33ÃÂ2^10)n^7-(429ÃÂ2^9)n^8+...$
Thus is sufficiently many terms to obtain at least eleven bits in the square root ($bmod 2048$) for any integer $n$ (not just multiples of 8 as above); the exponent on $2$ is at least $11$ in all subsequent terms. The exponent on $2$ is always at least the number of terms rendered (e.g. $2^9$ in the ninth term), thus guaranteeing convergence in $2$-adics. Note also that for a conventional integer square the obtained square root is one greater than a multiple of $4$, which in conventional algebra could be the negative root (e.g. $sqrt9=-3$).
1
This is a great answer. I love p-adic number theory but I am very rusty at it. It seems that I should reintroduce myself to it.
â steven gregory
Aug 17 at 0:53
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
A basic refinement would be to use the fact that if $x^2equiv y pmodp^N$, then for every $N'<N$ we also have $x^2equiv ypmodp^N'$. You might as well assume $y$ is coprime to $p$, since otherwise you can easily pull out its factors of $p$.
You can then proceed as follows: Find every solution $x$ to this mod $p$. Then, each of these solutions could lift to $p$ things mod $p^2$ - so you can find the solutions mod $p^2$ checking those. Then you can lift again to $p^3$ and so on - and, since there will be at most four* square roots mod $p^N$ (and only two if $p$ is odd). Thus, you'll only have to check about $4pN$ values for this method to work - a lot better than checking $p^N$ values - but wait, we can do even better!
Note that the actual lifting step can be further simplified: If we know that $x^2equiv ypmodp^N$, then we can try looking for some $z=x+p^Nc$ such that $z^2equiv ypmodp^N+1$. Working this out gives $x^2+2p^Ncequiv ypmodp^N+1$, which is easy to solve for $c$ (or, if $p=2$, we find that $c$ doesn't even matter - half of our previous square roots lift to two new square roots, and the other half don't lift at all!). Doing this, once you figure out the square root mod $p$, it's basically clean sailing from there.
As for actually solving $x^2equiv ypmodp$, there are some ways - for instance, if $p=4k+3$, you can find one using Fermat's little theorem, but it seems you're interesting in small primes (e.g. $2$) where it's not hard to check every possible $x$.
(*I also should explicitly point out that, for $kgeq 3$, there are four solutions to $x^2=1pmod2^k$ - and consequently, any number with a square root actually has four square roots - the ones you missed for $65$ mod $512$ were $pm 223$, which can be found by adding $256$ to your existing roots, since adding $256$ doesn't change the square mod $512$.)
Thanks for pointing out the error. Just by dumb luck, my solution reinserted the $pm 223$ when I reduced the congruence to $mod256$.
â steven gregory
Aug 17 at 0:50
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
This isn't a general method, but here's a neat trick if $2^k|a-1$ for some large enough $k$.
Claim. If $x^2equiv abmod 2^n$ and $aequiv 1bmod 2^k$, with $nleq 2k$, then
$$xequiv pm fraca+12bmod 2^n-1.$$
Proof. As there are only two residue classes $bmod 2^n-1$ that will satisfy this, it suffices to show that these both do. Setting $b=(a+1)/2$ we need to show that
$$b^2equiv a=2b-1bmod 2^n.$$
Indeed, this is equivalent to
$$2^n|(b-1)^2 Leftrightarrow bequiv 1bmod 2^leftlceilfracn2rightrceil,$$
which is itself equivalent to
$$aequiv 1bmod 2^leftlceilfracn2rightrceil,$$
which is true as $leftlceilfracn2rightrceil leq k$.
So, since we have $x^2equiv abmod 2^9$ and $aequiv 1bmod 2^6$, we have that $xequiv pm fraca+12 = pm 33bmod 2^8.$
A similar result holds in general:
If $p$ is an odd prime with $x^2equiv abmod p^n$ and $aequiv 1bmod 2^k$ with $nleq 2k$, then
$$xequiv pm fraca+12bmod p^n.$$
This can be proven in nearly identical fashion.
add a comment |Â
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
Can you solve it in $p$-adics?
For any $2$-adic integer $n$ we have the familiar Taylor/binomial-power series for $sqrt1+8n$:
$sqrt1+8n=1+(1/2)(8n)-...$
All omitted terms vanish $bmod 512$ When $n$ is a multiple of $8$, thus with $n=8$
$sqrt65equiv 1+(1/2)(8ÃÂ8) bmod 512$
$sqrt65equiv 1+32equiv 33 bmod 512$
So one square root (the root closer to $1$ in $2$-adics) is $33 bmod 512$.
For reference here are more terms in the binomial expansion used above:
$sqrt1+8n=1+(2^2)n-(2^3)n^2+(2^5)n^3-(5ÃÂ2^5)n^4+(7ÃÂ2^7)n^5-(21ÃÂ2^8)n^6+(33ÃÂ2^10)n^7-(429ÃÂ2^9)n^8+...$
Thus is sufficiently many terms to obtain at least eleven bits in the square root ($bmod 2048$) for any integer $n$ (not just multiples of 8 as above); the exponent on $2$ is at least $11$ in all subsequent terms. The exponent on $2$ is always at least the number of terms rendered (e.g. $2^9$ in the ninth term), thus guaranteeing convergence in $2$-adics. Note also that for a conventional integer square the obtained square root is one greater than a multiple of $4$, which in conventional algebra could be the negative root (e.g. $sqrt9=-3$).
1
This is a great answer. I love p-adic number theory but I am very rusty at it. It seems that I should reintroduce myself to it.
â steven gregory
Aug 17 at 0:53
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
Can you solve it in $p$-adics?
For any $2$-adic integer $n$ we have the familiar Taylor/binomial-power series for $sqrt1+8n$:
$sqrt1+8n=1+(1/2)(8n)-...$
All omitted terms vanish $bmod 512$ When $n$ is a multiple of $8$, thus with $n=8$
$sqrt65equiv 1+(1/2)(8ÃÂ8) bmod 512$
$sqrt65equiv 1+32equiv 33 bmod 512$
So one square root (the root closer to $1$ in $2$-adics) is $33 bmod 512$.
For reference here are more terms in the binomial expansion used above:
$sqrt1+8n=1+(2^2)n-(2^3)n^2+(2^5)n^3-(5ÃÂ2^5)n^4+(7ÃÂ2^7)n^5-(21ÃÂ2^8)n^6+(33ÃÂ2^10)n^7-(429ÃÂ2^9)n^8+...$
Thus is sufficiently many terms to obtain at least eleven bits in the square root ($bmod 2048$) for any integer $n$ (not just multiples of 8 as above); the exponent on $2$ is at least $11$ in all subsequent terms. The exponent on $2$ is always at least the number of terms rendered (e.g. $2^9$ in the ninth term), thus guaranteeing convergence in $2$-adics. Note also that for a conventional integer square the obtained square root is one greater than a multiple of $4$, which in conventional algebra could be the negative root (e.g. $sqrt9=-3$).
1
This is a great answer. I love p-adic number theory but I am very rusty at it. It seems that I should reintroduce myself to it.
â steven gregory
Aug 17 at 0:53
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
Can you solve it in $p$-adics?
For any $2$-adic integer $n$ we have the familiar Taylor/binomial-power series for $sqrt1+8n$:
$sqrt1+8n=1+(1/2)(8n)-...$
All omitted terms vanish $bmod 512$ When $n$ is a multiple of $8$, thus with $n=8$
$sqrt65equiv 1+(1/2)(8ÃÂ8) bmod 512$
$sqrt65equiv 1+32equiv 33 bmod 512$
So one square root (the root closer to $1$ in $2$-adics) is $33 bmod 512$.
For reference here are more terms in the binomial expansion used above:
$sqrt1+8n=1+(2^2)n-(2^3)n^2+(2^5)n^3-(5ÃÂ2^5)n^4+(7ÃÂ2^7)n^5-(21ÃÂ2^8)n^6+(33ÃÂ2^10)n^7-(429ÃÂ2^9)n^8+...$
Thus is sufficiently many terms to obtain at least eleven bits in the square root ($bmod 2048$) for any integer $n$ (not just multiples of 8 as above); the exponent on $2$ is at least $11$ in all subsequent terms. The exponent on $2$ is always at least the number of terms rendered (e.g. $2^9$ in the ninth term), thus guaranteeing convergence in $2$-adics. Note also that for a conventional integer square the obtained square root is one greater than a multiple of $4$, which in conventional algebra could be the negative root (e.g. $sqrt9=-3$).
Can you solve it in $p$-adics?
For any $2$-adic integer $n$ we have the familiar Taylor/binomial-power series for $sqrt1+8n$:
$sqrt1+8n=1+(1/2)(8n)-...$
All omitted terms vanish $bmod 512$ When $n$ is a multiple of $8$, thus with $n=8$
$sqrt65equiv 1+(1/2)(8ÃÂ8) bmod 512$
$sqrt65equiv 1+32equiv 33 bmod 512$
So one square root (the root closer to $1$ in $2$-adics) is $33 bmod 512$.
For reference here are more terms in the binomial expansion used above:
$sqrt1+8n=1+(2^2)n-(2^3)n^2+(2^5)n^3-(5ÃÂ2^5)n^4+(7ÃÂ2^7)n^5-(21ÃÂ2^8)n^6+(33ÃÂ2^10)n^7-(429ÃÂ2^9)n^8+...$
Thus is sufficiently many terms to obtain at least eleven bits in the square root ($bmod 2048$) for any integer $n$ (not just multiples of 8 as above); the exponent on $2$ is at least $11$ in all subsequent terms. The exponent on $2$ is always at least the number of terms rendered (e.g. $2^9$ in the ninth term), thus guaranteeing convergence in $2$-adics. Note also that for a conventional integer square the obtained square root is one greater than a multiple of $4$, which in conventional algebra could be the negative root (e.g. $sqrt9=-3$).
edited Aug 17 at 14:02
answered Aug 17 at 0:31
Oscar Lanzi
10.1k11632
10.1k11632
1
This is a great answer. I love p-adic number theory but I am very rusty at it. It seems that I should reintroduce myself to it.
â steven gregory
Aug 17 at 0:53
add a comment |Â
1
This is a great answer. I love p-adic number theory but I am very rusty at it. It seems that I should reintroduce myself to it.
â steven gregory
Aug 17 at 0:53
1
1
This is a great answer. I love p-adic number theory but I am very rusty at it. It seems that I should reintroduce myself to it.
â steven gregory
Aug 17 at 0:53
This is a great answer. I love p-adic number theory but I am very rusty at it. It seems that I should reintroduce myself to it.
â steven gregory
Aug 17 at 0:53
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
A basic refinement would be to use the fact that if $x^2equiv y pmodp^N$, then for every $N'<N$ we also have $x^2equiv ypmodp^N'$. You might as well assume $y$ is coprime to $p$, since otherwise you can easily pull out its factors of $p$.
You can then proceed as follows: Find every solution $x$ to this mod $p$. Then, each of these solutions could lift to $p$ things mod $p^2$ - so you can find the solutions mod $p^2$ checking those. Then you can lift again to $p^3$ and so on - and, since there will be at most four* square roots mod $p^N$ (and only two if $p$ is odd). Thus, you'll only have to check about $4pN$ values for this method to work - a lot better than checking $p^N$ values - but wait, we can do even better!
Note that the actual lifting step can be further simplified: If we know that $x^2equiv ypmodp^N$, then we can try looking for some $z=x+p^Nc$ such that $z^2equiv ypmodp^N+1$. Working this out gives $x^2+2p^Ncequiv ypmodp^N+1$, which is easy to solve for $c$ (or, if $p=2$, we find that $c$ doesn't even matter - half of our previous square roots lift to two new square roots, and the other half don't lift at all!). Doing this, once you figure out the square root mod $p$, it's basically clean sailing from there.
As for actually solving $x^2equiv ypmodp$, there are some ways - for instance, if $p=4k+3$, you can find one using Fermat's little theorem, but it seems you're interesting in small primes (e.g. $2$) where it's not hard to check every possible $x$.
(*I also should explicitly point out that, for $kgeq 3$, there are four solutions to $x^2=1pmod2^k$ - and consequently, any number with a square root actually has four square roots - the ones you missed for $65$ mod $512$ were $pm 223$, which can be found by adding $256$ to your existing roots, since adding $256$ doesn't change the square mod $512$.)
Thanks for pointing out the error. Just by dumb luck, my solution reinserted the $pm 223$ when I reduced the congruence to $mod256$.
â steven gregory
Aug 17 at 0:50
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
A basic refinement would be to use the fact that if $x^2equiv y pmodp^N$, then for every $N'<N$ we also have $x^2equiv ypmodp^N'$. You might as well assume $y$ is coprime to $p$, since otherwise you can easily pull out its factors of $p$.
You can then proceed as follows: Find every solution $x$ to this mod $p$. Then, each of these solutions could lift to $p$ things mod $p^2$ - so you can find the solutions mod $p^2$ checking those. Then you can lift again to $p^3$ and so on - and, since there will be at most four* square roots mod $p^N$ (and only two if $p$ is odd). Thus, you'll only have to check about $4pN$ values for this method to work - a lot better than checking $p^N$ values - but wait, we can do even better!
Note that the actual lifting step can be further simplified: If we know that $x^2equiv ypmodp^N$, then we can try looking for some $z=x+p^Nc$ such that $z^2equiv ypmodp^N+1$. Working this out gives $x^2+2p^Ncequiv ypmodp^N+1$, which is easy to solve for $c$ (or, if $p=2$, we find that $c$ doesn't even matter - half of our previous square roots lift to two new square roots, and the other half don't lift at all!). Doing this, once you figure out the square root mod $p$, it's basically clean sailing from there.
As for actually solving $x^2equiv ypmodp$, there are some ways - for instance, if $p=4k+3$, you can find one using Fermat's little theorem, but it seems you're interesting in small primes (e.g. $2$) where it's not hard to check every possible $x$.
(*I also should explicitly point out that, for $kgeq 3$, there are four solutions to $x^2=1pmod2^k$ - and consequently, any number with a square root actually has four square roots - the ones you missed for $65$ mod $512$ were $pm 223$, which can be found by adding $256$ to your existing roots, since adding $256$ doesn't change the square mod $512$.)
Thanks for pointing out the error. Just by dumb luck, my solution reinserted the $pm 223$ when I reduced the congruence to $mod256$.
â steven gregory
Aug 17 at 0:50
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
A basic refinement would be to use the fact that if $x^2equiv y pmodp^N$, then for every $N'<N$ we also have $x^2equiv ypmodp^N'$. You might as well assume $y$ is coprime to $p$, since otherwise you can easily pull out its factors of $p$.
You can then proceed as follows: Find every solution $x$ to this mod $p$. Then, each of these solutions could lift to $p$ things mod $p^2$ - so you can find the solutions mod $p^2$ checking those. Then you can lift again to $p^3$ and so on - and, since there will be at most four* square roots mod $p^N$ (and only two if $p$ is odd). Thus, you'll only have to check about $4pN$ values for this method to work - a lot better than checking $p^N$ values - but wait, we can do even better!
Note that the actual lifting step can be further simplified: If we know that $x^2equiv ypmodp^N$, then we can try looking for some $z=x+p^Nc$ such that $z^2equiv ypmodp^N+1$. Working this out gives $x^2+2p^Ncequiv ypmodp^N+1$, which is easy to solve for $c$ (or, if $p=2$, we find that $c$ doesn't even matter - half of our previous square roots lift to two new square roots, and the other half don't lift at all!). Doing this, once you figure out the square root mod $p$, it's basically clean sailing from there.
As for actually solving $x^2equiv ypmodp$, there are some ways - for instance, if $p=4k+3$, you can find one using Fermat's little theorem, but it seems you're interesting in small primes (e.g. $2$) where it's not hard to check every possible $x$.
(*I also should explicitly point out that, for $kgeq 3$, there are four solutions to $x^2=1pmod2^k$ - and consequently, any number with a square root actually has four square roots - the ones you missed for $65$ mod $512$ were $pm 223$, which can be found by adding $256$ to your existing roots, since adding $256$ doesn't change the square mod $512$.)
A basic refinement would be to use the fact that if $x^2equiv y pmodp^N$, then for every $N'<N$ we also have $x^2equiv ypmodp^N'$. You might as well assume $y$ is coprime to $p$, since otherwise you can easily pull out its factors of $p$.
You can then proceed as follows: Find every solution $x$ to this mod $p$. Then, each of these solutions could lift to $p$ things mod $p^2$ - so you can find the solutions mod $p^2$ checking those. Then you can lift again to $p^3$ and so on - and, since there will be at most four* square roots mod $p^N$ (and only two if $p$ is odd). Thus, you'll only have to check about $4pN$ values for this method to work - a lot better than checking $p^N$ values - but wait, we can do even better!
Note that the actual lifting step can be further simplified: If we know that $x^2equiv ypmodp^N$, then we can try looking for some $z=x+p^Nc$ such that $z^2equiv ypmodp^N+1$. Working this out gives $x^2+2p^Ncequiv ypmodp^N+1$, which is easy to solve for $c$ (or, if $p=2$, we find that $c$ doesn't even matter - half of our previous square roots lift to two new square roots, and the other half don't lift at all!). Doing this, once you figure out the square root mod $p$, it's basically clean sailing from there.
As for actually solving $x^2equiv ypmodp$, there are some ways - for instance, if $p=4k+3$, you can find one using Fermat's little theorem, but it seems you're interesting in small primes (e.g. $2$) where it's not hard to check every possible $x$.
(*I also should explicitly point out that, for $kgeq 3$, there are four solutions to $x^2=1pmod2^k$ - and consequently, any number with a square root actually has four square roots - the ones you missed for $65$ mod $512$ were $pm 223$, which can be found by adding $256$ to your existing roots, since adding $256$ doesn't change the square mod $512$.)
edited Aug 17 at 0:24
answered Aug 17 at 0:19
Milo Brandt
38.5k473133
38.5k473133
Thanks for pointing out the error. Just by dumb luck, my solution reinserted the $pm 223$ when I reduced the congruence to $mod256$.
â steven gregory
Aug 17 at 0:50
add a comment |Â
Thanks for pointing out the error. Just by dumb luck, my solution reinserted the $pm 223$ when I reduced the congruence to $mod256$.
â steven gregory
Aug 17 at 0:50
Thanks for pointing out the error. Just by dumb luck, my solution reinserted the $pm 223$ when I reduced the congruence to $mod256$.
â steven gregory
Aug 17 at 0:50
Thanks for pointing out the error. Just by dumb luck, my solution reinserted the $pm 223$ when I reduced the congruence to $mod256$.
â steven gregory
Aug 17 at 0:50
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
This isn't a general method, but here's a neat trick if $2^k|a-1$ for some large enough $k$.
Claim. If $x^2equiv abmod 2^n$ and $aequiv 1bmod 2^k$, with $nleq 2k$, then
$$xequiv pm fraca+12bmod 2^n-1.$$
Proof. As there are only two residue classes $bmod 2^n-1$ that will satisfy this, it suffices to show that these both do. Setting $b=(a+1)/2$ we need to show that
$$b^2equiv a=2b-1bmod 2^n.$$
Indeed, this is equivalent to
$$2^n|(b-1)^2 Leftrightarrow bequiv 1bmod 2^leftlceilfracn2rightrceil,$$
which is itself equivalent to
$$aequiv 1bmod 2^leftlceilfracn2rightrceil,$$
which is true as $leftlceilfracn2rightrceil leq k$.
So, since we have $x^2equiv abmod 2^9$ and $aequiv 1bmod 2^6$, we have that $xequiv pm fraca+12 = pm 33bmod 2^8.$
A similar result holds in general:
If $p$ is an odd prime with $x^2equiv abmod p^n$ and $aequiv 1bmod 2^k$ with $nleq 2k$, then
$$xequiv pm fraca+12bmod p^n.$$
This can be proven in nearly identical fashion.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
This isn't a general method, but here's a neat trick if $2^k|a-1$ for some large enough $k$.
Claim. If $x^2equiv abmod 2^n$ and $aequiv 1bmod 2^k$, with $nleq 2k$, then
$$xequiv pm fraca+12bmod 2^n-1.$$
Proof. As there are only two residue classes $bmod 2^n-1$ that will satisfy this, it suffices to show that these both do. Setting $b=(a+1)/2$ we need to show that
$$b^2equiv a=2b-1bmod 2^n.$$
Indeed, this is equivalent to
$$2^n|(b-1)^2 Leftrightarrow bequiv 1bmod 2^leftlceilfracn2rightrceil,$$
which is itself equivalent to
$$aequiv 1bmod 2^leftlceilfracn2rightrceil,$$
which is true as $leftlceilfracn2rightrceil leq k$.
So, since we have $x^2equiv abmod 2^9$ and $aequiv 1bmod 2^6$, we have that $xequiv pm fraca+12 = pm 33bmod 2^8.$
A similar result holds in general:
If $p$ is an odd prime with $x^2equiv abmod p^n$ and $aequiv 1bmod 2^k$ with $nleq 2k$, then
$$xequiv pm fraca+12bmod p^n.$$
This can be proven in nearly identical fashion.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
This isn't a general method, but here's a neat trick if $2^k|a-1$ for some large enough $k$.
Claim. If $x^2equiv abmod 2^n$ and $aequiv 1bmod 2^k$, with $nleq 2k$, then
$$xequiv pm fraca+12bmod 2^n-1.$$
Proof. As there are only two residue classes $bmod 2^n-1$ that will satisfy this, it suffices to show that these both do. Setting $b=(a+1)/2$ we need to show that
$$b^2equiv a=2b-1bmod 2^n.$$
Indeed, this is equivalent to
$$2^n|(b-1)^2 Leftrightarrow bequiv 1bmod 2^leftlceilfracn2rightrceil,$$
which is itself equivalent to
$$aequiv 1bmod 2^leftlceilfracn2rightrceil,$$
which is true as $leftlceilfracn2rightrceil leq k$.
So, since we have $x^2equiv abmod 2^9$ and $aequiv 1bmod 2^6$, we have that $xequiv pm fraca+12 = pm 33bmod 2^8.$
A similar result holds in general:
If $p$ is an odd prime with $x^2equiv abmod p^n$ and $aequiv 1bmod 2^k$ with $nleq 2k$, then
$$xequiv pm fraca+12bmod p^n.$$
This can be proven in nearly identical fashion.
This isn't a general method, but here's a neat trick if $2^k|a-1$ for some large enough $k$.
Claim. If $x^2equiv abmod 2^n$ and $aequiv 1bmod 2^k$, with $nleq 2k$, then
$$xequiv pm fraca+12bmod 2^n-1.$$
Proof. As there are only two residue classes $bmod 2^n-1$ that will satisfy this, it suffices to show that these both do. Setting $b=(a+1)/2$ we need to show that
$$b^2equiv a=2b-1bmod 2^n.$$
Indeed, this is equivalent to
$$2^n|(b-1)^2 Leftrightarrow bequiv 1bmod 2^leftlceilfracn2rightrceil,$$
which is itself equivalent to
$$aequiv 1bmod 2^leftlceilfracn2rightrceil,$$
which is true as $leftlceilfracn2rightrceil leq k$.
So, since we have $x^2equiv abmod 2^9$ and $aequiv 1bmod 2^6$, we have that $xequiv pm fraca+12 = pm 33bmod 2^8.$
A similar result holds in general:
If $p$ is an odd prime with $x^2equiv abmod p^n$ and $aequiv 1bmod 2^k$ with $nleq 2k$, then
$$xequiv pm fraca+12bmod p^n.$$
This can be proven in nearly identical fashion.
answered Aug 16 at 23:21
Carl Schildkraut
8,28711238
8,28711238
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2885249%2ftaking-square-roots-modulo-2n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
1
This seems to be related numbertheory.org/php/squareroot.html
â nigel
Aug 16 at 23:09
1
The original equation is actually easier to solve if you use a computation based on the proof of Hensel's lemma. (That's because $y^2 - y$ has a nonzero derivative $pmod2$ but $z^2$ doesn't.)
â Daniel Schepler
Aug 17 at 0:12