Find $ lambda$ such that f(x) has no point of local maxima or minima in $|x|<fracπ2$

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1












Let $$f(x)=(sin(x))^3+ lambda(sin(x))^2$$ for every $x$ in domain of $(frac-π2,fracπ2)$ has no point of local maxima or minima, then find the value of $lambda$ for the given condition to follow.



My process:



(1): found $f'(x)$ and equated with zero to find that it only matters by $(3sinx + 2lambda)$ $ $ and $sinx$ to have change in the sign of derivative around zero.So the $lambda$ becomes 0 and 0 becomes the point of inflection.
Is my process wrong?







share|cite|improve this question
























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    Let $$f(x)=(sin(x))^3+ lambda(sin(x))^2$$ for every $x$ in domain of $(frac-π2,fracπ2)$ has no point of local maxima or minima, then find the value of $lambda$ for the given condition to follow.



    My process:



    (1): found $f'(x)$ and equated with zero to find that it only matters by $(3sinx + 2lambda)$ $ $ and $sinx$ to have change in the sign of derivative around zero.So the $lambda$ becomes 0 and 0 becomes the point of inflection.
    Is my process wrong?







    share|cite|improve this question






















      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      Let $$f(x)=(sin(x))^3+ lambda(sin(x))^2$$ for every $x$ in domain of $(frac-π2,fracπ2)$ has no point of local maxima or minima, then find the value of $lambda$ for the given condition to follow.



      My process:



      (1): found $f'(x)$ and equated with zero to find that it only matters by $(3sinx + 2lambda)$ $ $ and $sinx$ to have change in the sign of derivative around zero.So the $lambda$ becomes 0 and 0 becomes the point of inflection.
      Is my process wrong?







      share|cite|improve this question












      Let $$f(x)=(sin(x))^3+ lambda(sin(x))^2$$ for every $x$ in domain of $(frac-π2,fracπ2)$ has no point of local maxima or minima, then find the value of $lambda$ for the given condition to follow.



      My process:



      (1): found $f'(x)$ and equated with zero to find that it only matters by $(3sinx + 2lambda)$ $ $ and $sinx$ to have change in the sign of derivative around zero.So the $lambda$ becomes 0 and 0 becomes the point of inflection.
      Is my process wrong?









      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Aug 25 at 10:23









      jayant98

      288




      288




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          Yes, your process is correct, the only $lambda$ for which there is no maxima or minima in the interval $(-pi/2,pi/2)$ is $lambda = 0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • Thank you for verifying my process.
            – jayant98
            Aug 25 at 11:01

















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          Solution



          We have
          $$f'(x)=3sin^2 xcos x+2lambdasin x cos x=sin x cos x(3sin x+2lambda),$$ and $$f''(x)=2cos^2 x(3sin x+lambda)-sin^2 x(2lambda+3sin x).$$



          Notice that, whatever $lambda$ is, $f'(0)=0.$ Thus, we at least need $f''(0)=0.$ Otherwise, $f(x)$ reaches its local extremum value at $x=0$. But $f''(0)=2lambda.$ Hence $lambda=0$, which has only one possible value. Now, we may verify that $f(x)=sin^3 x$ could satisfy the conditions we supposed.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2893982%2ffind-lambda-such-that-fx-has-no-point-of-local-maxima-or-minima-in-x-f%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            1
            down vote



            accepted










            Yes, your process is correct, the only $lambda$ for which there is no maxima or minima in the interval $(-pi/2,pi/2)$ is $lambda = 0$.






            share|cite|improve this answer




















            • Thank you for verifying my process.
              – jayant98
              Aug 25 at 11:01














            up vote
            1
            down vote



            accepted










            Yes, your process is correct, the only $lambda$ for which there is no maxima or minima in the interval $(-pi/2,pi/2)$ is $lambda = 0$.






            share|cite|improve this answer




















            • Thank you for verifying my process.
              – jayant98
              Aug 25 at 11:01












            up vote
            1
            down vote



            accepted







            up vote
            1
            down vote



            accepted






            Yes, your process is correct, the only $lambda$ for which there is no maxima or minima in the interval $(-pi/2,pi/2)$ is $lambda = 0$.






            share|cite|improve this answer












            Yes, your process is correct, the only $lambda$ for which there is no maxima or minima in the interval $(-pi/2,pi/2)$ is $lambda = 0$.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Aug 25 at 10:45









            uniquesolution

            8,261823




            8,261823











            • Thank you for verifying my process.
              – jayant98
              Aug 25 at 11:01
















            • Thank you for verifying my process.
              – jayant98
              Aug 25 at 11:01















            Thank you for verifying my process.
            – jayant98
            Aug 25 at 11:01




            Thank you for verifying my process.
            – jayant98
            Aug 25 at 11:01










            up vote
            1
            down vote













            Solution



            We have
            $$f'(x)=3sin^2 xcos x+2lambdasin x cos x=sin x cos x(3sin x+2lambda),$$ and $$f''(x)=2cos^2 x(3sin x+lambda)-sin^2 x(2lambda+3sin x).$$



            Notice that, whatever $lambda$ is, $f'(0)=0.$ Thus, we at least need $f''(0)=0.$ Otherwise, $f(x)$ reaches its local extremum value at $x=0$. But $f''(0)=2lambda.$ Hence $lambda=0$, which has only one possible value. Now, we may verify that $f(x)=sin^3 x$ could satisfy the conditions we supposed.






            share|cite|improve this answer
























              up vote
              1
              down vote













              Solution



              We have
              $$f'(x)=3sin^2 xcos x+2lambdasin x cos x=sin x cos x(3sin x+2lambda),$$ and $$f''(x)=2cos^2 x(3sin x+lambda)-sin^2 x(2lambda+3sin x).$$



              Notice that, whatever $lambda$ is, $f'(0)=0.$ Thus, we at least need $f''(0)=0.$ Otherwise, $f(x)$ reaches its local extremum value at $x=0$. But $f''(0)=2lambda.$ Hence $lambda=0$, which has only one possible value. Now, we may verify that $f(x)=sin^3 x$ could satisfy the conditions we supposed.






              share|cite|improve this answer






















                up vote
                1
                down vote










                up vote
                1
                down vote









                Solution



                We have
                $$f'(x)=3sin^2 xcos x+2lambdasin x cos x=sin x cos x(3sin x+2lambda),$$ and $$f''(x)=2cos^2 x(3sin x+lambda)-sin^2 x(2lambda+3sin x).$$



                Notice that, whatever $lambda$ is, $f'(0)=0.$ Thus, we at least need $f''(0)=0.$ Otherwise, $f(x)$ reaches its local extremum value at $x=0$. But $f''(0)=2lambda.$ Hence $lambda=0$, which has only one possible value. Now, we may verify that $f(x)=sin^3 x$ could satisfy the conditions we supposed.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                Solution



                We have
                $$f'(x)=3sin^2 xcos x+2lambdasin x cos x=sin x cos x(3sin x+2lambda),$$ and $$f''(x)=2cos^2 x(3sin x+lambda)-sin^2 x(2lambda+3sin x).$$



                Notice that, whatever $lambda$ is, $f'(0)=0.$ Thus, we at least need $f''(0)=0.$ Otherwise, $f(x)$ reaches its local extremum value at $x=0$. But $f''(0)=2lambda.$ Hence $lambda=0$, which has only one possible value. Now, we may verify that $f(x)=sin^3 x$ could satisfy the conditions we supposed.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Aug 25 at 11:27









                mengdie1982

                3,628216




                3,628216



























                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2893982%2ffind-lambda-such-that-fx-has-no-point-of-local-maxima-or-minima-in-x-f%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    這個網誌中的熱門文章

                    Is there any way to eliminate the singular point to solve this integral by hand or by approximations?

                    Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

                    Carbon dioxide