Check measure theory argument

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I'm trying to solve the following exercise.




[Cohn, 2.3.5] Let $(X, mathscrA, mu)$ be a measure space, and $f: X to [-infty, +infty]$ an $mathscrA$-measurable function whose integral exists and is not equal to $-infty$. Show that if $g: X to [-infty, +infty]$ is $mathscrA$-measurable and satisfies $f leq g$ for $mu$-almost every $x in X$, then the integral of $g$ exists and satisfies $int g , dmu geq int f , dmu$.




Here's what I did.



Suppose that $S$ and $T$ are $[0, +infty]$-valued $mathscrA$-measurable functions on $X$ such that $S leq T$ for $mu$-almost every $x$, and let $A = x : S(x) = T(x)$. Write $tildeT = mathbf1_A T +h$, where $h(x) = +infty$ on $A^c$, and else $h(x) = 0$. It's clear that $int h = 0$ (take $h_n = n mathbb1_A^c$. the functions $h_n$ are simple, $h_n uparrow h$, and thus $int h = lim (n mu(A^c)) = 0$.). Additionally, $int S leq int tildeT$, since $S leq tildeT$ everywhere and any simple function $phi$ satisfying $phi leq S$ also satisfies $phi leq tildeT$. By linearity, $int tildeT = int_A T = int T$, with the last equality due to $0 leq mathbf1_A^c T leq h$.



Now decompose $f =f^+ - f^-$and $g = g^+ - g^-$ as is standard. At once, $g^+ geq f^+$ and $g^- leq f^-$ almost everywhere hold. Thus, by the argument above, one obtains $int g^+ geq int f^+$ and $int g^- leq int f^- < +infty$ (the last inequality follows because if $int f^+ < infty$, then $int f^- < +infty$, otherwise $int f = -infty$). This implies $int g$ exists and further,
$$
int g = int g^+ - int g^- geq int f^+ - int f^- = int f.
$$
This is the desired result.



Does that look fine?







share|cite|improve this question






















  • Looks good to me.
    – pointguard0
    Aug 25 at 9:09














up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I'm trying to solve the following exercise.




[Cohn, 2.3.5] Let $(X, mathscrA, mu)$ be a measure space, and $f: X to [-infty, +infty]$ an $mathscrA$-measurable function whose integral exists and is not equal to $-infty$. Show that if $g: X to [-infty, +infty]$ is $mathscrA$-measurable and satisfies $f leq g$ for $mu$-almost every $x in X$, then the integral of $g$ exists and satisfies $int g , dmu geq int f , dmu$.




Here's what I did.



Suppose that $S$ and $T$ are $[0, +infty]$-valued $mathscrA$-measurable functions on $X$ such that $S leq T$ for $mu$-almost every $x$, and let $A = x : S(x) = T(x)$. Write $tildeT = mathbf1_A T +h$, where $h(x) = +infty$ on $A^c$, and else $h(x) = 0$. It's clear that $int h = 0$ (take $h_n = n mathbb1_A^c$. the functions $h_n$ are simple, $h_n uparrow h$, and thus $int h = lim (n mu(A^c)) = 0$.). Additionally, $int S leq int tildeT$, since $S leq tildeT$ everywhere and any simple function $phi$ satisfying $phi leq S$ also satisfies $phi leq tildeT$. By linearity, $int tildeT = int_A T = int T$, with the last equality due to $0 leq mathbf1_A^c T leq h$.



Now decompose $f =f^+ - f^-$and $g = g^+ - g^-$ as is standard. At once, $g^+ geq f^+$ and $g^- leq f^-$ almost everywhere hold. Thus, by the argument above, one obtains $int g^+ geq int f^+$ and $int g^- leq int f^- < +infty$ (the last inequality follows because if $int f^+ < infty$, then $int f^- < +infty$, otherwise $int f = -infty$). This implies $int g$ exists and further,
$$
int g = int g^+ - int g^- geq int f^+ - int f^- = int f.
$$
This is the desired result.



Does that look fine?







share|cite|improve this question






















  • Looks good to me.
    – pointguard0
    Aug 25 at 9:09












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











I'm trying to solve the following exercise.




[Cohn, 2.3.5] Let $(X, mathscrA, mu)$ be a measure space, and $f: X to [-infty, +infty]$ an $mathscrA$-measurable function whose integral exists and is not equal to $-infty$. Show that if $g: X to [-infty, +infty]$ is $mathscrA$-measurable and satisfies $f leq g$ for $mu$-almost every $x in X$, then the integral of $g$ exists and satisfies $int g , dmu geq int f , dmu$.




Here's what I did.



Suppose that $S$ and $T$ are $[0, +infty]$-valued $mathscrA$-measurable functions on $X$ such that $S leq T$ for $mu$-almost every $x$, and let $A = x : S(x) = T(x)$. Write $tildeT = mathbf1_A T +h$, where $h(x) = +infty$ on $A^c$, and else $h(x) = 0$. It's clear that $int h = 0$ (take $h_n = n mathbb1_A^c$. the functions $h_n$ are simple, $h_n uparrow h$, and thus $int h = lim (n mu(A^c)) = 0$.). Additionally, $int S leq int tildeT$, since $S leq tildeT$ everywhere and any simple function $phi$ satisfying $phi leq S$ also satisfies $phi leq tildeT$. By linearity, $int tildeT = int_A T = int T$, with the last equality due to $0 leq mathbf1_A^c T leq h$.



Now decompose $f =f^+ - f^-$and $g = g^+ - g^-$ as is standard. At once, $g^+ geq f^+$ and $g^- leq f^-$ almost everywhere hold. Thus, by the argument above, one obtains $int g^+ geq int f^+$ and $int g^- leq int f^- < +infty$ (the last inequality follows because if $int f^+ < infty$, then $int f^- < +infty$, otherwise $int f = -infty$). This implies $int g$ exists and further,
$$
int g = int g^+ - int g^- geq int f^+ - int f^- = int f.
$$
This is the desired result.



Does that look fine?







share|cite|improve this question














I'm trying to solve the following exercise.




[Cohn, 2.3.5] Let $(X, mathscrA, mu)$ be a measure space, and $f: X to [-infty, +infty]$ an $mathscrA$-measurable function whose integral exists and is not equal to $-infty$. Show that if $g: X to [-infty, +infty]$ is $mathscrA$-measurable and satisfies $f leq g$ for $mu$-almost every $x in X$, then the integral of $g$ exists and satisfies $int g , dmu geq int f , dmu$.




Here's what I did.



Suppose that $S$ and $T$ are $[0, +infty]$-valued $mathscrA$-measurable functions on $X$ such that $S leq T$ for $mu$-almost every $x$, and let $A = x : S(x) = T(x)$. Write $tildeT = mathbf1_A T +h$, where $h(x) = +infty$ on $A^c$, and else $h(x) = 0$. It's clear that $int h = 0$ (take $h_n = n mathbb1_A^c$. the functions $h_n$ are simple, $h_n uparrow h$, and thus $int h = lim (n mu(A^c)) = 0$.). Additionally, $int S leq int tildeT$, since $S leq tildeT$ everywhere and any simple function $phi$ satisfying $phi leq S$ also satisfies $phi leq tildeT$. By linearity, $int tildeT = int_A T = int T$, with the last equality due to $0 leq mathbf1_A^c T leq h$.



Now decompose $f =f^+ - f^-$and $g = g^+ - g^-$ as is standard. At once, $g^+ geq f^+$ and $g^- leq f^-$ almost everywhere hold. Thus, by the argument above, one obtains $int g^+ geq int f^+$ and $int g^- leq int f^- < +infty$ (the last inequality follows because if $int f^+ < infty$, then $int f^- < +infty$, otherwise $int f = -infty$). This implies $int g$ exists and further,
$$
int g = int g^+ - int g^- geq int f^+ - int f^- = int f.
$$
This is the desired result.



Does that look fine?









share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 25 at 19:08

























asked Aug 25 at 8:37









Drew Brady

523214




523214











  • Looks good to me.
    – pointguard0
    Aug 25 at 9:09
















  • Looks good to me.
    – pointguard0
    Aug 25 at 9:09















Looks good to me.
– pointguard0
Aug 25 at 9:09




Looks good to me.
– pointguard0
Aug 25 at 9:09















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2893902%2fcheck-measure-theory-argument%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest



































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2893902%2fcheck-measure-theory-argument%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

Is there any way to eliminate the singular point to solve this integral by hand or by approximations?

Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

Carbon dioxide