Additive functor on a long exact sequence

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












If $$0to X_0to X_1to X_2to X_3to dotsb$$ is exact. Why does an additive, left-exact covariant functor $G$ gives us an exact sequence:
$$0to G(X_0)to G(X_1)to G(X_2)$$
I know that by left-exactness is preserves monomorphisms so that
$$0to G(X_0)to G(X_1)$$
should be exact, but why exactness around $G(X_1)$?



Should I just think about changing the map out of $X_2$ to $X_2to 0$?







share|cite|improve this question






















  • It the “additive covariant functor $G$” suppose do be left-exact?
    – Jendrik Stelzner
    Aug 25 at 9:57










  • @JendrikStelzner yeah my definition I read has that
    – user587047
    Aug 25 at 10:09














up vote
2
down vote

favorite












If $$0to X_0to X_1to X_2to X_3to dotsb$$ is exact. Why does an additive, left-exact covariant functor $G$ gives us an exact sequence:
$$0to G(X_0)to G(X_1)to G(X_2)$$
I know that by left-exactness is preserves monomorphisms so that
$$0to G(X_0)to G(X_1)$$
should be exact, but why exactness around $G(X_1)$?



Should I just think about changing the map out of $X_2$ to $X_2to 0$?







share|cite|improve this question






















  • It the “additive covariant functor $G$” suppose do be left-exact?
    – Jendrik Stelzner
    Aug 25 at 9:57










  • @JendrikStelzner yeah my definition I read has that
    – user587047
    Aug 25 at 10:09












up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











If $$0to X_0to X_1to X_2to X_3to dotsb$$ is exact. Why does an additive, left-exact covariant functor $G$ gives us an exact sequence:
$$0to G(X_0)to G(X_1)to G(X_2)$$
I know that by left-exactness is preserves monomorphisms so that
$$0to G(X_0)to G(X_1)$$
should be exact, but why exactness around $G(X_1)$?



Should I just think about changing the map out of $X_2$ to $X_2to 0$?







share|cite|improve this question














If $$0to X_0to X_1to X_2to X_3to dotsb$$ is exact. Why does an additive, left-exact covariant functor $G$ gives us an exact sequence:
$$0to G(X_0)to G(X_1)to G(X_2)$$
I know that by left-exactness is preserves monomorphisms so that
$$0to G(X_0)to G(X_1)$$
should be exact, but why exactness around $G(X_1)$?



Should I just think about changing the map out of $X_2$ to $X_2to 0$?









share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 25 at 10:16









Jendrik Stelzner

7,57221037




7,57221037










asked Aug 25 at 9:43









user587047

112




112











  • It the “additive covariant functor $G$” suppose do be left-exact?
    – Jendrik Stelzner
    Aug 25 at 9:57










  • @JendrikStelzner yeah my definition I read has that
    – user587047
    Aug 25 at 10:09
















  • It the “additive covariant functor $G$” suppose do be left-exact?
    – Jendrik Stelzner
    Aug 25 at 9:57










  • @JendrikStelzner yeah my definition I read has that
    – user587047
    Aug 25 at 10:09















It the “additive covariant functor $G$” suppose do be left-exact?
– Jendrik Stelzner
Aug 25 at 9:57




It the “additive covariant functor $G$” suppose do be left-exact?
– Jendrik Stelzner
Aug 25 at 9:57












@JendrikStelzner yeah my definition I read has that
– user587047
Aug 25 at 10:09




@JendrikStelzner yeah my definition I read has that
– user587047
Aug 25 at 10:09










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













For an additive functor $G colon mathcalA to mathcalB$ the following two definitions of left-exactness are equivalent:



  1. For every short exact sequence $0 to A'' to A to A' to 0$ in $mathcalA$, the induced sequence
    $$
    0 to G(A'') to G(A) to G(A')
    $$
    in $mathcalB$ is again exact.


  2. For every exact sequence $0 to A'' to A to A'$ in $mathcalA$, the induced sequence
    $$
    0 to G(A'') to G(A) to G(A')
    $$
    in $mathcalB$ is again exact.


A proof of the equivalence of the two definitions (namely the implication $1 implies 2$) can be found here.
Note that left-exactness is (in general) much stronger than just preserving monomorphisms (see here for an example of an additive functor which preserves monomorphisms but is not left-exact).



We can solve the problem by applying the second characterization of left-exactness:
It follows from the exactness of
$$
0 to X_0 to X_1 to X_2 to X_3 to dotsb
$$
that the truncated sequence
$$
0 to X_0 to X_1 to X_2
$$
is exact, from which it then follows by the left-exactness of $G$ that the sequence
$$
0 to G(X_0) to G(X_1) to G(X_2)
$$
is exact.






share|cite|improve this answer




















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2893953%2fadditive-functor-on-a-long-exact-sequence%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote













    For an additive functor $G colon mathcalA to mathcalB$ the following two definitions of left-exactness are equivalent:



    1. For every short exact sequence $0 to A'' to A to A' to 0$ in $mathcalA$, the induced sequence
      $$
      0 to G(A'') to G(A) to G(A')
      $$
      in $mathcalB$ is again exact.


    2. For every exact sequence $0 to A'' to A to A'$ in $mathcalA$, the induced sequence
      $$
      0 to G(A'') to G(A) to G(A')
      $$
      in $mathcalB$ is again exact.


    A proof of the equivalence of the two definitions (namely the implication $1 implies 2$) can be found here.
    Note that left-exactness is (in general) much stronger than just preserving monomorphisms (see here for an example of an additive functor which preserves monomorphisms but is not left-exact).



    We can solve the problem by applying the second characterization of left-exactness:
    It follows from the exactness of
    $$
    0 to X_0 to X_1 to X_2 to X_3 to dotsb
    $$
    that the truncated sequence
    $$
    0 to X_0 to X_1 to X_2
    $$
    is exact, from which it then follows by the left-exactness of $G$ that the sequence
    $$
    0 to G(X_0) to G(X_1) to G(X_2)
    $$
    is exact.






    share|cite|improve this answer
























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      For an additive functor $G colon mathcalA to mathcalB$ the following two definitions of left-exactness are equivalent:



      1. For every short exact sequence $0 to A'' to A to A' to 0$ in $mathcalA$, the induced sequence
        $$
        0 to G(A'') to G(A) to G(A')
        $$
        in $mathcalB$ is again exact.


      2. For every exact sequence $0 to A'' to A to A'$ in $mathcalA$, the induced sequence
        $$
        0 to G(A'') to G(A) to G(A')
        $$
        in $mathcalB$ is again exact.


      A proof of the equivalence of the two definitions (namely the implication $1 implies 2$) can be found here.
      Note that left-exactness is (in general) much stronger than just preserving monomorphisms (see here for an example of an additive functor which preserves monomorphisms but is not left-exact).



      We can solve the problem by applying the second characterization of left-exactness:
      It follows from the exactness of
      $$
      0 to X_0 to X_1 to X_2 to X_3 to dotsb
      $$
      that the truncated sequence
      $$
      0 to X_0 to X_1 to X_2
      $$
      is exact, from which it then follows by the left-exactness of $G$ that the sequence
      $$
      0 to G(X_0) to G(X_1) to G(X_2)
      $$
      is exact.






      share|cite|improve this answer






















        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        For an additive functor $G colon mathcalA to mathcalB$ the following two definitions of left-exactness are equivalent:



        1. For every short exact sequence $0 to A'' to A to A' to 0$ in $mathcalA$, the induced sequence
          $$
          0 to G(A'') to G(A) to G(A')
          $$
          in $mathcalB$ is again exact.


        2. For every exact sequence $0 to A'' to A to A'$ in $mathcalA$, the induced sequence
          $$
          0 to G(A'') to G(A) to G(A')
          $$
          in $mathcalB$ is again exact.


        A proof of the equivalence of the two definitions (namely the implication $1 implies 2$) can be found here.
        Note that left-exactness is (in general) much stronger than just preserving monomorphisms (see here for an example of an additive functor which preserves monomorphisms but is not left-exact).



        We can solve the problem by applying the second characterization of left-exactness:
        It follows from the exactness of
        $$
        0 to X_0 to X_1 to X_2 to X_3 to dotsb
        $$
        that the truncated sequence
        $$
        0 to X_0 to X_1 to X_2
        $$
        is exact, from which it then follows by the left-exactness of $G$ that the sequence
        $$
        0 to G(X_0) to G(X_1) to G(X_2)
        $$
        is exact.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        For an additive functor $G colon mathcalA to mathcalB$ the following two definitions of left-exactness are equivalent:



        1. For every short exact sequence $0 to A'' to A to A' to 0$ in $mathcalA$, the induced sequence
          $$
          0 to G(A'') to G(A) to G(A')
          $$
          in $mathcalB$ is again exact.


        2. For every exact sequence $0 to A'' to A to A'$ in $mathcalA$, the induced sequence
          $$
          0 to G(A'') to G(A) to G(A')
          $$
          in $mathcalB$ is again exact.


        A proof of the equivalence of the two definitions (namely the implication $1 implies 2$) can be found here.
        Note that left-exactness is (in general) much stronger than just preserving monomorphisms (see here for an example of an additive functor which preserves monomorphisms but is not left-exact).



        We can solve the problem by applying the second characterization of left-exactness:
        It follows from the exactness of
        $$
        0 to X_0 to X_1 to X_2 to X_3 to dotsb
        $$
        that the truncated sequence
        $$
        0 to X_0 to X_1 to X_2
        $$
        is exact, from which it then follows by the left-exactness of $G$ that the sequence
        $$
        0 to G(X_0) to G(X_1) to G(X_2)
        $$
        is exact.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Aug 25 at 10:15









        Jendrik Stelzner

        7,57221037




        7,57221037



























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2893953%2fadditive-functor-on-a-long-exact-sequence%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            這個網誌中的熱門文章

            Is there any way to eliminate the singular point to solve this integral by hand or by approximations?

            Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

            Carbon dioxide