“Bilateral Mellin convolution”

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












The Mellin convolution of two functions, when it exists, is of the form
$$
(f ast_M g)(t)
= int_0^infty
fleft( fracttau right)
g(tau)
fracmathrmdtautau
$$
and has the property that
$$
mathscrM(f ast_M g)(s)
= mathscrMf cdot mathscrMg
$$
where $mathscrM$ is the Mellin transform and $cdot$ is pointwise multiplication.



Sometimes, however, it can be useful to evaluate convolution integrals which are identical to the one given above, but integrating from $-infty$ to $infty$ rather than from 0 to $infty$. In other words
$$
(f ast_widehatM g)(t)
= int_-infty^infty
fleft( fracttau right)
g(tau)
fracmathrmdtautau
$$
Does there exist a “modified Mellin transform” which has the similar property that
$$
widehat,mathscrM(f ast_widehatM g)(s)
= widehat,mathscrMf cdot widehat,mathscrMg
$$
with this “bilateral” Mellin convolution?



To note, I am aware that many authors have defined a bilateral Mellin transform according to different conventions (often as a pair of unilateral Mellin transforms). So I am not asking for an “ad hoc” definition of a bilateral Mellin transform. Rather, what I am asking is, is it possible to somehow work “backward” from the above bilateral convolution definition to obtain a modified Mellin transform, which has the property that the pointwise product in this modified Mellin domain yields the above “bilateral multiplicative Mellin convolution” in the time domain?







share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    The Mellin convolution of two functions, when it exists, is of the form
    $$
    (f ast_M g)(t)
    = int_0^infty
    fleft( fracttau right)
    g(tau)
    fracmathrmdtautau
    $$
    and has the property that
    $$
    mathscrM(f ast_M g)(s)
    = mathscrMf cdot mathscrMg
    $$
    where $mathscrM$ is the Mellin transform and $cdot$ is pointwise multiplication.



    Sometimes, however, it can be useful to evaluate convolution integrals which are identical to the one given above, but integrating from $-infty$ to $infty$ rather than from 0 to $infty$. In other words
    $$
    (f ast_widehatM g)(t)
    = int_-infty^infty
    fleft( fracttau right)
    g(tau)
    fracmathrmdtautau
    $$
    Does there exist a “modified Mellin transform” which has the similar property that
    $$
    widehat,mathscrM(f ast_widehatM g)(s)
    = widehat,mathscrMf cdot widehat,mathscrMg
    $$
    with this “bilateral” Mellin convolution?



    To note, I am aware that many authors have defined a bilateral Mellin transform according to different conventions (often as a pair of unilateral Mellin transforms). So I am not asking for an “ad hoc” definition of a bilateral Mellin transform. Rather, what I am asking is, is it possible to somehow work “backward” from the above bilateral convolution definition to obtain a modified Mellin transform, which has the property that the pointwise product in this modified Mellin domain yields the above “bilateral multiplicative Mellin convolution” in the time domain?







    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      The Mellin convolution of two functions, when it exists, is of the form
      $$
      (f ast_M g)(t)
      = int_0^infty
      fleft( fracttau right)
      g(tau)
      fracmathrmdtautau
      $$
      and has the property that
      $$
      mathscrM(f ast_M g)(s)
      = mathscrMf cdot mathscrMg
      $$
      where $mathscrM$ is the Mellin transform and $cdot$ is pointwise multiplication.



      Sometimes, however, it can be useful to evaluate convolution integrals which are identical to the one given above, but integrating from $-infty$ to $infty$ rather than from 0 to $infty$. In other words
      $$
      (f ast_widehatM g)(t)
      = int_-infty^infty
      fleft( fracttau right)
      g(tau)
      fracmathrmdtautau
      $$
      Does there exist a “modified Mellin transform” which has the similar property that
      $$
      widehat,mathscrM(f ast_widehatM g)(s)
      = widehat,mathscrMf cdot widehat,mathscrMg
      $$
      with this “bilateral” Mellin convolution?



      To note, I am aware that many authors have defined a bilateral Mellin transform according to different conventions (often as a pair of unilateral Mellin transforms). So I am not asking for an “ad hoc” definition of a bilateral Mellin transform. Rather, what I am asking is, is it possible to somehow work “backward” from the above bilateral convolution definition to obtain a modified Mellin transform, which has the property that the pointwise product in this modified Mellin domain yields the above “bilateral multiplicative Mellin convolution” in the time domain?







      share|cite|improve this question














      The Mellin convolution of two functions, when it exists, is of the form
      $$
      (f ast_M g)(t)
      = int_0^infty
      fleft( fracttau right)
      g(tau)
      fracmathrmdtautau
      $$
      and has the property that
      $$
      mathscrM(f ast_M g)(s)
      = mathscrMf cdot mathscrMg
      $$
      where $mathscrM$ is the Mellin transform and $cdot$ is pointwise multiplication.



      Sometimes, however, it can be useful to evaluate convolution integrals which are identical to the one given above, but integrating from $-infty$ to $infty$ rather than from 0 to $infty$. In other words
      $$
      (f ast_widehatM g)(t)
      = int_-infty^infty
      fleft( fracttau right)
      g(tau)
      fracmathrmdtautau
      $$
      Does there exist a “modified Mellin transform” which has the similar property that
      $$
      widehat,mathscrM(f ast_widehatM g)(s)
      = widehat,mathscrMf cdot widehat,mathscrMg
      $$
      with this “bilateral” Mellin convolution?



      To note, I am aware that many authors have defined a bilateral Mellin transform according to different conventions (often as a pair of unilateral Mellin transforms). So I am not asking for an “ad hoc” definition of a bilateral Mellin transform. Rather, what I am asking is, is it possible to somehow work “backward” from the above bilateral convolution definition to obtain a modified Mellin transform, which has the property that the pointwise product in this modified Mellin domain yields the above “bilateral multiplicative Mellin convolution” in the time domain?









      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Aug 25 at 9:54









      Jendrik Stelzner

      7,57221037




      7,57221037










      asked Aug 25 at 9:39









      Mike Battaglia

      1,1611026




      1,1611026

























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2893944%2fbilateral-mellin-convolution%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest



































          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2893944%2fbilateral-mellin-convolution%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          Is there any way to eliminate the singular point to solve this integral by hand or by approximations?

          Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

          Carbon dioxide