Why is this plane $x + 2y + 3z=0$ a subspace of $mathbbR^3$? [closed]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I am reading this text:



enter image description here



and I'm confused as to how/why they made y and z free variables? Also, why is this set linearly independent?



Is it linearly independent because:



$$c_1 beginbmatrix -2 & 1 & 0 endbmatrix + c_2 beginbmatrix -3 & 0 & 1 endbmatrix = beginbmatrix 0 & 0 & 0 endbmatrix$$



produces:
$$-2 * c_1 + (-3) * c_2 = 0$$
$$c_1 = 0$$
$$c_2 = 0$$



so the only solution is trivial. Is that why this is linearly independent?



Lastly, what does 2-dimensional mean? Is it because it has two vectors? Why is this not surprising? Do basis for $mathbbR^3$ have 3 vectors?










share|cite|improve this question















closed as off-topic by Xander Henderson, amWhy, Did, Ennar, Christoph Sep 6 at 11:09


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Xander Henderson, amWhy, Did, Ennar, Christoph
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • the dimension of a subspace of a vector space is the number of vectors in the basis for the subspace.
    – DaveNine
    Sep 5 at 21:32






  • 6




    It looks like a lot of your questions can be resolved if you simply reviewed the definitions of these things carefully. Read slowly and thoughtfully.
    – DaveNine
    Sep 5 at 21:36










  • I am asking clarifying questions and I Think it's fine to do.
    – Jwan622
    Sep 6 at 0:31










  • I don't think my questions were clear in my text
    – Jwan622
    Sep 6 at 13:57














up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I am reading this text:



enter image description here



and I'm confused as to how/why they made y and z free variables? Also, why is this set linearly independent?



Is it linearly independent because:



$$c_1 beginbmatrix -2 & 1 & 0 endbmatrix + c_2 beginbmatrix -3 & 0 & 1 endbmatrix = beginbmatrix 0 & 0 & 0 endbmatrix$$



produces:
$$-2 * c_1 + (-3) * c_2 = 0$$
$$c_1 = 0$$
$$c_2 = 0$$



so the only solution is trivial. Is that why this is linearly independent?



Lastly, what does 2-dimensional mean? Is it because it has two vectors? Why is this not surprising? Do basis for $mathbbR^3$ have 3 vectors?










share|cite|improve this question















closed as off-topic by Xander Henderson, amWhy, Did, Ennar, Christoph Sep 6 at 11:09


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Xander Henderson, amWhy, Did, Ennar, Christoph
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • the dimension of a subspace of a vector space is the number of vectors in the basis for the subspace.
    – DaveNine
    Sep 5 at 21:32






  • 6




    It looks like a lot of your questions can be resolved if you simply reviewed the definitions of these things carefully. Read slowly and thoughtfully.
    – DaveNine
    Sep 5 at 21:36










  • I am asking clarifying questions and I Think it's fine to do.
    – Jwan622
    Sep 6 at 0:31










  • I don't think my questions were clear in my text
    – Jwan622
    Sep 6 at 13:57












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I am reading this text:



enter image description here



and I'm confused as to how/why they made y and z free variables? Also, why is this set linearly independent?



Is it linearly independent because:



$$c_1 beginbmatrix -2 & 1 & 0 endbmatrix + c_2 beginbmatrix -3 & 0 & 1 endbmatrix = beginbmatrix 0 & 0 & 0 endbmatrix$$



produces:
$$-2 * c_1 + (-3) * c_2 = 0$$
$$c_1 = 0$$
$$c_2 = 0$$



so the only solution is trivial. Is that why this is linearly independent?



Lastly, what does 2-dimensional mean? Is it because it has two vectors? Why is this not surprising? Do basis for $mathbbR^3$ have 3 vectors?










share|cite|improve this question















I am reading this text:



enter image description here



and I'm confused as to how/why they made y and z free variables? Also, why is this set linearly independent?



Is it linearly independent because:



$$c_1 beginbmatrix -2 & 1 & 0 endbmatrix + c_2 beginbmatrix -3 & 0 & 1 endbmatrix = beginbmatrix 0 & 0 & 0 endbmatrix$$



produces:
$$-2 * c_1 + (-3) * c_2 = 0$$
$$c_1 = 0$$
$$c_2 = 0$$



so the only solution is trivial. Is that why this is linearly independent?



Lastly, what does 2-dimensional mean? Is it because it has two vectors? Why is this not surprising? Do basis for $mathbbR^3$ have 3 vectors?







linear-algebra






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Sep 6 at 10:51









Christian Blatter

166k7110312




166k7110312










asked Sep 5 at 21:26









Jwan622

1,92111326




1,92111326




closed as off-topic by Xander Henderson, amWhy, Did, Ennar, Christoph Sep 6 at 11:09


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Xander Henderson, amWhy, Did, Ennar, Christoph
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




closed as off-topic by Xander Henderson, amWhy, Did, Ennar, Christoph Sep 6 at 11:09


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Xander Henderson, amWhy, Did, Ennar, Christoph
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • the dimension of a subspace of a vector space is the number of vectors in the basis for the subspace.
    – DaveNine
    Sep 5 at 21:32






  • 6




    It looks like a lot of your questions can be resolved if you simply reviewed the definitions of these things carefully. Read slowly and thoughtfully.
    – DaveNine
    Sep 5 at 21:36










  • I am asking clarifying questions and I Think it's fine to do.
    – Jwan622
    Sep 6 at 0:31










  • I don't think my questions were clear in my text
    – Jwan622
    Sep 6 at 13:57
















  • the dimension of a subspace of a vector space is the number of vectors in the basis for the subspace.
    – DaveNine
    Sep 5 at 21:32






  • 6




    It looks like a lot of your questions can be resolved if you simply reviewed the definitions of these things carefully. Read slowly and thoughtfully.
    – DaveNine
    Sep 5 at 21:36










  • I am asking clarifying questions and I Think it's fine to do.
    – Jwan622
    Sep 6 at 0:31










  • I don't think my questions were clear in my text
    – Jwan622
    Sep 6 at 13:57















the dimension of a subspace of a vector space is the number of vectors in the basis for the subspace.
– DaveNine
Sep 5 at 21:32




the dimension of a subspace of a vector space is the number of vectors in the basis for the subspace.
– DaveNine
Sep 5 at 21:32




6




6




It looks like a lot of your questions can be resolved if you simply reviewed the definitions of these things carefully. Read slowly and thoughtfully.
– DaveNine
Sep 5 at 21:36




It looks like a lot of your questions can be resolved if you simply reviewed the definitions of these things carefully. Read slowly and thoughtfully.
– DaveNine
Sep 5 at 21:36












I am asking clarifying questions and I Think it's fine to do.
– Jwan622
Sep 6 at 0:31




I am asking clarifying questions and I Think it's fine to do.
– Jwan622
Sep 6 at 0:31












I don't think my questions were clear in my text
– Jwan622
Sep 6 at 13:57




I don't think my questions were clear in my text
– Jwan622
Sep 6 at 13:57










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













We are looking for the set of all points $(x,y,z)$ which satisfy the following equation



$$x+2y+3z=0$$



and we can easily show, by the definition, that the set is a subspace of $mathbbR^3$.



To find a basis of the subspace observe that we have 3 variable and only one equation therefore we can set any 2 variables free and determine the third as for example



$$y=s quad z=t implies x=-2s-3t$$



therefore the subspace can be written as



$$beginbmatrixx\y\zendbmatrix=sbeginbmatrix-2\1\0endbmatrix+tbeginbmatrix-3\0\1endbmatrix$$



therefore since the subspace is spanned by two linearly independent vectors, by definition, we have that the dimension is $2$, the given equation indeed represents a plane.



Therefore with reference to you questions



  • yes the way you follows show that the two vectors are linearly
    independent, that is by definition $c_1v_1+c_2v_2=0 iff c_1=c_2=0$;
    in that case we don't need to check that directly since these two vectors have
    been obtained in such way to be linearly independent; indeed they are
    in the form $(a,1,0)$ and $(b,0,1)$ and therefore by linear
    combination we can't never reduce to $(0,0,0)$;

  • $2$ dimensional means that the subspace is spanned by $2$ linearly independent vectors (revise the definition of basis and dimension) and since $mathbbR^3$ is spanned by the three linearly independent vectors $e_1=(1,0,0)$, $e_2=(0,1,0)$ and $e_3=(0,0,1)$ its dimension is $3$ of course; the same argument applies to $mathbbR^n$ which has dimension $n$.





share|cite|improve this answer


















  • 3




    Doesn't this repeat the explanation given in the text? To answer, please don't summarize the explanation that the user clearly doesn't understand.
    – amWhy
    Sep 5 at 21:45










  • @amWhy I like to write the full explanation to better present the concepts. I'm awaiting for a reply form the OP in order to review if necessary the answer. Thanks for your suggestion.
    – gimusi
    Sep 5 at 21:47







  • 3




    What you wrote is merely a paraphrase of the very text the asker seems to not understand (and you failed to cite the text as your source of paraphrasing). So how about vary the words, provide another example, explain what is meant by "free variables"... don't just spit out exactly the work that the asker is confused with. So no, you didn't better present anything than the text did, and the text didn't work for the OP. So, are you simply going to keep spitting out the order and presentation of the text, or try to actually test your ability to teach?
    – amWhy
    Sep 5 at 21:52







  • 2




    @amWhy I'm simply trying to help a person to understand the concepts and also to understand better the concepts by myself. If it is merely a repetition of the OP he can ask for further clarifications or ignore that. I don't see any problem. Of course if you don't like my answer can downvote it and/or vote to delete it. I must accept that. Those are the rules here. Thanks again! Bye
    – gimusi
    Sep 5 at 21:56


















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote













We are looking for the set of all points $(x,y,z)$ which satisfy the following equation



$$x+2y+3z=0$$



and we can easily show, by the definition, that the set is a subspace of $mathbbR^3$.



To find a basis of the subspace observe that we have 3 variable and only one equation therefore we can set any 2 variables free and determine the third as for example



$$y=s quad z=t implies x=-2s-3t$$



therefore the subspace can be written as



$$beginbmatrixx\y\zendbmatrix=sbeginbmatrix-2\1\0endbmatrix+tbeginbmatrix-3\0\1endbmatrix$$



therefore since the subspace is spanned by two linearly independent vectors, by definition, we have that the dimension is $2$, the given equation indeed represents a plane.



Therefore with reference to you questions



  • yes the way you follows show that the two vectors are linearly
    independent, that is by definition $c_1v_1+c_2v_2=0 iff c_1=c_2=0$;
    in that case we don't need to check that directly since these two vectors have
    been obtained in such way to be linearly independent; indeed they are
    in the form $(a,1,0)$ and $(b,0,1)$ and therefore by linear
    combination we can't never reduce to $(0,0,0)$;

  • $2$ dimensional means that the subspace is spanned by $2$ linearly independent vectors (revise the definition of basis and dimension) and since $mathbbR^3$ is spanned by the three linearly independent vectors $e_1=(1,0,0)$, $e_2=(0,1,0)$ and $e_3=(0,0,1)$ its dimension is $3$ of course; the same argument applies to $mathbbR^n$ which has dimension $n$.





share|cite|improve this answer


















  • 3




    Doesn't this repeat the explanation given in the text? To answer, please don't summarize the explanation that the user clearly doesn't understand.
    – amWhy
    Sep 5 at 21:45










  • @amWhy I like to write the full explanation to better present the concepts. I'm awaiting for a reply form the OP in order to review if necessary the answer. Thanks for your suggestion.
    – gimusi
    Sep 5 at 21:47







  • 3




    What you wrote is merely a paraphrase of the very text the asker seems to not understand (and you failed to cite the text as your source of paraphrasing). So how about vary the words, provide another example, explain what is meant by "free variables"... don't just spit out exactly the work that the asker is confused with. So no, you didn't better present anything than the text did, and the text didn't work for the OP. So, are you simply going to keep spitting out the order and presentation of the text, or try to actually test your ability to teach?
    – amWhy
    Sep 5 at 21:52







  • 2




    @amWhy I'm simply trying to help a person to understand the concepts and also to understand better the concepts by myself. If it is merely a repetition of the OP he can ask for further clarifications or ignore that. I don't see any problem. Of course if you don't like my answer can downvote it and/or vote to delete it. I must accept that. Those are the rules here. Thanks again! Bye
    – gimusi
    Sep 5 at 21:56















up vote
1
down vote













We are looking for the set of all points $(x,y,z)$ which satisfy the following equation



$$x+2y+3z=0$$



and we can easily show, by the definition, that the set is a subspace of $mathbbR^3$.



To find a basis of the subspace observe that we have 3 variable and only one equation therefore we can set any 2 variables free and determine the third as for example



$$y=s quad z=t implies x=-2s-3t$$



therefore the subspace can be written as



$$beginbmatrixx\y\zendbmatrix=sbeginbmatrix-2\1\0endbmatrix+tbeginbmatrix-3\0\1endbmatrix$$



therefore since the subspace is spanned by two linearly independent vectors, by definition, we have that the dimension is $2$, the given equation indeed represents a plane.



Therefore with reference to you questions



  • yes the way you follows show that the two vectors are linearly
    independent, that is by definition $c_1v_1+c_2v_2=0 iff c_1=c_2=0$;
    in that case we don't need to check that directly since these two vectors have
    been obtained in such way to be linearly independent; indeed they are
    in the form $(a,1,0)$ and $(b,0,1)$ and therefore by linear
    combination we can't never reduce to $(0,0,0)$;

  • $2$ dimensional means that the subspace is spanned by $2$ linearly independent vectors (revise the definition of basis and dimension) and since $mathbbR^3$ is spanned by the three linearly independent vectors $e_1=(1,0,0)$, $e_2=(0,1,0)$ and $e_3=(0,0,1)$ its dimension is $3$ of course; the same argument applies to $mathbbR^n$ which has dimension $n$.





share|cite|improve this answer


















  • 3




    Doesn't this repeat the explanation given in the text? To answer, please don't summarize the explanation that the user clearly doesn't understand.
    – amWhy
    Sep 5 at 21:45










  • @amWhy I like to write the full explanation to better present the concepts. I'm awaiting for a reply form the OP in order to review if necessary the answer. Thanks for your suggestion.
    – gimusi
    Sep 5 at 21:47







  • 3




    What you wrote is merely a paraphrase of the very text the asker seems to not understand (and you failed to cite the text as your source of paraphrasing). So how about vary the words, provide another example, explain what is meant by "free variables"... don't just spit out exactly the work that the asker is confused with. So no, you didn't better present anything than the text did, and the text didn't work for the OP. So, are you simply going to keep spitting out the order and presentation of the text, or try to actually test your ability to teach?
    – amWhy
    Sep 5 at 21:52







  • 2




    @amWhy I'm simply trying to help a person to understand the concepts and also to understand better the concepts by myself. If it is merely a repetition of the OP he can ask for further clarifications or ignore that. I don't see any problem. Of course if you don't like my answer can downvote it and/or vote to delete it. I must accept that. Those are the rules here. Thanks again! Bye
    – gimusi
    Sep 5 at 21:56













up vote
1
down vote










up vote
1
down vote









We are looking for the set of all points $(x,y,z)$ which satisfy the following equation



$$x+2y+3z=0$$



and we can easily show, by the definition, that the set is a subspace of $mathbbR^3$.



To find a basis of the subspace observe that we have 3 variable and only one equation therefore we can set any 2 variables free and determine the third as for example



$$y=s quad z=t implies x=-2s-3t$$



therefore the subspace can be written as



$$beginbmatrixx\y\zendbmatrix=sbeginbmatrix-2\1\0endbmatrix+tbeginbmatrix-3\0\1endbmatrix$$



therefore since the subspace is spanned by two linearly independent vectors, by definition, we have that the dimension is $2$, the given equation indeed represents a plane.



Therefore with reference to you questions



  • yes the way you follows show that the two vectors are linearly
    independent, that is by definition $c_1v_1+c_2v_2=0 iff c_1=c_2=0$;
    in that case we don't need to check that directly since these two vectors have
    been obtained in such way to be linearly independent; indeed they are
    in the form $(a,1,0)$ and $(b,0,1)$ and therefore by linear
    combination we can't never reduce to $(0,0,0)$;

  • $2$ dimensional means that the subspace is spanned by $2$ linearly independent vectors (revise the definition of basis and dimension) and since $mathbbR^3$ is spanned by the three linearly independent vectors $e_1=(1,0,0)$, $e_2=(0,1,0)$ and $e_3=(0,0,1)$ its dimension is $3$ of course; the same argument applies to $mathbbR^n$ which has dimension $n$.





share|cite|improve this answer














We are looking for the set of all points $(x,y,z)$ which satisfy the following equation



$$x+2y+3z=0$$



and we can easily show, by the definition, that the set is a subspace of $mathbbR^3$.



To find a basis of the subspace observe that we have 3 variable and only one equation therefore we can set any 2 variables free and determine the third as for example



$$y=s quad z=t implies x=-2s-3t$$



therefore the subspace can be written as



$$beginbmatrixx\y\zendbmatrix=sbeginbmatrix-2\1\0endbmatrix+tbeginbmatrix-3\0\1endbmatrix$$



therefore since the subspace is spanned by two linearly independent vectors, by definition, we have that the dimension is $2$, the given equation indeed represents a plane.



Therefore with reference to you questions



  • yes the way you follows show that the two vectors are linearly
    independent, that is by definition $c_1v_1+c_2v_2=0 iff c_1=c_2=0$;
    in that case we don't need to check that directly since these two vectors have
    been obtained in such way to be linearly independent; indeed they are
    in the form $(a,1,0)$ and $(b,0,1)$ and therefore by linear
    combination we can't never reduce to $(0,0,0)$;

  • $2$ dimensional means that the subspace is spanned by $2$ linearly independent vectors (revise the definition of basis and dimension) and since $mathbbR^3$ is spanned by the three linearly independent vectors $e_1=(1,0,0)$, $e_2=(0,1,0)$ and $e_3=(0,0,1)$ its dimension is $3$ of course; the same argument applies to $mathbbR^n$ which has dimension $n$.






share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Sep 6 at 6:06

























answered Sep 5 at 21:38









gimusi

73.6k73889




73.6k73889







  • 3




    Doesn't this repeat the explanation given in the text? To answer, please don't summarize the explanation that the user clearly doesn't understand.
    – amWhy
    Sep 5 at 21:45










  • @amWhy I like to write the full explanation to better present the concepts. I'm awaiting for a reply form the OP in order to review if necessary the answer. Thanks for your suggestion.
    – gimusi
    Sep 5 at 21:47







  • 3




    What you wrote is merely a paraphrase of the very text the asker seems to not understand (and you failed to cite the text as your source of paraphrasing). So how about vary the words, provide another example, explain what is meant by "free variables"... don't just spit out exactly the work that the asker is confused with. So no, you didn't better present anything than the text did, and the text didn't work for the OP. So, are you simply going to keep spitting out the order and presentation of the text, or try to actually test your ability to teach?
    – amWhy
    Sep 5 at 21:52







  • 2




    @amWhy I'm simply trying to help a person to understand the concepts and also to understand better the concepts by myself. If it is merely a repetition of the OP he can ask for further clarifications or ignore that. I don't see any problem. Of course if you don't like my answer can downvote it and/or vote to delete it. I must accept that. Those are the rules here. Thanks again! Bye
    – gimusi
    Sep 5 at 21:56













  • 3




    Doesn't this repeat the explanation given in the text? To answer, please don't summarize the explanation that the user clearly doesn't understand.
    – amWhy
    Sep 5 at 21:45










  • @amWhy I like to write the full explanation to better present the concepts. I'm awaiting for a reply form the OP in order to review if necessary the answer. Thanks for your suggestion.
    – gimusi
    Sep 5 at 21:47







  • 3




    What you wrote is merely a paraphrase of the very text the asker seems to not understand (and you failed to cite the text as your source of paraphrasing). So how about vary the words, provide another example, explain what is meant by "free variables"... don't just spit out exactly the work that the asker is confused with. So no, you didn't better present anything than the text did, and the text didn't work for the OP. So, are you simply going to keep spitting out the order and presentation of the text, or try to actually test your ability to teach?
    – amWhy
    Sep 5 at 21:52







  • 2




    @amWhy I'm simply trying to help a person to understand the concepts and also to understand better the concepts by myself. If it is merely a repetition of the OP he can ask for further clarifications or ignore that. I don't see any problem. Of course if you don't like my answer can downvote it and/or vote to delete it. I must accept that. Those are the rules here. Thanks again! Bye
    – gimusi
    Sep 5 at 21:56








3




3




Doesn't this repeat the explanation given in the text? To answer, please don't summarize the explanation that the user clearly doesn't understand.
– amWhy
Sep 5 at 21:45




Doesn't this repeat the explanation given in the text? To answer, please don't summarize the explanation that the user clearly doesn't understand.
– amWhy
Sep 5 at 21:45












@amWhy I like to write the full explanation to better present the concepts. I'm awaiting for a reply form the OP in order to review if necessary the answer. Thanks for your suggestion.
– gimusi
Sep 5 at 21:47





@amWhy I like to write the full explanation to better present the concepts. I'm awaiting for a reply form the OP in order to review if necessary the answer. Thanks for your suggestion.
– gimusi
Sep 5 at 21:47





3




3




What you wrote is merely a paraphrase of the very text the asker seems to not understand (and you failed to cite the text as your source of paraphrasing). So how about vary the words, provide another example, explain what is meant by "free variables"... don't just spit out exactly the work that the asker is confused with. So no, you didn't better present anything than the text did, and the text didn't work for the OP. So, are you simply going to keep spitting out the order and presentation of the text, or try to actually test your ability to teach?
– amWhy
Sep 5 at 21:52





What you wrote is merely a paraphrase of the very text the asker seems to not understand (and you failed to cite the text as your source of paraphrasing). So how about vary the words, provide another example, explain what is meant by "free variables"... don't just spit out exactly the work that the asker is confused with. So no, you didn't better present anything than the text did, and the text didn't work for the OP. So, are you simply going to keep spitting out the order and presentation of the text, or try to actually test your ability to teach?
– amWhy
Sep 5 at 21:52





2




2




@amWhy I'm simply trying to help a person to understand the concepts and also to understand better the concepts by myself. If it is merely a repetition of the OP he can ask for further clarifications or ignore that. I don't see any problem. Of course if you don't like my answer can downvote it and/or vote to delete it. I must accept that. Those are the rules here. Thanks again! Bye
– gimusi
Sep 5 at 21:56





@amWhy I'm simply trying to help a person to understand the concepts and also to understand better the concepts by myself. If it is merely a repetition of the OP he can ask for further clarifications or ignore that. I don't see any problem. Of course if you don't like my answer can downvote it and/or vote to delete it. I must accept that. Those are the rules here. Thanks again! Bye
– gimusi
Sep 5 at 21:56



這個網誌中的熱門文章

Is there any way to eliminate the singular point to solve this integral by hand or by approximations?

Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

Carbon dioxide