Basic $theta$-function identity proof

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












For the $theta$-function $$theta (z) = sum_n in mathbbz q^n^2e^2pi inz,$$
for $q$ given by $e^pi itau$ for some $tau in mathbbC$ with $Im(tau) > 0$, suppose we've proved the results $theta(z+1) = theta (z)$ and $theta(z+tau)=q^-1e^-2pi iztheta(z)$ for any $z in mathbbC$. Is it possible to prove that $$theta(z+tau^*) = -e^-2pi iztheta(tau^* - z)$$ for any $z in mathbbC$ where $tau^* = frac1+tau2$? I'm assuming you can use a trick where you change $n$ to $n-1$ or $-n$ in one of the sums to get the other, but I haven't been able to puzzle out the details yet and there's probably a quick proof out there.



I mentioned the earlier two identities because they're clearly similar, but it's hard to see how to apply them when we have a fraction in the argument and not an ordinary linear combination of $1$ and $tau$. Any help would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    For the $theta$-function $$theta (z) = sum_n in mathbbz q^n^2e^2pi inz,$$
    for $q$ given by $e^pi itau$ for some $tau in mathbbC$ with $Im(tau) > 0$, suppose we've proved the results $theta(z+1) = theta (z)$ and $theta(z+tau)=q^-1e^-2pi iztheta(z)$ for any $z in mathbbC$. Is it possible to prove that $$theta(z+tau^*) = -e^-2pi iztheta(tau^* - z)$$ for any $z in mathbbC$ where $tau^* = frac1+tau2$? I'm assuming you can use a trick where you change $n$ to $n-1$ or $-n$ in one of the sums to get the other, but I haven't been able to puzzle out the details yet and there's probably a quick proof out there.



    I mentioned the earlier two identities because they're clearly similar, but it's hard to see how to apply them when we have a fraction in the argument and not an ordinary linear combination of $1$ and $tau$. Any help would be appreciated.










    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      For the $theta$-function $$theta (z) = sum_n in mathbbz q^n^2e^2pi inz,$$
      for $q$ given by $e^pi itau$ for some $tau in mathbbC$ with $Im(tau) > 0$, suppose we've proved the results $theta(z+1) = theta (z)$ and $theta(z+tau)=q^-1e^-2pi iztheta(z)$ for any $z in mathbbC$. Is it possible to prove that $$theta(z+tau^*) = -e^-2pi iztheta(tau^* - z)$$ for any $z in mathbbC$ where $tau^* = frac1+tau2$? I'm assuming you can use a trick where you change $n$ to $n-1$ or $-n$ in one of the sums to get the other, but I haven't been able to puzzle out the details yet and there's probably a quick proof out there.



      I mentioned the earlier two identities because they're clearly similar, but it's hard to see how to apply them when we have a fraction in the argument and not an ordinary linear combination of $1$ and $tau$. Any help would be appreciated.










      share|cite|improve this question













      For the $theta$-function $$theta (z) = sum_n in mathbbz q^n^2e^2pi inz,$$
      for $q$ given by $e^pi itau$ for some $tau in mathbbC$ with $Im(tau) > 0$, suppose we've proved the results $theta(z+1) = theta (z)$ and $theta(z+tau)=q^-1e^-2pi iztheta(z)$ for any $z in mathbbC$. Is it possible to prove that $$theta(z+tau^*) = -e^-2pi iztheta(tau^* - z)$$ for any $z in mathbbC$ where $tau^* = frac1+tau2$? I'm assuming you can use a trick where you change $n$ to $n-1$ or $-n$ in one of the sums to get the other, but I haven't been able to puzzle out the details yet and there's probably a quick proof out there.



      I mentioned the earlier two identities because they're clearly similar, but it's hard to see how to apply them when we have a fraction in the argument and not an ordinary linear combination of $1$ and $tau$. Any help would be appreciated.







      complex-analysis theta-functions






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Feb 19 at 14:33









      SPS

      17611




      17611




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          If you write out the expansion of $theta(z+tau^*)$ you have



          $$ theta(z+tau^*) = sum_n=-infty^+infty(-1)^n q^n(n+1) e^2pi i n z$$



          If you write out $-e^-2pi i z theta(tau^* -z)$ you have



          $$-e^-2pi i z theta(tau^* -z) = -e^-2pi i z sum_n=-infty^+infty (-1)^n q^n^2 + n e^-2pi i n z$$



          If take this and change the summation variable $nrightarrow -n$, you have



          $$ -e^-2pi i z theta(tau^* -z) = -e^-2pi i z sum_n=-infty^+infty (-1)^n q^n^2 -n e^2pi i n z = sum_n=-infty^+infty (-1)^n-1 q^n^2 -n e^2pi i z (n-1)$$



          Now if we make the change of variable $nrightarrow m+1$ we have



          $$sum_n=-infty^+infty (-1)^n-1 q^n^2 -n e^2pi i z (n-1) = sum_m=-infty^+infty (-1)^m q^m(m+1)e^2pi i m z$$



          and so the two expressions are equal.



          I hope this answers your question.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2657049%2fbasic-theta-function-identity-proof%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            0
            down vote













            If you write out the expansion of $theta(z+tau^*)$ you have



            $$ theta(z+tau^*) = sum_n=-infty^+infty(-1)^n q^n(n+1) e^2pi i n z$$



            If you write out $-e^-2pi i z theta(tau^* -z)$ you have



            $$-e^-2pi i z theta(tau^* -z) = -e^-2pi i z sum_n=-infty^+infty (-1)^n q^n^2 + n e^-2pi i n z$$



            If take this and change the summation variable $nrightarrow -n$, you have



            $$ -e^-2pi i z theta(tau^* -z) = -e^-2pi i z sum_n=-infty^+infty (-1)^n q^n^2 -n e^2pi i n z = sum_n=-infty^+infty (-1)^n-1 q^n^2 -n e^2pi i z (n-1)$$



            Now if we make the change of variable $nrightarrow m+1$ we have



            $$sum_n=-infty^+infty (-1)^n-1 q^n^2 -n e^2pi i z (n-1) = sum_m=-infty^+infty (-1)^m q^m(m+1)e^2pi i m z$$



            and so the two expressions are equal.



            I hope this answers your question.






            share|cite|improve this answer
























              up vote
              0
              down vote













              If you write out the expansion of $theta(z+tau^*)$ you have



              $$ theta(z+tau^*) = sum_n=-infty^+infty(-1)^n q^n(n+1) e^2pi i n z$$



              If you write out $-e^-2pi i z theta(tau^* -z)$ you have



              $$-e^-2pi i z theta(tau^* -z) = -e^-2pi i z sum_n=-infty^+infty (-1)^n q^n^2 + n e^-2pi i n z$$



              If take this and change the summation variable $nrightarrow -n$, you have



              $$ -e^-2pi i z theta(tau^* -z) = -e^-2pi i z sum_n=-infty^+infty (-1)^n q^n^2 -n e^2pi i n z = sum_n=-infty^+infty (-1)^n-1 q^n^2 -n e^2pi i z (n-1)$$



              Now if we make the change of variable $nrightarrow m+1$ we have



              $$sum_n=-infty^+infty (-1)^n-1 q^n^2 -n e^2pi i z (n-1) = sum_m=-infty^+infty (-1)^m q^m(m+1)e^2pi i m z$$



              and so the two expressions are equal.



              I hope this answers your question.






              share|cite|improve this answer






















                up vote
                0
                down vote










                up vote
                0
                down vote









                If you write out the expansion of $theta(z+tau^*)$ you have



                $$ theta(z+tau^*) = sum_n=-infty^+infty(-1)^n q^n(n+1) e^2pi i n z$$



                If you write out $-e^-2pi i z theta(tau^* -z)$ you have



                $$-e^-2pi i z theta(tau^* -z) = -e^-2pi i z sum_n=-infty^+infty (-1)^n q^n^2 + n e^-2pi i n z$$



                If take this and change the summation variable $nrightarrow -n$, you have



                $$ -e^-2pi i z theta(tau^* -z) = -e^-2pi i z sum_n=-infty^+infty (-1)^n q^n^2 -n e^2pi i n z = sum_n=-infty^+infty (-1)^n-1 q^n^2 -n e^2pi i z (n-1)$$



                Now if we make the change of variable $nrightarrow m+1$ we have



                $$sum_n=-infty^+infty (-1)^n-1 q^n^2 -n e^2pi i z (n-1) = sum_m=-infty^+infty (-1)^m q^m(m+1)e^2pi i m z$$



                and so the two expressions are equal.



                I hope this answers your question.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                If you write out the expansion of $theta(z+tau^*)$ you have



                $$ theta(z+tau^*) = sum_n=-infty^+infty(-1)^n q^n(n+1) e^2pi i n z$$



                If you write out $-e^-2pi i z theta(tau^* -z)$ you have



                $$-e^-2pi i z theta(tau^* -z) = -e^-2pi i z sum_n=-infty^+infty (-1)^n q^n^2 + n e^-2pi i n z$$



                If take this and change the summation variable $nrightarrow -n$, you have



                $$ -e^-2pi i z theta(tau^* -z) = -e^-2pi i z sum_n=-infty^+infty (-1)^n q^n^2 -n e^2pi i n z = sum_n=-infty^+infty (-1)^n-1 q^n^2 -n e^2pi i z (n-1)$$



                Now if we make the change of variable $nrightarrow m+1$ we have



                $$sum_n=-infty^+infty (-1)^n-1 q^n^2 -n e^2pi i z (n-1) = sum_m=-infty^+infty (-1)^m q^m(m+1)e^2pi i m z$$



                and so the two expressions are equal.



                I hope this answers your question.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Sep 6 at 9:42









                Aran

                514




                514



























                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2657049%2fbasic-theta-function-identity-proof%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    這個網誌中的熱門文章

                    Is there any way to eliminate the singular point to solve this integral by hand or by approximations?

                    Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

                    Carbon dioxide