Dual of cocyclic module is cyclic

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












I am working on a paper, which states that the dual of a finite dimensional cocyclic module is cyclic. I tried to write down a proof, but I failed and I do not know if this is true in full generality or of it is true just in my case.



Let $A$ be a complex Hopf algebra and $M$ a finite $mathbbC$-dimensional cocyclic $A$-module with cocyclic vector $m in Msetminus lbrace 0 rbrace$, i.e. every nontrivial submodule $U subset M$ contains $m$. Let $M^* = operatornameHom(M,mathbbC)$ be the dual module. The statement is, that $M^*$ is cyclic with cyclic vector $m'$ corresponding to $m$.



What I tried so far, is the following. Let $e_1, dots, e_n$ be a $mathbbC$-basis of $M$ and let $delta_1, dots, delta_n$ be the dual basis of $M^*$, i.e. $delta_i(e_j) = delta_ij$.



We can assume that $m = e_1$, in particular $m' = delta_1$. Now since $m = e_1$ is cocyclic, there exists for every $e_i$ an element $a_i in A$ such that $a_ie_i = e_1$. To show that $M^*$ is cyclic with cyclic vector $delta_1$, it suffices to find elements $tilde a_i$ such that $tilde a_i delta_1 = delta_i$ for every $1 le i le n$.



The first obvious idea is to try to act with $a_i$ on $delta_1$ and look what happens. It is clear that
beginalign*
(a_i delta_1)(e_i) = delta_1(a_i e_i) = delta_1(e_1) = 1,
endalign*
but if we write $a_i e_j = sum_k a_k^ij e_k$, we have
beginalign*
(a_i delta_1)(e_j) = delta_1(a_i e_j) = a_1^ij
endalign*
which a priori can be nonzero.



I tried to correct the elements $a_i$ to make $a_1^ij$ be $0$, but this only works if $n = 2$, and moreover I think, that there should be a more intrinsic reason why the dual of a cocyclic is cyclic.



In the paper I am working on, my algebra is the universal enveloping algebra $U(mathfrakg otimes mathbbC[t])$ of the current algebra, where $mathfrakg$ is a semisimple finite dimensional Lie algebra. My module $M$ is in fact graded, but I do not think, that this is important.










share|cite|improve this question



























    up vote
    3
    down vote

    favorite












    I am working on a paper, which states that the dual of a finite dimensional cocyclic module is cyclic. I tried to write down a proof, but I failed and I do not know if this is true in full generality or of it is true just in my case.



    Let $A$ be a complex Hopf algebra and $M$ a finite $mathbbC$-dimensional cocyclic $A$-module with cocyclic vector $m in Msetminus lbrace 0 rbrace$, i.e. every nontrivial submodule $U subset M$ contains $m$. Let $M^* = operatornameHom(M,mathbbC)$ be the dual module. The statement is, that $M^*$ is cyclic with cyclic vector $m'$ corresponding to $m$.



    What I tried so far, is the following. Let $e_1, dots, e_n$ be a $mathbbC$-basis of $M$ and let $delta_1, dots, delta_n$ be the dual basis of $M^*$, i.e. $delta_i(e_j) = delta_ij$.



    We can assume that $m = e_1$, in particular $m' = delta_1$. Now since $m = e_1$ is cocyclic, there exists for every $e_i$ an element $a_i in A$ such that $a_ie_i = e_1$. To show that $M^*$ is cyclic with cyclic vector $delta_1$, it suffices to find elements $tilde a_i$ such that $tilde a_i delta_1 = delta_i$ for every $1 le i le n$.



    The first obvious idea is to try to act with $a_i$ on $delta_1$ and look what happens. It is clear that
    beginalign*
    (a_i delta_1)(e_i) = delta_1(a_i e_i) = delta_1(e_1) = 1,
    endalign*
    but if we write $a_i e_j = sum_k a_k^ij e_k$, we have
    beginalign*
    (a_i delta_1)(e_j) = delta_1(a_i e_j) = a_1^ij
    endalign*
    which a priori can be nonzero.



    I tried to correct the elements $a_i$ to make $a_1^ij$ be $0$, but this only works if $n = 2$, and moreover I think, that there should be a more intrinsic reason why the dual of a cocyclic is cyclic.



    In the paper I am working on, my algebra is the universal enveloping algebra $U(mathfrakg otimes mathbbC[t])$ of the current algebra, where $mathfrakg$ is a semisimple finite dimensional Lie algebra. My module $M$ is in fact graded, but I do not think, that this is important.










    share|cite|improve this question

























      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite











      I am working on a paper, which states that the dual of a finite dimensional cocyclic module is cyclic. I tried to write down a proof, but I failed and I do not know if this is true in full generality or of it is true just in my case.



      Let $A$ be a complex Hopf algebra and $M$ a finite $mathbbC$-dimensional cocyclic $A$-module with cocyclic vector $m in Msetminus lbrace 0 rbrace$, i.e. every nontrivial submodule $U subset M$ contains $m$. Let $M^* = operatornameHom(M,mathbbC)$ be the dual module. The statement is, that $M^*$ is cyclic with cyclic vector $m'$ corresponding to $m$.



      What I tried so far, is the following. Let $e_1, dots, e_n$ be a $mathbbC$-basis of $M$ and let $delta_1, dots, delta_n$ be the dual basis of $M^*$, i.e. $delta_i(e_j) = delta_ij$.



      We can assume that $m = e_1$, in particular $m' = delta_1$. Now since $m = e_1$ is cocyclic, there exists for every $e_i$ an element $a_i in A$ such that $a_ie_i = e_1$. To show that $M^*$ is cyclic with cyclic vector $delta_1$, it suffices to find elements $tilde a_i$ such that $tilde a_i delta_1 = delta_i$ for every $1 le i le n$.



      The first obvious idea is to try to act with $a_i$ on $delta_1$ and look what happens. It is clear that
      beginalign*
      (a_i delta_1)(e_i) = delta_1(a_i e_i) = delta_1(e_1) = 1,
      endalign*
      but if we write $a_i e_j = sum_k a_k^ij e_k$, we have
      beginalign*
      (a_i delta_1)(e_j) = delta_1(a_i e_j) = a_1^ij
      endalign*
      which a priori can be nonzero.



      I tried to correct the elements $a_i$ to make $a_1^ij$ be $0$, but this only works if $n = 2$, and moreover I think, that there should be a more intrinsic reason why the dual of a cocyclic is cyclic.



      In the paper I am working on, my algebra is the universal enveloping algebra $U(mathfrakg otimes mathbbC[t])$ of the current algebra, where $mathfrakg$ is a semisimple finite dimensional Lie algebra. My module $M$ is in fact graded, but I do not think, that this is important.










      share|cite|improve this question















      I am working on a paper, which states that the dual of a finite dimensional cocyclic module is cyclic. I tried to write down a proof, but I failed and I do not know if this is true in full generality or of it is true just in my case.



      Let $A$ be a complex Hopf algebra and $M$ a finite $mathbbC$-dimensional cocyclic $A$-module with cocyclic vector $m in Msetminus lbrace 0 rbrace$, i.e. every nontrivial submodule $U subset M$ contains $m$. Let $M^* = operatornameHom(M,mathbbC)$ be the dual module. The statement is, that $M^*$ is cyclic with cyclic vector $m'$ corresponding to $m$.



      What I tried so far, is the following. Let $e_1, dots, e_n$ be a $mathbbC$-basis of $M$ and let $delta_1, dots, delta_n$ be the dual basis of $M^*$, i.e. $delta_i(e_j) = delta_ij$.



      We can assume that $m = e_1$, in particular $m' = delta_1$. Now since $m = e_1$ is cocyclic, there exists for every $e_i$ an element $a_i in A$ such that $a_ie_i = e_1$. To show that $M^*$ is cyclic with cyclic vector $delta_1$, it suffices to find elements $tilde a_i$ such that $tilde a_i delta_1 = delta_i$ for every $1 le i le n$.



      The first obvious idea is to try to act with $a_i$ on $delta_1$ and look what happens. It is clear that
      beginalign*
      (a_i delta_1)(e_i) = delta_1(a_i e_i) = delta_1(e_1) = 1,
      endalign*
      but if we write $a_i e_j = sum_k a_k^ij e_k$, we have
      beginalign*
      (a_i delta_1)(e_j) = delta_1(a_i e_j) = a_1^ij
      endalign*
      which a priori can be nonzero.



      I tried to correct the elements $a_i$ to make $a_1^ij$ be $0$, but this only works if $n = 2$, and moreover I think, that there should be a more intrinsic reason why the dual of a cocyclic is cyclic.



      In the paper I am working on, my algebra is the universal enveloping algebra $U(mathfrakg otimes mathbbC[t])$ of the current algebra, where $mathfrakg$ is a semisimple finite dimensional Lie algebra. My module $M$ is in fact graded, but I do not think, that this is important.







      combinatorics representation-theory lie-algebras dual-spaces hopf-algebras






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Sep 7 at 9:42

























      asked Sep 6 at 10:03









      jakyla85

      183




      183




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted










          It's not true that cyclic or cocyclic modules have to be simple (e.g. Verma modules are cyclic but not always simple).



          A module is cyclic if (not only if) it has unique maximal proper submodule, and a cocyclic module is one with a unique minimal nonzero submodule ($Am$, in your notation - let's call it $S$).



          To prove $M^*$ is cyclic, we show it has a unique maximal submodule. Consider the proper submodule $S^perp=fin M^* : f(S)=0 leqslant M^*$ which I claim is unique maximal. To see this, let $T < M^*$. Then $0 neq T^o = x in M : forall t in T, t(x)=0 leqslant M$, so $S leqslant T^o$, so $T^o perp leqslant S^perp$, so $T leqslant S^perp$ as $T leqslant T^o perp$. The only reason you need Hopf algebras is so that all of these things are submodules.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • True, cyclic does not imply simple. I edited the original post. What is $S^perp$ in your notation?
            – jakyla85
            Sep 7 at 9:42










          • Just what it means for vector spaces. I'll edit...
            – m_t_
            Sep 7 at 10:22






          • 1




            And besides, $mathbbZ/6mathbbZ$ is cyclic but has two maximal proper submodules...
            – jakyla85
            Sep 7 at 10:42











          • My mistake - I should have said that a module is cyclic if it has a unique maximal submodule
            – m_t_
            Sep 7 at 11:19






          • 1




            Thanks, I missed the part with the finite generation.
            – jakyla85
            Sep 7 at 12:17










          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2907298%2fdual-of-cocyclic-module-is-cyclic%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted










          It's not true that cyclic or cocyclic modules have to be simple (e.g. Verma modules are cyclic but not always simple).



          A module is cyclic if (not only if) it has unique maximal proper submodule, and a cocyclic module is one with a unique minimal nonzero submodule ($Am$, in your notation - let's call it $S$).



          To prove $M^*$ is cyclic, we show it has a unique maximal submodule. Consider the proper submodule $S^perp=fin M^* : f(S)=0 leqslant M^*$ which I claim is unique maximal. To see this, let $T < M^*$. Then $0 neq T^o = x in M : forall t in T, t(x)=0 leqslant M$, so $S leqslant T^o$, so $T^o perp leqslant S^perp$, so $T leqslant S^perp$ as $T leqslant T^o perp$. The only reason you need Hopf algebras is so that all of these things are submodules.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • True, cyclic does not imply simple. I edited the original post. What is $S^perp$ in your notation?
            – jakyla85
            Sep 7 at 9:42










          • Just what it means for vector spaces. I'll edit...
            – m_t_
            Sep 7 at 10:22






          • 1




            And besides, $mathbbZ/6mathbbZ$ is cyclic but has two maximal proper submodules...
            – jakyla85
            Sep 7 at 10:42











          • My mistake - I should have said that a module is cyclic if it has a unique maximal submodule
            – m_t_
            Sep 7 at 11:19






          • 1




            Thanks, I missed the part with the finite generation.
            – jakyla85
            Sep 7 at 12:17














          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted










          It's not true that cyclic or cocyclic modules have to be simple (e.g. Verma modules are cyclic but not always simple).



          A module is cyclic if (not only if) it has unique maximal proper submodule, and a cocyclic module is one with a unique minimal nonzero submodule ($Am$, in your notation - let's call it $S$).



          To prove $M^*$ is cyclic, we show it has a unique maximal submodule. Consider the proper submodule $S^perp=fin M^* : f(S)=0 leqslant M^*$ which I claim is unique maximal. To see this, let $T < M^*$. Then $0 neq T^o = x in M : forall t in T, t(x)=0 leqslant M$, so $S leqslant T^o$, so $T^o perp leqslant S^perp$, so $T leqslant S^perp$ as $T leqslant T^o perp$. The only reason you need Hopf algebras is so that all of these things are submodules.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • True, cyclic does not imply simple. I edited the original post. What is $S^perp$ in your notation?
            – jakyla85
            Sep 7 at 9:42










          • Just what it means for vector spaces. I'll edit...
            – m_t_
            Sep 7 at 10:22






          • 1




            And besides, $mathbbZ/6mathbbZ$ is cyclic but has two maximal proper submodules...
            – jakyla85
            Sep 7 at 10:42











          • My mistake - I should have said that a module is cyclic if it has a unique maximal submodule
            – m_t_
            Sep 7 at 11:19






          • 1




            Thanks, I missed the part with the finite generation.
            – jakyla85
            Sep 7 at 12:17












          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted






          It's not true that cyclic or cocyclic modules have to be simple (e.g. Verma modules are cyclic but not always simple).



          A module is cyclic if (not only if) it has unique maximal proper submodule, and a cocyclic module is one with a unique minimal nonzero submodule ($Am$, in your notation - let's call it $S$).



          To prove $M^*$ is cyclic, we show it has a unique maximal submodule. Consider the proper submodule $S^perp=fin M^* : f(S)=0 leqslant M^*$ which I claim is unique maximal. To see this, let $T < M^*$. Then $0 neq T^o = x in M : forall t in T, t(x)=0 leqslant M$, so $S leqslant T^o$, so $T^o perp leqslant S^perp$, so $T leqslant S^perp$ as $T leqslant T^o perp$. The only reason you need Hopf algebras is so that all of these things are submodules.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          It's not true that cyclic or cocyclic modules have to be simple (e.g. Verma modules are cyclic but not always simple).



          A module is cyclic if (not only if) it has unique maximal proper submodule, and a cocyclic module is one with a unique minimal nonzero submodule ($Am$, in your notation - let's call it $S$).



          To prove $M^*$ is cyclic, we show it has a unique maximal submodule. Consider the proper submodule $S^perp=fin M^* : f(S)=0 leqslant M^*$ which I claim is unique maximal. To see this, let $T < M^*$. Then $0 neq T^o = x in M : forall t in T, t(x)=0 leqslant M$, so $S leqslant T^o$, so $T^o perp leqslant S^perp$, so $T leqslant S^perp$ as $T leqslant T^o perp$. The only reason you need Hopf algebras is so that all of these things are submodules.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Sep 7 at 11:24

























          answered Sep 6 at 14:16









          m_t_

          6,96022244




          6,96022244











          • True, cyclic does not imply simple. I edited the original post. What is $S^perp$ in your notation?
            – jakyla85
            Sep 7 at 9:42










          • Just what it means for vector spaces. I'll edit...
            – m_t_
            Sep 7 at 10:22






          • 1




            And besides, $mathbbZ/6mathbbZ$ is cyclic but has two maximal proper submodules...
            – jakyla85
            Sep 7 at 10:42











          • My mistake - I should have said that a module is cyclic if it has a unique maximal submodule
            – m_t_
            Sep 7 at 11:19






          • 1




            Thanks, I missed the part with the finite generation.
            – jakyla85
            Sep 7 at 12:17
















          • True, cyclic does not imply simple. I edited the original post. What is $S^perp$ in your notation?
            – jakyla85
            Sep 7 at 9:42










          • Just what it means for vector spaces. I'll edit...
            – m_t_
            Sep 7 at 10:22






          • 1




            And besides, $mathbbZ/6mathbbZ$ is cyclic but has two maximal proper submodules...
            – jakyla85
            Sep 7 at 10:42











          • My mistake - I should have said that a module is cyclic if it has a unique maximal submodule
            – m_t_
            Sep 7 at 11:19






          • 1




            Thanks, I missed the part with the finite generation.
            – jakyla85
            Sep 7 at 12:17















          True, cyclic does not imply simple. I edited the original post. What is $S^perp$ in your notation?
          – jakyla85
          Sep 7 at 9:42




          True, cyclic does not imply simple. I edited the original post. What is $S^perp$ in your notation?
          – jakyla85
          Sep 7 at 9:42












          Just what it means for vector spaces. I'll edit...
          – m_t_
          Sep 7 at 10:22




          Just what it means for vector spaces. I'll edit...
          – m_t_
          Sep 7 at 10:22




          1




          1




          And besides, $mathbbZ/6mathbbZ$ is cyclic but has two maximal proper submodules...
          – jakyla85
          Sep 7 at 10:42





          And besides, $mathbbZ/6mathbbZ$ is cyclic but has two maximal proper submodules...
          – jakyla85
          Sep 7 at 10:42













          My mistake - I should have said that a module is cyclic if it has a unique maximal submodule
          – m_t_
          Sep 7 at 11:19




          My mistake - I should have said that a module is cyclic if it has a unique maximal submodule
          – m_t_
          Sep 7 at 11:19




          1




          1




          Thanks, I missed the part with the finite generation.
          – jakyla85
          Sep 7 at 12:17




          Thanks, I missed the part with the finite generation.
          – jakyla85
          Sep 7 at 12:17

















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2907298%2fdual-of-cocyclic-module-is-cyclic%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          Is there any way to eliminate the singular point to solve this integral by hand or by approximations?

          Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

          Carbon dioxide