What can we do with inversive geometry?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I've recently been introduced to inversive geometry. This seems like it would be a very pretty area of study. Many sources that I have found seem a little old, however. I have two related questions:



  1. The wiki page (linked above) suggests that there are various problems in geometry which are known to be solvable using inversive geometry. What are examples of these? I have found one very exciting one explained by Numberphile here. Are there more?


  2. My looking around in various places suggests that inversive geometry is not such an active area of research at the moment. Is this true? Has it been superseded by other geometries, i.e. projective geometry?


  3. Are there any authoritative books on inversive geometry, or any in particular which are known to be a good introduction to the subject?










share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    I've recently been introduced to inversive geometry. This seems like it would be a very pretty area of study. Many sources that I have found seem a little old, however. I have two related questions:



    1. The wiki page (linked above) suggests that there are various problems in geometry which are known to be solvable using inversive geometry. What are examples of these? I have found one very exciting one explained by Numberphile here. Are there more?


    2. My looking around in various places suggests that inversive geometry is not such an active area of research at the moment. Is this true? Has it been superseded by other geometries, i.e. projective geometry?


    3. Are there any authoritative books on inversive geometry, or any in particular which are known to be a good introduction to the subject?










    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      I've recently been introduced to inversive geometry. This seems like it would be a very pretty area of study. Many sources that I have found seem a little old, however. I have two related questions:



      1. The wiki page (linked above) suggests that there are various problems in geometry which are known to be solvable using inversive geometry. What are examples of these? I have found one very exciting one explained by Numberphile here. Are there more?


      2. My looking around in various places suggests that inversive geometry is not such an active area of research at the moment. Is this true? Has it been superseded by other geometries, i.e. projective geometry?


      3. Are there any authoritative books on inversive geometry, or any in particular which are known to be a good introduction to the subject?










      share|cite|improve this question













      I've recently been introduced to inversive geometry. This seems like it would be a very pretty area of study. Many sources that I have found seem a little old, however. I have two related questions:



      1. The wiki page (linked above) suggests that there are various problems in geometry which are known to be solvable using inversive geometry. What are examples of these? I have found one very exciting one explained by Numberphile here. Are there more?


      2. My looking around in various places suggests that inversive geometry is not such an active area of research at the moment. Is this true? Has it been superseded by other geometries, i.e. projective geometry?


      3. Are there any authoritative books on inversive geometry, or any in particular which are known to be a good introduction to the subject?







      soft-question book-recommendation inversive-geometry






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Sep 6 at 8:44









      Matt

      2,281719




      2,281719




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          In my opinion, it has been superseded.



          Recall the idea of the complex plane: that we can view the complex numbers as being arranged in a Euclidean plane, similar to how the real numbers are often thought of as a number line.



          The complex projective numbers are an incredibly important extension of the complex plane, formed by adding a single "point at infinity", usually called $infty$, or sometimes $omega$. (this has nothing to do with the first countable ordinal number) This is similar to the construction of the inversive plane.



          Just like addition, multiplication, and conjugation of complex numbers has geometric interpretations, the reciprocal also has a geometric interpretation:



          • Inversion in the unit circle about the origin is the same as the conjugate reciprocal $z mapsto barz^-1 $

          Of central importance to the geometry of the complex projective numbers is the linear fractional transformations, also known as Möbius transformations. (aside: why does Wikipedia have two separate pages?!?!)



          Linear fractional transformations, together with complex conjugation, subsume the basic geometric operations you'd do in inversive geometry: translations, reflections, rotations, and inversions. Conversely, every linear fractional transformation can be built out of these transformations.



          It is in this form — via the study of linear fractional transformations of complex numbers — that one most typically encounters the ideas and methods of inversive geometry.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • This only applies to 2 dimensions.
            – mr_e_man
            Sep 9 at 14:43










          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2907241%2fwhat-can-we-do-with-inversive-geometry%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          In my opinion, it has been superseded.



          Recall the idea of the complex plane: that we can view the complex numbers as being arranged in a Euclidean plane, similar to how the real numbers are often thought of as a number line.



          The complex projective numbers are an incredibly important extension of the complex plane, formed by adding a single "point at infinity", usually called $infty$, or sometimes $omega$. (this has nothing to do with the first countable ordinal number) This is similar to the construction of the inversive plane.



          Just like addition, multiplication, and conjugation of complex numbers has geometric interpretations, the reciprocal also has a geometric interpretation:



          • Inversion in the unit circle about the origin is the same as the conjugate reciprocal $z mapsto barz^-1 $

          Of central importance to the geometry of the complex projective numbers is the linear fractional transformations, also known as Möbius transformations. (aside: why does Wikipedia have two separate pages?!?!)



          Linear fractional transformations, together with complex conjugation, subsume the basic geometric operations you'd do in inversive geometry: translations, reflections, rotations, and inversions. Conversely, every linear fractional transformation can be built out of these transformations.



          It is in this form — via the study of linear fractional transformations of complex numbers — that one most typically encounters the ideas and methods of inversive geometry.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • This only applies to 2 dimensions.
            – mr_e_man
            Sep 9 at 14:43














          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          In my opinion, it has been superseded.



          Recall the idea of the complex plane: that we can view the complex numbers as being arranged in a Euclidean plane, similar to how the real numbers are often thought of as a number line.



          The complex projective numbers are an incredibly important extension of the complex plane, formed by adding a single "point at infinity", usually called $infty$, or sometimes $omega$. (this has nothing to do with the first countable ordinal number) This is similar to the construction of the inversive plane.



          Just like addition, multiplication, and conjugation of complex numbers has geometric interpretations, the reciprocal also has a geometric interpretation:



          • Inversion in the unit circle about the origin is the same as the conjugate reciprocal $z mapsto barz^-1 $

          Of central importance to the geometry of the complex projective numbers is the linear fractional transformations, also known as Möbius transformations. (aside: why does Wikipedia have two separate pages?!?!)



          Linear fractional transformations, together with complex conjugation, subsume the basic geometric operations you'd do in inversive geometry: translations, reflections, rotations, and inversions. Conversely, every linear fractional transformation can be built out of these transformations.



          It is in this form — via the study of linear fractional transformations of complex numbers — that one most typically encounters the ideas and methods of inversive geometry.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • This only applies to 2 dimensions.
            – mr_e_man
            Sep 9 at 14:43












          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted






          In my opinion, it has been superseded.



          Recall the idea of the complex plane: that we can view the complex numbers as being arranged in a Euclidean plane, similar to how the real numbers are often thought of as a number line.



          The complex projective numbers are an incredibly important extension of the complex plane, formed by adding a single "point at infinity", usually called $infty$, or sometimes $omega$. (this has nothing to do with the first countable ordinal number) This is similar to the construction of the inversive plane.



          Just like addition, multiplication, and conjugation of complex numbers has geometric interpretations, the reciprocal also has a geometric interpretation:



          • Inversion in the unit circle about the origin is the same as the conjugate reciprocal $z mapsto barz^-1 $

          Of central importance to the geometry of the complex projective numbers is the linear fractional transformations, also known as Möbius transformations. (aside: why does Wikipedia have two separate pages?!?!)



          Linear fractional transformations, together with complex conjugation, subsume the basic geometric operations you'd do in inversive geometry: translations, reflections, rotations, and inversions. Conversely, every linear fractional transformation can be built out of these transformations.



          It is in this form — via the study of linear fractional transformations of complex numbers — that one most typically encounters the ideas and methods of inversive geometry.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          In my opinion, it has been superseded.



          Recall the idea of the complex plane: that we can view the complex numbers as being arranged in a Euclidean plane, similar to how the real numbers are often thought of as a number line.



          The complex projective numbers are an incredibly important extension of the complex plane, formed by adding a single "point at infinity", usually called $infty$, or sometimes $omega$. (this has nothing to do with the first countable ordinal number) This is similar to the construction of the inversive plane.



          Just like addition, multiplication, and conjugation of complex numbers has geometric interpretations, the reciprocal also has a geometric interpretation:



          • Inversion in the unit circle about the origin is the same as the conjugate reciprocal $z mapsto barz^-1 $

          Of central importance to the geometry of the complex projective numbers is the linear fractional transformations, also known as Möbius transformations. (aside: why does Wikipedia have two separate pages?!?!)



          Linear fractional transformations, together with complex conjugation, subsume the basic geometric operations you'd do in inversive geometry: translations, reflections, rotations, and inversions. Conversely, every linear fractional transformation can be built out of these transformations.



          It is in this form — via the study of linear fractional transformations of complex numbers — that one most typically encounters the ideas and methods of inversive geometry.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Sep 6 at 9:19

























          answered Sep 6 at 9:06









          Hurkyl

          110k9114257




          110k9114257











          • This only applies to 2 dimensions.
            – mr_e_man
            Sep 9 at 14:43
















          • This only applies to 2 dimensions.
            – mr_e_man
            Sep 9 at 14:43















          This only applies to 2 dimensions.
          – mr_e_man
          Sep 9 at 14:43




          This only applies to 2 dimensions.
          – mr_e_man
          Sep 9 at 14:43

















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2907241%2fwhat-can-we-do-with-inversive-geometry%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          Is there any way to eliminate the singular point to solve this integral by hand or by approximations?

          Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

          Carbon dioxide