Prove that the vertex C of a certain family of equilateral triangles ABC lies on a line

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Let $ABC$ be a given equilateral triangle. From vertex $C$ trace a line $l$ with a fixed angle $alpha$. Now, let $P$ be an arbitrary point on $l$ and construct the equilateral triangle with side $AP$ which has $H$ as its third vertex.



What I want to prove (or know why does it happen) is that the line $overleftrightarrowBH$ is fixed, regardless of the location of point $P$ on $l$. In other words, the intersection Q of line $overleftrightarrowBH$ with the line $l$ is a fixed point. Image for reference:



enter image description here



Another way of seeing this problem is that point $H$ describes a straight line while $P$ moves through $l$.
PS:It seems that angle $BQP$ is of $60°$. I'm lost about what path should I follow for the proof.







share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    Let $ABC$ be a given equilateral triangle. From vertex $C$ trace a line $l$ with a fixed angle $alpha$. Now, let $P$ be an arbitrary point on $l$ and construct the equilateral triangle with side $AP$ which has $H$ as its third vertex.



    What I want to prove (or know why does it happen) is that the line $overleftrightarrowBH$ is fixed, regardless of the location of point $P$ on $l$. In other words, the intersection Q of line $overleftrightarrowBH$ with the line $l$ is a fixed point. Image for reference:



    enter image description here



    Another way of seeing this problem is that point $H$ describes a straight line while $P$ moves through $l$.
    PS:It seems that angle $BQP$ is of $60°$. I'm lost about what path should I follow for the proof.







    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      Let $ABC$ be a given equilateral triangle. From vertex $C$ trace a line $l$ with a fixed angle $alpha$. Now, let $P$ be an arbitrary point on $l$ and construct the equilateral triangle with side $AP$ which has $H$ as its third vertex.



      What I want to prove (or know why does it happen) is that the line $overleftrightarrowBH$ is fixed, regardless of the location of point $P$ on $l$. In other words, the intersection Q of line $overleftrightarrowBH$ with the line $l$ is a fixed point. Image for reference:



      enter image description here



      Another way of seeing this problem is that point $H$ describes a straight line while $P$ moves through $l$.
      PS:It seems that angle $BQP$ is of $60°$. I'm lost about what path should I follow for the proof.







      share|cite|improve this question














      Let $ABC$ be a given equilateral triangle. From vertex $C$ trace a line $l$ with a fixed angle $alpha$. Now, let $P$ be an arbitrary point on $l$ and construct the equilateral triangle with side $AP$ which has $H$ as its third vertex.



      What I want to prove (or know why does it happen) is that the line $overleftrightarrowBH$ is fixed, regardless of the location of point $P$ on $l$. In other words, the intersection Q of line $overleftrightarrowBH$ with the line $l$ is a fixed point. Image for reference:



      enter image description here



      Another way of seeing this problem is that point $H$ describes a straight line while $P$ moves through $l$.
      PS:It seems that angle $BQP$ is of $60°$. I'm lost about what path should I follow for the proof.









      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Aug 26 at 23:36

























      asked Aug 26 at 22:35









      NotAMathematician

      33211




      33211




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Let's look at the geometric transformation in the plane given by the clockwise rotation of 60 degrees in the plan around the point $A$. This transformation is an isometry mapping lines to lines. In particular, it maps the line $l$ to another line $m$ that makes the same angle of 60 degrees with $l$. Since the transformation maps $C$ to $B$ and $C$ is on $l$, so the line $m$ must pass through $B$.






          share|cite|improve this answer



























            up vote
            0
            down vote













            I try to explain it from another angle.



            1) Form the circum-circle of ABC. Let it cut “L” at Q such that ABQC is cyclic with $angle AQB = angle ACB = 60^0$.



            enter image description here



            2) Let P be any point on “L”. Join AP. Locate the point H on QB extended such that $angle APH = 60^0$.



            3) After joining AH, we found that AQPH is also cyclic.



            Note that $angle HAP = angle H(B)QP = angle BAC = 60^0$. This means the triangle APH thus created is equilateral.






            share|cite|improve this answer




















            • Amazing, I wouldn't have thought of that way.
              – NotAMathematician
              Aug 27 at 15:59










            • @NotAMathematician Maybe you can accept it as an answer.
              – Mick
              Aug 28 at 13:15










            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2895598%2fprove-that-the-vertex-c-of-a-certain-family-of-equilateral-triangles-abc-lies-on%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            0
            down vote













            Let's look at the geometric transformation in the plane given by the clockwise rotation of 60 degrees in the plan around the point $A$. This transformation is an isometry mapping lines to lines. In particular, it maps the line $l$ to another line $m$ that makes the same angle of 60 degrees with $l$. Since the transformation maps $C$ to $B$ and $C$ is on $l$, so the line $m$ must pass through $B$.






            share|cite|improve this answer
























              up vote
              0
              down vote













              Let's look at the geometric transformation in the plane given by the clockwise rotation of 60 degrees in the plan around the point $A$. This transformation is an isometry mapping lines to lines. In particular, it maps the line $l$ to another line $m$ that makes the same angle of 60 degrees with $l$. Since the transformation maps $C$ to $B$ and $C$ is on $l$, so the line $m$ must pass through $B$.






              share|cite|improve this answer






















                up vote
                0
                down vote










                up vote
                0
                down vote









                Let's look at the geometric transformation in the plane given by the clockwise rotation of 60 degrees in the plan around the point $A$. This transformation is an isometry mapping lines to lines. In particular, it maps the line $l$ to another line $m$ that makes the same angle of 60 degrees with $l$. Since the transformation maps $C$ to $B$ and $C$ is on $l$, so the line $m$ must pass through $B$.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                Let's look at the geometric transformation in the plane given by the clockwise rotation of 60 degrees in the plan around the point $A$. This transformation is an isometry mapping lines to lines. In particular, it maps the line $l$ to another line $m$ that makes the same angle of 60 degrees with $l$. Since the transformation maps $C$ to $B$ and $C$ is on $l$, so the line $m$ must pass through $B$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Aug 27 at 0:05









                Marco

                1,55917




                1,55917




















                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote













                    I try to explain it from another angle.



                    1) Form the circum-circle of ABC. Let it cut “L” at Q such that ABQC is cyclic with $angle AQB = angle ACB = 60^0$.



                    enter image description here



                    2) Let P be any point on “L”. Join AP. Locate the point H on QB extended such that $angle APH = 60^0$.



                    3) After joining AH, we found that AQPH is also cyclic.



                    Note that $angle HAP = angle H(B)QP = angle BAC = 60^0$. This means the triangle APH thus created is equilateral.






                    share|cite|improve this answer




















                    • Amazing, I wouldn't have thought of that way.
                      – NotAMathematician
                      Aug 27 at 15:59










                    • @NotAMathematician Maybe you can accept it as an answer.
                      – Mick
                      Aug 28 at 13:15














                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote













                    I try to explain it from another angle.



                    1) Form the circum-circle of ABC. Let it cut “L” at Q such that ABQC is cyclic with $angle AQB = angle ACB = 60^0$.



                    enter image description here



                    2) Let P be any point on “L”. Join AP. Locate the point H on QB extended such that $angle APH = 60^0$.



                    3) After joining AH, we found that AQPH is also cyclic.



                    Note that $angle HAP = angle H(B)QP = angle BAC = 60^0$. This means the triangle APH thus created is equilateral.






                    share|cite|improve this answer




















                    • Amazing, I wouldn't have thought of that way.
                      – NotAMathematician
                      Aug 27 at 15:59










                    • @NotAMathematician Maybe you can accept it as an answer.
                      – Mick
                      Aug 28 at 13:15












                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote









                    I try to explain it from another angle.



                    1) Form the circum-circle of ABC. Let it cut “L” at Q such that ABQC is cyclic with $angle AQB = angle ACB = 60^0$.



                    enter image description here



                    2) Let P be any point on “L”. Join AP. Locate the point H on QB extended such that $angle APH = 60^0$.



                    3) After joining AH, we found that AQPH is also cyclic.



                    Note that $angle HAP = angle H(B)QP = angle BAC = 60^0$. This means the triangle APH thus created is equilateral.






                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    I try to explain it from another angle.



                    1) Form the circum-circle of ABC. Let it cut “L” at Q such that ABQC is cyclic with $angle AQB = angle ACB = 60^0$.



                    enter image description here



                    2) Let P be any point on “L”. Join AP. Locate the point H on QB extended such that $angle APH = 60^0$.



                    3) After joining AH, we found that AQPH is also cyclic.



                    Note that $angle HAP = angle H(B)QP = angle BAC = 60^0$. This means the triangle APH thus created is equilateral.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Aug 27 at 13:50









                    Mick

                    11.5k21541




                    11.5k21541











                    • Amazing, I wouldn't have thought of that way.
                      – NotAMathematician
                      Aug 27 at 15:59










                    • @NotAMathematician Maybe you can accept it as an answer.
                      – Mick
                      Aug 28 at 13:15
















                    • Amazing, I wouldn't have thought of that way.
                      – NotAMathematician
                      Aug 27 at 15:59










                    • @NotAMathematician Maybe you can accept it as an answer.
                      – Mick
                      Aug 28 at 13:15















                    Amazing, I wouldn't have thought of that way.
                    – NotAMathematician
                    Aug 27 at 15:59




                    Amazing, I wouldn't have thought of that way.
                    – NotAMathematician
                    Aug 27 at 15:59












                    @NotAMathematician Maybe you can accept it as an answer.
                    – Mick
                    Aug 28 at 13:15




                    @NotAMathematician Maybe you can accept it as an answer.
                    – Mick
                    Aug 28 at 13:15

















                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2895598%2fprove-that-the-vertex-c-of-a-certain-family-of-equilateral-triangles-abc-lies-on%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    這個網誌中的熱門文章

                    Is there any way to eliminate the singular point to solve this integral by hand or by approximations?

                    Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

                    Carbon dioxide