Big O-Notation and lim sup

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












this may sound like a stupid question, so please excuse me for that. From my understanding after quickly reading up on it (only know the definition of general limits before), $limsuplimits_xrightarrowinfty sin(x) = 1$. Because $f in O(g) leftrightarrow limsuplimits_xrightarrowinfty |fracf(x)g(x)| < infty$ I can state that $f(x) = 0.5 in O(sin(x))$.



My problem is when looking at the "regular" Big-O Definition, I am not really sure whether my conclusion $f(x) = 0.5 in O(sin(x))$ is correct as $sin(x)$ oscillates between 0 and 1, thus there is no $c$ for that $0.5 < c cdot sin(x) forall n > n_0$. Those two results contradict and I do not know where my error is...



I would be glad if somebody should tell me where I did something wrong.







share|cite|improve this question
















  • 1




    Your feeling about this seems right. Where did you get the equivalent formulation for $O(g)$? That does not look right.
    – 4-ier
    Aug 26 at 21:57










  • @4-ier I got it from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… (2. row of the table)
    – Maxbit
    Aug 26 at 22:01






  • 6




    Are you sure that $limsuplimits_xrightarrowinfty |frac0.5sin(x)| < infty$?
    – Mjiig
    Aug 26 at 22:01










  • Yup. Completely agree with @Mjiig
    – 4-ier
    Aug 26 at 22:03










  • @Mijig Ohh thank you. I visualized $0.5 / sin(x)$ wrongly in my head. When looking at a plot, of course it's not $< infty$. Thank you!
    – Maxbit
    Aug 26 at 22:06














up vote
3
down vote

favorite












this may sound like a stupid question, so please excuse me for that. From my understanding after quickly reading up on it (only know the definition of general limits before), $limsuplimits_xrightarrowinfty sin(x) = 1$. Because $f in O(g) leftrightarrow limsuplimits_xrightarrowinfty |fracf(x)g(x)| < infty$ I can state that $f(x) = 0.5 in O(sin(x))$.



My problem is when looking at the "regular" Big-O Definition, I am not really sure whether my conclusion $f(x) = 0.5 in O(sin(x))$ is correct as $sin(x)$ oscillates between 0 and 1, thus there is no $c$ for that $0.5 < c cdot sin(x) forall n > n_0$. Those two results contradict and I do not know where my error is...



I would be glad if somebody should tell me where I did something wrong.







share|cite|improve this question
















  • 1




    Your feeling about this seems right. Where did you get the equivalent formulation for $O(g)$? That does not look right.
    – 4-ier
    Aug 26 at 21:57










  • @4-ier I got it from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… (2. row of the table)
    – Maxbit
    Aug 26 at 22:01






  • 6




    Are you sure that $limsuplimits_xrightarrowinfty |frac0.5sin(x)| < infty$?
    – Mjiig
    Aug 26 at 22:01










  • Yup. Completely agree with @Mjiig
    – 4-ier
    Aug 26 at 22:03










  • @Mijig Ohh thank you. I visualized $0.5 / sin(x)$ wrongly in my head. When looking at a plot, of course it's not $< infty$. Thank you!
    – Maxbit
    Aug 26 at 22:06












up vote
3
down vote

favorite









up vote
3
down vote

favorite











this may sound like a stupid question, so please excuse me for that. From my understanding after quickly reading up on it (only know the definition of general limits before), $limsuplimits_xrightarrowinfty sin(x) = 1$. Because $f in O(g) leftrightarrow limsuplimits_xrightarrowinfty |fracf(x)g(x)| < infty$ I can state that $f(x) = 0.5 in O(sin(x))$.



My problem is when looking at the "regular" Big-O Definition, I am not really sure whether my conclusion $f(x) = 0.5 in O(sin(x))$ is correct as $sin(x)$ oscillates between 0 and 1, thus there is no $c$ for that $0.5 < c cdot sin(x) forall n > n_0$. Those two results contradict and I do not know where my error is...



I would be glad if somebody should tell me where I did something wrong.







share|cite|improve this question












this may sound like a stupid question, so please excuse me for that. From my understanding after quickly reading up on it (only know the definition of general limits before), $limsuplimits_xrightarrowinfty sin(x) = 1$. Because $f in O(g) leftrightarrow limsuplimits_xrightarrowinfty |fracf(x)g(x)| < infty$ I can state that $f(x) = 0.5 in O(sin(x))$.



My problem is when looking at the "regular" Big-O Definition, I am not really sure whether my conclusion $f(x) = 0.5 in O(sin(x))$ is correct as $sin(x)$ oscillates between 0 and 1, thus there is no $c$ for that $0.5 < c cdot sin(x) forall n > n_0$. Those two results contradict and I do not know where my error is...



I would be glad if somebody should tell me where I did something wrong.









share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Aug 26 at 21:54









Maxbit

1203




1203







  • 1




    Your feeling about this seems right. Where did you get the equivalent formulation for $O(g)$? That does not look right.
    – 4-ier
    Aug 26 at 21:57










  • @4-ier I got it from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… (2. row of the table)
    – Maxbit
    Aug 26 at 22:01






  • 6




    Are you sure that $limsuplimits_xrightarrowinfty |frac0.5sin(x)| < infty$?
    – Mjiig
    Aug 26 at 22:01










  • Yup. Completely agree with @Mjiig
    – 4-ier
    Aug 26 at 22:03










  • @Mijig Ohh thank you. I visualized $0.5 / sin(x)$ wrongly in my head. When looking at a plot, of course it's not $< infty$. Thank you!
    – Maxbit
    Aug 26 at 22:06












  • 1




    Your feeling about this seems right. Where did you get the equivalent formulation for $O(g)$? That does not look right.
    – 4-ier
    Aug 26 at 21:57










  • @4-ier I got it from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… (2. row of the table)
    – Maxbit
    Aug 26 at 22:01






  • 6




    Are you sure that $limsuplimits_xrightarrowinfty |frac0.5sin(x)| < infty$?
    – Mjiig
    Aug 26 at 22:01










  • Yup. Completely agree with @Mjiig
    – 4-ier
    Aug 26 at 22:03










  • @Mijig Ohh thank you. I visualized $0.5 / sin(x)$ wrongly in my head. When looking at a plot, of course it's not $< infty$. Thank you!
    – Maxbit
    Aug 26 at 22:06







1




1




Your feeling about this seems right. Where did you get the equivalent formulation for $O(g)$? That does not look right.
– 4-ier
Aug 26 at 21:57




Your feeling about this seems right. Where did you get the equivalent formulation for $O(g)$? That does not look right.
– 4-ier
Aug 26 at 21:57












@4-ier I got it from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… (2. row of the table)
– Maxbit
Aug 26 at 22:01




@4-ier I got it from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… (2. row of the table)
– Maxbit
Aug 26 at 22:01




6




6




Are you sure that $limsuplimits_xrightarrowinfty |frac0.5sin(x)| < infty$?
– Mjiig
Aug 26 at 22:01




Are you sure that $limsuplimits_xrightarrowinfty |frac0.5sin(x)| < infty$?
– Mjiig
Aug 26 at 22:01












Yup. Completely agree with @Mjiig
– 4-ier
Aug 26 at 22:03




Yup. Completely agree with @Mjiig
– 4-ier
Aug 26 at 22:03












@Mijig Ohh thank you. I visualized $0.5 / sin(x)$ wrongly in my head. When looking at a plot, of course it's not $< infty$. Thank you!
– Maxbit
Aug 26 at 22:06




@Mijig Ohh thank you. I visualized $0.5 / sin(x)$ wrongly in my head. When looking at a plot, of course it's not $< infty$. Thank you!
– Maxbit
Aug 26 at 22:06















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2895570%2fbig-o-notation-and-lim-sup%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest



































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2895570%2fbig-o-notation-and-lim-sup%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

Is there any way to eliminate the singular point to solve this integral by hand or by approximations?

Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

Carbon dioxide