Evaluating improper double integral with Lebesgue

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Consider the improper double integral
$$ I_textRiemann = int_0^1 int_0^sqrt x frac2xy1-y^4 ; dy ; dx = lim_B to 1^- int_0^B int_0^sqrt x frac2xy1-y^4 ; dy ; dx
.$$
The standard "freshman calculus" solution goes by swapping the order of integration to get $int_0^1 int_y^2^1 frac2xy1-y^4 ; dx ; dy$;
then the inner integral is $fracy1-y^4 int_y^2^1 2x ; dx = fracy1-y^4 left[ x^2 right]^1_y^2 = y$ and the answer is $int_0^1 y ; dy = frac12$. I'm trying to make sense of this rigorously, particularly the bit about swapping the order of integration (which seems to require some sort of Tonelli/Fubini result).



My idea is something like the following: define the double Lebesgue integral
$$I_textLebesgue = int_x in [0,1) int_y in [0,1) mathbf 1(x ge y^2) cdot frac2xy(1-y^4) ; dy ; dx.$$ Then Tonelli's theorem lets us swap the order of summation to get
$$I_textLebesgue = int_y in [0,1) fracy1-y^4 int_x in [0,1) mathbf 1(x ge y^2) cdot 2x ; dx ; dy.$$ Thus the inner integral is the same as the Riemann one $int_y^2^1 2x ; dx = 1 - y^4$, hence $$I_textLebesgue = int_y in [0,1) y ; dy = frac12.$$ However, since the original Riemann integral was improper, I don't really know how to justify the first step (cue $x^-1 sin x$ example).



So I have the following three questions:



  1. Is there some result/theorem that lets me quickly see that $I_textRiemann = I_textLebesgue$? Bonus points for not using nonnegativity of $frac2xy1-y^4$.


  2. Is the calculation of $I_textLebesgue$ correct as written?


  3. Are there other ways to justify the interchange of improper integrals? I'm fine appealing to Lebesgue since Lebesgue integrals are "better-behaved" anyways, but I'm wondering if I've missed something easier.







share|cite|improve this question




















  • $u=y^2$ substitution simplifies it. Make it immediately.
    – herb steinberg
    Aug 26 at 22:02










  • Isn’t nonnegativity the fastest way? Simply apply Tonelli’s theorem.
    – Szeto
    Aug 26 at 22:42














up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Consider the improper double integral
$$ I_textRiemann = int_0^1 int_0^sqrt x frac2xy1-y^4 ; dy ; dx = lim_B to 1^- int_0^B int_0^sqrt x frac2xy1-y^4 ; dy ; dx
.$$
The standard "freshman calculus" solution goes by swapping the order of integration to get $int_0^1 int_y^2^1 frac2xy1-y^4 ; dx ; dy$;
then the inner integral is $fracy1-y^4 int_y^2^1 2x ; dx = fracy1-y^4 left[ x^2 right]^1_y^2 = y$ and the answer is $int_0^1 y ; dy = frac12$. I'm trying to make sense of this rigorously, particularly the bit about swapping the order of integration (which seems to require some sort of Tonelli/Fubini result).



My idea is something like the following: define the double Lebesgue integral
$$I_textLebesgue = int_x in [0,1) int_y in [0,1) mathbf 1(x ge y^2) cdot frac2xy(1-y^4) ; dy ; dx.$$ Then Tonelli's theorem lets us swap the order of summation to get
$$I_textLebesgue = int_y in [0,1) fracy1-y^4 int_x in [0,1) mathbf 1(x ge y^2) cdot 2x ; dx ; dy.$$ Thus the inner integral is the same as the Riemann one $int_y^2^1 2x ; dx = 1 - y^4$, hence $$I_textLebesgue = int_y in [0,1) y ; dy = frac12.$$ However, since the original Riemann integral was improper, I don't really know how to justify the first step (cue $x^-1 sin x$ example).



So I have the following three questions:



  1. Is there some result/theorem that lets me quickly see that $I_textRiemann = I_textLebesgue$? Bonus points for not using nonnegativity of $frac2xy1-y^4$.


  2. Is the calculation of $I_textLebesgue$ correct as written?


  3. Are there other ways to justify the interchange of improper integrals? I'm fine appealing to Lebesgue since Lebesgue integrals are "better-behaved" anyways, but I'm wondering if I've missed something easier.







share|cite|improve this question




















  • $u=y^2$ substitution simplifies it. Make it immediately.
    – herb steinberg
    Aug 26 at 22:02










  • Isn’t nonnegativity the fastest way? Simply apply Tonelli’s theorem.
    – Szeto
    Aug 26 at 22:42












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











Consider the improper double integral
$$ I_textRiemann = int_0^1 int_0^sqrt x frac2xy1-y^4 ; dy ; dx = lim_B to 1^- int_0^B int_0^sqrt x frac2xy1-y^4 ; dy ; dx
.$$
The standard "freshman calculus" solution goes by swapping the order of integration to get $int_0^1 int_y^2^1 frac2xy1-y^4 ; dx ; dy$;
then the inner integral is $fracy1-y^4 int_y^2^1 2x ; dx = fracy1-y^4 left[ x^2 right]^1_y^2 = y$ and the answer is $int_0^1 y ; dy = frac12$. I'm trying to make sense of this rigorously, particularly the bit about swapping the order of integration (which seems to require some sort of Tonelli/Fubini result).



My idea is something like the following: define the double Lebesgue integral
$$I_textLebesgue = int_x in [0,1) int_y in [0,1) mathbf 1(x ge y^2) cdot frac2xy(1-y^4) ; dy ; dx.$$ Then Tonelli's theorem lets us swap the order of summation to get
$$I_textLebesgue = int_y in [0,1) fracy1-y^4 int_x in [0,1) mathbf 1(x ge y^2) cdot 2x ; dx ; dy.$$ Thus the inner integral is the same as the Riemann one $int_y^2^1 2x ; dx = 1 - y^4$, hence $$I_textLebesgue = int_y in [0,1) y ; dy = frac12.$$ However, since the original Riemann integral was improper, I don't really know how to justify the first step (cue $x^-1 sin x$ example).



So I have the following three questions:



  1. Is there some result/theorem that lets me quickly see that $I_textRiemann = I_textLebesgue$? Bonus points for not using nonnegativity of $frac2xy1-y^4$.


  2. Is the calculation of $I_textLebesgue$ correct as written?


  3. Are there other ways to justify the interchange of improper integrals? I'm fine appealing to Lebesgue since Lebesgue integrals are "better-behaved" anyways, but I'm wondering if I've missed something easier.







share|cite|improve this question












Consider the improper double integral
$$ I_textRiemann = int_0^1 int_0^sqrt x frac2xy1-y^4 ; dy ; dx = lim_B to 1^- int_0^B int_0^sqrt x frac2xy1-y^4 ; dy ; dx
.$$
The standard "freshman calculus" solution goes by swapping the order of integration to get $int_0^1 int_y^2^1 frac2xy1-y^4 ; dx ; dy$;
then the inner integral is $fracy1-y^4 int_y^2^1 2x ; dx = fracy1-y^4 left[ x^2 right]^1_y^2 = y$ and the answer is $int_0^1 y ; dy = frac12$. I'm trying to make sense of this rigorously, particularly the bit about swapping the order of integration (which seems to require some sort of Tonelli/Fubini result).



My idea is something like the following: define the double Lebesgue integral
$$I_textLebesgue = int_x in [0,1) int_y in [0,1) mathbf 1(x ge y^2) cdot frac2xy(1-y^4) ; dy ; dx.$$ Then Tonelli's theorem lets us swap the order of summation to get
$$I_textLebesgue = int_y in [0,1) fracy1-y^4 int_x in [0,1) mathbf 1(x ge y^2) cdot 2x ; dx ; dy.$$ Thus the inner integral is the same as the Riemann one $int_y^2^1 2x ; dx = 1 - y^4$, hence $$I_textLebesgue = int_y in [0,1) y ; dy = frac12.$$ However, since the original Riemann integral was improper, I don't really know how to justify the first step (cue $x^-1 sin x$ example).



So I have the following three questions:



  1. Is there some result/theorem that lets me quickly see that $I_textRiemann = I_textLebesgue$? Bonus points for not using nonnegativity of $frac2xy1-y^4$.


  2. Is the calculation of $I_textLebesgue$ correct as written?


  3. Are there other ways to justify the interchange of improper integrals? I'm fine appealing to Lebesgue since Lebesgue integrals are "better-behaved" anyways, but I'm wondering if I've missed something easier.









share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Aug 26 at 21:20









Evan Chen

1,101513




1,101513











  • $u=y^2$ substitution simplifies it. Make it immediately.
    – herb steinberg
    Aug 26 at 22:02










  • Isn’t nonnegativity the fastest way? Simply apply Tonelli’s theorem.
    – Szeto
    Aug 26 at 22:42
















  • $u=y^2$ substitution simplifies it. Make it immediately.
    – herb steinberg
    Aug 26 at 22:02










  • Isn’t nonnegativity the fastest way? Simply apply Tonelli’s theorem.
    – Szeto
    Aug 26 at 22:42















$u=y^2$ substitution simplifies it. Make it immediately.
– herb steinberg
Aug 26 at 22:02




$u=y^2$ substitution simplifies it. Make it immediately.
– herb steinberg
Aug 26 at 22:02












Isn’t nonnegativity the fastest way? Simply apply Tonelli’s theorem.
– Szeto
Aug 26 at 22:42




Isn’t nonnegativity the fastest way? Simply apply Tonelli’s theorem.
– Szeto
Aug 26 at 22:42










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










You don't need to turn to Lebesgue integration to add rigor. The result can be obtained rigorously within the framework of the multi-dimensional Riemann integral.



The Riemann integral is naturally defined over bounded rectangles and extended to more general (rectifiable) regions with an indicator function. Before we even begin to consider Fubini's theorem to manipulate iterated integrals, we first need to define what the inproper integral means. In this case, the restriction of $f(x,y) = 2xy/(1-y^4)$ is continuous and Riemann integrable over $S_b = {(x,y): 0 leqslant y leqslant sqrtx leqslant b$ for any $b < 1$ with the integral given by



$$I_b = int_S_bf = int_[0,b]^2f , chi_S_b$$



There are some technicalities regarding how to precisely define the improper (or extended) Riemann integral for arbitrary regions, but it boils down in this case to $I = lim_b to 1- I_b$ when the limit exists.



At this point we apply Fubini's theorem specifically for Riemann integrals, as discussed for example in Analysis on Manifolds by Munkres or Calculus on Manifolds by Spivak. This states simply if $f$ is integrable and the iterated Riemann integrals exist --both of which are satisfied here -- we have



$$beginalignI_b = int_0^b left(int_0^b frac2xy1 - y^4, chi_S_b , dyright) , dx &= int_0^b left(int_0^b frac2xy1 - y^4, chi_S_b , dxright) , dy \ &= int_0^b left(int_y^2^b frac2xy1 - y^4, , dxright) , dy \ &= int_0^b frac(b^2-y^4)y1 - y^4, dy \ &= int_0^1 frac(b^2-y^4)y1 - y^4 chi_y leqslant b , dy endalign$$



Since, for all $y in [0,1]$ we have



$$left| frac(b^2-y^4)y1 - y^4 chi_y leqslant b right| leqslant y leqslant 1$$



it follows by the bounded convergence theorem that



$$I = lim_b to 1-I_b = int_0^1 lim_b to 1- frac(b^2-y^4)y1 - y^4 chi_y leqslant b , dy = int_0^1 y , dy = frac12$$



Lebesgue and Riemann integrals coincide on bounded rectangles, so the demonstration could also be made in the context of Lebesgue integrals in an analogous fashion with the dominated convergence theorem.






share|cite|improve this answer






















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2895527%2fevaluating-improper-double-integral-with-lebesgue%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    2
    down vote



    accepted










    You don't need to turn to Lebesgue integration to add rigor. The result can be obtained rigorously within the framework of the multi-dimensional Riemann integral.



    The Riemann integral is naturally defined over bounded rectangles and extended to more general (rectifiable) regions with an indicator function. Before we even begin to consider Fubini's theorem to manipulate iterated integrals, we first need to define what the inproper integral means. In this case, the restriction of $f(x,y) = 2xy/(1-y^4)$ is continuous and Riemann integrable over $S_b = {(x,y): 0 leqslant y leqslant sqrtx leqslant b$ for any $b < 1$ with the integral given by



    $$I_b = int_S_bf = int_[0,b]^2f , chi_S_b$$



    There are some technicalities regarding how to precisely define the improper (or extended) Riemann integral for arbitrary regions, but it boils down in this case to $I = lim_b to 1- I_b$ when the limit exists.



    At this point we apply Fubini's theorem specifically for Riemann integrals, as discussed for example in Analysis on Manifolds by Munkres or Calculus on Manifolds by Spivak. This states simply if $f$ is integrable and the iterated Riemann integrals exist --both of which are satisfied here -- we have



    $$beginalignI_b = int_0^b left(int_0^b frac2xy1 - y^4, chi_S_b , dyright) , dx &= int_0^b left(int_0^b frac2xy1 - y^4, chi_S_b , dxright) , dy \ &= int_0^b left(int_y^2^b frac2xy1 - y^4, , dxright) , dy \ &= int_0^b frac(b^2-y^4)y1 - y^4, dy \ &= int_0^1 frac(b^2-y^4)y1 - y^4 chi_y leqslant b , dy endalign$$



    Since, for all $y in [0,1]$ we have



    $$left| frac(b^2-y^4)y1 - y^4 chi_y leqslant b right| leqslant y leqslant 1$$



    it follows by the bounded convergence theorem that



    $$I = lim_b to 1-I_b = int_0^1 lim_b to 1- frac(b^2-y^4)y1 - y^4 chi_y leqslant b , dy = int_0^1 y , dy = frac12$$



    Lebesgue and Riemann integrals coincide on bounded rectangles, so the demonstration could also be made in the context of Lebesgue integrals in an analogous fashion with the dominated convergence theorem.






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      up vote
      2
      down vote



      accepted










      You don't need to turn to Lebesgue integration to add rigor. The result can be obtained rigorously within the framework of the multi-dimensional Riemann integral.



      The Riemann integral is naturally defined over bounded rectangles and extended to more general (rectifiable) regions with an indicator function. Before we even begin to consider Fubini's theorem to manipulate iterated integrals, we first need to define what the inproper integral means. In this case, the restriction of $f(x,y) = 2xy/(1-y^4)$ is continuous and Riemann integrable over $S_b = {(x,y): 0 leqslant y leqslant sqrtx leqslant b$ for any $b < 1$ with the integral given by



      $$I_b = int_S_bf = int_[0,b]^2f , chi_S_b$$



      There are some technicalities regarding how to precisely define the improper (or extended) Riemann integral for arbitrary regions, but it boils down in this case to $I = lim_b to 1- I_b$ when the limit exists.



      At this point we apply Fubini's theorem specifically for Riemann integrals, as discussed for example in Analysis on Manifolds by Munkres or Calculus on Manifolds by Spivak. This states simply if $f$ is integrable and the iterated Riemann integrals exist --both of which are satisfied here -- we have



      $$beginalignI_b = int_0^b left(int_0^b frac2xy1 - y^4, chi_S_b , dyright) , dx &= int_0^b left(int_0^b frac2xy1 - y^4, chi_S_b , dxright) , dy \ &= int_0^b left(int_y^2^b frac2xy1 - y^4, , dxright) , dy \ &= int_0^b frac(b^2-y^4)y1 - y^4, dy \ &= int_0^1 frac(b^2-y^4)y1 - y^4 chi_y leqslant b , dy endalign$$



      Since, for all $y in [0,1]$ we have



      $$left| frac(b^2-y^4)y1 - y^4 chi_y leqslant b right| leqslant y leqslant 1$$



      it follows by the bounded convergence theorem that



      $$I = lim_b to 1-I_b = int_0^1 lim_b to 1- frac(b^2-y^4)y1 - y^4 chi_y leqslant b , dy = int_0^1 y , dy = frac12$$



      Lebesgue and Riemann integrals coincide on bounded rectangles, so the demonstration could also be made in the context of Lebesgue integrals in an analogous fashion with the dominated convergence theorem.






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        up vote
        2
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        2
        down vote



        accepted






        You don't need to turn to Lebesgue integration to add rigor. The result can be obtained rigorously within the framework of the multi-dimensional Riemann integral.



        The Riemann integral is naturally defined over bounded rectangles and extended to more general (rectifiable) regions with an indicator function. Before we even begin to consider Fubini's theorem to manipulate iterated integrals, we first need to define what the inproper integral means. In this case, the restriction of $f(x,y) = 2xy/(1-y^4)$ is continuous and Riemann integrable over $S_b = {(x,y): 0 leqslant y leqslant sqrtx leqslant b$ for any $b < 1$ with the integral given by



        $$I_b = int_S_bf = int_[0,b]^2f , chi_S_b$$



        There are some technicalities regarding how to precisely define the improper (or extended) Riemann integral for arbitrary regions, but it boils down in this case to $I = lim_b to 1- I_b$ when the limit exists.



        At this point we apply Fubini's theorem specifically for Riemann integrals, as discussed for example in Analysis on Manifolds by Munkres or Calculus on Manifolds by Spivak. This states simply if $f$ is integrable and the iterated Riemann integrals exist --both of which are satisfied here -- we have



        $$beginalignI_b = int_0^b left(int_0^b frac2xy1 - y^4, chi_S_b , dyright) , dx &= int_0^b left(int_0^b frac2xy1 - y^4, chi_S_b , dxright) , dy \ &= int_0^b left(int_y^2^b frac2xy1 - y^4, , dxright) , dy \ &= int_0^b frac(b^2-y^4)y1 - y^4, dy \ &= int_0^1 frac(b^2-y^4)y1 - y^4 chi_y leqslant b , dy endalign$$



        Since, for all $y in [0,1]$ we have



        $$left| frac(b^2-y^4)y1 - y^4 chi_y leqslant b right| leqslant y leqslant 1$$



        it follows by the bounded convergence theorem that



        $$I = lim_b to 1-I_b = int_0^1 lim_b to 1- frac(b^2-y^4)y1 - y^4 chi_y leqslant b , dy = int_0^1 y , dy = frac12$$



        Lebesgue and Riemann integrals coincide on bounded rectangles, so the demonstration could also be made in the context of Lebesgue integrals in an analogous fashion with the dominated convergence theorem.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        You don't need to turn to Lebesgue integration to add rigor. The result can be obtained rigorously within the framework of the multi-dimensional Riemann integral.



        The Riemann integral is naturally defined over bounded rectangles and extended to more general (rectifiable) regions with an indicator function. Before we even begin to consider Fubini's theorem to manipulate iterated integrals, we first need to define what the inproper integral means. In this case, the restriction of $f(x,y) = 2xy/(1-y^4)$ is continuous and Riemann integrable over $S_b = {(x,y): 0 leqslant y leqslant sqrtx leqslant b$ for any $b < 1$ with the integral given by



        $$I_b = int_S_bf = int_[0,b]^2f , chi_S_b$$



        There are some technicalities regarding how to precisely define the improper (or extended) Riemann integral for arbitrary regions, but it boils down in this case to $I = lim_b to 1- I_b$ when the limit exists.



        At this point we apply Fubini's theorem specifically for Riemann integrals, as discussed for example in Analysis on Manifolds by Munkres or Calculus on Manifolds by Spivak. This states simply if $f$ is integrable and the iterated Riemann integrals exist --both of which are satisfied here -- we have



        $$beginalignI_b = int_0^b left(int_0^b frac2xy1 - y^4, chi_S_b , dyright) , dx &= int_0^b left(int_0^b frac2xy1 - y^4, chi_S_b , dxright) , dy \ &= int_0^b left(int_y^2^b frac2xy1 - y^4, , dxright) , dy \ &= int_0^b frac(b^2-y^4)y1 - y^4, dy \ &= int_0^1 frac(b^2-y^4)y1 - y^4 chi_y leqslant b , dy endalign$$



        Since, for all $y in [0,1]$ we have



        $$left| frac(b^2-y^4)y1 - y^4 chi_y leqslant b right| leqslant y leqslant 1$$



        it follows by the bounded convergence theorem that



        $$I = lim_b to 1-I_b = int_0^1 lim_b to 1- frac(b^2-y^4)y1 - y^4 chi_y leqslant b , dy = int_0^1 y , dy = frac12$$



        Lebesgue and Riemann integrals coincide on bounded rectangles, so the demonstration could also be made in the context of Lebesgue integrals in an analogous fashion with the dominated convergence theorem.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Aug 27 at 4:32

























        answered Aug 27 at 4:08









        RRL

        44.2k42362




        44.2k42362



























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2895527%2fevaluating-improper-double-integral-with-lebesgue%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            這個網誌中的熱門文章

            Is there any way to eliminate the singular point to solve this integral by hand or by approximations?

            Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

            Carbon dioxide