Number of subsets that meet the “spread out” condition

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Let $S = 1, 2,..., 12$, how many subsets of $S$ satisfy that the difference of any two number of the set is greater than $2$? Empty set and sets with only one element is counted in.



I am thinking of doing some partition and choosing numbers from each group. But it seems not to work. Any suggestion please? Thank you!







share|cite|improve this question






















  • How many such subsets are there (you can list and count them) for $S=1,2,3$? For $S=1,2,3,4$? And so on. Do you see a pattern in the answers? Does this suggest anything?
    – Steve Kass
    Aug 26 at 22:54










  • @SteveKass Oh I see! Thank you so much!
    – Edward Wang
    Aug 26 at 22:57














up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Let $S = 1, 2,..., 12$, how many subsets of $S$ satisfy that the difference of any two number of the set is greater than $2$? Empty set and sets with only one element is counted in.



I am thinking of doing some partition and choosing numbers from each group. But it seems not to work. Any suggestion please? Thank you!







share|cite|improve this question






















  • How many such subsets are there (you can list and count them) for $S=1,2,3$? For $S=1,2,3,4$? And so on. Do you see a pattern in the answers? Does this suggest anything?
    – Steve Kass
    Aug 26 at 22:54










  • @SteveKass Oh I see! Thank you so much!
    – Edward Wang
    Aug 26 at 22:57












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











Let $S = 1, 2,..., 12$, how many subsets of $S$ satisfy that the difference of any two number of the set is greater than $2$? Empty set and sets with only one element is counted in.



I am thinking of doing some partition and choosing numbers from each group. But it seems not to work. Any suggestion please? Thank you!







share|cite|improve this question














Let $S = 1, 2,..., 12$, how many subsets of $S$ satisfy that the difference of any two number of the set is greater than $2$? Empty set and sets with only one element is counted in.



I am thinking of doing some partition and choosing numbers from each group. But it seems not to work. Any suggestion please? Thank you!









share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 29 at 19:42

























asked Aug 26 at 22:38









Edward Wang

661411




661411











  • How many such subsets are there (you can list and count them) for $S=1,2,3$? For $S=1,2,3,4$? And so on. Do you see a pattern in the answers? Does this suggest anything?
    – Steve Kass
    Aug 26 at 22:54










  • @SteveKass Oh I see! Thank you so much!
    – Edward Wang
    Aug 26 at 22:57
















  • How many such subsets are there (you can list and count them) for $S=1,2,3$? For $S=1,2,3,4$? And so on. Do you see a pattern in the answers? Does this suggest anything?
    – Steve Kass
    Aug 26 at 22:54










  • @SteveKass Oh I see! Thank you so much!
    – Edward Wang
    Aug 26 at 22:57















How many such subsets are there (you can list and count them) for $S=1,2,3$? For $S=1,2,3,4$? And so on. Do you see a pattern in the answers? Does this suggest anything?
– Steve Kass
Aug 26 at 22:54




How many such subsets are there (you can list and count them) for $S=1,2,3$? For $S=1,2,3,4$? And so on. Do you see a pattern in the answers? Does this suggest anything?
– Steve Kass
Aug 26 at 22:54












@SteveKass Oh I see! Thank you so much!
– Edward Wang
Aug 26 at 22:57




@SteveKass Oh I see! Thank you so much!
– Edward Wang
Aug 26 at 22:57










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










The answer is in the form:
$$
1 + binom12-01 + binom12-22 + binom12-43+binom12-64
$$
Take $binom12-43$ as an example, we can think like this:



Assume we only have $8$ numbers, namely $1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8$, and we choose three numbers from them, such as $1,3,6$, we can always map it back to $1,3+2=5,6+2*2=10$, by adding the $2's$ back. This is one-to-one correspondence. Then we get the result in the end by adding them up.






share|cite|improve this answer
















  • 4




    This sort of problem lends itself to recursion. Let $A_n$ be the answer for the set $1,2,cdots, n$. (so you want $A_12$), We remark that either $n$ is in our subset or it isn't. If it is, then the rest of the subset must be an element of $A_n-3$. If it isn't then the subset must be an element of $A_n-1$. Thus $A_n=A_n-1+A_n-3$.
    – lulu
    Aug 27 at 0:05











  • @lulu Yeah thanks so much. Your approach is much simpler...
    – Edward Wang
    Aug 27 at 0:09










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2895599%2fnumber-of-subsets-that-meet-the-spread-out-condition%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote



accepted










The answer is in the form:
$$
1 + binom12-01 + binom12-22 + binom12-43+binom12-64
$$
Take $binom12-43$ as an example, we can think like this:



Assume we only have $8$ numbers, namely $1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8$, and we choose three numbers from them, such as $1,3,6$, we can always map it back to $1,3+2=5,6+2*2=10$, by adding the $2's$ back. This is one-to-one correspondence. Then we get the result in the end by adding them up.






share|cite|improve this answer
















  • 4




    This sort of problem lends itself to recursion. Let $A_n$ be the answer for the set $1,2,cdots, n$. (so you want $A_12$), We remark that either $n$ is in our subset or it isn't. If it is, then the rest of the subset must be an element of $A_n-3$. If it isn't then the subset must be an element of $A_n-1$. Thus $A_n=A_n-1+A_n-3$.
    – lulu
    Aug 27 at 0:05











  • @lulu Yeah thanks so much. Your approach is much simpler...
    – Edward Wang
    Aug 27 at 0:09














up vote
1
down vote



accepted










The answer is in the form:
$$
1 + binom12-01 + binom12-22 + binom12-43+binom12-64
$$
Take $binom12-43$ as an example, we can think like this:



Assume we only have $8$ numbers, namely $1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8$, and we choose three numbers from them, such as $1,3,6$, we can always map it back to $1,3+2=5,6+2*2=10$, by adding the $2's$ back. This is one-to-one correspondence. Then we get the result in the end by adding them up.






share|cite|improve this answer
















  • 4




    This sort of problem lends itself to recursion. Let $A_n$ be the answer for the set $1,2,cdots, n$. (so you want $A_12$), We remark that either $n$ is in our subset or it isn't. If it is, then the rest of the subset must be an element of $A_n-3$. If it isn't then the subset must be an element of $A_n-1$. Thus $A_n=A_n-1+A_n-3$.
    – lulu
    Aug 27 at 0:05











  • @lulu Yeah thanks so much. Your approach is much simpler...
    – Edward Wang
    Aug 27 at 0:09












up vote
1
down vote



accepted







up vote
1
down vote



accepted






The answer is in the form:
$$
1 + binom12-01 + binom12-22 + binom12-43+binom12-64
$$
Take $binom12-43$ as an example, we can think like this:



Assume we only have $8$ numbers, namely $1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8$, and we choose three numbers from them, such as $1,3,6$, we can always map it back to $1,3+2=5,6+2*2=10$, by adding the $2's$ back. This is one-to-one correspondence. Then we get the result in the end by adding them up.






share|cite|improve this answer












The answer is in the form:
$$
1 + binom12-01 + binom12-22 + binom12-43+binom12-64
$$
Take $binom12-43$ as an example, we can think like this:



Assume we only have $8$ numbers, namely $1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8$, and we choose three numbers from them, such as $1,3,6$, we can always map it back to $1,3+2=5,6+2*2=10$, by adding the $2's$ back. This is one-to-one correspondence. Then we get the result in the end by adding them up.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Aug 26 at 23:45









Edward Wang

661411




661411







  • 4




    This sort of problem lends itself to recursion. Let $A_n$ be the answer for the set $1,2,cdots, n$. (so you want $A_12$), We remark that either $n$ is in our subset or it isn't. If it is, then the rest of the subset must be an element of $A_n-3$. If it isn't then the subset must be an element of $A_n-1$. Thus $A_n=A_n-1+A_n-3$.
    – lulu
    Aug 27 at 0:05











  • @lulu Yeah thanks so much. Your approach is much simpler...
    – Edward Wang
    Aug 27 at 0:09












  • 4




    This sort of problem lends itself to recursion. Let $A_n$ be the answer for the set $1,2,cdots, n$. (so you want $A_12$), We remark that either $n$ is in our subset or it isn't. If it is, then the rest of the subset must be an element of $A_n-3$. If it isn't then the subset must be an element of $A_n-1$. Thus $A_n=A_n-1+A_n-3$.
    – lulu
    Aug 27 at 0:05











  • @lulu Yeah thanks so much. Your approach is much simpler...
    – Edward Wang
    Aug 27 at 0:09







4




4




This sort of problem lends itself to recursion. Let $A_n$ be the answer for the set $1,2,cdots, n$. (so you want $A_12$), We remark that either $n$ is in our subset or it isn't. If it is, then the rest of the subset must be an element of $A_n-3$. If it isn't then the subset must be an element of $A_n-1$. Thus $A_n=A_n-1+A_n-3$.
– lulu
Aug 27 at 0:05





This sort of problem lends itself to recursion. Let $A_n$ be the answer for the set $1,2,cdots, n$. (so you want $A_12$), We remark that either $n$ is in our subset or it isn't. If it is, then the rest of the subset must be an element of $A_n-3$. If it isn't then the subset must be an element of $A_n-1$. Thus $A_n=A_n-1+A_n-3$.
– lulu
Aug 27 at 0:05













@lulu Yeah thanks so much. Your approach is much simpler...
– Edward Wang
Aug 27 at 0:09




@lulu Yeah thanks so much. Your approach is much simpler...
– Edward Wang
Aug 27 at 0:09

















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2895599%2fnumber-of-subsets-that-meet-the-spread-out-condition%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

Is there any way to eliminate the singular point to solve this integral by hand or by approximations?

Why am i infinitely getting the same tweet with the Twitter Search API?

Carbon dioxide