Proof that a proper patch carries open sets to open sets.

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












O'Neill's Elementary Differential Geometry, problem 4.3.13 (Kindle edition), asks the student to show that the image of an open set, under a proper patch, is an open set.
Why is the image of a proper patch an open set discusses this question but does not specifically explain why. Here is my attempt at a solution. I do not know if it is complete as I have difficulty explaining the consequence of the fact that the mapping is continuous.



Let $phi$ be a proper patch and q be a point in $phi(E)$. Then $p=phi^-1(q)$ is in E. There is a neighborhood of p in E. All points sufficiently close to p map to points arbitrarily close to q. These points are in $phi(E)$. So there is a neighborhood of q that is in $phi(E)$ and $phi(E)$ is open. Specifically, $epsilon$ for the neighborhood of q is less than the maximum of $|phi(x)-q|$ for x in the neighborhood of p.



The problem goes on to ask the student to show that if $x:Drightarrow M$ is an arbitrary patch, then the image x(D) is an open set in M. There is a hint to use Corollary 4.3.3, which says "If x and y are patches in a surface M in $R^3$ whose images overlap, then the composite function $x^-1y$ and $y^-1x$ are differentiable mappings defined on open sets of $R^2$.



If x is an arbitrary patch and y is a proper patch, then it seems that the overlap of the images of x and y is an open set. But how to get from there to saying that the image of x is an open set?










share|cite|improve this question



















  • 1




    Possible duplicate of Proving that every patch in a surface $M$ in $R^3$ is proper.
    – Gene Naden
    Sep 10 at 19:42














up vote
0
down vote

favorite












O'Neill's Elementary Differential Geometry, problem 4.3.13 (Kindle edition), asks the student to show that the image of an open set, under a proper patch, is an open set.
Why is the image of a proper patch an open set discusses this question but does not specifically explain why. Here is my attempt at a solution. I do not know if it is complete as I have difficulty explaining the consequence of the fact that the mapping is continuous.



Let $phi$ be a proper patch and q be a point in $phi(E)$. Then $p=phi^-1(q)$ is in E. There is a neighborhood of p in E. All points sufficiently close to p map to points arbitrarily close to q. These points are in $phi(E)$. So there is a neighborhood of q that is in $phi(E)$ and $phi(E)$ is open. Specifically, $epsilon$ for the neighborhood of q is less than the maximum of $|phi(x)-q|$ for x in the neighborhood of p.



The problem goes on to ask the student to show that if $x:Drightarrow M$ is an arbitrary patch, then the image x(D) is an open set in M. There is a hint to use Corollary 4.3.3, which says "If x and y are patches in a surface M in $R^3$ whose images overlap, then the composite function $x^-1y$ and $y^-1x$ are differentiable mappings defined on open sets of $R^2$.



If x is an arbitrary patch and y is a proper patch, then it seems that the overlap of the images of x and y is an open set. But how to get from there to saying that the image of x is an open set?










share|cite|improve this question



















  • 1




    Possible duplicate of Proving that every patch in a surface $M$ in $R^3$ is proper.
    – Gene Naden
    Sep 10 at 19:42












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











O'Neill's Elementary Differential Geometry, problem 4.3.13 (Kindle edition), asks the student to show that the image of an open set, under a proper patch, is an open set.
Why is the image of a proper patch an open set discusses this question but does not specifically explain why. Here is my attempt at a solution. I do not know if it is complete as I have difficulty explaining the consequence of the fact that the mapping is continuous.



Let $phi$ be a proper patch and q be a point in $phi(E)$. Then $p=phi^-1(q)$ is in E. There is a neighborhood of p in E. All points sufficiently close to p map to points arbitrarily close to q. These points are in $phi(E)$. So there is a neighborhood of q that is in $phi(E)$ and $phi(E)$ is open. Specifically, $epsilon$ for the neighborhood of q is less than the maximum of $|phi(x)-q|$ for x in the neighborhood of p.



The problem goes on to ask the student to show that if $x:Drightarrow M$ is an arbitrary patch, then the image x(D) is an open set in M. There is a hint to use Corollary 4.3.3, which says "If x and y are patches in a surface M in $R^3$ whose images overlap, then the composite function $x^-1y$ and $y^-1x$ are differentiable mappings defined on open sets of $R^2$.



If x is an arbitrary patch and y is a proper patch, then it seems that the overlap of the images of x and y is an open set. But how to get from there to saying that the image of x is an open set?










share|cite|improve this question















O'Neill's Elementary Differential Geometry, problem 4.3.13 (Kindle edition), asks the student to show that the image of an open set, under a proper patch, is an open set.
Why is the image of a proper patch an open set discusses this question but does not specifically explain why. Here is my attempt at a solution. I do not know if it is complete as I have difficulty explaining the consequence of the fact that the mapping is continuous.



Let $phi$ be a proper patch and q be a point in $phi(E)$. Then $p=phi^-1(q)$ is in E. There is a neighborhood of p in E. All points sufficiently close to p map to points arbitrarily close to q. These points are in $phi(E)$. So there is a neighborhood of q that is in $phi(E)$ and $phi(E)$ is open. Specifically, $epsilon$ for the neighborhood of q is less than the maximum of $|phi(x)-q|$ for x in the neighborhood of p.



The problem goes on to ask the student to show that if $x:Drightarrow M$ is an arbitrary patch, then the image x(D) is an open set in M. There is a hint to use Corollary 4.3.3, which says "If x and y are patches in a surface M in $R^3$ whose images overlap, then the composite function $x^-1y$ and $y^-1x$ are differentiable mappings defined on open sets of $R^2$.



If x is an arbitrary patch and y is a proper patch, then it seems that the overlap of the images of x and y is an open set. But how to get from there to saying that the image of x is an open set?







differential-geometry






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Sep 10 at 8:30

























asked Sep 10 at 6:11









Gene Naden

637




637







  • 1




    Possible duplicate of Proving that every patch in a surface $M$ in $R^3$ is proper.
    – Gene Naden
    Sep 10 at 19:42












  • 1




    Possible duplicate of Proving that every patch in a surface $M$ in $R^3$ is proper.
    – Gene Naden
    Sep 10 at 19:42







1




1




Possible duplicate of Proving that every patch in a surface $M$ in $R^3$ is proper.
– Gene Naden
Sep 10 at 19:42




Possible duplicate of Proving that every patch in a surface $M$ in $R^3$ is proper.
– Gene Naden
Sep 10 at 19:42















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2911577%2fproof-that-a-proper-patch-carries-open-sets-to-open-sets%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest



































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2911577%2fproof-that-a-proper-patch-carries-open-sets-to-open-sets%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































這個網誌中的熱門文章

tkz-euclide: tkzDrawCircle[R] not working

How to combine Bézier curves to a surface?

1st Magritte Awards